MACH8006 - LAB 2

Name: GOUTHAM AYKKYATHIL-8390076

Prerequisite: Completion of assigned readings.

Items needed:
 Tools to record data

 A set of standard SAE and/or metric gage blocks

 Numbered metal cubes to measure, all of which are less than one
inch in length, width, or height. See the Appendix for typical
examples.

 Vernier-scaled calipers and height gages

 Calipers and height gages from multiple sources are beneficial but not necessary.

 A set of dial or digital calipers may be used by the students to confirm

EXERCISE 1
Observation:
Familiarize yourself with the measurement you were given. Your instructor will review and
demonstrate the proper procedure for using these instruments. What measurement errors
may occur with improper use?

Yes, the measurements will vary, because there are many possible ways to get the
measurements errors with improper use.

The possible errors are 1-Incorrect zero settings: this is a common error while using the
vernier calipers, if the vernier is not set to proper zero this error will occur.
2- Parallax error: This is an error that occurs when the observer's eye is not properly aligned
with the measurement scale.
3- Not reading the vernier scale correctly
4-Incorrect handling
5-Dirty or damaged instruments

EXERCISE 2
Measure:
Using the instructor-supplied block, measure the length, width, and height of the block.
Record your measurements. When everyone is finished, compare the readings. Are they the
same? Why or why not? Discuss possible reasons for any variations.

No, our readings had variations compared to other groups. When we measured the readings,
the diameter of 2 was 47.42mm, the diameter of 1 was 95.48mm and the depth was 82.46mm.
The other groups' measurements were 95.2mm, 47.22, and 82.7 for depth respectively.
From these 2 measurements, it is clear that measurements have variations for both groups.
We got around 0.20mm extra for all the readings.

These variations are occurring because of the earlier mentioned factors such as incorrect zero,
parallax error, incorrect handling, damaged vernier or not reading the vernier correctly.
 MACH8006 - LAB 2
Name: GOUTHAM AYKKYATHIL-8390076
Date: 10/10/23

EXERCISE 3
Measurements:
In your group, measure and record the length, width, and height of the cubes provided by
your instructor. Keep a detailed record of what measurements correspond to each specific
dimension for each student.

In the case of the 2nd figure, the measurements were,

h1 - 37.60mm

h2 – 62.06mm

h3 – 82.7mm

h4 – 101.20mm
 MACH8006 - LAB 2
Name: GOUTHAM AYKKYATHIL-8390076
Date: 10/10/23

Diameters were,

d1 – 76.08mm

d2 – 57.00mm

d3 – 47.74mm

d4 – 31.86mm.

The measurement taken by another group.

H1 – 37.68mm

H2 – 63mm

H3 – 82.02mm

H4 – 101.2mm

D1 – 76.06mm

D2 – 57.3mm

D3 – 47.7mm

D4 – 32.7mm

These measurements were acquired with a height gauge as well as a vernier caliper. The
cylindrical cubes' heights (h1, h2, h3, and h4) were measured using a height gauge. To do this, the
height gauge was calibrated on top of a flat surface, then the height of the cubes was measured by
moving the measuring hand up and down, and the exact measure of the cubes was magnified using
a lens. Following that, a vernier caliper was used to measure the diameter of the cubes, just as it
was done with the cylindrical block.
 MACH8006 - LAB 2
Name: GOUTHAM AYKKYATHIL-8390076
Date: 10/10/23

EXERCISE 4
Pair up with another group, measure, and record the cubes' length, width, and height. Now,
calculate the mean, median, and mode based on the dimensions found by both groups. Then,
compare the deviation from exercise 3 and explain why there is variation.
Mean od Heights:
H1 = (37.60+37.68)/2 = 37.64mm
H2 = (62.06+63.00)/2 = 62.53mm
H3 = (82.00+82.02)/2 = 82.01mm
H4 = (101.20=101.38)/2 = 101.29mm

Mean of Diameters:
D1 = (76.08+76.06)/2 = 76.07mm
D2 = (57.00+57.30)/2 = 57.15mm
D3 = (47.74+47.70)/2 = 47.72mm
D4 = (31.86+32.70)/2 = 32.28mm

Median of heights
H1 = (37.60+37.68)/2 = 37.64mm
H2 = (62.06+63.00)/2 = 62.53mm
H3 = (82.00+82.02)/2 = 82.01mm
H4 = (101.20=101.38)/2 = 101.29mm

Median of Diameters:
 MACH8006 - LAB 2
Name: GOUTHAM AYKKYATHIL-8390076
Date: 10/10/23

D1 = (76.08+76.06)/2 = 76.07mm
D2 = (57.00+57.30)/2 = 57.15mm
D3 = (47.74+47.70)/2 = 47.72mm
D4 = (31.86+32.70)/2 = 32.28mm

REPORT

Observations: After evaluating the values within our group and comparing them to others, it
was found that there was some inaccuracy. A few things were discovered after chatting with
each group that might help with enhancing measurement accuracy and reducing error. Some
of the observations are listed below:

Consistent approach: Reading differences can be lessened by ensuring that everyone in the
class uses a standardized and uniform technique of using measurement devices.

several measures It is feasible to increase the precision and reliability of the data and correct
for any potential abnormalities or errors that might have happened during the individual
measurements by performing many measurements and averaging the findings.
 MACH8006 - LAB 2
Name: GOUTHAM AYKKYATHIL-8390076
Date: 10/10/23

The misalignment of the eye or the measuring scale may result in a parallax mistake .

Conclusion: Finally, it's critical to emphasize the value of paying close attention to every
single detail and exercising prudence when utilizing measurement instruments. By locating
and removing probable sources of error, the precision and dependability of the measurements
can be enhanced. Furthermore, the uniformity of the results across class members points to
some degree of precision in the measures. But it's important to remember that even small
deviations can have a big influence, especially in applications like precise engineering or
manufacturing. Therefore, it is advised to apply standardized measuring methodologies,
ensure proper viewing angle, proper handling of equipment, and incorporate repeated
measurements to enhance the accuracy and dependability of the results.
 MACH8006 - LAB 2
Name: GOUTHAM AYKKYATHIL-8390076
Date: 10/10/23