0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 36 views42 pagesINTAX
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Jt
Fundamental Principles
Taxation Defined
Taxation is the process or means by
which the sovereign (independent State),
through its law-making body (the legislature),
imposes burdens upon subjects and objects
within its jurisdiction for the purpose of raising
revenues to carry out the legitimate objects of
government. In simple terms, it is the act of
levying a tax to apportion the cost of
government among those who, in some
measure, are privileged to enjoy its benefits
and must therefore bear its burdens. It is a
power inherent in every sovereign State being
essential to the existence of every
government. Hence, even if not mentioned in
the constitution, the State can still exercise
the power. Therefore, any constitutional
provision regarding the State's power to tax
should not be interpreted as a “grant of
power”, but merely a limitation on the State’s
power to tax. Taxes, on the other hand, are
the enforced proportional contributions or
charges from persons and property levied by
the law-making body of the State by virtue of
its sovereignty for the support of the
government and all public needs.
Under American Jurisprudence,
the power to tax Is considered
inherent in a sovereign State
because it is 4 necessary
attribute of sovereignty. Without
this power no sovereign State
can exist or endure. The power to
tax proceeds upon the theory that
the existence of a government is
a necessity and this power Is an
essential and inherent attribute of
sovereignty, belonging as a
matter of right to every
independent State or
goverment. No sovereign State
can continue to exist without the
means to pay its expenses; and
that for those means, it has the
fight to compel all citizens and
property within its limits to
contribute, hence, the emergence
of the power to tax. (51 Am.
Jur., Taxation 40),Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of the Philippines, Inc. v. Municipality of
Tanauan, Leyte, G.R. No. L-31156, February 27,1976
ISSUE:
Whether a legislative body may enact laws to raise revenues in the absence of
a constitutional provision granting said body the power to tax.
ANSWER:
Yes, the legislative body may enact laws even in the absence of a
constitutional provision because the power to tax is inherent in the government
and not merely a constitutional grant. The power of taxation is an essential and
inherent attribute of sovereignty belonging as a matter of right to every
independent government without being expressly granted by the people.
The Three (3) Inherent Powers of the State
4. Police Power. \tis the power of the State for promoting public welfare by
restraining and regulating the use of liberty and property. It may be
exercise only by the government. The property taken in the exercise of
this power is destroyed because it is noxious or intended for a noxious
purpose.
2. Power of Taxation. \tis the power by which the State raises revenue to
defray the necessary expenses of the government.
3. Power of Eminent Domain. It is the power of the State to acquire private
property for public purpose upon payment of just compensation.
Meaning of “INHERENT Power”
= Builtin, inbom, ingrained
= Existing in something as a permanent, essential, or characteristic attribute.
= Vested in someone (i.e., State or government) as a tight or privilege.
Similarities among the three (3) Inherent powers of the State
They are inherent in the State.
Me} exist independently of the Constitution although the conditions for
eir exercise may be prescribed by the Constitution.
Ways by which the State Inte i i i
ys by terfere with .
Legislative in nature and character. pores tee prone
Presuppose an equi i indi
quivalent compen: i i directly,
by the persons affected. pensation received, directly or int y;
Ae
2.
apeERD)
TAXATION
Power to enforce
contributions to raise
gov't funds.
4, Nature
2. Authority Government only
“
3, Purpose
For the support of the
gover nment
Community or a class of
individuals. Applies to
all persons, property and
excises that may be
subject thereto
4, Persons
affected
4, Scope Plenary, comprehensive,
supreme
5. Effect Contribution becomes
part of public fund
6. Benefits In form of protection and
received benefits received from
government
7.Amount No limit
C lo limit
imposition
ISTINCTIONS AMONG prema eed Ou ueeivon Mes
Chapter ¢ Findamental Principles
POLICE POWER
Power to make and
implement laws for the
general welfare
EMINENT DOMAIN
Power to take private
property for public use
with just compensation.
Government only May be granted to public
service/utility companies
Promotion of general The taking of private
welfare through property for public use.
regulation
Community or a class of On an individual as the
individuals. owner of personal
property.
Only particular property
is comprehended
Applies to all persons,
property and excises that
may be subject thereto.
Merely a power to take
private property for
public use.
Broader in application.
General power to make
and implement law.
No transfer or title. There
may just be a restraint on
the injurious use of
property.
There is a transfer of title
to property.
No direct and immediate
benefit but only such as
may arise from the
maintenance of a healthy
economic. standard of
society.
Market value of property
taken.
Sufficient to cover cost of
the license and the
necessary expenses of
police surveillance and
regulation.
No imposition. The
owner is paid equivalent
to the fair value of his
propertyCNdster € ~ lLutdanental Pring
ry
Set to Tax — Government only
2 Police Power — Government only
3. Eminent Domain | ,
0 May be granted to public service/utility companies
© Example: Eminent domain granted to Manila Water under RA
11601 dated December 10, 2021, as follows:
Section 12. Right of Eminent Domain. - Subject to the limitations and Procedures
prescribed by law, the grantee, its successors or assignees,
exercise the power of eminent domain insofar as it may be reason: ly
for_the efficient _ establishment, improvement. upgrading. rehabilitation,
maintenance, and operation of services. The grantee is authorized to install and
maintain its water pipelines and other facilities over, under, and across Public
property, including streets, highways, parks, and other similar property of the
Government of the Philippines, its branches, or any of its instrumentalities. The
grantee may acquire private property as is actually necessary for the realization of
the purposes for which this franchise is granted, including pipelines, buildings,
infrastructure, machineries, and equipment Previously, currently, or actually used.
or intended to be used, or have been abandoned, unused, or underutilized, or
which obstructs its facilities, for the operation of a waterworks and sewerage
system for the conveyance of water supply and sewerage services to end-users in
its service area’ Provided, That expropriation proceedings before the proper court
Shail have been instituted and just compensation paid
PURPOSES OF TAXATION
1. Primary: Revenue or Fiscal Purpose
The primary purpose of taxation on the part of the government is to
Provide funds or property with which to Promote the general welfare and
the protection of its citizens and to enable it to finance its multifarious
activities. A government can run its administrative set up only through
Public funding which is Collected in the form of tax.
Examples of taxes imposed for raising revenues are income and business
faxes.
Secondary: Regulatory Purpose (or Sumptuary/Compensatory)
Si While the primary purpose of taxation is to raise revenue for the
cae of the government, taxation is often employed as a devise for
‘gulation or contro{ (implementation of State’s Police power) by means of
which certain effect: ‘onditi at
achieved such a iS Or conditions envisioned by the government may bea) Promotion
Chapler © ~ EUMg Qn“ o£ J co
of General Welfare
jh) Reduction of Social Inequality
o Economic Growth
Examples of Taxes *
imposed for
regulation
Excise taxes for sin products such as cigarettes
and alcohols
« Amusement taxes for “amusement places” such
as night and day clubs, cockpits and racetracks
of means * Increasing taxes in periods of prosperity to curb
en ari some spending power and halt inflation. ,
social OF economic * Granting tax incentives to promote new/pioneer
objectives through industries and encourage growth of local
taxation industries. ;
= Lowering taxes in case of economic breakdown
due to pandemic such as the Covid19 pandemic
(ie. CREATE Law signed by the President on
March 26, 2021)
RELATED CALTEX V. COMMISSIONER, 208 SCRA 755
CASES “Taxation is no longer a measure merely to raise revenue to support the
existence of the government. Taxes may be levied with a regulatory purpose
to provide means for the rehabilitation and stabilization of a threatened
industry which is affected with public interest as to be within the police power
of the State. The oil industry is imbued with public interest as it vitally affects
general welfare” |
TIOV. VIDEOGRAM, 151 SCRA 208 \
PD1987 which created the Videogram Regulatory Board also imposed a
30% tax on the gross receipts payable to the local goverment. The
Supreme Court upheld the validity of the law ruling that the 30% tax also
served a regulatory purpose to answer the need for regulating the video
industry, particularly the rampant film piracy, the flagrant violation of
intellectual property rights, and the proliferation of pornographic video tapes. |i" = a Ps
Chapter 1 - £ undamental L “incipl
OF TAXATION
SIS
THEORY and BASIS or oD THEORY and/or NECESSITY THEORY
Theory (Authority): Li
The power of taxation proceeds upon the theory that the existence of
government is a necessity (‘Necessity theory ). As stated in the case of
Phil, Guaranty Co., Inc. v. Commissioner [13 SCRA 775], is a power
predicated upon necessity. It is a necessary burden to preserve the State's
sovereignty and a means to give the citizenry an army to resist aggression, a
navy to defend its shores from invasion, a corps of civil servants to serve,
public improvements for the enjoyment of the citizenry, and those which come
within the State's territory and facilities and protection which a government is
supposed to provide.
