Hippocrates and The Plague
Hippocrates and The Plague
In the plague year of 1665, as the Black Death raged in London town, the July 13
issue of the Newes carried an advertisement for a remedy against the epidemic,
"wherewith Hippocrates, the Prince of all Physitians, preserved the whole land of
Greece."! Two months earlier that same year the College of Physicians in London
had recommended in its Certain Necessary Directions for the Cure of Plague that
fires be lit in the streets to correct the "infectious air."2 It was also helpful to strew
aromatic substances on these smoking bonfires. William Boghurst, in
Loimographia: an Account of the Great Plague of London in the Year 1665,
suggested the burning of "pitch, resin, turpentine ... frankincense ... sulpher,
benjamin, mirrhe, also some aromatic things as nutmeg, cloves, bayberries." These
could be burned alone or with wood with "gums, spices, roses, or any sweet
flowers being added to them."3
That these anti-plague treatments were related to each other and to Hippocrates
emerges from A Dialogue Against the Pestilence, written a century earlier in 1564.
William Bullein described Hippocrates' use of fire to save the citizens of Athens
during the famous epidemic that decimated that city at the beginning of the
Peloponnesian War, and he even cited his source, Theriac to Piso, written by Galen
in the late second or early third century A.D.4
Now Thucydides' account of the devastating so-called plague at Athens in 430
B.C. needs no introduction today, nor did it in the sixteenth century. Thucydides
clearly stated that physicians were helpless against the disease and were often
themselves the first victims. 5 Yet Bullein, the College of Physicians, and the
1 W.G. Bell, The Great Plague in London in 1665 (London, 1924; rptd. New York, 1979), p.
97.
2 Bell, p. 237.
3 W. Boghurst, Loimographia: An Account of the Great Plague of London in the Year 1665,
ed. J.F. Payne (London, 1894; rptd. New York, 1979), pp. 62-63.
4 G. Watson, Theriac and Mithridatium: A Study in Therapeutics (London, 1966), pp. 118-
119. For the authorship and dating of Theriac to Piso, see nn. 77, 78.
5 Plague is the traditional term used for the epidemic at Athens in 430 B.C., that Thucydides
described in The Peloponnesian War 2.47-54. Although objections have been raised to the noun,
plague, and its adjectival form, pestilential, because they have inescapable associations with
bubonic plague, which is caused by a specific organism (Yersinia pestis), the word plague is
traditionally used in translations and scholarship in English to refer both to the mysterious
epidemic recorded in the Hellenistic pseudepigrapha, as well as to the highly infectious disease in
Thucydides' fifth-century B.C. account. For this reason I do use plague in this chapter, but when
I do not qualify the word by the adjective bubonic, the term means no more than epidemic, that is,
any widespread outbreak of a disease, especially one with a high death rate.
Although the consensus today is that the Athenian epidemic was definitely not bubonic plague,
the identity of the disease remains problematic. The symptoms of the outbreak, as described by
Thucydides, do not match exactly those of any known modem disease, though many candidates
opportunistic advertiser mentioned above all accepted the ancient tradition that there
was one physician who could, indeed, cure epidemics like the one that struck
Athens-a report that flatly contradicted Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian
War. That doctor was Hippocrates. Pliny, Galen, and Aetius described how he
fought the epidemic by building a great fire, which corrected the unhealthy
atmosphere that caused the outbreak. Thucydides' silence about this remarkable
achievement of Hippocrates and the late date of the sources reporting it provide
strong evidence against its historicity. The tradition itself, however, as we have
seen, had a long history, outlasting antiquity to spring up in both Western and
Eastern medicine whenever fear of plague-bubonic or other-stalked the land.
Where did this fabulous story come from that Hippocrates stopped the epidemic
at Athens by burning a fire? What was the relationship between this later report and
the Hellenistic tradition about Hippocrates and the epidemic that threatened all
Greece, mentioned in the Embassy, Speech from the Altar, Decree of the Athenians,
and The Life of Hippocrates According to Soranus (VHSS)? None of these
accounts mentions Hippocrates' use of fire in connection with this panhellenic
epidemic that swept down on Greece from the northwest lands of Illyria and
Paeonia. Since the mid-nineteenth century Hippocrates' modern biographers have
also kept their silence about the later report that he cured the Athenian epidemic with
fire, probably because it is worthless as historical evidence for his life. 6 This
have been proposed. Until 1984 two "diagnoses" stood out in the scholarly literature on the
Athenian plague-smallpox and endemic typhus. For summaries of the arguments, see R.J.
Littman and M.L. Littman, "The Athenian Plague: Smallpox," Trans. Proc. Am. Philo/. Assoc.
100 (1969) 261-275, and J. Scarborough, "Thucydides, Greek Medicine, and the Plague at
Athens," Episteme 4 (1970) 77-90 (typhus, with summaries of other diagnoses). More recent
contributors to the debate included J.C.F. Poole and A.J. Holladay, "Thucydides and the Plague at
Athens,"CQ, n.s. 29 (1979) 282-300, and J. Longrigg, "The Plague of Athens," Hist. Sci. 18
(1980) 209-225 (both essays deny that any diagnosis is possible), and J. Wylie and H. Stubbs,
"The Plague of Athens: 430--428 B.C., Epidemic and Epizootic," CQ, n.s. 33 (1983) 6-11. Then
an interdisciplinary conference in 1984 at the University of Arizona on the identity of the plague of
Athens resulted in the controversial article by A. Langmuir et al., ''The Thucydides Syndrome: a
New Hypothesis for the Cause of the Plague of Athens," N Engl J Med 313 (1985) 1027-1030.
There they diagnosed the epidemic as a staphylococcus infection similar to that which produced
TSST-1 (Toxic Shock Syndrome) superimposed on influenza. This diagnosis was subsequently
challenged in a letter to the editor of the N Engl J Med 314 (1986) 855, by D. Morens and M.C
Chu, who found that reservoir diseases like Rift Valley Fever most closely fit the symptoms
described by Thucydides. Most recently a panel on the topic at the 1987 meeting of the Society for
Ancient Medicine and Pharmacy at New York City, Dec. 29, 1987, seemed to concur with Dr.
Morens' paper, which concluded that only reservoir diseases, which included anthrax, typhus, and
arbo-viruses, such as Rift Valley Fever, could meet the criteria of persistence (the epidemic
continued for two to four years) and nonexportability, as well as match Thucydides' symptoms
(summaries of the papers in the Society for Ancient Medicine and Pharmacy Newsletter 16 (1988)
6-8).
