0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views5 pages

Dinda B DKK 2003 - Steroid and Nitro Phenol Esters From B.unguis-Cati Roots

1. β-sitosterol cerotate (1) and 2-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethyl stearate (2) were isolated from the roots of Bignonia unguis-cati. 2. The structures of the compounds were elucidated through spectroscopic analysis and chemical studies. β-sitosterol cerotate (1) hydrolyzed to yield β-sitosterol and cerotic acid, confirming it as a steroidal ester. 3. 2-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethyl stearate (2) hydrolyzed to yield 2-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethanol

Uploaded by

Septynelya Thenu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views5 pages

Dinda B DKK 2003 - Steroid and Nitro Phenol Esters From B.unguis-Cati Roots

1. β-sitosterol cerotate (1) and 2-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethyl stearate (2) were isolated from the roots of Bignonia unguis-cati. 2. The structures of the compounds were elucidated through spectroscopic analysis and chemical studies. β-sitosterol cerotate (1) hydrolyzed to yield β-sitosterol and cerotic acid, confirming it as a steroidal ester. 3. 2-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethyl stearate (2) hydrolyzed to yield 2-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethanol

Uploaded by

Septynelya Thenu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Indian Journal of Chemistry

Vol. 42B, June 2003, pp. 1 5 14- 1 5 1 8

Steroid and nitro phenol esters from Bignonia unguis-cati roots


b
B iswanath Dinda*, Utpal Chandra De, Basudev Acharia , Shiho Arimab , Nariko Sato b & Yoshihiro Harigaya
Department of Chemistry, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar 799 1 30, India

E.mail: dindabtu @rediffmail.com

aDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata 700 032, India
bSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1 08 864 1 , Japan

Received 21 February 2002; accepted (revised) 1 January 2003

Two new esters, I)-sitosterol cerotate 1 and 2-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethyl stearate 2 have been isolated from the
roots of Bignonia unguis-cati (Bignoniaceae) and their structures are elucidated by spectroscopic and chemical studies.

