Arnav Singh 245 (UNEP)
Arnav Singh 245 (UNEP)
Program
In the subject of
Environmental Law
UILS Section E
Chandigarh Semester 8
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT
PROGRAM (UNEP)
Environmental issues weren't a top priority when the UN was established in 1945, and the
word "environment" isn't even mentioned in the UN Charter. As a result, no UN body or
programme focused on the environment was created in the 20 years that followed.
The international leadership began to consider putting laws and regulations in place for
environmental issues during the 1960s and 1970s as a result of rising pollution levels,
much like the International Labor Organization (ILO), the World Health Organization
(WHO), etc.
But the necessity for global environmental governance was not widely acknowledged in
the 1970s, especially by developing countries. Some claimed that countries in poverty did
not need to prioritise environmental issues. Several of the governments of developing
nations were persuaded by Canadian diplomat Maurice Strong that this issue required
priority.
The UN had taken up the environment as an issue in 1968 with a report by the UN
secretary-general U Thant, which warned: “If current trends continue, life on Earth could
be endangered.” It called for the UN to hold a Conference on the Human Environment,
which took place in Stockholm in June 1972.
The Stockholm Conference, a United Nations conference on the environment, was held in
1972. The conference included a wide range of subjects, including pollution, the
protection of resources, environmental change, and natural and biological disasters.
This meeting led to the creation of the Stockholm Declaration on the Human
Environment and the United Nations Environment Program, an organisation for
environmental management (UNEP).
With 300 employees, including 100 professionals in various sectors, and a five-year fund
of more than US$100 million, UNEP's headquarters were built in Nairobi, Kenya.
At the time, the United States donated $40 million, while the remaining $50 million came
from 50 other countries.
Role of UNEP
o The goal of UNEP is to inspire, enlighten, and enable nations and peoples to improve
their quality of life without compromising that of future generations in order to give
leadership and promote collaboration in environmental protection.
“To provide leadership and encourage partnership in caring for the environment by
inspiring, informing, and enabling nations and peoples to improve their quality of life
without compromising that of future generations”
1) Climate Change
3) Ecosystem Management
UNEP encourages the use of ecosystem services and facilitates the management
and restoration of ecosystems in a way that is consistent with sustainable
development. The Global Plan of Action (GPA) for the Preservation of the
Maritime Environment from Land-Based Activities is one example.
4) Environmental Governance
In order to achieve sustainable development at the national, international, and
regional levels, as well as to mainstream environmental considerations in
development planning, UNEP assists governments in establishing, putting into
place, and strengthening the necessary procedures, institutions, laws, policies, and
programmes.
The UNEP works to reduce the negative effects that toxic substances and
hazardous waste have on the environment and people. In order to lower hazards to
human health and the environment, UNEP has started discussions for a global
mercury accord and is putting projects on mercury and the Strategic Approach to
International Chemicals Management (SAICM) into action.
In order to ensure that natural resources are generated, handled, and utilised in a
more environmentally sustainable manner, UNEP focuses on regional and
international operations. The Marrakech Process, for instance, is an international
initiative to promote the development of a 10-Year Framework of Programs on
sustainable consumption and production.
Impact OF UNEP
The United Nations Environment Programme has made some notable contributions to scientific
research and international policymaking since its founding. It was extremely successful in
developing a system for data collection, information sharing, cross-sector scientific assessment,
and environmental monitoring.
MARPOL
The first meeting of its governing council in 1973 led to the adoption of:
Montreal Protocol
As a result, according to UNEP, the ozone layer is expected to regenerate by the middle
of the century, saving the lives of about 2 million people annually from skin cancer.
According to Andrew Steer, president and CEO of the Bezos Environment Fund, the
IPCC's methodology represented a "completely new way of doing science." With the
ability for politicians to make edit suggestions for the summary report, working groups of
the top scientists in the world use it to produce reports. According on the scientists'
opinions and studies, the report's scientific claims are given a level of credibility.
The convention is called Minamata after a city in Japan. Given the horrific mercury
poisoning catastrophe that the city experienced, this designation is significant
symbolically. This international agreement is anticipated to improve mercury
pollution reduction over the following few decades from the targeted activities
responsible for the significant mercury emission to the immediate environment.
Plastic Pollution
The UN Environment Assembly, which will replace the UNEP Governing Council in
early 2022, is where states most recently decided to begin negotiations on a global,
legally enforceable accord to eradicate plastic pollution. The most significant
environmental multilateral agreement since the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change,
according to UNEP Executive Director Inger Andersen.
The GEO is now "one of the two most prestigious environmental outlook magazines
currently accessible," according to the statement. Among the many nations that have used
GEO methodology to develop and enhance their environmental reporting or used GEO to
inform policy formation are Cuba, Peru, Costa Rica, Barbados, Gabon, Senegal, Congo,
and Cameroon.
