Quiz 6
Quiz 6
A. (Correct) They influence the choice of design parameters and coordinating mechanisms.
Answer: A. They influence the choice of design parameters and coordinating mechanisms.
Elaboration: Mintzberg argues that the age and size of an organization affect its internal design. Older an
d larger organizations tend to move towards more complex structures, often involving increased formaliza
tion and specialization. The choice of design parameters, such as the degree of formalization, and coordi
nating mechanisms, like direct supervision or standardization, is influenced by the organization’s age and
size.
================================================================================
===============================
Elaboration: As organizations age and grow in size, they tend to elaborate their administrative structures.
This involves the development of more complex and differentiated structures, including the establishment
of specialized roles, departments, and hierarchical levels to manage increased complexity.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.3. Which design parameter is influenced by the age and size of an organization?
Elaboration: The degree of formalization, referring to the extent to which rules and procedures are establi
shed, is influenced by the age and size of an organization. Larger and older organizations tend to have hi
gher levels of formalization to cope with increased complexity and coordinate activities.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.4. How does Mintzberg describe the relationship between age, size, and organizational structure?
C. (Correct) Age and size are associated with the degree of bureaucratization and elaboration.
Answer: C. Age and size are associated with the degree of bureaucratization and elaboration.
Elaboration: Mintzberg suggests that as organizations age and grow in size, they tend to become more bu
reaucratized and elaborate in their administrative structures. Bureaucratization involves the development
of formal rules and procedures, and elaboration refers to the increased complexity of administrative struct
ures.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.5. In the context of organizational development, what role does age play according to Mintzberg?
B. (Correct) Age is associated with the tendency to move from simple to more complex structures.
Answer: B. Age is associated with the tendency to move from simple to more complex structures.
Elaboration: According to Mintzberg, organizations typically start with simpler structures in their formative
years. As they age, they tend to develop more complex structures to adapt to the changing environment, i
ncreasing size, and the need for more sophisticated coordination mechanisms.
==============================================================================
Q6.6 In Mintzberg’s organizational design framework, which of the following characteristics is NOT typicall
y associated with a simple structure?
Elaboration: Simple structures are characterized by minimal bureaucracy and informality. Decision-makin
g is centralized in the hands of the owner or manager, and there are few formal rules or procedures.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.7. What is the primary reason why simple structures are often found in small businesses and startups
?
Answer: (e) They are well-suited for organizations in dynamic and uncertain environments.
Elaboration: Simple structures allow small businesses and startups to quickly adapt to changing market c
onditions and customer needs. The flexibility and informality of these structures enable rapid decision-ma
king and experimentation.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.8. Which of the following is NOT an example of an external control that can influence power relationsh
ips within an organization?
Elaboration: Customer preferences are not a form of external control. They can influence the organization’
s design and structure, but they do not directly impact power relationships within the organization.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.9. Which design parameter is influenced by the age and size of an organization?
Elaboration: The degree of formalization, referring to the extent to which rules and procedures are establi
shed, is influenced by the age and size of an organization. Larger and older organizations tend to have hi
gher levels of formalization to cope with increased complexity and coordinate activities.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.10.How does Mintzberg describe the relationship between age, size, and organizational structure?
C. (Correct) Age and size are associated with the degree of bureaucratization and elaboration.
Answer: C. Age and size are associated with the degree of bureaucratization and elaboration.
Elaboration: Mintzberg suggests that as organizations age and grow in size, they tend to become more bu
reaucratized and elaborate in their administrative structures. Bureaucratization involves the development
of formal rules and procedures, and elaboration refers to the increased complexity of administrative struct
ures.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.11.In the context of organizational development, what role does age play according to Mintzberg?
B. (Correct) Age is associated with the tendency to move from simple to more complex structures.
Answer: B. Age is associated with the tendency to move from simple to more complex structures.
Elaboration: According to Mintzberg, organizations typically start with simpler structures in their formative
years. As they age, they tend to develop more complex structures to adapt to the changing environment, i
ncreasing size, and the need for more sophisticated coordination mechanisms.
================================================================================
===============================
B. (Correct) They affect the need for coordination mechanisms and structural components.
Answer: B. They affect the need for coordination mechanisms and structural components.
Elaboration: Mintzberg emphasizes that environmental dimensions, such as stability and complexity, shap
e the organizational need for coordination mechanisms (e.g., standardization) and structural components
(e.g., differentiation). Different environmental dimensions require different structural responses for effectiv
e functioning.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.13. What role do environmental dimensions play in the design of organizational structure?