4
Bignonia unguis-cati L. syn. B. gracilis Lodd syn. and 4.5 Hz, H-6) suggesting an sterol ester skeleton .
Doxantha unguis Miers (Bignoniaceae), an American This was supported by the appearance of base peak
species is grown in Indian gardens for its use in tradi­ ion at mJz 396 in the ElMS resulting from the loss of
tional system of Indian medicine l . The roots are used acid residue by McLafferty cleavage. The ElMS also
in the treatment of ulcers. Earlier investigations on recorded some mass peaks at mJz 777(M-Me, 5),
23
aerial parts of the plant reported . the presence of la­ 763(M-Et, 8), 749(M-43, 1 0) , 456( 1 5), 424( 1 2),
pachol, ceryl alcohol, j3-amyrin, j3-sitosterol, octaco­ 4 1 3(8), 397( 1 00), 3 8 1 (396-Me, 1 7) , 370(34), 35 1 (4),
sanol, tectoI and ellagic acid. We i nvestigated the 342(20), 288(5), 276( 1 0) , 2 1 4(7), 148( 1 2), 60(4),
roots of this plant and isolated two new compounds - 57(42), 43(34), which were characteristic of steroid
s6
j3-sitosterol cerotate 1 and 2-( 4-hydroxy-3- fragmentation (Scheme l) . . The mass peak at mJz
nitrophenyl)ethyl stearate 2. In this paper, we wish to 424 was characteristic of ""S steroid7. The strong mass
report the i solation and structure elucidation of these peak at mJz 397 suggested the presence of cerotic acid
compounds. 3 as an acid residue. The alkaline hydrolysis of 1 with
I N methanolic KOH gave j3-sitosterol 4, C29 H SOO (M+
Results and Discussion 4 1 4), mp 1 3 8°C and cerotic acid (hexacosanoic acid)
The ester 1, j3-sitosterol cerotate, mp 93°C ana­ 3, C26Hs202 (M+ 396), mp 88°C (litS mp 88-89°C).
lysed for CSSH O002 , showed in the UV spectrum in Both the products of alkaline hydrolysis were identi­
I
MeOH an absorption at Amax 247 (log E, 3.6 nm) char­ fied by comparison of their I H NMR spectra9 as well
2
acteristic of unsaturated compound . It showed posi­ as by direct comparison (m mp and co-TLC) with au­
tive Liebermann-Burchard colour reaction (pink thentic samples. Therefore, the structure of 1 was elu­
colouration) suggesting its steroid nature. The IR cidated as j3-sitosterol cerotate.
spectrum of 1 showed the presence of ester carbonyl Phenolester 2, C26H43NOs, mp 97°C showed in UV
( 1 735 c m- I ) and olefinic ( 1 635 cm- I ) functions. The spectrum in MeOH absorptions at Amax 258 sh (log E,
400 MHz I H NMR spectrum of 1 in CDCl3 showed 4.04) and 270(4.06) nm and in MeOH+OR at Amax
the presence of two primary methyls (8 0.82,3H,t, 295 nm characteristic of ni trophenols I . The IR spec­
1 = 7.5 Hz, Hr29; 0.84, 3H,t, 1 = 7 .5 Hz, Hr26'), three trum of 2 in KBr pellet showed the presence of in­
secondary methyls (8 0.87, 6H, d, 1 = 6.5 Hz, H 3 -26 tramolecularly bonded hydroxyl (3200 cm' I ) , ester
and 27; 0.92, 3H, d, 1 = 6.5 Hz, H 3 -2 1 ), two tertiary carbonyl ( 1 730 cm' l ) and aromatic nitro ( 1 540 and
methyls (8 0.68, 3 H,s, H 3 - 1 8 ; 1 .02, 3H, s, Hr 1 9), me­ 1 330 cm' l ) functions. The IR bands at 1 625 , 1 580,
thylene and methine protons (8 0.75-2. 1 5 , m), one 1 5 1 8 and 1 460 cm, l also suggested its 1 ,2,4-
methylene adjacent to ester carbonyl (8 2.27, 2H, t, trisubstitutions on the aromatic ring. The 400 MHz I H
1 = 7 .5 Hz), one methine (8 4.62, I H, m, W I /2 1 6.0 Hz, NMR spectrum of 2 in CDCh displayed signals of
H-3) and one olefinic proton (8 5 .37, I H, dd, 1 = 4.5 one methyl (8 0.88, t, 1 = 7.5 Hz), eighteen methyl
DINDA el aL. : STEROID AND N ITRO PHENOL ESTERS FROM BIGNONIA UNGUIS-CA T! ROOTS 1515