The power of taxation is essential because the government can neither
exist nor endure without taxation. “Taxes are the lifeblood of the government
and their prompt and certain availability is an imperious need” (Lifeblood
Doctrine). The government cannot continue to perform its basic functions of
serving and protecting its people without means to pay its expenses.
Consequently, the State has the right to compel all its citizens and property
within its limits to contribute.
| RELATED COMMISSIONER v. ALGUE
CASES
The Supreme Court held that taxes are the lifeblood of the
| government and should be collected without unnecessary hindrance
- They are what we pay for a civilized society. Without taxes, the government
| would be paralyzed for lack of motive power to activate and operate it. The
government, for its part, is expected to respond in the form of tangible and
intangible benefits intended to improve the lives of the people and enhance
their moral and material values.
PHIL. GUARANTEE CO., INC. v CIR, 13 SCRA 775
The power to tax is an attribute of sovereignty. It is a power emanating
| from necessity. It is a necessary burden to preserve the State's sovereignty
and a means to give the citizenry an army to resist an aggression, @ navy bo
| defend its shores ftom invasion, a corps of civil servants to serve, puble
| improvements designed for the enjoyment of the citizenry and those wich
| come within the State's territory, and facilities and protection which @
government is supposed to provide. Considering that the reinsurance
premiums in question were afforded protection by the government and he
recipient foreign reinsurers exercised rights and privileges guaranteed By o%
laws, such reinsurance premiums and reinsurers should share the burden
———_____Maintaining the State.Chipte 7 - Fundamental’ Princisl
ciple
gasis of Taxation: BENEFITS RECEIVED or RECIPROCITY THEORY
is is the reciprocal duties of protection and support between the
The is inhabitants. The State collects taxes from the subjects of
sete in order that it may be able to perform the functions of government.
tax izens, on the other hand, pay taxes in order that they may be secured
The citizens, on tf” Oe benefits of organized society. This theory spawned the
it men
ne hi Symbiotic Relationship which means, taxes are what we pay for a
civilized society (Commissioner v. Algue).
i it tion the State
xpayers receive benefits from taxes through the protect
Piet D hem. For the protection they get arises their obligation to support
the government through payment of taxes. (CIR v. Algue, Inc., G.R. No. L-
78896, February 17, 1988, 158 SCRA 9)
TABLE 1-2:
Doctrine of Symbiotic Relationship or PP eae ke cco
Every person who is able to, must
contribute his share in the running of the
government by paying taxes.
In return for the contributions made, the
taxpayers receive the general advantages
and protection in the form of tangible or
intangible benefits intended to improve the
lives of the people and enhanced their
material and moral values which the
government affords the taxpayer and his
property.C)
am - f,
Chapter 7 + Fundamental lin
HE LIFEBLOOD THEORY:
eS ae coppel against the Government.”
2) hat in the performance of its governmental functions,
7 mee stato cannot be estopped by the neglect of its agents/officers,
. Enoneoile application and enforcement of law by public officers do
not block the subsequent correct application of statutes.
b) Collection of taxes cannot be enjoined (stopped) by injunction,
Under section 218 of the Tax
Code (as amended), no court, except Taxes are
the (Cour of Tax Appeals (through Jes a fe Ite
administrative remedies when collection Thus, it should be
could jeopardize the interest of the collected without
government or taxpayer - Section 11, unnecessary delay. Its
RA 1125), shall have the authority to collection, however.
grant an injunction to restrain the should not be tainted
collection of any national internal with arbitrariness,
revenue tax, fee or charge imposed by
the tax code.
This prohibition shall apply to all collection activities, including
imposition and collection of taxes, issuance of warrants of distraint and
garnishment, and/or levy on final decisions of the BIR on disputed
assessments, cases filed before the CTA, and the sale of property
distrained or garnished (RMO 42-2010).
Taxes could not be the subject of compensation or set-off.
Taxes cannot be subject to set-off or compensation since claim
for taxes is not a debt or contract, A distinguishing feature of a tax is that
it is compulsory rather than a matter of bargain. If taxes could be 2
abuse, depriving the government of authority over the manner by which
taxpayers can credit and offset their tax liabilities.
In the case of Republic vs. Mambulao Lumber Co. (6 SCRA 622;
Caltex Phils. vs. COA-208 SCRA 726), the no set-off rule also states that
faxes are not subject to set-off or legal compensation because the
government and the taxpayer are not mutual creditor and debtor of each
other. An exception to the rule is where both the claims of the
government and the taxpayer against each other have already become
due, demandable and fully liquidated. In this case, compensation taxes
Place by operation of law and both obligations are extinguished to thei
concurrent amounts (Domingo v. Garlitos, 8 SCRA 443).
8my - 2,
Chapter t - Fundamental Urinciple
“RELATED (FRANCIA VS. IAC. G.R 76749, June 28. 1988) ~
CASES xis the owner of a residential lot situated at Quirino Avenue, Pasay City. |
Tho lot has an area of 300 square meters. On June 1, 1994, 100 square
sinters of said lot ovmed by X vas expropriated by the government to be
rd inthe widening of Quirino Avenue, for P300,000.00 representing
the estimated assessed value of said portion, From 1991 to 1996, X, who
ig a businessman, has not been paying his income taxes. X is now being
| assessed for the unpaid income taxes in the total amount of
| 150,000.00. X claims his income tax liability has already been
| compensated by the amount of P300.000 which the government owes
him for the expropriation of his property. Decide.
| ANSWER: The income tax lability of X cannot be compensated with
the amount owed by the Goverment as compensation for his property
expropriated, taxes are of distint kind, essence and nature than ordinary
| Sbigations. | Taxes and debts cannot be the subject of compensation
pecause the Government and X are not mutually creditors and debtors of
each other and a claim for taxes is not a debt, demand, contract, or
judgment as is allowable to be set off
PHILEX MINING CORI IR, GR NO. 125704, Auf. 29, 1998)
May a taxpayer who has pending claims for VAT input credit or
refund, set-off said claims against his other tax liabilities?
ANSWER: No. Set-off is available only if both obligations are liquidated
and demandable. Liquidated debts are those where the exact amounts
have already been determined. In the instant case, the claim of the
taxpayer for VAT refund is still pending and the amount has still to be
determined. The liquidated obligation of the taxpayer to the government
cannot, therefore, be set-off against the unliquidated claim which the
_____ taxpayer conceived to exist in his favor.
4) Right to select objects (subjects) of taxation
The power to tax is essentially legislative i i
C _ gislative in nature. Hence, the right
eaecue objects/subjects of taxation rests with the Congress. The
Me in the competence of the legislature include the determination
1) The subject or object to be taxed
) The purpose of th
e tax as long as it is i
2 The amount or rate of the ae Mere ate
) Kind of tax :e
f - FP }.,
Chapter 1 ~ Eanda mental Princisle,
f
5) Apportionment of the tax
6) Situs of taxation . .
7) The manner, means, and agencies of collection of the tax.
A valid tax may result in the destruction of the taxpayer's
property.
The power to tax includes the “power to destroy”, where the
tax is a valid tax. This is so because a taxpayer could not seek the
nullification of the valid tax solely upon the premise that the tax will
impoverish him. Likewise, the exercise of the power to tax is “not
destructive of taxpayer’s property” where it is an invalid tax, which violates
the inherent or constitutional limitations. This is so because there is a
sympathetic court that shall come to the succor of the taxpayer and
declare such tax as invalid.
| RELATED — ROXAS vs. CTA (23 SCRA 276) _
| CASE
“The power to tax is viewed as the power to destroy in the sense that a
lawful tax cannot be defeated just because its exercise would be
destructive or would bring about insolvency to a taxpayer An
imposition of lawful regulatory taxes would be destructive to the
taxpayers and business. establishments because the government can
compel payment of tax and forfeiture of property through the exercise
| of police power’. —_ _|
In McCulloh v. Maryland, U.S. Chief Justice Marshall declared
that the power to tax involves the power to destroy. This maxim only
means that the power to tax includes the power to regulate even to the
extent of prohibition or destruction of businesses. The reason is that the
legislature has the inherent power to determine who to tax, what to tax
and how much tax is to be imposed. Pursuant to the regulatory purpose of
taxation, the legislature may impose tax in order to discourage or prohibit
things or enterprises inimical to the public welfare. For instance, the
legislature's imposition of prohibitive sin tax on cigarettes is congruent
with its purpose of discouraging the public form smoking cigarettes which
are hazardous to health.
SCOPE of the Power to Tax
In the case of Sison vs. Ancheta (130 SCRA 654), the Supreme Court
held that the power of taxation is the most absolute of all powers of a
government. It has the broadest scope of all the powers of the governme!
