0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 53 views67 pagesColdwarbook
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
"| SUDTON POCKET HISTORIES
| PRISCILLA ROBERTSSUTTON POCKET POCKET HISTORIES
THE COLD
WAR
PRISCILLA ROBERTS
SUTTON PUBLISHING
A OF py,
x ay,
&
z
=
a
*
*
ae ®
“anneb2HSOIS
16 DEC 2002
For my parents
The two bravest people I know
First published in the United Ki
Sutton Publishing Limited -
Thrupp « Stroud - Glouce
ingdom in 2000 by
Phoenix Mill
shire - GL5 2BU
Copyright © Priscilla Roberts, 2000
All rights reserved. N
reproduced, stored j
form or by
© part of this publication may be
na retrieval
‘stem, or transmitted, in any
any means, electronic, me:
recording or otherwise, without the
publisher and copy,
chanical, photocopying,
prior permission of the
right holder,
Priscilla Roberts has a
sserted the mor
the
al right to be identified as
author of this work.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is avail
lable from the British
Library,
ISBN 0-7509-2437-3
Cover picture: Military Parade on Red Square, Moscow,
1 May 1968 (N. Sitnikov/1 ASS, courtesy Jonathan Falconer)
Typeset in 11/14 pt Baskerville,
Typesetting and o
Sutton Publishing
Printed and boun,
J-H. Haynes & Co,
rigination by
Limited.
din England by
- Ltd, Sparkford,
Contents
List of Dates
Map | Postwar allianc
Map 2 Postwar alliance
Africa
Introduction
The European Dime
Korea to Vien:
The Quest for Superpower U nderstanding,
1974
the Far East
“urope, North
the Middle East
hsion, 1945-1959
am, 195
Resurgence to E
Conclusion
Further Reading
Index
nding, 1973-199]
46
71
95
100
104November 1917
July 1918
November 1918
April 1920
April 1933
: November 1933
August 1939
September 1939
May 1940
June 1941
August 1941
December 1941
November 1943
’ June 1944
August-October
1944.
February 1945
April 1945
May 1945
June 1945,
July-August 1945
August 1945
February 1946
List of Dates
Successful Bolshevik revolution in ‘Ts
Allied intery
ist Russia
ntion in Russi
States participates
First World War ends in
in Which United
armistice
aws last troops from Russia
nklin D. Roosevelt becomes US president
United States recognizes Soviet Union
et Non-Aggression Pact
rmany and $
and Fi
viet Union invade Poland; Britain
ice declare war on Germany
Germany invades Soviet Union
Atlantic Charter
Japan attacks P
Japan declare w:
‘arl Harbor, and Ger
‘ar on United States
Teheran conference
D-Day:
Wai
many and
Anglo-American inva
asion of Europe
UW uprising
Yalta conference
Death of Fi
Ath of Franklin D, Roosevelt; successor as US
President Harry . Truman
Surrender of Germany
San Fra 1
sn Francisco conference approves United Nations
Charter
Potsdam conference
Atomic
nic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and
sakis Japan sure!
; Pan surrenders; Ho Chi Minh declares
namese independence
George
* Kennan sends Long Telegram
iv
ee
LIST OF DA
March 1946
March 1947
June 1947
July 1947
September 1947
October 1947
February 1948
March 1948
April 1948
May 1948
June 1948
April 1949
May 1949
August 1949
September 1949
October 1949
January 1950
April 1950
June 1950
November 1950
April 1951
September 1951
January 1
March 19:
June 1953
Churchill's Iron Curtain spy
zes Soviet behaviour towards
United States eri
withdraw forces from Iran
Iran and
Truman Doctrine speech
Treaty of Dunkirk between Britain and F
Announcement of Marshall Plan: t
of Soviet Conduct
Kennan article,
ource
Rio Treaty to defend Western Hemisphere
Cominform established
Communist coup i hoslovakia
Brussels security pact of five West European powers
Organization of American States established
ion of Isracl; immediately recognized by
Soviet Union and United States
Berlin blockade begins
North Adiantic Treaty
Berlin blockade ends
y signed
Soviet Union tests atomic bomb
Federal Republic of Germany established
, led by Mao Zedong,
ina on Chinese
Chinese Communist P:
s People’s Republic of
procla
mainland
-aty of Alliance and Friendship
utor Joseph R. McCarthy makes Wheeling,
ng of McC
Virgit rthyism
YSC 68 recommends massive American
4, speech, begins
rearmament
North Korea invades South Korea; United States
successfully urges United Nations intervention
Chinese intervention in Korean War
Formation of European Coal and Swel Community
gnature of Japanese-American peace treaty and
S Pact
security treaty and AD
Dwight D. F
Death of Stalin
nhower becomes US president
Panmunjom armistice agreement effectively ends
vya
August 1953
September 1953
December 1953
March 1954
May 1954
June 1954
July 1954
September 1954
December 1954
January-April
1955,
April 1955
May 1955
June 1955,
July 1955
November 1955
February 1956
October 1955
November 1956
January 1957
March 1957
LIST OF DATES
United States concludes security tre;
with South Korea
Workers uprising in
assistance
st Berlin crushed with Soviet
ClA-backed coup overthrows Mohammed
Mossadeq’s government in Iran and restores Shah
Reza Mohammed Pahlavi II to power
Nikita Khrushchev becomes general secretary of
Soviet Communist Party
Eisenhow
1's ‘Atoms fe
Successful United S\
Vietminh de!
