Annisa Nur Wijayanti

SECTION 1
Material – 1
1. Based on the information in the email, Mr. Don’t Know Why are seeking advice on
requirements and the process for setting up the business. In my opinion, the email
doesn’t provide specific details about the client’s business, the type of assistance they
require, and even the email did not include a profile related to Mr. Don’t Know Why.
Without this additional information, it's challenging to determine if the email contains
all the necessary details for the recipient to provide meaningful assistance.
2. (The answer is “No”)
3. Information that will be necessary to prepare for me as a lawyer to prepare my advices:
a. Specific details that need to mentioned:
- It's crucial to know the specific nature of the client's business. Is it a
manufacturing business, a service-based business, a technology startup, or
something else? The legal and operational requirements can vary significantly
based on the type of business.
- The basic informations about the clients on the introductions, whether the client
is a foreingn company or a local company and amount of capital that will be
invested
b. The profile of Mr. Don’t Know Why:
- The person who sent the email representing the law firm
- The legal address of the law firm
4. The Laws of Indonesia that will apply in this scenario is:
- Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies;
- Law Number 25 of 2007 on Investment;
- Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Job Creation;
- Government Regulation Number 7 of 2021 concerning the Ease, Protection,
and Empowerment of Cooperatives and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises;
- Government Regulation Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Basic Capital of
Companies and the Registration of Establishment, Changes, and Dissolution
of Companies Meeting the Criteria for Micro and Small Enterprises;
- Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 21 of 2021 concerning
the Requirements and Procedures for the Registration of Establishment,
Changes, and Dissolution of Legal Entities in the Form of Limited Liability
Companies.
 5. As a lawyer, the meaning of “you are in the position to undertake the project” is I will
be the person to handle and manage the responsibilility to provide the legal services
and support needed for the project of client’s.
6. It's a standard practice in legal and business interactions to maintain confidentiality
and not disclose sensitive information or documents without the permission of the party
who provided them. If there were a breach of confidentiality, it could potentially lead to
legal consequences. The confidentially request is based on Law Number 18 of 2003
concerning advocates.

Material – 2
1. The principle of freedom of contract is regulated in Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil
Code. Freedom of contract are allows parties entering into a contract include any terms
they desire, provided they do not violate mandatory provisions of Indonesian law.
These mandatory provisions stem from Indonesian statutory laws and regulations,
public policy, and public order.
2. The establishment of PT PMA companies is regulated by Law Number 25 of 2007
regarding Invesment and Law Number 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability
Companies, while PT PMDN companies are regulated by the same laws but with more
flexibility on investment value. PT PMA companies are designed for foreign investors
aiming to establish a business in Indonesia, while PT PMDN companies is for
Indonesian citizens or legal entities to set up and expand their businesses
domestically.
3. Corporate lawyers are regulated by the Indonesian Advocates Law. Corporate lawyers
are legal professionals who specialize in corporate and commercial law. They primarily
advise businesses and corporations on various legal matters, including mergers and
acquisitions, contracts, regulatory compliance, and corporate governance. They
represent corporate clients in non-litigation legal matters. A Notary is authorized to
draft, certify, and authenticate various legal documents, including deeds, contracts,
wills, and other documents requiring notarization. And the last one is the Barrister are
lawyers who specialize in litigation and courtroom representation. They advocate on
behalf of their clients in legal proceedings, including civil and criminal cases.
4. The Board of Directors (BOD), as regulated by Law Number 40 of 2007, is responsible
for the day-to-day management and operations of the company, while the Board of
Commissioners (BOC) acts as a supervisory and advisory body to the BOD. The BOD
is also responsible for appointing, replacing, and dismissing directors, and if the BOD
consists of two or more members, one of them must take on the role of president
director, who is in charge of the board of directors.
 5. "Legal due diligence" refers to the comprehensive examination and assessment of
legal aspects and risks associated with a business or corporate transaction. Corporate
lawyers conduct legal due diligence to gain a thorough understanding of a company's
legal position, identify potential legal issues or risks, and ensure that the transaction is
legally sound and compliant with relevant laws and regulations.

