UNCLASSIFIED

RCS: DD-A&T(O&A)823-341

UH-60M Black Hawk Helicopter (UH-60M Black Hawk)

As of FY 2021 President's Budget

Defense Acquisition Management

Information Retrieval
(DAMIR)

UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Table of Contents

Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs 3

Program Information 5
Responsible Office 5
References 6
Mission and Description 7
Executive Summary 7
Threshold Breaches 9
Schedule 10
Performance 12
Track to Budget 14
Cost and Funding 14
Charts 24
Risks 26
Low Rate Initial Production 28
Foreign Military Sales 29
Nuclear Costs 30
Unit Cost 31
Cost Variance 34
Contracts 37
Deliveries and Expenditures 38
Operating and Support Cost 39

UNCLASSIFIED 2
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs

Acq O&M - Acquisition-Related Operations and Maintenance

ACAT - Acquisition Category
ADM - Acquisition Decision Memorandum
APB - Acquisition Program Baseline
APPN - Appropriation
APUC - Average Procurement Unit Cost
$B - Billions of Dollars
BA - Budget Authority/Budget Activity
Blk - Block
BY - Base Year
CAPE - Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
CARD - Cost Analysis Requirements Description
CDD - Capability Development Document
CLIN - Contract Line Item Number
CPD - Capability Production Document
CY - Calendar Year
DAB - Defense Acquisition Board
DAE - Defense Acquisition Executive
DAMIR - Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
DoD - Department of Defense
DSN - Defense Switched Network
EMD - Engineering and Manufacturing Development
EVM - Earned Value Management
FOC - Full Operational Capability
FMS - Foreign Military Sales
FRP - Full Rate Production
FY - Fiscal Year
FYDP - Future Years Defense Program
ICE - Independent Cost Estimate
IOC - Initial Operational Capability
Inc - Increment
JROC - Joint Requirements Oversight Council
$K - Thousands of Dollars
KPP - Key Performance Parameter
LRIP - Low Rate Initial Production
$M - Millions of Dollars
MDA - Milestone Decision Authority
MDAP - Major Defense Acquisition Program
MILCON - Military Construction
N/A - Not Applicable
O&M - Operations and Maintenance
ORD - Operational Requirements Document
OSD - Office of the Secretary of Defense
O&S - Operating and Support
PAUC - Program Acquisition Unit Cost

UNCLASSIFIED 3
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

PB - President's Budget
PE - Program Element
PEO - Program Executive Officer
PM - Program Manager
POE - Program Office Estimate
RDT&E - Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
SAR - Selected Acquisition Report
SCP - Service Cost Position
TBD - To Be Determined
TY - Then Year
UCR - Unit Cost Reporting
U.S. - United States
USD(AT&L) - Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)
USD(A&S) - Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment)

UNCLASSIFIED 4
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Program Information

Program Name
UH-60M Black Hawk Helicopter (UH-60M Black Hawk)

DoD Component
Army

Responsible Office

COL Calvin J. Lane Phone: 256-955-8938

Utility Helicopters Project Office Fax: 256-955-8109
Program Executive Office Aviation
DSN Phone: 645-8938
SFAE-AV-UH
Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5000 DSN Fax: 645-8109
Date Assigned: September 5,2019

[email protected]

UNCLASSIFIED 5
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

References

SAR Baseline (Production Estimate)

Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 31, 2005

Approved APB
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated June 20, 2011

UNCLASSIFIED 6
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Mission and Description

The UH-60M Black Hawk Helicopter (UH-60M Black Hawk) serves as the Army's utility helicopter for the near and midterm
force and is in line with the Army's Modernization Strategy, the National Military Strategy, and the National Defense Strategy.
The UH-60M Black Hawk is a digital networked platform with greater range and lift to support maneuver Commanders
through air assault, general support command and control, and aeromedical evacuation. FRP for this new-build helicopter
began in 2007. The UH-60M Black Hawk, with the integrated Medical Evacuation (MEDEVAC) Mission Equipment Package
(MEP) kit, provides day/night and adverse weather emergency evacuation of casualties. The integration of the MEDEVAC
MEP onto the UH-60M changes the nomenclature to HH-60M.

Executive Summary

Program Highlights Since Last Report

The UH-60M program requirements are stable and funding is adequate to meet cost, schedule, and performance objectives
established in the current approved APB. There are no increased risks to the UH-60M program since the last SAR.

A FY 2019 Congressional plus-up provided funding to procure eight additional UH-60M aircraft for the Army National Guard.

Proceeds from the Blackhawk Exchange and Sales Team (BEST) program were reprogrammed as FY 2016 funds in the
amount of $12.849 M, FY 2017 funds in the amount of $87.186 M, and FY 2018 funds in the amount of $83.33 M.

The UH-60M program is in FRP and remains on schedule with a total of 1,163 aircraft procured as of December 31, 2019.
Included are eight RDT&E aircraft, 1,150 Procurement( 849 UH-60M and 301 HH-60M) and five BEST Aircraft. The final UH
-60M procurement is planned for FY 2028.

A total of 1048 aircraft were accepted as of December 31, 2019 (eight RDT&E aircraft, 776 UH-60M aircraft, and 264 HH-
60M aircraft).

The first lot of the Multi-Year IX contract (Lot 41) was awarded on June 30, 2017, the second lot (Lot 42) was awarded
on November 30, 2017, and the third lot (Lot 43) was awarded on December 6, 2018. The first Multi-Year IX delivery
occurred on October 12, 2017.

There are no significant software-related issues with this program at this time.

