EN Slides
EN Slides
VISION
ADDED VALUE
Empower the world to Offering more through
achieve performance innovation and value for
excellence money
BEST KNOW-HOW
Through the integration of
multidisciplinary global
expertise
COMMON SENSE
VALUES Fairness, modesty and
MISSION friendship
Provide integrated
performance DATA AND FACTS
Expertise and opinions based
solutions
on specific data
through rigorous
research, educational EFFICIENCY
programs and Key principle for prioritization
advisory services and getting things done
77 70
Details at: marketplace.kpiinstitute.org/publications.html
Matching your needs with an Support in deploying the Support and audit the project`s
appropriate software solution. solution of your choice. progress and ensure that the
end results are fit.
DAY 4 DAY 5
10 Data Visualization
7 KPI Documentation
KPI documentation 5%
Clarity Focus
Communication
70%
59%
60%
50%
41% 41% 41%
40% 35%
29%
30% 24%
20% 18% 18%
12% 12%
10% 6% 6% 6%
0%
60%
53%
50%
40% 35%
29%
30% 24%
20%
12% 12% 12% 12%
10%
0%
40%
29% 29%
30%
0%
Reports
Rewards
Scorecards
Targets
Technology
Training
Individual performance
System Map
plans
Desired State of
Evolution Performance
evaluations
Strategy Map
Performance
conversations
Performance Scorecard
Organisational KPI
Catalogue Personal Level
Portfolio of Initiatives
Personal performance
Dashboard plans
Performance review
meetings Performance reviews
Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fleischwolf-zerlegt.jpg
Photo taken by: Kku, Modified by: Rainer Zenz
ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY
INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OUTCOMES
OUTCOMES
• Overall
organizational Departmental
objectives
Team
Operational level
• Performance management implemented
• Cascading objectives, KPIs and targets
• Constant feedback to higher and lower levels
Individual level
• Performance management implemented
• Understanding the impact of individual work upon the
organizational strategy
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 29
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
Desired State of Strategy Map Risk Log
Evolution
Budget
Current State
Portfolio of Performance
Performance Report
Initiatives Scorecard
Environmental
Scan Initiative Description KPI Description
Mandate
Performance
Dashboard
KPI Description
Safety: the creation and relentless maintenance of a healthy and safe work environment and safe work practices in everything we do.
Integrity: do the right things, do things right, say what you do and do what you say.
Honesty and openness in communication: ethical and honest dealings with all stakeholders and openness in communication on an informed and
need-to-know basis with due regard to privacy and confidentiality.
Customer focus: all applicants and employees are entitled to high quality customer service.
Excellence: develop and maintain high performance and proficiency standards in all services provided to both employees and applicant.
Competence: develop a talented and motivated workforce, mastered through education, mentoring, training and experience. Values
Source: The KPI Institute (2020)
0% 50% 100%
Workforce profile
% Accession rate Target % Succession plans for key positions Target
19% 17%
14% 12% 14% 12% 10% 14%
9% 7% 9% 10% 9% 9% 7% 7%
10%
4% 6% 6% 4%
3% 3% 2%
0% 0%
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
2016 2017 2016 2017
Focus
Purpose To indicate the level of satisfaction and motivation of employees, as high levels of satisfaction lower turnover rates, leading to higher
performance and superior customer service.
Strategic Objective objective 20
Measurement focus Satisfaction Measurement type Quantitative
Impact stage Outcome Indicator focus Leading
Level Strategic Presence at other levels Downstream
Data profile
Data capture period Spot Standard reporting frequency Q
Automation fit Not recommended Data integrity Low
Limitations The accuracy of data can be limited by respondents' subjectivity, as the data is based on survey results.
Targets
Target 0 Green threshold 85-100
Benchmarking fit Unsuitable Yellow threshold 65-85
Other intermediate targets targets 20 Red threshold < 65
Measure administration
Measure owner (title) HR Manager Data custodian (title) HR Analyst
Measure owner (name) John McKinney Data custodian (name) George Douglas
Current status Active Activation date (past or future) N/A
Data gathering
Lead time 14 days
Data source (DB name, System...) Survey report
Who maintains DS HR Department When is data produced End of quarter
Comments
Studies suggest a direct correlation between employee satisfaction and increased performance on customer satisfaction, even on financial results.
Source: The KPI Institute (2020)
Data History
Comments Decisions
Apr Apr
May May
Jun Jun
Jul Jul
Description
Risk profile
Interdependencies
Comments
Learning Decision
Making Performance
Hardware Governance Improvement
Initiative
Management
Data Reporting
Analysis
Data
Gathering
Data KPI
Software Visualization Documentation Processes Performance
Measurement
KPI
Selection
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 39
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK GOVERNANCE
• Assumes ownership;
• Collect data;
Department Department • Report data;
• Implements decisions;
• Takes actions.
Images:
• The KPI Institute (2017), Human Resources Performance Management Toolkit. Available at:
https://marketplace.kpiinstitute.org/hr-performance-management-system-toolkit.html;
• The KPI Institute (2017), KPI Management Concept Map.
Metrics
Measurement
KPIs KRIs
Performance Risk
Assessment Assessment
Analytics
Decision Making
# Air humidity
# Air purity
# Employees
# Highway kilometres
# Employee age
$ Budget
% Budget variance
$ Revenues
$ Operating costs
KPI Definition:
A measurable expression for the achievement of a desired level of results in an area relevant
to the evaluated entity’s activity.
