Mgt657 Chap1-5
Mgt657 Chap1-5
Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
13th Edition
Fred David
Strategy formulation
Strategy implementation
Strategy evaluation
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Ch 1 -6
Publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Ch 1 -7
Publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Ch 1 -8
Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Formulation
Long-Term Objectives
Alternative Strategies
Strategy Selection
Businesses to enter
Businesses to abandon
Allocation of resources
Expansion or
diversification
International markets
Mergers or joint
ventures
Avoidance of hostile
takeover
Annual Objectives
Policies
Employee Motivation
Resource Allocation
Mobilization of
employees & managers
Interpersonal skills
critical
Internal Review
External Review
Performance Measurement
Corrective Action
Judgment
Feelings
Little precedent
Competitive advantage
Strategists
Vision and mission statements
External opportunities and threats
Internal strengths and weaknesses
Long-term objectives
Strategies
Annual objectives
Policies
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Ch 1 -21
Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategic Management is
Gaining and Maintaining
Competitive Advantage
Gather Information
Analyze Information
Organize Information
Vision Statement –
What do we want to become?
Mission Statement –
What is our business?
Analysis of Trends
Economic
Social
Cultural
Demographic/Environmental
Political, Legal, Governmental
Technological
Competitors
Take advantage of
External Opportunities
Strategy Formulation
Avoid/minimize impact of
External Threats
Controllable
activities performed
especially well or poorly
Management
Marketing
Finance/Accounting
Production/Operations
Ratios
Performance Measures
Internal Factors
Industry Averages
Survey Data
Aid in evaluation
Create synergy
Reveal priorities
Focus coordination
Diversification
Acquisition
Product development
Market penetration
Retrenchment
Divestiture
Liquidation
Joint venture
Best Buy
Levi Strauss
StrategicManagement Process
Dynamic & continuous
Nonfinancial Benefits
Enhanced awareness of threats
Improved understanding of competitors’ strategies
Increased employee productivity
Reduced resistance to change
Clearer understanding of performance-reward
relationship
Enhanced problem-prevention capabilities
Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
13th Edition
Fred David
Clear Business
Vision
Comprehensive
Mission Statement
◼ Creed statement
◼ Statement of purpose
◼ Statement of philosophy
◼ Statement of beliefs
◼ Statement of business principles
◼ A statement “defining our business”
◼ Consolidate values
✓Dynamic in nature
Mission Technology
Employees Components
Survival,
Growth,
Public Profits
Image
Self-Concept Philosophy
◼ 6) Philosophy - What are the basic beliefs, values, aspirations, and ethical
priorities of the firm?
◼ 8) Concern for Public Image - Is the firm responsive to social, community, and
environmental concerns?
Chapter 3
Source: Fred R. David, “How Companies Define Their Mission,” Long Range Planning 22, no. 1 (February 1989): 91.
See also Anik Ratnaningsih, Nadjadji Anwar, Patdono Suwignjo, and Putu Artama Wiguna, “Balance Scorecard of
David’s Strategic Modeling at Industrial Business for National Construction Contractor of Indonesia,” Journal of
Mathematics and Technology, no. 4 (October 2010): 20.
Chapter outline : Focus of the chapter
7-11
Economic Forces
❖GDP
❖Unemployment rates
Ch 3 -12
Key Social, Cultural, Demographic, and
Natural Environmental Variables
❖ Population changes by race, ❖ Attitudes toward retirement
age, and geographic area ❖ Energy conservation
❖ Regional changes in tastes and ❖ Attitudes toward product
preferences quality
❖ Number of marriages ❖ Attitudes toward customer
❖ Number of divorces service
❖ Number of births ❖ Pollution control
❖ Number of deaths ❖ Attitudes toward foreign
❖ Immigration and emigration peoples
rates ❖ Energy conservation
❖ Social Security programs ❖ Social programs
❖ Life expectancy rates ❖ Number of churches
❖ Per capita income ❖ Number of church members
❖ Social media pervasiveness ❖ Social responsibility issues
7-13
Social, Cultural, Demographic, and
Natural Environmental Forces
Major Impact –
•Products
•Services
•Markets
•Customers
Ch 3 -14
Political, Governmental, and
Legal Forces
❖The increasing global interdependence
among economies, markets, governments,
and organizations makes it imperative that
firms consider the possible impact of
political variables on the formulation and
implementation of competitive strategies.
