Hex A56633 5A66CC A599CC 5A9933 A599B4 5A99AA A566AA 5A66AA A566CC 5A6633 A59933 5A99CC A59955 5A9955

A566CC 5A6633 A59933 5A99CC A59955 5A9955 A56655 5A6655

Color Dec ENTP ISFP ESFJ INTJ ENFJ ISTJ ESTP INFP ESFP INTP ENTJ ISFJ ESTJ INFJ ENFP ISTP E A5
10839603 ENTP IDT NVL SPP CST ADV CHR NBR TRB EGM PAL CPL ANI STM PED CMP CTP I 5A
5924556 ISFP NVL IDT CST SPP CHR ADV TRB NBR PAL EGM ANI CPL PED STM CTP CMP
10852812 ESFJ SPP CST IDT NVL NBR TRB ADV CHR CPL ANI EGM PAL CMP CTP STM PED P 66
5937459 INTJ CST SPP NVL IDT TRB NBR CHR ADV ANI CPL PAL EGM CTP CMP PED STM J 99
10852788 ENFJ ADV CHR NBR TRB IDT NVL SPP CST STM PED CMP CTP EGM PAL CPL ANI
5937578 ISTJ CHR ADV TRB NBR NVL IDT CST SPP PED STM CTP CMP PAL EGM ANI CPL NT 33
10839722 ESTP NBR TRB ADV CHR SPP CST IDT NVL CMP CTP STM PED CMP ANI EGM PAL NF/ST 55
5924522 INFP TRB NBR CHR ADV CST SPP NVL IDT CTP CMP PED STM ANI CMP PAL EGM NF/ST AA
10839756 ESFP EGM PAL CPL ANI STM PED CMP CTP IDT NVL SPP CST ADV CHR NBR TRB NF/ST B4 (Unique)
5924403 INTP PAL EGM ANI CPL PED STM CTP CMP NVL IDT CST SPP CHR ADV TRB NBR SF CC
10852659 ENTJ CPL ANI EGM PAL CMP CTP STM PED SPP CST IDT NVL NBR TRB ADV CHR
5937612 ISFJ ANI CPL PAL EGM CTP CMP PED STM CST SPP NVL IDT TRB NBR CHR ADV
10852693 ESTJ STM PED CMP CTP EGM PAL CMP ANI ADV CHR NBR TRB IDT NVL SPP CST
5937493 INFJ PED STM CTP CMP PAL EGM ANI CMP CHR ADV TRB NBR NVL IDT CST SPP
10839637 ENFP CMP CTP STM PED CPL ANI EGM PAL NBR TRB ADV CHR SPP CST IDT NVL
5924437 ISTP CTP CMP PED STM ANI CPL PAL EGM TRB NBR CHR ADV CST SPP NVL IDT

KEY Conversion: RGB (0 vs 1)

IDT Identity Idn Red: I vs E
PAL Pal Mrr Green: P vs J
NBR Neighbor Lkl Cmp Blue: NT vs SF (C vs W)
CMP Companion Cmp Lkl Hero Parent Child Animus Opposing Critical Deceiving Devilish
CPL Complement Qid E 10100101 165 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 EIEIIEIE
CTP Counterpart Sp> Sp< I 01011010 90 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 IEIEEIEI
TRB Tribesman Sp< Sp> P 01100110 102 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 PJJPPJJP
CST Contrast Cnt J 10011001 153 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 JPPJJPPJ
EGM Enigma Ego NT 00110011 51 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 CCWWCCWW
STM Suitemate Bn< Bn> NF 01010101 85 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 CWCWCWCW
ADV Advisor Bn> Bn< ST 10101010 170 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 WCWCWCWC
PED Pedagogue Sdl Ill SF 11001100 204 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 WWCCWWCC
CHR Cohort Ill Sdl
NVL Novelty Cnf EE 10100101 165 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 EIEIIEIE
SPP Supplement Act II 01011010 90 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 IEIEEIEI
ANI Anima Dlt EI/IE 11111111 255 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EEEEEEEE
PP 01100110 102 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 PJJPPJJP
Cognitive Function Colors JJ 10011001 153 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 JPPJJPPJ
(Back) (Text-I/E) PJ/JP 11111111 255 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 JJJJJJJJ
Red E 255 Ti 0,255,0 255,255,255 NT/NT 00110011 51 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 CCWWCCWW
I 0 Te 255,255,0 0,0,0 NT/NF 01110111 119 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 CWWWCWWW
Green T 255 Fi 0,0,255 255,255,255 NT/ST 10111011 187 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 WCWWWCWW
N 127 Fe 255,0,255 0,0,0 NT/SF 11111111 255 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WWWWWWWW
S 63 Si 0,63,127 255,255,255 NF/NF 01010101 85 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 CWCWCWCW
F 0 Se 255,63,127 0,0,0 NF/ST 11111111 255 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WWWWWWWW
Blue F 255 Ni 0,127,63 255,255,255 NF/SF 11011101 221 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 WWCWWWCW
S 127 Ne 255,127,63 0,0,0 ST/ST 10101010 170 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 WCWCWCWC
N 63 ST/SF 11101110 238 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 WWWCWWWC
T 0

5A6633 5A6655 5A66AA 5A66CC 5A9933 5A9955 5A99AA 5A99CC A56633 A56655 A566AA A566CC A59933 A59955 A599B4 A599CC
INTP ISTP INFP ISFP INTJ INFJ ISTJ ISFJ ENTP ENFP ESTP ESFP ENTJ ESTJ ENFJ ESFJ
5924403 INTP IDT NBR CMP EGM CPL ADV STM SPP PAL TRB CTP NVL CST CHR PED ANI
5924437 ISTP NBR IDT EGM CMP STM SPP CMP ADV CTP NVL PAL TRB CHR CST ANI PED
5924522 INFP CMP EGM IDT NBR ADV CMP SPP STM TRB PAL NVL CTP PED ANI CST CHR
5924556 ISFP EGM CMP NBR IDT SPP STM ADV CPL NVL CTP TRB PAL ANI PED CHR CST
5937459 INTJ CPL STM ADV SPP IDT CMP NBR EGM CST PED CHR ANI PAL CTP TRB NVL
5937493 INFJ ADV SPP CMP STM CMP IDT EGM NBR PED CST ANI CHR TRB NVL PAL CTP
5937578 ISTJ STM CMP SPP ADV NBR EGM IDT CMP CHR ANI CST PED CTP PAL NVL TRB
5937612 ISFJ SPP ADV STM CPL EGM NBR CMP IDT ANI CHR PED CST NVL TRB CTP PAL
10839603 ENTP PAL CTP TRB NVL CST PED CHR ANI IDT CMP NBR EGM CPL STM ADV SPP
10839637 ENFP TRB NVL PAL CTP PED CST ANI CHR CMP IDT EGM NBR ADV SPP CMP STM
10839722 ESTP CTP PAL NVL TRB CHR ANI CST PED NBR EGM IDT CMP STM CMP SPP ADV
10839756 ESFP NVL TRB CTP PAL ANI CHR PED CST EGM NBR CMP IDT SPP ADV STM CPL
10852659 ENTJ CST CHR PED ANI PAL TRB CTP NVL CPL PED STM SPP IDT NBR CMP EGM
10852693 ESTJ CHR CST ANI PED CTP NVL PAL TRB STM SPP CMP ADV NBR IDT EGM CMP
10852788 ENFJ PED ANI CST CHR TRB PAL NVL CTP ADV CPL SPP STM CMP EGM IDT NBR
10852812 ESFJ ANI PED CHR CST NVL CTP TRB PAL SPP STM ADV CPL EGM CMP NBR IDT
134217730