B. (Correct) They contribute to the choice between organic and mechanistic structures.
Answer: B. They contribute to the choice between organic and mechanistic structures.
Elaboration: Environmental dimensions influence the choice between organic and mechanistic structures.
For instance, a stable environment may favor mechanistic structures, while a dynamic environment may p
ush organizations towards more organic structures to adapt quickly.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.14. Which of the following is NOT an example of how environmental dimensions can influence organiz
ational design?
(a) A grocery store in a stable and predictable environment may adopt a simple structure.
(b) A technology company in a dynamic and hostile environment may adopt a complex and adaptive struc
ture.
(c) A hospital in a complex and diverse environment may adopt a decentralized structure with specialized
departments.
(d) A government agency in a stable and predictable environment may adopt a bureaucratic structure.
(e) A non-profit organization in a diverse and hostile environment may adopt a flexible and collaborative st
ructure.
Answer: (c) A hospital in a complex and diverse environment may adopt a centralized structure with speci
alized departments.
Elaboration: Hospitals are typically complex organizations that operate in a diverse and dynamic environ
ment. This requires them to adopt a decentralized structure with specialized departments, which allows th
em to respond quickly and effectively to changing needs. A centralized structure would be too rigid and inf
lexible for a hospital to operate effectively in this environment.
Overall, Mintzberg’s environmental dimensions are a useful framework for understanding how the externa
l environment can influence organizational design. By carefully considering these dimensions, organizatio
ns can choose a structure that best suits their needs and helps them to achieve their goals.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.15. How does Mintzberg describe the relationship between environmental dimensions and organizatio
nal structure?
C. (Correct) Environmental dimensions influence the need for coordination mechanisms and structural co
mponents.
Answer: C. Environmental dimensions influence the need for coordination mechanisms and structural co
mponents.
Elaboration: Mintzberg argues that environmental dimensions shape the organizational need for coordinat
ion mechanisms (e.g., standardization) and structural components (e.g., specialization). The nature of the
environment determines the most effective way to coordinate work within the organization.
================================================================================
===============================
(a) Stability
(b) Complexity
(c) Diversity
(d) Hostility
(e) Dynamism
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.17. Which of the following is NOT an example of an organization that typically adopts a simple structur
e?
Elaboration: Multinational corporations typically employ complex organizational structures due to their larg
e size, global reach, and diversified operations. Simple structures are generally not suitable for such large
and complex organizations.s
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.18.Which of the following member needs is most likely to lead to a decentralized organizational struct
ure?
Elaboration: Employees with a high need for autonomy and self-direction are likely to prefer a decentraliz
ed structure that gives them more freedom and control over their work.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.19. Which of the following cultural influences is most likely to lead to a formal organizational structure?
Elaboration: Cultures that value respect for authority and tradition are more likely to adopt formal organiza
tional structures with clear hierarchies and well-defined roles and responsibilities.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.20. How does cultural influence impact power relationships in organizational structure according to Mi
ntzberg?
C. (Correct) Cultural influences shape the values and norms that impact the distribution of authority.
E. The organization’s product offerings are the primary determinant of cultural influence.
Answer: C. Cultural influences shape the values and norms that impact the distribution of authority.
Elaboration: Mintzberg asserts that cultural influences play a crucial role in shaping the values and norms
within an organization. These cultural elements, in turn, impact how authority is distributed among membe
rs, influencing power relationships.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.21. Which of the following power relationships is most likely to lead to conflict within an organization?
Elaboration: Coercive power, which relies on threats or punishment, is more likely to lead to conflict and r
esentment than other forms of power. Employees who are subjected to coercive power may feel disempo
wered and disengaged, which can negatively impact productivity and morale.
================================================================================
===============================
A. Simple Structure is characterized by a highly elaborate technostructure and complex support staff.
B. (Correct) Simple Structure features little or no technostructure, few support staffers, and a loose divisio
n of labor.
D. Simple Structure is synonymous with rigid and highly formalized communication channels.
Answer: B. Simple Structure features little or no technostructure, few support staffers, and a loose division
of labor.
Elaboration: Mintzberg’s Simple Structure is defined by its simplicity, marked by minimal technostructure,
a sparse support staff, and a loose division of labor. This configuration emphasizes flexibility and direct co
mmunication channels.
================================================================================
===============================
B. (Correct) Simple Structure features flexible decision-making, with power centralized at the strategic ap
ex.
E. The middle line in Simple Structure plays a dominant role in decision-making processes.
Answer: B. Simple Structure features flexible decision-making, with power centralized at the strategic ape
x.
