Uv SF
Uv SF
Article
Effects of Ultraviolet Light Irradiation on Silk Fibroin Films
Prepared under Different Conditions
Sora Lee, Soo Hyun Kim, You-Young Jo, Wan-Taek Ju, Hyun-Bok Kim and HaeYong Kweon *
Sericultural and Apicultural Materials Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA,
Wanju-gun 55365, Korea; [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (S.H.K.); [email protected] (Y.-Y.J.);
[email protected] (W.-T.J.); [email protected] (H.-B.K.)
* Correspondence: [email protected]
Abstract: Silk fibroin (SF)-based materials are exposed to both natural and artificial ultraviolet (UV)
light during preparation or administration. However, the effects of UV irradiation on SF films
prepared under different conditions have not yet been described in detail. In this study, four SF films
with different molecular weight (MW) distribution were fabricated using SF solutions, which were
prepared by dissolving degummed SF for 0.5–24 h. We observed UV (365 nm) irradiation on SF films
induced the increase of yellowness and absorbance at 310 nm of SF films, indicating the formation
of new photo-products and di-tyrosine bonds by photo-oxidation. Due to di-tyrosine cross-links
between SF chains, UV-irradiated SF films were not fully dissociated in urea solution. In addition to
formation of new products, UV reduced the crystallinity of SF films by breaking hydrogen bonds of
β-sheet conformation. Unlike the UV-induced decomposition of physical interactions, UV did not
affect the covalent bonds (i.e., peptide bonds). Through these experiments, we could expect that SF
with higher MW was more susceptible and SF with lower MW was more resistant to UV-induced
photo-oxidation and photo-degradation. These results provide useful information about UV-induced
aging of SF-based materials under natural sunlight and UV irradiating conditions.
Keywords: silk fibroin film; ultraviolet aging; photo-oxidation; photo-degradation
Citation: Lee, S.; Kim, S.H.; Jo, Y.-Y.;
Ju, W.-T.; Kim, H.-B.; Kweon, H.
Effects of Ultraviolet Light Irradiation
on Silk Fibroin Films Prepared under
1. Introduction
Different Conditions. Biomolecules
2021, 11, 70. https://doi.org/
Silk fibroin (SF) is one of well-known natural protein materials obtained from silk-
10.3390/biom11010070 worms. The primary structure of SF is highly unique and composed of repetitive glycine-
alanine-glycine-alanine-glycine-serine (GAGAGS) [1]. These repeating sequences form the
Received: 30 October 2020 crystalline region with β-sheet conformation maintained by various molecular interactions
Accepted: 4 January 2021 such as hydrogen bonds, van der Waals interaction, and hydrophobic interaction. The
Published: 7 January 2021 crystalline regions contribute to the strength of SF. In contrast, amorphous regions of
relatively hydrophilic blocks composed of random/α-helix conformations contribute to
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- the elasticity of SF.
tral with regard to jurisdictional clai- Because of the high crystallinity of the degummed SF, SF has been generally regarded
ms in published maps and institutio- as water-insoluble polymer. Instead of pure water, several chaotropic solvents [2] have been
nal affiliations. used for solubilization and application of SF in a variety of forms such as films, sponges,
hydrogels, or coating materials [3]. During the solubilization process of degummed SF, the
structure of SF can be affected by various conditions such as the type of solvent, dissolution
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Li-
time, and temperature, resulting in differences in physical and chemical features of SF. For
censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
example, different solvent systems that have different ionic forces can affect the molecular
This article is an open access article
weight (MW) and structure of SF [4]. Wang and colleagues compared the MW of SF
distributed under the terms and con- solutions dissolved in 9.3 M LiBr and Ajisawa’s reagent (CaCl2 /H2 O/EtOH (molar ratio
ditions of the Creative Commons At- 1/8/2)) by using Rouse-like rheological behavior, which enables the determination of
tribution (CC BY) license (https:// molecular weight of SF [2]. MW of LiBr-dissolved SF was 179 kDa, whereas MW of Ajisawa’s
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ reagent-dissolved SF was 128 kDa, indicating that LiBr solvent system was milder. In fact,
4.0/). Yamada et al. also found that Ajisawa’s reagent caused degradation of the heavy chain of
Six milliliters of 1.6 wt.% regenerated SF solutions were poured into 6-well plates and dried
in fume hoods to prepare regenerated SF films.
