0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views17 pages

Ha01 - PP Test

The document reports the results of Phillips-Perron unit root tests on the variables LC and LE. For LC, the tests fail to reject the null hypothesis of a unit root at the 5% level when including only a constant, but do reject it when also including a time trend. For the first difference of LC, the null is rejected at the 1% level in both cases. Similarly for LE, the null is rejected for the first difference but not the level.

Uploaded by

thasan_1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views17 pages

Ha01 - PP Test

The document reports the results of Phillips-Perron unit root tests on the variables LC and LE. For LC, the tests fail to reject the null hypothesis of a unit root at the 5% level when including only a constant, but do reject it when also including a time trend. For the first difference of LC, the null is rejected at the 1% level in both cases. Similarly for LE, the null is rejected for the first difference but not the level.

Uploaded by

thasan_1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

PP TEST

LC, LEVEL, INTERCEPT

Null Hypothesis: LC has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 1 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -0.804707 0.8046


Test critical values: 1% level -3.646342
5% level -2.954021
10% level -2.615817

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.006181


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.004673

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LC)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 08:51
Sample (adjusted): 1972 2004
Included observations: 33 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

LC(-1) -0.117203 0.105475 -1.111191 0.2750


C 0.035649 0.028542 1.248984 0.2210

R-squared 0.038305 Mean dependent var 0.008086


Adjusted R-squared 0.007282 S.D. dependent var 0.081415
S.E. of regression 0.081118 Akaike info criterion -2.127138
Sum squared resid 0.203983 Schwarz criterion -2.036441
Log likelihood 37.09778 F-statistic 1.234745
Durbin-Watson stat 2.457698 Prob(F-statistic) 0.275030
LC, 1ST DIFF., INTERCEPT

Null Hypothesis: D(LC) has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 1 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -7.791338 0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -3.653730
5% level -2.957110
10% level -2.617434

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.005862


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.005710

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LC,2)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 08:53
Sample (adjusted): 1973 2004
Included observations: 32 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LC(-1)) -1.341139 0.172847 -7.759097 0.0000


C 0.010699 0.014023 0.762964 0.4514

R-squared 0.667419 Mean dependent var 0.002049


Adjusted R-squared 0.656333 S.D. dependent var 0.134883
S.E. of regression 0.079072 Akaike info criterion -2.176446
Sum squared resid 0.187573 Schwarz criterion -2.084837
Log likelihood 36.82313 F-statistic 60.20358
Durbin-Watson stat 1.917937 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
LC, LEVEL, INTERCEPT & TREND

Null Hypothesis: LC has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 1 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -2.973483 0.1544


Test critical values: 1% level -4.262735
5% level -3.552973
10% level -3.209642

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.004716


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.003791

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LC)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 08:57
Sample (adjusted): 1972 2004
Included observations: 33 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

LC(-1) -0.426636 0.137990 -3.091776 0.0043


C 0.007714 0.026943 0.286302 0.7766
@TREND(1971) 0.005924 0.001940 3.053242 0.0047

R-squared 0.266298 Mean dependent var 0.008086


Adjusted R-squared 0.217384 S.D. dependent var 0.081415
S.E. of regression 0.072024 Akaike info criterion -2.337126
Sum squared resid 0.155624 Schwarz criterion -2.201080
Log likelihood 41.56258 F-statistic 5.444256
Durbin-Watson stat 2.330212 Prob(F-statistic) 0.009612
LC, FIRST DIFF., INTERCEPT & TREND

Null Hypothesis: D(LC) has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 2 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -8.142398 0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -4.273277
5% level -3.557759
10% level -3.212361

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.005496


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.004983

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LC,2)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 08:58
Sample (adjusted): 1973 2004
Included observations: 32 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LC(-1)) -1.377959 0.172290 -7.997903 0.0000


C -0.025725 0.029650 -0.867636 0.3927
@TREND(1971) 0.002095 0.001509 1.388266 0.1756

R-squared 0.688144 Mean dependent var 0.002049


Adjusted R-squared 0.666637 S.D. dependent var 0.134883
S.E. of regression 0.077878 Akaike info criterion -2.178288
Sum squared resid 0.175884 Schwarz criterion -2.040876
Log likelihood 37.85262 F-statistic 31.99586
Durbin-Watson stat 1.970189 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
LE, LEVEL, INTERCEPT

Null Hypothesis: LE has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 6 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -1.164653 0.6777


Test critical values: 1% level -3.646342
5% level -2.954021
10% level -2.615817

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.004802


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.002826

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LE)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:03
Sample (adjusted): 1972 2004
Included observations: 33 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

LE(-1) -0.027596 0.025933 -1.064097 0.2955


C 0.237603 0.183694 1.293469 0.2054

R-squared 0.035239 Mean dependent var 0.042584


Adjusted R-squared 0.004117 S.D. dependent var 0.071647
S.E. of regression 0.071500 Akaike info criterion -2.379553
Sum squared resid 0.158479 Schwarz criterion -2.288855
Log likelihood 41.26262 F-statistic 1.132302
Durbin-Watson stat 2.204414 Prob(F-statistic) 0.295504
LE, 1ST DIFF., INTERCEPT