UNCLASSIFIED 7
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

History of Significant Developments Since Program Initiation

History of Significant Developments Since Program Initiation
Date Significant Development Description
April 2001 Milestone B DAB approved entry into System Development and Demonstration.
November 2002 The UH-60M System Preliminary Design Review was held at Sikorsky in Stratford, Connecticut.
June 2003 The UH-60M System Critical Design Reviewcompleted.
September 2003 The Developmental Test Pilot Familiarization Course was completed and the first flight of UH-
60M Aircraft 1 was successfully conducted.
August 2004 Limited User Test in the Systems Integration Lab was successfully executed.
March 2005 The Milestone C ADM approved production of up to 40 LRIP aircraft and approval to award an
Advance Procurement contract for the first lot of FRP aircraft.
June 2005 An LRIP contract for the UH-60M baseline aircraft was awarded.
November 2006 Initial Operational Test & Evaluation started on October 16, 2006 and was successfully
completed four weeks ahead of schedule on November 21, 2006 with the aircraft performing well
through all missions.
June 2007 The FRP decision was achieved and the ADM signed authorizing entry into FRP for the Black
Hawk Upgrade Program to include both the UH-60M and HH-60M baseline aircraft.
December 2007 The Multi-Year VII production contract was awarded.
November 2008 The 159th Combat Aviation Brigade became the first UH-60M baseline unit deployed to a combat
zone.
February 2010 A Configuration Steering Board (CSB) held on October 15, 2009,recommended to the DAE that
the UH-60 Modernization Program restructure. The recommendation included three parts: 1)
Produce UH-60M baseline aircraft only, 2) Complete Development Testing on Fly-By-Wire
aircraft and 3) Migrate selected technologies from the Upgrade development efforts to the
baseline configuration. The recommendation was approved in theFebruary 18, 2010 DAE ADM
which directed the program to rebaseline with updates to the Acquisition Strategy and Test &
Evaluation Master Plan.
May 201 0 The Aviation Synchronization Conference Council of Colonels recommended the Army
_ Acquisition Objective increase from 1227 to 1367.
June 2011 The DAE approved the UH-60M Black Hawk APB completing the rebaseline.
July 2012 The eighth Multi-Year/Multi-Service Procurement Contract from FY 2012 through FY 2016 was
awarded. _
June 2017 The ninth Multi-Year Procurement Contract from FY 2017 through FY 2021 was awarded.

UNCLASSIFIED 8
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Threshold Breaches

APB Breaches
Explanation of Breach
Schedule
Performance The Total O&S Cost Deviation was previously reported in the
Cost RDT&E December 2013 SAR.
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
O&S Cost
Unit Cost PAUC
APUC

Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline
PAUC None
APUC None
Original UCR Baseline
PAUC None
APUC None

UNCLASSIFIED 9
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Schedule

• SA'R Baseline Current Objective • APB Objective and Threshold • Current Estimate • Current Estimate (Breach)

'01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09

UH-60M Black Hawk

Milestone B
SDD Contract Award
System PDR
System CDR
First Flight
Milestone C
LRIP Contract Award
Co u
CT Start
CT Complete
Full Rate Production IPR
FUE

IF Schedule Events

EF
SAR Baseline Current APB
Current I
Events Production Production
Estimate
Estimate Objective/Threshold
Milestone B Mar 2001 Mar 2001 Mar 2001 Mar 2001
SOD Contract Award May 2001 May 2001 May 2001 May 2001
System PDR Nov 2002 Nov 2002 Nov 2002 INov 2002
System CDR Jun 2003 Jun 2003 Jun 2003 Jun 2003
First Flight Sep 2003 Sep 2003 Sep 2003 Sep 2003
Milestone C Feb 2005 Mar 2005 Nov 2005 Mar 2005
[RIP Contract Award Mar 2005 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2005
OT Start Sep 2006 Sep 2006 Sep 2007 Oct 2006
OT Complete Nov 2006 Nov 2006 Nov 2007 Nov 2006
Full Rate Production IPR May 2007 May 2007 May 2008 May 2007
FUE Jan 2008 Jan 2008 Jan 2009 Feb 2008

Change Explanations
None

UNCLASSIFIED 10
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Acronyms and Abbreviations

CDR - Critical Design Review
FUE - First Unit Equipped
IPR - In-Process Review
OT - Operational Test
PDR - Preliminary Design Review
SDD - System Design & Development

UNCLASSIFIED 11
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Performance

Performance Characteristics
SAR Baseline Current APB
Demonstrated Current
Production Production
Performance Estimate
Estimate Ob'ective/Threshold
Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)
Interoperability (meet IERs)
All N/A N/A N/A N/A
Net-Ready
All All All Critical All All
Survivability IR Signature
NIA I Existing Existing Existing lExisting
Aircraft Survivability Equipment
N/A Existing Existing Existing Existing
Survivability Fuel Cells
N/A 14.5mm 7.62mm 7.62mm 7.62mm
Force Protection Armor Plating
NIA 114.5mm 7.62mm 7.62mm 7.62mm
External Lift
Payload
10.000 10,000 14,500 14,888 14,888
Non-KPPs
lmr.
Troop Movement
Airspeed (Sustained Cruise) (KTAS)[
" 111.1.1
175 175 145 1142.0 1145.0
One Engine Inoperative (KTAS)
_.111.11i= 1
100 100 100 ITBD 1100.0
Combat Radius (w/20 min reserve) (KM)
141111mmil l
500 500 225 225.0 1225.6
Vertical Rate of Climb (fpm)
750 750 500 725 1725
Vertical Rate of Climb w/ One Engine Inoperative (fpm)
200 200 100 TBD
Internal Lift Capability (290 lbs each)
11 11 11 11
Self-Deploy Range (nautical miles)

