100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote) 137 views12 pagesProfile Macchi MC 202
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
PROFILE
aie see Ws CO942The Mac
by Gianni:
Macchi C.202 Folgore of 1° Stormo, 6° Gruppo, 79° Squadriglia
One of the major obstacles facing Italian aircraft
designers in the years immediately before W.W.II,
was the lack of a suitable liquid-cooled, in-line
engine of sufficient power to satisfy the growing
aerodynamic needs of fighter aircraft. A strange
situation when one considers the brilliant successes
gained by the Italian Schneider Trophy racers powered
with FIAT and Isotta-Fraschini in-line engines.
Abroad, the lessons of combining an in-line engine
with a streamlined airframe were absorbed by aircraft
designers, in particular Willy Messerschmitt and
Reginald’ Mitchell. In England Mitchell refined the
design theme initiated with the Supermarine Schneider
Trophy machines, and perfected it until it culminated
with the superlative Spitfire. Messerschmitt produced
the angular, but functional, Bf 109 powered by the
Daimler-Benz engin:
But the Italian aircraft industry ignored the in-line
‘engine’s potential and the more bulky radial gained
pre-eminence. It was not until the opening months of
1940 that the Macchi Company imported a specimen
of the Daimler-Benz DB 601 in-line engine from
Germany, and around it the Macchi design team
built the M.C.202 fighter.
The new fighter was a private venture by Macchi,
and their Chief Designer, Mario Castoldi, took full
advantage of previous ‘experience of the in-line
engine installation gained by the company with their
series of racers—the M.39, M52, M.67 and the
M.C.72. The last named ‘gained’ the World Air
Speed Record in 1934 when clocking 441 m.p.h.
Based on the well-tried and proved M.C.200 air-
frame of 1938 vintage, the new fighter proved to be a
thoroughbred, the prototype making its first flight on
10th August 1940, with Macchi’s brilliant test pilot
Com. Carestiato at the controls.
The first fights confirmed the calculated perfor-
mance figures, and the new machine retained the
control harmonisation and finger-tip manceuvrability
Of its predecessor. The 202 also enjoyed an exceptional
climb rate, behaved well at altitude and was more than
60 m.p.h, faster than the 200, Thanks to a certain
degree of inter-changeability of structural parts and
tooling with the 200 (already well established in pro-
duction) the 202 could be built in quantity in a short
time.
The private venture of Macchi aroused the interest,
of the Italian Ministero del” Aeronautica, and not only
chi G.202
i Cattaneo
a, Libya, January 1942. (Photo: G. Cattaneo)
was the M.C.202 ordered into series production, but
an important programme of licence production’ was
organised with assembly lines at the Breda Company's
plant near Milan in addition to the mother company’s
Varese factory and a wide network of sub-contractual
work
Supplies of the German Daimler-Benz engine in
quantity were promised, at least on paper, direct from
Germany to meet initial needs, and arrangements
made for the licence production in Italy by the Alfa
Romeo Company under the designation of R.A.100
R.C.41, Eight months after the contract was signed
for the 202 the first production aircraft began to
appear. In the intervening period the prototype was
undergoing intensive testing at the Guidonia Experi-
mental Centre to evaluate the potentialities of the new
design
With the M.C,202 the Italian fighter units had at
last got an aircraft of international standard, with
capabilities similar, and often superior to, the most
modern types employed by the opposing forces
engaged by the Regia Aeronautica. Also, the M.C.202
was without doubt the most effective fighter used in
quantity by the Italian Air Force in W.W.II, and it
maintained its service record up to the Armistice in
September 1943, despite the introduction of more
advanced Allied fighters late in 1942 which possessed
superior speed and armament, In an effort to get on
par with the new Allied machines a progressive de-
velopment of the Folgore was the C.20SV Veltro,
virtually a 202 with a more powerful Daimler-Benz
engine. Only a few were built and they arrived too
late to alter the outcome of the war for Italy.