7-16
Political, Governmental, and
Legal Forces
Government Regulation
◼ Lobbying activities
◼ Patent laws
Ch 3 -17
Political, Governmental, and Legal Forces
❖Protectionist policies
Ch 3 -18
Technological Forces
New technologies such as:
❖ the Internet of Things
❖ 3D printing
❖ the cloud
❖ mobile devices
❖ biotech
❖ analytics
❖ autotech
❖ robotics and
❖ artificial intelligence
are fueling innovation in many industries, and impacting
strategic-planning decisions.
7-19
Technological Forces
❖Many firms now have a Chief Information
Officer (CIO) and a Chief Technology
Officer (CTO) who work together to
ensure that information needed to
formulate, implement, and evaluate
strategies is available where and when it is
needed
7-20
Results of Technological Advances
1. Major opportunities and threats that must be considered in formulating
strategies.
2. Can affect organizations’ products, services, markets, suppliers,
distributors, competitors, customers, manufacturing processes,
marketing practices, and competitive position.
3. Can create new markets, result in new and improved products, change
the relative competitive cost positions, and render existing products and
services obsolete.
4. Can reduce or eliminate cost barriers between businesses, create shorter
production runs, create shortages in technical skills, and result in
changing values and expectations of employees, managers, and
customers.
5. Can create new competitive advantages that are more powerful than
existing advantages.
7-21
Technological Forces
Major Impact –
•Internet
•Essential for nearly every
strategic decision
Ch 3 -22
Competitive Forces
❖An important part of an external audit is
identifying rival firms and determining their
strengths, weaknesses, capabilities,
opportunities, threats, objectives, and
strategies
7-24
Key Questions About Competitors
1. What are the strengths of our major competitors?
2. What are the weaknesses of our major competitors?
3. What are the objectives and strategies of our major competitors?
4. How will our major competitors most likely respond to current economic, social,
cultural, demographic, environmental, political, governmental, legal, technological,
and competitive trends affecting our industry?
5. How vulnerable are the major competitors to our alternative company strategies?
6. How vulnerable are our alternative strategies to successful counterattack by our
major competitors?
7. How are our products or services positioned relative to major competitors?
8. To what extent are new firms entering and old firms leaving this industry?
9. What key factors have resulted in our present competitive position in this industry?
10.How have the sales and profit rankings of our major competitors in the industry
changed over recent years? Why have these rankings changed that way?
11.What is the nature of supplier and distributor relationships in this industry?
12.To what extent could substitute products or services be a threat to our competitors?
7-25
Competitive Intelligence Programs
❖Competitive intelligence (CI)
❖a systematic and ethical process for gathering
and analyzing information about the
competition's activities and general business
trends to further a business's own goals
7-26
Competitive Intelligence Programs
The three basic objectives of a CI program are:
Ch 3 -29
The Five-Forces Model of
Competition
1. Identify key aspects or elements of each
competitive force that impact the firm.
7-31
The Five-Forces Model
TABLE 7-7 Conditions That Cause High Rivalry Among Competing Firms
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
1. When the number of competing firms is high
2. When competing firms are of similar size
3. When competing firms have similar capabilities
4. When the demand for an industry’s products is falling
5. When the product or service prices in the industry are falling
6. When consumers can switch brands easily
7. When barriers to leaving the market are high
8. When barriers to entering the market are low
9. When fixed costs are high among competing firms
10. When the product is perishable
11. When rivals have excess capacity
12. When consumer demand is falling
13. When rivals have excess inventory
14. When rivals sell similar products/services
15. When mergers are common in the industry
7-32
The Five-Forces Model
❖Potential Entry of New
Competitors
7-33
Barriers to Entry
❖Need to gain economies of scale quickly
❖Need to gain technology and specialized know-
how
❖Lack of experience
❖Strong customer loyalty
❖Strong brand preferences
❖Large capital requirements
❖Lack of adequate distribution channels
7-34
Barriers to Entry
❖Government regulatory policies
❖Tariffs
❖Lack of access to raw materials
❖Possession of patents
❖Undesirable locations
❖Counterattack by entrenched firms
❖Potential saturation of the market
7-35
The Five-Forces Model
❖Potential development of
substitute products
❖Pressure increases when:
7-36
The Five-Forces Model
❖Bargaining Power of Suppliers is
increased when (there are):
❖Few suppliers
❖Few substitutes
❖Costs of switching raw materials is high
❖Backward integration is gaining control or
ownership of suppliers
7-37
The Five-Forces Model
❖Bargaining power of consumers
❖Customers being concentrated or
buying in volume affects intensity of
competition
❖Consumer power is higher where
products are standard or
undifferentiated
7-38
Conditions Where Consumers Gain
Bargaining Power
1. If buyers can inexpensively switch
2. If buyers are particularly important
3. If sellers are struggling in the face of falling
consumer demand
4. If buyers are informed about sellers' products,
prices, and costs
5. If buyers have discretion in whether and when
they purchase the product
7-39
Sources of External Information
❖Unpublished sources include customer
surveys, market research, speeches at
professional and shareholders' meetings,
television programs, interviews, and
conversations with stakeholders.