29

�C"'C"'N'"
5
CHJ(CHili4COOH
3

26 l
' CHJ(C�h6COOH
1 R = C�(CH2 )z4CO-
4 R=H 7

18 1
2 R' = CH:3(C�)16CO-
6 R' = H 12 0


396 II r=
C H:3(C �h4-C -O� .
+

......
. _.. - 276
CH,(C O-
mJz 424
35 1

Scheme I. Mass fragmentation of 1

1 4. 1 (q, C- 1 8) suggested the presence of stearoyl moi­


enes (& 1 .24, brs, 1 4 X CH2 ; 1 .56, distorted t, J = 7.5
ety. The HMBC experiments (Table I) also con­
Hz, �-CH2 with respect to ester carbonyl ; 2.28, t,
firmed the assignments of proton signals in the alco­
J = 7.5 Hz, -CH 2 adjacent to ester carbonyl; 2.93 , t,
hol moiety of 2. Compound 2 on alkaline hydrolysis
J = 7.5 Hz, benzylic CH2 ; 4.27, t, 1 = 7.5 Hz, -OCHr),
with I N methanolic KOH gave 2-(4-hydroxy-3-
three aromatic protons(& 7 . 1 1 , d, 1 = 8.0 Hz, H-5';
nitrophenyl)ethanol 6 [C gH9N04 (M+ 1 83)] as pale
7 .45, dd, 1 = 8.0 and 2.0 Hz, H-6' and 7.97, d, 1 = 2.0
yellow needles, mp 65°C and stearic acid 7 [C lgH3602
Hz, H-2') and one phenolic hydroxyl proton (& 1 0.49,
(M+ 284)] as granular crystals, mp 69°C (lit8 mp
s, exchangeable with D 2 0, HO-4') suggesting 2-(4-
7 I .5°C). Compound 6 was synthesised from p-cresol
hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethyl ester structure for it. The 2
by methylation 1 with dimethyl sulphate in the pres­
chemical shift values of aromatic protons were as­
ence of anhydrous K2C03 followed by nitration with
signed on the basis of NOE correlation experiments. 2
nitric and sulphuric acids mixture, formylation1 with
The NOE enhancements were observed at & 7.97, 7 .45
formaldehyde gas and demethylation 1 3 of the formy­
and 4.28 when irradiated at & 2.93, while the NOE
lated product (Scheme II). The synthetic product 6
enhancement was only observed at & 2.93 when irra­
was identical (m mp, and co- TLC) with the hy­
diated at & 7 .97 . Similar 'H NMR chemical shift val­ droxynitrophenyl ethanol, obtained from alkaline h � ­
ues were reported for 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenethyl­ drolysis of 2. Therefore, the structure of 2 was elUCI­
amine 5 isolated from Cereus validus " . The carbon dated as 2-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethyl stearate.
signals in the 1 00 MHz I 3 C NMR spectrum of 2 at &e The biological activity of the compounds 1 and 2 will
1 73.6(s, C- l ), 34.3(t, C-2), 24.9(t, C-3), 29. 1 (t, C-4), be studied later on. It may be noted that earlier anti­
29.3(t, C-5), 29.4(t, C-6), 29.5 (t, C-7), 29.6(t, C-8), tumour nitrophenanthrene derivative 12 has been re­
29.7(t, C x 7, C-9, 1 5), 3 1 .9(t, C- I 6), 22.7(t, C- 1 7) and ported from A ristoLochia bracteata l 4 .
1516 INDIAN J . CHEM., SEC B , JUNE 2003

I - HMBC NMR data of 2 (alcohol moiety) in CDCI)

Carbon HMBC Carbon HMBC


Table

be be

I' 1 30.4(s) H-2', H-6', H-7' 5' 1 20. I (d) H-6', HO-4'
2' 1 24.7(d) H-6 ', H-7 ' 6' 1 38.3(d) H-2', H-5', H-7'
3' 1 33.4(s) H-2', H-5', H-O-4' 7' 33.9(t) H-2', H-6', H-8'
4' 1 53 .9(s) H-2', H-5', H-6' 8' 63.9(t) H-7'

8 9

11

6
II-Reagents and conditions: (i) (CH)hS04/K2CO) in Me2CO (ii) HNOfH2S04 in ice bath (iii) HCHO gas in THF; CaO (iv)
Separation by CC of IO HI/Red P in AC20, tl..
Scheme

..

