0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views9 pages

Government of Pakistan: For Officers in Bps 17 & 18 Confidential

The performance evaluation report is for Abdul Rauf, a lecturer at the Ministry of Defense in Pakistan, for the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. The report evaluates Rauf's performance in his role as an English lecturer, including his teaching duties, involvement in committees, and participation in academic competitions as a judge. His reporting officer rated his performance as very good in most categories, including intelligence, confidence, reliability under pressure, financial responsibility, and relations with superiors, colleagues, and subordinates.

Uploaded by

irfan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views9 pages

Government of Pakistan: For Officers in Bps 17 & 18 Confidential

The performance evaluation report is for Abdul Rauf, a lecturer at the Ministry of Defense in Pakistan, for the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. The report evaluates Rauf's performance in his role as an English lecturer, including his teaching duties, involvement in committees, and participation in academic competitions as a judge. His reporting officer rated his performance as very good in most categories, including intelligence, confidence, reliability under pressure, financial responsibility, and relations with superiors, colleagues, and subordinates.

Uploaded by

irfan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

FOR OFFICERS IN BPS 17 & 18 CONFIDENTIAL

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Ministry /Division/ Defense Service/Group Education

Department/Office FGEIs(C/G).

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD 01-01-2018 TO 31-12-2018

PART I

(TO BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON)

1. Name (in block letters) Abdul Rauf

2. Personnel number 04/PF-1925/FGEI ( CA )

3. Date of birth 08-10-1979

4. Date of entry in service 20-05-2010

5. Post held during the period (with BPS) Lecturer (BS-17)

6. Academic qualifications M. A. English

7. Knowledge of languages (Please indicate proficiency in speaking (S), reading (R) and writing (W)

i. English ( Reading, Writing and Speaking )


ii. Urdu ( Reading, Writing and Speaking )
iii. Saraiki ( Reading, Writing and Speaking )
iv. Punjabi ( Reading, Writing and Speaking )

1
8. Training received during the evaluation period

Name of course attended Duration with dates Name of institution and country

9. Period served

(i) In present post 08 years 07 Months (ii) Under the reporting officer 05 yrs 04 month

PART II

(TO BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON)

1. Job description

i. Teaching of English to the classes of HSSC and Graduation level.


ii. Member of Function & Magazine Committee
iii. Worked as Chief Judge in FGEI’s Regional Speech Contests, 2018
iv. Worked as Head Examiner of Regional level Essay writing competition
(schools), 2018.
v. Management of team of Participants in All Pakistan Nat and Declamation
contests in Kharian as well as in Rawalpindi, 2018.
vi. Judge of the English Regional Drama Contest among APSC Multan Region,
2018.
vii. I did all the tasks assigned by the authority whenever and wherever it was
needed.
viii. Coordination in full with discipline and students’ affairs committee.
ix. Full cooperation with the Authority and management in all affairs regarding
the uplifting of the institutions.
x. Maintaining the CQI’s 2018 guidelines to the full extent in the classroom
management.

2
2. Brief account of performance on the job during the period supported by statistical data
where possible. Targets given and actual performance against such targets should be
highlighted. Reasons for shortfall, if any, may also be stated.

1. Results: Following are results of my HSSC-I classes


Grades No. of
Subj App Passed PASS % GPA Compart.
A1 A B C D E
ENG-I 25 25 100 3.28 0 2 10 9 1 3 0
2. As Teacher: Some responsibilities of the job include:
i. Teaching of English to the classes of HSSC and Graduation level.
ii. The courses were completed in stipulated time.
iii. Weekly and monthly tests were conducted for preparation of student for Board Exams.
iv. interviewing course students time to time for better understanding of their problems
v. lecture planning, preparation and research
vi. contacting with students parents weekly if some students are not performing well in the weekly
tests.
vii. checking and assessing students' work and maintaining the records of the tests.
viii. encouraging personal development via tutorial work
ix. invigilating examinations
x. attending staff meetings
xi. reading academic journals and writing research proposals, papers and other publications
xii. maintaining of students’ attendance registers and got checked by the worthy principal time to time.
3. Function and Magazine Committee: Performing assigned work by the head of committee
whenever required. Taking the participants to the other cities for competitions in declamation and Naat
Competition. Helping the head of committee in providing the necessary materials for the functions.
4. Assignments:
a. Chief Judge in FGEIs Regional Speech Contest, 2018.
b. Head examiner in Regional level Essay Writing Competition, 2018.
c. Judge in One Act Play, English Competition 2018 at Regional level held at Army Public
School & College Multan, Cantt.
d. Attending all the P.T.M’s during the session.
e. Question paper setting in the subject of English in all Bimonthly, Sendup, Pre-Board and
Promotion Examination assigned by examination committee.
f. Paper marked in time as assigned by examination committee and higher authority.
g. Invigilation duty performed diligently in all the internal examinations.
h. Attending the summer camp 2018.