10“~ 7 = Fxg yp
Chapter 7 - Fundamental Principle
ce of limitations, it is considered as comprehensive’
in the absent
it
because plenary and supreme.
unlimited,
Comprehensive — as it covers persons, businesses, activities,
a.
professions, rights and privileges.
In the absence of limitations prescribed by law or the
constitution, the power to tax is unlimited and comprehensive. Its
force is so searching to the extent that the courts scarcely venture to
declare that it is subject to restrictions.
b. Unlimited —
c. Plenary — as itis complete; the BIR may avail of certain remedies to
ensure collection of taxes.
d. Supreme - in so far as the selection of the subject of taxation.
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF TAX
a. Itis an enforced contribution. Payment of tax is not voluntary payment or
donation, but an enforced contribution, exacted pursuant to legislative
authority.
b. It is generally payable in money. tis a pecuniary burden payable in
money which must be in legal tender.
c. It is proportionate in character. Payment of taxes should be based on the
ability to pay theory or theoretical justice. The use of a graduated tax
rates is in consonance with this rule.
4. It is levied on persons, property, or the exercise of a right or privil
Ie 5 i > lege
(subjects or objects of taxation). 8 p 8
Itis levied by the law-making bod i i
i ly of the State. The power of “imposing”
es ee eete aay legislative function. Congress cannot delegate such.
~ This limitation arises from the doctrine of separati
among the three branches of the government. een inoue
Itis levied for Public purpose
11C eptir 7 - Landanental Prin y
ofp
Aspects refer to “stages or phases” that are included or embodied in the
term “taxation” such as:
ASPECTS OF TAXATION
1. Levying or imposition of the tax which is a legislative act or function.
2. Assessment or determination of the correct amount of applicable tax.
3. Collection of the tax levied which is essentially administrative in character,
The national agency charged with the function of collecting interna
revenue taxes is the Bureau of Internal Revenue.
A eS aKa Seu)
ee
3. Collection 1. Levying
(Executive Function) (Legislative Function)
2. Assessment
(Executive Function)
NATURE/CHARACTERISTICS of the State’s Power to Tax
Itis inherent in sovereignty.
The State, having sovereignty, can enforce contribution (tax) even in the
absence of a constitutional provision because the State has the supreme
Power to command and enforce obedience to its will from the people within its
Jurisdiction.
Itis legislative in character.
ively
The power to tax (levying or imposition) is peculiarly and exclusi ey
legislative in nature. It cannot be exercise by the executive or judi
branches of the government.
12Chapler 7 Findam ental Princip i
EXCEPTIONS to non-delegation rule:
provided for in the 1987 Constitution such as “Delegation to
the President” under Section 28 Article VI stating that the Congress may
authorize by law, the President to fix, within specified limits and subject to
such limitations and restrictions as it may impose:
«= Tariff rates
import and export quotas
Tonnage and wharfage dues; and
Other duties or imposts within the framework of the national
development program of the government.
a. Delegation as
b. Delegation to local government units as provided under Section 5, Art. X
f of the Constitution. The power of local government units to impose taxes
- and fees is always subject to the limitations which Congress may provide,
the former having no inherent power to tax.
UNSER a CaM en Cie mceem eel
NATIONAL LOCAL
Authority Inherent Delegated (through
constitutional grant)
Nature Legislative in nature through —_ Legislative in nature through
enactment of tax laws by the enactment of focal ordinances
Congress and the Senate by the local legislative branch
CASE to Ponder:
= Since the authority of the LGUs to tax is merely a delegated
power, may the Congress, under the 1987 Constitution,
abolish the power of the former to tax?
ANSWER:
«NO. Congress cannot abolish what is expressly granted by
the fundamental law. The only authority conferred to
Congress is to provide the guidelines and limitations on the
local government's exercise of the power to tax (Sec. 5, Art.
X, 1987 Constitution).
c. peceation to Administrative Agencies
eran aspects of the taxing process that are not really legislative in
Re are vested in administrative agencies such as:
Power to value property
nat
13Te Furdanental Crin
Power to assess and collect taxes
= Power to perform details of computation, appraisement or
adjustment; among others.
ov
ILLUSTRATIVE The Secretary of Finance, upon recommendation of
CASE Commissioner of Internal Revenue, issued a Revenue. Regu :
using gross income as the tax base for Corporation on
| 6
business in the Philippines. Is the Revenue Regulation yen 2
ANSWER: NO
The regulation establishing gross income as the tax base for
Corporations doing business in the Philippines (domestic ag well s
resident foreign) is not valid. This is no longer implementation of
the law (administrative function) but actually it constitutes
legislation because among the powers that are exclusively within
the legislative authority to tax is the power to determine the amount
of the tax.
d. It is subject to Constitutional and inherent limitations
ILLUSTRATIVE The Congress, after much public hearing and consultations with varous
CASE sectors of society, came to the conclusion that it will be good for the
country to have only one system of taxation by centralizing the imposition
and collection of all taxes in the national government. Accordingly, itis
thinking of passing a law that would abolish the taxing power of all loca
government units. Would such a law be valid under the presert
Constitution?
ANSWER: NO
The law centralizing the imposition and collection of all taxes in ne
national government would contravene the Constitution which mandates
that:
ir owt
"Each local government unit shall have the power fo create thee ° 4
sources of revenue and fo levy taxes, fees, and charges eel
such guidelines and limitations as Congress may provide ¢
with the basic policy of local autonomy.” |
|
ittions on |
Itis clear that Congress can only give the guidelines and init a
exercise by the local governments of the power to tax
ranted by the fundamental law cannot be withdrawn by Congress
14es
Chaster € Vandanental Urinegal,
yj (
/
overnment entities, agencies and instrumentalities. Immunity
f
3, Exemption O} . order that governmental functions will not be impeded
4.
5.
6.
; i
is ne ne government will be taxing itself to raise money for itself. The
fone ules shall apply in determining whether government entities and
encies are subject to tax’
Agencies performing governmental functions are tax exempt unless
a.
expressly taxed.
b. Agencies performing proprietary functions are subject to tax unless
expressly exempted.
Government owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs) performing
proprietary functions are subject to tax, however, the following were
granted tax exemptions:
Government Service Insurance System (GSIS)
» Social Security System (SSS)
= Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC)
= Local Water Districts (RA 10026)
= Home Development Mutual Fund (HDMF or Pag-ibig)
NOTE:
= HDMF or Pag-ibig is exempt upon the effectivity of CREATE Law on April 11, 2021
= PCSO became taxable beginning Jan. 1, 2018 or upon effectivity of the TRAIN Law.
INTERNATIONAL COMITY (Polite and friendly agreement[s] among nations)
Under international law, property of a foreign State may not be taxed by
another State due to:
* Sovereign equality of States.
o When one State enters the territory of another State, there is an
implied understanding that the former does not intend to denigrate its
dignity by placing itself under the jurisdiction of the other State.
* Immunity from suit of a State.
Limitation on territorial jurisdiction
Clkatie sla laws Cannot operate beyond a State's territorial limits. Property
ne's jurisdiction does not receive any protection from the State.
Strongest Fl
SCRA 854) 7" the inherent powers of the State (Sison v. Ancheta, 130
15oa as Jay. ,
Chitter 1 Fandanental Priness
CLASSIFICATION OF TAXES
AS TO SCOPE
a. National ~
tax, donor's
e National Government (e.g. income tax, estate
it th
imposed by je taxes, documentary stamp tax)
tax, VAT other percentag
it units such as muni
i ed by local government cipal
b. Local tions (e.9 real estate tax and professional tax receipts). The local
Ee ent unit's power to tax is based on a constitutional grant that
govern for the enactment of the Local Government Code of the
wa i " °
Eee ence, the local government's power to tax is not inherent
TO SUBJECT MATTER OR OBJECT
° oe Personal, poll or capitation — tax of a fixed amount imposed upon
individual, whether citizens or not, residing within a specified territory
without regard to their property or the occupation in which he may be
engaged (e.g. community tax)
b. Property — tax imposed on property, whether real or personal, in
proportion either to its value, or in accordance with some other
reasonable method of apportionment (e.g. real estate tax)
c. Excise — any tax which does not fall within the classification of a poll tax
or a property tax. This is a tax on the exercise of certain rights and
privileges (e.g. income tax, estate tax, donor's tax). Excise tax may also
refer to the tax levied or imposed on sin products and non-essential
goods such as cigars and liquors (Discussed in volume 2 — Transfer and
Business Taxes). Excise taxes of this nature are taxes applicable to
certain specified articles or products manufactured in the Philippines for
domestic sale or consumption or any other disposition and to specified
things or goods imported into the Philippines. It may be specific or ad
valorem
3. AS TO WHO BEARS THE BURDEN
a. Direct — tax which is demanded from the person who also shoulders the
burden of tax or tax which the taxpayer cannot shift to another. Both the
incidence (liability for the payment of the tax) as well as the impact oF
burden of the tax falls on the same person (e.g. income tax, estate tax.