6 One could attempt, therefore, to preserve the historicity of the Hippocratic plague by
dissociating it from the Athenian epidemic of 430 B.C., as did C. Petersen, "Zeit und
Lebensverhliltnisse des Hippokrates," Philologus 4 (1849) 234-237. Petersen's hopeful theory was
easily demolished. See the reply by E. Littre in Littre 7.xl-xliv.
The story of Hippocrates and the plague reaches back to the earliest level of
biographical fiction created about the figure of Hippocrates, namely the Embassy. 8
In this fictional speech Hippocrates' son, Thessalus, is trying to dissuade the
Athenian assembly from attacking Cos. 9 Thessalus' argument rests on four great
services that his family has rendered to the Athenians. He relates in chronological
order how his ancestors, Chrysos and Nebros, helped the Athenians and the
Amphictyons in their war against the Criseans---Nebros by poisoning the Criseans'
water supply; 10 how his ancestors caused the Coans to resist the Persians and side
with the rest of the Greeks during the Persian wars; 11 how Hippocrates helped the
7 To date no other scholar has examined the later tradition that Hippocrates used fire to cure
epidemics. Earlier versions of this chapter appeared in J. Rubin [Pinault], "Biographical Fiction in
the Lives of Hippocrates" (Ph.D. diss., U. of Penn., 1983), pp. 76-l23, and J. Rubin Pinault,
"How Hippocrates Cured the Plague," JHMAS 41 (1986) 52-75. My thanks to the editors of the
JHMAS for allowing me to reprint substantial parts of the latter in this chapter.
8 For Greek text and translation, see W.D. Smith, Hippocrates: Pseudepigraphic Writings
(Leiden, 1990), pp. 110-125.
9 On the mixture of fiction and anachronistic facts in the Embassy, see S.M. Sherwin-White,
Ancient Cos (Gottingen, 1978), p. 15, and R. Herzog, Koische Forschungen und Funde (Leipzig,
1899), p. 215. On the fictional nature of the Coans' refusal to submit to the Persians, see
Sherwin-White, p. 15; on the "apparently wholly mythical" plan of Athens to attack Cos and the
plague that threatened all Greece, see W.D. Smith, The Hippocratic Tradition (Ithaca, 1979), pp.
215-216. See Herzog, p. 215, n. 2; J. Bousquet, "Inscriptions de Delphes," Bulletin de
Correspondance Hellenique 80 (1956) 579-593; and H. Pomtow, "Delphische Neufund, III.
Hippokrates und die Asklepiaden in Delphi," Klio 15 (1918) 303-338, for arguments based on
archaeological evidence that support the historical authenticity of the Embassy. For a review of
this position and a rebuttal, see Smith, pp. 216-218. The most recent assessment is by Smith in
Pseud, pp. 6-18.
10 Littre 9.406-414; Pseud, pp.111-115.
11 Littre 9.414-418; Pseud, pp. 114-117.
Athenians and other Greeks when they were threatened by an epidemic; 12 and how
Thessalus provided medical services to the Athenians during the Sicilian expedition
at Hippocrates' request. 13 Hippocrates' efforts against the epidemic are described as
follows:
I come now to present to you, who know it well, the good service of my father,
Hippocrates. And in recounting it I would be speaking only the truth.
When the plague ran through the land of the barbarians that lies above the Illyrians and
Paeonians, when this evil came to this land, the kings of the inhabitants there sent down
for my father in Thessaly (for he had and still has his residence there) due to his reputation
as a physician, which, because it is true, became known all over. Calling on him for
assistance, they said they would not send him gold and silver and other wealth, but, if he
assisted them, he should carry off as much as he wished.
But he inquired what son of movements occurred in succession in the atmospheric heat
and winds and mists and other factors that by nature disturb the accustomed state, contrary
to what is normal. When he had learned by inquiry everything, he answered, ordering them
[the ambassadors] to return and declaring that it was not possible for him to go to their
country.
And as soon as he was able, he himself prepared to prescribe to the Thessalians what
measures were necessary to avoid the approaching danger. Writing down the treatment, he
publicly exhibited it around the cities.
And when he had finished in Thessaly, he moved on, helping the neighboring people.
When he came to Thermopylae, he assisted the Dorians, together with the Phocians. And
when he arrived at Delphi he prayed to the god on behalf of the Hellenes, and after he had
sacrificed, he began to make his way toward the land of the Boeotians. After he had helped
in a comparable manner those who lived there, he came to your land and told you straight
from his heart what measures were suitable for your safety-the ones that I am recalling
now.
And I expect that many of you recognize I speak the truth, for it was not long ago that
these things happened; it is only nine years since I passed through and was ordered to the
Peloponnese to assist those living there.
Everywhere we went we were duly honored in word and in deed, so that we did not
regret that we had not accepted the lucrative offer of the Illyrians and Paeonians. And in
The Embassy's account of Hippocrates and the plague (in contrast to that of the
Decree, below) emphasizes the involvement of Hippocrates' family-his sons,
Thessalus and Dracon-as well as his students. The story does not appear to have
any historical basis, as do the other "services" Thessalus credits his family as
having performed on behalf of the Greeks, and especially the Athenians. 15 For this
reason the Embassy, including its story of Hippocrates and the plague, is best
viewed as a local Coan product, the "fruit of Coan rhetorical writings of the
Hellenistic period." 16 As to its purpose, the Embassy in a narrower sense can be
seen as "an attempt by a family from a minor state to place itself in history."17 In a
larger sense the story promoted local patriotism after the synoecism or political
unification of Cos in 366 B.C. 18 And following the foundation of the sanctuary of
Asclepius on Cos in the late third century B.C., such a story would be in the
interest of the priests, who were trying to associate Hippocrates with the
Asclepeion, and in the interest of Coan physicians, probably because any story that
promoted Hippocrates' prestige would indirectly increase theirs.19
From internal evidence, the Embassy's story about Hippocrates and the plague
can also be seen to represent the earliest of the three great legends developed about
Hippocrates, which are treated in this and the following two chapters. In the
Embassy there is no mention of Artaxerxes or Perdiccas. And yet, I suggest, the
virtues of Hippocrates that are emphasized in the Embassy's account of Hippocrates
and the plague pointed the way for the creation of the stories about Artaxerxes and
Perdiccas. Hippocrates' reputation, which caused the barbarian kings of Illyria and
Paeonia to approach him and offer him great material rewards in the Embassy if he
helped them with the epidemic ravaging their lands, is paralleled in the Artaxerxes
story. So is Hippocrates' patriotic refusal in this incident to use his talents to help
14 Embassy 7. For the passage above I offer my own translation of the newly edited Greek text
by W.D. Smith, Pseud, pp. 116, 118, 120; for an alternative translation, see Smith, Pseud, pp.
117, 119, 121.