THE FOLGORE DESCRIBED
‘The M.C.202 was an interceptor fighter of all-metal
construction and was initially armed with two 12:7
mm. (0°5-in.) calibre machine guns located in the
engine cowling and synchronised to fire through the
airscrew arc. This chronic armament deficiency,
characteristic of Italian fighters, was improved on the
Series VI* Folgote with the introduction of two 7-7
mm. machine guns (0-3-in.) in the wings.
‘Aerodynamically the Folgore (Lightning), as the
new fighter was soon named, was of clean and well
balanced proportions. Of robust construction it
featured flush-riveting on all surfaces and careful
attention had been paid to detail streamlining in an
"Series ofthe M.C.202 were identified with Roman numerals from Ito Xt. 3effort to reduce parasitic drag. The engine cowling
had a well-balanced profile which ran in a smooth line
from the propeller spinner to the cockpit canopy, the
latter being faired into the rear fuselage.
Fuselage structure was a semi-monocoque shell
consisting of four light alloy beams with ovoidal
bulkheads and stringers forming a particularly robust
unit. The engine bearers of steel tubing in the first
series were soon replaced by two cleanly-designed
forged elements of light alloy in later aircraft. The
central section of the wing was built integral with the
fuselage and carried the outer wing fittings and the
main fuel tank. The pilot's seat was adjustable in
height and length and was fitted with integral armour.
{The shape of the head-fairing permitted a limited
Gegree of rear vision, but provided excellent protection
in the event of the Folgore nosing over on the ground.
Immediately behind the cockpit was located the radio,
the various systems and the auxiliary fuel tank.
‘The wing was a bi-longeron structure attached to
the fuselage centre section by steel forgings; the
leading edge was replaceable as a complete’ unit
Macchi C.202 of 75° Squadriglia, Libya, March 1982.
Hop: Machi ©.202prosonpe( MIs)
before application of camouflage scheme
Photo ‘below shows same aircraft it
camowlage scheme and. national ine
Signa, (Photos: G. Cattaneo and Ace
Macchi)
from the landing gear station to
the wing tip. Flaps, of metallic
structure, were of the split type
and the metal-framed fabric-
covered ailerons were statically
and dynamically balanced.
Fixed tail surfaces were all
metal, whilst the movable surfaces
were fabric covered. The stabiliser
incidence was adjustable in flight,
To compensate for propeller
torque the port wing, while of the
same profile and root chord as the
starboard wing, was of slightly
wider span and smaller tip chord,
The landing gear was inwards
folding with hydraulic action and
equipped with oleo-pneumatic
shock absorbers in the main wheel
struts. The tailwheel, retractable
only on the prototype, was fixed
on production aircraft and partially enclosed by
suitable fairings. Some aircraft lacked the rear fairing,
Instrument array was adequate and the radio
‘equipment included a direction finder. The gun sight
was of the reflector type. Engine starting was electric
or, alternatively, manual with an inertia system. The
fuel system included the main fuselage tank of 60 Imp.
gals. capacity, two tanks in the wing roots of 9 Imp.
gals. each and a supplementary rear fuselage tank of
18 Imp. gals. capacity. All tanks were self-sealing,
‘The oil radiator was placed under the nose and
the cooling liquid radiator under the fuselage, the
latter equipped with a variable position flap 'with
hydraulic action. The M.C.202 was equipped with an
‘oxygen system, cabin ventilation and heating systems;
armament and Pitot tube being heated electrically.
‘The aileron, elevator, flaps and rudder controls were
actuated through push-pull rods and only the control
of the adjustable stabiliser was via cables. The flaps
control was connected to the hydraulic system of the
landing gear.
The two fuselage guns carried 360 rounds each andTop: Macchi C.202, Series 1 (MM-
7702). Below: Macchi C.202, Series
IAS. (MM7805). (Photos: G. Cat
taneo)
the wing guns 500 rounds each.
