IF12549
IF12549
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Hamas: Background, Current Status, and U.S. Policy
protect and transport personnel and weapons—significantly economic recovery and reconstruction was minimal—
increasing targeting difficulties for Israeli forces. perhaps partly because some international actors were
According to the State Department, “Hamas has received unsure about the durability of any rebuilding efforts and/or
funding, weapons, and training from Iran and raises funds how those efforts could proceed without bolstering Hamas.
in Persian Gulf countries,” and Iran provides up to $100 President Biden has surmised that one objective of Hamas’s
million annually in combined support to Palestinian October 7 assault may have been to disrupt Israel’s
militants. U.S. officials have said they have not found improvement of relations with Saudi Arabia. Hamas might
evidence that Iran helped directly plan the October 7 have sought to reemphasize the importance of Arab popular
attacks, but argue that Iran’s longtime support for Hamas support for the Palestinian cause to Arab states engaging in
makes it “broadly complicit.” An Economist article has or considering closer relations with Israel. Hamas leaders
estimated Hamas’s annual revenue to be more than $1 and various observers have suggested other possible
billion, with around $360 million in “taxes” on goods objectives for the attack, such as bolstering Hamas’s
brought into Gaza, and about $750 million from foreign domestic popularity amid active speculation over who
sources. According to the Treasury Department and a U.S.- might succeed PA President Abbas, securing prisoner
based expert, these sources include Iran’s government and releases, and capitalizing on Israeli domestic discord.
cryptocurrency exchanges, plus financiers, companies, and It is unclear how the October assault and Israel’s reaction to
charities in other regional countries, including Algeria, it may affect Hamas’s future in Gaza or elsewhere, and
Sudan, Qatar, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. whether it can realize its basic goals. Israeli Prime Minister
Political Ambition, Control of Gaza, and Popularity Benjamin Netanyahu has declared Israel’s intent to “destroy
Hamas apparently seeks to play a leading role in the the military and governmental capabilities of Hamas.”
Palestinian national movement. In 2006, it won a surprise Domestic and international pressures could influence the
victory over Fatah in PA legislative elections, giving it nature and extent of Israel’s military operations and post-
nominal control over several key PA government ministries conflict security plans in Gaza, and efforts to stifle support
as it vied with PA President Mahmoud Abbas (who also for Hamas or the ideas and practices it represents.
heads Fatah) for power. A Middle East “Quartet” (the U.S. Policy and Options for Congress
United States, European Union, Russia, and U.N. Secretary- Major questions for U.S. policymakers include: How can
General) urged Hamas to recognize Israel, renounce U.S. efforts to counter Hamas and the Iran-led “axis of
violence, and accept previous Israeli-Palestinian resistance” bolster Israel, the PA, and other U.S. regional
agreements. Hamas refused. After a Saudi-brokered PA partners while minimizing suffering for Palestinian
unity government collapsed in 2007, Hamas forcibly seized civilians? How should the United States engage with allies
Gaza, and has since presided over worsening economic and or partners—such as Qatar and Turkey—that may host or
humanitarian conditions there as the de facto authoritarian support Hamas and seek to mediate its conflicts? How can
ruler. Since taking power, Hamas and other groups like various actors assist Palestinians in Gaza and reestablish
Palestine Islamic Jihad (PIJ) have used Gaza to launch post-conflict governance there without empowering Hamas
attacks on Israel, prompting tightened access restrictions or its ideology and tactics? Since 2006, Congress and the
from Israel and Egypt. The PA has countered Hamas’s executive branch appear to have structured certain types of
presence in the West Bank with Israeli and U.S. support. U.S. economic and security assistance partly to help the PA
Media reports since 2022 suggest that Hamas and PIJ, with counter Hamas. Congress also has placed conditions and
Iranian backing, have aided increased militant action in the restrictions on U.S. funding to any PA government that
West Bank to target Israelis and undermine the PA. Hamas controls, joins, or “unduly influences” (for example,
The extent of Hamas’s domestic popularity is uncertain. in P.L. 109-446 and Section 7040(f) of P.L. 117-328).
Hamas portrays itself as defending Palestinian national The Biden Administration publicly supports Israel’s efforts
aspirations and Jerusalem’s Muslim holy sites, and is the to end Hamas rule in Gaza, while seeking greater protection
preferred faction of at least 20% of Palestinians (in the and humanitarian assistance for civilians. U.S. and Israeli
West Bank and Gaza, or WBG) in most polls. However, in officials also seek the release of hostages. Debate continues
an Arab Barometer survey just prior to October 7, a about how to achieve these goals. The Treasury Department
majority of Gazans expressed little or no trust in the has designated many actors for sanctions as Hamas
Hamas-led government, and Palestinians (in WBG) voiced supporters, but may have difficulty limiting fundraising
more overall support for Fatah than for Hamas. WBG polls activities abroad that bypass the U.S. financial system.
from late 2023 suggested that the conflict had boosted
Palestinian approval for Hamas, but one analyst said such In November 2023, the House passed the Hamas
views could change when conflict subsides. In the wake of International Financing Prevention Act (H.R. 340), which
past conflicts, Hamas’s domestic popularity has spiked, would require the executive branch to impose sanctions on
before falling again to pre-conflict levels soon thereafter. foreign actors that provide certain types of support to
Hamas, PIJ, or affiliates, subject to a presidential waiver for
Armed Conflict with Israel national security reasons. Some other bills (including S. 489
Hamas has pointed to purported Israeli military and and H.R. 5996) would condition funding to Gaza on
political provocations to justify escalations of violence. certifications that Hamas and other FTOs would not benefit.
During the four rounds of major conflict before October
2023, Hamas and other militants launched rockets Jim Zanotti, Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs
indiscriminately toward Israel, and Israeli military strikes
largely decimated Gaza’s infrastructure. After each round, IF12549
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Hamas: Background, Current Status, and U.S. Policy
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.