0% found this document useful (0 votes)
73 views24 pages

Shinya Yamanaka and iPS Cell Advances

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can be generated from adult somatic cells by introducing genes associated with pluripotency, allowing researchers to obtain pluripotent cells without using embryos. iPS cells have properties similar to embryonic stem cells and can differentiate into various cell types. This technique was pioneered in 2006 by Shinya Yamanaka's team and provided an important alternative to human embryonic stem cells for research and potential therapies.

Uploaded by

rihamazim2018
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
73 views24 pages

Shinya Yamanaka and iPS Cell Advances

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can be generated from adult somatic cells by introducing genes associated with pluripotency, allowing researchers to obtain pluripotent cells without using embryos. iPS cells have properties similar to embryonic stem cells and can differentiate into various cell types. This technique was pioneered in 2006 by Shinya Yamanaka's team and provided an important alternative to human embryonic stem cells for research and potential therapies.

Uploaded by

rihamazim2018
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

31.10.

2023

Types of stem cells:

3)Induced pluripotent (iPS)


stem cells

Induced pluripotent (iPS) stem cells

• The «deprogrammed «» cells are known as induced pluripotent stem


(iPS) cells because, in using this fairly simple laboratory technique to
return them to their undifferentiasted state (pluripotency) and could
do everything ES cells can do.

1
31.10.2023

Why IPS Cells?

ES cells do not match


the donor’s genetic makeup for therapeutic purposes

Historical Timeline Showing Events That Led To The Development Of IPS Cells

2
31.10.2023

Somatic-derived stem cells via nuclear transfer

Nucleus
directed differentiation

Fibroblasts from Enucleated


ES cell Progenitor Neuron
patients oocyte

• Create ES cells that match the donor’s genetic makeup for therapeutic purposes.
• ES cells derived from patients can be directed to differentiate into specific lineages (e.g.
dopaminergic neurons) to study a particular disease (e.g. Parkinson’s disease).
• This method may be used for cell-based therapies that would circumvent immune rejection.

Somatic cells can turn into embryonic state

(Prof Shinya Yamaka)

3
31.10.2023

Dr. Shinya Yamanaka, PhD

Dr. Kazutoshi Takahashi, PhD


Human iPSCs

Production of iPS cells

directed
iPS reprogramming differentiation
factors

ectodermal cell brain

iPS cell mesodermal cell heart


fibroblasts from
patients

endodermal cell
pancreas
8

4
31.10.2023

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells)


‘genetic reprogramming’
= add certain genes to the cell

cell from the body induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell


behaves like an embryonic stem cell

differentiation

culture iPS cells in the lab

all possible types of


Advantage: no need for embryos! specialized cells

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells)


genetic reprogramming
cell from the body (skin) pluripotent stem cell
(iPS)

differentiation

5
31.10.2023

iPS cells - a recent advance

• IPS cells were first produced in 2006 from mouse tissue, and in 2007 from human.

• This is an groundbreaking advance in stem cell research, because it allows researchers


to obtain pluripotent stem cells, which are important in research and potentially
have therapeutic uses, without the controversial use of embryos.

• Reprogramming adult cells to obtain iPS cells may pose significant risks that could limit
their use in humans. If viruses are used to alter the cells’ genome, the expression of
cancer-causing genes or oncogenes may potentially be triggered after these cells are
introduced into animals.
11

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells)

• A type of pluripotent stem cell artificially derived from an adult somatic


cell by "forcing" expression of specific genes.

• iPS cells are believed to be similar to ES cells with respect to:


• stem cell gene and protein expression
• ability to differentiate into all lineages in vitro
• forming viable chimeras after injection into blastocysts or tumors
when transplanted into adult tissues
• potential to form an entire organism, such as a mouse
12

6
31.10.2023

Alternatives to hES Cells

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS Cells)

• Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPS)


• Uses Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc genes
• Show higher potency than cord cells
• Low efficiency (recent improvements)
• Other problems
• Abnormal aging
• Tumor production
• Incomplete reprogramming

7
31.10.2023

First Generation
• First generated by Shinya Yamanaka’s team at Kyoto University, Japan
in 2006.
• Four key pluripotency genes essential for the production of
pluripotent stem cells were used; Oct-3/4, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4
• Retroviruses were used to transfect Mouse fibrblasts.

Pluripotency Factors
• C-Myc, Oct ¾ and SOX2 promote self-renewal and drive proliferation
in pluripotent cells.

• Sox2: Essential for embryonic development. Down regulation of this


factor leads to differentiation of ES and IPS cells.

8
31.10.2023

Limitations

• This IPSCs showed methylation errors compared to original patterns


in ESC lines and failed to produce viable chimeras if injected into
developing embryoes.

Second Generation
• In June 2007, by the same group.