❖Published sources of strategic information
include periodicals, journals, reports,
government documents, abstracts, books,
directories, newspapers, and manuals.
7-40
Sources of External Information
❖http://finance.yahoo.com
❖ www.hoovers.com
❖ http://globaledge.msu.edu/industries/
7-41
Forecasting Tools and Techniques
❖Forecasts
7-42
Making Assumptions
❖Assumptions
❖Best present estimates of the impact of
major external factors, over which the
manager has little if any control, but
which may exert a significant impact on
performance or the ability to achieve
desired results.
7-43
Business Analytics
7-44
Industry Analysis: The External Factor
Evaluation (EFE) Matrix
7-45
The EFE matrix is the strategic tool used to evaluate firm existing strategies, EFE matrix can be
defined as the strategic tool to evaluate external environment or macro environment of the firm
include economic, social, technological, government, political, legal and competitive information.
EFE Matrix is an analytical technique for evaluation of external position of the organization or its
strategic intents.
Opportunities
Opportunities are the chances exist in the external environment, it depends firm whether the firm is
willing to exploit the opportunities or may be they ignore the opportunities due to lack of resources.
Threats
Threats are always evil for the firm, minimum no of threats in the external environment open many
doors for the firm. Maximum number of threats for the firm reduce their power in the industry.
RATING
Rating in EFE matrix represent the response of firm toward the opportunities and threats. Highest
the rating better the response of the firm to exploit opportunities and defend the threats. Rating
range from 1.0 to 4.0 and can be applied to any factor whether it comes under opportunities or
threats.[sky]
Ch 3 -46
There are some important point related to rating in EFE matrix.
WEIGHT
Weight attribute in EFE matrix indicates the relative importance of factor to being successful in the
firm’s industry. The weight range from 0.0 means not important and 1.0 means important, sum of all
assigned weight to factors must be equal to 1.0 otherwise the calculation would not be consider
correct.
WEIGHTED SCORE
Weighted score value is the result achieved after multiplying each factor rating with the weight.
2. Assign to each factor a weight that ranges from 0.0 (not important) to 1.0 (very important). The weight
indicates the relative importance of that factor to being successful in the firm’s industry. Opportunities
often receive higher weights than threats, but threats too can receive high weights if they are especially
severe or threatening. Appropriate weights can be determined by comparing successful with
unsuccessful competitors or by discussing the factor and reaching a group consensus. The sum of all
weights assigned to the factors must equal 1.0.
3. Assign a 1 to 4 rating to each key external factor to indicate how effectively the firm’s current strategies
respond to the factor, where 4 = the response is superior, 3 = the response is above average, 2 = the
response is average, and 1 = the response is poor: Ratings are based on effectiveness of the firm’s
strategies. Ratings are thus company-based, whereas the weights in Step 2 are industry-based. It is
important to note that both threats and opportunities can receive a 1, 2, 3, or 4.
5. Sum the weighted scores for each variable to determine the total weighted score for the organization.
Ch 3 -48
Interpreting the score:
Regardless of the number of key opportunities and threats included in an External Factor
Evaluation (EFE) Matrix, the highest possible total weighted score for an organization is
4.0 and the lowest possible total weighted score is 1.0. The average total weighted score
is 2.5. A total weighted score of 4.0 indicates that an organization is responding in an
outstanding way to existing opportunities and threats in its industry. In other words, the
firm’s strategies effectively take advantage of existing opportunities and minimize the
potential adverse effect of external threats. A total score of 1.0 indicates that the firm’s
strategies are not capitalizing on opportunities or avoiding external threats.
The External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix is similar to Internal Factor Evaluation (EFE)
Matrix. The major difference between the EFE matrix and the IFE matrix is the type of
factors that are included in the model. While the IFE matrix deals with internal factors, the
EFE matrix is concerned solely with external factors.
