Design and Analysis of An Articulated Robot Arm
Design and Analysis of An Articulated Robot Arm
shoulder joint is actuated by two quadrupeds is to aim for very fast, rapidly
servomotors in parallel mechanically. The accelerated, able to make tight turns robots
two shoulder joint motors and the elbow with flexible spine, articulated legs, possibly
including head and tail, such as the Boston
joint motor are ”quarter-scale” servomotors,
Dynamics’ Cheetah concept. Lygorouas et
so called because of the intended use in al. [11] developed a computer-controlled
quarter-scale aircraft hobby models. lightweight mechanical arm. This
mechanical arm was a selfcontained,
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW autonomous system capable of executing
high-level commands from a supervisory
Early research efforts in legged locomotion
computer. The actuators of the joints were
focused on statically stable gaits in which
permanent magnet type dc motors driven by
robot’s centre of gravity is always kept over
servoamplifiers via Pulse Width
the polygon formed by the supporting feet
Modulation. Aung [12] designed and
[1]. Raibert, around 1985, set the stage with
implemented a controller circuit based on
his ground-breaking work on dynamic
PIC microcontroller and H bridge circuit to
legged locomotion [2], which resulted in one
control the motion of a Wheeled Mobile
of the most advanced quadrupeds, Boston
Robot (WMR). He used MATLAB software
Dynamics’ BigDog that can control its
for the modeling of the total system. Silva
forward speed, and although it moves with
[13] applied fuzzy logic at several
static stable gaits, it can achieve a
hierarchical levels of a typical robotic
dynamically balanced trot gait when moving
control system. For controlling robotic
at human walking speeds [3]. Boston
manipulators, Moosavian [14] used
Dynamics’ statically stable LittleDog, is a
transpose jacobian (TJ) control. Arciniegas
quadruped walking robot with 12 degrees of
et al. [15] developed neural network based
freedom, used as an algorithm test bed. A
adaptive control system to control the
different design and control approach is
flexible robotic arm. Tseng [16] developed a
followed in Scout II [4] and in the NTUA
DSP based instantaneous torque controller
Quadruped Robot [5, 6], which use only one
to control the manipulator. Rogers [17]
actuator and a spring per leg to realise
designed a microcontroller circuit for
dynamically stable running with speed
interfacing joint sensor to control robotic
control. While the Scout requires a time-
arm. A simple structured linked model of the
consuming trial-and-error controller
articulated limb was developed where the
parameter determination to achieve a given
model is manipulated in simulation to ‘pull’
speed, the NTUA quadruped control
the end of the limb towards the desired
algorithm does not need empirical gain
destination position and orientation [18].
tuning. Quadruped robots like Kotetsu [7]
Hisham [19] developed a PIC 16F877
that employ Central Pattern Generator
microcontroller based system where an
(CPG) based controllers and KOLT [8] that
articulated robot arm having six degrees of
uses a fuzzy controller are different
freedom was controlled [19]. In this present
approaches towards achieving dynamic
work, an ATmega32L microcontroller based
stable gaits. Recent research efforts by the
controller circuit has been designed to
Autonomous System Lab at ETH [9] and the
control the three degrees of freedom of an
Advanced Robotics Department at IIT [10]
articulated robot arm.
are aiming at making a step forward from
LittleDog and BigDog respectively.
Generally, the tendency for the new robotic
ANVESHANA’S INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES
EMAIL ID: [email protected], WEBSITE: www.anveshanaindia.com
38
AIJREAS VOLUME 2, ISSUE 11 (2017, NOV) (ISSN-2455-6300) ONLINE
ANVESHANA’S INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES
4.0 ANALYSIS
for precision. Hence both the models are boundary conditions with 3 different materials
eligible for further studies. (steel, al-356, ARAMID epoxy) and calculated
results of deformation and stress, and shear
Table Circular arm robot stress and strain values for both models.
Parameters STEEL AL-356 ARA The completed project will consist of
MID a robot arm. While analyzing models with
EPOX different materials we got different weights and
Y different stress and different strain values.
Deformation 0.09940 0.12171 1.4472 From all these results we can say, if we
(mm) 2 compare both robots by materials we can say
that steel square arm robot will reduce overall
Stress(Mpa) 117.63 51.715 170.67 stress by 16% compare with circular arm robot
with steel material. But in al-356 material we
Strain 0.00060 0.00072 0.0109 reducing only 2% of stress compare with
079 088 39 circular arm. And in ARAMID epoxy produces
much more stress compare with other 2
Shear 61.987 27.234 86.4 materials. And we know that composite
stress(Mpa) materials generally high strength materials and
also expensive. By comparing both circular and
square arm robots here we observe that square
shape arms have more weight compare to
180 circular arm robots.
160
140 FUTURE SCOPE:
120
The scope of the project includes the designing
100
and building of the hardware and software for a
80
STEEL comparable robot arm. This Robotic arm is
60
very useful for the society and also in industrial
40 AL-356
application and it works successfully at the
20
ARAMID EPOXY time of demonstration. A humanoid robotics is
0
a new challenging field. To co-operate with
human beings, humanoid robots not only have
to feature human like form and structure, but
more importantly, they must prepared human
like behavior regarding the motion,
communication and intelligence.