The armament installation was
completed by a pneumatic re-arm-
ing. system and round counter
indicators in the cockpit
From 1941 to 1943 about 1,500
M.C.202s were built, 392 by’ the
parent company and the rest
under licence by Breda, spread
‘over eleven very similar series. The
Folgore was changed little during
production and only minor differ-
ences distinguished the sub-series.
Among the most noticeable modi
fications the following can be
recorded:
‘Two different types of tailwheel
structures and relating fairings.
Two different models of gyro
instruments with Venturi under or
on the right side of the fi
‘The wing guns installation.
Two types of radio set with different antenna mast.
Installation of dust-filters for use in the desert.
The last modification was soon introduced on the
production line and the most conspicuous detail was
the characteristic faired ram-air entry of the super-
charger. As usual the aircraft modified for the desert
‘war received the suffix A.S. (Africa Settentrionale) in
the designation,
Only the last series were sometimes equipped with
underwing strong points for jettisonable fuel tan!
22 Imp. gals. each and later 33 Imp. gals.) or for
bombs (110 Ib., 220 Ib. and 330 Ib.). As stated before
the structure was quite strong, as were all fighters
designed by Castoldi, and it was able to take heavy
punishment and perform violent aerobatic manceuyres.
Moreover, the exceptionally clean airframe permitted
high diving speed to be achieved quickly, and the
M.C.202 encountered the effects of the then unknown
compressibility factor.
But the 202 was a pilot’s aeroplane and in the hands
Folgores of 79° Squadriglia in company with Macchi C.200 Saettas.
of an experienced airman was a dangerous adversary,
even for a more heavily armed opponent,
SERVICE BEGINS
The first unit to receive the new fighter was the I
Stormo C.T., its 6° Gruppo and 17° Gruppo transferring
to Udine in the summer of 1941 for conversion
training. By November of that yearthecomplete Stormo
was in Libya, participating in the last stages of the
British campaign that led to the raising of the blockade
around Tobruk, and to the retreat of German and
Italian troops in Cyrenaica in late December.
It has sometimes been said that the late arrival of
the 1° Storm's 202s in Cyrenaica was a contributing
factor to the success of the British offensive. Loss of
Axis air superiority enabled the R.A.F. to harass the
Germanj/Italian ground forces, and there is little doubt
that the 202 might have helped stem the tide had it
been available in quantity and in time. But it would
have been hazardous to commit a semi-trained unit,
equipped with a new aeroplane, into a major battle.
(Photo: G. Apostolo)Top: Macchi C.202, 52° Stormo, 2°
Gruppo, 369° Squadriglia. (Photo: G.
Apostolo). Bottom: C.202 of 131
Squadrigita, 51” Stormo,
The North African terrain was not
conducive to easy serviceability,
and the Folgore may have proved
more of a liability than an asset.
Home-based Folgores, how-
ever, performed magnificently,
and ‘the inevitable period of iron:
ing the bugs out of the new fighter
‘was accomplished in comfort due
to the availability of facilities.
Every new aireraft type always
presents its users with some prob-
lems during the early months of
service and the 202 was no excep-
tion. But faults were rare, and
after a short period of “running-
in” the new machine was able to
takes its place as the premier front-line fighter.
When the British offensive ground to a standstill in
the first few days of January 1942, the Folgores of /°
‘Stormo were deployed at Tamet (17° Gruppo) and Ara
Fileni (6° Gruppo), and the most successfull period for
the Folgore was about to begin.
Other units were busily re-equipping with the new
fighter—in November 1941 the 9° Gruppo of the 4
Stormo C.T., in December the 10° Gruppo of the same
‘Stormo. Originally destined for Libya, the 4° Stormo
‘was transferred in April 1942 to Sicily to take part in
the spring offensive against Malta. However, heavy
demands on the Folgore for the North African Front
resulted in the 4° Stormo being transferred from
Sicily to Libya in May 1942. During the same period
a detached section of the photo-reconnaissance
M.C.202 was formed in Sicily and based at Castele-
trano.