2.2. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Silver Staining
Protein concentration of each SF solution was measured using Bradford assay (Bio-Rad
laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and the solutions were mixed with 2X Laemmle buffer
(Bio-Rad) and 2.5% β-mercaptoethanol. Denatured SF samples at 95 ◦ C for 2 min were
loaded into the lanes of acrylamide gel (Bio-Rad) and electrophoresis was performed. Next,
the gel was stained using a silver staining kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according
to the manufacturer’s guide. Using the analyze line graph tool of the image processing
software (ImageJ), the gray value profile was created along each lane of the gel image. The
representative profile of three replicates was selected and shown herein.
where ∆L, ∆a, and ∆b are the difference between each color values of film specimen and
the standard.
Biomolecules 2021, 11, 70 determined by calculating the absorbance intensity ratios of 1620 cm−1/1652 cm−1 for amide
4 of 11
I and 1264 cm−1/1230 cm−1 for amide III crystallinity index.
Figure1.
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE
SDS-PAGEresults
resultsof
offour
foursilk
silkfibroin
fibroin(SF)
(SF)solutions.
solutions.(A)
(A)Silver-stained
Silver-stainedgel
gelimage
imageshowing
show-
ing difference
the the difference of SFs
of SFs in molecular
in molecular weight
weight distribution.The
distribution. Thelane
lane on
on the
the right
right side
side indicates
indicatesthe
the
molecular weight marker. The other four lanes represent SF with increasing dissolution time, from
left to right. (B) The gray value profiles of protein bands on the SDS-PAGE gel. The set of intensity
values is taken from each lane, from the top to the bottom, and plotted in the chart.
3.2. Effect of UV Irradiation on Color Change of SF Films
The difference in MW distribution of SF can generally affect molecular structu
Biomolecules 2021, 11, 70 physicochemical properties. Given the SDS-PAGE results, we hypothesized 5 of 11 t
groups dissolved for different times would show different susceptibility to UV irrad
To confirm this, dose-dependent color changes were evaluated. Total color diffe
3.2. Effect
(∆E) of UV Irradiation
calculated from valueson Colorof Change
Hunter of L
SF(lightness),
Films a (redness), and b (yellowness)
SF films were plotted
The difference in MW with yellowness
distribution of SF can index (b) asaffect
generally a function
molecular ofstructure
UV irradiation
and ti
physicochemical properties. Given the SDS-PAGE results, we hypothesized
depicted in Figure 2, ∆E was not affected by UV irradiation time, regardless of disso that SF groups
dissolved for different times would show different susceptibility to UV irradiation. To
time. In contrast, yellowness index tended to increase with UV irradiation. Especia
confirm this, dose-dependent color changes were evaluated. Total color differences (∆E)
yellowing
calculated fromeffect on the
values 0.5 SFLgroup
of Hunter wasastronger
(lightness), (redness),thanand bother groups,
(yellowness) forshowing
the SF mo
a 2-fold increase of yellowness index after 4 h of UV irradiation. In contrast, the yello
films were plotted with yellowness index (b) as a function of UV irradiation time. As
depictedof
indexes in Figure
the other2, ∆Egroups
was not were
affected by UVthan
lower irradiation
the 0.5time, regardless
h group even of dissolution
after 4 h of irrad
time. In contrast, yellowness index tended to increase with UV irradiation. Especially,
Yellowing is considered as one of the most important photo-oxidation markers
the yellowing effect on the 0.5 SF group was stronger than other groups, showing more
teins.
than aThe development
2-fold of yellowindex
increase of yellowness colorafterof SF 4 hfilms
of UVmight be because
irradiation. aromatic
In contrast, the amin
produced
yellowness new indexesproducts containing
of the other groups were chromophores
lower than the 0.5 under UVeven
h group light [17].
after 4 h Utilizing
of
irradiation. Yellowing is considered as one of the most important
siproteomic approach, Dyer and colleagues identified chromophoric photo-produ photo-oxidation markers
in proteins.
rived fromThe development
tyrosine of yellow color and
and tryptophan, of SF proposed
films might be thebecause aromatic amino
photo-oxidation pathway
acids produced new products containing chromophores under UV light [17]. Utilizing a
Therefore, these color measurement results indicate the
quasiproteomic approach, Dyer and colleagues identified chromophoric photo-products
MW of SF can affect the su
bility
derivedto from
UV-induced
tyrosine and production
tryptophan,of andchromophores. We also expected
proposed the photo-oxidation pathways that UV irra
[18].