* proposal
s testing of hy
at French army at Dienbienphu;
French decide to leave Indochina
Successful ClA-backed coup
government
Geneva
Jrogen bomb
against Guatemalan
accords end First Indochina War,
ea ‘Moning Vietnam into North and South
Wan security treaty
First Quet
rst Quemoy-Matsu (Qinmen-Mazul ‘Taiwan
straits crisis
Bandung conference
West Germany j
Soviet Union es
Creation of Bag
of neutral nations
bins NATO
‘ablishes Warsaw Pact
d hdad Pact, later CENTO
enhower makes + Ski
Comes not M#kes ‘Open Skies’ proposal at
eva summit conference
Successful Sovie
Khrushchey
Party's wentieth congress
Soviet Uni
Uni .
on crushes Hungarian uprising
testing of large hydrogen bomb
der es Stali Sui
nounces Stalin at Soviet Communist
Announc
cement of Fi oa
ree Eisenhower Doctrine for Middle
October 1957
February-June
1958
July 1958
August 1958
November 1958
January 1959
May 1960
January 1961
April 1961
May 1961
June 1961
August 1961
October 1961
October 1962
May 1963
August 1963
November 1963
August 1964
October 1964
February 1965
March 1965
April 1965
November 1965
June 1967
LIST OF DATES
Soviet Union launch
2s Sputnik
‘cond Indochina War
Beginning of
isted military rebellion in Indonesia
United States intervention in Lebanon
Second Quemoy-Matsu [Qinmen-Mazu] Taiwan
straits crisis
Khrushchev begins Berlin crisis
Fidel
U-2 incident; Paris summit meeting collapses
tro wins power in Cuba
John F, Kennedy becomes US president
Bay of Pigs landing
Kennedy
ends special forces to Vietnam
Kennedy-Khrushchey summit meeting at Vienna
Construction of Berlin Wall
Announcement of Alliance for Progress
Sino-Soviet split made public
Cuban missile crisis
Sino-Ind
Organization of African Unity established
Nuclear Test Ban Tr
Kennedy assassinated; Lyndon B. Johnson becomes
war
ty signed
US president
Ton!
in handling Vietnam cri
Leonid Brezhnev replaces disgraced Khrushche
Gulf Resolution gives Johnson wide latitude
is
Soviet Communist Party’s general secretary
Heavy United States bombing of North Vietnam
begins
First American combat troops dispatched to
United States military intervention in Dominican
Republic
Beginning of Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
in China
Six-Day War in Middle East
viiJanuary 1968
March 1968
August 1968
January 1969
March 1969
July 1969
October 1969
November 1969
August 1970
July 1971
September 1971
October 197]
December 197]
February 1972
May 1972
December 1972
January 1973
March 1973
September 1973
October 1973
August 1974
September 1974
November 1974
April 1975,
Tet offensive in South Vieam
Johns
n announces United States decision to seck
peace in
ietnam and withdraw
Soviet militar
Brezhnev announces Brezhnev Doctrine
Richard M. Niy
y intervention in Czechoslovakia;
on becomes US president
Sing Gaver t veer
ino-Soviet border clashes on Ussuri River
Nixon announces Nixon Doctrine and begins
reduction of
merican troops in Vietnam
Willi Brandt becomes West German chancellor,
Pursues Ostpolitit
Strategic Arms Limitation talks begin in Helsinki
Brandt and Brezhne
Treaty of Non
Kissinger’
sign Soviet-West German
Aggression in Moscow
secret visit to Beijing
Quadripartite Pact on Be
United N
China
signed
AUONS votes to admit People’s Republic of
Indo-Pakistani War le
Banglade
Nixon visits China, meets Mao Zedong
Nixon—Brezhnev mee
sign the ABM
West and East
Unite
ads to independence for
n
ng in Moscow, where they
SALT
many sign Basic Treaty
d States, South Viet
reach pe:
United
am and North Vietnam
© accord at Par
( tes and PRC agre
in each other’s capitals
President Salvadoy
tnilitary coup
to open liaison offices
Allende of Chile overthrown by
Yom Kippur w;
Nixon's re:
‘ d beginning of oil crisis
ene signation due to Watergate scandal;
ord becomes US president
lassie overthrown in Ethiopia
‘rd summit meeting at Viadivostock
man takes over South Vietnam
viii
oe
August 1975
November 1975
September 1976
January 1977
July 1977
January 1979
February 1979
June 1979
July 1979
November 1979
December 1979
January 1980
August 1980
January 1981
December 1981
June 1982
November 1982
March 1983
October 1983
February 1984
March 1985
November 1985.
October 1986
LIST OF DATES
Signature of Helsinki accords
Civil war begins
Death of Mao %
Jimmy Carter becomes US president
Angola
dong
War between Ethiopia and Somalia over Ogaden
United States and China re-establish full diplomatic
rela
tions
Overthrow of Shah of Iran
nd Carter sign SALTAL Ti
eaty at Vienna
nistas seize power in Ni
ragua
Beginning of Iranian hostage crisis
{invasion of Afghanistan
rter Doctrine to protect Per
Announcement of ( an
Gulf region
Beginning of Polish Solidarity movement
Ronald Reagan becomes US president; American
ed
hostages re
aackdown on
Martial law declared in Poland;
Solidarity
Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) begin in
Geneva
Death of Brezhney; succeeded by Yuri Andropov as
Soviet Communi:
Party general secretary
Reagan announces Strategic Defense Initiative (‘Star
Wars’)
Military intervention in Grenada
Bomb attack on Beirut barracks of United States
on
troops
Death of Andropoy; succceded by Constantin
Chernenko as Soviet Communist Party general secretary
ded by Mikh
al secretary
Death of Chernenke uece il Gorbachev as.