PART III -
(EVALUATION BY THE REPORTING OFFICER)

The rating in Part III should be recorded by initialing the appropriate box.
The ratings denoted by alphabets are as follows:
'A' Very Good, 'B' Good, 'C' Average, 'D' Below Average

For uniform interpretation of qualities, two extreme shades are mentioned


against each quality.
A B C D

3
1. Intelligence

Dull; slow
Exceptionally bright; excellent
comprehension

A B C D

2. Confidence and will power


Uncertain; hesitant

Exceptionally confident and resolute

3. Acceptance of responsibility Reluctant to take on


responsibility; will avoid
it whenever possible.
Always prepared to take on
responsibility even in difficult cases.

4. Reliability under pressure Confused and easily


flustered even under
normal pressure.
Calm and exceptionally reliable at all
times -
5. Financial responsibility
Irresponsible
Exercises due care and discipline

6.
Relations with -
Un-cooperative
(i) Superiors -
Cooperative and trusted

ii) Colleagues

Difficult colleague
Works well in a team

Discourteous and
iii) Subordinates - intolerant;
Courteous and effective;
Encouraging

7. Behavior with public Arrogant, discourteous


and indifferent

Courteous and helpful -

4
8. Indecisive;
Vacillating
Ability to decide routine matters

Logical and decisive -


A B C D

9. Knowledge of relevant laws, rules,


regulations, instructions and
procedures.
Ignorant and
Uninformed.

Exceptionally well informed,


keeps abreast of latest developments.

PART IV -
(REPORTING OFFICER'S EVALUATION)

1. Please comment on the officer's performance on the job as given in Part II(2)
with special reference to knowledge of work, quality and quantity of output.
How far was the officer able to achieve targets? Do you agree with what has
been stated in Part II (2)?

A B C D

1 Quality of work Generally produces


Always produce work of exceptionally work of poor quality.
high Quality

5
2 Output of work Always behind schedule;
Always up-to-date; accumulates no very slow disposal.
arrears

2. Integrity (Morality, uprightness and honesty) -

A B C D

1. Integrity
a. General Unscrupulous
Irreproachable

b. Intellectual
Honest & straightforward Devious; Sycophant

3. Pen picture with focus on the officer's strengths and weaknesses not
covered in Part III (Weakness will not be considered as adverse entries unless
intended to be treated as adverse).

4. Special aptitude

5. Recommendations for future training

6
6. Overall grading

Reporting officer Countersigning officer

(i) Very Good

(ii) Good

(iii) Average

(iv) Below Average

7. Fitness for promotion

Reporting officer Countersigning officer

(i) Fit for promotion

(ii) Recently promoted/appointed.


Assessment premature

(iii) Not yet fit for promotion

(iv) Unlikely to progress further

Name of the reporting officer MALIK MUAMMAMD MASOOD Signature


(Capital letters)

Designation Principal FG Degree College for Boys Multan Date

7
PART V

(REMARKS OF THE COUNTERSIGNING OFFICER)

1. How well do you know the officer? If you disagree with the assessment of
the reporting officer, please give reasons

2. Evaluation of the quality of assessment made by the reporting officer

Exaggerated Fair Biased

Name of the countersigning officerLt. Col. FAROOQ AZAM KHAN Signature


(Capital letters)

Designation GSO-I, FGEI(C/G) Regional Office Multan Cantt. Date

8
PART VI

REMARKS OF THE SECOND COUNTERSIGNING OFFICER (IF ANY)

Name Signature

Designation Date

You might also like