15 Smith, Pseud, p. 3. For example, Chrysus and Nebrus' aid to the Athenians and
Amphictyons in besieging the Criseans is based on an incident in the Amphictyonic War; for a
different version, see Pausanias 10.37.6-7. The second service, about how the Coans resisted the
Persians, reads like a patriotic corrective of Herodotus 6.49, 7.99, which implies the Coans'
submission to the Persians; and the fourth connects Hippocrates and Thessalus with the Athenians'
Sicilian Expedition of 415-413 B.C. during the Peloponnesian War (Smith, Pseud, pp. 2-4).
16 Sherwin-White, Ancient Cos, p. 15, following Herzog, p. 215.
17 Smith, Pseud, pp. 2, 5--6, 17.
18 Smith, Hippocratic Tradition, p. 221.
l9 L. Edelstein, RE, supp. vol. 6, col. 1302.60 ff.
Greece's enemy. 20 To a lesser extent the Embassy's plague story influenced the
Perdiccas story. The Embassy's location of Hippocrates' home in northern Greece
placed Hippocrates near Macedonia, where Perdiccas ruled. Again, Hippocrates'
fame brought him to the attention of a powerful monarch.21 Although Perdiccas as a
Macedonian was not a barbarian, his location at the extreme north of the Greek
world fitted him into a role parallel to that of the kings of Illyria and Paeonia and of
Artaxerxes. In all three stories Hippocrates established his ethical superiority by not
limiting his practice to the wealthy court of a king. 22
It is also easy to see that the Embassy's version of the story about Hippocrates
and the plague was written before (if it was not the inspiration for) the other
pseudepigraphic document that records the story, namely the Decree of the
Athenians.23 This fictional decree confers various honors on Hippocrates for the
services he has rendered to the Hellenes. The first service to be recounted is
Hippocrates' effort against the plague. Not only does the Decree commend
Hippocrates for sending his students (no mention of his sons here) all over Greece
to teach people what measures to use to protect themselves from the approaching
epidemic; in addition the Decree praises Hippocrates for publishing his medical
writings in order that physicians could be trained to save people from the epidemic.
There was nothing in the Embassy about Hippocrates' writings. The Decree's
addition, then, presupposes an acquaintance with the Hippocratic Corpus, which
the Embassy does not, and requires us to date the Decree after the formation of the
Hippocratic Collection in Alexandria, which began to be assembled at the beginning
of the third century B.C. 24 Also indicative of a date later than the Embassy is the
Decree's addition of Hippocrates' refusal to help Artaxerxes, when the latter's
troops were struck by an epidemic;25 although this story would have suited the
argument of the Embassy very nicely, it is not mentioned in that document. The
most plausible explanation is that the story about Artaxerxes had not yet been
developed. Here, without further delay, is the Decree:
Decree of the Athenians. The Council and the People of Athens have decreed:
20 See the VHSS, sect. 8, ed. Ilberg, CMG IV, p. 176, 11. 18-22; for Eng. trans., see Chapter
1 of this study, for discussion, Chapter 4.
21 See the VHSS, sect. 5, ed. Ilberg, CMG IV, p. 176, 11. 4-11; for Eng. trans., see Chapter 1,
for discussion, Chapter 3.
22 The parallel is brought out more clearly in Galen's version of the Perdiccas story in That the
Best Physician is also a Philosopher 3: "If there is such a man [the ideal philosopher-physician],
he will look down on Artaxerxes and Perdiccas; he will never even see the former, while he will
treat the latter when he is ill and needs Hippocrates' art but surely will not think it right to stay
with him forever; and he will treat the poor of Cranon, Thasos, and other small towns." Grk. text
ed. J. Marquardt, I. Millier, G. Helmreich, Claudii Galeni Pergameni scripta minora, 3 vols.
(Leipzig, 1884-1893; rptd. Amsterdam, 1967), 2.5. See Chapter 3, pp. 73-74, of this study.
23 Smith, Pseud, p. 4.
24 Smith, Pseud, p. 5.
25 The Decree does not explain why Artaxerxes was requesting Hippocrates' help; presumably
the story was well known.
And whereas on the occasion of a plague coming from the land of the barbarians
towards Hellas, he sent out his pupils to different places to proclaim what therapies they
had to use to keep themselves safe from the imminent plague, and, in order that medical
science bequeathed to the Greeks would preserve safe those that were ill from it he
generously published his writings on medical science because he wanted there to be many
physicians who saved people,
And when the Persian King sent for him on condition of honors equal to his own, and
on condition of whatever gifts Hippocrates chose, he scorned the promises of the barbarian
because he was a foe and the common enemy of Greeks,
Therefore, so that the Athenian people may show itself to desire the best always for the
Greeks and so that they may show proper gratitude to Hippocrates for his beneficent acts,
It is decreed by the people to initiate him into the great mysteries at public expense as
was done with Heracles, the son of 2.eus,
And to crown him with a gold crown worth one thousand gold pieces, and to proclaim
the crown at the great Panathenaia at the athletic competition,
And that it be permitted to all sons of the Coans to be ephebes in Athens, since their
country has begotten such a man,
And that there be for Hippocrates citizenship, and sustenance in the Prytaneum for his
lifetime. 26
In trying to date the Embassy, the earliest version of the story about Hippocrates
and the plague, scholars have looked for political contexts that have suited its
patriotic pro-Greek, anti-barbarian tone. The terminus post quern would have had to
be the synoecism of Cos, since before that date the Coans would not have had the
sense of themselves as a nation that is shown in the Embassy.21 The bias against
Athens that is present in the Embassy had a historical basis in the years 357 to 355
B.C., when the oligarchical party on Cos, greatly aided by Mausolus, gained
power. 28 A few years earlier, in 359 to 358 B.C., Philip II of Macedon conquered
the Paeonians and Illyrians, who were considered barbarians and enemies of
Greece. The patriotism engendered by this political alignment of Greeks and
barbarians fits the situation of the Embassy. 29 The political realities, then, of the
Greek world in the mid fourth century B.C. may be reflected in the fiction of
Hippocrates and the plague.30
Other factors strengthen a mid to late fourth-century date for the story of
Hippocrates and the plague in the Embassy. The Embassy was first mentioned by
name in Erotian's first-century catalogue of Hippocratic writings. 31 These medical
works, together with the pseudepigraphic Embassy and Speech from the Altar, had
probably been assembled into a collection in Alexandria under the Ptolemies, which
brings the date of these fictional speeches back to the beginning of the third century
B.C. 32 Although we cannot prove that the Embassy was in the catalogue of
Hippocratic writings in the Alexandrian library, Wesley Smith has raised the
intriguing possibility that the Embassy and Speech from the Altar, with their
biographical fiction about Hippocrates, offered the only biographical and historical
information about Hippocrates in the collection of anonymous medical works being
assembled at Alexandria. 33 For this very reason these biographical documents may
have supplied the name and identity of an author for the growing collection of
anonymous medical documents.34 This theory, although ultimately unprovable,
would certainly explain why the legend flourished in the early third century, at the
time the Hippocratic Collection was being formed in Alexandria; the story of
Hippocrates and the plague provided curious readers with a stirring exemplum of
the character and deeds they would have expected of the author of this first
collection of medical treatises.