Soviet Communist Party gene
R
Reagan-Gorbachey Rey
agan-Gorbachev Geneva summit meeting
vik summit
meeting
ixLIST OF DAT
eee
November 1986 Exposure of Irar
December 1987 _R
oororse
sontra scandal
an—Gorl
hey Washington summit meeting:
signature of Intermediate-Range and Shorter
Range Missile Treaty
May-June 1988 Reagan
January 1989
February 1989
it to Moscow
George Bush becomes US president
Soviet troops withdrawn from Afghanistan
June 1989 Solidarity wins Polish parliamentary election Ayan ie
Student demonstrations in Beijing provoke June Mp SANDS tre a avo in
4th repression REP. OF CHINA PACIFIC
August 1989 Non-Communist government assumes power in S ae OCEAN
Poland KONG "icone i
September 1989 Hungary reopens borders to W st Cree punuppine sea MARIANA
November 1989 Opening and overthrow of Berlin Wall SoU co a ISLANDS
December 1989 Non-Communist government assumes power in si sea Mes amie Guam ws
Crechoslovakia , ek
Overthrow of Nicolae Ceausescu in Rumania
Bush-Gor bachey
Gorb;
Moscow summit meetin,
chev elected president of Se
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
East and West Germany reunified
November 1990 CSCE conte nce procl
January 199] Persian Gulf War begins
July 1991
March 1999
August 1990
October 1999
ict Union
@ we al
a
ns Cold War's end
INDIAN
Dissolution of Warsaw Pact ucean .
Bush and Gorbachev sign START Treaty |
nets is a ign START-1 Treaty ; ICES: The Far East
gust 199] Military coup against Gorbachev foiled by Boris POSTWAR ALLIAN .
Yeltsin ! EEE Nations having bilateral treaties with U.S
December 1991 CO™PACheY resigns as general secretary FEZ] Members of SEATO
T1991 Soviet Union disbands to become Commonwealth
of Independent States
=|] Communist bloc
lliances: the Far East
Map 1 Postwar al s ait
(From America: A Narrative History by George Browne Copyright ©
1984 by W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. Used by permission of W.W.
eee & Company, Inc.)
xi(From Am
Map 2 Postw:
WY
TAO
ENS son Gout
fen renn op Nez
Fspansetsses ananian SFA
ETHIOPIA S SOMALIA,
ar allian
erica: A Narr ‘ces: Europe, North Africa, the Middle East
‘ative Hi
Y WW. Norton & Con Story OY George Brown Tindall. Copyright © 1984
Company, Inc. Used by p
ermission of W.W. Norton &
Company, Inc.)
xii
Introduction
The term Cold War generally refers to the ideological,
geopolitical, and economic international rivalry between
the United States
terized the period from approximately 1945 to 1991.
and the Soviet Union that charac-
These two states, respectively the world’s leading capital-
ist democracy and its most prominent Communist
nation, were allies during the Second World War, but
within a few years perceived and depicted themselv
as
locked in desperate competition, a conflict in which each
antagonist sought not simply to prevail, but also to win
the adherence of as many other countries as possible.
‘ar continues to haunt the
The heritage of the Cold V
world today, symbolized by the fact that the current
international system has as yet acquired no better
descriptive label than ‘post-Cold War world order’. |
The Cold War began when the successive impact of
the First and Second World Wars had destroyed the
prevailing international order of the early twentieth
century. In 1900 several great European powers, pre-
ish empire, Germany, and
France, together with Russia and a rising power, Japan,
dominated the world. The United States had the
economic potential to join this exclusive club but had
not yet done so. All the great powers were monarchi
eminent among them the Bri
ions, which in
and most had extensive colonial poss
many cases they sought to augment. Western empires
&INTRODUCTION
a
ruled the Middle East, Afr
balance of power existed ar
By 1945 two major wi
sa, and much of Asia. A rough
mong them.
ee ae ‘ars, conflicts that the American
ape e. ‘ ma Acheson among others character-
War years ca Be Uropean civil war’ in which the inter-
=e constituted only , had altered this
ee beyond recognition or possibility of
et: ma of the Fir st World War helped to
ee ee of totalitarian regimes of left
ee a y dedicated to enhancing the lives and
: BSet general populace even
authoritarian controls over
Intellectual matters, [n R S
brought the ove: a 1
Creation of the
Union,
a truc
they imposed
political, economic, and
the First World War
rthrow in 1917 of Tsar Nicholas I and the
world’s f
In Italy in 1923
€xperience an,
dislocations co,
irst Communist state, the Soviet
and Germany in 1933 the war
vent economic and political
substantially to the emergence
Ctively led by Benito Mussolini
tated objectives to restore their
d conseq
ntributed
St regimes, respe
Hider, their S|
international Ste
the sun, anding and win them a place in
The §,
econd World .
Ger tid War, in many respe . p
7erman and Italian ae any respects the result of
tives orts to
, ae accomplish these objec-
ean state:
Class powers. ¢ Pean states to the rank of second-
Ptcy and suffering from
©; While greatly o . ‘
nding of both th © greatly enhancing the
Unio © Unite. 5
kas The nited Siital United States and the Soviet
es! * = cre .
“St economic power = Merged as incomparably the
i y
he world, its industrial plant
xiv
RODUCTION
and superiority decisively enhanced from serving as the
‘arsenal of democracy’ which provided the matériel for
the Allied war effort. Although German in on initially
inflicted se
economic potential and the sheer size of the Soviet
military intimidated its smaller, war-crippled European
neighbours. In Asia the war left Japan devastated and
ere damage on the Soviet Union, Russian
defeated and China gravely weakened and wracked by
internal revolt and economic difficulties.
colonies forceful nationa s, of varying
political complexions, emerged or waxed stronger
In most Asian
st movemen
during the war. These had discredited the European
colonial overlords, depriving them of the financial,
military, and ideological resources to maintain their grip
on their imperial possess
mental systems and international alignments generally
ons, whose future govern-
still remained undetermined.