UNCLASSIFIED 12
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

1260 1260 1056 TBD 1071

Ballistic Protection (ground fired armor piercing (mm))
14.5 14.5 7.62 14.5 14.5
Maintainability (mhrs per flight hr)
4.6 4.6 5.4 2.3 4.1
Unscheduled mhrs per flight hr
1.3 1.3 2.1 0.4 1.1
External Lift
Vertical Rate of Climb (fpm)
500 500 200 200 200
Combat Radius (w/20 min reserve) (KM)
275 275 135 135 135

Requirements Reference
ORD dated January 29, 2007

Change Explanations
None

Acronyms and Abbreviations

fpm - feet per minute
hr - hour
IER - Information Exchange Requirement
IR - infrared
KM - kilometer
KTAS - Knots True Air Speed
lbs - pounds
mhrs - man-hours
min - minutes
mm - millimeter
w/ - with

UNCLASSIFIED 13
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Track to Budget

RDT&E

Army 2040 07 0203744A

Project - Name
504 UH-60M Recapitalization/Modifications (Sunk)
Notes
Only UH-60M Black Hawk and UH-60M Upgrade Technologies (RDT&E only) funds are included in this SAR.

Procurement

Appn
Army 2031 01 0210101A

A05002 Black Hawk UH-60M (MYP)

Army 2031 02 0210101A

AA0492 Black Hawk UH-60M Upgrade/Recap (Sunk)

Notes
The Aircraft Procurement, Army (APA) Line Item AA0492 is shared with other UH-60M Black Hawk modifications. No funds
from the AA0492 line are included in this SAR..

The APA Line Item AA0005 is the parent to the APA Line Item A05002.

Acq O&M

Army 2020 04 0702806A

Subactivity

435
Group
n a_ Name

Acquisition and Management Support:

Utility Helicopters
(Shared)

UNCLASSIFIED 14
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Cost and Funding

Cost Summary

Total Acquisition Cost

BY 2005 $M V IM VA le TY $M

ppropriation SAR Baseline Current APB SAR Baseline Current APB

Current Current
Production Production Production Production
Estimate Estimate
Estimate Objective/Threshold Estimate Objective
RDT&E 717.5 761.3 837.4 761.3 739.3 780.4 780.4
Procurement 16084.2 21873.7 24061.1 21269.2 20107.8 27314.2 26833.6
Flyaway 19991.3 25236.4
Recurring 19773.3 24983.5
Non Recurring 218.0 252.9
Support 1277.9 1597.2
Other Support 1077.3 1342.2
Initial Spares 200.6 255.0
MILCON 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 110.1 0.0 0.0 157.6
Total 16801.7 22635.0 N/A 22140.6 20847.1 28094.6 27771.6

Cost Notes

A revised POE was not completed for the UH-60M program during CY 2019. The following program risk and
mitigation were identified in the estimate:

Black Hawk Multi-Year IX Contract Quantities: Potential fluctuations in yearly aircraft procurement quantities
(dropping below 36 aircraft per year contract floor) will break the Multi-Year IX contract and increase the likelihood of
a Nunn-McCurdy breach. Breaking the Multi-Year IX contract would negatively affect Army operational readiness and
FMS.

Mitigation: The PM is working with the Army to maintain aircraft quantity commitment to those identified in the Multi-
Year IX contract.

UNCLASSIFIED 15
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

ase in
Production
Estimate
RDT&E 8 8 8
Procurement 1227 1367 1362
Total 1235 1375 1370

Quantity Notes

The H-60M APO is 1,375 aircraft and consists of 1,365 aircraft that will be sustained and 10 test aircraft that are not fielded
or sustained. Eight of the 10 test aircraft were procured with RDTE funds and two of the aircraft were procured using a
combination of APA and RDTE funding. These two aircraft were taken off the production line and upgraded with RDTE
funding resulting in a total of 1,367 procurement aircraft.

The Army Acquisition Executive approved the Blackhawk Exchange and Sales Team (BEST) program that avoids
demilitarization and divestiture costs and applies both non-appropriated funding and appropriated funding proceeds received
from the divestiture of non-excess, obsolete H-60 aircraft towards the procurement of replacement H-60M aircraft. The
authorities and policies to execute and administer the BEST program are provided in section 503, title 40, U.S. Code and
Army regulations 725-1.

A total of 13 aircraft have been procured with BEST proceeds. Five (5) of those aircraft were procured using BEST non-
appropriated funding and 8 aircraft were procured with BEST appropriated funding via a reprogramming action. The 1,367
procurement aircraft less the five (5) BEST non-appropriated funded aircraft result in the current procurement estimate of
1,362 aircraft. The 13 BEST aircraft were procured in the FYs as follows; FY 2015 two aircraft, FY2016 three aircraft,
FY2018 four aircraft and in FY2019 four aircraft.

