CAPSTONE PROJECT FORMAT

1 inch

CAPSTONE PROJECT TITLE (BOLDFACE); MUST NOT EXCEED THREE

LINES, UPPER LINES MUST BE LONGER THAN LOWER LINE OR THE

TITLE MUST FOLLOW THE INVERTED TRIANGLE FORMAT

3 double spaces

A Capstone Project

Submitted to the Faculty of the

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology of the

Bulacan Agricultural State College

3 double spaces

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree

1.5 inch 1 inch
Bachelor of Science in Information Technology

3 double spaces

by

Author M. LastName

3 double spaces

Adviser M. LastName

Adviser

2 double spaces

Month, Year

1 inch
 ii

APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE SHEET

1 double space
This capstone project entitled (All CAPS, Bold Typeface) prepared and submitted by
(All CAPS, Bold Typeface) in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY has been
examined and is recommended for approval and acceptance.
1 double space

Signature
PRINTED NAME
Adviser
1 double space

1 double space
APPROVED by the Committee on Oral Examination with a grade of ________.
1 double space
Signature Signature
PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME
Panel Member Panel Member
_________________________ _________________________
Date Signed Date Signed

1 double space
Signature
PRINTED NAME
Lead Panel
_________________________
Date Signed
1 double space

ACCEPTED and APPROVED in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.
1 double space

Signature Signature
PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME
Program Chairperson, Information Dean, Institute of Engineering and
Technology Applied Technology
_________________________ _________________________
Date Signed Date Signed
 iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

1 double space
Should follow the same format as of the Executive Summary. The students are

encouraged to acknowledge their advisers, as well as other people who have had

contributed to the project whether direct or indirect. Dedications, Sayings and any verse

from the bible are not appropriate. Avoid the expressions such as “One of the

researchers would like to thank….”, “The proponents would like to extend……” or

“The proponents would like to thank……”. Write “M.C. Author thanks …..”

instead.

3 double space

M.M.C.

Author Initials
 iv

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 double space
This outline demonstrates the format of all Capstone Project final reports. All text

should use Times New Roman, should be double-spaced, justified, and 12 points size. All

sides should have a one-inch margin except the left side which has a one-and-a-half-inch

margin for binding purposes. Pages should be numbered with Roman Numerals from title

page to List of Figures, Tables and should be numbered with Arabic numerals thereafter.

Page numbers should appear at the upper right corner of each page, right aligned;

however page numbers should not appear on the title page and on the first page of every

chapter.

This part will discuss the summary of the Capstone Project. Important parts of the

paper should be discussed. The Executive Summary should only consist of one

paragraph, and ideally contain words not more than 200.

 v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 double space Page

TITLE PAGE ……………………………………………………………………. i

APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE ……………………………………………. ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENT ………………………………………………………... iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………………………… iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………….. v

LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………………. vii

LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………... viii

LIST OF APPENDICES ………………………………………………………... ix

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………. 1

Project Context ………………………………….………………………… 1

Purpose and Description ………………………………………………….. 1

Objectives of the Project ………………………………………………….. 1

Scope and Limitation ……………………………………………………... 2

Definition of Terms ..................................................................................... 2

CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ….………………… 3

CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY ……………………………………………. 4

 Environment ………………………………………………………………. 4

Requirements Specifications ……………………………….…………….. 4

Development Method ……………………………………………………... 6

Design of Software, Systems, and/or Processes…………..…………... 6

Development ………………………………..………………………… 6 vi

Testing and Evaluation………………………………………..……….. 6

CHAPTER IV: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION……………………………….. 7

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION …………………………………………………. 8

CHAPTER VI: RECOMMENDATION ……………………………………….. 9

BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………….. 10

APPENDICES
11
……………………………………………………………………..

A.
 vii

LIST OF TABLES
1 double space
TABLE NO. TITLE Page

1 Table Heading for Table 1 …………………………………… 6

2 Table Heading for Table 2 …………………………………… 7

 viii

LIST OF FIGURES
1 double space
FIGURE TITLE Page

NO.