Dating the Decree is no easier. We have already established that the Decree was
written after the Embassy. The honors described in the Decree can, perhaps, be
dated. There is historical precedence in fifth-century decrees for the presentation of
a gold crown to Hippocrates,35 and a fourth-century decree grants the physician
30 On the other hand, the most famous medical historian of the nineteen thirties, Ludwig
Edelstein, found that the historical and political circumstances of the early second century best
accounted for the origin of this legend. Not until 190 B.C., when Ptolemaic sovereignty over Cos
ended, could these stories, with their strong anti-barbarian prejudice, have developed. During the
preceding period, Edelstein explained, Cos had close associations with Ptolemaic Alexandria, where
official policy favored the doctrine that Greeks and barbarians were equal (RE, supp. vol. 6, cols.
1301.44-51). For his other arguments see Rubin, "Biographical Fiction," pp. 81-82.
Of course there is no reason why a story that portrayed Hippocrates as a friend of the Greeks and
an enemy of the barbarians could not have arisen while Cos was under Ptolemaic rule (Smith,
Tradition, 216). Nor is it even necessary to assume a historical basis for the Coan bias against
Athens in the Embassy. See Rubin,"Biographical Fiction," p. 83.
31 See Erotiani vocum Hippocraticum collection, ed. E. Nachmanson (Uppsala, 1918), p. 9.
Cf. Smith, Hippocratic Tradition, p. 222; Edelstein, RE, supp. vol. 6, col. 1305.2.
32 Herzog, p. 215. Smith (Pseud, p. 6) cautiously follows Herzog's use of Erotian to place the
two speeches in Alexandria at the last quarter of the third century. For the Speech from the Altar
(Epibomios), see Smith, Pseud, pp. 4-5; text and Eng. trans., pp. 108-109.
33 Smith, Pseud, p. 8.
34 Smith, Pseud, pp. 8-9.
35 See, e.g., M.N. Tod, Greek Historical Inscriptions, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1946, 1948), vol. 2,
no. 97; cf. Herzog, Koische Forsch., p. 215, n. 2.
in the legend in De re rustica 1.4.5. Not until the first century A.D., however, is the
Embassy actually attested by name.42
By the first century B.C. the story of Hippocrates and the plague was well
known among the Romans. Varro's allusion to the legend occurs in a discussion
about the risk in buying a farm that is unwholesome due to a miasma from the land
or water or that is too hot or that is affected by unhealthy winds. Varro's speaker,
Gnaeus Tremelius Scrofa, claims that these drawbacks can be corrected by
knowledge and the outlay of money. He stresses that attention must be given to the
orientation of the buildings on their sites. Then he asks rhetorically, "Did not that
famous physician, Hippocrates, during a great pestilence save not one farm but
many cities by his skill?"43
In the first century A.D. Pliny included in his Natural History 7.37 a list of
physicians who had been honored for their extraordinary skill. Hippocrates heads
the list:
.. .in medicine Hippocrates, who foretold a plague that was coming from Illyria and
dispatched his pupils round the cities to render assistance, in return for which services
Greece voted him the honors that it gave to Hercules.44
Fire even by itself has a curative power. It is well established that epidemics caused by
an eclipse of the sun are alleviated in many ways by the lighting of bonfires. Empedocles
and Hippocrates have proved this in various passages of their writings.46
Pliny's passage marks a new direction in the legend; this is the first extant
evidence that Hippocrates used fire to fight the epidemic. Also significant is Pliny's
having Hippocrates share the credit for this fire cure with Empedocles, the famous
pre-Socratic philosopher of the fifth century B.C. Unfortunately, none of these
writings of Empedocles or Hippocrates has been found. There probably were none.
How then did Hippocrates become mixed up with this strange medical procedure-
and with Empedocles? Before we can suggest an answer, we must move ahead to
the early second century A.D. when Plutarch wrote an essay on Isis and Osiris. In
speaking of the Egyptian habit of burning incense, Plutarch mentioned how fires
were used by physicians to purify the air:
Again at noon, when they perceive that the sun draws up by force from the earth a very
large and heavy exhalation and mingles it with the air, they burn incense of myrrh; for its
heat loosens and disintegrates the turbid and muddy mass which gathers in the atmosphere.
In fact doctors believe that it is helpful in treating pestilential conditions, to make a big
fire in order to rarefy the air; this is done more effectively if fragrant wood is burnt, such
as that of the cypress, juniper, and pine. Certainly Acron the doctor is said to have gained
fame at Athens during the feat plague by ordering a fire to be kindled near the sick; for he
thus benefitted not a few.4
illness was really caused by desire for his stepmother, Stratonice (Suda 2.402-403). See Chapter 3
of this study.
46 Pliny, Nat. hist. 36.69. Latin text ed. C. Mayhoff, C. Plini, 5.379; Eng. trans. Eichholz,
Pliny, 10.159: Est et ipsis ignibus medica vis. Pestilentiae quae obscuratione solis contrahitur,
ignes si fiant, multifariam auxillari certum est. Empedocles et Hippocrates id demonstravere
diversis locis.
47 Plutarch, Isis and Osiris 383 c-d. Ed., trans., comm. by J. G. Griffiths, Plutarch's De /side
et Osiride (Cambridge, 1970), pp. 244-245 (text and trans.), 566-568 (commentary). Plutarch's
source probably was Manetho, an Egyptian priest at Heliopolis, who fl. 304-246 B.C. (Griffiths,
pp. 78 and 99). Cf. Plutarch, Pericles 34, ed. C. Lindskog and K. Ziegler, Plutarchi Vitae
Paral/elae, 4 vols. in 7 fasc. (Leipzig, 1964-1980), 1 (2), 41; there Pericles' enemies are blamed
for spreading the belief among the people that an unhealthy atmosphere, from overcrowding and
summer heat, caused the epidemic. Plutarch gives no indication that any remedy or doctor was
effective in stopping or alleviating the outbreak.