Supervision Rings (Clockwise) Benefit Rings (Clockwise)

TRB ENTP CTP STM ENTP ADV

INFP EGM ISTP ESTJ EGM ENFJ
CTP ESFP TRB ADV ESFP STM

TRB ISFJ CTP STM ISFJ ADV

ESTJ EGM ENFJ INFP EGM ISTP
CTP INTJ TRB ADV INTJ STM

CTP ESFJ TRB ADV ESFJ STM

INFJ EGM ISTJ ESTP EGM ENFP
TRB ENTJ CTP STM ENTJ ADV

CTP INTP TRB ADV INTP STM

ESTP EGM ENFP INFJ EGM ISTJ
TRB ISFP CTP STM ISFP ADV

(EGM here looks like NVL/PAL) (EGM here looks like CMP/SPP)

A\B ENTP ISFJ ESFJ INTP ENFJ ISTP ESTP INFJ ESFP INTJ ENTJ ISFP ESTJ INFP ENFP ISTJ
ENTP IDT ANI SPP PAL ADV CTP NBR PED EGM CST CPL NVL STM TRB CMP CHR
ISFJ ANI IDT PAL SPP CTP ADV PED NBR CST EGM NVL CPL TRB STM CHR CMP
ESFJ SPP PAL IDT ANI NBR PED ADV CTP CPL NVL EGM CST CMP CHR STM TRB
INTP PAL SPP ANI IDT PED NBR CTP ADV NVL CPL CST EGM CHR CMP TRB STM
ENFJ ADV CTP NBR PED IDT ANI SPP PAL STM TRB CMP CHR EGM CST CPL NVL
ISTP CTP ADV PED NBR ANI IDT PAL SPP TRB STM CHR CMP CST EGM NVL CPL
ESTP NBR PED ADV CTP SPP PAL IDT ANI CMP CHR STM TRB CPL NVL EGM CST
INFJ PED NBR CTP ADV PAL SPP ANI IDT CHR CMP TRB STM NVL CPL CST EGM
ESFP EGM CST CPL NVL STM TRB CMP CHR IDT ANI SPP PAL ADV CTP NBR PED
INTJ CST EGM NVL CPL TRB STM CHR CMP ANI IDT PAL SPP CTP ADV PED NBR
ENTJ CPL NVL EGM CST CMP CHR STM TRB SPP PAL IDT ANI NBR PED ADV CTP
ISFP NVL CPL CST EGM CHR CMP TRB STM PAL SPP ANI IDT PED NBR CTP ADV
ESTJ STM TRB CMP CHR EGM CST CPL NVL ADV CTP NBR PED IDT ANI SPP PAL
INFP TRB STM CHR CMP CST EGM NVL CPL CTP ADV PED NBR ANI IDT PAL SPP
ENFP CMP CHR STM TRB CPL NVL EGM CST NBR PED ADV CTP SPP PAL IDT ANI
ISTJ CHR CMP TRB STM NVL CPL CST EGM PED NBR CTP ADV PAL SPP ANI IDT
 INTP ISTP INFP ISFP
IDT Hero Introverted Thinking Ti Hero Introverted Thinking Ti Hero Introverted Feeling Fi Hero Introverted Feeling Fi
PED Parent Extraverted Intuition Ne Parent Extraverted Sensing Se Parent Extraverted Intuition Ne Parent Extraverted Sensing Se
ADV Child Introverted Sensing Si Child Introverted Intuition Ni Child Introverted Sensing Si Child Introverted Intuition Ni
ANI Animus Extraverted Feeling Fe Animus Extraverted Feeling Fe Animus Extraverted Thinking Te Animus Extraverted Thinking Te
CST Opposing Extraverted Thinking Te Opposing Extraverted Thinking Te Opposing Extraverted Feeling Fe Opposing Extraverted Feeling Fe
CTP Critical Introverted Intuition Ni Critical Introverted Sensing Si Critical Introverted Intuition Ni Critical Introverted Sensing Si
EGM Deceiving Extraverted Sensing Se Deceiving Extraverted Intuition Ne Deceiving Extraverted Sensing Se Deceiving Extraverted Intuition Ne
NVL Devilish Introverted Feeling Fi Devilish Introverted Feeling Fi Devilish Introverted Thinking Ti Devilish Introverted Thinking Ti

INTJ INFJ ISTJ ISFJ

IDT Hero Introverted Intuition Ni Hero Introverted Intuition Ni Hero Introverted Sensing Si Hero Introverted Sensing Si
PED Parent Extraverted Thinking Te Parent Extraverted Feeling Fe Parent Extraverted Thinking Te Parent Extraverted Feeling Fe
ADV Child Introverted Feeling Fi Child Introverted Thinking Ti Child Introverted Feeling Fi Child Introverted Thinking Ti
ANI Animus Extraverted Sensing Se Animus Extraverted Sensing Se Animus Extraverted Intuition Ne Animus Extraverted Intuition Ne
CST Opposing Extraverted Intuition Ne Opposing Extraverted Intuition Ne Opposing Extraverted Sensing Se Opposing Extraverted Sensing Se
CTP Critical Introverted Thinking Ti Critical Introverted Feeling Fi Critical Introverted Thinking Ti Critical Introverted Feeling Fi
EGM Deceiving Extraverted Feeling Fe Deceiving Extraverted Thinking Te Deceiving Extraverted Feeling Fe Deceiving Extraverted Thinking Te
NVL Devilish Introverted Sensing Si Devilish Introverted Sensing Si Devilish Introverted Intuition Ni Devilish Introverted Intuition Ni