• These cell lines were also derived from mouse fibroblast by retroviral mediated
reactivation of the four endogenous pluripotent factors, but instead of Fbx15, they
used Nanog which is an important gene in ESCs.

• DNA methylation patterns and producing viable chimeras (and thereby contributing
to subsequent germ-line production) indicated that Nanog is a major determinant of
cellular pluripotency.

• Nanog: In embronic stem cells, Nanog, along with Oct-3/4 and Sox2, is necessary in
promoting pluripotency.

9
31.10.2023

Limitations
• One of the four genes used (namely, c-Myc) is oncogenic, and 20% of
the chimeric mice developed cancer.

• (In a later study, Yamanaka reported that one can create iPSCs even
without c-Myc, although process takes londer and is not as efficient,
but he resulting chimeras did not develop cancer).

Complications
• Because of viral transfection systems, the created cells might be prone to
form tumors.
• However Konrad Hochedlinger and his Harward University research team
successfully used an adenovirus to transport the requisite four genes into
the DNA of skin and liver cells of mice.

• Since the adenovirus does not combine any of its own genes with the
targeted host, the danger of creating tumors is eliminated.

10
31.10.2023

Delivery Methods of iPSC Induction

11
31.10.2023

Alternative to “Therapeutic” cloning

transplantation

differentiated donor cells

embryonic stem cells

early embryo

egg
? skin cells

nucleus

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells

transplantation

differentiated donor cells

iPS cells

blastocyst Oct4
Klf4 Sox2
c-Myc

enucleated oocyte
? adult cells

nucleus

12
31.10.2023

Gene repair in iPS cells

transplantation

differentiated donor cells

repaired iPS cells


by CHRISPER
gene targeting

Oct4
iPS cells
Klf4 Sox2
c-Myc
adult cells

Applications of IPS cells

13
31.10.2023

Regenerative Medicine Using IPS Cells


fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbbbbbbbbf

Regenerative Medicine Using IPS Cells

• Neurons - Parkinson’s Disease


• Retinal/Corneal Cells - Eye Diseases
• Heart Muscle Cells - Heart Diseases
• Neural Stem Cells - Spinal Cord Injury
• Platelets - Blood Transfusion
• Immune Cells - Cancer
• Cartilage - Arthritic Disorder

14
31.10.2023

Drug Development Using IPS cells

• Disease Modeling with Organoids


• Drug Discovery Applications

15
31.10.2023

Clinical Trails of IPS Cells


RPE: Retinal pigment epithelium
AMD: Age-related Macular degeneration
(World’s first operation with IPS cells)

http://msemporda.blogspot.com/p/rik-ip.html

16
31.10.2023

Clinical Trails of IPS Cells


RPE: Retinal pigment epithelium
AMD: Age-related Macular degeneration
(World’s first operation with IPS cells)

17
31.10.2023

•Print

Clinical Trails of IPS Cells


• A clinical trial to treat Parkinson’s disease patients with human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.
• The studies will involve transplanting nerve cells produced by human iPS cells into the brains of
Parkinson’s disease patients. The trial is Japan’s third case of transplanting iPS cells into humans in a
clinical setting, following treatments for eye and heart disease patients.

July 30, 2018

http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201807300029.html

18
31.10.2023

Genome analysis for one patient was half million US dollars (for first clinical trial)

19
31.10.2023

Allogenic Cell Therapy with IPS cells

• Instead of each individual, healthy volunteers


• Allogenic transplantation – immune rejection problem
• Match HLA
• Super donors – IPS cell stocks

20
31.10.2023

21
31.10.2023

22
31.10.2023

Limitations of IPS cells


➢ iPS cells are not identical to human embryonic stem (hES)
iPS cell morphology, proliferation, surface antigens, gene expression, telomerase
activity, and the epigenetic status of pluripotent cell-specific genes are similar to
the same characteristics in embryonic stem cells but not identical.

➢There are even differences between IPS cells derived from the same patient.
human cells as DNA microarray analysis detected differences between the two
pluripotent stem cell lines (Takahashi et al. 2007); and (iii) iPS cells are derived
from somatic cells such as fibroblasts and peripheral blood cells.

23
31.10.2023

Limitations of IPS cells

❖Uncertainty about the functional equivalence to hES


Due to the lack of long-term follow-up studies;
❖the risk of tumourigenesis — as iPS cell teratoma formation can lead to tumour
formation
❖the risk of immunogenicity.

Technology innovations have reduced the risk of tumourigenesis (Yu et al. 2009;
Chen et al. 2011; Okita et al. 2011; Okita et al. 2013) and it was reported limited
immunogenicity of the transplanted cells differentiated from iPSCs and ES cells
(Araki et al. 2013)

24

You might also like