donor's tax).
b. Indirect — tax which is demanded from one person in the expectation and
intention that he shall indemnify himself at the expense of another. ee
are taxes wherein the incidence of or the liability for the payment of l
16Chapter 7 ~ Candanental Prin
/
rson but the burden thereof can be shifted or passed
en eter oe (e.g. VAT, percehtage tax, excise tax on exciseable
a icles) In the case of Maceda v. Macaraig (197 SCRA 771), an indirect
ans defined ‘as one paid by a person who is not directly liable therefor,
and who may therefore shift or pass on the tax to another person or
entity, which ultimately assumes the tax burden
ETERMINATION OF AMOUNT:
: a aie — tax of fixed amount imposed by the head or number, or by
some standard of weight or measurement (e.g. excise tax on cigars and
liquors)
b. Ad valorem — tax of fixed proportion of the value of the property with
; respect to which the tax is assessed (e.g. vat, income tax, donor's tax and
estate tax)
TABLE 1-5: SAMPLE AD-VALOREM and SPECIFIC TAX
EXCISE TAXES ON ALCOHOL PRODUCTS
1. DISTILLED SPIRITS
Excise Tax Due = Ad valorem tax + Specific Tax
Date of AD VALOREM TAX [Based SPECIFIC TAX
Effectivity ‘on net retail price per proof (per proof liter)
(excluding excise tax and vat)]
Jan. 1, 2022 22% P52.00
Jan. 1, 2023 22% 59,00
Jan. 1, 2024 22% 66.00
2025 onwards 22% Specific tax rate shall
be increased by 6%
and every year
thereafter
2. FERMENTED LIQUORS
Date of Effectivity Specific Tax (per liter)
Jan. 1, 2022 P30.00
Jan. 1, 2023 Pai.00
Jan. 1, 2024 43,00
2025 onwards Specific tax rate shall be
increased by 6% and
every year thereafter
17Chapter T - Fundamental Princisl,
4 ent
Ag TO PURPOSE
. i Purpose- tax imposed solely ft
ary, Fiscal, or Revenue Purt 'y for the gene;
a. Primary, of the goverment, i.e., to raise revenue for government
OSE ?
purposes (e.g. income tax, donor's tax and estate tax).
5,
b. Secondary, Regulatory, Special or Sumptuary Purpose — tax imposed for
a specific purpose, ie., to achieve some social or economic ends
irrespective of whether revenue is actually raised or not (e.g. tariff and
certain duties on imports)
6. AS TO GRADUATION OR RATE
Proportional — tax based on a fixed percentages of amount of the
property, receipts, or other basis to be taxed [e.g. VAT, Table 1-5 above
(Ad-valorem tax on distilled spirits)]
a.
b. Progressive or graduated — tax the rate of which increases as the tax
base or bracket increases (e.g. income tax on individual taxpayers)
c. Regressive — tax the rate of which decreases as the tax base or bracket
increases
7. AS TO TAXING AUTHORITY
a. National — taxes imposed under the National Internal Revenue Code
(commonly known as the Tax Code) collected by the national
government through the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and other
national government agencies. Other national taxes other than those
collected by the BIR as provided for under special laws include but
not limited to:
= Customs duties
«Taxes on narcotic drugs
= Special education fund taxes
= Energy taxes on aircraft, motorized wal
power consumption
= Sugar adjustment taxes
* Travel tax
* Private motor vehicle tax
tercraft, and electric
b. Local - taxes imposed by local government units
18Chapter / Findimental Pre)
/
ELEMENTS OF SOUND TAX SYSTEM
jscal Adequacy a.
a. Fiscal et undamental purpose of taxation is to raise the revenue
necessary 10 fund public services. Consequently, it is necessary that the
sources of revenues must be adequate to meet government expenditures
and sustain the level of public services demanded by citizens and
policymakers.
Theoretical Justice or Equity (‘ability to pay principle”)
Taxpayer's ability to pay must be taken into consideration. The tax
burden should be proportionate to the taxpayer's ability to pay
c. Administrative Feasibility
Tax laws must be capable of effective and efficient enforcement. A
good tax system requires informed stakeholders who understand how
taxes are assessed, collected and complied with: It should be clear who
and what is being taxed, and how tax burdens affect them. Therefore, the
tax system should be as simple as possible, and should minimize
gratuitous complexity. Complicated tax rules make the tax system difficult
for citizens to understand. Complexity also makes it harder for
governments to monitor and enforce tax collections, and makes it easier
for lawmakers to enact (and conceal) targeted tax breaks benefitting
particular groups.
LIMITATIONS ON THE STATE’S POWER TO TAX
4. Inherent Limitations
These are restrictions arising from the very nature of the power to
tax itself, Inherent limitations are those limitations which exist despite the
absence of an express constitutional provision.
a) Purpose must be public in nature
This one is synonymous to “governmental purpose. "A tax
must always be imposed for a public purpose, otherwise, it will be
declared as invalid. No tax law may be enacted for the purpose
of raising revenue for private purposes. The purpose should
affect the inhabitants of the State or taxing district as a
community and not merely as individuals.
19OS 6 EEE EAALS ENG CUBE,
S ples
It has been said that the best test of rightful taxatio,
the proceeds of the tax must be used:
a. For the support of the government; or
b. For some of the recognized objects of government; or
c. To promote the welfare of the community, ,
Nis thay
In the case of Gomez vs. Palomar (25 SCRA 827)
Philippine Guarantee Company vs. CIR (13 SCRA 775), it fe
been held that tax has been utilized for public purpose if >
welfare of the nation or the greater portion of its Population hae
benefited for use. s
EFFECT OF INCIDENTAL BENEFIT TO PRIVATE INTEREST
The purposes to be accomplished by taxation need not be
exclusively public. Although private individuals are directly benefited
the tax would still be valid provided such benefit is only incidental. |
LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVE
It is the Congress which has the power to determine whether the
purpose is public or private. A question on the validity of such tax
measure may be raised before the courts on the ground that it is not
for public purpose. However, once it is settled that it is for @ public
purpose, it can’ no longer be a subject of inquiry.
CASE “It is not the immediate result but the ultimate result thet
determines, whether the purpose is public or not. It is not the number of
| persons benefited but it is the character of the purpose that determines
the public character of such law. What is not allowed is that if it has no
link to public welfare. Public purpose is determined by the use to which
the tax money is devoted. If it benefits the community in general, then it
is for public purpose no matter who collects it’. -
| RELATED TiO vs. VIDEOGRAM
b) Prohibition against delegation of the taxing power
What cannot be delegated is the
“enactment/imposition/levying” of tax measure.
regards to administrative implementation of a tax law
assessment, collection, valuation of property for tax purpo
that can be delegated.
legislative
However, a8
(i.e.
se),
c) Territorial limitation (Refer to page 15)
20Chapter 1 ~ Saudanental Prin
2. Constitutional Limitations
a) Due process of law
There must be a valid law and the measure should not be
unconscionable and unjust as to amount to confiscation of
property. Tax statute must not be arbitrary as to find no support
in the Constitution. The power to tax should not be harsh,
oppressive or confiscatory. This limitation is also known as the
right to notice and hearing.
b) Equal protection of laws
All persons subject to legislation shall be treated alike under
% similar circumstances and conditions both in the privileges
conferred and liabilities imposed. The doctrine does not require
that persons or properties different in fact be treated in law as
though they were the same. What it prohibits is class legislation
which discriminates against some and favors others. As long as
there are rational or reasonable grounds for so doing, Congress
may group persons or properties to be taxed and it is sufficient if
all members of the same class are subject to the same rate and
the tax is administered impartially upon them.
CASE/
| ILLUSTRATION ‘An Executive Order was issued pursuant to law, granting tax
and duty incentives only to businesses and residents within the
"secured area" of the Subic Economic Special Zone, and denying
said incentives to those who live within the Zone but outside such
“secured area". Is the constitutional right to equal protection of the
law violated by the Executive Order?
[ca ~TiU-etal vs.CA (GR. No. 127410, January 20, 1999)
ANSWER:
No. Equal protection of the law clause is subject to reasonable
classification. Classification, to be valid, must
= Rest on substantial distinctions,
= Be germane to the purpose of the law,
* Not be limited to existing conditions only,
= Apply equally to all members of the same class.