The second offensive against Malta lasted from
March until April 1942 and did not succeed in
objective—to neutralise the island and to force the
Royal Navy to use Gibraltar as the main Mediterran-
ean base. The Luftwaffe was responsible for the
major portion of the offensive, but the Italian units
using the 202 performed well against the defending
Hurricanes and Spitfires, the latter arriving on the
island via the carriers Eagle in March and Wasp the
following month.
‘The opening of the great offensive that led the
Italian and German forces under General Rommel’s
command to within sight of Alexandria began in
January 1942. Benghazi was occupied on 29th
‘Macchi C.202s, Series II, awaiting delivery at the Macchi factory in early 1942.
removing the immediate Allied threat
Following a lull in February the offensive gained
new momentum in March, and the Folgores of
‘Stormo were in the forefront of the advance. The 3°,
8° and 150° Gruppos had the advantage of the
Hurricanes and Tomahawks of the Desert Air Force
for their 202s could turn inside both fighters, and only
the Spitfire had a marginal advantage in’ climbing
speed over 15,000 ft. In May the /° Stormo was joined
by the 4° Stormo from Sicily and both were deployed
at Martuba. The third phase of the offensive started on
26th May, opening with the successful strafing of
Gambut airfield by 59 Folgores. Results were very
good. Accompanied by the Bf 109s of the Afrika Korps
the Folgores were particularly active, escorting
bombers against the fortress of Tobruk and on free
interdiction missions along a rapidly fluctuating
front line,
The Axis advance finally petered out at El Alamein
‘on 30th June, one of the main reasons being problems
of supply over long and exposed routes. The Axis
advance had been rapid, and although’ the flying
units were able to bring with them certain essential
supplies, bulk deliveries had to come by road behind,
the advance. For this purpose two columns of
yehicles followed the Axis ground forces to keep up
with the progressive occupation of airfields, carrying
supplies for five days fighting. At the eve of the battle
of El Alamein Folgores were with the 4° Stormo at
Fuka, with 23° Gruppo (3° Stormo) at Abug Aggag
and with the 150° Gruppo at Benghazi. The 1° Stormo
had been transferred back to Italy in June. The 4
. Cattaneo)
(Photo: viawate
Folgores of 54° Stormo, 152
374 Squadrigha.
Gruppo,“ Asso Dt Bastoni”,
(Photo: G. Apostolo}
Stormo, one of the most famous of Italian fighter
units, distinguished itself particularly during the Axis
advance and notched up its S00th victory from the
time it began operations in 1940.
THE RETREAT IN AFRICA
‘The events of El Alamein in October 1942 a
progressive retreat of the Axis from Libya until final
defeat are too well known to be retold here, but suffice
it to say that the Folgore was always in the midst of
the bitter fighting, trying unsuccessfully to stem the
enormous flow of Allied armour, aircraft and men.
The 202s suffered from lack of fuel, spares and re-
placements and by January 1943 only a handful
remained, serving with the 3° Stormo (this unit took
over the surviving 202s of the 4° Stormo) and a squad-
ron of the 13° Gruppo C.T.
From January to December 1942 the Italian fighter
units performed a total of 23,555 sorties, about 30%
of which must be attributed to the M.C.202. Theaverage
monthly efficiency of the Folgore on the Front varied
from a minimum of 30 aircraft in January to a maxi-
mum of 74 aircraft in September.
The necessity of supplying the vital base of Malta
and reinforcing the British Forces in Egypt resulted
ina series of furious aero-naval battles in the summer
of 1942 between the bombers of both the Italian and
German Air Forces, the guns of the Allied convoys
and the few Allied fighters based on Malta. M.C.202s
and Re.2001s based in Sicily escorted the Ju 87s and
the S.M.79s attacking the Allied ships. During one
furious battle 202s of the 155° Gruppo encountered
the Sea Hurricanes and Fulmars of the escort carriers
‘Macchi C.202s, 4° Stormo, 10° Gruppo, 90° Squadriglia, Libya, Summer 1942.
and came away successful, and during other battles
in August Folgores fought Spitfires and Beaufighters
based on Malta.