(The KPI Institute)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand
Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 51
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs
KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
SMART OBJECTIVES DECOMPOSED
Option 1: Increase market share to 28% by the end of the financial year
under Marketing Director coordination.
Option 2:
Corporate Goal 2 – To establish a new pricing structure up to September 30, 2009 depending on the phases
established in the work plan.
Corporate Goal 3 – To provide a preliminary report of the Technical Cooperation Project up to September
30, 2009.
Corporate Goal 4 – To implement planned activities for the Third Set of Locks Project up to September 30,
2009, in compliance with the milestones of the established schedule.
Corporate Goal 5 – To make optimal use of the existing plant to meet transit demands, ensuring a service
level compliance average ≥ 85 percent.
Corporate Goal 6 - To adapt the organization through the improvement of the processes identified up to
September 30, 2009.
Corporate Goal 8 – To develop the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan for Sustainable Development and
Integrated Management of Water Resources for the Panama Canal Watershed up to September 30, 2009.
Corporate Goal 9 – To prepare a talent management plan and to provide a generational shift and to meet
emerging needs in the operation up to September 30, 2009.
Corporate Goal 10 – To improve the working environment ≥ 5.0 percent, measured by a satisfaction,
commitment and work climate survey up to September 30, 2009.
Corporate Goal 11 – To ensure that the Corporate Performance Index (CDI) is ≥ 100, up to September 30,
2009.
Objective 3 – Implement best practices in terms of business management and corporate governance.
Objective 4 – Ensure the availability and quality of water resources for consumption and for the
Panama Canal operations.
Objective 5 –Transform the organization and develop its capabilities to benefit of new business
opportunities.
Objective 7 – Strengthen the relationship with clients and foster business intelligence.
$ = Value of
% = Percentage of
# Complaints received
% Customer satisfaction
• Needs identification
• Selection
• Documentation
• Visualization
• Analysis • Analysis
2. Terminology standards:
• Objectives - Verb
• KPIs - Symbols (#, %, $)
• Initiatives - Noun.
3. KPI lifecycle:
• Establishment
• Use
• Evolution.
Images:
• ADRPBF (2015), Metrics, KPIs and KRIs – developed in partnership with The KPI Institute. Available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxd_n49U7uw&t=76s;
• Google (2020), Google Analytics. Available at: http://www.google.com/analytics/;
• Spider Strategies (2020), QuickScore. Available at: http://www.integerperform.com/kpi-dashboard-
balanced-scorecard-software/.
3 KPI Typology
1. Leading vs lagging KPIs
2. Qualitative vs quantitative KPIs
3. Efficiency vs effectiveness KPIs
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 61
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
LEADING VS LAGGING KPIS
Task:
• Cluster the following examples into leading and lagging
KPIs.
No. KPI examples Leading or
lagging?
1 % Employee engagement
2 % Customers from referrals
3 % Customer satisfaction
4 % Market share
5 $ Profit
6 % Returning customers
7 # Service lead time
% Staff with competencies
8
at desired level
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 62
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
QUALITATIVE VS QUANTITATIVE KPIS
Qualitative data - descriptive data, narrative
• Interviews
• Focus groups
• Observation sessions
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 63
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
QUALITATIVE KPIS?
Provide timely high-quality advice Key performance indicator 2010-11 result
Timely high-quality briefing The department provided timely and high-quality briefing which
meeting ministerial expectations and advice meeting ministerial enabled the government to navigate a complex and interconnected
expectations provided in set of policies and issues. In particular, the department provided
• % Advice provided on time relation to the government's extensive and detailed briefing that underpinned the development of
• # Versions for advice reports climate change mitigation the carbon price package―often to extremely tight timeframes.
policies.
• % Satisfaction with advice
National Carbon Offset The NCOS was implemented by 1 July 2010 and 17 Greenhouse
Standard (NCOS) implemented Friendly™ clients were assisted in making the tradition to the NCOS
by 1 July 2010 and Domestic Carbon Neutral Program. A stakeholder workshop to scope an NCOS
NCOS implementation Offsets Integrity Committee review was held and discussion papers were drafted.
established to approve offset
NCAT implementation methodologies. An interim committee was established to consider proposed offset
methodologies, pending the passage of legislation to formally
establish the committee.
National Carbon Accounting The Carbon Farming Initiative Mapping Tool and the Reforestation
Toolbox (NCAT) implemented Modelling Tool were released. Feedback from stakeholders was
Ensure timely and smooth for forestry and agriculture. positive.
processing of applications
Timely and smooth processing The DNA provided, in response to applications received, nine letters
• % Applications processed in of applications to the of approval to Australian companies participating in Clean
Designated National Authority Development Mechanism projects in other countries. Target
SLA (DNA) and a Designated Focal processing times were achieved in almost all cases.
• % Applications processes Point (DFP) to enable
correctly first time Australian industry to establish
offset projects in other
• # Average delay in processing countries.
applications
Source: Australian Federal Government (2011)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 64
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
QUALITATIVE VS QUANTITATIVE KPIS
“Quantitative KPIs are likely to be based on system collected statistics such as
number of users whereas qualitative KPIs may be based on more subjective
measurements from user interviews and surveys.”
Public Record Office Victoria, Australia (2010)
“Quality KPIs are statistical measures that give an indication of output quality.
However, some quality indicators can also give an indication of process quality.”