There are substantial differences between big investors being
enticed to the "secured area" and the business operators outside
iat Oi. that are in accord with the equal protection clause that does not
21i - EL as
require territorial uniformity of laws. The classification ji
equally fo al the resident indvidvals and businesses me
“secured area’. The residents, being in ike cirounertt Me
contributing directly to the achievement of the end purpose on
law, are not categorized further. Instead, they are simiay,, 0
ty treated.
both in privileges granted and obligations required IY treated
c) Rule of uniformity and equity in taxation
“The rule of taxation shall be uniform and equitable.” |p Tequires
the uniform application and operation, without discrimination Of the
tax in every place where the subject of the tax is found. It does ne
however, require absolute identity or equality under 3)
circumstances, but subject to reasonable classification, .
For classification to be valid, the following must concur:
«It must be based on substantial distinction
« — It must apply both to present and future conditions
= It must be germane to the purposes of the law
= It must apply equally to all members of the same class
RELATED PLDT vs. GLOBE and SMART
CASE RA 7926 provides for equality of treatment of the telecommunications
industry cannot be a valid basis for PLDT to claim the same exemption ang
privilege granted to GLOBE and SMART. PLDT is not similarly situated nor
is the same as GLOBE and SMART who provide for handheld phone
communication. Being not similarly situated, the same is not of simiz
class. Hence, no room for the application of uniformity and equality
A progressive system of taxation means that tax laws shall
place emphasis on direct taxes rather than on indirect taxes, with
ability to pay as the principal criterion. (Article VI, Section 28 of the
Constitution). Regressive tax rates refer to tax rates which decreases
as the tax base or bracket increases. Regressive tax rates should be
differentiated from a regressive system of taxation which exists whe
there are more indirect taxes imposed than direct taxes.
d) Prohibition against imprisonment for non-payment of “poll tax”
No person shall be imprisoned for debt or non-payment :
poll tax. The non-imprisonment rule applies to non-paynen
Poll tax which is punishable only by a surcharge, but not to we
violations like falsification of community tax certificate and sed
Payment of other taxes. Poll tax is a tax of fixed amount imp’
090e)
g
Chaplet l— Landamental [rincisles
ciples
on residents within a specific territory regardless of citizenship
business OF profession. :
Prohibition against impairment of obligation of contracts
No law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed.
The obligation of a contract is impaired when its terms or
conditions are changed by law or by a party without the consent
of the other, thereby weakening the position or rights of the latter.
An example of impairment by law is when a later taxing statute
revokes a tax exemption based on a contract. But this only
applies when the tax exemption has been granted for a valid
If the tax exemption pertains, for instance, toa
later statute may revoke such exemption because
franchise tax is subject to
consideration.
franchise tax, a
the constitution provides that a
amendment, alteration or repeal.
Prohibition against infringement of religious freedom
No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and
enjoyment «of religious profession and worship, without
discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No
religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political
rights. The payment of license fees for the distribution and sale of
bibles suppresses the constitutional right of free exercise of
religion.
Prohibition against appropriation of proceeds of taxation for the
use, benefit, or support of any church
No public money or property shall be appropriated, applied,
paid, or employed directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or
support of any church, denomination, sectarian institution or
system of religion, or of any priest, preacher, minister or other
religious teacher, or dignitary as such except when such priest,
preacher, minister or dignitary is assigned to the armed forces, or
to any penal institution, or government orphanage or leprosarium
Prohibition against taxation of religious, charitable and
educational entities
Charitable institutions, churches and parsonages or convents
appurtenant thereto, mosques, non-profit cemeteries, and all
lands, | buildings and improvements, actually, directly, and
exclusively used for religious, charitable, or educational purposes
shall be exempt from taxation, This is an exemption from real
230 OPE © EMMANUEL €- Vinee L.
S es
property tax only. The exemption in favor of Property
exclusively for charitable or educational Purposes is not limited «2
property actually indispensable therefore, but extends to faciitie®
which are incidental to and reasonably Necessary for ie
accomplishment of said purposes. The test of exemption refers °
actual use, not ownership. The term “exclusively” should i.
interpreted as “primarily” rather than “solely”. e
| ILLUSTRATIVE Mr. Ramos is the owner of a 5,000 Sq. m. parcel of land located int
| CASE city limits of Naga City. He leased the Property for P50,000 a a
! religious congregation for a period of fifteen (15) years (2040-2095"
‘The religious congregation built on a 1,000 sq. m. portion a seminan
and a chapel that it used in connection with its religious Activities. |g
Constructed a ten (10) storey building on the remaining 4,009 4. m.
which it rented out to various commercial establishments, the Proceeds
of which go to the support of its various Seminaries located throughout
the Philippines. These seminaries are organized as non-profit and Ton-
stock educational institutions. _
Questions:
1. Is Mr. Ramos exempt from the payment of real property taxes?
= Yes, Mr. Ramos is exempt from the payment of real Property taxes on the
1,000 sq. m. portion of his 5,000 Sq. M. lot, as well as on the Temaining
4,000 sq.m.
2. Is the religious congregation exempt from the Payment of real Property taxes?
* The religious congregation should pay real property taxes on the 4,000 Sq.
m. parcel of land and the 10-storey building because the basis for taxation
of real property is use and not Ownership. However, it is exempt from real
property taxes on the 1,000 Sq. M. parcel of land as well as on the
improvements the chapel and the Seminary. This is so because they are
actually, directly and exclusively used for religious purposes. The treatment
is different with regard to the 4,000 Sq. m. lot and the 10 storey building
which it rented out to commercial establishments.
3. Is the religious Congregation exempt from the payment of income taxes on the
rental receipts?
= The religious Congregation is subject to income taxation. The constttions
tax exemptions refer only to real property that are actually, directly a
exclusively used for religious, charitable or educational purposes, and ms
the only Constitutionally recognized exemption from taxation of men we
those earned by non-profit, non-stock educational institutions whic
actually, directly and exclusively used for educational purposes.
OAi), Prohibition against taxation of non-stock, non-profit educational
institutions.
All. revenues and assets of non-
stock, non-profit ‘educational institutions Nonprofit non-stock
used actually, directly, and exclusively | Educational Institution
for educational purposes shall be This exemption covers
d duties. However, income, property, donor's tax,
exempt from taxes an |
they shall be subject to internal revenue | and customs duties
tax on income from trade, business or | {astra from Selo in
ivit is not e preceding page whic!
other activity, the conduct of which is no! | ertains only 10 oy eX)
related to the exercise or performance
by such educational institution of its KO i
educational purposes or functions.
Taxation of “proprietary” educational institutions
Proprietary educational institutions, including those cooperatively
owned, may likewise be entitled to such exemptions subject to the
limitations provided by law including restrictions on dividends and
provisions for investment. Proprietary educational institutions and
hospitals which are non-profit shall pay a tax of ten percent (10%) on
their taxable income, except for passive incomes which are subject to
different tax rates as discussed in Chapter 4.
j) OTHERS
4. Grant of tax exemption
No law granting any tax exemption (i.e., -amnesties,
condonations and refunds) shall be passed without the
concurrence of a majority of all Members of Congress (voting
separately).
2. Veto of appropriation, revenue, tariff bills by the President
j The President shall have the power to veto any
particular item or items in an appropriation, revenue, or tariff
bill, but the veto shall not affect the item or items to Which he
does not object. An item in a bill refers to particulars, details,
the distinct and severable parts of a bill. In budgetary
legislation, an item is an individual sum of money dedicated
1,
ul y
253
Craster C Landamental lrincisl
A /
Delegated authority of President to impose tariff rates, impo
and export quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues as delegates
by Congress through a law (subject to Congressional ‘iri
and restrictions) within the framework — of nations,
development program. ‘al
Non-impairment of the Supreme Court (SC) jurisdiction
Congress cannot take away from the Supreme Cour
the power given to it by the Constitution as the final arbiter of
tax cases. The Supreme Court shall have the followin,
powers: Review, revise, reverse, modify, or affirm on apiied
or certiorari, as the law or the Rules of Court may Provide.
final judgments and orders of lower courts in all cases
involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or tol)
or any penalty imposed in relation thereto. ‘
REVENUE BILLS shall originate exclusively from the House
of Representatives
All appropriation, revenue or tariff bills, _ bills
authorizing an increase of the public debt, bills of Socal
application, and private bills shall originate exclusively in the
House of Representatives, but the Senate may propose or
concur with amendments. The Constitution simply means
that the initiative for the filing of bills must come from the
House of Representatives, on the theory that, elected as they
are from the districts, the members of the House can be
expected to be more sensitive to the local needs and
problems. Given the power of the Senate to propose
amendments, it can propose its own version even wilt
respect to bills which are required by the Constitution to
originate in the House nor does the Constitution prohibit the
filing in the Senate of a substitute bill in anticipation of its
receipt of the bill from the House, so long as action by the
Senate as a body is withheld pending receipt of the House
bill. (Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 235 SCRA 630)CMMEEEEL © a
RELATED (TOLENTINO V SECRETARY OF FINANCE, GR No, 115455, Oct 30,
CASE 1995).