ENTP ENFP ESTP ESFP

IDT Hero Extraverted Intuition Ne Hero Extraverted Intuition Ne Hero Extraverted Sensing Se Hero Extraverted Sensing Se
PED Parent Introverted Thinking Ti Parent Introverted Feeling Fi Parent Introverted Thinking Ti Parent Introverted Feeling Fi
ADV Child Extraverted Feeling Fe Child Extraverted Thinking Te Child Extraverted Feeling Fe Child Extraverted Thinking Te
ANI Animus Introverted Sensing Si Animus Introverted Sensing Si Animus Introverted Intuition Ni Animus Introverted Intuition Ni
CST Opposing Introverted Intuition Ni Opposing Introverted Intuition Ni Opposing Introverted Sensing Si Opposing Introverted Sensing Si
CTP Critical Extraverted Thinking Te Critical Extraverted Feeling Fe Critical Extraverted Thinking Te Critical Extraverted Feeling Fe
EGM Deceiving Introverted Feeling Fi Deceiving Introverted Thinking Ti Deceiving Introverted Feeling Fi Deceiving Introverted Thinking Ti
NVL Devilish Extraverted Sensing Se Devilish Extraverted Sensing Se Devilish Extraverted Intuition Ne Devilish Extraverted Intuition Ne

ENTJ ESTJ ENFJ ESFJ

IDT Hero Extraverted Thinking Te Hero Extraverted Thinking Te Hero Extraverted Feeling Fe Hero Extraverted Feeling Fe
PED Parent Introverted Intuition Ni Parent Introverted Sensing Si Parent Introverted Intuition Ni Parent Introverted Sensing Si
ADV Child Extraverted Sensing Se Child Extraverted Intuition Ne Child Extraverted Sensing Se Child Extraverted Intuition Ne
ANI Animus Introverted Feeling Fi Animus Introverted Feeling Fi Animus Introverted Thinking Ti Animus Introverted Thinking Ti
CST Opposing Introverted Thinking Ti Opposing Introverted Thinking Ti Opposing Introverted Feeling Fi Opposing Introverted Feeling Fi
CTP Critical Extraverted Intuition Ne Critical Extraverted Sensing Se Critical Extraverted Intuition Ne Critical Extraverted Sensing Se
EGM Deceiving Introverted Sensing Si Deceiving Introverted Intuition Ni Deceiving Introverted Sensing Si Deceiving Introverted Intuition Ni
NVL Devilish Extraverted Feeling Fe Devilish Extraverted Feeling Fe Devilish Extraverted Thinking Te Devilish Extraverted Thinking Te

Function Hero Connection Metaphor ex.INTP

Hero Idn IDT Hero
Parent Sp> PED Parent
Child Act ADV Child
Animus Dlt Sdl ANI Animus
Opposing Cnt Ill CST Opposing
Critical Qid Bn> CTP Critical
Deceiving Cnf Sp< EGM Deceiving
Devilish Lkl Ego NVL Devilish

INTP - D2
ISTP - H2
INFP - L2
ISFP - P2
INTJ - D14
INFJ - H14
ISTJ - L14
ISFJ - P14
ENTP - D26
ENFP - H26
ESTP - L26
ESFP - P26
ENTJ - D38
ESTJ - H38
ENFJ - L38
ESFJ - P38
 B12 B10
16 16
'MBTI-Type-Functions'! ENFP CMP ENFP 'MBTI-Type-Functions'!
INTP - D2 TRB Companion PAL INFP - L2
INTP Cognitive Relationship INFP
(Thinker) (Idealist)
D4 Hero Introverted Thinking Ti Hero Introverted Feeling Fi L4
D5 Parent Extraverted Intuition Ne Parent Extraverted Intuition Ne L5
D6 Child Introverted Sensing Si Child Introverted Sensing Si L6
D7 Animus Extraverted Feeling Fe Animus Extraverted Thinking Te L7
D8 Opposing Extraverted Thinking Te Opposing Extraverted Feeling Fe L8
D9 Critical Introverted Intuition Ni Critical Introverted Intuition Ni L9
D10 Deceiving Extraverted Sensing Se Deceiving Extraverted Sensing Se L10
D11 Devilish Introverted Feeling Fi Devilish Introverted Thinking Ti L11
8 Sp> Lkl Cnf 6
INTP - D2 A6 Look-a-like A16
ISTP - H2 17 12 9
INFP - L2 ENFP 10 ESTP
ISFP - P2 B2 Description:
INTJ - D14
These are relations between equal partners which can be called acquaintances rather than friends. There are no visual obstacles in the
development of these relations, partners can talk easily almost about anything. Look-a-like partners do not feel any danger from the other
partner. The strong sides of the partners are different in the such a way that almost any conversations between them always fall into the area
of the confidence of only one of the partners. Look-a-like partners also have similar problems which makes them feel rather sympathetic
towards each other instead of being critical of each other's vulnerabilities.

Understanding between partners is usually good. Collaboration between them may be very fruitful especially if partners feel a mutual
attraction. When partners lose their feeling of sympathy for each other through anger or any other reason, they can apply pressure to their
partner's vulnerabilities. This can sometimes be really unexpected and unpleasant for both partners.

Arguments in Look-a-like relations are not common practice. The partners usually try to help each other, or at least feel when their partner
requires some form of assistance. However, in many cases the help is not effective enough because partners have similar problems. Look-a-
like relations have an average degree of comfort. Partners do not have anything against each other but also nothing for which to struggle.
These relations can normally bring a feeling of satisfaction from interaction with an equal and not boring partner.
 A\B ENTP ISFJ ESFJ INTP ENFJ ISTP ESTP INFJ ESFP INTJ ENTJ ISFP ESTJ INFP ENFP ISTJ
ENTP IDT ANI SPP PAL ADV CTP NBR PED EGM CST CPL NVL STM TRB CMP CHR
ISFJ ANI IDT PAL SPP CTP ADV PED NBR CST EGM NVL CPL TRB STM CHR CMP
ESFJ SPP PAL IDT ANI NBR PED ADV CTP CPL NVL EGM CST CMP CHR STM TRB
INTP PAL SPP ANI IDT PED NBR CTP ADV NVL CPL CST EGM CHR CMP TRB STM
ENFJ ADV CTP NBR PED IDT ANI SPP PAL STM TRB CMP CHR EGM CST CPL NVL
ISTP CTP ADV PED NBR ANI IDT PAL SPP TRB STM CHR CMP CST EGM NVL CPL
ESTP NBR PED ADV CTP SPP PAL IDT ANI CMP CHR STM TRB CPL NVL EGM CST
INFJ PED NBR CTP ADV PAL SPP ANI IDT CHR CMP TRB STM NVL CPL CST EGM
ESFP EGM CST CPL NVL STM TRB CMP CHR IDT ANI SPP PAL ADV CTP NBR PED
INTJ CST EGM NVL CPL TRB STM CHR CMP ANI IDT PAL SPP CTP ADV PED NBR
ENTJ CPL NVL EGM CST CMP CHR STM TRB SPP PAL IDT ANI NBR PED ADV CTP
ISFP NVL CPL CST EGM CHR CMP TRB STM PAL SPP ANI IDT PED NBR CTP ADV
ESTJ STM TRB CMP CHR EGM CST CPL NVL ADV CTP NBR PED IDT ANI SPP PAL
INFP TRB STM CHR CMP CST EGM NVL CPL CTP ADV PED NBR ANI IDT PAL SPP
ENFP CMP CHR STM TRB CPL NVL EGM CST NBR PED ADV CTP SPP PAL IDT ANI
ISTJ CHR CMP TRB STM NVL CPL CST EGM PED NBR CTP ADV PAL SPP ANI IDT