ESS Quality Glossary, European Union (2010)
All KPIs are quantitative, but they can measure different aspects of an
objective, such as:
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 65
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
IDENTIFY THE KPIS REFLECTING QUALITY
Find in the below list the KPIs that reflect quality as perception.
1. $ Turnover
2. # Production cycle time
3. # Brand image index
4. # Customer satisfaction score
5. % Equipment utilization rate
6. % Error rates
7. % Employee engagement
8. $ Operating costs
9. % Market share
10. # Service quality rating
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 66
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
EFFICIENCY VS EFFECTIVENESS KPIS
Effectiveness
Desired
Inputs Processes Outputs Outcomes
output/outcome
Efficiency
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 67
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
EFFICIENCY VS EFFECTIVENESS KPIS
Being effective Being efficient
Performance measure Target 17
Number of assurance reports presented to the 1 Percentage increase to average cost per audit 0% ✔
1 3 ✔
Parliament
2 Number of performance audit reports presented 48 2 Average elapsed time (months) for performance audits ✔
✔
Percentage of requests from parliamentarians for Percentage of performance audit staff available hours
S private briefings or educational sessions that are 100% 2 80% ✔
✔ charged to audit work
undertaken
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 68
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
EFFICIENCY VS EFFECTIVENESS KPIS
Effectiveness = the extent to which Efficiency = extent to which
a desired outputs or outcomes is time, effort or cost are well used
achieved. for the desired results.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 69
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
ANALYZE WESTERN AUSTRALIA POLICE KPIS
Key Effectiveness Indicators (a) 2015-16 Target (b)
(a)
Key Efficiency Indicators 2015-16 Target (b)
Service 1: Metropolitan policing services
Average cost of metropolitan policing services per person in the Perth metropolitan area $254
Service 2: Regional and remote policing services
Average cost of regional and remote policing services per person in regional WA $725
Service 3: Specialist policing services
Average cost of specialist policing services per person in WA $162
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 70
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
SESSION REVIEW
1. Leading or lagging ? – depends on the context.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 71
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
REFERENCES
• Australian Federal Government (2011), Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency annual
report 2010–11. Available at: http://www.climatechange.gov.au/about-us/annual-reports/annual-
report-2010-11;
• Australian National Audit Office (2017), ANAO 2017-18 Corporate plan, available at:
https://www.anao.gov.au/work/corporate/anao-2017-18-corporate-plan;
• Charted Accountants Professionals Canada (2010), Performance indicators. Available at:
http://www.camagazine.com/archives/print-edition/2010/march/regulars/camagazine34812.aspx;
• Eurostat (2010), ESS quality glossary. Available at:
http://www.eqavet.eu/qa/gns/glossary/q/quality-indicator.aspx;
• Institute for Evidence Based Change (2017), Measuring success: Leading and lagging indicators for
Linked Learning, Linked Learning Convention Oakland 2017. Available at:
http://www.linkedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Measuring-Success-Leading-and-
Lagging-Indicators-for-Linked-Learning.pdf;
• Public Record Office Victoria, Australia (2010), Strategic management guidelines: Key Performance
Indicators. Available at: http://prov.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/1010g3.pdf;
• McGill Qualitative Health Research Group (2017), Qualitative or quantitative research?. Available at:
https://www.mcgill.ca/mqhrg/resources/what-difference-between-qualitative-and-quantitative-
research;
• Western Australia Police (2017), Annual report 2016. Available at:
https://www.police.wa.gov.au/About-Us/Our-agency/Annual-report.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 72
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Typology Targets Gathering Visualization
AGENDA
4 KPI Taxonomy
1. Interdisciplinary systemic worldview
2. KPI use case scenarios
3. KPI DNA Map
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 74
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI USE CASE SCENARIOS
1 Organizational strategy
7 Project management
12 Fitness training
Personal Performance
13 Personal performance management
17 Audit
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 75
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
1. ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY
Context: Scorecards to monitor the achievement of strategy, through KPIs.
Perspective / Goal smartKPIs. Standard Previous Current Trend Target % Target Results Comments
Strategic Objectives / KPIs com # reporting Period Results complete
frequency Results
Customer - 1 Strategic Objectives / 2 KPIs
Maintain high levels of internal customer satisfaction
% Internal customer satisfaction with HR service levels sK2379 Q 85% 75% 90% 83%
# Complaints received sK2038 Q 0 1 k 0 50%
Financial - 2 Strategic Objectives / 3 KPIs
Seek efficiencies to minimize cost base
$ Cost per hire sK49 M 400.00 534.00 k 350.00 153%
$ Cost avoidance savings sK262 M 918.00 560.00 500.00 112%
Maintain financial rigor in budget projection and
execution
% HR budget variance sK479 M -5% -3% k 2% -157%
Internal Processes - 2 Strategic Objectives / 4 KPIs
Optimize recruitment
# Time to fill a vacant position sK688 M 25 19 15 79%
% Employees who leave the organization in the first 3 months sK688 M 15% 12% 10% 83%
Improve HR service delivery capability
% HR projects on time, on budget and according to specifications sk2863 M 62% 87% k 80% 109%
% HR processes optimized sk2284 M 84% 46% 60% 77%
People, Learning & Growth - 2 Strategic Objectives / 4
KPIs
Build an environment that fosters creativity and
innovation
# HR employee engagement index sK1836 Q 56 76 k 65 117%
# Ideas for new / improved service from HR employees sK4657 M 14 19 k 30 63%
Develop workforce skills and competences
# Certifications per HR employee sK4659 Q 2.18 1.35 2.00 68%
# Training hours per HR full time equivalent (FTE) sK7 M 14 8 8 100%
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 76
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
2. ORGANIZATIONAL OPERATIONS STRATEGY
Context: Dashboards to provide a more detailed overview of corporate performance.
