Mukherjee REVISITINGGOODGOVERNANCE 2010
Mukherjee REVISITINGGOODGOVERNANCE 2010
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Indian Journal of
Political Science
Jhumpa Mukherjee
The present paper tries to delineate the fundamental principles of good governance and
endeavours to re-locate some aspects of Mahabharata, Arthashastra and Manusmriti by
way of finding the elements of good governance in these treatises.
Introduction
Since the inception of the State, the task of the government has been to govern, to cater
to the needs of the society. Such was the crucial role of government that almost 2500 years
ago Aristotle classified different types of government on the criterion of 'number' and 'purpose'.
Whilst today government is integral to each and every country, 'government" has shifted to
'governance' since the wake of globalization. The dawn of globalization, it is said has brought
about notion of 'good governance' and has imposed upon the governments that their task is
not simply to govern but govern effectively and efficiently, in a manner receptive to the needs
of the citizenry.
The motivation behind the paper is to analyse the different administrative mechanisms in
vogue in yester years as reflected in the ancient Hindu scriptures, texts and how far they are in
contrivance with the modem notion of welfare statism. Do these scriptures provide models of
good governance? We may begin with an attempt to analyse the different conceptions related to
good governance as is found in the Vedas, Mahabharata, Arthashatra and the Manusmriti.
The Mahabharata, although emphasizing upon normal and emergency functions of the
king, indicating totalitarian powers, yet assigns importance to a coterie of advisers to help the
king in his day to day activities, well reflective of the modem cabinet system. In an age when
birth, caste dominated occupations and service, the Shantiparva directs the king to appoint
people of caliber, integrity, reason, compassion, efficiency, reliability, justice and knowledge
as his counsels.
A careful study of the Shantiparva revealed that the king was powerful but not omnipotent.
The Mahabharata explicitly sanctions revolt against a king who is oppressive or fails in his
function of protection, saying that such a ruler is no king at all, and should be killed like a mad
dog. Is it not interesting that as early as third century B.C. the question of political obligation
finds predominance in an age of absolute monarchy? In the vein of contemporary theorists,
T.H.Green, Harold Laski, Mahabharata gives the citizens the right to resist unjust laws and
remove a ruler if he acts contrary to the welfare of the subjects. Nowhere in the different
theories of political obligation do we find mention of such an ancient theory so contemporary in
orientation.
His emphasis on welfare state is well reflected in his Saptanga theory, diplomacy, dandaniti.
Kautilya lived and wrote at a time India was divided in to a number of principalities, Kautilya was
the first to emphasize the need for a strong political centre in India. To him state consists of seven
key elements- Swami, Amatya, Janapada, Durga, Kosa, Danda, Mitra and each of these elements
had a significant role in statecraft since they are correlated and loss of one means loss to another.
Aware of calamities/prakiities that may afflict a State, Arthashastra has a solution to disaster
management too, a component of modem governance. He was of the view that out of the seven
of administration. Can it be conveniently said that modern norms of welfare stateism in India
reflected in our Directive Principles of State Policy are not borrowed from the west but very mu
indigenous and formed the ethos of ancient political system.
Manu places emphasis on decentralization, autonomy for the village and district
authorities and welfare activities. Interestingly, Manusmriti also speaks of the importance
the contemporary notion of public opinion. In the absence of the audio-visual and print media
in those days, for organization of public opinion, Manu contemplates an assembly of the learne
as well as the officers of the state. In the assembly they are expected to decide issues on t
basis of dharma. The prevalence of the notion of rule of law also finds place in the Manusmiti
where it is directed that the king is subject to law which is framed by the learned, not by the kin
himself, and anyone who defies this law deserves to be punished-thus the king was no
above or beyond law but circumscribed by law. Notion of political obligation also is stress
where it is observed that obedience to the king is necessary but it is conditional on the king's
performance of these functions.14
Conclusion
It has been argued that "some rigorous analytical attempts and in-depth study would
indicate that writers, philosophers, thinkers, poets, historians, rishis and others in ancient
India had delved into minute and logical examination of the issues related to the overall
development and growth of individual, society and state."15
The purpose of this work is not to argue that ancient Hindu political thought possess
emphatic solutions to all the present day evils afflicting governance, yet it can be stated forthwith
that serious studies of ancient Indian literature from a social science viewpoint would definitely
References :
1. Brown, D.M., Indian Political Thought: From Manu to Gandhi, Jaico Publishing House, 1964, pp. 15-16.
2. Sharma, S.K., Good Governance in Ancient India: Remembering Kingship in Shantiparva of Mahabharata,
Meerut Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, Vol. VI, No. 1, Jan-June 2003, p. 11 5.
3. Ibid, p. 119.
4. Mahabharat, Vth Part Shantiparvan, Geeta Press, Gorakhpur, Reprint 2001, 60. 19.
6. Sharan, P., Ancient Indian Political Thought and Institutions, Meenakshi Prakhashan, Meerut, 1978, p. 1
8. Varma, V.P., Studies in Hindu Political Thought and its Metaphysical Foundations, Motilal Banarsid
Delhi, p. 86.
9. Brown, D.M., Indian Political Thought: From Manu to Gandhi, Jaico Publishing House, 1964 , p. 59.
10. Mehta, V.R., Foundations of Indian Political Thought, Manohar Publishers, New Delhi, 1996, p. 36.
12. Varma, V.P., Studies in Hindu Political Thought and its Metaphysical Foundations, Motilal Banarsidass,
Delhi, p. 105.
15. Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar, Ancient Indian Democracy - Studies, Research and Some Modem Myths,
Indian Journal of Politics, Aligarh, Vol. XXXIX, No. 3, July-Sept. 2005, pp. 160-161