KEY Conversion: Supervision Rings Benefit Rings

IDT Identity Idn
PAL Pal Mrr ENTP > ISTP > ESFP > INFP… ENTP ENTP > ENFJ > ESFP > ESTJ… ENTP
NBR Neighbor Lkl Cmp (ENTp > ISTj > ESFp > INFj… ENTp) (ENTp > ENFj > ESFp > ESTj… ENTp)
CMP Companion Cmp Lkl
CPL Complement Qid ISFJ > ENFJ > INTJ > ESTJ… ISFJ ISFJ > ISTP > INTJ > INFP… ISFJ
CTP Counterpart Sp> Sp< (ISFp > ENFj > INTp > ESTj… ISFp) (ISFp > ISTj > INTp > INFj… ISFp)
TRB Tribesman Sp< Sp>
CST Contrast Cnt ESFJ > ISTJ > ENTJ > INFJ… ESFJ ESFJ > ENFP > ENTJ > ESTP… ESFJ
EGM Enigma Ego (ESFj > ISTp > ENTj > INFp... ESFj) (ESFj > ENFp > ENTj > ESTp… ESFj)
STM Suitemate Bn< Bn>
ADV Advisor Bn> Bn< INTP > ENFP > ISFP > ESTP… INTP INTP > ISTJ > ISFP > INFJ… INTP
PED Pedagogue Sdl Ill (INTj > ENFp > ISFj > ESTp... INTj) (INTj > ISTp > ISFj > INFp… INTj)
CHR Cohort Ill Sdl
NVL Novelty Cnf
SPP Supplement Act
ANI Anima Dlt
Quasi-Identity Conflicts Benefit Conflicts (A)
IxxJ IxxP
NBR Lkl Cmp Judge(=), Perceive(!=) E E
CMP Cmp Lkl Perceive(=), Judge(!=) ANI CPL Sdl Bn
I NVL E I NVL E
ExxJ ExxP CPL ANI Bn Ill
NBR Cmp Lkl Judge(=), Perceive(!=) I I
CMP Lkl Cmp Perceive(=), Judge(!=)
 Cmp and Lkl relationship description seems Identity Conflicts Benefit Conflicts (B)
I-centered. Swap descriptions for E.
E E
xxxJ xxxP NVL IDT Ill Bn
(N/S) CTP Sp Sp Judge(=), Perceive(!=) I NVL E I NVL E
(T/F) TRB Sp Sp Perceive(=), Judge(!=) IDT NVL Bn Sdl
I I
P: I over (Sp>) E is better than E over I
J: E over (Sp>) I is better than I over E
Contrast Conflicts Supervision Conflicts (A)
xxxJ xxxP
STM Bn< Bn> Perceive(=), Judge(!=) E E
ADV Bn> Bn< Judge(=), Perceive(!=) CST SPP Sp Lkl
I NVL E I NVL E
Benefactor always more comfortable than SPP CST Cmp Sp
the Beneficiary. I I

IxxJ IxxP
PED Ill Sdl Judge(=), Perceive(!=) Ego Conflicts Supervision Conflicts (B)
CHR Sdl Ill Perceive(=), Judge(!=)
E E
ExxJ ExxP PAL EGM Sp Cmp
PED Sdl Ill Judge(=), Perceive(!=) I NVL E I NVL E
CHR Ill Sdl Perceive(=), Judge(!=) EGM PAL Lkl Sp
I I
Since PED and CHR are always between I and E
 ENTP ISFJ ESFJ INTP ENFJ ISTP ESTP INFJ ESFP INTJ ENTJ ISFP ESTJ INFP ENFP ISTJ
A\B ENTp ISFp ESFj INTj ENFj ISTj ESTp INFp ESFp INTp ENTj ISFj ESTj INFj ENFp ISTp
ENTP ENTp Idn Dlt Act Mrr Bn> Sp> Lkl Ill Ego Cnt Qid Cnf Bn< Sp< Cmp Sdl
ISFJ ISFp Dlt Idn Mrr Act Sp> Bn> Ill Lkl Cnt Ego Cnf Qid Sp< Bn< Sdl Cmp
ESFJ ESFj Act Mrr Idn Dlt Cmp Sdl Bn< Sp< Qid Cnf Ego Cnt Lkl Ill Bn> Sp>
INTP INTj Mrr Act Dlt Idn Sdl Cmp Sp< Bn< Cnf Qid Cnt Ego Ill Lkl Sp> Bn>
ENFJ ENFj Bn< Sp< Cmp Sdl Idn Dlt Act Mrr Bn> Sp> Lkl Ill Ego Cnt Qid Cnf
ISTP ISTj Sp< Bn< Sdl Cmp Dlt Idn Mrr Act Sp> Bn> Ill Lkl Cnt Ego Cnf Qid
ESTP ESTp Lkl Ill Bn> Sp> Act Mrr Idn Dlt Cmp Sdl Bn< Sp< Qid Cnf Ego Cnt
INFJ INFp Ill Lkl Sp> Bn> Mrr Act Dlt Idn Sdl Cmp Sp< Bn< Cnf Qid Cnt Ego
ESFP ESFp Ego Cnt Qid Cnf Bn< Sp< Cmp Sdl Idn Dlt Act Mrr Bn> Sp> Lkl Ill
INTJ INTp Cnt Ego Cnf Qid Sp< Bn< Sdl Cmp Dlt Idn Mrr Act Sp> Bn> Ill Lkl
ENTJ ENTj Qid Cnf Ego Cnt Lkl Ill Bn> Sp> Act Mrr Idn Dlt Cmp Sdl Bn< Sp<
ISFP ISFj Cnf Qid Cnt Ego Ill Lkl Sp> Bn> Mrr Act Dlt Idn Sdl Cmp Sp< Bn<
ESTJ ESTj Bn> Sp> Lkl Ill Ego Cnt Qid Cnf Bn< Sp< Cmp Sdl Idn Dlt Act Mrr
INFP INFj Sp> Bn> Ill Lkl Cnt Ego Cnf Qid Sp< Bn< Sdl Cmp Dlt Idn Mrr Act
ENFP ENFp Cmp Sdl Bn< Sp< Qid Cnf Ego Cnt Lkl Ill Bn> Sp> Act Mrr Idn Dlt
ISTJ ISTp Sdl Cmp Sp< Bn< Cnf Qid Cnt Ego Ill Lkl Sp> Bn> Mrr Act Dlt Idn