0% 50% 100%
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 77
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
3. DEPARTMENTAL STRATEGY
Context: Scorecards to monitor strategy at operational level.
ALL FM Departments
Current Previous Four Months Current Month Score
Current Metric Fiscal
Performance Metric Month
target Status YTD Dec Nov Oct Sep
Score EB HS StPW Central Energy
Safety Meeting Attendance (bi-monthly) 95+% - - 99% - 99% - - - - - -
Lost Time Injuries 0 3 Y - 2 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 0
Preventive Maintenance - FLS 100% 93% R 97.3% 96% 95% 100% 99% 86% 98% 98% 33% 94%
ALL FM
Preventive Maintenance - Non-FLS Critical 90% 64% R 80.5% 77% 77% 85% 95% 68% 84% 61% - 39%
Preventive Maintenance - Non-FLS Non-
Critical 85% 76% Y 86.4% 92% - - - 94% 81% 49% - -
Customer Work Order Response Time 85% 77% Y 78.7% 77% 76% 78% 85% 74% 80% 77% 72% 50%
Customer Initiated Work 85% 47% R 46.4% 49% 42% 43% 55% 49% 51% 49% 28% 36%
FM Initiated Work 85% 55% R 55.3% 55% 56% 57% 58% 58% 49% 55% 40% 72%
Campus Energy Report Card <95% 97% Y - 98% 107% 107% 107% 97% 114% 89%
Energy
Utility Outages 0 2% R - 1 0 5 5 - - - - -
Custodial Projects Completed On-Time 85+% 92% G - 77% 69% 80% 62% - 56% 99%
Districts Custodial Quality Assessment Counts 100% 97% Y - 98% 88% 93% 98% 100% 100% 89%
Custodial Quality
Service Centre Answer Time 90+% 91% G - 92% 95% 90% 93%
Central
Elevator Entrapments N/A 6 N/A - 5 7 8 4
Positive aspects: Detailed information on past months. Traffic lights are used to enable
immediate understanding of performance data.
Recommendations: Link KPIs to more specific strategic objectives, not only to activity areas.
Source: University of Minnesota (2014)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 78
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
4. DEPARTMENTAL OPERATIONS TRACKING
Context: Dashboards to offer visibility into key processes.
Positive aspects: KPIs Executive Dashboard Sales Marketing Products Logistics Operations
tables and graphs with Sum of Net Sales (M) $216.55M # $34.42M
data meaning.
Gross Margin 25.25% # 0.03%
Employee Satisfaction 89 # 4
processes or activities.
Turnover Summary Alerts
Do Action Display : Default View
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 79
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
5. ALLIANCES / JOINT VENTURES RELATIONSHIP
SCORECARD
Context: Scorecards to monitor performance of alliances or other business
partnerships.
Best
Unit Of Target Actual Indicator
Sr. Relationship Objectives Performance Measure In
Measure
2003 2003 Class
A Relationship Value
B Relationship Strength
Improve DC's satisfaction with the deliverables and relationship and address Client satisfaction index (7point scale) (#)/7
B1
operational issues effectively Critical issues pending beyond SLA %
Proactively respond to DC's requirements and needs by developing an DC managers' satisfaction with
B2 (#)/7
understanding of critical business issues responsiveness
No. of services leveraged by client (#)/(##)
B3 Build in key opportunities to leverage Infosys capabilities
No. of IT solutions under discussion #
Positive aspects: KPIs are linked to clear objectives established for the alliance.
Recommendations: Standardize KPI names and allocate a section to comment KPI results.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 80
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
6. PORTFOLIO AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
GSG Portfolio Profile
Project State
Context: KPIs to monitor the
Introduction
performances in terms of managing The purpose of this report is to provide various 17%
snapshots of the GSG Projects Portfolio from Active
more projects. different angels. This enables a better
7%
Postponed
understanding of the projects mix and highlight Proposed
potential bottlenecks. 4 Cancelled
8%
67% Closed
Positive aspects: KPI results are Portfolio Update
> At 10 Oct 2007 the GSG project portfolio
displayed through graphs, in the comprised 60 projects.
1%
> 100% of these projects are tracked using EPM.
format of a dashboard. Project State - identifies the current lifecycle
of projects
Notes:
Half of all active projects are managed by the Active = Projects being actively managed
Strategy and Planning Tower. Portponed = On hold pending availability of
Recommendations: Replace pie charts, There is an almost equal split between projects budget, resources of policy decision, etc
subject to PMO governance and other GSG projects Proposed = An initiative under discussion but
with more effective data visualization using a lighter governance model. not approved as a project
Cancelled = Formally discontinued by a PCB
tools; Organization Closed = Delivered project
SP 20 Project Clusters
Comments: Dashboards are very useful PT
SD 2
18 20
17
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 81
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
7. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 82
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
8. QUALITY / PROCESS MANAGEMENT
Context: KPIs to measure quality and compliance with standards, as well as to
support process optimization.
