Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Adults - UpToDate
Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Adults - UpToDate
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
INTRODUCTION
This topic will review the diagnosis of celiac disease. Our recommendations are largely
consistent with a consensus statement from the National Institutes of Health, the American
College of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterological Association guidelines [1-3].
The clinical manifestations and management of celiac disease in children and adults is
discussed in detail separately. (See "Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations
of celiac disease in adults" and "Management of celiac disease in adults" and "Diagnosis of
celiac disease in children" and "Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of
celiac disease in children" and "Management of celiac disease in children".)
The benefit of population screening for asymptomatic celiac disease has not been
demonstrated [4-9]. However, guidelines suggest screening for celiac disease be considered
in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of celiac
disease [3,9]. Serologic testing for celiac disease is recommended in adults with any of the
following:
DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH
Overview — The diagnostic approach is based on the risk for celiac disease and whether the
patient is on a gluten-containing diet. All testing for celiac disease should ideally be
performed while patients are on a gluten-containing diet. An approach to diagnosis of celiac
disease is summarized in the following algorithm ( algorithm 1). (See 'Patients on a gluten-
free diet' below.)
Individuals with low celiac disease probability — The probability of celiac disease is low
in individuals with one or more of the following clinical scenarios:
Individuals at low risk for celiac disease should undergo serologic testing. Patients with
positive serologic testing, should undergo an upper endoscopy with small bowel biopsy to
diagnose celiac disease. The serum tissue transglutaminase (tTG)-immunoglobulin A (IgA)
and endomysial (EMA)-IgA antibody tests have similar sensitivities. A negative result for
either test in individuals at low risk for celiac disease has a high negative predictive value and
obviates the need for small bowel biopsy. The specificities of the EMA IgA and tTG-IgA are
high. Thus, their positive predictive values are high even in low-risk populations [4,5,10]. The
EMA-IgA test has the highest diagnostic accuracy but is more costly and less widely available
than the tTG-IgA test ( algorithm 1) [10,11]. Combining several tests for celiac disease is
not recommended in low-risk populations in lieu of performing tTG-IgA alone as this may
marginally increase the sensitivity but substantially reduces specificity. (See 'Serologic
evaluation' below.)
Individuals with high celiac disease probability — Both serologic testing and small bowel
biopsy (regardless of celiac specific serology results) should be performed in individuals with
a high probability of celiac disease ( algorithm 1). (See 'Serologic evaluation' below and
'Endoscopy with small bowel biopsy' below.)
● Individuals whose clinical presentation is highly suggestive for celiac disease such as
chronic diarrhea/steatorrhea with weight loss.
● Individuals with both risk factors that place them at moderate to high risk of celiac
disease and consistent gastrointestinal or extraintestinal symptoms/signs of celiac
disease. (See 'Suggestive gastrointestinal symptoms' above and 'Extraintestinal
signs/symptoms suggestive of celiac disease' above.)
Risk factors that place an individual at moderate to high risk for celiac disease include:
Serum antibody assays — Serologic studies for celiac disease can be divided into two
groups based upon their target antigens [11]:
● Autoantibodies:
The test result is often reported simply as positive or negative since even low titers of
EMA-IgA are specific for celiac disease. Serum levels of EMA-IgA fall on a gluten-free
diet [14]. Limitations of this test include its cost, complexity, and operator dependency
that may result in interobserver variation.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests for tTG-IgA antibodies are now widely
available and are easier to perform and less costly than the immunofluorescence assay
used to detect IgA endomysial antibodies. The diagnostic accuracy of anti-tTG
immunoassays has been improved further by the use of human tTG in place of the
nonhuman tTG preparations used in earlier immunoassay kits [29].
• Anti-deamidated gliadin peptide – The DGP uses synthetic gliadin peptides that
mimic tTG-modified gliadin sequences to capture serum IgA or IgG against DGP
[19,20]. DGP-IgA has a sensitivity and specificity of 94 percent and 99 percent,
respectively. The DGP-IgG has a sensitivity and specificity of 92 percent and 100
percent, respectively [18-22]. (See "Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical
manifestations of celiac disease in adults".)
• Antigliadin antibody – The traditional antigliadin antibody tests (AGA-IgA and AGA-
IgG) have lower diagnostic accuracy as compared with other serologic tests for celiac
disease and are no longer recommended because they yield false-positive results in
15 to 20 percent of subjects tested [11,12].