UNCLASSIFIED 16
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Cost and Funding

Funding Summary

Appropriation Summary
FY 2021 President's Budget / December 2019 SAR (TY$ M)
To
Appropriation Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Total I
Complete
RDT&E 780.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 780.4
Procurement 18933.9 1498.1 830.4 768.6 773.5 805.0 706.1 2518.0 26833.6
MILCON 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Acq O&M 19.1 15.4 13.9 13.7 14.1 14.4 14.4 52.6 157.6
PB 2021 Total 19733.4 1513.5 844.3 782.3 787.6 819.4 720.5 2570.6 27771.6
PB 2020 Total 19668.8 1506.5 848.1 787.0 792.2 824.2 725.6 2672.6 27825.0
Delta 64.6 7.0 -3.8 -4.7 -4.6 -4.8 -5.1 -102.0 -53.4

Quantity Summary
FY 2021 President's Budget! December 2019 SAR (TY$ M)
FY FY FY FY FY FY To
Quantity Undistributed Prior Totl
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Complete
Development 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Production 0 1056 74 36 24 33 28 24 87 1362
PB 2021 Total 8 1056 74 36 24 33 28 24 87 1370
PB 2020 Total 8 1053 73 36 24 33 28 24 91 1370
Delta 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 -4 0

UNCLASSIFIED 17
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Cost and Funding

Annual Funding By Appropriation

Annual Funding
2040 I RDT&E I Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Army

Fiscal
Year

I
11.111111111
INNI-
Quantity End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
1

Recurring
Flyaway
1111Mr Ty sly!
Non End 1
Item
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
1

Total
Flyaway
111

r Total
Support
Total
Program

2000 9.5
2001 28.8
2002 55.9
2003 96.8
2004 144.8
2005 99.8
2006 106.6
2007 117.5
2008 84.9
2009 30.8
2010 5.0
Subtotal 8 780.4

UNCLASSIFIED 18
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Annual Funding
2040 I RDT&E I Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Army
BY 2005 $1V1

Fiscal Non End

Quantity End Item 1 Non
Year Item Total Total Total
Recurring Recurring
Recurring Flyaway Support Program
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
2000 10.2
2001 30.5
2002 58.6
2003 99.5
2004 145.4
2005 97.4
2006 101.3
2007 109.0
2008 77.3
2009 27.7
2010 4.4
Subtotal 8 761.3

UNCLASSIFIED 19
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Annual Funding
2031 I Procurement I Aircraft Procurement, Army
TV $M
Fiscal Non End
Quantity End Item Non
Year Item Total Total Total
Recurring Recurring
Recurring Flyaway Support Program
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
2004 13.5 13.5 13.5
2005 5 82.5 6.1 5.6 94.2 2.8 97.0
2006 17 241.3 7.5 4.5 253.3 15.2 268.5
2007 72 1086.3 85.8 45.4 1217.5 54.4 1271.9
2008 77 1144.4 85.3 63.3 1293.0 61.6 1354.6
2009 66 962.3 92.0 9.0 1063.3 48.2 1111.5
2010 84 1182.5 172.0 4.5 1359.0 124.2 1483.2
2011 99 1512.5 131.4 36.2 1680.1 108.8 1788.9
2012 89 1298.0 174.5 35.9 1508.4 189.1 1697.5
2013 100 1263.9 179.6 3.7 1447.2 130.3 1577.5
2014 70 980.7 171.1 1.2 1153.0 76.0 1229.0
2015 87 1211.2 181.1 3.4 1395.7 72.9 1468.6
2016 107 1432.4 186.0 4.2 1622.6 91.8 1714.4
2017 65 1097.0 185.8 4.4 1287.2 58.6 1345.8
2018 60 911.3 241.9 1.0 1154.2 92.9 1247.1
2019 58 1012.1 168.4 1.3 1181.8 83.1 1264.9
2020 74 1234.5 186.4 3.2 1424.1 74.0 1498.1
2021 36 584.2 175.0 0.7 759.9 70.5 830.4
2022 24 518.8 198.9 10.5 728.2 40.4 768.6
2023 33 524.5 204.8 11.9 741.2 32.3 773.5
2024 28 548.8 209.9 0.6 759.3 45.7 805.0
2025 24 466.8 213.4 0.5 680.7 25.4 706.1
2026 24 514.1 220.4 0.5 735.0 25.3 760.3
2027 32 704.3 233.3 0.7 938.3 22.8 961.1
2028 31 475.5 232.6 0.7 708.8 31.1 739.9
2029 36.9 36.9 19.8 56.7
Subtotal 1362 20989.9 3993.6 252.9 25236.4 1597.2 26833.6

UNCLASSIFIED 20
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Annual Funding
2031 I Procurement I Aircraft Procurement, Army
BY 2005 $M 111

Fiscal Non End

Quantity End Item Non
Year Item Total Total Total
Recurring Recurring
Recurring Flyaway Support Program
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway A_
2004 13.4 13.4 13.4
2005 5 79.6 5.8 5.4 90.8 2.7 93.5
2006 17 226.6 7.0 4.2 237.8 14.3 252.1
2007 72 999.9 78.9 41.8 1120.6 50.1 1170.7
2008 77 1036.9 77.2 57.4 1171.5 55.8 1227.3
2009 66 859.5 82.2 8.0 949.7 43.1 992.8
2010 84 1038.2 150.9 4.0 1193.1 109.1 1302.2
2011 99 1304.2 113.3 31.2 1448.7 93.8 1542.5
2012 89 1100.6 148.0 30.4 1279.0 160.3 1439.3
2013 100 1052.7 149.6 3.1 1205.4 108.5 1313.9
2014 70 804.4 140.4 1.0 945.8 62.3 1008.1
2015 87 978.2 146.3 2.7 1127.2 58.9 1186.1
2016 107 1141.6 148.4 3.3 1293.3 73.1 1366.4
2017 65 857.0 145.3 3.4 1005.7 45.7 1051.4
2018 60 697.7 185.2 0.8 883.7 71.1 954.8
2019 58 758.3 126.2 1.0 885.5 62.2 947.7
2020 74 907.0 137.0 2.4 1046.4 54.3 1100.7
2021 36 421.2 126.2 0.5 547.9 50.8 598.7
2022 24 366.7 140.6 7.4 514.7 28.6 543.3
2023 33 363.5 141.9 8.2 513.6 22.4 536.0
2024 28 372.8 142.7 0.4 515.9 31.0 546.9
2025 24 310.9 142.2 0.3 453.4 16.9 470.3
2026 24 335.7 144.0 0.3 480.0 16.5 496.5
2027 32 450.9 149.4 0.4 600.7 14.6 615.3
2028 31 298.4 146.0 0.4 444.8 19.6 464.4
2029 22.7 22.7 12.2 34.9
Subtotal 1362 16762.5 3010.8 218.0 19991.3 1277.9 21269.2