can be an these
Therefore, ecosustainable technique
color measurement resultsfor modifying
indicate the MWcolorof SF properties
can affect theof SF film with
suscepti-
bility to UV-induced production of chromophores. We also expected
ing chemical reagents. Similarly, Sagnella and colleagues modified the color prope that UV irradiation
can be an ecosustainable technique for modifying color properties of SF film without using
silk fiber and silk fibroin by doping RhoB in the artificial diet during silkworm
chemical reagents. Similarly, Sagnella and colleagues modified the color properties of silk
[19].
fiberWith
and silkthe increase
fibroin of feeding
by doping RhoB in time of RhoB-added
the artificial diet from
diet during silkworm 0 to[19].
raising 72 h,Withchromatic
increased and hue angle (h°) decreased, indicating the color
the increase of feeding time of RhoB-added diet from 0 to 72 h, chromaticity (C) increased change from between
and hue angle ◦
(h ) decreased, indicating
green and yellow components to anthe color change
almost from between
red-purple bluish-green and
component.
yellow components to an almost red-purple component.
A. 0.5 h B. 2h
3 3 3 3
Yellowness Yellowness
(normalized by std.)
(normalized by std.)
ΔE ΔE
Yellowness index
Yellowness index
2 2 2 2 ΔE
ΔE
1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
UV irradiation time (h) UV irradiation time (h)
C. 8h D. 24 h
3 3 3 3
Yellowness Yellowness
(normalized by std.)
(normalized by std.)
ΔE ΔE
Yellowness index
Yellowness index
2 2 2 2
ΔE
ΔE
1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
UV irradiation time (h) UV irradiation time (h)
Figure 2. Yellowness and total color differences (∆E) of UV-irradiated SF films (1–4 h) prepared with
Figure
four SF2. Yellowness
solutions anddissolved
that were total color
for differences
different times(ΔE) of h;
(A: 0.5 UV-irradiated SF24films
B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: h) (n(1–4
> 10;h) prep
with ± SEM).
meanfour SF solutions that were dissolved for different times (A: 0.5 h; B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: 24 h
10; mean ± SEM).
x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 11
A. 0.5 h B. 2h
1.2 0.20
UV 1.2 0.20
UV
OD (normalized by A280)
OD (normalized by A280)
0h 0h
1.0 0.15 1h 1.0 0.15 1h
0.8
0.10 2h 0.8
0.10 2h
0.05 3h 0.05 3h
0.6 4h 0.6 4h
0.00 0.00
300 305 310 315 320 300 305 310 315 320
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
270 290 310 330 350 270 290 310 330 350
Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm)
C. 8h D. 24 h
1.2 0.20
UV 1.2 0.20
UV
OD (normalized by A280)
OD (normalized by A280)
0h 0h
1.0 0.15
1h 1.0 0.15
1h
0.8
0.10 2h 0.8
0.10 2h
0.05 3h 0.05 3h
0.6 4h 0.6 4h
0.00 0.00
300 305 310 315 320 300 305 310 315 320
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
270 290 310 330 350 270 290 310 330 350
Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm)
Figure 3. Absorbance spectra of UV-irradiated SF films (1–4 h) prepared with four SF solutions that were dissolved for
Figure 3. Absorbance spectra of UV-irradiated SF films (1–4 h) prepared with four SF solutions
different times (A: 0.5 h; B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: 24 h).
that were dissolved for different times (A: 0.5 h; B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: 24 h).
To know the presence of newly formed cross-links between SF chains, we immersed
To know the presenceinof6 M
SF films urea solution
newly formedatcross-links
10 mg/mL and wait for SF
between 24 h. Becausewe
chains, it isimmersed
well known that
concentrated urea solution can easily break hydrogen bonds in SF, we expected SF films
SF films in 6 M urea solution at 10 mg/mL and wait for 24 h. Because it is well known that
would be dissolved. In fact, intact SF films were almost dissolved, remaining few solid-
concentrated urea solution can easily
state components, breakinhydrogen
as shown Figure 4A.bonds
However,in with
SF, wethe expected
increase of SF
UV films
irradiation
would be dissolved.time,
In fact,
larger amounts of undissolved and swollen films were observed for allsolid-
intact SF films were almost dissolved, remaining few SF groups,
state components, as shownSFinchains
indicating Figure
were4A. However, with
photo-cross-linked the increase
by chemical of UV of
bonds instead irradiation
hydrogen bonds.
time, larger amounts of undissolved and swollen films were observed for all SF groups,
indicating SF chains were photo-cross-linked by chemical bonds instead of hydrogen
bonds. The chemical bonds formed by UV irradiation are thought to be di-tyrosine bonds.