Steps 1 2 3 4
Recommendations: Are
corrective Compare actual Analyze/report Identify
Collect
Establish KPIs to assess
Make changes to bring
actions performance to actual responsible
back in line with goal data
necessary? goals performance parties
10 9 8 7 6 5
Source: Adapted from Oak Ride Institute for Science and Education (2005)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 83
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
8. QUALITY / PROCESS MANAGEMENT
Process improvement
✓Capacity
✓Space ✓Productivity
✓Waste! ✓Profit
✓Quality
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 84
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
9. SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (SLA)
Context: KPIs to ensure the quality of services delivered – whether is about third
party providers (suppliers) or internal providers (departments, divisions).
Incident Response
available.
Comments: Medium
caused by a failure of a non-critical
process or a function. No significant
Response time within 2 hours and TR will
communicate a plan to bring this function <=24 hrs
effect on the business is expected and back to operation
80%
providers. Service
5 business
1 business day days-7 80%
request
calendar days
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 85
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
10. SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Context: KPIs to monitor performance of supplier, for a streamlined supply chain.
a) 3 Perspectives b) 8 Categories c) 24 Indicators
Compliance with client requirements
Outcomes Quality and severity of defects
The objectives of the engagement were achieved
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 86
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
11. EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Context: KPIs and scorecards to evaluate performance of each employee in the
organization.
Strategic perspectives with assigned objectives and Standard Current
KPIs for individual level reporting Previous Target Status Comments
results
frequency results
1. Customer
Maintain high levels of customer satisfaction
% Customer requests solved in standard time M 85% 80% 98%
2. Internal processes
Deliver services in a timely manner
% Confirmation letters sent in standard time M 95% 95% 98%
% Reports submitted on time M 97% 93% 98%
Provide quality services
# Reports with factual errors M 2 0 0
% Accuracy of quotations issued Just began to learn how to
M 80% 55% 100% calculate quotations
3. People, learning and growth
Build a performance oriented culture
% Employee performance data up to date M 100% 100% 100%
Add value through knowledge sharing and innovation
# Improvement ideas submitted Q 3 3 2
Overall individual performance evaluation
Self assessment comments
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 87
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
12. FITNESS TRAINING
Context: KPIs to track performance of athletes.
Positive aspects:
The dashboard allows target
setting for KPIs and enables
you to visualize progress in
time.
Comments:
A clear perspective on current
fitness performance
contributes to better planning
workouts.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 88
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
13. PERSONAL MANAGEMENT
Context: KPIs to monitor personal achievements, to track daily activities, to
improve time management.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 89
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
14. SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE REPORTING
Context: KPIs to assess the environmental impact Commute Alternatives
Program Results
of activities. Results are presented in sustainability
Commute Program
scorecards or in dedicated performance reports.
61%
increase in
participation
Positive aspects: there is a trend in representing
performance data in annual reports through infographics. CO2 Emission savings
Renewable energy
2007 iPhone
Comments:
Transparency in KPI results can positively contribute to
brand image.
2011 iPhone
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI
KP Taxonomy Working with Data Data Course 90
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
15. BENEFITS REALIZATION MANAGEMENT
Context: Benefits realization is an important part of project management and
should rely on KPIs that clearly outline expected benefits.
A. Estimated transactions in a full year (SOURCE Deliverable A) 1,300,000
management through KPIs C. Number of contracts between $50K and $100K p.a.
Calculation (BxC)
800 p.a.
$1,600,000
provides the necessary visibility Estimated Total Saving Per Annum from New Tendering Threshold $1,600,000
in assessing investment projects. Part Year effect (since August 2004) $1,450,000
D. Estimated savings in moving from written to verbal quotes $1,000 per contract
E. Number of contracts 1,500 p.a.
Calculation (DxE) $1,500,000
Estimated Total Saving Per Annum from New Quoting Threshold $1,500,000
Part Year effect (since August 2004) $1,375,000
Source: Western Australia Department of Treasury and Finance (2005)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 91
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
16. GENERAL OPERATIONAL REPORTING
Context: KPIs are commonly used by departments or teams to report the
performance of their activities.
Positive aspects: KPI results are accompanied by comments to facilitate
understanding of current performance level.
Table 1
Recommendations:
IT Help-Desk Services, Sample of Summary Metrics
Structure the KPIs
under sustainability MIT Stanford
FY02 FY03 Change FY02 FY03 Change Comments
objectives and outline Cases per Help-Desk 1,595 1776 11% 1,614 1,786 11%
Case volume increased; staffing
specific targets that are Full-Time-Equivalent
(FTE) Employee
remained relatively constant
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 92
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
17. AUDIT
Context: KPIs can be used to assess the quality of the audit department, but also
to analyze how an organization is coordinated.
Qualitative Quantitative
• The checklist from the Entity /
Program
Example of a Typical Deliverable Indicator Indicator
Target
provided?
provided? provided?
example is used to Customs Regulate and facilitate international
evaluates the KPIs used Program 1.1 passengers through assessment of passengers
and crew on arrival including, through
by a set of deployment of detector dogs and real-time ü û û
officer assessment and response activities.
organizations to track if
their projects deliver Program 1.4 Northern Waters surveillance ACV Triton
(patrol days).
û ü û
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 93
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
18. COMPLIANCE REPORTING
Metric Number Performance Metric High Low Mean
STAGE 2 1 Compliance with Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) Contracts 100.0% 55.0% 88.8%
Emerging
should be standardized.
Chain
Operations 3 Average Lines per Purchase Order 5.0 2.4 3.4
4 Number of Purchase Orders Placed per Supplier per Week 30.0 1.4 6.1
4
Proportion of Invoices Received Electronically
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.6%
are published.