Leaving aside the medical theory behind this therapy for the moment, note the
new elements. Acron of Acragas (a contemporary ofEmpedocles and from the same
city) is also associated with using fire to cure epidemics, and not epidemics in
general, but the most famous epidemic in ancient history, the so-called plague at
Athens in 430 B.C. Henceforth, in the later accounts of Hippocrates and the plague,
such as those by Galen, Oribasius, Aetius, and extending all the way to the
seventeenth century, as we have seen, the epidemic Hippocrates "cured" was
identified with the plague at Athens in 430 B.C.
At this point we can ask the questions, how did Hippocrates, Empedocles, and
Acron become associated with the epidemic at Athens in 430 B.C. and how were
they credited with burning bonfires to combat it? The Embassy, Decree, Pliny's
report in Natural History 36.69, and Plutarch's in Isis and Osiris show several
important features of ancient biographical reports that can help to elucidate the
development of both the Hellenistic and the later legend involving Hippocrates and
epidemic outbreaks: the tendency to blur the line between fact and fiction;48 to
establish connections between famous men, or in this case, between a famous man
(Hippocrates), a famous city (Athens), and a famous disease (the outbreak at
Athens in 430 B.C.); 49 to interpret "contemporary" very loosely; 50 and to infer
details of a biographical report from an author's works. 51 Underlying the first three
tendencies was a desire for symmetry and a belief that eikos ("probability") was
adequate historical reasoning.52
Hippocrates' involvement with the epidemic at Athens could be considered
analogous to the meetings and teacher-student relationships that ancient biographers
constructed to establish ties between famous men. That Hippocrates was only thirty
years old, according to the chronology of the VHSS when the epidemic struck in
430 B.C., too young to have won the great reputation that he is accorded in the
tradition or to have grown sons and a son-in-law,53 did not hinder this process of
48 For a recent survey of the types of fiction in ancient biography, see J.A. Fairweather,
"Fiction in the Biographies of Ancient Writers," Ancient Society 5 (1974) 231-275. See also A.
Momigliano, The Development of Greek Biography (Cambridge, Mass., 1971), pp. 46, 47, 60;
M.R. Lefkowitz, "The Poet as Hero: Fifth-century Autobiography and Subsequent Biographical
Fiction," CQ 28 (1978) 459-469. Lefkowitz, The Lives of the Greek Poets (Baltimore, 1981), p.
viii, takes the position that "virtually all the material in all the lives is fiction;" see pp. 19, 20,
88, 92-93 for examples.
49 Fairweather, Ancient Society 5 (1974), pp. 256-261; Lefkowitz, "The Quarrel Between
Callimachus and Apollonius," ZPE 40 (1980) 8, 14; Lefkowitz, Lives, pp. 64-65, 125, 131-132.
50 Fairweather, Ancient Society 5 (1974), p. 248; Lefkowitz, ZPE 40 (1980), p. 8, Lives, pp.
64-65, 125.
5l See Momigliano, Greek Biography, p. 70; Lefkowitz, "Fictions in Literary Biography,"
Arethusa 9 (1976) 181-189, and Lefkowitz, Lives, pp. viii-ix, 83-84, 88, 102, 120--121.
52 Lefkowitz, CQ 28 (1978), p. 465.
53 Littre 1.41.
54 For Plato, see Fairweather, Ancient Society 5 (1980), p. 248; for Hennesianax, see
Lefkowitz, ZJ'E 40 (1980), p. 8, Lives, p. 125; for Herodotus, see Histories 1.30.
55 Greek text, Pseud, p. 118, 11. 7-10: o 6e epomiow 1t0lTJOllµEVoc; OlCO\O(l\ 'tWEc; EV µepEl
a
lC\Vc;TJO\Ec; y{vovtm lC(lt(X tE lCllUµata lC(l\ aveµouc; lC(l\ axi..uac; lC(l\ "CClA.A.a 1t£1p\)1CE ii~iac; lC\VElV
1tllftCX tO 1Ca8EOtTJ1COc;.
6 Hippocrates, Airs, Waters, Places 1. Greek text ed. Littre 2.12; reedited by H. Diller, CMG I
1,2, p. 24; Greek text with Eng. trans. W.H.S. Jones (vols.1-2, 4), E.T. Withington (vol. 3), P.
Potter (vols. 5--6) Hippocrates, 6 vols. (Cambridge, Mass., London, 1923-1988), 1.71.
57 Hippocrates, Airs Waters, Places 2.20-21. Littre 2.14; Diller, CMG I 1,2, p. 26; Jones,
Hippocrates, 1.73.
The chief difference between this Hellenistic legend and the later one first
evidenced by Pliny centers on what treatment Hippocrates actually used to stop the
epidemic. In the Embassy Thessalus states only that Hippocrates "gave Dracon
therapeutic instructions different from those that he himself was using."5 8 This
silence of the Hellenistic legend about how Hippocrates fought the epidemic was,
perhaps, the greatest impetus to the development of a report about his medical
technique, since ancient biographers had a tendency to generate biographical
incidents from the writings of famous men, particularly to "explain" undetailed,
general statements. 59
I suggest that all the elements were present by Pliny's time for the development,
through the processes of ancient biographical fiction, of the story that Hippocrates,
Empedocles, and Acron responded to the epidemic at Athens by building fires.
Hippocrates, who was said to have lived in the fifth century B.C., was reported to
have stopped an epidemic. The most famous epidemic of the age was the epidemic
at Athens in 430 B.C., as described by Thucydides. Acron and Empedocles, Pliny
reported elsewhere, were associated with founding the Empiric medical sect in
Sicily. 60 Hippocrates was considered an Empiric, at least by the Empirics.6 1 The
writer of the Hippocratic treatise Ancient Medicine mentioned Empedocles.62 The
ancient biographical impetus to connect famous men may have linked Hippocrates,
Acron, and Empedocles even at this early date. Much later there is, of course, the
notice in the tenth-century Suda that Acron "lectured in Athens together with
Empedocles, who is then older than Hippocrates."63 As for the tradition that
Empedocles was a physician, Empedocles' own statement in the Katharmoi
provided one hint. 64 Diogenes Laertius stated: "Heraclides [of Pontus, fourth
century B.C.] called him both a physician and seer, inferring both from these lines
5 8 Greek text, Pseud, p. 118, 11. 19-20; In my translation here I have followed the text of
Littre, 9.418, 420, who added an ou ("not"), so that the whole sentence read: "He [Hippocrates]
ordered my brother, Dracon, to sail to the Hellespont, starting from Pagasae in Thessaly, and gave
him therapeutic instructions different from [literally: "not comparable to"] those that he himself
was using; for not all regions produce the same diseases, since the atmospheric conditions are not
ou
the same all over." Littre's added makes Hippocrates' directions to Dracon accord better with the
relativistic principle of Hippocratic medicine that follows.