Biomolecules 2021, 11, 70 7 of 11
Figure 4. Morphologies of the remaining four SF films (A) and fluorescence intensity of the released SF molecules from
Figure 4. Morphologies of the remaining four SF films (A) and fluorescence intensity of the re-
SF films (B) after immersion of films in 6 M urea solution for 24 h (ex. 360/40; em. 460/40) (n = 3; mean ± SD; 1-fold: 0 h
leased SF molecules from SF films (B) after immersion of films in 6 M urea solution for 24 h (ex.
UV irradiation).
360/40; em. 460/40) (n = 3; mean ± SD; 1-fold: 0 h UV irradiation).
3.4. Effect of UV Irradiation on Structural Stability of SF Films
3.4. Effect of UV Irradiation on Structural Stability of SF Films
In addition to formation of new chemical bonds by UV, the high energy of UV can
In addition to induce
formation of new chemical
photo-degradation bonds
of hydrogen byand
bonds UV, the high
disulfide bonds.energy
Therefore,of UV can
we evaluated
by FT-IR the structural stability of four different SF films
induce photo-degradation of hydrogen bonds and disulfide bonds. Therefore, we evalu- after exposure to UV. FT-IR is very
useful tool for understanding the chemical and physical structure of silk proteins. In the
ated by FT-IR the structural stability of four different SF films after exposure to UV. FT-
literature, a semiquantitative approach was chosen by calculating the relative intensities
IR is very useful tool for understanding
of amide bands to know the theextent
chemical and physical
of SF degradation structure
[8]. The ratios ofoftwosilk pro-band
amide
teins. In the literature, a semiquantitative approach was chosen by calculating
intensities that indicate random/α-helix and β-sheet conformations have been used as the relative
intensities of amide one of degradation
bands to knowmarkers by comparing
the extent the crystallinity.
of SF degradation [8].Therefore,
The ratios we ofacquired
two FT-
IR spectra and calculated the ratio of 1620 cm−1 (β-sheet) to 1652 cm−1 (random coil)
amide band intensities that indicate random/α-helix and β-sheet conformations have been
for amide I crystallinity index (CI) and 1264 cm−1 (β-sheet) to 1230 cm−1 (random coil)
used as one of degradation
for amide IIImarkers by comparing
CI. The FT-IR the crystallinity.
spectra of nonirradiated Therefore,
and 4 h irradiated we ac-
SF films showed
quired FT-IR spectra and calculated
different absorbance the ratio of
intensities 1620
at the cm wavenumbers
−1
specific (β-sheet) to 1652 (cm cm
− 1 −1
), which(random
indicated β-
coil) for amide I crystallinity index coil
sheet and random (CI)structures
and 1264 cm−1 5).
(Figure (β-sheet) to of
In the case 1230 cm−1prepared
SF films (random bycoil)
a shorter
for amide III CI. The dissolution time (0.5of
FT-IR spectra h and 2 h SF groups),
nonirradiated the 4absorbance
and h irradiated valuesSFatfilms
1652 and 1230 cm−1
showed
indicated random coil structure increased after 4 h UV irradiation, whereas the values at
different absorbance intensities at the specific wavenumbers (cm−1), which indicated β-
1620 and 1264 cm−1 indicated β-sheet structure decreased or increased slightly. On the
sheet and random coil otherstructures
hand, in the(Figure 5).8In
case of the the 24
h and case ofgroups,
h SF SF films prepared
there by a shorter
were no significant changes
dissolution time (0.5 h and 2 h SF groups), the absorbance values at 1652 and 1230 cm−1
indicated random coil structure increased after 4 h UV irradiation, whereas the values at
1620 and 1264 cm−1 indicated β-sheet structure decreased or increased slightly. On the
other hand, in the case of the 8 h and 24 h SF groups, there were no significant changes in
ture was thought to be affected by breakage of hydrogen bonds involved in β-she
formation (Figure 6A). In addition, this result can explain the previously reported
Biomolecules 2021, 11, 70 ened mechanical properties of aged silk fibers under UV exposure [12,13]. 8 of Meanwh
11
1680 1660 1640 1620 1600 1280 1260 1240 1220 1200
1680 1660 1640 1620 1600 1280 1260 1240 1220 1200
1680 1660 1640 1620 1600 1280 1260 1240 1220 1200
1680 1660 1640 1620 1600 1280 1260 1240 1220 1200
5. FT-IR
Figure 5.