Ch 3 -49
Ch 3 -50
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Publishing
Ch 3as
-51Prentice Hall
EFE Matrix for a Local Ten-Theater
Cinema Complex
7-52
Industry Analysis: Competitive
Profile Matrix (CPM)
❖Identifies firm's major competitors
and their strengths & weaknesses in
relation to a sample firm's strategic
positions
7-53
CPM
CPM, or the CPM Matrix, stands for Competitive Profile Matrix and is a powerful strategic
analysis tool. CPM allows business owners, stockholders and other interested parties to see
the strengths and weaknesses of all major competitors in an industry on a single page.
The Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) is a tool that compares the firm and its rivals and
reveals their relative strengths and weaknesses.
In order to better understand the external environment and the competition in a particular
industry, firms often use CPM. The matrix identifies a firm’s key competitors and compares
them using industry’s critical success factors. The analysis also reveals company’s relative
strengths and weaknesses against its competitors, so a company would know, which areas it
should improve and, which areas to protect. An example of a matrix is demonstrated below.
Competitive profile matrix is an essential strategic management tool to compare the firm with
the major players of the industry. Competitive profile matrix show the clear picture to the firm
about their strong points and weak points relative to their competitors. The CPM score is
measured on basis of critical success factors, each factor is measured in same scale mean
the weight remain same for every firm only rating varies. The best thing about CPM that it
include your firm and also facilitate to add other competitors make easier the comparative
analysis.
WEIGHTED SCORE
Weighted score value is the result achieved after multiplying each factor rating with the
weight.
Ch 3 -55
Industry Analysis: Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
◼ Identifies firm’s major competitors and their strengths & weaknesses in relation
to a sample firm’s strategic positions
◼ Rating in CPM represent the response of firm toward the critical success factors.
Highest the rating better the response of the firm towards the critical success
factor ,rating range from 1.0 to 4.0 and can be applied to any factor.
Ch 3 -56
Industry Analysis: Competitive Profile
Matrix (CPM)
❖ Identifies firm's major competitors and their strengths &
weaknesses in relation to a sample firm's strategic
positions
❖ Critical success factors include internal and external
issues
Table 3.10
An Example Competitive Profile Matrix
Note: The ratings values are as follows: 1 = response is poor, 2 = response is average, 3 = response is above
average, 4 = response is superior. As indicated by the total weighted score of 2.20, Company 3 is performing
worst. Only 8 critical success factors are included for simplicity; in actuality, however, this is too few. The
template asks that 12 factors be included and to tailor factors to a given industry.
Ch 3 -59
An Example Competitive
Profile Matrix
TABLE 7-12 An Example Competitive Profile Matrix
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Company 1 Company 2 Company 3____________
Critical Success
Factors_ ___ _ Weight Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score____ ____
Advertising 0.20 1 0.20 4 0.80 3 0.60
Product Quality 0.10 4 0.40 3 0.30 2 0.20
Price Competitiveness 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 1 0.10
Management 0.10 4 0.40 3 0.20 1 0.10
Financial Position 0.15 4 0.60 2 0.30 3 0.45
Customer Loyalty 0.10 4 0.40 3 0.30 2 0.20
Global Expansion 0.20 4 0.80 1 0.20 2 0.40
Market Share 0.05 1 0.05 4 0.20 3 0.15
Total 1.00 3.15 2.50 2.20
Note: The ratings values are as follows: 1 = major weakness, 2 = minor weakness, 3 = minor strength, 4 =
major strength. As indicated by the total weighted score of 2.50, Competitor 2 is weakest. Only eight
critical success factors are included for simplicity; this is too few in actuality.
7-60
Ch 3 -61
Ch 3 -62
Industry Analysis CPM
Important –
Ch 3 -63
Strategic Management Concepts: A
Competitive Advantage Approach,
Concepts and Cases
Seventeenth Edition, Global Edition
Chapter 4
Ch 4 -3
Ch 4 -4
Internal of Organisation
◼ Management
◼ HRM
◼ Focusing on ◼ Marketing
the department ◼ OPM-manufacturing / production/
that running operation
the show
◼ MIS
◼ R&D
Organizational culture
◼ Finance / Accounting
◼ Kitchen department
◼ House keeping
Identify Strength and weakness ◼ Front Desk
◼ Back office
◼ Customer Service
◼ Operators
◼ etc.