59 Lefkowitz, Lives, p. 122.
60 Pliny, Nat. hist. 29.1.5: alia factio ab experimentis cognominans empiricen coepit in
Sicilia, Acrone Agragantino Empedoclis physicii auctoritate commendato.
61 See Smith, Tradition, pp. 205-212, for a sketch of the Empirics' use of Hippocratic
writings to confirm their position in their polemic with their rival medical sect, the Dogmatists.
For Galen's solid testimony, see Smith, pp. 76, 79, nn. 13 and 14, and p. 165. Also see Smith,
pp. 96, 178, 182, and 224.
62 Hippocrates, Ancient Medicine 20. Greek text ed. A.I. Festugiere, Hippocrate: L' Ancienne
Medecine (Paris, 1948; rptd. New York, 1979), p. 17; Eng. trans. Jones, Hippocrates, 1.53.
63 Suda 1.94. But cf. M. Wellmann, Die Fragmente der sikelischen Arzte Akron, Philistion
und des Diokles von Karystos (Berlin, 1901), pp. 108-109.
64 M.R. Wright, Empedocles: The Extant Fragments (New Haven, 1981), p. 20. Wright
suggests that the tradition may also have developed from "the influence that his work had on
subsequent medical theory," the anecdotes about him, and Ancient Medicine's attack on him. For
Wright's evaluation ofEmpedocles as a healer, see pp. 9-14.
65 Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Philosophers (henceforth DL) 8.61. Cf. Empedocles,
Fragment B 112, ed. H. Diels, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (hereafter DK), 6th ed., ed. W.
Krantz, 3 vols. (Berlin, 1960--1961), 1.354----355.
66 Celsus, De medicina, Prooemium 7-8. Ed. F. Marx, A. Corne/ii Celsi quae supersunt
(Corpus Medicorum Latinorum I) (Leipzig, 1915), p. 18: scilicet iis bane maxime requirentibus,
qui corporum suorum robora quieta cogitatione nocturnaque vigilia minuerant. Ideoque multos ex
sapientiae professoribus peritos eius fuisse accipimus, clarissimos vero ex iis Pythagoran et
Empedoclen et Democratium. Eng. trans. by W.G. Spencer, Celsus: De medicina, 3 vols.
(Cambridge, Mass., 1935-1938), 1.5.
67 E.g., Diseases of Women, Book 1,11 (Littre 8.44, 46); Diseases of Women, Book 2, 134
(Littre 8.302), and Diseases 3 (Littre 7.130). See Rubin, "Biographical Fiction," pp. 119-120, n.
76.
68 Empedocles, Fragment B38, DK 1.329. See Wright, Empedoc/es, p. 197. For Empedocles'
four elements in Greek medicine, see pp. 26-27.
69 DL 8.70. For an evaluation of this legend, see Wright, Empedocles, p. 12.
late second century, after A.D. 198, or in the first years of the third century A.D. 78
Hippocrates and his fire cure enter Theriac to Piso in Chapter sixteen, a discussion
of how galene, the multi-ingredient antidote, could counteract the disease-laden air
that a person would unavoidably inhale during epidemic-causing conditions. 7 9
Galene, a compound drug that contained some sixty-four ingredients, included the
flesh of various poisonous snakes (kerastes, echidna, aspis), pitch or bitumen,
castoreum, honey, wine, and the "juice" of the opium poppy. 80 Andromachus the
Elder, personal physician to the Emperor Nero (A.D. 54--68), had developed galene
from an earlier multi-ingredient antidote against poisons concocted by Mithridates
VI of Pontus (c. 12~3 B.C.). 81 It had many more uses than as an antidote against
poisons or as a remedy for the bites of venomous animals. Galene was equally
handy against lingering headaches, deafness, poor sight, kidney stones, ulcers, and
dysentery. It could also bring on the menses and dry up excesses of humors in the
body. 82
since it has been established rather well that Galen lived beyond A.D. 210, perhaps later than 213
(V. Nutton, "Galen in the Eyes of his Contemporaries," BHM 58 (1984) 324). For this reason,
while acknowledging that the question requires further study, I refer to Theriac to Pisa's author as
Galen.
78 From Galen's statement in Theriac to Pisa 2 (K 14.216-217), he was personally acquainted
with the Emperor Marcus Aurelius (A.D. 161-180). Also in this chapter Galen praises the
generosity of trov vuv µeyfotcov cx-iitoicpcxtopcov (K 14.217), who could be Severus and Caracalla,
for sharing galenewith Antipater when he was suffering from a painful kidney disease (K 14.218).
Antipater A!\lius, born in Phrygian Hieropolis (died c. A.D. 212), was the rhetorical master of
Septimius Severus' sons, Caracalla and Geta, and in charge of Greek letters under Severus. See H.-
G. Pflaum, Les Carrieres Procuratoriennes Equestres sous le Haut-Empire Romain, 3 vols. (Paris,
1960--1961), 2.610-612 (=No. 230). Nutton, Med. Hist. 27 (1983), p. 6, n. 21, dates Theriac to
Pisa between A.D. 198 and 212.
79 This use of galene to fight an epidemic had already been mentioned by its inventor, the
physician, Andromachus, in his elegiac poem on galene, addressed to Nero. Galen quotes it in
Antidotes 1.6 (K 14.35), as he does in Theriac to Pisa (K 14.233): "A drink of galene served up at
dawn heals noxious epidemics and all air not fit to breathe."
80 The recipe is given three times in Theriac to Piso-in Andromachus' poem (Chap. 6
=Galen, Antidotes 1.6), in his son's prose version (Chap. ?=Antidotes 1.7), and in Chapter 12. In
each the order of ingredients differs. Watson, Theriac and Mithridatium:a Study in Therapeutics
(London, 1966), pp. 45, 79, counts sixty-four ingredients; on p. 49, n. 4, however, he states that
"excluding honey the ingredients number 64 in Antidotes 1. . .in Theriake (Ch. 12) there are 63."
My count agreed-sixty-four ingredients, including honey, in the list of Andromachus the younger
and sixty-three items in Theriac to Pisa.
81 See G. Watson, Theriac, pp. 33-93, for a consideration of Mithridatium and galene.
Andromachus the Elder was personal physician to Nero (A.D. 54-68) and should not be confused
with his son, Andromachus the Younger, who also practiced medicine in the same period. Galen
makes this distinction clear (Antidotes 1.1, K 14.42: Tcxutcx µev o 1tpEcr~UtEpoc; 'AvSpoµaxoc;
eypmvev). C. Fabricius, Ga/ens Exzerpte aus iilteren Pharmakologen (Berlin, 1972), p. 201, with
refs.