Null Hypothesis: D(LE) has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 4 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -6.268357 0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -3.653730
5% level -2.957110
10% level -2.617434

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.004950


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.003807

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LE,2)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:04
Sample (adjusted): 1973 2004
Included observations: 32 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LE(-1)) -1.145238 0.185854 -6.162041 0.0000


C 0.050827 0.015417 3.296828 0.0025

R-squared 0.558634 Mean dependent var -0.001705


Adjusted R-squared 0.543921 S.D. dependent var 0.107597
S.E. of regression 0.072664 Akaike info criterion -2.345472
Sum squared resid 0.158403 Schwarz criterion -2.253863
Log likelihood 39.52755 F-statistic 37.97075
Durbin-Watson stat 1.977020 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000001
LE, LEVEL, INTERCEPT & TREND

Null Hypothesis: LE has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 0 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -2.076628 0.5392


Test critical values: 1% level -4.262735
5% level -3.552973
10% level -3.209642

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.004273


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.004273

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LE)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:05
Sample (adjusted): 1972 2004
Included observations: 33 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

LE(-1) -0.335001 0.161320 -2.076628 0.0465


C 2.143451 1.003769 2.135402 0.0410
@TREND(1971) 0.015682 0.008131 1.928614 0.0633

R-squared 0.141660 Mean dependent var 0.042584


Adjusted R-squared 0.084437 S.D. dependent var 0.071647
S.E. of regression 0.068556 Akaike info criterion -2.435827
Sum squared resid 0.140997 Schwarz criterion -2.299781
Log likelihood 43.19115 F-statistic 2.475595
Durbin-Watson stat 1.836100 Prob(F-statistic) 0.101132
LE, FIRST DIFF., INTERCEPT & TREND

Null Hypothesis: D(LE) has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 7 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -6.747230 0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -4.273277
5% level -3.557759
10% level -3.212361

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.004765


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.002491

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LE,2)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:05
Sample (adjusted): 1973 2004
Included observations: 32 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LE(-1)) -1.157435 0.185812 -6.229054 0.0000


C 0.077243 0.029242 2.641533 0.0132
@TREND(1971) -0.001478 0.001391 -1.062258 0.2969

R-squared 0.575164 Mean dependent var -0.001705


Adjusted R-squared 0.545865 S.D. dependent var 0.107597
S.E. of regression 0.072509 Akaike info criterion -2.321144
Sum squared resid 0.152470 Schwarz criterion -2.183731
Log likelihood 40.13830 F-statistic 19.63082
Durbin-Watson stat 2.033138 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000004
LY, LEVEL, INTERCEPT

Null Hypothesis: LY has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 1 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -1.368575 0.5855


Test critical values: 1% level -3.646342
5% level -2.954021
10% level -2.615817

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.001386


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.001568

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LY)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:19
Sample (adjusted): 1972 2004
Included observations: 33 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

LY(-1) -0.024787 0.017470 -1.418784 0.1659


C 0.231781 0.135488 1.710712 0.0971

R-squared 0.060975 Mean dependent var 0.039787


Adjusted R-squared 0.030683 S.D. dependent var 0.039018
S.E. of regression 0.038415 Akaike info criterion -3.622049
Sum squared resid 0.045747 Schwarz criterion -3.531352
Log likelihood 61.76382 F-statistic 2.012949
Durbin-Watson stat 1.727317 Prob(F-statistic) 0.165938
LY, 1ST DIFF., INTERCEPT

Null Hypothesis: D(LY) has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 2 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -4.636990 0.0008


Test critical values: 1% level -3.653730
5% level -2.957110
10% level -2.617434

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.001462


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.001286

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LY,2)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:20
Sample (adjusted): 1973 2004
Included observations: 32 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LY(-1)) -0.838453 0.179046 -4.682888 0.0001


C 0.032613 0.009945 3.279302 0.0026

R-squared 0.422293 Mean dependent var -0.000552


Adjusted R-squared 0.403036 S.D. dependent var 0.051119
S.E. of regression 0.039496 Akaike info criterion -3.564777
Sum squared resid 0.046798 Schwarz criterion -3.473169
Log likelihood 59.03643 F-statistic 21.92944
Durbin-Watson stat 1.958012 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000057
LY, LEVEL, INTERCEPT & TREND

Null Hypothesis: LY has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 2 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -2.153647 0.4984


Test critical values: 1% level -4.262735
5% level -3.552973
10% level -3.209642

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.001255


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.001559

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LY)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:21
Sample (adjusted): 1972 2004
Included observations: 33 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