Experimental Section column with petrol-C6H6 (4: 1 ) elUate gave a residue


General. All solvents were distilled before use. which on repeated CC afforded 1 in colourless nee­
Silica gels (Merck) were used for column and thin 3
dles (0.03 g, yield, 3.7 x 1 0. %), [Rj, 0.60 in petrol­
layer chromatography . UV, IR, MS and NMR spectra C6H6 (4: 1 ) mixture on silica gel G]. Anal. Found: C,
were recorded on Spectronic 2 1 0, Perkin-Elmer 577, 82.90; H, 1 1 .98. Calc. for C55HIO002: C, 83.26; H,
Jeol JMS-AX 505H and Varian XL 400 spectrome­ 1 2.70%.
ters, respectively. GC was carried out on Pye Unicam Elution of the column with petrol-C6H6 (6:4) gave
1 04 gas chromatograph. Petrol used had the bp 60- a residue which on repeated crystallisation from pet­
80°C. rol-C6� mixture afforded 2 in brown granular crys­
tals (0.025 g, yield, 3 . 1 x 1 0. %), (Rj, 0.45 in C6H6 on
3
Plant material silica gel G). Anal. Found: C, 68.92; H, 9.60; N, 2.74.
The roots of Bignonia unguis-cali were supplied by Calc. for C26H43N05 : C, 69.45 ; H, 9.64; N, 3. 1 2%.
MIs United Chemical and Allied Products, Calcutta in
Alkaline hydrolysis of 1 . Compound 1 (0.01 g)
October 1 999. A voucher specimen has been pre­
served in the herbarium of Shibpur Botanical Garden, was dissolved in 1 0 mL of I N KOH in MeOH and
was refluxed for 2 hr in an atmosphere of N2. The re­
Howrah, West Bengal, India.
action mixture was concentrated and extracted with
Extraction and isolation CHCh ( 1 0 mL x 3). The combined CHCh extract was
Air dried milled roots (0.80 kg) of B. unguis-cali washed with H20, dried over anhydrous Na2S04, con­
were extracted with EtOAc in a Soxhlet-type extrac­ centrated and subjected to Cc. Petrol-C6H6 ( 1 :2) elu­
tor. The extract was concentrated to a residue (3.5 g) ate gave colourless needles of 3, mp 1 38°C (0.003 g).
by distillation under reduced pressure. The residue The aqueous part of the reaction mixture was neutral­
was extracted with CHCh and the CHCh soluble part ised with IN HCI and extracted with Et20 ( 1 0
was concentrated and subjected to Cc. Elution of the mL x 3). The combined ether extract was washed with
DINDA et al. : STEROID AND NITRO PHENOL ESTERS FROM B1GNON1A UNGUlS-CA Tl ROOTS l S 17