82 Theriac to Pisa 15 (K 14.270--277).
And it appeared to us that this antidote84 [ga/ene] in fact would be effective by itself in
helping those afflicted during epidemic conditions, there being in this way no other
remedy to fight against the magnitude of the evil. For just like some beast, an epidemic
itself also destroys not some few men, but spreading over whole cities, destroys them
utterly; and this happens when in some wretched manner the air becomes capable of
corrupting and because men, due to the necessity of breathing, are not able to escape the
terror but draw the air into themselves just like some poison taken by mouth.
On this account I also commend Hippocrates, who deserves great admiration for curing
the famous epidemic that first came to the Greeks from Ethiopia, merely by altering the
air so that it would no longer be inhaled in the same condition. He ordered fire to be
kindled throughout the whole city, not simply composed of kindling wood, but also of
the sweetest garlands and flowers. These, he advised, were to be the fire's fuel, and he
urged the richest of sweet-scented unguents to be burned so that men might inhale for
relief the air thus purified.
In the same way I believe that galene, since it is like a cleansing fire itself, allows
those who have drunk it ahead of time not to be wholly seized by the evil, while it is able
to cure completely those already suffering [from the epidemic]. Galene accomplishes this
by altering and turning about the harmfulness of the inhaled air and no longer allowing it
to corrupt the body's constitution.85
84 Watson, Theriac, pp. 4-5 distinguishes between an antidote, designed to counteract poisons,
and a theriac, a specific type of antidote intended to act against the bites of venemous snakes,
spiders, scorpions, and insects, as well as those of rabid dogs. Theriac to Piso does not make such
a nice distinction. In this passage, for instance, Andromachus' compound, galene, is referred to,
first, as an &.v1:t601:oi; (K 14.280), then as a 8Tipia1cr1 (K 14.282).
85 Theriac to Piso 16 (K 14.280-281).
86 Plutarch, Isis and Osiris 383 C, ed. Griffith, De /side, p. 78: A.mruVEt 6e ~EA'ttOV, £WI £'1)(1)611
~uA.a. 1Ca.icoow, ota.1C'l)1ta.pinou 1Ca.l a.p1Ceu8ou Ka.l 1tru1CT1i;, Galen, Theriac to Piso 16 (K 14.281):
to
1C£A,£U(l(li; O~V &.vex nJV ltOA.tv <>A.11V £~Cllt't£tl0a.t ,rup, oux <XltA.TIV ,:fii; llVCl'lfEmi; nJV 'UA.TlV £XOV,
I immediately attempted in every way to dry out as many people as I saw were moist,
while I maintained the original state in those who were more dry by nature. I treated with
purges as many bodies as I found were full of impurities, while I opened and cleansed
blocked passages. In a word, I kept people healthy by applying opposites, and sometimes
used cooling techniques, if this should be the case, and sometimes heating. And by
kindling a great fire one should be able to turn the air hot and dry as it is becoming moist
and cold, just as they say Hippocrates did among the Athenians and also Acron of
Acragas. 89
a'JJJJ. c:m:q,a.vcov 'tE KCll 'tOOV av8rov 't(X E\lCOOE<J't(l't(l, 'tOtClU'tCl c:rovE~OUA.t<JEV dvm 'tOU m>poc; 'tT\V
'tf)OIPTJV, Kill £'/tt<JltEUOEW cxiitqi 'tOOV µupcov 't<X A.uta.pCtYCa.'ta., 1ea.t 116eia.v 'tl'IV oOµTJV ~OV't(l...
87 For a detailed analysis of the relation of these texts, see J. Rubin Pinault, JHMAS 41(1986),
pp. 53-56.
88 Aetius, Tetrabibloi 5.95. Ed. A. Olivieri, Aetii Amideni Libri medicinales, CMG VIII 2
(Berlin, 1950), pp. 81-82.
89 Aetius, 5.95, ed. A. Olivieri, Aetii Amideni, pp. 81-82.
90 Aetius, Tetrabibloi 5.95, ed. Olivieri, Aetii Amideni, p. 82; Oribasius, Synopsis ad
Eustathium 6.24, ed. J. Raeder, Oribasii collectionum medicarum reliquiae, 5 vols., CMG VI
(Leipzig, 1926-33), 3.199=0ribasius, Libri ad Eunapium 3.1, in CMG VI, 3.397.
stating his medical strategy as the use of opposites, Aetius brings the chapter on
epidemic diseases to a dramatic close by speculating that it might be possible to
counteract a cold, moist epidemic atmosphere by kindling a fire to warm and dry the
air. Such a technique would, of course, constitute a method of treatment by
opposites, since the hot, dry properties of fire would neutralize the cold, moist
properties of the air. That such a procedure is purely theoretical to Aetius, indicated
by his use of the optative case, 6uvcmo ("one should be able"), does not daunt
him. In fact, such is Aetius' zeal for theoretical consistency, that here at the end of
his chapter on epidemic diseases he has apparently forgotten his addition of a
statement to Oribasius' text, to the effect that excessively moist and hot air causes
epidemics. 91 That addition is very similar to a sentence in Galen's Differences
Among Fevers, giving as an example of such an epidemic the very same outbreak at
Athens.9 2 Despite this serious inconsistency, Aetius had gone further than his
source, Oribasius, in reconciling the theory of opposites with the use of fire to
counteract epidemics. Aetius has also added Hippocrates as an authority for this
theoretical procedure to Oribasius' sentence, which named only Acron.93
Thus medical theorizing about both antidotes and the established medical theory
that "opposites cure" helped to shape and perpetuate the story that Hippocrates
stopped epidemics with fire. But these were not the only medical theories to inform
the story. The belief that miasma or "bad" air caused epidemics also contributed to
the positive reception accorded the legend in antiquity and beyond..
Ancient theorizing about the cause and spread of epidemic disease focused on
common environmental factors, such as the water and air. In a number of
Hippocratic writings, air and wind play an importaat role in causing and carrying
such diseases. For example, Breaths attributes epidemic disease to a corruption of
the atmosphere:
there are two kinds of fevers; one is epidemic, called pestilence, the other is sporadic,
attacking those who follow a bad regimen. Both of these fevers, however, are caused by
air ... So whenever the air has been infected with such pollutions as are hostile to the
human race, then men fall sick...94
91 Aetius 5.95, ed. Olivieri, Aetii Amideni, p. 81: Sometimes, when the air surrounding us
becomes too moist and warm, it can bring about condictions conducive to epidemics."( fon 6e 01:e
uycrepor;; 1ccxt 0epµo,;epor;;, 0 ltEP1£X(l)V fiµ&q, 001py1:yv6µevoq, AOtµcootl lCCl.'tOO'tCXOW q>epet.)