UNCLASSIFIED 21
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Annual Funding
2020 Acq O&M I Operation and Maintenance, Army

Yea
Fis
l.
Mr
1111
TY "1-1
Total
Program
2019 19.1
2020 15.4
2021 13.9
2022 13.7
2023 14.1
2024 14.4
2025 14.4
2026 14.7
2027 14.9
2028 15.2
2029 7.8
Subtotal 157.6

UNCLASSIFIED 22
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Annual Funding
2020 I Acq O&M I Operation and Maintenance, Army
BY 2001111
Fisca
Year Total'
Program
2019 14.6
2020 11.5
2021 10.2
2022 9.9
2023 10.0
2024 10.0
2025 9.8
2026 9.8
2027 9.7
2028 9.7
2029 4.9
Subtotal 110.1

UNCLASSIFIED 23
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 201 9 SAR

Charts

UH-60M Black Hawk first began SAR reporting in December 2001

Program Acquisition Cost - UH-60M Black Hawk

Base Year 2005 $M

30303

A
25303 — A-

20330 •••

0
=• 15030
"ff

10300 —

5300 —

2032 2003 2034 2435 2003 2037 2003 2003 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 201,3 2017 2018 201S

SAR Submission Date

--w— Aoq Cost (TYS) —e— Acq Cost (BYS) - Percent Delivered — Percent Expended

Quantity - UH-60M Black Hawk

1400

1200 -4

1000-

z' 800-

600-

400-

200-

0
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2014 :
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2c/13 2015 2017
SAR Submission Date

Development QTY — Production QTY — Total QTY

UNCLASSIFIED 24
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Unit Cost - UH-60M Black Hawk

Base Year 2005 $M

20 25
20
15
.4
,------40-' 11- 15
10
5

--ar= 5
-10
15
2::.4 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
2003 ras 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019
SAR Submission Date

PAUC BYS —•— PAUC UCRB % Chg —•— PAUC Original % Chg APUC Original % Chg
APUC BYS —8— APUC UCRB % Chg

UNCLASSIFIED 25
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Risks

Significant Schedule and Technical Risks

Significant Schedule and Technical Risks

Development and qualification of the Fly-By-Wire Active Inceptor System (AIS) is on the critical path for the
program. This is the first rotorcraft implementation of the AIS. Safety of Flight testing and approval for the AIS
has no slack to first flight.
2. Common Aviation Architecture System is not compliant with current and emerging civil navigation ORD
requirements for Global Positioning System terminal and non-precision approaches equivalent to Advisory
Circular 90-96a and Technical Standard Order-c129a Class Cl for Precision Area Navigation.
3. The Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) flight test design has successfully completed the March
2007 Critical Design Review, is operating very well in the test cell. Software is being provided to Sikorsky for
integration to the Flight Control Simulation Integration Laboratory, and is on schedule to support the Upgrade
aircraft build and first flight. Temperature restrictions during flight test will not affect the Upgrade flight test
schedule. The fully compliant FADEC design is in process. A fit check of the increased volume Engine
Electronic Control Unit was conducted the week of April 3, 2007. The design review for the fully compliant
FADEC is tentatively scheduled for June 2007. The fully compliant FADEC will be inserted into the Upgrade
flight test in February 2008.
Current Estimate (December 2019)
1. Potential fluctuations in yearly aircraft procurement quantities (dropping below 36 aircraft per year) could
break the Multi-Year IX (MY IX) contract and increases the likelihood of a Nunn-McCurdy breach. Significant
reductions in quantities, driven by Aviation Restructuring Initiative or PB perturbations negatively impact unit
costs and production flow. Breaking the multi-year would negatively affect FMS and set a bad precedent
regarding DoD multi-year contracts. Mitigation: The PM is working with the Department of the Army to
maintain aircraft quantity commitment to those identified in the MY IX proposal. The PM is working with
Sikorsky to mitigate the impacts and keep MY IX whole should the quantities fluctuate below the required
minimums.