1 Figure caption for Figure 1 …..………………………………. 6

2 Figure caption for Figure 2 …………………………………... 7

 ix

LIST OF APPENDICES
1 double space
APPENDICE NO. TITLE Page

A Title of Appendix A …..………………………………... 6

B Title of Appendix B…………………………………….. 7

 CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1 double space

Project Context

What is interesting, valuable or original in this project?

2 single space

Purpose and Description

What is this project and why do we need this project?

2 single space

Objectives

Should be measurable using the result of this project. Objectives should be

Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-bound.

Example:

General Objective

To develop an Automated Piglet Feeder System using Electronic

Controller Board for Bulacan Agricultural State College.

2 single space

Specific Objectives

The development of Automated Piglet Feeder System using Electronic

Controller Board for Bulacan Agricultural State College should be able to:

1. first objective;

2. second objective; and

3. last objective.
 2

Scope and Limitation

This will set your boundaries for the project. Scope deals with what your project

can do, while limitation deals with what your project can’t do.

2 single space

Definition of Terms

IT Term 1 – This is where the technical IT terms are discussed according to how

they are going to be used in the study.

IT Term 2 – This is where the technical IT terms are discussed according to how

they are going to be used in the study.

.
 CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

1 double space

This part will explain recent publications or studies that will support the project’s

purpose. It will not showcase what other people have done. This requires a minimum of

five (5) local and international literatures which covers studies within the last ten (10)

years. Every publication or study should be cited accordingly (Ex: According to

Author,MC). Create your own new knowledge through primary studies. Synthesize and

analyse existing knowledge in a new conceptual framework through secondary studies.

Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, omissions or bias in the previous work. Identify key

issues or questions that are troubling the research community. Point the gaps that have

not previously been identified or addressed by researchers. The following can be used as

reference or source in literature review; Main source: Refereed research papers, books are

good for understanding the problem and building a conceptual framework and theories.

Manuals are good for understanding e.g. a system, but not as a source of a review and

reports sometimes good research quality but not peer-reviewed. Newspapers, magazines,

radio, television can be good quality "expert opinion" but not peer-reviewed.
 CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY
1 double space

Environment

For organization specific capstone projects, where population of the study,

organizational chart and profile is discuss.

2 single space

Requirements Specifications

This part will discuss the requirements set by the client (user of the

system/website/network). The Entity Relationship Diagram, Data Dictionary and other

necessary data may be used to aid in the discussion of the requirements.

2 single space

Operational Feasibility

Operational feasibility is a measure of how well a proposed system solves

the problems, and takes advantage of the opportunities identified during scope

definition and how it satisfies the requirements identified in the requirements

analysis phase of system development

2 single space

Technical Feasibility

This refers to the technical resources needed to develop, purchase, install

or operate the system.

 5

Schedule Feasibility

The project can be finish and implemented in an acceptable time frame.

 Gantt Chart/PERT CPM Chart

2 single space

Economic Feasibility

This will discuss the projected benefits of the proposed system.

 Cost and Benefit Analysis

 Cost Recovery Scheme

2 single space

Conceptual Framework

The purpose of this part is to discuss the conceptual framework that examines

information technology (IT) governance effectiveness, its determinants, and its impacts

on its client. This article describes how information systems in the human services can be

facilitated with a framework that addresses the fundamental roles of data, information

and knowledge in understanding organizational information systems.

Development Method

This part will discuss the method to be use in developing the project. For software

development, web development and game development it can either be structured (e.g.
 6

Waterfall model), object-oriented or agile method (e.g. prototyping, iterative, spiral

model). For e-learning modules, instructional software design method (e.g. ADDIE

model, Extreme Programming etc.) is to be used. For network design and

implementation, discuss the network model to be used and the routing protocol to be

followed. The study may also be in line with the new trends today like the IoT ( Internet

of Things that can be implemented within the school vicinity.