Figure FT-IRspectra
spectraof SFof films nonirradiated
SF films and irradiated
nonirradiated with UV light
and irradiated withforUV
4 h;light
(A) amide
for 4Ih; (A) am
region (1680–1600 cm −1 ), (B) amide III region (1280–1200 cm−1 ).
region (1680–1600 cm ), (B) amide III region (1280–1200 cm ).
−1 −1
moleculesBiomolecules FOR11,PEER
2021, 11, x2021, 70 REVIEW 9 of 11 9o
Figure 6. IAmide
Figure 6. Amide I and
and III III crystallinity
crystallinity index
index calculated from
calculated fromFT-IR spectra
FT-IR of UV-irradiated
spectra SF films prepared
of UV-irradiated SF filmswith four SF with four
prepared
solutions that were dissolved for different times (A: 0.5 h; B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: 24 h) (n > 6; mean
SF solutions that were dissolved for different times (A: 0.5 h; B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: 24 h) (n > 6; mean ± SEM). ± SEM).
From the TNBS assay results, we could not observe any remarkable differences in the
content of ε-amine group or newly formed N-terminal amine groups (Figure 7). These
0.5
A. results indicate h UV did not induce
that B. 2 and
chain scission h decrease MW for all SF groups.
0.8 0.8
Because peptide bonds are covalent, unlike the crystallinity that is maintained by physical
Absorbance at 340 nm
Absorbance at 340 nm
molecular interactions, stronger energy may be needed to break the peptide bonds. Consid-
0.6 that several other studies reported
ering 0.6the molecular degradation by UV [22], light with
higher energy or longer irradiation time than the light used for our study might induce
0.4 scissions and decrease the MW of
chain 0.4
SF.
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
UV irradiation time (h) UV irradiation time (h)
C. 8h D. 24 h
0.8 0.8
Absorbance at 340 nm
Absorbance at 340 nm
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
Figure 6. Amide I and III crystallinity index calculated from FT-IR spectra of UV-irradiated SF
Biomolecules 2021, 11, 70
films pre
10 of 11
SF solutions that were dissolved for different times (A: 0.5 h; B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: 24 h) (n > 6; mean ± SEM).
A. 0.5 h B. 2h
0.8 0.8
Absorbance at 340 nm
Absorbance at 340 nm
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
UV irradiation time (h) UV irradiation time (h)
C. 8h D. 24 h
0.8 0.8
Absorbance at 340 nm
Absorbance at 340 nm
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
UV irradiation time (h) UV irradiation time (h)
Figure 7. Absorbance at 340 nm obtained by 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) assay with
Figure 7. Absorbance
UV-irradiated SF films preparedatwith
340four
nmSFobtained bySFs
solutions. The 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene
were dissolved for differentsulfonic
times aci
(A: 0.5 h; B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: 24 h) (n = 3; mean ± SD).
UV-irradiated SF films prepared with four SF solutions. The SFs were dissolv
(A: 0.5 h; B: 2 h; C: 8 h; D: 24 h) (n = 3; mean ± SD).
4. Conclusions
In this study, investigation on the effect of UV irradiation on the physicochemical
properties of SF films prepared under different conditions was carried out. UV irradiation
on SF films not only formed of new bonds by photo-oxidation, but also damaged crys-
tallinity of SF by photo-degradation. These UV-induced photo-reactions were confirmed
by measuring color, UV–vis absorbance spectra, fluorescence, or FT-IR spectra. In addition,
we could observe that SF with higher MW was more susceptible to these UV irradiation
effects. To explain the exact mechanism about MW effect on photo-resistance of SF films,
further studies in the molecular levels may be required. In conclusion, we expect that our
study would provide useful information for preparing and applying SF-based materials
under natural sunlight or UV irradiating conditions.
References
1. Sionkowska, A.; Planecka, A. The influence of UV radiation on silk fibroin. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2011, 96, 523–528. [CrossRef]
2. Wang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Yang, Y.; Shao, Z. Effect of various dissolution systems on the molecular weight of regenerated silk fibroin.
Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 285–289. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Koh, L.-D.; Cheng, Y.; Teng, C.-P.; Khin, Y.-W.; Loh, X.-J.; Tee, S.-Y.; Low, M.; Ye, E.; Yu, H.-D.; Zhang, Y.-W. Structures, mechanical
properties and applications of silk fibroin materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 46, 86–110. [CrossRef]
4. Cheng, G.; Wang, X.; Tao, S.; Xia, J.; Xu, S. Differences in regenerated silk fibroin prepared with different solvent systems: From
structures to conformational changes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132. [CrossRef]
5. Yamada, H.; Nakao, H.; Takasu, Y.; Tsubouchi, K. Preparation of undegraded native molecular fibroin solution from silkworm
cocoons. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2001, 14, 41–46. [CrossRef]
6. Cho, H.J.; Ki, C.S.; Oh, H.; Lee, K.H.; Um, I.C. Molecular weight distribution and solution properties of silk fibroins with different
dissolution conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51, 336–341. [CrossRef]
7. Kim, H.; Song, D.; Kim, M.; Ryu, S.; Um, I.; Ki, C.; Park, Y. Effect of silk fibroin molecular weight on physical property of silk
hydrogel. Polymer 2016, 90, 26–33. [CrossRef]
8. Koperska, M.; Pawcenis, D.; Bagniuk, J.; Zaitz, M.; Missori, M.; Łojewski, T.; Łojewska, J. Degradation markers of fibroin in silk
through infrared spectroscopy. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2014, 105, 185–196. [CrossRef]
9. Okahisa, Y.; Narita, C.; Yamada, K. Fabrication and characterization of a novel silk fibroin film with UV and thermal resistance.
Mater. Today Comm. 2020, 101630. [CrossRef]
10. Vilaplana, F.; Nilsson, J.; Sommer, D.V.; Karlsson, S. Analytical markers for silk degradation: Comparing historic silk and silk
artificially aged in different environments. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 1433–1449. [CrossRef]
11. Liang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Dong, B.; Wang, S. Fabrication of Superhydrophobic and UV-Resistant Silk Fabrics with Laundering Durability
and Chemical Stabilities. Coatings 2020, 10, 349. [CrossRef]
12. Liu, H.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Yeerken, T.; Yu, W. Secondary structure transformation and mechanical properties of silk fibers by
ultraviolet irradiation and water. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89, 2802–2812. [CrossRef]
13. Aksakal, B.; Koç, K.; Yargı, Ö.; Tsobkallo, K. Effect of UV-light on the uniaxial tensile properties and structure of uncoated and
TiO2 coated Bombyx mori silk fibers. Spectrochim. Acta A 2016, 152, 658–665. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Sionkowska, A.; Płanecka, A. Surface properties of thin films based on the mixtures of chitosan and silk fibroin. J. Mol. Liq. 2013,
186, 157–162. [CrossRef]
15. Kale, R.; Bajaj, A. Ultraviolet spectrophotometric method for determination of gelatin crosslinking in the presence of amino
groups. J. Young Pharm. 2010, 2, 90–94. [CrossRef]
16. Zhou, C.Z.; Confalonieri, F.; Jacquet, M.; Perasso, R.; Li, Z.G.; Janin, J. Silk fibroin: Structural implications of a remarkable amino
acid sequence. Proteins 2001, 44, 119–122. [CrossRef]
17. Sashina, E.; Bochek, A.; Novoselov, N.; Kirichenko, D. Structure and solubility of natural silk fibroin. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2006, 79,
869–876. [CrossRef]
18. Dyer, J.; Bringans, S.; Bryson, W. Characterisation of photo-oxidation products within photoyellowed wool proteins: Tryptophan
and tyrosine derived chromophores. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2006, 5, 698–706. [CrossRef]
19. Sagnella, A.; Chieco, C.; Di Virgilio, N.; Toffanin, S.; Posati, T.; Pistone, A.; Bonetti, S.; Muccini, M.; Ruani, G.; Benfenati, V.; et al.
Bio-doping of regenerated silk fibroin solution and films: A green route for biomanufacturing. RSC adv. 2014, 4, 33687. [CrossRef]
20. Correia, M.; Neves-Petersen, M.T.; Jeppesen, P.B.; Gregersen, S.; Petersen, S.B. UV-light exposure of insulin: Pharmaceutical
implications upon covalent insulin dityrosine dimerization and disulphide bond photolysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50733. [CrossRef]
21. Kerwin, B.A.; Remmele, R.L., Jr. Protect from light: Photodegradation and protein biologics. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 96, 1468–1479.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Sionkowska, A.; Płanecka, A.; Lewandowska, K.; Michalska, M. The influence of UV-irradiation on thermal and mechanical
properties of chitosan and silk fibroin mixtures. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014, 140, 301–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]