SECTION 2
Material – 1

SURAT KUASA

Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini :

Nama : Nadafa Paundra, S.T
NIK : 123342492429i
Pekerjaan : Direktur Utama PT. Makmur Sentosa
Alamat : Jalan Kerucut Nomor 25, Matraman, Jakarta Timur, DKI Jakarta
Yang selanjutnya disebut sebagai PEMBERI KUASA, dalam hal ini memilih domisili hukum
kuasanya sebagaimana di sebut di bawah ini memberikan kuasa khusus kepada:
----- Annisa Nur Wijayanti, S.H.. M.H. -----
Sebagai seorang advokat di HHR Lawyers yang berkantor di Jalan Kawi Raya Nomor 46,
Setiabudi, Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta; yang selanjutnya disebut
sebagai PENERIMA KUASA

---- KHUSUS ----

Dalam hal ini bertindak untuk dan atas nama serta mewakili PEMBERI KUASA, Nadafa
Paundra, S.T. selaku Direktur Utama PT. Makmur Sentosa di hadapkan Pengadilan Negeri
Semarang bermaksud mengajukan gugatan terhadap Sabar Setiawan selaku Direktur PT.
Semangat Bangun yang bertempat tinggal di Jalan Kembarang Nomor 10, Semarang, Jawa
Tengah, perihal wanprestasi atas hubungan hukum dalam perjanjian kredit secara sah
dihadapkan Notaris PPAT Vina Maulina S.H., M.Kn., pada tanggal 15 September 1999.

PENERIMA KUASA diberikan hak dan wewenang meliputi:

1. Atas nama PEMBERI KUASA bertindak di hadapan Pengadilan Semarang selaku
pengadilan pilihan para pihak, maupun instansi atau perorangan manapun;
2. Penerima Kuasa boleh membuat dan menandatangani surat dan melakukan segala
apa yang perlu dan berguna untuk kepentingan pemberi kuasa, asal tidak dilarang
 atau bertentangan atau melanggar Undang-Undang dan bila perlu penerima kuasa
dapat memindahtangankan kekuasaannya itu sebagian atau sepenuhnya kepada
orang lain (hak substitusi) dengan hak untuk menarik kembali pemindahan kuasa yang
telah diberikan itu.
3. Penerima kuasa boleh melakukan upaya hukum dari pengadilan tingkat pertama
sampai dengan tingkat kasasi.

Jakarta Selatan, 16 September 2005

Penerima Kuasa, Pemberi Kuasa

Annisa Nur Wijayanti, S.H., LLM., Nadafa Paundra, S.T

 POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned below:
Name : Nadafa Paundra, S.T
NIK : 123342492429i
Occupation : President Director of PT. Makmur Sentosa
Address : 25 Kerucut Street, Matraman, East Jakarta, DKI Jakarta

Hereinafter referred to as the PRINCIPAL, in this case, elects domicile of authority as

mentioned below, grants specific power to:
----- Annisa Nur Wijayanti, S.H., M.H. -----
As a lawyer at HHR Lawyers located at 46 Kawi Raya Street, Setiabudi, South Jakarta,
Special Capital Region of Jakarta; hereinafter referred to as the ATTORNEY-IN-FACT.

---- SPECIAL ----

In this matter, acts for and on behalf of the PRINCIPAL, Nadafa Paundra, S.T., as the
President Director of PT. Makmur Sentosa, intends to file a lawsuit against Sabar Setiawan
as the Director of PT. Semangat Bangun residing at 10 Kembarang Street, Semarang, Central
Java, regarding non-performance of obligations under a legally witnessed credit agreement
by Notary PPAT Vina Maulina S.H., M.Kn., on September 15, 1999.

The ATTORNEY-IN-FACT is granted rights and authorities, including:

1. To act on behalf of the PRINCIPAL before the Semarang Court as the chosen court of
the parties, as well as any institution or individual;
2. The Attorney-in-Fact may create and sign documents and perform all actions
necessary and useful for the interests of the PRINCIPAL, provided they are not
prohibited or contrary to the law. If necessary, the Attorney-in-Fact may transfer their
authority, in whole or in part, to another person (substitution right) with the right to
withdraw the previously granted power of substitution.
3. The Attorney-in-Fact may take legal action from the first-instance court to the appellate
level.
South Jakarta, September 16, 2005
Attorney-in-Fact, Principal

Annisa Nur Wijayanti, S.H., LLM., Nadafa Paundra, S.T

MATERIAL - 1
Perihal : Gugatan Wanprestasi

Kepada Yth. Ketua Pengadilan Negeri Semarang

Di Semarang, Jawa Tengah

Dengan hormat,

Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini Annisa Nur Wijayanti, S.H., LLM., Advokat pada Kantor
Advokat HHR Lawyers, berkantor di Jalan Kawi Raya Nomor 46, Setiabudi, Jakarta Selatan;
yang dalam hal ini berdasarkan surat kuasa khusus tanggal 16 September 2005, bertindak
atas nama Nadafa Paundra, S.T., selaku Direktur Utama PT. Makmur Sentosa, bertempat
tinggal di Jalan Kerucut Nomor 25, Matraman, Jakarta Timur, DKI Jakarta;
Selanjutnya mohon disebut sebagai PENGGUGAT;

