7.2 Trigonometric Integrals
7.2 Trigonometric Integrals
2 Trigonometric Integrals
Dr K
and
d
sin x = cos x (2)
dx
and
d
sin x = cos x (2)
dx
Solution
Simply substituting u = cos x isn’t helpful, since then
du = − sin x dx.
Solution
Simply substituting u = cos x isn’t helpful, since then
du = − sin x dx.
In order to integrate powers of cosine, we would need an extra
sin x factor.
Solution
Simply substituting u = cos x isn’t helpful, since then
du = − sin x dx.
In order to integrate powers of cosine, we would need an extra
sin x factor. Similarly, a power of sine would require an extra
cos x factor.
Solution
Simply substituting u = cos x isn’t helpful, since then
du = − sin x dx.
In order to integrate powers of cosine, we would need an extra
sin x factor. Similarly, a power of sine would require an extra
cos x factor.
Thus here we can separate one cosine factor and convert the
remaining cos2 x factor to an expression involving sine using
the identity sin2 x + cos2 x = 1
Solution:
We could convert cos2 x to 1 − sin2 x,
Solution:
We could convert cos2 x to 1 − sin2 x, but we would be left
with an expression in terms of sin x with no extra cos x factor.
Solution:
We could convert cos2 x to 1 − sin2 x, but we would be left
with an expression in terms of sin x with no extra cos x factor.
Instead, we separate a single sine factor and rewrite the
remaining sin4 x factor in terms of cos x:
Solution:
We could convert cos2 x to 1 − sin2 x, but we would be left
with an expression in terms of sin x with no extra cos x factor.
Instead, we separate a single sine factor and rewrite the
remaining sin4 x factor in terms of cos x:
sin5 x cos2 x = (sin2 x)2 cos2 x sin x = (1 − cos2 x)2 cos2 x sin x
1 1
∴ sin2 x = (1 − cos 2x) and cos2 x = (1 + cos 2x)
2 2
SOLUTION
If we write sin2 x = 1 − cos2 x,
SOLUTION
If we write sin2 x = 1 − cos2 x, the integral is no simpler to
evaluate.
SOLUTION
If we write sin2 x = 1 − cos2 x, the integral is no simpler to
evaluate. Using the half-angle formula for sin2 x, however, we
have
Z π
1 π
Z
2
sin x dx = (1 − cos 2x) dx
0 2 0
SOLUTION
If we write sin2 x = 1 − cos2 x, the integral is no simpler to
evaluate. Using the half-angle formula for sin2 x, however, we
have
Z π
1 π
Z
2
sin x dx = (1 − cos 2x) dx
0 2 0
1 1
π
= 2 x − 2 sin 2x
0
SOLUTION
If we write sin2 x = 1 − cos2 x, the integral is no simpler to
evaluate. Using the half-angle formula for sin2 x, however, we
have
Z π
1 π
Z
2
sin x dx = (1 − cos 2x) dx
0 2 0
1 1
π
= 2 x − 2 sin 2x
0
1
= 2
(π − 12 sin 2π) − 12 (0 − 12 sin 0) = 12 π
SOLUTION
If we write sin2 x = 1 − cos2 x, the integral is no simpler to
evaluate. Using the half-angle formula for sin2 x, however, we
have
Z π
1 π
Z
2
sin x dx = (1 − cos 2x) dx
0 2 0
1 1
π
= 2 x − 2 sin 2x
0
1
= 2
(π − 12 sin 2π) − 12 (0 − 12 sin 0) = 12 π
SOLUTION
We evaluate this exercise as the previous one by using half
angle identity by first writing sin4 x = (sin2 x)2
SOLUTION
We evaluate this exercise as the previous one by using half
angle identity by first writing sin4 x = (sin2 x)2 and use a
half-angle formula:
Z Z
4
sin x dx = (sin2 x)2 dx
SOLUTION
We evaluate this exercise as the previous one by using half
angle identity by first writing sin4 x = (sin2 x)2 and use a
half-angle formula:
Z Z
4
sin x dx = (sin2 x)2 dx
Z 2
1
= · (1 − cos 2x) dx
2
SOLUTION
We evaluate this exercise as the previous one by using half
angle identity by first writing sin4 x = (sin2 x)2 and use a
half-angle formula:
Z Z
4
sin x dx = (sin2 x)2 dx
Z 2
1
= · (1 − cos 2x) dx
Z 2
1
1 − 2 cos 2x + cos2 2x dx
=
4
sec2 x = 1 + tan2 x
sec2 x = 1 + tan2 x
Or, since
d
sec x = sec x tan x,
dx
sec2 x = 1 + tan2 x
Or, since
d
sec x = sec x tan x,
dx
we can separate a sec x tan x factor and convert the remaining
(even) power of tangent to secant.