UNCLASSIFIED 26
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Risks

Risk and Sensitivity Analysis

Risks and Sensitivity Analysis

Current Baseline Estimate (June 2011) IMI MMI
1. The Configuration Steering Board recommended to the DAE that the UH-60 Modernization Program
restructure. The recommendation included three parts: 1) Produce UH-60M baseline aircraft only: 2)
Complete Development Testing on Fly-By-Wire aircraft: and 3) Migrate selected technologies from the
upgrade development efforts to the baseline configuration. The recommendation was approved by the DAE
on February 18, 2010 in a signed ADM. The ADM also directed the Program to be rebaselined with updates
to the Acquisition Strategy, Test & Evaluation Master Plan and APB as a result of this restructure. On May
18, 2010, the Aviation Synchronization Conference Council of Colonels recommended the Authorized
Acquisition Objective increase from 1227 to 1365. Two additional aircraft were procured in the upgrade
configuration and these two aircraft will not be fielded. The increase in quantities resulted in Total
Procurement Cost increase over the Threshold value resulting in a Total Procurement Cost programmatic
breach. The program went through the process of developing an Army Cost Position to rebaseline the
program.
Original Baseline Estimate (February 2002)
1. The Milestone B DAB Approved Entry into System Development and Demonstration Phase in April 2001.
Revised Original Estimate (March 2005)
1. In December 2004, the Army changed the Acquisition Strategy in favor of UH-60M new build versus
recapitalization and realigned procurement funding from modifications (Aircraft Procurement. Army Line
Item AA0492) to new build production. The DAB approved the Milestone Con March 15, 2005. The
approved APB includes the UH-60M Upgrade program development, integration and qualification and the
new build UH/HH-60M aircraft rather than recapitalized aircraft. The UH-60M Upgrade program includes
Common Avionics Architecture System, Fly-By-Wire, and Full Authority Digital Engine Control development
and integration on the UH-60M aircraft.
Current Procurement Cost (December 2019)
1. The UH-60M current estimate is based on the 2011 Army Cost Position and adjusted for fact of life
changes. The UH-60M program experienced funding challenges which impacted the quantity of aircraft
procured, therefore increasing unit costs and driving cost growth. Given the current and anticipated fiscal
environment, there may be continued budgetary pressures on the program. The Black Hawk program
signed a five year Multi-Year contract from FY 2017 to FY 2021.

UNCLASSIFIED 27
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Low Rate Initial Production

Approval Date 3/31/2005 3/31/2005

Approved Quantity 40 40
Reference Milestone C ADM Milestone C ADM
Start Year 2005 2005
End Year 2007 2007

Notes
The Milestone C ADM dated March 31, 2005, approved up to 40 LRIP aircraft and supported the award an Advance
Procurement Contract for the first lot of FRP aircraft.

UNCLASSIFIED 28
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Foreign Military Sales

Date of Total
Country Description
Sale Quantity Cost $M
Croatia 3/15/2019 2 33.4 Case Number 7L-B-UGK
Latvia 2/22/2019 4 56.0 Case Number LG-B-UDM
Thailand 4/17/2017 4 90.1 Case Number TH-B-UAE
Saudi Arabia 7/5/2016 9 147.4 Case Number SR-B-ZAD
Jordan 6/10/2016 4 52.0 Case Number U6-B-UAA
Jordan 3/12/2016 8 133.0 Case Number U4-B-UXA
Saudi Arabia 9/15/2015 24 698.0 Case Number SI-B-WXZ
Saudi Arabia 9/15/2015 24 733.0 Case Number SI-B-WYA
Jordan 6/19/2015 1 17.2 Case Number JO-B-YAT
Slovakia 4/21/2015 9 170.1 Case Number LO-B-UCI
Tunisia 1/12/2015 8 114.7 Case Number TU-B-USS
Mexico 8/8/2014 7 163.6 Case Number MX-B-UEU
Mexico 7/22/2014 18 462.2 Case Number MX-B-UES
Thailand 9/25/2012 1 31.0 Case Number TH-B-UAE
Thailand 12/26/2011 2 62.3 Case Number TH-B-UAD
Saudi Arabia 11/30/2011 24 638.3 Case Number SI-B-WXP
Sweden 1/14/2011 15 275.7 Case Number SW-B-WAD
Taiwan 11/22/2010 60 1717.7 Case Number TW-B-YZC
Jordan 9/1/2010 2 26.3 Case Number JO-B-WAT
Mexico 8/3/2010 3 83.9 Case Number MX-B-UEJ
United Arab Emirates 12/12/2007 40 825.0 Case Number AE-B-ZUE
Bahrain 9/18/2007 9 151.9 Case Number BA-B-UIR

Notes
To date all FMS are for the UH-60M Black Hawk configuration of the aircraft. The Total Cost reflects all costs associated
with the procurement of the aircraft and other services provided to the specific country to include training and spares.

UNCLASSIFIED 29
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Nuclear Costs

None

UNCLASSIFIED 30
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Unit Cost

Current UCR Baseline and Current Estimate (Base-Year Dollars)

Current UCR % Change

Current Estimate
Baseline
(Dec 2019 SAR)
(Jun 2011 APB)
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost 22635.0 22140.6
Quantity 1375 1370
Unit Cost 16.462 16.161 -1.83
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost 21873.7 21269.2
Quantity 1367 1362
Unit Cost 16.001 15.616 -2.41

Original UCR Baseline and Current Estimate (Base-Year Dollars)

1 BY 2005 $M mg BY 2005 $M 111111
I Revised "111
Original UCR Current Estimate % Change
Baseline (Dec 2019 SAR)
(Mar 2005 APB)
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost 16801.7 22140.6
Quantity 1235 1370
Unit Cost 13.605 16.161 +18.79
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost 16084.2 21269.2
Quantity 1227 1362
Unit Cost 13.109 15.616 +19.12

UNCLASSIFIED 31
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

APB Unit Cost History

AM PAU
A APU

. t
(*.
..442q/ ..,
cf. v. e. \ '
e.