SERVICE IN RUSSIA
In September 1942, to supplement the small Italian
Air Force that operated in the Russian theatre from
late summer 1941, a number of B.R.20s and M.C.20.
were sent to the U.S.S.R. The heavy demands of the
Mediterranean. war permitted the despatch of only
twelve M.C.202s, which were attached to the 2/
Gruppo C.T. (256°, 382° and 386° Sq.), equipped
mainly with M.C.200s transferred from Italy
Spring 1942. The precious Folgores were equally
distributed among the squadrons of the groups.
These units participated in the offensive of the VII
Armata towards the Don river and occupied succes-
Sively the airfields at Voroscilovgrad, Millerovo and
Kantemirovka. The Italian fighters encountered the
Soviet Yaks and LaGGs and supported the troops
with strafing actions, With the coming of winter "42-43
the Russian counter-offensive developed with tremen-
dous effectiveness and the M.C.200s and 202s were
used in relieving actions against the spreading
Russian columns. The Italian pilots, not numerous
and with equipment unfit for the difficult conditions
of the place, received on many occasions the acknow-
ledgements of the German High Command; the last
strafing sortie was performed on 17th January 1943
by 25 aircraft in the Millerovo area, helping some
surrounded German troops. From August 1941 to
January 1943 the fighters of the 22° Gruppo C.T.
(M.C.200) and later the 27° Gruppo C.T. (M.C.200 and
202) accomplished a total of 6,361 escort, offensive
Sweep, ground support and strafing sorties. The
Russian aircraft shot down were 88 and the Itali
fighters lost in the battle and for various causes were
15.
With the development of the first great amphibious
operation in the European theatre, Operation Torch,
into the occupation of French North Africa and the
expulsion of the Axis forces from Tunisia, some
deployments were effected in order to bring’ as far
westwards as possible the bases from which the
German and Italian fighters contested the Allied
advance. The 153° Gruppo and the 17° Gruppo, with
24 and 33 Folgores respectively, were transferred from
Sicily to Sardinian airstrips.’ Offensive sorties by
Re.2001 fighter-bombers over the harbours of Bone
and Bougie were escorted by M.C.202s, and part of
the 155° Gruppo was transferred to El Alouina to help
(Photo: G. Cattaneo)cover the landing of
Italy. By February 1943 the Folgore-equi
Gruppo at §
and the /6° Gruppo on K34 and
K4l; total strength was $5 M.C.202s, far below the
theoretical strength of a force of this size.
In this period occurred the first combats with Ameri-
can pilots of the USAAF 12th Air Force, the Folgores
encountering on many occasions the P-38 Lightnings
of the Ist and 14th Fighter Groups, the P-39 Aira-
cobras of the Sist and 350th Fighter Groups, and
Spitfires of the 31st and 52nd Fighter Groups. The
M.C.202 enjoyed a certain superiority against the P-38
especially in turning radius and climb rate, while the
Airacobras were no match for the Folgores at all and
were soon relegated to ground attack duties. In all
cases, however, the interior armament of the M.C.202
was apparent.