KEY Conversion: Supervision Rings Benefit Rings

Idn Identity IDT
Mrr Mirror PAL ENTp > ISTj > ESFp > INFj… ENTp ENTp > ENFj > ESFp > ESTj… ENTp
Lkl Look-a-like NBR CMP (ENTP > ISTP > ESFP > INFP… ENTP) (ENTP > ENFJ > ESFP > ESTJ… ENTP)
Cmp Comparison CMP NBR
Qid Quasi-Identity CPL ISFp > ENFj > INTp > ESTj… ISFp ISFp > ISTj > INTp > INFj… ISFp
Sp> Supervisor CTP TRB (ISFJ > ENFJ > INTJ > ESTJ… ISFJ) (ISFJ > ISTP > INTJ > INFP… ISFJ)
Sp< Supervisee TRB CTP
Cnt Contrast CST ESFj > ISTp > ENTj > INFp... ESFj ESFj > ENFp > ENTj > ESTp… ESFj
Ego Super-Ego EGM (ESFJ > ISTJ > ENTJ > INFJ… ESFJ) (ESFJ > ENFP > ENTJ > ESTP… ESFJ)
Bn< Beneficiary STM ADV
Bn> Benefactor ADV STM INTj > ENFp > ISFj > ESTp... INTj) INTj > ISTp > ISFj > INFp… INTj
Sdl Semi-Duality PED CHR (INTP > ENFP > ISFP > ESTP… INTP) (INTP > ISTJ > ISFP > INFJ… INTP)
Ill Illusion CHR PED
Cnf Conflict NVL
Act Activation SPP
Dlt Duality ANI
Quasi-Identity Conflicts Benefit Conflicts (A)

E E
Dlt Qid Sdl Bn
I Cnf E I Cnf E
Qid Dlt Bn Ill
I I
 Identity Conflicts Benefit Conflicts (B)

E E
Cnf Idn Ill Bn
I Cnf E I Cnf E
Idn Cnf Bn Sdl
I I

Contrast Conflicts Supervision Conflicts (A)

E E
Cnt Act Sp Lkl
I Cnf E I Cnf E
Act Cnt Cmp Sp
I I

Ego Conflicts Supervision Conflicts (B)

E E
Mrr Ego Sp Cmp
I Cnf E I Cnf E
Ego Mrr Lkl Sp
I I
 These are relations of complete understanding between partners but with an inability to help each other. Identical partners see the world with identical eyes, identically work out received information, come to identical conclusions and have identical
problems. Identical partners usually experience sympathy towards each other, trying to support and justify each other.

Identical relations have a negative side too. Interaction with an Identical partner may quickly become boring unless partners have common interests, working on the same project, or if one partner has sufficient preponderance in knowledge so a teacher
and student situation can develop. Usually when partners do not receive any new information from each other they find no use in such interaction and their relations can become neutral.

Identity However, periodically even neutral relations come alive for a short period of time. It happens when partners discover new things about each other. If Identical partners feel a mutual attraction to each other their relations can be really loving and caring.

In order for Identical relations to last, one partner has to take a role of the Dualas if it was a Duality relationship. Usually it happens naturally. If the two are introverts, one often subconsciously attempts to take care of the extrovertedside of things, if the
two are thinking types, then one would try to fill the resulting emotional void etc. Different backgrounds and function developments of Identical partners could help in this case, however as with any other relationship there has to be a driving force behind
it to keep it going.

The result of Identical relations is self-development, because these relations can help you to look at your own abilities and disabilities from a different angle. Identical relations can be compared with watching a video of oneself. In conclusion, only these
relations can provide a person with correct self-evaluation.
These are relations between equal partners which can be called acquaintances rather than friends. There are no visual obstacles in the development of these relations, partners can talk easily almost about anything. Look-a-like partners do not feel any
danger from the other partner. The strong sides of the partners are different in the such a way that almost any conversations between them always fall into the area of the confidence of only one of the partners. Look-a-like partners also have similar
problems which makes them feel rather sympathetic towards each other instead of being critical of each other's vulnerabilities.

Understanding between partners is usually good. Collaboration between them may be very fruitful especially if partners feel a mutual attraction. When partners lose their feeling of sympathy for each other through anger or any other reason, they can
Look-a-like
apply pressure to their partner's vulnerabilities. This can sometimes be really unexpected and unpleasant for both partners.

Arguments in Look-a-like relations are not common practice. The partners usually try to help each other, or at least feel when their partner requires some form of assistance. However, in many cases the help is not effective enough because partners have
similar problems. Look-a-like relations have an average degree of comfort. Partners do not have anything against each other but also nothing for which to struggle. These relations can normally bring a feeling of satisfaction from interaction with an equal
and not boring partner.

These are relations of an unstable psychological distance. Both partners experience difficulties in establishing and keeping a stable psychological distance between them. The only chance Contrary partners have to get on together well with each other is if
they are left alone. In other cases partners usually compete over their strong sides. The reason for this is when somebody else is present, each partner tries to capture the attention of the listener by showing off their strong side. Contrary partners may
like some elements of the other partner's behaviour. This often helps the partners to begin a more close relationship. However, when they are in company, their interaction can change dramatically. The introvert partner usually becomes distant, relations
lose warm feelings and become formal and cautious. Both partners may start regretting that they became too trustful.
Contrast
The extrovert partner normally gets the false impression that the introvert partner is deliberately acting against them. This can bring a great deal of misunderstanding and surprise into these relations, as both partners are convinced that before everything
was fine. The introvert partner usually starts suppressing the activity of the extrovert partner and may reproach and criticise them. The extrovert partner in return can behave in the same way.

The most vulnerable position in these relations belongs to the extrovert partner, who may feel as if they are being betrayed. As a result the extrovert partner could start to worry excessively about their next step so as not to make any mistakes and may
therefore become very suspicious. Unfortunately the extrovert partner cannot see that their introvert partner is not as bad as they have begun to imagine.

These relations are the most favourable and comfortable of all intertype relationsproviding complete psychological compatibility. Dual partners are like two halves of a whole unit. They usually understand each others intentions without any need to say a
word. Dual will naturally protect your weak points and appreciate the strong ones without asking for anything in return. Interaction with your Dual allows you to be yourself without the need to adjust to your partner like in other relations. This often saves
both partners a lot of energy which they can use for their own interesting activities. Conflicts between Duals are very rare and if there are any, they are normally short lived and solved without pain. Your Dual partner will love you just for what you are and
if there is such a thing as true love then it could probably only occur in relations of Duality.

However, let's not idealise these relations too much. Although theoretically relations of Duality are the best of the best, practically not everybody who is your Dual will make your dreams come true. The reason for this is that we are usually so twisted up
Duality during the course of our lives that our already formed and stable views and attitudes can affect our relationships quite heavily. In fact, younger people have more chance to succeed in the quest for their perfect partner than older people. But the chances
are always there.