ISSUE:
The House of Representatives introduced HB 7000 which envisioned to
levy @ tax on various transactions Alter the bill was approved by the
House, the bill was sent to the Senate as so required by the Constitution.
in the upper house, instead of a deliberation on the House Bill, the
Senate introduced SB 6000 which was its own VTE of the same tax
The Senate deliberated on this Senate Bill and approved the same. The
House Bill and the Senate Bill were then consolidated in the Bicameral
Committee. Eventually, the consolidated bill was approved and sent to
the President who signed the same. The private sectors affected by the
new law questioned the validity of the enactment on the ground that the
constitutional provision requiring that all revenue bills should originate
from the House of Representatives had been violated Resolve the issue.
ANSWER: There is nO violation of the constitutional requirement that all
revenue bills should originate from the House of Representatives. Whatis
prohibited is for the Senate to enact revenue measures on its own without
a bill originating from the House. But once the revenue bill was passed by
the House and sent to the Senate, the latter can pass its own version on
the same subject matter consonant with the latter's power to propose oF
concur with amendments. This follows from the co-equality of the two
_ chambers of Congress. _
6. _ Infringement of press freedom
This limitation does not mean that the press is
exempt from taxation. Taxation constitutes an infringement of
press freedom when it operates as a prior restraint to the
exercise of this constitutional right. When the tax is imposed
‘on the receipts or the income of the press it is a valid exercise
of the sovereign prerogative.
“7. Revocation of Tax Exemptions
Tax exemptions, such as “grant of franchise” may be
revoked by another law as it is specifically provided in the
Constitution that the grant of any franchise is always subject
to amendment, alteration, or repeal by the Congress when
the common good so requires.
O7"yx" Corporation was the recipient of two tax exemptions bot!
ILLUSTRATIVE oats one law exempting the company's bond issues from tae |
CAS! the other exempting the company from taxes in the operation of its pubjg
utilities. The two laws extending the tax exemptions were revoked 4,
Congress before their expiry dates. Were the revocations
constitutional?
ANSWER: YES
The exempting statutes are both granted unilaterally by Congress in the
exercise of taxing powers. Since taxation is the rule and tax exemption
the exception, any tax exemption unilaterally granted can be withdrawn at
the pleasure of the taxing authority without violating the Constitution
Neither of these were issued by the taxing authority in a contract lawfully
entered by it so that their revocation would not constitute an impairment of
the obligations of contracts. (Mactan Cebu International Airport
___ Authority v, Marcos, G.R No. 120082, September 11,1996).
SITUS OF TAXATION
Literally, situs of taxation means “place” of taxation. It is the State or
political unit which has jurisdiction to impose a particular tax. The State
where the subject to be taxed has a situs may rightfully levy and collect the
tax. The situs is necessarily in the State which has jurisdiction or which
exercises dominion over the subject in question.
FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE SITUS OF TAXATION
Subject matter (person, property, or activity)
Nature of the tax
Citizenship
Residence of the taxpayer
Source of income
Place of excise, business or occupation being taxed
o\-/03 EXAMPLES OF SITUS OF TAXATION
|
| Persons Residence of the taxpayer
| Real Property Location
-eaogD
| ;
| Personal Property Location; Place of sale or transaction
-_sChapter 7 - Fandamental Vrinciples
intangible — Domicile of the owner except when the intangible has a situs elsewhere
personal Property suchas: ;
‘= Franchise, patents, copyrights, trademarks: Situs is the place or
country where such intangibles are exercised
= Receivables: Domicile or residence of the debtor
= Bank deposits: Location of the depository bank.
s+ shares of stock in a domestic corporation of a nonresident alien are
taxable in the Philippines because the said shares receive the protection
and benefit of the Philippine laws.
*** Source of income
Income |
* — Occupation - where the occupation is engaged in
= Transaction - where the transaction took place
| Business Place of the business
| Gratuitous Residence or citizenship of the taxpayer, or location of the property
| Transfer __ ys sat 2 _ _
TAX DISTINGUISHED FROM OTHER TERMS OR IMPOSTS
4. TAX versus TOLL
A Toll is a sum of money for the use of something, generally applied
to the consideration, which is paid of the use of a road, bridge or the like
of a public nature.
Demand of proprietorship Demand of sovereignty
Paid for the use of another's property Paid for the support of government
Amount is based on cost of construction or Amount is based on the necessities of the
maintenance of the public improvement State
used
Maybe imposed by the government or May be imposed only by the State
rivate individuals or entities
2. TAX versus PENALTY
Penalty is a sanction imposed as a punishment for violation of law or
acts deem injuri edi Shite t
penalty jurious. The violation of tax may give right to imposition ofChifley € — Landdmental Dring
/
Primarily aimed at Hsing revenue
Designed to regulate conduct
May be imposed by the government or May be imposed only by the govemment
private individuals or entities
3. TAX versus SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Special assessment is an enforced proportional Contribution from
owners of lands for special benefits resulting from public improvements,
In Republic v. Bacolod, 17SCRA632, a special assessment is a levy on
property which derives some special benefit from the improvement. jts
purpose is to finance such improvement, thus accruing only to the owners
thereof who, after all, pay the assessment.
It is not a tax measure intended to raise revenues for the
government because the Proceeds thereof may be devoted to the
specific purpose for which the assessment was authorized
CHARACTERISTICS OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
a. Levied only on land
b. Nota personal liability of the person assessed
c. Based wholly on benefits (not necessary)
d. Exceptional both as to time and place
4. TAX versus REVENUE
Revenue refers to all the funds or income derived by the government,
whether from tax or any other source.
| Amour collected —.._____ Amount imposed -
5. TAX versus SUBSIDY
___ Subsidy is a pecuniary aid directly granted the government to an
individual or private commercial enterprise deemed beneficial to the
pute Subsidy is not a tax although tax may have to be imposed to pay
it.
6. TAX versus PERMIT or LICENSE FEE
Permit or License is a charge imposed under the police power for
Purposes of regulation, .Pe menweeen saa
For regulation
f police power
a = mies to the necessary Generally no limit
expenses of regulation
Imposed on the right of reward of an Imposed also on persons or property
officer for specific services
i reward of an officer An enforced contribution assesses by
Lena eons “ sovereign authority to defray public
fresno expenses
For revenue
Exercise of taxing power
d contribution assesses by
‘lure to pay license fee makes the act or An enforce !
banees lege sovereign authority to defray public
expenses
TEST IN DETERMINING IF THE IMPOSITION IS A TAX OR
LICENSE FEE:
«= If the purpose is primarily or if revenue is, at least, one of the
real and substantial purposes, then the exaction is a tax. If
the purpose is regulatory in nature, it is a license (PAL v.
Edu)
PAL vs. EDU, 164 SCRA 320 (1988)
The Supreme Court ruled that “Fees” may be regarded as
taxes even though they also serve as instruments of regulation
because taxation may be made as an implementation of the State’s
police power. |f the purpose of the “fee” is primarily to raise revenue
or if “revenue” is at least one of the real and substantial purposes,
then the exaction is properly called tax. In the case provided, the
Purpose behind the law requiring owners of vehicles to pay for their
registration is mainly to raise revenue or funds for the construction
and maintenance of highways and, to a much lesser degree, pay the
Operating expenses of the administering agency. Hence, such
exaction or fee is classified as tax.
7. ae versus CUSTOMS DUTIES .
‘usto} i i i
oa cuny are taxes imposed on goods exported from or imported
31. TAX versus DEBT
2 DEE
Based on contract
May be paid in kind
Assignable/May be the subject of set-off or
compensation
A person cannot be imprisoned for non-
payment of debt (except when it arises
from a crime)
Draw interest when stipulated or when of
prescription default
9. TAX versus TARIFF
. 8 DEEN: LT ihe
NG
Based on law
Generally payable in money
Cannot generally be assignable/subj
set-off or compensation stay
Imprisonment is a Sanction for Non.
Payment of tax (except poll tax) .
Does NOT draw interest ex
Cept only wh
delinquent Yeon
‘Tariff may be used in one of three (3) senses:
a. A book of rates drawn usually in alphabetical order cont
names of several kinds of merchandise with the Corresponding
duties to be paid for the same; or
b. The duties payable on goods imported or exported; or
c. The system or principle of imposing duties on the importation (or
exportation) of goods.