Historians have disagreed, sometimes bitterly, as to
whether considerations of ideology, national security, or
economic advantage predominated in causing the Cold
War; over which nation, the United States or the Soviet
Union, bore the greater responsibility for its develop-
ment; and on the relative moral merits of the two major
protagonists. The Cold War is perhaps best understood
as the product of an international power vacuum in both
Furope and Asia and of the tensions engendered by the
gradual definition, demarcation, and delineation of a
new balance of power. Much of the world was in flux as a
atly affected by the developing bipolar
new system, g
Soviet-American antagonism which was both a causeINTRODUCTION
pe
and, increasingly, a self-ge:
y ge
nerating consequence of the
Cold War, eme in :
rged incrementally.
place at varying speeds in
throughout the Cold War
always in p: FeRE
fe progress,
This process took
different regions, and
local revisions were nearly
In Europe a stable
over four decades,
Africa, and L
modus vivendi, which endured for
» quickly emerged. In much of Asia,
atin America, by contrast, the situation was
far mor i
e fl 2 res P
a : uid, the result of both the fundamental
Security of numerous e
degree to which the Se
European coloni
Cold War quickly
isting governments and the
cond World War weakened the
al empires. As Europe stabilized, the
j Y shifted its focus from that continent to
: ions, especially Asia
spite the emergence
group of States, th
all international
overriding
and the Middle East.
of a consciously non-aligned
n€ WO great powers tended to perceive
questions. through the prism of their
mutual titi C
competition for predominance. This
tervene in two major
il war which began in
civil war which, in varying
out the three decades from
One Pronour
caution, Major powe:
Other, Despite ,
hostility,
Union sh
that one
iced Cold War feature was the relative
8 displaye
i mutual
in Practice th
ared ce
peae histor}
cers Although
d when dealing with each
protestations of irreconcilable
© United States and the Soviet
oMmMon inte
n has terme
in Korea
Tlain ¢
rests, to the extent
d the period ‘the long
and Vietnam alike both the
anh
xvi
INTRODUC
United States and the Soviet Union a ted opposing
parties involved in direct hostilities, in neither conflict
did either great power ever seriously consider any
outright declaration of war against the other. Indeed, in
both struggles restricting their intervention so as to
preclude such an outcome was a prominent, if tacit,
The successive
preoccupation of both major powers
development of atomic and thermonuclear weapons
enabled each big power to inflict near devastation upon
its rival, but only at the cost of its own destruction.
Consequently, from the mid-1950s onwards the two
launched efforts to reach some under-
atagonis
standing on the use of such weapons. The Cuban mi
of 1962, the occ
seemed most likely, had a sobering €
le
cris
ion when a nuclear exchange
fect on both big
powers and, indeed, on the rest of the world.
Concurrently, the international scene became more
complicated, challenging attempts at bipolar definitions.
As defence budgets soared and innovative technology
grew ever more expensive, attempts to reduce military
spending appeared increasingly attractive. In 1949 the
emergence of a Communist regime in China, a country
with one-quarter of the world’s population, appeared a
major victory for the Soviet camp, one likely to advance
the Communist cause throughout Asia. Yet by the late
1950s growing hostility between China and the Soviet
Union effectively divided the two major Communist
powers, a situation which smaller socialist countries, such
s Vietnam, could often manipulate to their own
advantage. In the late 1960s and early 1970s the United
xvii
oa iINTRODUCTION
al
split,
-ytraeCommunist SP
ite ye intra-Com 4
i eee ‘ clashes in 1969,
-der cl
jet border ¢ Dea
a Soviet Union and
» governt
States successfully
loody Sino='
symbolized by b
; » with both the
a i
to move towards detent nett
People’s Republic of on
saders had previously
included several me om
relaxation of st-Wes
albeit limited,
> China, whose
refusec
arms Jimite
nsions in
rican
the
American Ic
The results
ements, the sino-Ame!
and a de facto,
uropes
f jeriod one
| a
etme 1970: until the mid-IS oe I ie
hawt a Jd Wat 9
From the la cond Co ce
ates ) the ©
i i epmed the 'S' nt post
. an has ter Fiepatetn I a
histor! snsions agai acceleral esse preside
re te ted States of a conse a Pat
i » United St :
jon in the i
a Id Reagan, who vowee
Ronale agian, Who on
ized as the Sovicl = eee
«
further hé urdening of
W
nent of hig
s endorse!
hi
* anti- missile
Wars
anc
a mode rate al
achey,
Mikhail G
proble ms, rapi
War.
first
wih two
” in /- ame
and waa That 5
jistall-
ymittec
the soviet
twO
at
Afgha
as he P&
ver ip
50WE i"
0 tober 990
Oc
mo!
europe
ton
ith the Col
next
tion HW
INTRODUCTION
es
later, in December 1991, the Soviet Union itself dis-
solved, to become the short-lived Commonwealth of ee
Independent States.
As John Lewis Gaddis pointed out in We Now Know
(1997), until the 1990s a Cold War historian inescapably
wrote from the perspective of one living in the era under
discus
ion, a viewpoint which tended — and the pervasive
memories of which sometimes still tend - to make
detached analysis somewhat difficult to attain. Moreover,
until Soviet, Eastern European, and even some Chinese
ns enjoyed
archives began to open in the 1990s, histor’
access — and even that partial — only to Western sources
on the Cold War, making any discu:
pations, mindset, motivation, and policies of Communist
Even now,
ion of the preoccu-
bloc countri
and leaders largely speculativ
much material from both sides of the divide remains
tory of the Cold War will not
closed, and a definitive hi
notwith-
appear for decades, if ever. Yet, such cay
standing, in the year 2000 we can at least begin to escape
from the often overly simplistic and even propagandist
which marred much writing on the Cold War
and look back at the period Richard Crockatt has termed
the ‘fifty years’ war’ with a new understanding of the
complexities and ambiguities which almost certainly
characterized its emergence, development and impact.
analys
xixjoined Bri
ONE
The European Dimension,
1945-1950
Historians have argued over almost every aspect of the
Cold War, including the precise date it began. Some
trace its origins as early as 1918, shortly after Bolshevik
revolutionaries led by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin established a
Communist government in Russia. The United States
in, France, and Japan in sending troops to
Siberia, forces whose stated objective was merely to keep
the tran
Siberian railway line open and protect Allied
supplies near Vladivostock against German seizure. In
practice America’s partners quickly expanded this under-
taking, which lasted until spring 1920, into attempts to
sia. Until 1933 the
United States, unlike other Western powe:
overthrow Communist rule in Ru
refused to
yecognition
remained cool throughout the
recognize the Soviet government. Even afte
Soviet-American relatior
1930s, though d
pite the purges which the dictatorial
Soviet leader Josef Stalin initiated, many leftist W
intellectuals
em
and romantic idealists believed Soviet
Communism offered a political model superior to thatenjoyed by their 0
contrast, feared a
considering it the ¢
free enterprise system,
rights to ‘life, libe
enshrined in the Declaration ©
eligious to boot.