The diagnostic performance of serologic tests for celiac disease are influenced by the
following factors:
● Variation among testing methods – Technical and methodologic factors might affect
the reported accuracies of diagnostic tests. However, the literature reports wide
variations in test sensitivity and specificity among different laboratories [11,30]. It is
therefore important to know the sensitivity and specificity of the assay as performed by
the testing laboratory before determining the clinical significance of a particular test
result [31].
● Dietary factors – A weakly positive serologic test for celiac disease may become
negative within weeks of adherence to a gluten-free diet. (See 'Patients on a gluten-free
diet' below.)
● Patient age – tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA may be falsely negative in children under two years.
(See "Diagnosis of celiac disease in children", section on 'Children younger than two
years'.)
● IgA deficiency – Undetectable IgA levels but not partial immunoglobulin A deficiency
(low but detectable serum IgA) decreases the sensitivity of TTG-IgA [33]. (See 'IgA
deficiency' below.).
Test interpretation
Positive serology — Individuals with positive serology require a small bowel biopsy to
confirm the diagnosis. Exceptions are patients with positive serology and biopsy-proven
dermatitis herpetiformis in whom the diagnosis can be established without a small bowel
biopsy. (See 'Endoscopy with small bowel biopsy' below and 'Dermatitis herpetiformis'
below.)
Negative serology — Serologic studies are useful in excluding the diagnosis of celiac
disease but cannot exclude celiac disease with 100 percent accuracy. Negative celiac
serologies in patients with celiac disease may be due to any one of the following:
● IgA deficiency – tTG-IgA serology will be falsely negative in untreated celiac disease in
patients with IgA deficiency, common variable immunodeficiency, or the use of an
immunosuppressant. (See 'IgA deficiency' below.)
● Low gluten/gluten-free diet – The individual may already be on a low gluten diet. An
approach to diagnosis of celiac disease in patients on a gluten-free diet is summarized
in the following algorithm ( algorithm 2). (See 'Patients on a gluten-free diet' below.)
● False negative – The serologic test (tTG-IgA) could be falsely negative. tTG-IgA
antibodies have a very high sensitivity (90 to 98 percent), but a false-negative serologic
test is possible. False-negative serology is more common in patients with mild disease
on histology. In such cases, DGP (IgA or IgG) antibody testing may be useful. However, a
small bowel biopsy is needed to make a diagnosis. (See 'Endoscopy with small bowel
biopsy' below.)
Endoscopy with small bowel biopsy — Upper endoscopy with small bowel biopsy serves to
establish the diagnosis in patients with suspected celiac disease ( algorithm 1).
Multiple biopsies of the duodenum (one or two from bulb and four from distal duodenum)
are necessary for diagnosis of celiac disease [3]. Bulb biopsies, if taken, should be clearly
labeled as such to help ensure that the pathologist takes into account the different mucosal
architecture of the bulb to avoid false-positive reports of villous atrophy. The accuracy of
biopsies can be improved with staining techniques and magnification endoscopy; however,
these approaches are not routinely used [35-37]. (See "Magnification endoscopy" and
"Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of celiac disease in adults", section
on 'Gastrointestinal manifestations'.)
Histologic features — Histologic features of celiac disease in the small intestine range from
a mild alteration characterized only by increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, to a severely
atrophic mucosa with complete loss of villi, enhanced epithelial apoptosis, and crypt
hyperplasia [38-43]. The histologic severity of intestinal lesions in celiac disease is graded
using the Marsh-Oberhuber classification ( figure 1) or the Corazza classification [3,44].
Marsh type 2 and 3 lesions (Corazza B1 or B2), while not pathognomonic for celiac disease,
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/diagnosis-of-celiac-disease-in-adults/print?search=celiac diseae&topicRef=4774&source=see_link 6/14
15/09/2023, 10:03 Diagnosis of celiac disease in adults - UpToDate
are supportive of the diagnosis ( figure 1 and table 1). Causes of small intestinal villous
atrophy other than celiac disease are shown in a table ( table 2 and algorithm 3). (See
'Positive serology and diagnostic small bowel biopsy' below.)