Design of Software, Systems, and/or Processes

After setting the requirements, the student should discuss the design of their

projects whether it is software, system and/or processes using either of the

following:

A. Network Design and Implementation and Server Farm Configuration

and Management

1. Network Floor Layout

2. Routing Table

3. CAT Sheet

B. Software Development/ Game Development/Interactive

Systems/Information Kiosks

1. Context Diagram (structured/agile)

2. Data Flow Diagram (structured/agile)

3. Use Case (object oriented)

 4. Class Diagram (object oriented)
7
5. Sequence Diagram (object oriented)

6. Transition State Diagram (object oriented)

7. UML Diagram (agile)

8. Schematic Diagram (w/hardware integration)

9. Block Diagram (w/hardware integration)

10. Flowchart

C. E-Learning Systems

1. ADDIE Model

2. Storyboard

D. IT Management

1. Flowchart

2. Organizational Structure

E. IT in Society (Note: Have a different format in Introduction and Methodology.)

1. Theoretical Framework

2. Research Framework

2 single space

Development

This part will discuss the following:

- Software Specification

- Hardware Specification

- Program Specification
 - Programming Environment

o Front End

o Back End
8

Testing and Evaluation

This part will confer the turn of events during the development and testing

of the system and/or process. Bugs, errors, other constraints and solutions to these

problems should be discussed.

single space
Unit Testing

This is the method of testing each program or module. The

objective of this phase is to identify and eliminate errors that could cause

logic errors and unusual program termination. This section will be based

from the Use Case Diagram and should be discuss with screenshots under

the Chapter 4: Results and Discussion.

single space

Integration Testing

Also called link testing, this is done for two or more programs that

depend on each other. Integration testing has the following series of tests

to guarantee error-free system integration. Screenshots and discussion

should be in Chapter 4: Results and Discussion.

o Compatibility Testing

o Performance Testing

o Stress Testing

o Load Testing
 9

System Testing

Sometimes called acceptance testing which involves the entire

system to be tested. Screenshots and discussion should be in Chapter 4:

Results and Discussion.

Evaluation

To determine the sample size of evaluation population, students

can either use Sloven’s formula or the total population sampling. Sloven’s

formula is use for a large population while the total population sampling is

use to examine the entire population which has a particular set of

characteristics.

For further information regarding population sampling, you may

visit the following websites:

1) http://dissertation.laerd.com/total-population-sampling.php

2) http://www.statisticshowto.com/how-to-use-slovins-formula/
 To analyze the data gathered from the evaluation or for the system

testing, the students may use but not limited to any of the following:

1) T-test

2) Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test

3) Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

4) Chi-Squared Test

5) Correlation Coefficients

6) Linear Regression Models

7) Logistic Regression Analysis

For further example and discussion of the evaluation tool, students

may visit the following websites:

1) http://www.acfas.org/Physicians/Content.aspx?id=674

2) https://www.princeton.edu/~cap/AEESP_Statchap_Peters.pdf

2 single space

Implementation Plan

A schedule both agreed by the client and the student must be planned

and illustrated using a Gantt chart. A detailed discussion on implementation

schedule should be highlighted on this part. This can include the following:

- Project Implementation Checklist

- Implementation Contingency

- Infrastructure/Deployment
 CHAPTER IV

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1 double space

A discussion on the results during implementation, bugs, errors and other

constraints experienced based from the objectives of the project. Solutions to these

problems should also be discussed. This will discuss the project’s result and Analysis

Report.
 CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION

1 double space

Conclusion section is required. It may review the main points of your paper, do

not summarize your paper as the conclusion. This part will discuss if the objectives has

been satisfied. Do not conclude anything beyond your findings and analysis. The

conclusion might elaborate the importance of work. Limit the discussion into two (2)

paragraphs.
 CHAPTER VI

RECOMMENDATION

1 double space

The recommendation section may recommend or suggest applications or

extensions that will further improve the project.