3 Proportion of Items Added to the Master File (Collected as # of 622 1 185
Items in One Month)
4 Proportion of Items Added to the Master File (Collected as # of 3327 0 508
Items in One Month)
Suppliers
Stage 1 Core 1 Proportion of Invoiced Paid within Due Date 100.0% 0.0% 58.5%
Supply Chain
Operations 2 Supplier Performance (Proportion of On-Time and Complete 98.4% 87.3% 93.5%
Deliveries for Top 10 Suppliers)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 94
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI DNA MAP
Scenario:
• You are part of the management team in your organization.
Based on the context provided, you have to recreate the KPI
taxonomy of two divisions in the organization.
Task:
• Read carefully the reports provided and identify examples
of KPIs that you can use to populate the taxonomy given.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 95
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI DNA MAP
Production – Performance report for the 4th Q of 2017
• Production costs seem to have increased by 10% during the last quarter,
negatively influencing the cost per item, as well. A possible cause for these
financial results is the low production capacity utilization rate and a low
productivity in terms of units per man-hour and items produced per hour.
• All these events negatively impacted the results for budget variance, although
the production output stayed the same.
• A positive trend was noticed in terms of production quality as the defect rate was
reduced to 2% and less waste was generated.
Quality Quantity
Scrap Meeting standards Volume Productivity
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 97
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI DNA MAP
CUSTOMER SERVICE – Performance report for the 4th Q of 2017
• The latest performance results point out that customer satisfaction with customer service has
increased to 89%, while no complaints with customer service were registered during the last
quarter.
• Given the processes mapping initiative in the department, the time to solve customer tickets
was reduced as well as the after call working time.
• The volume of customer tickets solved increased and also the accuracy in processing of
tickets, reflected in the number of errors in processing tickets per agent as the new
technology installed enable agents to better manage their tasks.
• Another improvement was noticed in terms of productivity, as the volume of calls received,
increased as well as the customer calls answered per agent.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 98
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI DNA MAP
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Costs Timeliness
Expenses Planning Duration Schedule adherence
Quality Quantity
Meeting standards Satisfaction Volume Productivity
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 99
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI DNA MAP
The KPI taxonomy can be consolidated into a matrix, integrating
also the concepts of efficiency and effectiveness.
Efficiency Effectiveness
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 100
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
SESSION REVIEW
1. 18 different scenarios / contexts to use KPIs.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 101
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
REFERENCES
• Apple (2011), Environmental responsibility. Available at: http://www.apple.com/environment/;
• Australian National Audit Office (2011), Development and implementation of Key Performance Indicators to
support the outcomes and programs framework. Available at:;
http://www.anao.gov.au/~/media/Uploads/Audit%20Reports/2011%2012/201112%20Audit%20Report%20No%205
.pdf
• Body Media Fit (2015), Activity Manager. Available at: http://www.bodymedia.com/?whence=;
• Clebsch, B., Dougherty, J. D., and Anderson, G. (2004), Management by fact: Benchmarking university IT
services. Available at: http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/management-fact-benchmarking-university-it-
services;
• Felton, N. (2013), Annual report. Available at http://feltron.com/FAR13_11.html;
• Godrejinfotech.com (2010), Products. Available at:
http://www.godrejinfotech.com/godrej/godrejinfotech/offerings/products/sap/pro_sap_busiObj.html;
• Oak Ride Institute for Science and Education (2005), Performance measurement process. Available at:
http://www.orau.gov/pbm/handbook/1-1.pdf;
• Texas State University (n.d.), Global service level objectives. Available at: http://www.tr.txstate.edu/ser-
cat/sc-object.html;
• The KPI Institute (2017), Retail Performance Management Toolkit. Available at:
https://marketplace.kpiinstitute.org/retail-performance-management-system-toolkit.html;
• The KPI Institute (2017), Individual Performance Management Toolkit. Available at:
https://marketplace.kpiinstitute.org/individual-performance-management-toolkit.html;
• smartKPIs.com (2020), Project management KPIs. Available at: https://smartkpis.kpiinstitute.org/;
• University of Minnesota (2014), Facilities management monthly operations scorecard. Available at:
http://www.facm.umn.edu/prod/groups/uservices/@pub/@uservices/@fm/documents/content/uservices_cont
ent_471610.pdf;
• Western Australia Department of Treasury and Finance (2005), 2004-05 Procurement Reform benefits realisation
report.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 102
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Taxonomy Targets Gathering Visualization
AGENDA
5 KPI Selection
1. KPI selection for organizational scorecard
2. KPI selection sources
3. KPI selection techniques
KPI documentation
Follow up on KPI selection First performance review
33 meeting
Objectives Scorecard
3
Processes Dashboard
WHY
Channels the selection process on a clear path with
specified scope and outputs expected.
Workshop
1
• Competitor review reports
• Strategic development plan
• Printed catalogues
(3-5 years)
SECONDARY
2 • Online catalogues
• Annual business / strategic
(http://www.smartkpis.com/)
plan
3 • Annual reports of other
• Annual reports
organizations (KPIs in
• Internal operational reports
Practice)
• Suppliers input
• Front-line employees input
PRIMARY
• Customers input
• Managers input
• Expert advice
• Board input
• Questions in discussion forums
INTERNAL EXTERNAL
WHY
3
HOW
• Consolidating lists from external sources, like smartKPIs.com.
• Using internal sources to identify KPIs, like operational reports.