SHORTCOMINGS OF UNEP
Commentators' appreciation for UNEP is tempered by admissions that the environment
has continued to deteriorate at an alarming rate despite its accomplishments. However,
many think that this is less a failure of UNEP than it is a failure of governments for
not acting on the organization's scientific conclusions and recommendations.
Some people think UNEP was designed to be weak from the beginning, especially since
Kenya was chosen as the country for its headquarters. As the poor world needed a bigger
role in UN activities, the country of East Africa had fought hard to host the new
organisation.
As the first time a developing nation would host a UN organisation, its victory had been
viewed at the time as a significant coup. Several contend that its early success was
constrained by the lack of infrastructure and communications connectivity,
nevertheless.
According to Ivanova, these restrictions in turn made it challenging to hire and keep
workers. Its legitimacy decreased as a result, she argued, and its visibility fell. Even 50
years after UNEP's founding, she pointed out that the location did not automatically
result in more input from developing nations, with only 36% of them having diplomatic
posts in Nairobi.
UNEP's formal status places it in a weaker position in the UN's hierarchy from the
start, severely limiting its authority and capabilities in leading coordination activities
among the MEA cluster, within the UN system, and on the international stage, even
though the decision was not made with the intention of rendering UNEP ineffective at the
time.
The efficiency of UNEP has also been limited by its budget. The UNEP's Environment
Fund, which is a combination of government contributions based on the size of their
economies, and donations for specific projects or "earmarked contributions," accounts for
the majority of the organization's funding.
The percentage coming from the Environment Fund has decreased over time. The fund
was anticipated to start off with US$100 million annually and increase over time. Yet,
according to UNEP, it received $78.5 million in 2021, or 15% of the organization's
overall revenue. More than 90% of this came from 15 nations, with the Netherlands,
France, and Germany being the largest donors to the organisation.
It may be inferred from the response that whether or not governments view UNEP as
helpful in producing outcomes that would meet their priorities, influences funding to
some extent.
In order to cover the leadership void at various levels of governance, new entities have
frequently reduced UNEP's obligations. For instance, UNEP's initiatives are overlapping
with the World Bank's growing environmental activity. The Global Environmental
Facility was founded just before the 1992 Rio Earth Conference, which also lessened the
importance of UNEP.
ROAD AHEAD
UNEP is now an organization which has completed fifty years but still has a long way to
go. A way that has got some challenges ahead.
Like the UN Human Rights Council does for human rights, UNEP may play a role in
advocating higher international standards for corporate accountability and behaviour with
regard to the environment.
UNEP needs to clean up its act when it comes to feasibility of projects. Sometimes the
UNEP undertakes initiatives that are excessively expensive or that just don't seem to
take off. One Yemeni initiative aimed to develop an agro-forestry complex on a 390-
hectra region with poor, arid soils and test various plant-raising methods. The UNEP
struggled to find expertise and experienced numerous construction equipment delays in
addition to having regular mechanical failures. The project was abandoned because it was
found to be excessively expensive and inefficient.
Since they are facing problems in garnering funds they need to spend the limited
resources they have judiciously.
The UNEP plays a vital role in providing the international community with information
and training as environmental policies and practices are developed. The UNEP
enjoys a favourable reputation in civil society and has not faced the widespread criticism
that other international agencies have.
UNEP needs to amend its policy on participation of civil societies in policy making.
They have weaknesses in the creation of policies and lack the practical competence to put
those policies into practice. Their legislature places restrictions on their ability to allow
civil society to act as advocates for persons with an interest in the environment.
They must strive to establish their own distinct objectives so that other organisations
can understand what their primary goal is. They must also cease taking on new
obligations and concentrate on fulfilling those that have already been given to them.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
WEBSITE(S)
https://www.unep.org/about-un-environment/why-does-un-environment-programme-matter/
structure-and-leadership
https://www.un.org/youthenvoy/2013/08/unep-united-nations-environment-programme/
#:~:text=UNEP's%20mission%20is%20to%20provide,compromising%20that%20of%20future
%20generations.
https://byjusexamprep.com/upsc-exam/united-nations-environment-programme-unep
https://chinadialogue.net/en/climate/unep-at-50-what-has-the-worlds-environmental-conscience-
achieved/
https://earth.org/where-does-the-united-nations-environment-programme-unep-fall-short/
https://www.passblue.com/2015/02/05/the-un-environment-program-influential-but-lacking-
power/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Environment_Programme#cite_note-21
RESEARCH PAPER
An Analysis of the UNEP by Brenna Gate