H 20, dried over anhydrous Na2S04 , concentrated and 6.66(2H, d, 1 = 8.0 Hz, H-3,5) , 7 .02(2H, d, 1 = 8.0 Hz,
chromatographed. C6 H 6-CHCl) (6: 1 ) eluate gave 3 as H-2,6).
colourless granular crystals, mp 88°C (0.003 g). Synthesis of 4-methoxy-3-nitromethylbenzene
3: IH NMR (COCI) : 0 0.80(3H, t, 1 = 7.0Hz, CH) , 9. Compound 8 ( 1 .0 g) was dissol ved in 3 mL of
1 .2S(44H, brs, 22 x CH 2 -), 1 .62(2H , quintet, 1 = 7.0 conc. H2S04 in an Erlenmeyer flask and was cooled
Hz, �-CHr), and 2.34(2H, t, 1 = 7.0Hz CH2CO-) in ice-bath. To it 2 mL of conc. HNO) was added
4: I H NMR (COCI) : 0 0.68(3H, s, H3- I 8). dropwise with shaking. After addition of HNO), the
0.8 1 (3H, t, 1 = 7.0Hz, H3-29), 0. 86(6H, d, 1 = 6.S Hz, reaction mixture was kept as such for another I S min
H)-26, 27), 0.92(3H, d, 1 = 6.S Hz, H)-2 1 ), 1 .02(3H, s, and then poured in ice cold H20 (30 mL) and ex­
H)- I 9), 0.7S-2.26(29H, m,-CH2, >CH) , 3.S0( 1 H, m, tracted with CHCh ( 1 0 mL x 3 ) . The CHCh extract
H-3), S.34( l H, brdd, 1 = 4.S and 4.S Hz, H-S ). was washed, dried over anhydrous Na2 S 04 , concen­
Alkaline hydrolysis of 2. Compound 2 (0.0 1 2 g) trated and chromatographed. Elution of column with
was dissolved in I OmL of I N KOH in MeOH and the C 6H6-CHCI) (S: 1 ) gave 9 as brown semi-solid (yield
solution was refluxed for 3 hr in an atmosphere of N2 . 0.70 g , 70%). ' H NMR (COCh) : 0 2.26(3H,s, H3C­
The reaction mixture was concentrated, diluted with I ), 3.82(3H,s, CH30-4), 7 .08( l H,d, 1 = 8 .0 Hz, H-S ),
H20, neutral i sed with I N HCI and extracted with 7.44( 1 H, dd, 1 = 8.0 and 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7 .98( l H , d,
Et20 ( 1 OmL x 3). The combi ned ether extract was 1 = 2.0 H z, H-2).
washed with H 2 0, dried over anhydrous Na2 S04 , con­ Synthesis of 2-(4-methoxy-3-nitrophenyl)ethanol
centrated and chromatographed. Elution of the col­ 10. Compound 9 (O.SO g) was dissolved in THF
umn with C6H6-CHCI3 (6: I ) gave 7 as granular crys­ ( 1 0 mL). To it SO mg of anhydrous CaO was added
tals (0.004 g), mp 69°C. Elution of the column with and HCHO gas was passed by heating paraformalde­
C6H6-CHCI3 (4: 1 ) gave 6 as pale yellow needles hyde for I S min. The cooled reaction mixture was
(O.OOS g), mp 6S°C. fi ltered and washed the residue with a little THF. The
6: UV(MeOH ): 278.8(\ogE, 3.64)nm; IH NMR combined fi ltrate was concentrated and chromatogra­
(COCI3): 8 2.83(2H, t, 1 = 7.S Hz, H2-7), 2.38( 1 H , brs, phed. Elution of the column with C6H6-CHCI) (3: 1 )
exchangeable with 020, HO-8), 3 .92(2H, t, 1 = 7.5 eluate gave 10 as dark brown crystals (yield 0.07g,
Hz, Hr8), 7. 1 O( l H, d, 1 = 8.0 Hz, H-S), 7.46( l H, dd, 14%), mp SS°c. 'H NMR (COCI3): 0 2 .34( 1 H, brs,
1 = 8.0 and 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7 .94( 1 H , ct, 1 = 2.0 Hz, H-2), exchangeable with 020, HO-8), 2.82(2H, t, 1 = 7.0
10.SO( l H, s, exchangeable with 020, HO-4). Hz, benzylic CH2 ), 3.84(3H, s, CH30-4), 3.89(2H, t,
7: IH NMR (COCI3): 0 0.84(3H, t, 1 = 7.S Hz, CH) , 1 = 7.0 Hz,Hr8), 7. 1 4( 1 H, d, 1 = 8.0 Hz, H-S),
1 .2S(28H, brs, 1 4 x CH2), 1 .63(2H , quintet, 1 = 7.S Hz, 7.S0( 1 H,dd, 1 = 8.0 and 2.0 Hz, H-6), 8.02( l H, d,
�-CH2-)' 2.34(2H,t,1 = 7 .S Hz, -CH2CO); ElMS rnIz 1 = 2.0 Hz, H-2). Elution of the column with C6H6-
(%): 284(M+, 20), 2S6(M-28, 4S), 24 1 (M-43, 7), CHCl) (2: 1 ) gave 1 1 (2-methoxy-S-methyl-3-
239(M-4S, 6), 227(M-S7, 8)224(M-60, 7), 7 1 (94), nitrophenyl)methanol as brownish semi-solid (yield
60(S6), S7( 1 00), 43(86). Methyl ester was identical O.2Sg, SO%). ' H NMR (COCI3): 0 2.28 (3H, S , CH3-
with an authentic sample of methyl stearate on GC S), 2.60( l H , brs, exchangeable with 020, -OH),
analysis under the same condition using PEGA col­ 3 .82(3H, s, CH30-2) , 4.82(2H, s, H 2 C- 1 ), 7.S4( 1 H , d,
umn (inj. port, column and FlO temperatures were 1 = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 8 . 1 2( l H, d, 1 = 2.0 Hz, H-4) .
200°C, 1 90°C and 2 1 0°C, respectively ; N 2 at the flow Synthesis of 6. Compound 10 (O.OS g) was dis­
rate SO mL/min and chart speed 320mrnlhr). solved in 3 mL of AC20. To this solution I .S mL of
Synthesis of 4-methoxymethylbenzene 8. p­ H I and SO mg of red P were added and the mixture
Cresol ( 1 .2 g) was dissolved in dry acetone (20 mL). was refl uxed for 2 hr. The cooled reaction mixture
To it S mL of (CH3hS04 and 1 00 mg of anhydrous was fi ltered and the residue washed with a l ittle
K2CO) were added. The resulting mi xture was re­ Ac20 and the combined filtrate was concentrated and
fluxed for 4 hr using CaCl2 guard tube. The cold mix­ diluted with H20 and extracted with CHCh ( 1 0
ture was filtered and the residue was washed with ace­ mL x 3). The CHCl3 extract was washed with H20,
tone. Evaporation of the acetone solution gave an oily dried over anhydrous Na2 S 04 , concentrated and
residue which on column purification afforded 8 chromatographed. Elution of the column with C6H 6-
(yield 1 . 1 g, 92%) as viscous liquid. I H NMR CHCh (2: 1 ) gave 6 as pale yellow crystals (yield
(COCI) : 8 2.2S(3H,s, H3C- 1 ), 3.84(3H,s,CH3 0-4), 0.03g, 60%), mp 6S°C.
1518 INDIAN J . CHEM., SEC B, JUNE 2003