<-
ef''' •,ts'i
0`-'
.0 .).
0

Original APB Feb 2002 9.250 9.042 12.008 11.812

APB as of January 2006 Mar 2005 13.605 13.109 16.880 16.388
Revised Original APB Mar 2005 13.605 13.109 16.880 16.388
Prior APB Feb 2007 14.872 14.338 18.840 18.319
Current APB Jun 2011 16.462 16.001 20.432 19.981
Prior Annual SAR Dec 2018 16.171 15.615 20.310 19.725
Current Estimate Dec 2019 16.161 15.616 20.271 19.702

SAR Unit Cost History

Initial SAR Baseline to Current SAR Baseline (TY $M)

Initial PAUC Changes PAUC
Development Production
Estimate Econ Eng Est 0th Total Estimate
12.008 -0.325 4.705 -0.262 0.996 -0.326 0.000 0.084 4.872 16.880

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

16.880 -0.239 0.674 1.008 0.478 0.818 0.000 0.652 3.391 20.271

UNCLASSIFIED 32
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Initial SAR Baseline to Current SAR Baseline (TY $M)

Changes APUC
Production
Eng Est Total Estimate
11.812 -0.324 4.469 -0.287 0.987 -0.354 0.000 0.085 4.576 16.388

• Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

APUC 11111MINIIIrChanges APUC
Production Current
l ir Schil l
Estimate Econ Qty Eng Esaid 0th Spt Total Estimate
16.388 -0.245 0.727 0.994 0.483 0.699 0.000 0.656 3.314 19.702

SAR Baseline History

SAR 1111111M- SAR I " - SAR
Current
Item Planning ir Development • Production
Estimate
Estimate Estimate Estimate
Milestone A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Milestone B N/A Apr 2001 Mar 2001 Mar 2001
Milestone C N/A Mar 2004 Feb 2005 Mar 2005
FUE N/A Sep 2006 Jan 2008 Feb 2008
Total Cost (TY $M) N/A 14662.0 20847.1 27771.6
Total Quantity N/A 1221 1235 1370
PAUC N/A 12.008 16.880 20.271

UNCLASSIFIED 33
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Cost Variance

1 Summary TY $M
Item RDT&E Procurement MILCON Acq O&M Total
SAR Baseline (Production 739.3 20107.8 20847.1
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic +3.9 -316.1 +1.3 -310.9
Quantity +3203.0 +3203.0
Schedule +27.5 +1366.4 +1393.9
Engineering -2.1 +657.2 +655.1
Estimating +11.8 +953.0 +178.4 +1143.2
Other
Support +893.6 +893.6
Subtotal +41.1 +6757.1 +179.7 +6977.9
Current Changes
Economic -17.2 -17.2
Quantity
Schedule -12.8 -12.8
Engineering
Estimating -0.7 -22.1 -22.8
Other
Support -0.6 -0.6
Subtotal -31.3 -22.1 -53.4
Total Changes +41.1 +6725.8 +157.6 +6924.5
Current Estimate 780.4 26833.6 157.6 27771.6

UNCLASSIFIED 34
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Summary BY 2005 $M
Item RDT&E Procurement MILCON Acq O&M Total
SAR Baseline (Production 717.5 16084.2 16801.7
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity +2272.3 +2272.3
Schedule +24.1 +894.8 +918.9
Engineering +9.5 +529.3 +538.8
Estimating +10.2 +793.2 +124.9 +928.3
Other
Support +694.0 +694.0
Subtotal +43.8 +5183.6 +124.9 +5352.3
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating +1.3 -14.8 -13.5
Other
Support +0.1 +0.1
Subtotal +1.4 -14.8 -13.4
Total Changes +43.8 +5185.0 +110.1 +5338.9
Current Estimate 761.3 21269.2 110.1 22140.6

Previous Estimate: December 2018

UNCLASSIFIED 35
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A -17.2

Acceleration of procurement buy profile from FY 2027- FY 2028 to FY 2018. 0.0 -12.8
(Schedule)
Revised estimate due to acceleration of procurement buy profile. (Estimating) -2.6 -5.3
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) +3.9 +4.6
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support) 0.0 +0.4
Decrease in Other Support due to acceleration of procurement buy profile. (Support) -0.1 -0.7
Increase in Initial Spares. (Support) +0.2 -0.3
Procurement Subtotal +1.4 -31.3

Acq O&M $M
Base Then
Current Change Explanations
Year Year.
Estimate revised to reflect reduction in core civilian support. (Estimating) -14.8 -22.1
Acq O&M Subtotal -14.8 -22.1

UNCLASSIFIED 36
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Contracts

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: Multi-Year IX
Contractor: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Contractor Location: 6900 Main St
Stratford, CT 06614
Contract Number: W58RGZ-17-C-0009
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price (FFP)
Award Date: June 30, 2017
Definitization Date: June 30, 2017

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
3199.2 N/A 217 3985.4 N/A 272 3985.4 3985.4

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to purchase of
additional aircraft.

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

Cost and Schedule Variance reporting is not required on this (FFP) contract.

Notes
This information includes only the Army portion of the current Multi-Year IX contract.

UNCLASSIFIED 37
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Deliveries and Expenditures

Deliveries
Planned to Percent
Delivered to Date Actual to Date Total Quantity
Date Delivered
Development 8 8 8 100.00%
Production 1057 1059 1362 77.75%
Total Program Quantity Delivered 1065 1067 1370 77.88%

Expended and Appropriated (TV $M)

Total Acquisition Cost 27771.6 Years Appropriated 21
Expended to Date 19960.7 Percent Years Appropriated 70.00%
Percent Expended 71.87% Appropriated to Date 21246.9
Total Funding Years 30 Percent Appropriated 76.51%

The above data is current as of February 10, 2020.