Ch 4 -5
The Process of Performing an Internal
Audit
◼ The internal audit
❑ Requires gathering, assimilating, and prioritizing
Ch 4 -8
Key Internal Forces
Distinctive Competencies:
❑ A firm’s strengths that cannot be easily matched or
imitated by competitors
❑ Building competitive advantages involves taking
advantage of distinctive competencies
Ch 4 -9
Internal Audit
Involvement in performing an
internal strategic-management audit
provides a vehicle for understanding
the nature and effect of decisions in
other functional business areas of
the firm
Ch 4 -10
Internal Audit
Exemplifies complexity of
relationships among functional areas
of the business
Ch 4 -12
Resource Based View (RBV)
Approach to Competitive Advantage
Internal resources are more important than external factors
• The resource-based view (RBV) is a managerial framework used to determine the
strategic resources a firm can exploit to achieve sustainable competitive
advantage. The RBV focuses managerial attention on the firm's internal resources
in an effort to identify those assets, capabilities and competencies with the
potential to deliver superior competitive advantages.
• The supporters of this view argue that organizations should look inside the
company to find the sources of competitive advantage instead of looking at
competitive environment for it.
Ch 4 -13
RESOURCE BASED VIEW (RBV)
◼ Three All-Encompassing Categories
1. Physical resources – Plant (Place) & Equipment/ Location/
technology/ raw materials/ Machines
2. Human resources – Employees/ Training / Experience
3. Organizational resources – Firm Structure/ Planning Process/
Information Systems/ Patents / Copyrights
◼ Empirical Indicators
◼ Rare
◼ Hard to imitate
◼ Not easily substitutable
Resource Based View (RBV)
◼ The Resource-Based View (RB V) Approach
❑ contends that internal resources are more important
❑ intangible
Organizational Culture
Organizational culture is “a pattern of
behaviour that has been developed by an
organization as it learns to cope with its
problem of external adaptation and internal
integration and that has worked well enough to
be considered valid and to be taught to new
members as the correct way to perceive, think,
and feel.”
Ch 4 -16
Ch 4 -17
Ch 4 -18
Ch 4 -19
Table 4.4
Aspects of Organizational Culture
Dimension Low Degree Degree Degree High
1. Strong work ethic; arrive early and leave late 1 2 3 4 5
2. High ethical beliefs; clear code of business ethics followed 1 2 3 4 5
3. Formal dress; shirt and tie expected 1 2 3 4 5
4. Informal dress; many casual dress days 1 2 3 4 5
5. Socialize together outside of work 1 2 3 4 5
6. Do not question supervisor’s decision 1 2 3 4 5
7. Encourage whistle-blowing 1 2 3 4 5
8. Be health conscious; have a wellness program 1 2 3 4 5
9. Allow substantial “working from home” 1 2 3 4 5
10. Encourage creativity, innovation, and open-mindedness 1 2 3 4 5
11. Support women and minorities; no glass ceiling 1 2 3 4 5
12. Be highly socially responsible; be philanthropic 1 2 3 4 5
13. Have numerous meetings 1 2 3 4 5
14. Have a participative management style 1 2 3 4 5
15. Preserve the natural environment; have a sustainability 1 2 3 4 5
program
Organizational Culture
◼ Resistant to change
◼ May represent:
❑ Strength
❑ Weakness
Ch 4 -21
Integrating Strategy & Culture
Values
Legends Beliefs
Cultural
Heroes Rites
Products
Symbols Rituals
Myths
Ch 4 -22
Integrating Strategy & Culture
Functions of Management
1. Planning
2. Organizing
3. Motivating
4. Staffing
5. Controlling
Ch 4 -24
Management
Stage When Most
Function Important
Planning Strategy Formulation
Ch 4 -25
Management
Planning
Ch 4 -26
Management
Developing a mission
Choosing strategies to
pursue
Ch 4 -27
Planning
◼ Synergy
Ch 4 -28
Management
Organizing
Ch 4 -29
Management
◼ Organizing
Ch 4 -30
Management
Motivating
◼ Influencing to accomplish specific objectives
◼ Four components include:
❑ Leadership
❑ Group dynamics
❑ Communication
❑ Organizational change
Ch 4 -31
Management
Staffing
◼ Personnel management
◼ Human resource management
Ch 4 -32
Management
Staffing
◼ Recruiting ◼ Evaluating
◼ Interviewing ◼ Rewarding
◼ Testing ◼ Disciplining
◼ Selecting ◼ Promoting
◼ Orienting ◼ Transferring
◼ Training ◼ Demoting
◼ Developing ◼ Dismissing
◼ Caring for
Ch 4 -33
Management
Controlling
Ch 4 -34
Management
Controlling
Ch 4 -36
Management Audit Checklist
Ch 4 -37
Management Audit Checklist
Ch 4 -38
Marketing
1. Defining
2. Anticipating
3. Creating
4. Fulfilling
Ch 4 -39
Marketing
Marketing Functions
1. Customer analysis
2. Selling products/services
4. Pricing
5. Distribution
6. Marketing research
7. Opportunity analysis
Ch 4 -40
Five Basic Activities in Marketing
and wants
Marketing
Customer surveys
Consumer information
Market positioning
Customer
strategies
Analysis
Customer profiles
Market segmentation
strategies
Ch 4 -43
Marketing
Advertising
Sales Promotion
Publicity
Selling
Products/Services Personal Selling
Sales force management
Customer relations
Dealer relations
Ch 4 -44
Ch 4 -45
Marketing
Test marketing
Brand positioning
Devising warranties
Packaging
Product/Service Product features/options
Planning Product style
Quality
Deleting old products
Providing for customer
service
Ch 4 -46
Marketing
Consumers
Governments
Pricing
Suppliers
Major Stakeholders Distributors
Competitors
Ch 4 -47
Marketing
Warehousing
Distribution channels
Retail site locations
Distribution Sales territories
Inventory levels
Transportation
Wholesaling
Retailing
Ch 4 -48
Marketing
Gather data
Analyze data
Assessing costs
Assessing risks
Ch 4 -50
Marketing Audit
1. Are markets segmented effectively?
Ch 4 -51
Marketing Audit
Ch 4 -52
Marketing Audit
Ch 4 -53
Finance/Accounting
3. Dividend decision
Ch 4 -54
Growth Ratios
Ch 4 -55
Table 4.9 A Summary of Key Financial
Ratios (1 of 4)
Ratio How Calculated What it measures
Ratios
Sales minus cost of goods sold the total margin available to cover
Gross Profit Start fraction sales minus cost of goods sold over sales end fraction.
Ch 4 -65
Production/Operations
Production/Operations Functions
◼ Process
◼ Capacity
◼ Inventory
◼ Workforce
◼ Quality
Ch 4 -66
Ch 4 -67
Production/Operations Audit
Ch 4 -68
Production/Operations Audit
Ch 4 -69
Research & Development
Use percent-of-sales
method
R&D Budgets
Budgeting relative to
competitors
Ch 4 -71
Research & Development Audit
Ch 4 -72
Research & Development Audit
Ch 4 -73
Management Information Systems
Purpose
◼ Improve performance of an
enterprise by improving the quality
of managerial decisions
Ch 4 -74
Management Information Systems
Audit
◼ Do all managers use the information system
to make decisions?
◼ Is there a CIO or Director of Information
Systems position in the firm?
◼ Are data updated regularly?
◼ Do managers from all functional areas
contribute input to the information system?
◼ Are there effective passwords for entry into
the firm’s information system?
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Ch 4 -75
Publishing as Prentice Hall
Management Information Systems
Audit
◼ Are strategists of the firm familiar with the
information systems of rival firms?
◼ Is the information system user-friendly?
◼ Do all users understand the competitive
advantages that information can provide?
◼ Are computer training workshops provided for
users?
◼ Is the firm’s system being improved?
Ch 4 -76
Value Chain Analysis
Ch 4 -77
Value Chain Analysis
◼ Core competencies
◼ Distinctive competencies
◼ Benchmarking
Ch 4 -78
Transforming Value Chain Activities into Sustained
Competitive Advantage
Value Some
Chain Some Core Distinctive
Core
Activities Competencies Competencie
Competencies
Are Evolve into s Yield
Arise in Some
Identified Distinctive Sustained
Activities
and Competencies Competitive
Assessed Advantages
Ch 4 -79
Figure 4.3
How to Gain and Sustain Competitive Advantages
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Ch 4 -81
Publishing as Prentice Hall
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix is a strategy tool used to evaluate
firm’s internal environment and to reveal its strengths as well as
weaknesses.
IFE Matrix. Strengths and weaknesses are used as the key internal factors
in the evaluation. When looking for the strengths, ask what do you do
better or have more valuable than your competitors have? In case of the
weaknesses, ask which areas of your company you could improve and at
least catch up with your competitors?
The general rule is to identify 10-20 key external factors and additional 10-
20 key internal factors, but you should identify as many factors as
possible.
In our first example, the most significant factors are ‘Processed food
market growing by 15% next year in our largest market.’ (0.24 points), ‘The
contract with the main customer expires in 2 months.’ (0.17 points) and
‘New law, requiring decreasing the amount of sugar in the food by 20%,
could be passed next year.’ (0.14 points).