There are at least two conditions to be completed for a successful relationship between Duals. Firstly between the partners there has to be at least a minimal mutual attraction. Secondly and most importantly is that the partners are truly striving for the
same or similar things. This may include common interests and/or life goals. Partners that are both seriously thinking about building a family are a good example. Logically saying: two halves of the same whole must not repel or move in the different
directions, otherwise the whole will break into pieces. Relations of Duality also go through several stages. The first stage sometimes can be really tense. It is like a new engine that requires a "run in" first. If relations crumble it normally happens in the first
stage. The more stages completed by Duals the more unbreakable their relationship.
 These are relations of deficient Duality. Semi-Duality partners usually have no problems in understanding each other or each other's objectives, at least when these objectives are only on paper. When it comes to fulfilling joint plans, partners often fail to
co-operate. The extrovertpartner hardly listens to the introvert, concentrating more on the sound of their own voice. However, the introvert partner does not get upset about this and they often seem to find a way to adapt to it. Semi-Duals usually have
many topics for conversation and these conversations do not seem to be boring.

Semi-Duals, especially if they are different in gender, can show interest in each other, which is multiplied if in addition they find each other attractive. However, when they feel like they are half way to complete understanding, one of them usually does
Semi-Duality something, not deliberately of course, that ruins all established harmony putting the partners right back to where they started. This is how incomplete Duality manifests itself.

Semi-Duality partners cannot stay upset with each other for a long time. After partners have calmed down, they attempt to get closer to each other again which unfortunately leads to another stumble. For the observer, these relations may seem really
passionate and loving. Relations of Semi-Duality can be compared with the moth and the flame.

If not taken seriously, these relations can produce a little periodical shaking, keeping the partners "awake". Relations of Semi-Duality are also full of contrasts: from being happy to see partner again to sudden disappointment and bewilderment.

These are relations of constantly developing conflict. Conflicting relations have the worst compatibility between partners among all other relations. However, it does not seem to be so obvious, especially in the earlier stages of development. Conflicting
partners appear rather attractive, interesting and with impressive abilities.

Both partners are usually convinced that they can coexist and collaborate quite peacefully, but soon it becomes apparent that something is always going wrong, making their relationship problematic. Both partners may mistakenly think that the cause of
these problems is minor and easily fixed and that all they need to do is to show a little bit more effort in understanding their partner.
Conflict
Unfortunately, these attempts to continue pushing their relationship any further will soon provoke an open conflict between the partners. When conflict starts, partners hit each other with arguments exactly in the direction where they can cause
maximum pain. In return, the other partner may counterattack even more aggressively. With every conflict these relations become worse and worse.

Although Conflicting partners show confidence where their partner is unconfident, they are unable to protect and take care of each other's weak points. This regularly brings disagreement and disappointment into these relations. When after several
fruitless attempts to establish a stable relationship the partners give up and break the relationship, they feel saved and released.

These relations are the easiest and quickest to start. Activity partners do not experience any visual difficulties when starting relations which can be surprising to them at the beginning. Partners stimulate each other into activity. Interaction with an Activity
partner becomes really satisfying especially if both partners feel a mutual attraction. However, with continuous interaction over a long period comes overactivation which normally results in an overall tiredness of each other (a good example is when you
watch a comedy that is so funny that after half the film you do not have the energy to laugh anymore). When this happens Activity partners need a short rest from each other, after which they can enjoy a positive interaction once again. This pattern
repeats itself giving these relations an oscillating character. If partners cannot take a break from each other, it can cause negative stimulation to take the place of positive.

Although overall interaction between partners is nice and easy, when it comes to fulfilling everyday duties and matters together, partners usually meet with many problems. Instead of solving the problems, Activity partners tend to give advice to each
other on how to solve these problems, often affecting each others weak points. The advice of an Activity partner is always useful as it can strengthen your weakness, but not so much that it will ever become your strength.
Activation
The other problem with these relations is that information between Activity partners always needs some adjustments. One partner may think of it as too foggy and not concrete enough, whereas for the other partner it is too unrefined. Collaboration is
also difficult, because partners cannot predict each others behaviour and actions in what seem to be ordinary situations. Because of this, partners cannot rely or count on each other in full. Most of the problems that arise during Activity relationships are
because one partner is always Perceiving and the other is always Judging, meaning that they live in different life rhythms.

These relations are excellent for leisure, but not for day to day activities. When two Duality pairs gather together (forming a complete Quadrable) they experience a feeling of elation. The reason for this is that when two Duality pairs interact with each
other, the two introverts (one from each Duality pair) and the two extroverts (again, one from each Duality pair) interact with each other as relations of Activity. Introverts in relations of Activity become slightly extroverted and more open, whereas two
extroverts will often calm down a little.
 These are relations of deceptive similarity. Comparative partners talk about similar things, have similar interests, obey the norms of politeness and hospitality towards each other but they never really show an interest in each others problems. After a
while these relations can become boring and stagnant. When comparative partners are on the same level in a hierarchy, they can coexist quite peacefully. Once one partner becomes superior to the other, they may have serious disagreements and
conflicts. Comparative partners look at the same questions from very different angles. One partner feels as if the other is in their opinion trying to solve the same problem in an impractical manner. Moreover, partners are not happy to acknowledge each
other's different point of view. This may cause great misunderstandings between partners, especially when applied to methods of working and as a result partners usually try to compromise.
Comparison
When in company, Comparative relations can improve a little. The reason for this is that the behaviour of one partner in respect to other people usually appears to the other partner as interesting and worthwhile. Moreover, partners have a good chance
to learn from each other how to better improve their social interactions.

When Comparative partners ask each other for advice, the adviser often finds their own advice quite useful for themselves. As a result the person who asked for advice usually leaves with nothing. Comparative partners may view each other as selfish and
egoistic, however they do not try to clarify this point to each other. In a family environment these relations are very heavy, as they can create a mistrust between partners and do not allow them to feel their own significance.

These are relations of mutual respect between partners. Super-Ego partners may think of each other as a distant and slightly mysterious ideal. They often show interest in each other's manners, behaviour and thought composition. Both partners
experience a warm feeling towards each other, but for the outsider, these relations may look cold.

If Super-Ego partners cannot find common interests, their interaction can become very formal. Partners normally think more about expressing their own point of view than listening to their partner. This expression comes from the confident side of one of
the partners reaching the unconfident side of the other partner. The latter tries to defend themselves by projecting their confident points in return. Partners normally show interest and respect to each other if they do not know each other well enough.
Super-Ego When partners start more close interaction, they start experiencing many problems.

Super-Ego partners may think that they understand each other well. However, when it comes to day to day matters or co-operative activity, partners start thinking that their partner is deliberately trying to do everything wrong. Super-Ego partners are not
interested and do not make each other aware of their intentions. Therefore their actions may look exactly opposite to what was expected. Although the hope and the feeling between partners may remain as before, it does not prevent the conflicts
penetrating their relationship.