In March the 7° Gruppo C.T. artiyed in Tunisia,
joining the 16° Gruppo in the new 54° Stormo. In
May came the defeat of the Axis forces in Tunisia,
which was itself only a prelude to the invasion of
Sicily and the Italian mainland and the Armistice of
eptember 1943. During these months the M.C.202
units, supplemented by the few available M.C.205s
and Re.2005s, were heavily committed to interceptor
duties against’ the mass formations of B-17s and B-24s
‘Tunisia comprised the 6
‘Stormo at El Hamm
Top of page: Production
Folgores Series IX, under-
‘going final checks’ before
{sue to squadrons. Note
how. the “upper surface
‘Scheme comes 10 an ent
tinder the leading edge of
ining. (Photo: via G. Cat
anes)
instru
Macchi
Close-
up of Folgore engine
Cowling “reveals blister
air intakes and gin
troughs. (Photos! via G:
Cattaneo)
8
Immediate right
‘ment panel -of
C202." Far right
as Palermo, Naples, Reggio
Italian cities, as well as Si
M.C.202s scored numerous victories in these actions
despite the heavy fighter escort forces; and their record
is all the more creditable considering the great disparity
between the opposing forces and the inevitability of
defeat
THE LAST MONTHS
In July 1943, prior to the invasion of Sicily, the
M.C.202 equipped the following units: the first figure
refers to assigned aircraft and the second to service-
able machines
2 Stormo
Lonate Pozzolo 15 II
¥ Stormo CI Corvete 1 4
21° Gruppo C.T. Firenze Min ot
22° Gruppo CT. Capodichino 16 9
51° Gruppo C.T Monserrato 2B 2
28 Gruppo CT. Venafiorita 19 10
# Stormo CT. Catania 38 12
161° Gruppo C.T. Reggio Calabria 1811
2 Gruppo CT. Chinisia 12 6
153° Gruppo C. Palermo a
158 Gruppo C.T. Rhodes 9 6Bigne lnstallaion of Trea TRGh sack ate
a carr pices fc workronshp ot Meceht akon
Broa Goan)
Hence a total of only 100 serviceable Folgores were
dispersed over the whole of Italy. Most of the units in
the South were annihilated during Operation Husky
of later destroyed on the ground by Allied air attack.
However, the Italian and German fighter forces flew
690 and ‘500 sorties respectively during the first ten
jays of July 1943 over the airfields of Sicily, and Allied
losses were quite considerable. The Allies lost approxi-
mately 375 aircraft and the Axis approximately 270;
but it w. tional swan song of the M.C.202
ng the experimental chin radiator
The Italian industry made a great effort to make good
the losses caused by the last actions in Italy; but by
the Armistice only 122 Folgores were dispersed around
the country from the South to the Alps, and of these
machines only 53 were serviceable. Some reached the
Allied-held sectors and were incorporated
into the
Co-Belligerent Air Force; in particular these
used by the X° Gruppo of the 4° Stormo and by the
new 5° Stormo, soon re-equipped with Airacobras.
Those aircraft which reached the Northern airfields
MM91974 was tested with underwing mounted 20-mm. Mauser M.G. 151 cannons.
The Macchi C.202 (MM7768) was fitted with a chin radiator, but increased drag lead 10 the rejection of the project.
(Photo: Aer Macchi, via G.
Cattaneo)were taken on the strength of the R.S.I. Air Force, but
due to a certain availability of M.C.205s and Fiat
G.55s they were only used for training purposes. Two
examples of the Folgore survived the war and were used
at Lecce training school up to 1947, kept in condition
by enthusiastic ground crew who “scrounged
spares from aircraft graveyards all over Southern
Italy.
Ground crew re-toadin se magazine of a Macchi C.202
ote personal insignia on cowling. (Photo: G. Cattaneo)
eme displayed by a C.202, believed to be
Stormo, Libya, Summer 1942.” (Photo! G. Cattanco)
photographs of C.202s and a C.200 taken in the field in
Summer 1932. (Photos: via G. Cattaneo)
Above: Folgore, believed 3
(Photo: G- Cattaneo) Below
Stormo, Libya, Summer 1942
insignia of 31° Stormo,
(Photo: via Richard Ward)
Flight Test Data at Maximum Weight of 6,306 Ibs.
a) Maximum speed at height of
Sea level 305 mapchi 3,280 fe. 319 mapih.: 6560 fe. 334 map
94840 fe, 349 mpeh.: 13,120 fe. 362 mph; 16,405 fe. 372 mph
19,685 fe. 362 mph
b) Absolute max. speed: 372°2 m.p.h. at 19,360 fe
©) Minimum speed: 86.8 m.p.h. at sea level
4) Climbing time to:
3,280 fe. 34'sec.; 6,560 fe. | min. 19 sec
13,120. 3 min. 27 see; 16,405 fe. 4 min. 40sec
13's0e
©) Take off run: 827 f.
f) Landing run: 771 fe
9,840 fc. 2 min. 26 sec.;
19,685 Fe. 6 min
2. AER. MACCHI C202
‘Typical Result of an Official Acceptance Test Series a/c
MiM.9486.