u7 u9
= + +C
7 9
u7 u9
= + +C
7 9
1 1
= tan7 x + tan9 x + C
7 9
Dr K §7.2 Trigonometric Integrals
Just like the relationships between sin x and cos x enable us to
simplify integrals that contain combinations of powers of sin x
and cos x,
and
d
tan x = sec2 x (2)
dx
and
d
sec x = sec x tan x (3)
dx
SOLUTION
If we keep sec θ tan θ to use as the differential then the
remaining powers are both even,
SOLUTION
If we keep sec θ tan θ to use as the differential then the
remaining powers are both even, meaning we can use the
square relationships.
Z
= (u 10 − 2u 8 + u 6 ) du
Z
= (u 10 − 2u 8 + u 6 ) du
1 11 2 9 1 7
= u − u + u +C
11 9 7
Z
= (u 10 − 2u 8 + u 6 ) du
1 11 2 9 1 7
= u − u + u +C
11 9 7
1 2 1
= sec θ − sec9 θ + sec7 θ + C
11
11 9 7
Z
sec x dx = ln | sec x + tan x| + C (8)
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral.
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx,
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx, so that won’t
work.
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx, so that won’t
work. Next we convert the sec2 x to 1 − tan2 x.
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx, so that won’t
work. Next we convert the sec2 x to 1 − tan2 x.
But then we have to make u = tan x and then du = sec2 x,
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx, so that won’t
work. Next we convert the sec2 x to 1 − tan2 x.
But then we have to make u = tan x and then du = sec2 x,
and we only have one factor of sec x left.
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx, so that won’t
work. Next we convert the sec2 x to 1 − tan2 x.
But then we have to make u = tan x and then du = sec2 x,
and we only have one factor of sec x left.
So this method will not work here.
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx, so that won’t
work. Next we convert the sec2 x to 1 − tan2 x.
But then we have to make u = tan x and then du = sec2 x,
and we only have one factor of sec x left.
So this method will not work here. Instead we have to use
integration by parts, as follows:
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx, so that won’t
work. Next we convert the sec2 x to 1 − tan2 x.
But then we have to make u = tan x and then du = sec2 x,
and we only have one factor of sec x left.
So this method will not work here. Instead we have to use
integration by parts, as follows:
Let
u = sec x dv = sec2 x dx
SOLUTION
Suppose we try to use our relationships above to solve this
integral. So we write sec3 x as sec2 x sec x.
If we make u = sec x then du = sec x tan x dx, so that won’t
work. Next we convert the sec2 x to 1 − tan2 x.
But then we have to make u = tan x and then du = sec2 x,
and we only have one factor of sec x left.
So this method will not work here. Instead we have to use
integration by parts, as follows:
Let
u = sec x dv = sec2 x dx
du = sec x tan x dx v = tan x
Dr K §7.2 Trigonometric Integrals
Then
Z Z
sec x dx = sec x tan x − sec x tan2 x dx
3
Z and finally:
3 1
sec x dx = sec x tan x + ln | sec x + tan x| + C
2
Z and finally:
3 1
sec x dx = sec x tan x + ln | sec x + tan x| + C
2
1 1
= sec x tan x + ln | sec x + tan x| + C1 i.e. C1 = C
2 2
Dr K §7.2 Trigonometric Integrals
we can make use of another set of trigonometric identities:
SOLUTION
This integral could be evaluated using integration by parts, but
it’s easier to use the identity above as follows:
SOLUTION
This integral could be evaluated using integration by parts, but
it’s
Z easier to use the identity
Z above as follows:
1
sin 4x cos 5x dx = [sin(−x) + sin 9x] dx
2
SOLUTION
This integral could be evaluated using integration by parts, but
it’s
Z easier to use the identity
Z above as follows:
1
sin 4x cos 5x dx = [sin(−x) + sin 9x] dx
Z2
1
= (− sin x + sin 9x) dx
2
SOLUTION
This integral could be evaluated using integration by parts, but
it’s
Z easier to use the identity
Z above as follows:
1
sin 4x cos 5x dx = [sin(−x) + sin 9x] dx
Z2
1
= (− sin x + sin 9x) dx
2
1 1
= (cos x − cos 9x) + C
2 9