Positive serology and diagnostic small bowel biopsy — The diagnosis of celiac
disease is established when duodenal biopsy samples showing increased intraepithelial
lymphocytes with crypt hyperplasia (Marsh type 2), or, more commonly, also with villous
atrophy (Marsh type 3) in a patient with positive celiac serology ( algorithm 1).
● Positive serology and nondiagnostic small bowel biopsies – tTG-IgA serology may
occasionally be positive but the small intestinal biopsy may be normal or equivocal
(Marsh 0 or 1, respectively) ( figure 1). Discordant serology and biopsy results may be
due to the following:
• False-positive tTG – False-positive tTG results are rare but do occur and are usually
low titer (typically less than twice the upper limit of normal). Case reports suggest
that tTG-IgA antibodies may be falsely elevated during or after a febrile illness [45].
There are also concerns about the quantitative variability and lack of standardization
between commercially available serologic tests for celiac disease. (See 'Serum
antibody assays' above.)
The intestinal biopsy should be reviewed by a pathologist familiar with celiac disease to
look for subtle abnormalities of celiac disease. In addition, we perform an alternate
antibody test (EMA-IgA or DGP-IgA). If serology and histology remain discordant, we
perform HLA-DQ2/DQ8 typing ( algorithm 1).
The finding of Marsh type 2 or 3 lesions on histology in a patient with positive celiac
serology is diagnostic of celiac disease ( figure 1). (See 'Positive serology and
diagnostic small bowel biopsy' above.)
● Negative serology and abnormal small bowel biopsy – For patients with histologic
findings suggestive of celiac disease (eg, villous atrophy) but negative serologies, we
perform HLA-DQ2/DQ8 genotyping. If haplotypes HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 are present, we
recommend a gluten-free diet for 12 to 24 months and monitor the clinical response.
We also perform a repeat upper endoscopy with biopsies after 12 to 24 months of a
gluten-free diet to confirm mucosal healing. Patients with a histologic response are
likely to have sero-negative celiac disease. Individuals without a histologic response
likely have non-celiac villous atrophy ( table 2 and algorithm 3).
HLA testing in selected patients — The haplotypes HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 are present in almost
all patients with celiac disease. Testing for these haplotypes has a negative predictive value
of greater than 99 percent, but positive predictive value is only around 12 percent because
these haplotypes are common in the general population [49]. Hence, HLA testing is useful
only in ruling out celiac disease:
● Patients with discordant celiac-specific serology and histology (see 'Discordant serology
and small bowel biopsy' above).
● Patients who refuse upper endoscopy (see 'Patients unable/unwilling to undergo upper
endoscopy' below).
● Patients with suspicion of refractory celiac disease where the original diagnosis of celiac
disease remains in question (see "Management of celiac disease in adults", section on
'Non-responders').
● HLA typing is sometimes performed in patients at high risk for celiac disease (eg, family
history of celiac disease). A negative result will exclude celiac disease risk. This approach
is most commonly used in at-risk children to obviate the need for periodic serology
testing. (See "Diagnosis of celiac disease in children", section on 'Members of high-risk
groups'.)
Symptomatic adults who are unwilling or unable to undergo upper GI endoscopy but have a
high-level tTG IgA (>10-fold elevation above the upper limit of normal) with a positive
endomysial antibody (EMA) in a second blood sample can be diagnosed as likely celiac
disease [3]. (See 'Patients unable/unwilling to undergo upper endoscopy' below.)
Patients on a gluten-free diet — While there are limited data with regard to the decrease in
antibody titers in individuals on a gluten-free diet, a weakly positive test may become
negative within weeks of strict adherence to a gluten-free diet [50]. After 6 to 12 months on a
gluten-free diet, approximately 80 percent of individuals with celiac disease will test negative
by serology. By five years, more than 90 percent of patients on a gluten-free diet will have
negative serologies [51,52]. An approach to diagnosis of celiac disease in patients on a
gluten-free diet is summarized in the following algorithm ( algorithm 2) [3,53].
Patients who opt to continue on a strictly gluten-free diet without undergoing formal
gluten challenge may be managed in a similar fashion to those with known celiac
disease ( algorithm 2). (See "Management of celiac disease in adults".)