 12

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 double space

Follow the APA format and must be alphabetized.

A. Books

Author(DATE).Title, Publisher

B. Unpublished Capstone Projects

Author(DATE).Title

C. Journals

D. Electronic Sources

Author(DATE)..”Title “.Retrieved Date, from weblink

E. Others
 13

APPENDICES

1 double space

Appendices should follow the same format as chapters. If there are multiple
appendices, label each one with letter, e.g. A: Appendix Title, B: Appendix Title, and so
on. A table of data necessary to explain or to support the project’s idea.

A: Canvassed Materials

Appendices should follow the same format as chapters. If there are multiple

appendices, label each one with letter, e.g. A: Appendix Title, B: Appendix Title, and

so on.

2 single space

B: User Manual/User Guide

Appendices should follow the same format as chapters. If there are multiple

appendices, label each one with letter, e.g. A: Appendix Title, B: Appendix Title, and

so on.

2 single space

C: Relevant Source Code

2 single space

D: Pictures (includes capstone presentation, capstone evaluation, awarding to client,

implementation)

2 single space

E: Plagiarism Certification – this includes the summary of output and certificate

 14

F: Sample Evaluation Instrument

Bulacan Agricultural State College

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology
Pinaod, San Ildefonso, Bulacan

Evaluation Form
COMPUTERIZE INVENTORY SYSTEM OF
BETHLEHEM MARIAN SCHOOL OF PULILAN

Name:__________________________________ Date:___________________
Age Gender Designation: ( ) Student
( ) below 20 years old ( ) Male ( ) Staff
( ) 20-30 years old ( ) Female ( ) IT Expert
( ) 31-40 years old
( ) 41-50 years old
( ) 51 years old and above

Instructions: Please evaluate the following by checking the box with the corresponding
value according to the degree of acceptability of the developed system.

4- Highly Accepted 3- Moderately 2-Slightly 1-Not Accepted

Accepted Accepted

Rating
Category
5 4 3 2 1
A. Performance

1. The system can easily provide search results from

a search query.
2. The system can easily print inventory reports.
3. The system response time is fast from the request
of the user.
4. The system can retrieve data on the database
quickly.
5. The information entered on the system are easily
added or updated in the list.
B. Usability
1. The system provides up-to-date information
regarding inventory.
2. The user saves effort in printing inventory reports.
3. The user can easily update item details.
 15

4. The user can easily find details about item in the

inventory.
5. The user can set details to be used in adding items in
the inventory.
C. Security
1. The system provides different access level account
for different user.
2. Features of the system that can be accessed depend
on the level of accessibility of the user.
3. Only the administrator can add and update inventory
items.
4. The system provides a list of user who logs in to the
system (user log history).
5. The system is being locked when user try to login
many times.
D. User-friendliness
1. All text fields are properly labeled and organized.
2. The system gives appropriate instructions.
3. The system gives appropriate warning messages in
any attempt to change or delete data.
4. The user can easily operate and navigate the system.
5. The user can easily understand the functions of
buttons and menus in the system.
E. Consistency
1. The system provides appropriate icons on every
buttons.
2. The system provides appropriate font size and font
style on all labels of the system.
3. Buttons are uniformly placed.
4. Print information is included in the inventory reports
to be printed.
5. Buttons and menus are properly linked

Comments/
Suggestions:_____________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________

__________________________
Signature
 16

G: Title Proposal

Project Title:

Proponents/ 1.
Researchers:
Objectives of the Study:

Scope of the Study:

Limitations of the
Study:

Project  Program Specification

Design/Development
Plan:

 Software Specification

 Hardware Specification

Noted By: Recommending Approval: Approved by:

Signature Signature Signature

PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME
IT 222 Subject Teacher Head, IT Department Dean, IEAT
____________________ ____________________ ____________________
Date Signed Date Signed Date Signed
 17

H: Adviser Nomination

Republic of the Philippines

BULACAN AGRICULTURAL STATE COLLEGE
San Ildefonso, Bulacan

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED TECHNOLOGY

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

CAPSTONE PROJECT ADVISER NOMINATION

I __________________________________, a Bachelor of Science in Information

(name of student)
Technology student hereby request ____________________________________ as my Capstone
(name of faculty member)
Project Adviser.