Despite pronour
antagonism and pre
the two powers, it
interests into outright colli
bellicose, behaviour
ingly restive Germar
the
with the Fascist pow
the United States initially a
policies of the Gern
by the Septem
much of Gzect
1939 to a determ
concessions. Stalin,
should the German
viet Union to adopt dif 7
at Britain, Franc
ber 1938 Munich ¢
roslovakia to, Ge
ination to rear
Reich attack So
es. Most Aw
wn countri
nd deplored Soviet
is of th
omplete antithe
destructive of thos'
pursuit of
rty, and the
f Indepen
iced Soviet-American
dominantly cool rel
major war
on. During th
to
took
and territorial dem:
ry and Italy le
ferent S$
ers. Gre
equiiesced in the
nan Fuhrer,
by contrast, was
ja to face Fi
ations D
ands 0
e, and
expansionist
mbolized
c
viet territor
ascist
nericans, by
Communism,
ne Americal
© individual
happiness
dence, and
ideological
erweeD
bring their
1930s the
fin
e
ry:
powers would leave Rus ded N
unassisted. In August 1939 he conclu ed pe East
jon Pact with Hitler, which safeguare comp?
a j attack In @
German frontier agai
recalling the cightee
two signatories also
that state, whose tern
between themselves.
inst Soviet ¢
nth-century pal
agreed to coll
itory separated u
The Non-Aggres
EUROPEAN DIMENSION, 1945-1950
freed Germany to begin the Second World War, counting
the Soviet Union, supposedly a sworn ideological oppon-
ent, as a friendly neutral or even a tacit confederate,
which until 1941 provided Germany with substantial
amounts of war supplies.
The wartime alliance between the United States,
Britain, and the Soviet Union was based decidedly on
not mutual trust. In June 1941 Hitler,
convenienc
having subdived most of Western Europe, including
a, in the
France, the Low Countries, and Scandinav
blitzkrieg launched in spring 1940, chose to invade the
Soviet Union. Following the time-hallowed principle that
the enemy of my enemy is my friend, Britain and the
United States, by this time virtual de facto allies against
Hitler even though the Americans had yet to declare war,
immediately embraced Stalin as a fellow victim of Hitler
Winston Churchill, the dogged British wartime prime
minister, characteristically remarked: ‘If Hitler invaded
Hell he would at least make a favourable reference to the
Devil!’ Russia immediately joined the beneficiaries of the
nd-Lease programme, under which the United
new L
States was already sending war supplies in bulk to other
opponents of Hitler and Japan. After the Pearl Harbor
attack of December 1941, when both Germany and Japan
declared war on the United States, the ‘big three’ powers
were formally allied against Hitler.
Serious strains afflicted their relationship. Although
official propaganda portrayed the three allies as sharing
common objectives, sedulously glossing over the sub-
stantial ideological and practical differences separating
eoTHE COLD WAR
a
ae eae systems, within each country many officials
Reta! ar wary of their supposed confréres.
nance Mien aioe suspected that Britain and
face the oe ht Seniaen peace, abandoning him to
Franklin D ce 7 idler un ted. Churchill and
were similark - ee t thie wartime Ameri
individually, Beer reat that the Soviet Union might
Atlantic ora eas at Peace with Germany. In the
and Roosevelt me: igned in August 1941, Churchill
which included ee their countries to war aims
of nations to eeledSeernitce Four Freedoms’,
economic, and re’
‘an president,
, the rights
— auon and to internal political,
Reeser. glous freedom, but Stalin declined
selinnepeds Sto endorse these objectives. Initially
et Ms o| 7 5 ;
Neendift oe a Anglo-American allies would open a
Breireon its France in 1942, thus relieving the
ie vi is
ae © Soviet forces and populace who faced
man military Den ce dee
Nib F- y unaided. The ; ‘i
Mvasion, first to 1943 oe mine decision foideferithis
3 and the \
believe with some sie then to 1944, caused him to
ficati at hi 7
© expend Russian |iy ‘ation that his allies had chosen
8 Wves to win the war. Soviet wartime
{20 million dead, as well as
Property and industrial plant,
$1941 to 1944 the Soviet wat
absorbed ;
at leas -
German mili ast three-quarters of the effort of the
ilitary machine e effort ol
amounted to at leas;
enormous devastation to
Since over the three yea
zone h
Wa eloAmetican strate
est European invasic,.
intaltestiods a to June 1944 carried important
ference, held in eee Europe. At the Teheran con-
“te 1943, the Allied leaders decided that
Sic decisions to postpone the
THE EUROPEAN DIMENSION, 1945-1950
a
Soviet troops would be left to defeat the German occupy-
ing forces — or in Rumania and Hungary, allied forces
including
which controlled most East European count
Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Rumania, Bulgaria, and
Albania, states which by early 1945 were under de facto
Soviet control. As Soviet military conquest reached into
Eastern Germany, Stalin considered the extension of
Soviet power to Eastern Europe a matter of Soviet national
Twice since 1900, in 1914 and 1941, Germany had
iropean
curit
invaded Russia, and between the wars most E:
and Balkan states were anti-Soviet in orientation, allied
with either France or Germany. By ensuring Soviet domin-
ance of Eastern Europe and the Balkans and keeping
postwar Germany permanently weak, Stalin was deter-
mined to prevent the recurrence of this scenario, plans he
had some reason to believe his allies would effectively
tolerate.
