0% found this document useful (0 votes)
283 views1 page

Rubric Oral Presentation

The rubric assesses oral presentations based on 5 criteria: greeting/farewell, organization, body language, vocabulary, and pronunciation/rhythm/intonation. For each criterion, students can receive a score of 1-5, with 5 being "excellent" and demonstrating all criteria, 3-4 being "quite good" but needing some improvement, and 1 being "low performance." Areas of assessment include design of digital sites, respect among group members, quality of information provided, and proper pronunciation during presentations.

Uploaded by

20300325
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
283 views1 page

Rubric Oral Presentation

The rubric assesses oral presentations based on 5 criteria: greeting/farewell, organization, body language, vocabulary, and pronunciation/rhythm/intonation. For each criterion, students can receive a score of 1-5, with 5 being "excellent" and demonstrating all criteria, 3-4 being "quite good" but needing some improvement, and 1 being "low performance." Areas of assessment include design of digital sites, respect among group members, quality of information provided, and proper pronunciation during presentations.

Uploaded by

20300325
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

ASSESSMENT RUBRIC.

ORAL PRESENTATION

Student's name: _______________________________________________________________________________________

2
5 3-4 1
ITEMS Need
Excellent (Quite) good Low performance
improvement
The digital site is exceptionally attractive
The digital site is a useful
and a useful showcase. It is easy to find The digital site is attractive
showcase, but it looks too full of The digital site has too much
GREETING / key elements and both blank spaces and and can be regarded as a
information and/or it is not information, it is detracting, and it is
FAREWELL multimedia elements as well as spatial useful showcase. Every key
engaging. Most elements are often difficult to find key elements.
principles are effectively used to organise element is easy to find.
easy to find.
the material.
The digital site has 1-3
The digital
spelling site is free of grammar and
mistakes. The digital site has 4-5 grammar The digital site has more than 5
ORGANIZATION grammar and/or spelling
and/or spelling mistakes. grammar and/or spelling mistakes.
mistakes.
The students are respectful
The students are respectful The students argue with one another
towards each others' ideas,
towards each others' ideas, and and/or do not respect each others'
The students are respectful towards each and are able to distribute
are able to distribute tasks in a ideas and contributions. Feedback is
others' ideas, are able to distribute tasks tasks in a fair way. Some of
BODY LANGUAJE fair way. However, there is little not positive and the members of the
in a fair way, show commitment to quality the students show
evidence that shows commitment team do not support each other. The
and support one another. commitment towards quality
towards quality by the members project has been carried out by 1 or 2
and support one another, but
of the team. members of the team.
not all.
The author has included lots of The author has provided the minimum
The author has made a neat information in the digital site, but information required in the digital site
The author has made an exemplary job
job at designing an engaging there is little evidence of the and has not adapted it in order to
VOCABULARY at designing a really engaging interesting
interesting site for its target intention of designing an design a more interesting site for its
site for its target audience.
audience. engaging and interesting site for target audience (e.g. only a list of links
its target audience. to content by others is provided).
All the material is Creative Commons,
Citing and Attributing is neatly Some of the material is Creative Citing and attributing guidelines have
and the author has made an exemplary
MATERIALS done and almost all the Commons but citing and not been taken into account and the
job when citing and attributing.
material is Creative Commons. attributing needs improving. material is not Creative Commons.
The pronunciation is often
The author makes an effort for
nice and both rhythm and
The pronunciation is nice and both adopting the adequate rhythm The author does not try to match the
PRONUNCIATION, intonation usually correspond
rhythm and intonation correspond to and/or intonation but it does not rhythm or the intonation expected in an
RHYTHM & to those expected in an
those expected in an interview, which often match that expected in an interview. Pronunciation must improve
INTONATION interview, which contributes
contributes to it being followed easily. interview. Pronunciation must a lot.
to it being followed quite
improve quite a lot.
easily.

You might also like