When both partners are extroverts, one of them usually feels more unsatisfied with their position. The explanation for this is that they believe that the other partner does not pay as much attention to them as they should and are too occupied with their
These are relations of mutual correction. Mirror partners have similar interests and ideas, but a slightly different understanding of the same problems. Each partner can see only half of one problem. Therefore the partners always find what the other
partner is thinking interesting. Usually partners quickly realise that they are very like-minded.

The area of confidence of one partner is always the area of creativity for the other partner. What one partner considers solid and final appears incomplete and changeable for the other partner. This difference may often puzzle the partners especially
when they fulfil their mutual plans. It seems for them as if the other partner simply misunderstood the main concept. Therefore partners attempt to correct each other's understanding but usually fail, because each partner acts from their confident side.
Mirror
For the same reason, Mirror partners can be involved in really hot disputes and can even come to blows in the name of their opinion.

However, Mirror partners are often very good friends. When they work together on the same project, their mutual correction and adjustment becomes a constructive criticism that is usually accepted as useful. The main discomfort in these relations is
caused by the difference in Judgement and Perception between the partners. Mirror partners generally agree about setting near future goals, but disagree about global aims. Mirror relations usually lack warm atmosphere between partners. This situation
normally changes in presence of a third person who is Dual to one partner and an Activity partner to the other.

These are relations of growing laziness. There are no other intertype relationsthat can deactivate partners so much as Illusionary relations. Illusionary partners find it comfortable being relaxed together, discussing different subjects. What one partner is
talking about is always interesting, but in order to understand the partner better the other partner needs to force themselves. This difficulty in making an effort also makes achieving goals together almost impossible.

Mutual business or other activity is complicated, because Illusionary partners do not understand the reasons and motives of each other's actions. Whatever one partner tries to achieve usually appears insufficient and worthless to the other. Because
partners expect different kinds of activity from each other, they become negative and may criticise each other's intentions and objectives. For an observer, this misunderstanding between partners can appear to be humorous.
Illusion
The introvert partner usually tries to free themselves from the attempts of the extrovert partner to impose their opinions. The introverts seek independence. The extrovert partner wants to make their introvert partner into what they consider to be a
"normal person". Both partners are distrustful of each other abilities.

Disagreements in these relations are usually short because partners are drawn to each other. From time to time Illusionary relations become really warm and caring. It normally happens when partners work together but not on the same task. Partners
may feel inspired with the result of a successfully finished project, however when they try to start a new project, they again meet the same difficulties in co-operation.
 These are relations of major misunderstanding. Quasi-Identical partners can interact with each other in a more or less peaceful manner if both partners are Thinking types. If they are both Feeling types however, they are likely to have an argumentative
relationship. Also, as in the other relations, personal attraction can be very crucial to the peacefulness in their relationship. An absence of personal attraction may cause unnecessary internal tension resulting in conflict between partners. However these
arguments do not often last long. After both partners have released their internal tension, the Perceiving partner is usually the first to show the initiative in reconciliation.

A positive aspect of these relations is that Quasi-Identical partners do not underline your weak points and therefore are not viewed as dangerous by each other. Neither do they see each other as equal. Each partner sees the other as less capable than
themselves, hence less talented. However, Quasi-Identicals mistakenly believe that their partner is achieving more than they are. This is perceived by both partners as injustice and may hinder the ambitions of both.
Quasi-Identity
In these relations partners always have difficulty understanding each other in full. Quasi-Identical partners always need to convert each other's information in such a way that it corresponds with their own understanding. This conversion requires much
energy and does not bring the desired satisfaction. Books written by your Quasi-Identical are impossible to read. The creations of your Quasi-Identical look monstrous. Conversations with your Quasi-Identical, although not heavy, do not bring any
satisfaction either. One partner may think that the other partner complicates simple things and simplifies the important points, trying to deliberately confuse and mislead them. Both partners are convinced that whatever their partner was trying to say,
could be explained in a different and more understandable way.

Quasi-Identicals normally have no difficulties in finding topics for conversation or discussion. When it comes to solving problems together, Quasi-Identical partners begin to understand that they are both thinking in very different ways. Soon Quasi-
Identicals may start regretting the time that they have spent together, believing that it was just wasted time. Quasi-identical relations are very fragile and normally break without regret as there is usually nothing to resist their disunion.

These relations are asymmetrical. One partner, called the Benefactor, is always in a more favourable position in respect to the other partner who is known as Beneficiary.

The Beneficiary thinks of the Benefactor as an interesting and meaningful person, usually over-evaluating them in the beginning. The Beneficiary can be impressed and delighted by their partner's behaviour, manners, thoughts and their ability to easily
deal with things that the Beneficiary conceives as complicated. When partners are together, the Beneficiary involuntarily starts to ingratiate themselves with the Benefactor, trying to please them without any obvious reason. In the worst cases this starts
from little things and then becomes bigger until the Beneficiary realises the foolishness of their situation.

The Beneficiary can see the weakness of the Benefactor, wishing to help their partner to strengthen themselves. Because the strongest point of the Beneficiary is the weak and unconscious point of the Benefactor, the Beneficiary is convinced that they
are able to help. However, when the Beneficiary tries to help, the Benefactor usually refuses the help without any good explanation. The Beneficiary usually listens to every word the Benefactor says but there is no feedback, the Benefactor can not hear
Beneficiary
the Beneficiary. This may be sometimes unpleasant and even irritating for the Beneficiary.

The Benefactor accepts the Beneficiary as somebody who is lower in rank or social position and often undervalues them in the beginning. The reason for this is that the Benefactor feels that the Beneficiary needs something from them, that special
something that only the Benefactor can provide. Therefore the Benefactor naturally finds themselves in an advanced position in respect to the Beneficiary, but are at the same time willing to encourage and take care of the Beneficiary.

Relations of Benefit may appear even and conflict free. Usually it is the Benefactor who initiates the contact. Partners can even feel some kind of spiritual connection between them. However, relations last only as long as the Benefactor has something to
give and the Beneficiary has need of it. If this major condition is no longer fulfilled, relations enter quite an unpleasant stage of their development. The Beneficiary may begin ignoring the Benefactor completely or they may start to accentuate too many of
the Benefactors inability, provoking arguments and quarrels. Finally, when the Benefactor is in a superior position to the Beneficiary, it can work quite well, but not when it is the other way round!
 These relations are asymmetrical. One partner, called the Benefactor, is always in a more favourable position in respect to the other partner who is known as Beneficiary.

The Beneficiary thinks of the Benefactor as an interesting and meaningful person, usually over-evaluating them in the beginning. The Beneficiary can be impressed and delighted by their partner's behaviour, manners, thoughts and their ability to easily
deal with things that the Beneficiary conceives as complicated. When partners are together, the Beneficiary involuntarily starts to ingratiate themselves with the Benefactor, trying to please them without any obvious reason. In the worst cases this starts
from little things and then becomes bigger until the Beneficiary realises the foolishness of their situation.