2 Galen, De febrium differentiis 1.6 (K 7.290): "And sometimes the excessive heat of the
surrounding air starts it [an epidemic], as in the case of the epidemic that attacked the Athenians,
just as Thucydides says."(fon 6' O'tE lCCl.'t<XPXEt µev aµe,:poq, 0epµa.aia. 'tOU ltEpt£XOV'tO',, c'or;; mt 'tOU
lCCl.'tCt.A.a.Pov,:or;; 'A!hiva.{our;; AOtµou, 1Ca.86. q,TIOW o0ou1ru6{6Jtr;;. ) For other examples of Aetius'
insertions from Galen's Differences Among Fevers in Tetrab. 5.95, see Pinault, JHMAS 41
(1986), p. 55, n. 8. These interpolations have not, to the best of my knowledge, been recorded.
93 Oribasius, Synopsis ad Eustathium 6.24, ed. Raeder, CMG VI, vol. 3.199: JCa.t ,rupav 6e
nr;; UVCl.lCCI.WV ltOA.Afl OOVa.t'tO &v µe,:a.Pa.A.Eiv £m 'tO 0epµov JCa.t 91pov 'tOV a.epa. 'tE(l)', {yypov OV'tCt.,
Ka.06.itep itoti\aa.{ ipa.ow "AKprova. 1:ov 'A1epa.ya.vnvov.
94 Hippocrates, Breaths 6 (Littre 6.96, 98; Eng. trans. Jones, Hippocrates, 2.233, 235). Cf. On
the Nature of Man 9, ed. J. Jouanna, Hippocrate, La Nature de /'Homme, CMG I 1.3( Berlin,
1975), p. 190; Eng. trans. Jones, Hippocrates, 4.27, which seems to identify the pathogenic
First I have shown before that there are seeds of many things which are helpful to our
life, and on the other hand it must needs be that many fly about which cause disease and
death. And when by chance they have happened to gather and distemper the sky, then the
air becomes full of disease.95
As a result of heavy rains in the previous winter the ground had become soaked with
water, and many low-lying regions, having received a vast amount of water, turned into
shallow pools and held stagnant water, very much as marshy regions do; and when these
waters became warm in the summer and grew putrid, thick foul vapours were formed,
which, rising up in fumes, corrupted the surrounding air, the very thing which may be
seen taking place in marshy grounds which are by nature pestilential.96
For they say that a plague usually occurs after a great earthquake, and this is not
surprising. For many death-carrying elements lie hidden in the depths. The very
element in the air as an a.1t61eptatc; ("unhealthy exhalation"). Cf. Nutton, Med. Hist. 27 (1983), p.
13.
95 Lucretius, De rerum natura 6.1093-1097, ed. and trans. C. Bailey, De rerum natura, 3 vols.
(Oxford, 1947), 1.570-571. See Nutton, Med. Hist. 27 (1983), pp. 9-10.
96 Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca historica 12.58.3, ed. M. Casevitz, Bibliotheque historique
(Paris, 1972), p. 61; Eng. trans. by C.H. Oldfather, C.L. Sherman, C.B. Wells, R.M. Geer,
F.R.Walton, Diodorus of Sicily, 12 vols. (Cambridge, Mass., 1933-1967), 5.47. Since
Thucydides was silent about the causes in his contemporary, fifth-century B.C. account, it is
unlikely that Ephorus over a century later had any new evidence. More likely, his "causes" of the
Athenian epidemic were explanations after the fact, as Gomme submits, in A.W. Gomme et al., A
Historical Commentary on Thucydides, 5 vols. (Oxford, 1956--1981), 2.149. The notion that a
warm, moist atmosphere caused epidemics, whether first formulated by Ephorus or added by
Diodorus, anticipated later statements in Galen (e.g., Defebrium differentiis l .6, K 7 .290) and was
probably developed from hints in the Hippocratic Epidemics, especially Epidemics 2.1 (Littre
5.72) and Epidemics 3 (Littre 3.66, 68). Cf. H. Gibaltus' commentary on Galen, De febrium
differentiis, in Cl. Galeni Pergameni libros defebribus commentarius (Lyons, 1561), p. 110.
97 Seneca, Natura/es quaestiones 6.27. Ed. P. Oltramare, Seneque questions naturelles, 2 vols.
(Paris, 1929), 2.284; Eng. trans. T.H. Corcoran, Natura/es quaestiones, 2 vols. (Cambridge,
Mass., 1971-1972), 2.205.
98 Pliny, Nat. Hist. 7.37. Smith, Tradition, p. 219.
99 R. Laux, Ars medicinae: einfriihmittelalterliches Kompendium der Medizin (Leipzig, 1930),
p. 419 (=Kyklos, vol. 3).
lOO I. Actuarius, De methodo medendi 5.6. Trans. H. Mathisius, De methodo medendi libri 6
(Venice, 1554), p. 202.
101 R.J. Palmer, "The Control of Plague in Venice and Northern Italy, 1348-1600," (Ph.D.
diss. U. Kent, 1978), p. 13.
102 M.W. Dols, The Black Death in the Middle East (Princeton, 1977), p. 97.
103 G. Fracastoro, De contagione et contagiosis morbis et eorum curatione 3.7. Trans. W.C.
Wright, Hieronymi Fracastorii De Contagione ... (New York, 1930), p. 239. See Palmer, The
Control of Plague," pp. 96-97.
104 See Chapters 3 and 4 of this study.
Arabic compilations of anecdotes and sayings of wise men. 105 The story about
Hippocrates' use of fire, however, did not pass into this ethical-biographical
tradition but became firmly attached to therapeutic passages on epidemics and, later,
the bubonic plague. It was Galen, again, who set this Hippocratic legend on a
different path from those involving Artaxerxes and Perdiccas. In Theriac to Piso he
described how Hippocrates ordered the Athenians to kindle fires throughout the city
and to burn sweet-smelling unguents and wreaths to purify the air. The detail of the
directions and the story's context-in a pharmaceutical book-probably determined
the legend's destiny. Readers were more interested in recreating Hippocrates'
"plague-repellent" than in contemplating his altruism. Also, such was the authority
of Galen that his separation of the legends became canonical to succeeding
generations of physicians. The story about Hippocrates' use of fire to combat the
epidemic at Athens was included in Byzantine medical compilations, such as those
by Aetius and Actuarius. The Islamic tradition contains traces of the story, also in a
therapeutic context. In the West the story resurfaced again and again, well past the
Renaissance, surviving so long as the belief persisted that "bad" air caused plague
and that a physician could prevent or stop outbreaks by fumigating the atmosphere
with fire.
105 Galen, Quod optimus medicus sit quoque philosophus 3. See Chapters 5 to 7 of this study.