Ch 4 -83
Ratings
IFE Matrix. The ratings in internal matrix refer to how strong or weak
each factor is in a firm. The numbers range from 4 to 1, where 4 means
a major strength, 3 – minor strength, 2 – minor weakness and 1 – major
weakness. Strengths can only receive ratings 3 & 4, weaknesses – 2 &
1. The process of assigning ratings in IFE matrix can be done easier
using benchmarking tool.
Chapter 5
Strategies in Action
Source: Fred R. David, “How Companies Define Their Mission,” Long Range Planning 22, no. 1
(February 1989): 91. See also Anik Ratnaningsih, Nadjadji Anwar, Patdono Suwignjo, and Putu Artama
Wiguna, “Balance Scorecard of David’s Strategic Modeling at Industrial Business for National
Construction Contractor of Indonesia,” Journal of Mathematics and Technology, no. 4 (October 2010):
20.
Chapter outline: Focus of the chapter
► Long-term objectives represent the results expected from pursuing certain strategies. Strategies
represent the actions to be taken to accomplish long-term objectives.
► Objectives are essential for organizational success because they state direction, aid in evaluation,
create synergy, reveal priorities, focus coordination, and provide a basis for effective planning,
organizing, motivating and controlling activities.
Ch 5 -4
Varying Performance Measures by
Organizational Level
4-5
The Nature of Long-Term
Objectives
❖Objectives
❖provide direction
❖allow synergy
❖assist in evaluation
❖establish priorities
❖reduce uncertainty
❖minimize conflicts
❖stimulate exertion
❖aid in both the allocation of resources and the
design of jobs
4-6
Financial versus Strategic Objectives
❖ Financial objectives include growth in revenues,
growth in earnings, higher dividends, larger profit
margins, greater return on investment, higher earnings
per share, a rising stock price, improved cash flow, and
so on.
❖ Strategic objectives include a larger market share,
quicker on-time delivery than rivals, shorter design-to-
market times than rivals, lower costs than rivals, higher
product quality than rivals, wider geographic coverage
than rivals, achieving technological leadership,
consistently getting new or improved products to
market ahead of rivals, and so on.
4-7
Levels of Strategies with Persons
Most Responsible
4-8
❖Most organizations simultaneously pursue a
combination of two or more strategies, but a
combination strategy can be exceptionally risky
if carried too far.
❖No organization can afford to pursue all the
strategies that might benefit the firm.
❖Difficult decisions must be made and priorities
must be established.
Ch 5 -9
STRATEGIES SUB-STRATEGIES INFORMATION
1. Vertical Integration 1.1 Forward Integration Gaining ownership or increased control over
Strategies distributors or retailers
1.2 Backward Seeking ownership or increased control of a firm’s
Integration suppliers
2. Intensive Strategies 2.1 Market Seeking increased market share for present products
Penetration or services in present markets through greater
marketing efforts
2.2 Market Development Introducing present products or services into new
geographic areas
Forward
Integration
Vertical Backward
Integration Integration
Strategies
Horizontal
Integration
Ch 5 -11
Vertical Integration Strategies
Forward Gaining ownership or increased
Integration control over distributors or retailers
Ch 5 -12
Ch 6 -13
Ch 6 -14
Ch 6 -15
Types of Strategies
Market
Penetration
Intensive Market
Strategies Development
Product
Development
Ch 5 -16
Intensive Strategies
Seeking increased market share for
Market present products or services in
Penetration present markets through greater
marketing efforts
Ch 5 -17
Ch 6 -18
Ch 6 -19
Ch 6 -20
Ch 6 -21
Types of Strategies
Related
Diversification
Diversification
Strategies
Unrelated
Diversification
Ch 5 -22
Diversification Strategies
Adding new but related products or services
Transferring competitively valuable expertise, technological know-
how, or other capabilities from one business to another
Combining the related activities of separate businesses into a single
Related Diversification operation to achieve lower costs
Exploiting common use of a known brand name
Using cross-business collaboration to create strengths
Ch 5 -23
Related Diversification Guidelines
◼ When an organization competes in a no-growth or a
slow-growth industry
◼ When adding new, but related, products would
significantly enhance the sales of current products
◼ When new, but related, products could be offered at
highly competitive prices
◼ When new, but related, products have seasonal sales
levels that counterbalance an organization’s existing
peaks and valleys
◼ When an organization’s products are currently in the
declining stage of the product’s life cycle
◼ When an organization has a strong management team
Diversification Strategies
Unrelated Diversification
Adding new, unrelated products or services
Ch 5 -25
Unrelated Diversification Guidelines (1