On oceasion in 1943 and 1944 Churchill conveyed to
Roosevelt and other Americans his apprehensions that
: ended an undependable Soviet Communist
when the v
regime, quite possibly hostile to the Western powers,
would dominate much of Eastern Europe, but Roosevelt
generally minimized hi fears, leaving him little alternative
but pr
gmatically to acquiesce in informal understandings
sh power in the Balkans. The
demarcating Soviet and Br
unofficial ‘percentages agreement’ which Roosevelt and
Stalin reached in 1944 placed Greece within the British
sphere of influence, Rumania and Bulgaria within the
Soviet, and acknowledged both British and Sovict interests
in Hungary and Yugoslavia.THE COLD WAR
2
G " ae . ‘
ermany and Poland, the traditional invasion pathway
from Germany into Russi
= , Were more problematic. Stalin
incom, isingly i ; i
promisingly intended to retain the Eastern Polish
eer he had seized in 1939, compensating Poland by
ransferring 3
aoa i her formerly German lands east of the
ee cisse line, and to control Poland through the
oviet-dominated puppet Lublin
installed in January 1945. Moreov
sition to Russian dominance, he
government which he
er, brooking no oppo-
. attempted to eliminate
otential a i-' vi
Pp tial anti-Soviet leaders. As early as 1939 Russian
oe ee many thousands of captured Polish
a ‘ yn and elsewhere. When Polish 1
ig hters launched an autumn 1944 We
assuming that approaching Sovie:
assist them, Stalin allow
Polish opposition befo:
mop up the surviving Ge
stance
saw uprising,
t forces would quickly
ed the Germans to destroy the
re deploying Russian troops to
Rebruary 1045 Sea ermans. At the Yalta conference of
alin effectively won British and American
acquiescence in his
made : dee control of Eastern Europe, but he
Poland and oth hold ‘free and unfettered elections’ in
Cr states. Within two weeks the Soviets
imposed a 5
be ul
ernment upon Rumania,
4 subservient goy,
evidence of how Jit, Gov:
os ow iSh
little Weight their pledges carried,
although until 1948 Stalin c
governments with substanti
in Czechoslovakia and Hun,
The Allies had jj
I rea
Saal d little real
‘ontinued to tolerate elected
‘al non-Communist elements
gary.” wh
leverage over Soviet behaviour
sidered vital to Soviet sec se whose control Stalin con-
compromise. There j Ccurity and therefore would not
1S some reason to suppose that Stalin
mn E
Europe, an ar
6
THE EUROPEAN DIMENSION, 1945-1950
ae
believed that he and his Western allies, effectively dividing
Europe into spheres of influence, had left defeated Italy
and liberated France under Anglo-American dominance,
free from Soviet interference. In early 1945, moreover,
Roosevelt eagerly sought Soviet support for the United
Nations and Soviet entry into the continuing war against
Japan which, until atomic bombs were successfully tested
in July 1945, was expected to last at least until 1946.
To avoid precipitating inter-allied tensions, throughout
the war, even as late as the last summit conferences, the
final settlement of many issues, including the postwar
government of Germany, was deferred until a later date.
Since 1940, however, the Western allics had committed
themselves in principle to the self-determination of
peoples, views which informed the United Nations
Organization whose creation the Big Three wartime allies
endorsed at the spring 1945 San Francisco conference. By
early 1945 wartime propaganda emphasizing the supposed
commitment of the Big Three powers to identical war
aims and ideals was wearing thin, and the defeat of
Germany eliminated the once overriding concern to
paper over all such divisions to facilitate the battle against
a common enemy. Ideological and stylistic differences
among the former allies, as well as their divergent war
aims, assumed new significance.
It soon became apparent that Soviet and Western
interests in Europe would not be easily reconciled.
Stalin’s pronouncedly paranoid and suspicious person-
ality may have been largely responsible, as Gaddis has
suggested in We Now Know (1997). It virtually precludedTHE COLD W
rr
him from trusting or reaching lasting agreements with
either his allies or the Soviet satellites in Eastern Europe,
wince made the Cold War close to inevitable. Yet while
Stalin’s temperamental peculiarities undoubtedly
exacerbated the inability of the former allies to negotiate
the cc ses! Tel . ‘
ae necessary to solid agreements during
he Cold War, dey a gana M
freee iepia, developing strains and tensions among
m also reflected very real divi
ae ; ions and dramatically
erent prioriti ili i
ts ' priorities. The prevailing power vacuum in
ope exacerbated Soviet-Western frictions,
absence of real
as did the
Biceles communication or understanding
: s and Westerner:
Americans enjoyed a wide
contacts with e
Suropeans and
ange of official and personal
“ae eae, other, running the gamut from
educadénat. 1 Ships and intermarriages, through shared
at, Dusiness, and governmental ties. Whatever
} could readily Mipedeen a prevecupations, priorities
i and ways of doing busines:
\ Communism Soy
their disagreeme
“Ss,
preoccupations, prioriti
I of their counterparts. Under
viet officials were precluded from
numbers; i ot a
banishment, even death might well bring disgrace,
pounded this mutual iGo;
developing
8 in Wi ite
their Western opposite
Ideological hostility com-
prehension, facilitating rapid
Postwar deterioration {
f terioration in Soviet-Western fdladion
| As war ended j
ed in Europe. @
in ruins. France. he a ope, German and Italian power lay
| G : ©, defeated in 1940 and partic ied by
t sermany until late id partially occupied YY
' | resources to cata ‘ lacked the economic and moral
ace the ie
them. Britain, one of the Big Three
1950
: EUROPEAN DIMENSION, 194
——
allied powers, emerged from the war victorious but
effectively dependent upon the United States
economically, and, with the abrupt end of Lend-Lease,
desperately seeking a substantial loan to facilitate recovery.