Maximum weight:
weight: 5,196 Ibs.
3) Maximum speed and time to climb to:
Sea level 308 m-p-h.; 3,280 fe. 320 m-p.h. $2 sec.; 6,560 ft. 332
mm.p.h. | min, 48 sec.: 9,840 fe. 343 mph. 2 min. 47 sec; 13,1204
354 m.p.h. 3 min. 49 sec.; 16,405 fe. 363 mp.h. 4 min, 57 see,
19,685 ft. 367 m.psh. 6 min, 26 sec.
b)’ Service ceiling: 34,600 fe.
©) Range with $31 ibs. of fuel: 475 miles at 20,130ft. at 267 mp.
4d) Max. dive speed (starting from 20,130 fe): 475 mpche at
8,330 fe
3. AER. MACCHI C.202OFFICIAL SPECIFICATION
(Cota from Technical Manual C.A. 670)1— Series 1V-VIN of "Mini-
Stero dell’Aeronautice".)
Powerplant: One Alf Romeo R.A. 1000 R.C.4I1, twelve cylinder,
inverted vee, rated at 1075 H.P. at 2,500 r-p.m. for take-off and
1040 H.P. at’ 2.400 r-p.m.—Piaggio P.1001 constant speed pro-
peller, three blades, diamever 987 fe
Dimension: Wing span 34710 fe; Wing area 180-834 sq. fe
Root chord 21-097 fe: Tip chord (iofe) 4087 fe: Tip chord (right)
4.268 fe; Length 29.035 fe; Height 11-450 fe
Weight: Empty: 5.491 Ibs. Useful load: 968 ibs. of which, Pilot
176 Ibs.; Rounds 167 Ibs.; Fuel $52 lbs.; Oil 73 ibs,
Total loaded 6,459 Ibs.
Performance: (at maximum weight 6,459 Ibs.)
Max. speed and time co climb to:
Sea level 309 m.p.h.; 3,280 fe, 324 m.p.h. 39 sec; 6,560 fe 338
psh. | min. 28 sec.: 9,840 fe. 352 m.p.h. 2 min. 28 sec; 13,120"
364 m.p.h. 3 min. 32 sec.; 16,400 fe. 370 m.p.h. 4 min. 40 sec.
19,685'fc.365'm ph. 5 min. 55 sec.; 22,965 fe, 363 mpc.