IgA deficiency — IgA deficiency is more common in celiac disease (2 to 5 percent) than in
the general population (<0.5 percent). IgA EMA and IgA tTG are falsely negative in patients
with IgA deficiency. In patients in whom very low IgA or selective IgA deficiency is identified,
IgG-based testing should be performed. We perform IgG DGP due to its higher sensitivity
and specificity as compared with IgG anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies. IgG antigliadin
is also usually positive in the 1 to 2 percent of celiac patients who have IgA deficiency [55,56].
In patients without a high-level tTG IgA, we perform HLA testing. Absence of alleles encoding
DQ2 or DQ8 excludes celiac disease. In patients who are DQ2- or DQ8-positive and have
positive celiac serologies, a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) may reveal visible features of
celiac disease in the small intestine. However, as endoscopic features are not specific for
celiac disease, VCE should not be used for initial diagnosis except for patients with positive
celiac-specific serology who are unwilling or unable to undergo upper endoscopy with biopsy
[57]. (See "Wireless video capsule endoscopy", section on 'Small bowel tumors, polyps, and
other pathology'.)
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
The most common disorders in the differential diagnosis of celiac disease include irritable
bowel syndrome, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, lactose intolerance, chronic
pancreatitis, microscopic colitis, and inflammatory bowel disease. Celiac disease can be
differentiated from these by serologic evaluation and small bowel biopsy. Approach to the
evaluation of patients with diarrhea is discussed in detail separately. (See "Clinical
manifestations and diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome in adults", section on 'Diagnosis'
and "Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis", section on
'Diagnosis' and "Microscopic (lymphocytic and collagenous) colitis: Clinical manifestations,
diagnosis, and management" and "Lactose intolerance and malabsorption: Clinical
manifestations, diagnosis, and management", section on 'Diagnostic evaluation' and
"Approach to the adult with chronic diarrhea in resource-abundant settings", section on
'Initial evaluation'.)
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Celiac disease" and
"Society guideline links: Dermatitis herpetiformis".)
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the
Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th
grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have
about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview
and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are
longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th
grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are
comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to
print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on
a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
● Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: Celiac disease in children (Beyond the
Basics)" and "Patient education: Celiac disease in adults (Beyond the Basics)")
Patient perspectives are provided for selected disorders to help clinicians better understand
the patient experience and patient concerns. These narratives may offer insights into patient
values and preferences not included in other UpToDate topics. (See "Patient perspective:
Celiac disease".)
● When to suspect celiac disease – Testing for celiac disease should be performed in
adults with suggestive gastrointestinal or extraintestinal signs/symptoms of celiac
disease. Extraintestinal signs/symptoms of celiac disease include unexplained iron
deficiency anemia, folate or vitamin B12 deficiency, persistent elevation in serum
aminotransferases, dermatitis herpetiformis, fatigue, recurrent headaches, recurrent
fetal loss, low birthweight offspring, reduced fertility, persistent aphthous stomatitis,
dental enamel hypoplasia, metabolic bone disease and premature osteoporosis,
idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, or nonhereditary cerebellar ataxia. (See 'Who should
be tested' above.)
● Diagnostic approach – Testing for celiac disease should ideally be performed while
patients are on a gluten-containing diet. The testing approach varies based on the
probability of celiac disease.
• Individuals with a high probability of celiac disease – Both serologic testing and
small bowel biopsy (regardless of celiac-specific serology results) should be
performed ( algorithm 1). (See 'Individuals with high celiac disease probability'
above.)
• Patients on a gluten-free diet – For patients who are already on a gluten-free diet,
an approach to diagnosis of celiac disease is summarized in the following algorithm
( algorithm 2). (See 'Patients on a gluten-free diet' above.)
• Negative serology and abnormal small bowel biopsy – For patients with
histologic findings suggestive of celiac disease (eg, villous atrophy) but negative
serologies, we perform HLA-DQ2/DQ8 genotyping. If haplotypes HLA-DQ2 or DQ8
are present, we recommend a gluten-free diet for 12 to 24 months and monitor the
clinical response. We also perform a repeat upper endoscopy with biopsies after 12
to 24 months of a gluten-free diet to confirm mucosal healing. Patients with a
histologic response are likely to have celiac disease. Individuals without a histologic
response likely have non-celiac villous atrophy ( table 2 and algorithm 3).