LY(-1) -0.220046 0.111367 -1.975860 0.0574


C 1.609231 0.787519 2.043418 0.0499
@TREND(1971) 0.007941 0.004477 1.773824 0.0862

R-squared 0.150112 Mean dependent var 0.039787


Adjusted R-squared 0.093453 S.D. dependent var 0.039018
S.E. of regression 0.037150 Akaike info criterion -3.661182
Sum squared resid 0.041404 Schwarz criterion -3.525135
Log likelihood 63.40950 F-statistic 2.649388
Durbin-Watson stat 1.579744 Prob(F-statistic) 0.087181
LY, FIRST DIFF., INTERCEPT & TREND

Null Hypothesis: D(LY) has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 1 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -4.715023 0.0034


Test critical values: 1% level -4.273277
5% level -3.557759
10% level -3.212361

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.001432


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.001449

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LY,2)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:21
Sample (adjusted): 1973 2004
Included observations: 32 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LY(-1)) -0.869955 0.184713 -4.709759 0.0001


C 0.044493 0.018244 2.438787 0.0211
@TREND(1971) -0.000608 0.000780 -0.778925 0.4423

R-squared 0.434132 Mean dependent var -0.000552


Adjusted R-squared 0.395106 S.D. dependent var 0.051119
S.E. of regression 0.039757 Akaike info criterion -3.522983
Sum squared resid 0.045839 Schwarz criterion -3.385570
Log likelihood 59.36772 F-statistic 11.12434
Durbin-Watson stat 1.943943 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000260
LT, LEVEL, INTERCEPT

Null Hypothesis: LT has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 4 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic 0.347975 0.9774


Test critical values: 1% level -3.646342
5% level -2.954021
10% level -2.615817

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.003821


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.002906

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LT)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:22
Sample (adjusted): 1972 2004
Included observations: 33 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

LT(-1) 0.004342 0.018734 0.231767 0.8182


C -0.019170 0.316813 -0.060509 0.9521

R-squared 0.001730 Mean dependent var 0.054212


Adjusted R-squared -0.030472 S.D. dependent var 0.062825
S.E. of regression 0.063775 Akaike info criterion -2.608217
Sum squared resid 0.126085 Schwarz criterion -2.517519
Log likelihood 45.03557 F-statistic 0.053716
Durbin-Watson stat 1.900847 Prob(F-statistic) 0.818242
LT, 1ST DIFF., INTERCEPT

Null Hypothesis: D(LT) has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 7 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -5.908606 0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -3.653730
5% level -2.957110
10% level -2.617434

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.003471


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.002912

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LT,2)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:23
Sample (adjusted): 1973 2004
Included observations: 32 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LT(-1)) -1.016699 0.173918 -5.845854 0.0000


C 0.058877 0.014086 4.179716 0.0002

R-squared 0.532521 Mean dependent var 0.005711


Adjusted R-squared 0.516938 S.D. dependent var 0.087551
S.E. of regression 0.060851 Akaike info criterion -2.700329
Sum squared resid 0.111084 Schwarz criterion -2.608721
Log likelihood 45.20527 F-statistic 34.17401
Durbin-Watson stat 1.988742 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000002
LT, LEVEL, INTERCEPT & TREND

Null Hypothesis: LT has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 1 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -2.578249 0.2918


Test critical values: 1% level -4.262735
5% level -3.552973
10% level -3.209642

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.003121


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.003487

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LT)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:23
Sample (adjusted): 1972 2004
Included observations: 33 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

LT(-1) -0.278621 0.110497 -2.521524 0.0172


C 4.459966 1.752099 2.545498 0.0163
@TREND(1971) 0.017828 0.006877 2.592468 0.0146

R-squared 0.184440 Mean dependent var 0.054212


Adjusted R-squared 0.130069 S.D. dependent var 0.062825
S.E. of regression 0.058597 Akaike info criterion -2.749759
Sum squared resid 0.103008 Schwarz criterion -2.613713
Log likelihood 48.37102 F-statistic 3.392260
Durbin-Watson stat 1.727668 Prob(F-statistic) 0.046972
LT, FIRST DIFF., INTERCEPT & TREND

Null Hypothesis: D(LT) has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 7 (Newey-West using Bartlett kernel)

Adj. t-Stat Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -5.792062 0.0002


Test critical values: 1% level -4.273277
5% level -3.557759
10% level -3.212361

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction) 0.003471


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 0.002911

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(LT,2)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/15/10 Time: 09:24
Sample (adjusted): 1973 2004
Included observations: 32 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(LT(-1)) -1.017052 0.177197 -5.739656 0.0000


C 0.058195 0.024785 2.347951 0.0259
@TREND(1971) 4.00E-05 0.001187 0.033735 0.9733

R-squared 0.532539 Mean dependent var 0.005711


Adjusted R-squared 0.500301 S.D. dependent var 0.087551
S.E. of regression 0.061890 Akaike info criterion -2.637869
Sum squared resid 0.111079 Schwarz criterion -2.500456
Log likelihood 45.20590 F-statistic 16.51866
Durbin-Watson stat 1.988282 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000016

You might also like