Notes

The H-60M APO is 1,375 aircraft and consists of 1,365 aircraft that will be sustained and 10 test aircraft that are not fielded
or sustained. Eight of the 10 test aircraft were procured with RDTE funds and two of the aircraft were procured using a
combination of APA and RDTE funding. These two aircraft were taken off the production line and upgraded with RDTE
funding resulting in a total of 1,367 procurement aircraft.

The Army Acquisition Executive approved the Blackhawk Exchange and Sales Team (BEST) program that avoids
demilitarization and divestiture costs and applies both non-appropriated funding and appropriated funding proceeds received
from the divestiture of non-excess, obsolete H-60 aircraft towards the procurement of replacement H-60M aircraft. The
authorities and policies to execute and administer the BEST program are provided in section 503, title 40, U.S. Code and
Army regulations 725-1.

A total of 13 aircraft have been procured with BEST proceeds. Five (5) of those aircraft were procured using BEST non-
appropriated funding and 8 aircraft were procured with BEST appropriated funding via a reprogramming action. The 1,367
procurement aircraft less the five (5) BEST non-appropriated funded aircraft result in the current procurement estimate of
1,362 aircraft. The 13 BEST aircraft were procured in the FY's as follows; FY 2015 two aircraft, FY 2016 three aircraft,
FY2018 four aircraft and in FY 2019 four aircraft.

UNCLASSIFIED 38
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Operating and Support Cost

Cost Estimate Details

Date of Estimate: June 30, 2019
Source of Estimate: POE
Quantity to Sustain: 1365
Unit of Measure: Aircraft
Service Life per Unit: 25.00 Years
Fiscal Years in Service: FY 2006 - FY 2053

A total of 1.375 UH-60M aircraft will be procured. The operating and support sustainment cost is based on 1,365 fielded
aircraft. The eight RDTE funded prototype aircraft and two procurement/RDTE aircraft in an upgrade configuration will not
be fielded or sustained.

Sustainment Strategy
The UH-60M Black Hawk follows the standard Army maintenance model of two-level maintenance -Field Maintenance
Level and Sustainment Maintenance Level as defined by TC 3-04.7 (FM 3-04.500), Army Aviation Maintenance regulation.
However, the training base will continue as Contractor Logistics Support. Field Maintenance and Sustainment
Maintenance comes under the Army national maintenance program (NMP). Field Maintenance is performed by Combat
Aviation Brigade (CAB) / Air Cavalry Services (ACS) personnel assigned to flight companies, aviation maintenance
companies, and aviation support companies. Sustainment Maintenance is divided and primarily performed by three
separate entities: the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) and contractor field service representatives; Army depots
located at fixed bases in the continental United States; and by the national maintenance sources of repair.

Antecedent Information
The antecedent system is UH-60L Black Hawk. The total O&S Costs for UH-60L Black Hawk were not reported in the last
UH-60L Black Hawk SAR dated December 31, 1999. The information in the O&S Cost Table is based on O&S
Management Information Systems (OSMIS) data for the UH-60L Black Hawk (excluding Contingency
Operations). Sustaining support costs for the UH-60L Black Hawk aircraft are not included in the table because the costs
(software maintenance, system specific base operations, systems engineering/program management and
transportation) are not collected in OSMIS. There are 780 UH-60L Black Hawks in the current fleet with an Economic
Useful Life expectancy of 25 years.

UNCLASSIFIED 39
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Annual O&S Costs BY2005 $K

L
UH-60L Black Hawk (Antecedent)
UH-60M Black Hawk
Cost Element Average Annual O&S Cost Per
Average Annual Cost Per Aircraf_taill
Aircraft
Unit-Level Manpower 426.593 426.000
Unit Operations 54.136 54.000
Maintenance 374.606 285.000
Sustaining Support 1.225 0.000
Continuing System Improvements 6.157 0.000
Indirect Support 215.986 216.000
Other 0.000 0.000
Total 1078.703 981.000

Total O&S Cost $M

Item
UH-60M Black Hawk1111
UH-60L Black Hawk
Current Production APB (Antecedent)
Current Estimate
Objective/Threshold
Base Year 17652.5 19417.8 36810.7' N/A
Then Year 26086.5 N/A 60911.2 N/A
APB O&S Cost Breach

The UH-60M Black Hawk APB dated June 2011 represents O&M costs only and a 20-year service life. The Current
Estimate reflects all O&S costs and a 25-year service life. The key difference between the O&M cost and the O&S cost is
that O&M costs do not include Military Personnel costs.

Equation to Translate Annual Cost to Total Cost

Average Annual Cost per Aircraft x quantity fielded x Economic Useful Life

$1.078703M X (1375-10=1365) x 25 years =$36,810.7 (BY 2005M)

O&S Cost Variance

M I, Category

Prior SAR Total O&S Estimates - Dec

I BY 2005
$M
36810.7
Change Explanations I'M

2018 SAR
Programmatic/Planning Factors 0.0
Cost Estimating Methodology 0.0
Cost Data Update 0.0
Labor Rate 0.0
Energy Rate 0.0
Technical Input 0.0
Other 0.0

UNCLASSIFIED 40
 UNCLASSIFIED
UH-60M Black Hawk December 2019 SAR

Total Changes 0.0

Current Estimate 36810.7

Disposal Estimate Details

Date of Estimate: February 20, 2019
Source of Estimate: POE
Disposal/Demilitarization Total Cost (BY 2005 $M): 83.0

The U.S. Army Environmental Center developed the disposal cost estimate. The estimate includes effort for pollution
prevention, aircraft wash waste, painting/de-painting and Programmatic Environmental, Safety and Occupational
Evaluation (PESHE).

UNCLASSIFIED 41