WHY
• Enables alignment and identification of possible gaps.
Task:
• Write down 5 KPIs you would recommend.
• Use one single post-it note for each KPI (5 post-it notes
per team).
2
Examples:
• What numbers will demonstrate the objectives
3 achievement?
• What matters?
• So what?
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI
KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 113
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Selection Targets Gathering Visualization
RELEVANT QUESTIONS FRAMING
During the KPI selection Questions to prepare in
FAQs
workshop case they are asked
1
What will we do with KPI
What are the most relevant How many KPIs should we
results?
sources for KPI selection? select?
2
What is the order of
What efforts are required for
importance in which the KPI What is the procedure for
data gathering for each KPI?
3 selection sources should be validating the KPIs selected?
analyzed?
What process are we going
4 Who should participate in What will we learn from the
through and how long will it
the KPI selection process? data?
take?
What figures will reflect the
What is the ideal format for How do we link KPI results
achievement of company
KPI selection process? with bonuses?
objectives?
What sort of data we need to
What are the most relevant
keep track of to ensure
criteria for the KPI selection?
informed decision making?
What are we trying to What matters?
achieve by setting up KPIs?
3 WHY?
• Gain insight into how the objective can be measured
from different perspectives.
• Examples:
➢ Human Resources: # Employees, # Consultants, # Project team
➢ Financial Resources: $ Budget, # Grants, $ Bank loans
➢ Infrastructure: # Production lines available, # Plants available
Source: Adapted from Performance monitoring indicators handbook - World Bank Technical Paper, No 334
• Examples:
➢ Time: % On time delivery vaccination, # Time to finalize task
➢ Utilization: % Equipment utilization rate, % Transportation
capacity used
Source: Adapted from Performance monitoring indicators handbook - World Bank Technical Paper, No 334
• Examples:
➢ # Patients vaccinated
➢ # Items produced
➢ # Scrap generated
➢ # Facilities built
Source: Adapted from Performance monitoring indicators handbook - World Bank Technical Paper, No 334
• Examples:
➢ Impact: % Incidence of disease, % Mortality rate, % Graduates
employment rate
➢ Added value: $ Savings generated by innovation ideas,
# Customer satisfaction index, % Net promoter score
Source: Adapted from Performance monitoring indicators handbook - World Bank Technical Paper, No 334
2 Tasks:
• Write at least 2 input, 2 process, 2 output and 2 outcome
3
metrics.
• Select from these metrics 2-3 KPIs to measure the achievement
of the objective.
• Propose 1-2 initiatives to address the implementation of the
objectives.
WHY?
3
• To avoid focusing on certain KPIs at the expense of
others.
• To provide a wider perspective upon actual
performance.
1 # Incidents of non-
# Fatal accidents Oil & Gas
compliance
% Employees with competencies at
2 # Training hours per FTE Consulting
desired level
4 4
Retained $1,000
Costumers Benefits
generated
6 Contracts signed
10 Proposals 2 Ideas generating
25 Meetings arranged value
60 Prospects 6 Implemented ideas
100 Contacted leads 18 Evaluated ideas
100 Qualified leads
150 Leads 20 Proposed ideas
3
First performance review meeting:
• Review and reconsider some KPIs that may prove
inefficient to measure and report in practice.
• Incentivized
• Practical Clearly
• Reliable defined
• Specific
• Tested
Balanced
• Time bound
• Useful for management
6 KPI in Context
1. KPI alignment approaches
2. Select KPIs for corporate scorecard
3. Cascaded KPIs to functional area
Targets
What KPIs
Targets
Performance
Plan Tasks
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 135
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI ALIGNMENT
Approaches WHEN
• activities are homogeneous and allow
aggregation of strategy and KPIs (for
Organization example retail, banking);
WHEN
• strategy is more clear at business unit
Organization level (for example diversified
companies, holding corporations);
Bottom-up
Organization
• In practice, many companies
find themselves between the
Business
Unit 1
Business
Unit 2
Business
Unit 3
two extreme approaches and
recur to a combination of
tactics.
Top-down
Department 1.1 Department 1.2 Department 3.1
Department 3.2
• The process can start from business units and have an alignment:
➢ bottom-up for corporate scorecard;
➢ top-down for departments within that business unit.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 137
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
CASCADING
1. Business unit objectives can be cascaded at departmental level as
they are, with the same or different KPIs:
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 138
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
EXAMPLE: KPI ALIGNMENT SCENARIOS
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 139
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
EXAMPLE: KPI ALIGNMENT SCENARIOS
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 140
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
SELECT KPIS FOR CORPORATE SCORECARD
• Scenario:
As the new management team of the organization you have
reviewed the strategy and reflected it in the corporate balanced
scorecard. Given the significant changes adopted in terms of
objectives, a new KPI selection process is necessary.
• Task:
Based on the list of KPIs specific for the industry in which you
operate, you must choose the most relevant KPIs for the strategic
objectives already agreed upon.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 141
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
SELECT KPIS FOR CORPORATE SCORECARD
Corporate Scorecard
Financial
Achieve profit growth
Customer
Maintain high levels of customer satisfaction
Internal processes
Maximize capacity utilization
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 142
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
SELECT KPIS FOR CORPORATE SCORECARD
Examples of KPIs
% Bookings conversion rate from # Innovation ideas received from
1 11
website employees
2 % Canceled reservations 12 # Length of stay in hotel
3 # Customer satisfaction index 13 $ Net cash flow
4 # Energy consumption 14 # New guest
5 % Employees certified in hospitality 15 $ Operating costs per room
6 # Employee engagement index 16 $ Revenue per guest
7 $ Gross profit 17 $ Revenue per available square meter
8 # Guests per employee 18 # Rooms available
9 % Hotel occupancy 19 # Room order serving mistakes
10 # Hotel waste generated # Training hours per full time
20
equivalent
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 143
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
CASCADE KPIS TO FUNCTIONAL AREA
Scenario:
• You are part of the organization’s Human Resources team. Given the
strategy review that took place at corporate level, you will have to align
the departmental strategy to the new changes.