*The term tariff and customs duties are used interchangeably in the Tarif and
Customs Code
DOUBLE TAXATION
In its strict sense, double
taxation referred to is direct duplicate
taxation. In its broad sense, double
taxation is referred to as indirect double
taxation. It extends to all cases in which
Direct double
taxation becomes legally
objectionable for being
there is a burden of two or more oppressive and
'mpositions. inequitable. It violates the
Direct double taxation means concept of ~— equal
taxing twice
1. By the same taxing authority,
jurisdiction or taxing district
For the same purpose
Same subject or object
Same kind/character of the tax
Vikon
In the same year or taxing period
protection, uniformity and
equitableness of taxation
in the Constitution.not prohibite'
not present.
expressly Pro!
favored.
Se ECE ee
/
There is indirect double/duplicate taxation (Broad Sense ~ which is
d by the constitution) if any of the elements described above is
Unlike the United States Constitution, our Constitution does not
hibit direct double taxation. However, it is something not
Such taxation should, whenever possible, be avoided ang
prevented
ILLUSTRATIVE CASES:
Determine if there is double taxation in the following independent cases:
RELATED _VILLANUEVAvs. CITY OF ILOILO (26 SCRA 578
CASE The Supreme Court held that there is no constitutional prohibition
against “double taxation” in the Philippines. However, in its strict sense, there
is ‘direct’ double taxation (strict sense) when the same property is taxed
twice when it should be taxed only once, provided both taxes must be
imposed
= Onthe same property or subject matter
For the same purpose
By the same State/ Government or taxing authority
Within the same jurisdiction or taxing district
During the same period; and .
They must be the same kind or character of tax
Jimsom, a lessor of a property, pays the following; real estate tax on the
premises, a real estate dealer's tax based on rental receipts and income tax on
the rentals. Jimson claims that this is double taxation.Decide.
Answer:
There is no double taxation. DOUBLE TAXATION means taxing for the same
tax period the same thing or activity twice, when it should be taxed but once, by
the same taxing authority for the same purpose and with the same kind or
character of tax. The REAL ESTATE TAX isa tax on property; the REAL
ESTATE DEALER'S TAX is a tax on the privilege to engage in business; while
the INCOME TAX is a tax on the privilege to earn an income. These taxes are
imposed by different taxing authorities and are essentially of different kind and
character (Villanueva vs. City of lloilo, 26 SCRA 578)
Municipality of Cordon has an ordinance which requires that all stores, restaurants,
and other establishments selling liquor should pay a fixed annual fee of P500.
Subsequently, the Municipal board proposed an ordinance imposing a sales tax
equivalent to 5% of the amount paid for the purchase or consumption of liquor in
Stores, restaurants and other. establishments. The Municipal mayor, refused to
Sign the ordinance on the ground that it would constitute double taxation. Is the
Tefusal of the mayor justified?7
Answer: is not justified. The impositions are of different nature
No. The refusal of the Maye : s in the nature of a license fee impose
fixed annual fee i
and character of police power while the 5% tax on purchase oF Consumption
tow i tax imposed through the exercise of taxing powers. Both a license fee
si . ax fay be imposed on the same business or occupation, or for selling the
ant
ie i in violati he rule against double t
‘and this is not in violation of tl t axation
sar gna ener de Tabacos de Filipinos v. City of Manila, 8 SCRA 3¢7
[1963)).
MEANS OF AVOIDING OR MINIMIZING THE BURDEN OF TAXATION
4. Shiftin: -
Siting is the transfer of the burden of a tax by the original payer or
the one on whom the tax was assessed or imposed to someone else.
Transferred is not the payment of the tax but the burden of the tax. Only
indirect taxes may be shifted; direct taxes cannot be shifted.
Example:
= Manufacturer or producer may shift tax assessed to wholesaler,
who in turn shifts it to the retailer, who also shifts it to the final
purchaser or consumer.
Taxes that may be shifted:
« VAT; Percentage taxes; Excise taxes on excisable articles
= Ad-valorem taxes that oil companies pay to BIR upon removal of
petroleum products from its refinery
2. Transformation
An escape from taxation where the producer or manufacturer pays
the tax and endeavor to recoup himself by improving his process of
production thereby turning out his units of products at a lower cost
3. Tax Evasion
Tax evasion is the use by the taxpayer of illegal or fraudulent means,
to defeat or lessen the payment of a’tax. It is also known as ‘tax dodging.
It is connotes fraud through the use of pretenses or forbidden devices to
lessen or defeat taxes.
Example:
* Deliberate failure to report a taxable income or prop
deliberate reduction
erly;
34ELEMEN
(Based on Commissi
Benigno
Tax evasion Ct
The en
a)
°)
P.
TS OF TAX EVASION
oner of Internal Revenue, petitioner, vs. The Estate of
Toda, Jr, G.R. No. 147188, September 14, 2004)
‘connotes the integration of three factors:
d to be achieved, i.e., the payment of less than that known
by the taxpayer to be legally due, or the non-payment of tax when
it is shown that a tax is due;
An accompanying state of mind which is described as being
"evil," in "bad faith," "willful," or "deliberate and not accidental";
and
A course of action or failure of action which is unlawful.
Tax Avoidance
Tax avoidance is the exploitation by the taxpayer of legally
permissible alternative tax rates or methods of assessing taxable property
or income in order to avoid or reduce tax liability. It is a tax saving device
within the means sanctioned by law. It is politely called “tax minimization”
and is not punishable by law. This method should be used by the
taxpayer in good faith and at arm’s length.
ILLUSTRATIVE Pedro's income from leasing his property reaches the maximum rate of tax
CASE
under the law. He donated one-half of his said property to a non-stock,
non-profit educational institution whose income and assets are actually,
directly and exclusively used for educational purposes, and therefore
qualified for tax exemption under Article XIV, Section 4 (3) of the
Constitution and Section 30 (h) of the Tax Code. Having thus transferred a
portion of his said asset, Pedro succeeded in paying a lesser tax on the
rental income derived from his property under the lower tax bracket. Is
there tax avoidance or tax evasion? |
ANSWER:
There is tax avoidance. Pedro has exploited a fully permissive alternative
method to reduce his income tax by transferring part of his rental income to
a tax-exempt entity through a donation of one-half of the income producing
Property. The donation is likewise exempt from the donor's tax. The
donation is the legal means employed to transfer the incidence of income
__ {ax on the rental income.
355. Exemption i ns or corporations or
A 0 particular perso. ‘“ lo
Itis the grant ar cular class from a tax net persons and
persons oF COrPOT™” AN in the same State or taxing = re obliged
corporations gon mt or privilege; it is freedom from a financial charge
to pay. Its an inthe a ‘are subjected (Greenfield v. Meer - 77 Phil
which others s a clear provision therefor. Itis
or burden to 5 Sets |
tion is allowed only ! e
an soesatily discriminatory as long as there is a reasonable foundation
rational basis. In the construction of tax statutes, exemptions are not
favored and are construed against the taxpayer.
FOR GRANTING TAX EXEMPTIONS , ;
Saran based on contract. In such a case, the public which is
° represented by the government is supposed to receive a full
equivalent therefore, i.e. charter of a corporation.
b. May be based on some ground of public policy, i.e., to encourage
new industries or to foster charitable institutions. Here, the
government need not receive any consideration in return for the tax
exemption.
c. May be based on grounds of reciprocity or to lessen the rigors of
international double or multiple taxation
NATURE OF POWER TO GRANT TAX EXEMPTION
a. National government. The power to grant tax exemptions is an
attribute of sovereignty for the power to prescribe who or what
Persons or property shall be taxed implies the power to prescribe who
or what persons or property shall not be taxed. It is inherent in the
exercise of the power to tax that the sovereign State be free to select
the subjects of taxation and to grant exemptions therefrom.
b. Local governments. Municipal corporations are clothed with no
inherent Power to tax or to grant tax exemptions. But the moment the
tee ‘o impose a particular tax is granted, they also have the power
eon hen therefrom unless forbidden by some provision of
Pe Institution or the law. The legislature may delegate its power to
grant tax exemptions to the same extent that it may exercise the
Power to exempt.t o
KINDS OF TAX EXEMPTION
sis? i i i
As 10 a stitutional. Immunities from taxation which originate from the
itution. .
con an Immunities from taxation which emanates from legislation.
form:
“a i epress. Exemptions expressly granted by statute.
ie rty, or rights are deemed
Implied. When particular persons, property, orr e dee!
i Benak as they fall outside the scope of the taxing provision itself.
As to extent: ; |
4. Total. Connotes absolute immunity. | ;
2. Partial. One where a collection of a part of the tax is dispensed with.
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING TAX EXEMPTIONS
Exemptions from taxation are highly disfavored. in law. He who claims
an exemption must be able to justify his claim by the clearest grant of
t presumed. If
organic or statute: law because tax exemptions are no’ ;
ambiguous, there is no tax exemption. He who claims exemption should
convincingly prove that he is exempted. Therefore, tax exemption must be
strictly construed. No law granting any tax exemption shall be passed
without the concurrence of majority of all members of Congress.