The Beneficiary can see the weakness of the Benefactor, wishing to help their partner to strengthen themselves. Because the strongest point of the Beneficiary is the weak and unconscious point of the Benefactor, the Beneficiary is convinced that they
are able to help. However, when the Beneficiary tries to help, the Benefactor usually refuses the help without any good explanation. The Beneficiary usually listens to every word the Benefactor says but there is no feedback, the Benefactor can not hear
Benefactor
the Beneficiary. This may be sometimes unpleasant and even irritating for the Beneficiary.

The Benefactor accepts the Beneficiary as somebody who is lower in rank or social position and often undervalues them in the beginning. The reason for this is that the Benefactor feels that the Beneficiary needs something from them, that special
something that only the Benefactor can provide. Therefore the Benefactor naturally finds themselves in an advanced position in respect to the Beneficiary, but are at the same time willing to encourage and take care of the Beneficiary.

Relations of Benefit may appear even and conflict free. Usually it is the Benefactor who initiates the contact. Partners can even feel some kind of spiritual connection between them. However, relations last only as long as the Benefactor has something to
give and the Beneficiary has need of it. If this major condition is no longer fulfilled, relations enter quite an unpleasant stage of their development. The Beneficiary may begin ignoring the Benefactor completely or they may start to accentuate too many of
the Benefactors inability, provoking arguments and quarrels. Finally, when the Benefactor is in a superior position to the Beneficiary, it can work quite well, but not when it is the other way round!

These relations are also asymmetrical as are relations of Benefit. One partner, called the Supervisor, is always in a more favourable position in respect to the other partner who is known as Supervisee.

Relations of Supervision can give the impression that Supervisor is constantly watching every step of the Supervisee. The latter usually feels this control even if the Supervisor does not say or do anything. The explanation for this is that the Supervisee
weak point is defenceless against the Supervisor's strong point. This makes the Supervisee nervous and expect the worse.

Although the Supervisor can seem self-satisfied, petty, faultfinding and narrative, the Supervisee pays attention to their actions and considers the Supervisor as consequential. The Supervisee normally wants to gain recognition and commendation from
the Supervisor. However, it may seem like the Supervisor always undervalues the abilities of the Supervisee. This stimulates the Supervisee into proving their own worthiness with various actions, yet there is little chance that they will succeed.

Supervisor The Supervisor sees the Supervisee as quite interesting and capable, but incomplete and therefore in need of some help and advice. The Supervisee does not respond to this aid as expected and this will often increase the Supervisor's attempts to change
the Supervisee. Because the Supervisee naturally does not understand what it is that the Supervisor wants from them, this may irritate the Supervisor, who thinks that the Supervisee simply does not want to understand.

In relations of Supervision it may also appear as if the Supervisor patronises the Supervisee, which can be quite obtrusive for the latter. When there are more than two people present, the Supervisee often attempts to release themselves from the control
of the Supervisor by starting arguments for the sake of it or by attempting to manoeuvre themselves into the commanding position. Unfortunately, these attempts lead nowhere. The Supervisor may think instead that the Supervisee simply requires more
attention.

Supervision partners often look like good friends. The reason for this is that in these relations both partners can sense their social value: the Supervisor as a "guardian angel", without whom the Supervisee will get into trouble, and the Supervisee as the
object of attention.
 These relations are also asymmetrical as are relations of Benefit. One partner, called the Supervisor, is always in a more favourable position in respect to the other partner who is known as Supervisee.

Relations of Supervision can give the impression that Supervisor is constantly watching every step of the Supervisee. The latter usually feels this control even if the Supervisor does not say or do anything. The explanation for this is that the Supervisee
weak point is defenceless against the Supervisor's strong point. This makes the Supervisee nervous and expect the worse.

Although the Supervisor can seem self-satisfied, petty, faultfinding and narrative, the Supervisee pays attention to their actions and considers the Supervisor as consequential. The Supervisee normally wants to gain recognition and commendation from
the Supervisor. However, it may seem like the Supervisor always undervalues the abilities of the Supervisee. This stimulates the Supervisee into proving their own worthiness with various actions, yet there is little chance that they will succeed.

Supervisee The Supervisor sees the Supervisee as quite interesting and capable, but incomplete and therefore in need of some help and advice. The Supervisee does not respond to this aid as expected and this will often increase the Supervisor's attempts to change
the Supervisee. Because the Supervisee naturally does not understand what it is that the Supervisor wants from them, this may irritate the Supervisor, who thinks that the Supervisee simply does not want to understand.

In relations of Supervision it may also appear as if the Supervisor patronises the Supervisee, which can be quite obtrusive for the latter. When there are more than two people present, the Supervisee often attempts to release themselves from the control
of the Supervisor by starting arguments for the sake of it or by attempting to manoeuvre themselves into the commanding position. Unfortunately, these attempts lead nowhere. The Supervisor may think instead that the Supervisee simply requires more
attention.

Supervision partners often look like good friends. The reason for this is that in these relations both partners can sense their social value: the Supervisor as a "guardian angel", without whom the Supervisee will get into trouble, and the Supervisee as the
object of attention.
ISTJ Duty Fulfiller
ISTP Mechanic
ISFJ Nurturer
ISFP Artist
INFJ Protector
INFP Idealist
INTJ Scientist
INTP Thinker
ESTP Doer
ESTJ Guardian
ESFP Performer
ESFJ Caregiver
ENFP Inspirer
ENFJ Giver
ENTP Visionary
ENTJ Executive
 Identity Duality Activation Mirror
Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero
Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent
Child Child Child Child Child Child Child Child
Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus
Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing
Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical
Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving
Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish

Benefactor Beneficiary Supervisor Supervisee

Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero
Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent
Child Child Child Child Child Child Child Child
Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus
Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing
Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical
Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving
Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish

Look-a-like Illusion Super-Ego Contrast

Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero
Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent
Child Child Child Child Child Child Child Child
Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus
Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing
Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical
Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving
Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish

Quasi-Identity Conflict Comparison Semi-Duality

Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero Hero
Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent
Child Child Child Child Child Child Child Child
Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus Animus
Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing Opposing
Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical
Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving Deceiving
Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish Devilish
 H P C A O R D V H P C A O R D V
H H H H H P C A O R D V
P P P P H H
C C C C P P
A A A A C C
O O O O A A
R R R R O O
D D D D R R
V V V V D D
H P C A O R D V H P C A O R D V V V
Benefit Ring Quadra H P C A O R D V
Ego-Identity Ring

H P C A O R D V H P C A O R D V H P C A O R D V
H H H H H H
P P P P P P
C C C C C C
A A A A A A
O O O O O O
R R R R R R
D D D D D D
V V V V V V
H P C A O R D V H P C A O R D V H P C A O R D V
Supervision Ring Identity Conflict Identity Ring
Benefit Ring Benefit Ring - Stylized