‘Absolute max. speed: 373 m.p.h. at 18.370 f¢. Service ceiling
37,740 fe. Uleimate loading coefficient: 15:8
‘Armament: Two 127 mm. cal. Safat machine guns with 360
rounds each. Provision for two 7-7 mm. cal. machine guns with
500 rounds each in wings,
6475 Ibs. Useful load: 1,279 Ibs. EmptyM.Ca02 Folgore, 363 Sq, C.T., 150 Gruppo C7.
S2Stormo C-T., Benghazi, Libya, July 1942,
Fuselage Fasces tnsign
150 Gruppo, 53 Stormo.
4 Stormo cow! marking
4 F Bara
€, 369 Sq, C7. 22 Gruppo C-T., $3 Stormo CT, a
Dy Caposichine (Noples Z e
>
4 Stormo, a
“Cavallino r
Rampante Py : a
4, 99,91 Sa, M.c.202 Folgore, 81 Sq. C.T., 6 Gruppo idle routes
v €7., 1 Stormo €.7., | Tamet, Libya, a
RE) rca
me 4
M.C.m2 Folgore, 91 Sq. C:7., 10 Gruppo C.T. e
4 Stormo CT, Libya, May 1942,
. 4 Stormo, “Cavallino
M.C.202 Folgore, 97 Sq. CT. a Rampante” 73, 96, 97 Sq
Goat of Arms of the 9 Gruppo C.T., 4 Stormo
>
House of Savoi
M.C.202 Folgore, 368 Sq. CT,
152 Gruppo C.., Sardinia,
M.C.202 Folgore, 374 Sq, C.T.,
153 Gruppo C7.
Tunisia,
j Spring 1943
Aone Tee 153 Gruppo,
372, 373, 374 Sq
152 Gruppo,
368, 370 Sq
wake ow
51 Stormo,As stated above, few modifications were introduced
during the operational life of the M.C.202. Only two
speciall prototypes are known; the first was the M.C.
202D (serial MM 7768) in which a new position for
the radiator was tested under the engine. The increased
drag cancelled the advantages of the simpler cooling
pipe system and the installation was not repeated. The
other experimental type was the airframe numbered
MM 91974, with a trial installation of two 20 mm.
Mauser cannon in pods under the wings.
The production of the M.C.202 was hampered
Four guns were installed in MM7731, finished dark green upper surfaces with a yellow nase band.
(Photo: G. Cattaneo)
throughout its life by the extreme scarcity of engines;
the Italian industry was unable to provide more than
40 or 50 powerplants per month at best in the R.A.
1000 series and part of this output was reserved for
the Re.2001, The German contribution can only be
described as miserly. Despite this handicap, the sleek
Folgore was one of the most interesting’ machines
produced in quantity by the Italian aircraft industry;
despite the inevitable distortion of facts by wartime
propaganda, it was beloved by its pilots and highly
respected by all its adversaries.
UNITS OF “REGIA AERONAUTICA” EQU
"ED WITH M.C.202 FIGHTER AIRCRAFT
‘Note: The Units very seldom reached the nominal strength in number of aircraft.
Gruppo Stormo
6 '
rus), 54 368-370"-371
® ‘9 77-78-82:
¥ 4 73-96"-97
10 4 84°-90"-91
13 r 97°-93'-94
16 54
ra f 1
is 3 83'-05°-95)
20 SI 351°-352"-353
21 sir 256'-382'-386
2 2 359-362-369"
2B 3 ”
cy 52! 354"-355"-370
150 33 363°-364°-365:
153 372-373-374
154
155, sr 351°-360°-378°
161 162-163-164
Date Location
Dee. 1941 Tamer (Libya
Jan. 1942 Aer lint ibys)
Feb. 1943, Stax (Turisia)
March 1943 Canisia
July 1943 Sarzana (Italy)
April 1942 ici)
ay 1942 Martuba (Libya)
July 1943 Catania (lealy)
April 1942 (ici)
Pay 1940 Marevba (Libya)
July 1943 Catania (aly)
Sept. 1943 Venafiorita (aly)
Feb. 1943, K34-K41 (Tunisia)
Nov. 1941 Tamet (Libya)
Nov. 1942 (Sardinia)
Nov. 1942 Taourga (Libya)
July 1948 Cerveter (ely)
July 1948 Monserrato (lly)
Summer 1942 Voreseiloverad(Russia)
uly 1943 Chinisa iealy)
Sepe. 1943 Gioia del Corfe (ely)
July 1943 Capodichino (ely)
June 1942 Gia
Aug. 19 ‘Abu-Ageae (Libya)
july 198 Clamprno tkaly)
Sept. 1943 Metato (Italy)
July 1942 Benghazi (Libya)
Sepe. 1942 ici
Nov. 1942 fre
July 1943 Rhodes (Aegean)
May 1942 (Sicily)
Now. 1942 EV Alouina (Tunisia)
July 1948 Reggio C. (aly)
PRINTED IN ENGLAND. © Profile Publications Led,
for MeCorquodale City Printing Division, London.
bby George Falkner & Sons Led
10, Box 26, Leatherhead, Surrey, England,