5 Tokes L, Jones G & Djerassi C, J Am Chern Soc, 90, 1968,


5465.
Acknowledgement
6 Tokes L & Djerassi C, J Am Chem Soc, 9 1 , 1969, 5017.
7 Diekmann J & Djerassi C, J Org Chern, 32, 1967, 1 005.
The authors wish to thank Prof. B C Ranu, lACS,

8 Weast R C, Hand Book of Chemistry and Physics, 57th edn,


Kolkata, for I H NMR spectra and RSIC, Lucknow,

(CRC, Ohio), 1976, p c33 1 , 402.


India for microanalysis. One of the authors (U C D) is
9 Pouchert C J & Campbell J R, ALdrich Library of NMR spec­
thankful to the CSIR, New Delhi, India for the award
tra, (Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Aldrich Chern Co.), 1975.
10 Silverstein R M, Bassler G C & Morril l T C, Spectrometric
of a Senior Research Fellowship.

Identification of Organic Compounds, 4th edn, (John Wiley,


1 Rastogi R P & Mehrotra B N, Compendium of Indian Medici­ New York), 1981, p 324.
References

nal Plants, Vol 4, (CSIR, New Delhi), 1995, p 1 04. I I Neme G, Nieto M, D' Arcangclo A T & Gros E G, Phyto­
2 Joshi K C, Singh P & Sharma M C, J Nat Prod, 48, 1985, 1 45. chemistry, 1 6, 1977, 277.
3 Mukherjee K S, Ghosh P K, B hattacharya P & Mukherjee R 1 2 Fieser L F & Fieser M, Reagents for Organic Synthesis, (John
K, J Indian Chem Soc, 64, 1987, 1 29. Wiley, New York), 1967, pp 295, 397.
4 Asahi Research Centre Co, Tokyo, Hand Book of Proton 13 Deulofeu V & Guen·ero T J, Org Syn CoLIn, Vol. 3, 1955,
NMR Spectra and Data, Vol. 5 , (Academic Press, Tokyo), 586.
1986, p 400. 14 Husain F T, PLanta Medica, 1 8, 1969, 30.

You might also like