Elaboration: In Simple Structure, decision-making is characterized by its flexibility, with power concentrate
d at the strategic apex. This allows for rapid response and adaptability to changing circumstances.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.24. Under what conditions does Simple Structure thrive according to Mintzberg?
B. (Correct) Simple Structure is well-suited for simple and dynamic environments, especially in young and
small organizations.
D. Large organizations with a complex technical system are ideal for Simple Structure.
Answer: B. Simple Structure is well-suited for simple and dynamic environments, especially in young and
small organizations.
Elaboration: Mintzberg suggests that Simple Structure is most effective in simple, dynamic environments,
making it suitable for young and small organizations that prioritize flexibility over bureaucracy.
================================================================================
===============================
B. (Correct) Simple Structure is considered the riskiest of configurations, hinging on the health and whims
of one individual.
Answer: B. Simple Structure is considered the riskiest of configurations, hinging on the health and whims
of one individual.
Elaboration: The risk associated with Simple Structure lies in its dependence on a single individual, typical
ly the CEO. Any health-related issues or unpredictable decisions by this individual can have a significant i
mpact on the organization.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.26.How does Mintzberg describe the organizational culture within Simple Structure?
C. (Correct) Simple Structure provides a strong sense of mission, with employees developing solid identifi
cation with the leader’s vision.
D. Organizational culture in Simple Structure is characterized by extensive formal procedures and protoco
ls.
E. Simple Structure encourages a culture where power is distributed across all organizational levels.
Answer: C. Simple Structure provides a strong sense of mission, with employees developing solid identific
ation with the leader’s vision.
Elaboration: Mintzberg notes that Simple Structure often fosters a strong sense of mission, where employ
ees identify with the leader’s vision. This can lead to rapid organizational growth and a sense of purpose
among members.
================================================================================
===============================
B. (Correct) Autocratic Organization is marked by a concentration of power at the top, with the chief execu
tive hoarding decision-making authority.
Answer: B. Autocratic Organization is marked by a concentration of power at the top, with the chief execut
ive hoarding decision-making authority.
Elaboration: In an Autocratic Organization, power is concentrated at the top, typically with the chief execut
ive making decisions unilaterally. This style is characterized by a lack of shared decision-making.
================================================================================
===============================
B. (Correct) Leadership in Autocratic Organization tends to be autocratic, with the chief executive hoardin
g power and avoiding formalization of behavior.
Answer: B. Leadership in Autocratic Organization tends to be autocratic, with the chief executive hoarding
power and avoiding formalization of behavior.
Elaboration: Autocratic Organization is characterized by a leadership style where the chief executive tend
s to hoard power and avoids formalizing organizational behavior. Decision-making is often centralized.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.29. What factor can lead to the development of an Autocratic Organization according to Mintzberg?
C. (Correct) Personal needs for power, where the chief executive hoards decision-making authority, can l
ead to the development of an Autocratic Organization.
Answer: C. Personal needs for power, where the chief executive hoards decision-making authority, can le
ad to the development of an Autocratic Organization.
Elaboration: Mintzberg suggests that an Autocratic Organization can develop when the chief executive ha
s personal needs for power and avoids formalization of behavior, leading to a concentration of decision-m
aking authority.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.30. How does Mintzberg describe the decision-making process in Autocratic Organizations?
E. The middle line in Autocratic Organizations plays a dominant role in decision-making processes.
Elaboration: In Autocratic Organizations, decision-making is centralized, with a single person, often the ch
ief executive, making decisions without extensive consultation. This aligns with the autocratic leadership s
tyle.
================================================================================
===============================
D. (Correct) Autocratic Organizations may be associated with cultures where the chief executive’s power i
s not challenged, and decision-making is driven by the leader’s preferences.
Answer: D. Autocratic Organizations may be associated with cultures where the chief executive’s power is
not challenged, and decision-making is driven by the leader’s preferences.
Elaboration: In Autocratic Organizations, cultures may develop where the chief executive’s power is not c
hallenged, and decision-making aligns with the leader’s preferences. This can lead to a culture of obedien
ce and centralized control.
================================================================================
===============================
B. (Correct) Crisis Organization appears when extreme hostility forces an organization to centralize decisi
on-making temporarily.
Answer: B. Crisis Organization appears when extreme hostility forces an organization to centralize decisio
n-making temporarily.
Elaboration: A Crisis Organization is marked by its response to extreme hostility, which leads to a tempor
ary centralization of decision-making. In times of crisis, organizations may need a quick and coordinated r
esponse, necessitating concentrated authority.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.32. When might a Crisis Organization variant, such as a synthetic organization, be established accordi
ng to Mintzberg?