an aid, war costs forced Britain to liquidate
as investments and foreign exchange
holdings and incur huge new debts, making any major
Despite Ameri
most of its overs
independent overseas role impossible. Though
technologically backward, the Soviet army was by far the
largest military force in Europe, an intimidating colossus
even after its numbers fell from 11.9 million in 1945 to
somewhere between 2.9 million and 4 million three years
an a i
n authoritarian Slate ri
ee publicly characteri
ar economic pl
an as ne
ith the capi
an administration request™
oC Se : Crate:
unsellor in the United States
16
1950
THE EUROF N DIM
embassy in Moscow and a Soviet expert, to explain the
s. In perhaps the seminal
rationale behind Russian polici
document of the Cold War, Kennan replied with an
8,000-vord tele ated that, since Soviet antag-
onism towards the West arose from the need of Russian
rulers to justify their oppre:
to combat the hostility of foreign powe
could do little to alter Soviet policies. Ir
adopt policies of ‘containment, firmly resisting attempts
to expand Soviet influence while awaiting internal
changes which would alter the nature of Soviet
ighout
‘am. Its
sive domestic rule as essential
rs, Western states
stead, they must
government. Kennan’s telegram, circulated throu
the higher echelons of American government, and his
subsequent article ‘The Sources of Soviet Conduct’,
published in the influential quarterly Foreign Affairs,
quickly became definitive documents of United States
Cold War strategy. Kennan returned to Washington to
head the newly created Policy Planning Staff, charged
with the long-range planning and conceptualization of
United States foreign policy. Until the early 1990s the
word ‘containment’ would fundamentally describe
American policies toward the Soviet Union.
British and European leaders had good reasons to
encourage American involvement indeed, the historian
Geir Lundestad has characterized United States domin-
ance of Western Europe as an ‘em
Aware that even united they could not match Soviet
1 that internal economic
pire by invitation’.
military strength, and fearfu
nations €
prey to both
on and external threat,
weakness might make their
internal Communist subve
17TH
COLD WAR
Western leaders actively
» United
sought to persuade the Unite
States to assume f
far greater European responsibilities than
ever before. The British, until the Second World War ae
the world’s greatest Power, took the lead in this effort.
Britain, no longer a su
Pp atched by
erpower, and now outmatched b}
both the Unit
€d States and the Soviet Union, while
its great power status, was 100
merican support and acquies
© Cold War gene acted as a
United States, while continuing ©
as defence and
his enabled Britain to ‘punch above
national scene, but the emphasis on
Britain's world role may also have
: Sher West
Homy to lag behind those of other V
les,
cence; and throughout th
loyal lieutenant to the
shoulder disproportio
other commitments, ‘T]
Us weight’ on the intery
nately large ove
and
European countri
In the crucial early Cold War years British officials
eyparts
exhorted their American counterP it
a: ve — mit
new economic and military cor st
fo:
* and then to enlarge them. Most
Sen fe (OL
arch 1946 the towering figure er
» the egendary Bi, ah
“the
ish wartime prime min
» had all the prestige of n,
man’, spoke out at ee
‘iron curtain’, he aid, had descended
With freedom on on 0
" British and Americans must unite i
er extension, Stalin and some America”
Churchill’s speech, which was clear
vance Wi
: : an
1th the Truman administration
English
aa
fe oe aspotis™
€ side, totalitarian desp
18
/Y
:, 1945-1950
THE EUROP N DIMENSION, 1945 195
a
endorsed by the new British Labour government. Other
European pleas soon followed. scidle dnformedithe
In February 1947 British officia s cereuliearane’
American government that economis a aid TURE
vented them continuing their aid to Cre ae ait
countries bordering the strategically 1946/47 Europe
routes for Middle Eastern oil. In 1946,
2 sing
. r many years, closir
5 red its hardest winter for many y ae
suffered its har hortages,
ing severe food and fuel s
factories and generating severe mo «eel aleoufetedieen
rising inflation, and social unrest. Eu r iB ing $5 billion.
annual balance of payments deficit sur pa S ealectcl
s e strikes in France and the growing wo ndttiog
an * “ iz 0 UNIS! a
Strength of both French and Italian = aE : murs
lsiecs najor Wes
‘ ibility that two maj ae
‘aised the ibility ‘st camp, shifting
id move into the Communist camp: see
would vi - . caselyiin 9
the European balance of forces an a sneseatel
. k the lea DE
c ow re vernment took a
favour. The British govern anentin(all these eventfd
nations
sively seeking American a:
problems.
: nly public
reside: fruman not on e
In March President Tru amme for Greece and
context of an American
ey ail —
ported an extensive aid prog)
oi is in the a
Turkey, but presented this ry where democracy was
y » democracy was
i . The effectively
commitment to <
threatened either e ee
: ned oi
unlimited global pledge of U = George ©. Maranall to
Stary of sta 8! aaa
the way for secretary ¢ te © a erainmerforrt
announce a major economic Sie ee ae satellites
European nations, The Soviet Union a i eee
M ea a Se oe an, Tus y
7 Recovery I
Ae ee ist nations
soon boycotted the : 7 saeeral
u d the Marshall Plan, while non-Comn
erme “J jarsna
19THE COLD WAR
participated in a coordinated four
enhance
European
year enterprise to
their economic perform
Gconomies once more
Historians have deb
ance and make the
self-sustaining.
ated the precise impact of
American aid, with some suggesting that it had litle
impact on already improv
others arguing that it 1
between success and sta
doubt, however,
i jes and
Ing European economies, an
a SPR m eh
made the crucial det
3 = ele
Snation. There can be litt
ig one
that the Plan made a substantial c¢
iain E verall
tribution. Its final Feport, in 1952, noted that ove i
I : P . increased by
West European industrial Production had increased b}
64 per ce
nt since 1947
levels; from 1947
cement Productio
cent, 31 per cent,
re rewar
and 41 per cent over prev ‘I
5 we oy, an
0 1959 coal, aluminium, copper .
a 59 pe
n levels grew by 27 per cent, 69 |
% european
+ and 90 per cent respectively. Europe fi
Populations were able to resume =
regain self-confidence,
continued European ¢
4 normal way of life an
The Plan also set a precedent for
operation, facilitating the cré :
ropean Coal and Steel Community:
s European Union, on
&t divided Western from Eastet
ensified the Cold War, Essential t ue
™m European recovery was German €C°
vival, at least in those sectors under American
British, and French occupation/ It seems that one me
to keep Germany weak, wna?!