PENGGUGAT dengan ini hendak mengajukan Gugatan Wanprestasi di Pengadilan Negeri

Semarang terhadap:
Sabar Setiawan selaku Direktur PT. Semangat Bangun yang bertempat tinggal di
Jalan Kembarang Nomor 10, Semarang, Jawa Tengah
Adapun dasar-dasar gugatan Penggugat adalah sebagai berikut:
1. DUDUK PERKARA
a. Bahwa semula Tergugat adalah Direktur Utama PT. Semangat Bangun yang
bedomisili Jalan Kembangan 10, Semarang, memerlukan pinjaman uang bagi
perusahaanya di bidang Teknik;
b. Bahwa Nadafa Paundra, S.T., dengan segala itikad baik meminjamkan uang atas
nama PT. Makmur Sentosa kepada Tergugat sehingga Nadafa Paundra, S.T. dan
Tergugat membuat perjanjian di hadapan notaris Vina, S.H., M.Kn., pada tanggal
15 September 1999.
c. Bahwa dalam perjanjian tersebut, diketahui bahwa Nadafa Paundra, S.T.,
meminjamkan uang sebesar sebesar Rp. 20 Milyar (dua puluh miliar rupiah) yang
harus dikembalikan dalam waktu 5 (lima) tahun sejak perjanjian tersebut dibuat.
d. Akan tetapi, setelah lewat tenggang waktunya/masa perjanjian yaitu 5 (lima) tahun
tersebut, ternyata pihak Tergugat tidak menunjukan itikad baik melunasi
pinjamannya kepada PT. Makmur Sentosa dengan berbagai alasan, antara lain
krisis moneter dan kerugian yang dialaminya sehingga perdagangan lesu.
2. DALAM PROPOSISI
Bahwa Tergugat ternyata bermaksud untuk melepaskan tanggung jawabnya untuk
membayar kewajibannya kepada Penggugat, yang mana dengan tidak dipenuhinya
tanggung jawab tesebut oleh Tergugat maka dapat merugikan secara materiil
terhadap Penggugat.

Berdasarkan hal-hal yang telah diuraikan di atas, maka dengan ini Penggugat
memohon kepada Ketua Pengadilan Negeri Semarang untuk memeriksa perkara ini,
dan kemudian berkanan kiranya untuk memberikan putusan sebagai berikut:

PRIMAIR
1. Menerima dan mengabulkan gugatan Penggugat untuk seluruhnya;
2. Menyatakan bahwa Perjanjian Kredit 15 September 1999 antara Penggugat
dengan Tergugat adalah sah dan mengikat terhadap Penggugat dan Para
Tergugat.
3. Menyatakan bahwa Tergugat telah melakukan perbuatan wanprestasi sehingga
menimbulkan kerugian kepada Penggugat.
4. Menghukum tergugat untuk memenuhi isi perjanjian 15 September 1999 dengan
segala konsekuensi yuridisnya.
5. Menghukum Para Tergugat untuk membayar uang ganti rugi imateriil sebesar Rp.
300.000.000,00 (tiga juta rupiah) kepada Penggugat selambat-lambatnya di dalam
14 (empatbelas) hari terhitung sejak putusan perkara ini memiliki kekuatan hukum
tetap.
6. Menghukum Tergugat untuk membayar biaya perkara.

SUBSIDAIR
Mohon putusan seadil-adilnya.

Semarang. 20 September 2005.

Hormat takzim Penggugat berikut kuasanya,

Annisa Nur Wijayanti, S.H., LLM.

Material – 2
This is my first working experience
1. Working in a law firm can provide opportunities to build a diverse client base and
network, collaborate with different industries, and specialize in particular legal
areas. Additionally, some lawyers view law firms as a path to career advancement,
with the potential to attain partner or leadership roles.
2. I am determined to work as a lawyer with the goal of achieving a bright career
future. In my professional journey, I am not only striving to expand my knowledge
and experience as a lawyer but also carrying out my tasks with dedication. I believe
that the efforts I am putting in now will help lay a strong foundation for achieving
greater career goals in the future. By focusing on applying my knowledge and skill
development, I hope to make the most of every opportunity that arises to succeed
as a lawyer in the future.