of 2)
Retrenchment
Defensive Divestiture
Strategies
Liquidation
Ch 5 -30
Defensive Strategies
Ch 5 -31
Ch 6 -32
Ch 6 -33
Table 5.3 (1 of 2)
Alternative Strategies Defined and Exemplified
Copyright ©2017
4-36
Pearson Education,
Limited
Competitive market focus
Ch 5 -37
- Product/ services
differentiate
- The firm has unique
-Produce at resources
lowest lost - Target customer not
- Deliver price sensitive
goods/services at - - Customers have
lowest cost (main specific needs/ loyalty
strategy) - Brand image / services
Ch 5 -39
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Ch 5 -40
Publishing as Prentice Hall
Type 1 or 2 Cost Leadership Strategy
Conditions
◼ Vigorous price competition
◼ Plentiful supply of identical products
◼ Little product differentiation
◼ Products used in same ways
◼ Low cost to switch
◼ Large buyers with power
◼ Industry newcomers use low prices to attract
buyers
Ch 5 -41
Type 3 Differentiation Strategy
Conditions
◼ Many ways to differentiate and buyers
perceive the differences as having value
◼ Diverse buyer needs and uses
◼ Few rival firms following similar
differentiation approach
◼ Fast paced technological change and
evolving product features
Ch 5 -42
Type 4 or 5 Focus Strategy
Conditions
◼ Large, profitable, and growing target market
niche
◼ Industry leaders do not consider the niche
crucial to their success
◼ Industry leaders consider it costly or difficult
to meet the needs of this niche
◼ Industry has many niches and segments
◼ Few rivals are specializing on this target
segment
Ch 5 -43
Means for Achieving Strategies
◼ Merger / acquisition
◼ Outsourcing
Ch 5 -44
Cooperation among competitors = Coopetition (looking +ve on comp)
- Bringing out the best of each competitors
- Saving company resources
- Using win-win strategy
- Building good relationship
- Helping economic grow
- etc
Example:
• Proton Holdings and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group today signed a Heads of Agreement to set up a joint venture (JV)
that will pave the way for Malaysian automaker Proton to assemble and market its cars in China.
• Google parent company and the pharma company Glaxo and Smith decided to enter into a joint venture agreement to
produce bioelectric medicines the ratio of the ownership was 45%-55%. The joint venture lasted and was committed for
7 years with a capital of Euro 540 million.
• Another example of a joint venture is the joint venture between the taxi giant UBER and the heavy vehicle
manufacturer Volvo. The joint venture goal was to produce driverless cars The ratio of the ownership is 50%-50%. The
business worth was $350 million as per the agreement in the joint venture.
• Sony and Ericson’s example is also a good example of Joint Venture as they joined hands to manufacture
smartphones and gadgets. After several operating years, Sony eventually acquired Ericson mobile manufacturing
division.
Ch 5 -46
Merger & Acquisitions - Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is a general term used
to describe the consolidation of companies or assets through various types of
financial transactions. The terms "mergers" and "acquisitions" are often used
interchangeably, although in actuality, they hold slightly different meanings.
Acquisitions - When one company takes over another entity, and establishes itself as the new
owner, the purchase is called an acquisition.
• Disney and Pixar / Marvel Acquisition.
• Verizon and Vodafone Acquisition. ...
Merger - a merger describes two firms of approximately the same size, who join forces to move
forward as a single new entity, rather than remain separately owned and operated. A merger is the
combination of two firms, which subsequently form a new legal entity under the banner of one
corporate name.
• Exxon and Mobile Merger.
• Vodafone and Mannesmann Merger.
• Kencana Petroleum Bhd and SapuraCrest Petroleum Bhd known as SapuraKencana Pertroleum
Bhd
Ch 5 -48
1st mover advantage - A first mover is a service or product that gains a
competitive advantage by being the first to market with a product or service.
- customer loyalty, strong brand, recognition
Facebook wasn’t the first social media network. MySpace, LinkedIn, and hi5 all came before Facebook.
Google wasn’t the first search engine. Remember Ask Jeeves, Lycos, and Dogpile?
Apple wasn’t the first computer company. IBM and Hewlett-Packard came decades before.
Yes, some companies which were first-to-market are now quite successful.
1.The founder of Mercedes-Benz invented the first gas-powered car.
2.Thomas Edison founded many electric products. He began as the Edison Company, which later became General Electric (GE).
3.Intel created the first commercially available microprocessor in 1971.
◼ Telekom
◼ TNB
◼ Maxis
Ch 5 -50
Strategic Management in Nonprofit and
Governmental Organizations
◼Educational Institutions
◼Medical Organizations
◼Governmental Agencies and
Departments
Ch 5 -51