Conforme:

_________________________
(NAME OF FACULTY
Capstone Adviser

Noted:

(NAME OF HEAD)
_________________________
Head, IT Department

Approved:

(NAME OF INSTITUTE DEAN)

_________________________
Institute Dean
 18

I: Recommendation Sheet

(Panel Members during the final presentation are the following but not limited to

1) Programmer/ IT specialist 2) at least an MSIT/ MIT graduate faculty and 3) Quality

Control IT personnel, should not be part of the IT faculty within the institute)

Bulacan Agricultural State College

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology
Pinaod, San Ildefonso, Bulacan

RECOMMENDATION SHEET

CAPSTONE PROJECT TITLE:

PROECT CLIENT NAME: CONTACT #:

GROUP MEMBERS NAME CONTACT #: PROJECT GRADES
1.
2.
3.
DATE OF PRESENTATION TIME
LEAD PANELIST SIGNATURE
PANELIST SIGNATURE
PANELIST SIGNATURE
ADVISER SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION

 PASS WITH NO REVISION

 CONDITIONAL PASS WITH  To be checked by the Project Adviser
MINOR REVISIONS*  To be checked by the Panelists
 MAJOR REVISIONS --- With a re-demonstration of the project.
 FAILED**
**Indicate the names of students who failed (no listing means all members of the group):
Student Reason(s) for Failure Signature

Reason(s) for Failure (as a group):

 Incompleteness of the output
 Incorrectness of the output
 Non-original (copied from existing sources)
 Output(s) / deliverable(s) were made by individuals other than members of the group
 Others (specify):
Condition(s) of Failure:
  Change the entire project by submitting a new proposal for approval
 Continue working on the same topic including necessary revisions and requirements
 Others (specify): 19
J. Panelist List of Question Form

Bulacan Agricultural State College

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology
Pinaod, San Ildefonso, Bulacan

PANELIST LIST OF QUESTIONS FORM

Indicate the questions you intend to ask to the members of the project group. Questions
may include but are not limited to the project document contents, requirements, analysis, design
and programming of the software. Please indicate the short comments, which will serve as your
evaluation of the response(s) given to the question.

Questions Comments
 20
K: Project Presentation Evaluation Form

Bulacan Agricultural State College

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology
Pinaod, San Ildefonso, Bulacan

PROJECT PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

PROJECT TITLE

Project Group Name

Date of Presentation Time:
Panelist Name Signature
Contact #:

INSTRUCTION TO THE EVALUATOR

Place a check mark at the appropriate box given the following evaluation scores:
4 Outstanding
3 Exceeds Minimum Requirements Most of the Time
2 Meets Minimum Requirements
1 Meets Minimum Requirements Sometimes
0 Poor
EVALUATION CRITERIA
I. DOCUMENT 4 3 2 1 0
1) Correctness of the statement of the problem, current state, objectives and
theoretical framework
2) Clarity of defined requirements
3) Content and Organization
4) Correctness of the design and implementation issues with respect to the
theories used in the study
5) Presence of citations for non-original material and sufficiency of the list of
reference used
II. METHODOLOGY
6) Definition and application of the software development
7) Appropriateness of research, data gathering, and analysis tools utilized
8) Appropriateness of the chosen methodology
9) Adequacy of data gathered for the study
10) Adequacy, completeness, and effectiveness of diagrams, graphs, charts,
tables, and notations used
11) Appropriateness of research, data gathering, and analysis tools utilized
III. PRESENTATION
12) Clarity and Organization of presentation delivery
13) Adequacy of Visual Aids and other tools used for the presentation
14) Ability to answer questions analytically and convincingly
15) Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
16) Ability to discuss / revise program modules as required by the panel
members
IV. SOFTWARE
17) Executability of the software
18) Ease of Use / User friendliness
19) Ability to ensure data accuracy and validity
20) Effectiveness and efficiency of the software in meeting necessary user
requirements and objectives of the study
21) Completeness of software features / components / modules to meet user
requirements and objectives of the study
22) Completeness of software features / components / modules consistent with
existing systems similar to the study
23) Correctness and completeness of appropriate theories in the development
of the software
24) Consistency of design and implementation with the principles of software
development
25) Absence of errors
26) Result of the study 21
RATING (Total Score)

PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

This form is used to evaluate how each member of the group performed during defense.

INSTRUCTION TO THE EVALUATOR

Place a check mark at the appropriate box given the following evaluation scores:

4 Outstanding
3 Exceeds Minimum Requirements Most of the Time
2 Meets Minimum Requirements
1 Meets Minimum Requirements Sometimes
0 Poor

Group Member:
I. Communication Skills 4 3 2 1 0
1. Voice Projection (distance reached)
2. Voice Modulation (pleasantness of voice)
3. Diction/Pronunciation
4. Grammar/Syntax; Understandability
II. Work Organization
5. Preparedness
6. Ability to present the assigned topic(s) clearly
7. Participation in the defense
 III. Effectiveness
8. Ability to answer questions
9. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
Other Comment(s):
22
RATING (Total Score/36 x 100)
L: Revision List Form

Bulacan Agricultural State College

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology
Pinaod, San Ildefonso, Bulacan

REVISION LIST FORM

The following revisions need to be complied with by the project group. Further
evaluation on the project will be done depending on the indicated result in the Recommendation
Sheet

Panel Member’s signature over printed name

 23

M: Peer Evaluation Sheet

Bulacan Agricultural State College

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology
Pinaod, San Ildefonso, Bulacan

PEER EVALUATION SHEET

Student Name: Date:

Subject Code:

CAPSTONE PROJECT TITLE:

_______________________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA:
Group Oral Interaction with the Member’s Document
TOTAL
Members Group (5%) Section (5%)

TOTAL: ______________%
Panel Member: _______________________ Adviser: ________________
Signature over Printed Name
 24

N.: Summary Sheet for Oral Examination

 25

O: Acknowledgement Receipt

Bulacan Agricultural State College

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology
Pinaod, San Ildefonso, Bulacan

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT

This is to acknowledge receipt of one (1) copy of the manuscript of _______________________,

Name of Student
_________________ with Course
her capstone project entitled
_________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________.

Office Name Signature Date

__________ __________ __________ __________
__________ __________ __________ __________
__________ __________ __________ __________
__________ __________ __________ __________
__________ __________ __________ __________
__________ __________ __________ __________
__________ __________ __________ __________
__________ __________ __________ __________
 26

P: English Critic’s Certificate

Bulacan Agricultural State College

Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology
Pinaod, San Ildefonso, Bulacan

March 22, 2016

ENGLISH CRITIC’S CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the undersigned has reviewed and went through all

the sections of the Capstone Project study entitled “AUTOMATED PIGLET

FEEDER SYSTEM USING ELECTRONIC CONTROLLER BOARD FOR

BASC” parallel to the set of structural and grammarian rules that govern the

format of technical writing and composition of sentences, phrases and words in

the English language.

Signed:

MS. DESIREE A. RODRIGUEZ

English Critic

Conforme:

JUDE KEVIN T. GONZALES

KENNETH G. IGNACIO
GABRIEL C. SOLATORIO
Project Developers
 27

O: English Critic’s Personal Data Sheet

P: Curriculum Vitae of Developers

Q: Memorandum of Agreement/MOU/Letter of Acceptance

R: Other Relevant Documents