N war or invade Rus res
concerns were incompatible, therefor’
and Soyi, ee European quest for economic rede
et-Western relations we, ee
an furth
Europe and in
Cessful Weste,
Ca third Europea
F Curity
with the We
again
re so poor as to I
20
5-1950
EUROP DIMENSION, 19
en
romise unattain-
any understanding or negotiated See eae ae
able, Two Russian historians, ve fhe Sovee
Constantine Pleshakov, even a eee of the Cold
the Marshall Plan marked the real ee ce tect
War They or Pie announced the
Europe. In October 1947 Bealin. alta enmeiness
ceepilnumen of the Cominform, a = a A
grouping of nine major Communist pe ta gael
d to sabotage the Marshall Plan, @ a
expected to sabotage ally electe
Communist coups overthrew demoer
governments in Hungary and Czec oe Src Guana
Most flamboyantly, in June 2 : ana eterh
reforms were introduced in the howe ec tinton
Occupation sectors of germane ie eA
responded by cutting off land, access £0 ert
the symbolically significant a oe ina tnres! Westen
Ba edie and the United States,
ae later merged into
solve; for eleven
‘s into
of the
in the Soviet se
occupying powers, et
= e! " ch W
had been assigned zones whic aa
‘i erica
one. Soviet obduracy met Am aiieaenta|Gunpl
months a massive airlift ferried all es terblockade
x 1 r nte
West Berlin, while a Western on damaging]De
se roved economically damagingd
Soviet zone proved ecc hich often character
powers avoided any
mon-
. 7 i Wl
strating the practical egunon Yh
Cold War crises, the Western ion with Soviet force
potential direct military confrontat ans Bywae aero
Z [ y or! ? "
b hewing attempts to resupply Be
Soviet-occupied territory. nuributed to the
oT sli kade co ae
The Berlin blockad - of German reunificat
decision to abandon hope ¢
Western
jon and
21establish a separate state, the Federal Republic of
Germany, in the former We:
its foundation in 1949, the
Europe were clearly
persuaded the U.
stern occupation sectors. with
territorial borders of Cold W a
delineated The first Berlin c ee
nited States to conclude a permanel
military alliance with most West European states, finally
Jettisoning the w
. . Loe its first
arnings of George Washington, its
President, against
Truman administr:
involvement in Eu
any such commitments. Initially, -
ation had sought to limit Americal
irope to economic aid, hoping “lor
ear the primary responsibility . nd
European continental defence, and in 1947 Britain an
France had Signed the Dunkirk
Pact, expanded the
Pact, which k
Luxembourg
Britain would b
salty, a mutual aed
following year to become the Sd
Prought Belgium, the Netherlands, be
under its umbrella, Ernest Bevin, the Brits
foreign Minister, “epeatedly urged the United States thats
i 5 Ran ae a
Without its Participation, such arrangements would fa!
reassure Western
European states that they were sea
against Russian attack, which in turn would undercut i
ents of the Marshall Plan. ‘The Berlit
such pleas added force, teen
nited States, Canada, and fourtee
+. Treaty:
€s concluded the North Atiantic a
an att ;
European countri
nder its ack on one signatory would the
ed an assault on all, including hat
States, a deterrent so effective # vas
‘0 be such an assault. West Germany
NATO member, although NATO (re
sure
assul
n German Soil, some suggested to
Nota founding
Were Stationed 9
22
45-1950
THE EUROPEAN DIMENSION, 1945
ee
iz re German
NATO allies of compliant futu acd
ervous } allies rape
behavi The wealth and sizeable pop si
behaviour. The wee pene
5 the German
ilitary a
Germany represented military
ed. a in 19
be permanently oct eee prompting the
ic joined the allia ee ea y Pact, a
Federal Republic jo a Warsaw Pact,
= viet Union in turn to establish the " gt ae
Soviet U ing of its East European s able
lary grouping s essentially stable,
similar m ; : ;
s mw
By 1950 the European al paling Wise
: laries demarca wa
vi varly defined bound ne Cold War,
Safes - of influence. Throughout tl
Soviet spheres
their i
- » primary
interests remained the pri
‘ ity
and associated security _
ive European alliances and ate viet and
espective Europ foci of both Sov
: both sides
rical flights on
i : icy. Rhetorical interests
United States policy. } espected the it
notwithstanding, in practice each respe
notwi Sta a
val, understanding that their opponent considered
i co}
hat their oppo:
nderstanding FE a
of i
the:
rity and would r
as vital to its own security an)
© areas
s. Successive
trongly to any encroachments. St ing in
strongly any . sing:
E, i: Europe — the Berlin ose nd 1968, and the
Easter z ar
Hungarian and Czech crises of 1956 seen in 1981 —
prea f the Polish Solidarity mo from the West.
repression o. ral support i
so in any but moral suf ituation was more
aile > win any bu 7 jtuation wa .
ne tos 1 the world, by contrast, a the Communist
Elsewhere ir oT for either 4 7
. — rtunities se of thé other.
roviding oppor + expense 0
Auid, pr Thu: lien to gain at the exp s of the Cold War
or ae nwards, therefore, the por vemionganore
a if 3 Europe towards es fphaes
shifted from 4 its original emphasis.
fundamentally peripheral to its orig
1953