{ ILLUSTRATIVE As an incentive for investors, a law was passed giving newly established
| CASE companies in certain economic zone exemption from all taxes, duties,
| fees, imposts and other charges for a period of three years. ABC Corp
was organized and was granted such incentive. In the course of business,
ABC Corp. purchased mechanical equipment from XYZ Inc. The latter, in
its ordinary business dealings, is subject to a sales tax. XYZ Inc. claims,
however, that since it sold the equipment to ABC Corp. which is tax
exempt, it should not be liable to pay the sales tax. Is this claim tenable?
ANSWER:
No. Exemption from taxes is personal in nature and covers only taxes for
which the taxpayer-grantee is directly liable. The sales tax is a tax on the
seller who is not exempt from taxes. Since XYZ Inc. is directly liable for
the sales tax and no tax exemption privilege is ever given to him, its claim
that the sale is tax exempt is not tenable. A tax exemption is construed in
strictissimi juris and it cannot be permitted to exist upon vague
implications.JESTY
a intentional overlooking by the State of its authority
; Lor ilty of evasion or violatio
It is the general ns otherwise guilty > 1 of
to impose penalties on ft partakes of an absolute forgiveness or Waiver
law. is to give tax eva
a revenue or tax ight to collect. It is a way to g ers,
ment of its right . ,
OS tercleht and are willing to reform a chance to do so.
who
Tax amnesty involves immunity from all criminal, civil and
ax
administrative liabilities from non-payment of taxes.
6. Capitalization
aateanana bun 3 : ice of income producin
italization is the reduction in the selling price o' 9
roan by an amount equal to the capitalized value of future taxes that
may be paid by the purchaser.
SOURCES OF TAX LAWS
1. Philippine Constitution
Tax treaties and international agreements
2.
A tax treaty is one of the sources of our law on taxation. The
Philippine Government usually enters into tax treaties in order to
avoid or minimize the effects of double taxation. A treaty has the
force and effect of law.
3. The National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) or the Tax Code
4. Tariff and Customs Code
5. Local Government Code
6. Local tax ordinances (City or Municipal tax codes)
7. Other Special laws
8. Decisions of the Supreme Court and the Court of Tax Appeals
9. Revenue rules and regulations and administrative tulings and opinions
Effectivity of revenue rules and regulations
Except when the law otherwise expressly provides, the aforesaid
revenue tax issuances shall not begin to be Operative until after due
Notice thereof May be fairly assumed.
38purpose of rules and regulations
a. TO properly enforce and execute the laws
larify and explain the law ; 7
7 7 sie effect the law's general provisions by providing details of
administration and procedure
Requisites for validity of rules and regulations
a. They must not be contrary to law and the Constitution.
b. They must be published in the Official Gazette or a newspaper of
general circulation.
ILLUSTRATIVE Saint Paul College of Makati vs. Hon. Kim Jacinto S.
CASE Henares (Civil Case No. 13-1405, 25 July2014)
The Regional Trial Court of Makati City held that under the Constitution,
all revenues and assets of non-stock, non-profit educational institutions
used actually, directly and exclusively for educational purposes shall be
exempt from taxes and duties. Upon the dissolution or cessation of the
corporate existence ‘of such institutions, their assets shall be disposed of
in the manner provided by law. The exemption, which is given by the
Constitution itself, may not be diminished by legislation or by
administrative regulation.
Applying the foregoing rationale of the provision on tax-exemption, the
Court found Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 20-2013
unconstitutional as it imposes as @ prerequisite to the enjoyment by non-
stock, non-profit educational institutions of the privilege of tax exemption
under the Constitution both a registration and approval requirement
particularly, that they submit an application for tax exemption to the BIR
subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the
form of a tax exemption ruling (TER) which is valid for a period of 3
years and subject to renewal. This requirement of filing a TER is in
addition to the filing of an Annual Information Return that they are
currently required to submit to the BIR pursuant to Section 4 of DOF
Order No. 137-87.
The imposition of the aforementioned requisites serves as diminution of
the Constitutional privilege, which even the Congress cannot diminish by
legislation, and thus more so by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue
who merely exercises quasi-legislative function.a _ + Jy
Chapter T - Fiudamental Pring
Nature of Internal Revenue Laws
litical in nature. Tax laws are ¢,
revenue laws are not pol | ong
tnlemnat in nature, although there are penalties provided for thei
and not re purpose of tax laws in imposing penalties for delinquencies
ie spal the timely payment of taxes or to punish evasion or neglect of duty
io
in respect thereof.
Construction and Interpretation of Tax Laws or Tax Legislation
Public purpose is always presumed.
If the law is clear, apply the law in accordance to its plain and simple
tenor.
A statute will not be construed as imposing a tax unless it does go
clearly, expressly and unambiguously.
= In case of doubt, it is construed most strongly against the
Government, and liberally in favor of the taxpayer.
Provisions of a taxing act are not to be extended by implication.
ly unless the purpose of the legislature
"Tax laws operate prospectivel
expressly declared or may be implied
to give retrospective effect is
from the language used.
Tax laws are special laws and Prevail over a general law.
RULE WHEN THERE IS DOUBT IN STATUTE OR LAW
No person or property is subject to taxation unless within the terms 0”
plain import of a taxing statute. In every case of doubt, tax statutes are
fonstrued strictly against the government and liberally in favor of the taxpayer
(Davao Gulf Lumber Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al.
ae 76, 88). Taxes, being burdens, are not to be presumed beyond
i ve enue expressly and clearly declares. (Lincoln Philippine Lie
nsurance Company, Inc., etc., v. Court of Appeals, et al., 293 SCRA 92, 99)Ohupler 7 - Fandamental Prine ple
provisiONS GRANTING TAX EXEMPTIONS
re construed strictly against the taxpayer claiming tax
tax is unquestionably imposed, a claim of exemption
from tax payments must be clearly shown and based on language in the law
too plain to be mistaken. [Davao Gulf Lumber Corporation; Manila Electric
Company v. Vera, (67 SCRA351)]-
Such provisions al
exemption. When a
APPLICATION OF TAX LAWS
General rule:
ration because the nature and
d understood by the taxpayer at
completed.
Tax laws are prospective in opel
of the tax could not be foreseen ant
amount
he transactions which the law seeks to tax was Ci
the time t
Exception:
While it is not favored, a statute may nevertheless operate
retroactively provided it is expressly declared or is clearly the legislative
intent. But a tax law should not be given retroactive application when it would
be harsh and oppressive which violate the taxpayer's constitutional rights
regarding equity and due process (Fernandez vs Fernandez- 99 Phil. 934;
CIR vs Filipinas Cia de Seguros — 107 Phil. 1055).
: 246 of the Tax Code also provides that any revocation,
modification or reversal of any of the rules and regulations promulgated in
accordance with Sections 244 and 255 or any of the rulings or circulars
promulgated by the Commissioner shall not be given retroactive application if
the revocation, modification or reversal will be prejudicial to the taxpayers
Section
Section 24 of Rulings co
Any revocation, modification or reversal of any of the rules and
regulations promulgated in accordance with the preceding Sections or
any of the rulings or circulars promulgated by the Commissioner shall
not be given retroactive application if the revocation, modification or
petereet will be prejudicial to the taxpayers, except in the following
es:eo - ff. Cay,
Chatter 7 - lardanelal Vines
i isstates or omits mater.
‘axpayer deliberately missi er
a) peers ee turn or any document required of him ’Y the
Bureau of Internal Revenue;
thered by the Bur
the facts subsequently gat Pau of
») nee | Revenue are materially different trom the facts,
which the ruling is based; or
c) Where the taxpayer acted in bad faith.
TAXPAYER’S SUIT
It is one brought or filed by a taxpayer arguing the validity of a tax
statute and its enactment or the constitutionality of its alleged public Purpose,
It is a case where the act complained of directly involves the illegal
disbursement of public funds derived from taxation. Taxpayers have locus
standi to question the validity of tax measures or illegal expenditures of Public
money. In such cases, they are parties in interest who will be prejudiced or
benefited by the avails of the suit. The general rule is that not only persons
individually affected but also taxpayers have sufficient interest Of preventing
the illegal expenditures of money raised by taxation. They may, therefore,
question in the proper court the constitutionality of statutes requiring the
expenditure of public funds. But a taxpayer is not relieved from the obligation
of paying a tax because of his belief that it is being misappropriated by certain
officials, for otherwise, collection of taxes would be hampered and this may
result in the paralyzation of important governmental functions. In Lozada vs.
Comelec, “It is only when an act complained of which may include a
legislative enactment of a statute, involves the illegal expenditure of public
Money that the so-called taxpayers’ suit may be allowed.