B. (Correct) Synthetic organizations are set up to deal with natural disasters, responding to new situations
in extremely hostile environments.
E. The synthetic organization model is preferred in large organizations with a hierarchical structure.
Answer: B. Synthetic organizations are set up to deal with natural disasters, responding to new situations
in extremely hostile environments.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.33. What impact does a crisis have on the structure of an organization according to Mintzberg?
B. (Correct) Crisis often results in centralization, focusing power in the hands of the chief executive for a c
oordinated response.
Elaboration: During a crisis, organizations often centralize decision-making to ensure a swift and coordina
ted response. The concentration of power in the hands of the chief executive is a common characteristic d
uring such periods of extreme hostility.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.34. Which factor distinguishes Crisis Organizations from other structures according to Mintzberg?
Elaboration: The distinguishing feature of Crisis Organizations is their temporary centralization of decision
-making during periods of extreme hostility. This allows for a focused and rapid response to the crisis at h
and.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.35. What type of environment is conducive to the establishment of a Crisis Organization according to
Mintzberg?
D. (Correct) Crisis Organizations are established in environments that are both extremely hostile and unpr
edictable.
Answer: D. Crisis Organizations are established in environments that are both extremely hostile and unpr
edictable.
Elaboration: A Crisis Organization is more likely to be established in environments that are not only extre
mely hostile but also unpredictable. The need for a quick and centralized response is crucial in such unce
rtain situations.
================================================================================
===============================
D. (Correct) Charismatic Organizations are led by a charismatic leader who gains power because follower
s lavish it upon them.
Answer: D. Charismatic Organizations are led by a charismatic leader who gains power because follower
s lavish it upon them.
Elaboration: In a Charismatic Organization, the key characteristic is the dominant influence of a charismat
ic leader. This leader gains power not by hoarding it but by virtue of the followers’ admiration and trust, cr
eating an organization centered around their personality.
================================================================================
===============================
C. (Correct) Charismatic Organizations tend to emerge when a leader’s charisma is a significant factor, re
gardless of the environment.
Answer: C. Charismatic Organizations tend to emerge when a leader’s charisma is a significant factor, re
gardless of the environment.
Elaboration: The emergence of a Charismatic Organization is not necessarily tied to a specific environme
nt. Instead, it is associated with the presence of a leader whose charisma plays a crucial role, regardless
of the organizational context.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.38. What distinguishes a Charismatic Organization’s power structure from other organizational structu
res according to Mintzberg?
B. (Correct) Charismatic Organizations have a power structure where the leader gains authority because
of followers’ admiration, rather than hoarding it or relying on bureaucratic processes.
Answer: B. Charismatic Organizations have a power structure where the leader gains authority because o
f followers’ admiration, rather than hoarding it or relying on bureaucratic processes.
Elaboration: The key distinction in a Charismatic Organization is the source of power, which is derived fro
m the leader’s charisma and the admiration of followers. Unlike hoarding power or relying on bureaucratic
structures, authority is gained through personal influence.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.39. How does Mintzberg describe the leadership style within a Charismatic Organization?
B. (Correct) Charismatic Organizations have leaders with a charismatic style, attracting followers through
personal qualities rather than formal structures.
D. Charismatic Organizations employ leaders who hoard power and avoid personal connections.
E. Charismatic Organizations have leaders who rely on routine and stable leadership approaches.
Answer: B. Charismatic Organizations have leaders with a charismatic style, attracting followers through p
ersonal qualities rather than formal structures.
Elaboration: The leadership style within a Charismatic Organization is charismatic, where leaders attract f
ollowers through personal qualities, vision, and charisma rather than formalized structures.
================================================================================
===============================
Q6.40. What role does culture play in Charismatic Organizations according to Mintzberg?
A. Charismatic Organizations are characterized by a culture that emphasizes bureaucracy and formalizati
on.
C. (Correct) Charismatic Organizations often have a culture that plays a prominent role, particularly in les
s industrialized societies where strong leaders coordinate through direct supervision.
D. Charismatic Organizations have a culture that avoids any form of power concentration.
Answer: C. Charismatic Organizations often have a culture that plays a prominent role, particularly in less
industrialized societies where strong leaders coordinate through direct supervision.
Elaboration: Culture in Charismatic Organizations is often significant, especially in less industrialized soci
eties. Strong leaders coordinate through direct supervision and personal influence, contributing to a cultur
e where charisma plays a prominent role in organizational dynamics.