Task 1:
• Cascade the objectives and KPIs from the corporate balanced
scorecard to department level.
Task 2:
• Add new relevant objectives and KPIs for the department, based on the
lists with examples provided.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 144
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
CASCADE KPIS TO FUNCTIONAL AREA
Customer
Internal Processes
Financial
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 145
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
CASCADE KPIS TO FUNCTIONAL AREA
Examples of objectives
No. List
O1 Ensure high service delivery standards
O2 Ensure timely order deliveries
O3 Expand customer base
O4 Improve HR service delivery capability
O5 Increase revenues
O6 Maintain high levels of internal customer satisfaction
O7 Optimize recruitment
O8 Optimize call response time
O9 Provide good value for money to the organization
O10 Seek efficiencies to minimize departmental costs
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 146
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
CASCADE KPIS TO FUNCTIONAL AREA
Examples of KPIs
1 # Certifications per HR employee % HR projects on time, on budget
11
2 # Complaints with HR services and according to specifications
3 $ Cost avoidance savings 12 % HR operating expense rate
4 $ Cost per hire # Innovation ideas received from HR
13
# Employee complaints resolution employees
5
timeliness % On-time delivery of HR service
14
6 # Employee engagement index requests
7 % Employee retention rate 15 # Open requisitions
8 # FTEs per HR department FTE 16 # Time to fill a vacant position
% HR customer satisfaction with # Training hours per HR full time
9 17
service levels equivalent (FTE)
10 % HR processes optimized 18 % Turnover
19 % Succession plans in place
20 % Voluntary separation rate
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 147
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Alignment Targets Gathering Visualization
AGENDA
Activation prerequisite
Automation enabler
Knowledge management
WHAT smartKPIs.com #
Definition and usage
Definition
sk5912 Organizational measure no. HRKPI044
Measures the employees' satisfaction and motivation level with aspects regarding the job and working
Focus
Purpose To indicate the level of satisfaction and motivation of employees, as high levels of satisfaction lower
turnover rates, leading to higher performance and superior customer service.
Simplify communication
Impact stage Outcome Indicator focus Leading
• Level
Data profile
Strategic Presence at other levels Downstream
Alignment
Data capture period Spot Standard reporting frequency Q
• Automation fit
Limitations
Not recommended Data integrity Low
The accuracy of data can be limited by respondents' subjectivity, as the data is based on survey results.
14 days
Activation date (past or future) N/A
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 151
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI DOCUMENTATION FORM DESIGN
Form sections Fields
Identification Name, number, functional area
Definition and usage Definition, BSC perspectives
Calculation Sub-metrics, formula, trend
Orientation Meaning, impact, implementation level,
metric type
Purpose Purpose, link to strategic objective
Data profile Automation, frequency, time-lag, integrity,
limitations
Targets Intervals, benchmarking fit
Administration Owner, custodian, source
Focus
Purpose To indicate the level of satisfaction and motivation of employees, as high levels of satisfaction lower turnover rates, leading to higher
performance and superior customer service.
Strategic Objective objective 20
Measurement focus Satisfaction Measurement type Quantitative
Impact stage Outcome Indicator focus Leading
Level Strategic Presence at other levels Downstream
Data profile
Data capture period Spot Standard reporting frequency Q
Automation fit Not recommended Data integrity Low
Limitations The accuracy of data can be limited by respondents' subjectivity, as the data is based on survey results.
Targets
Target 0 Green threshold 85-100
Benchmarking fit Unsuitable Yellow threshold 65-85
Other intermediate targets targets 20 Red threshold < 65
Measure administration
Measure owner (title) HR Manager Data custodian (title) HR Analyst
Measure owner (name) John McKinney Data custodian (name) George Douglas
Current status Active Activation date (past or future) N/A
Data gathering
Lead time 14 days
Data source (DB name, System...) Survey report
Who maintains DS HR Department When is data produced End of quarter
Comments
Studies suggest a direct correlation between employee satisfaction and increased performance on customer satisfaction, even on financial results.
Source: The KPI Institute (2017)
Metric 5.1:
present in the right image are: Target: ≥ 98% by net invoice date
# of Invoiced Paid
contract terms, organizations will be able to negotiate 100%
1200
more favourable future contracts with suppliers. 1000 98%
• Relevancy;
800 96%
Process Efficiency: By changing accounts payable policies 600
and implementing electronic commerce processes with 94%
400
Jan
Mar
May
Oct
Nov
Jun
Jul
Apr
Aug
Dec
Feb
Sep
payable workload.
with other metrics); Supplier Relationships: Paying invoices according to # of Invoices Paid
• Implementation (calculation parameters, formula, %Ta rget: ≥ 98% pa id within due date
• Implementation challenges.
Source: Ontario Buys (2009)
Focus
Purpose To indicate the level of satisfaction and motivation of employees, as high levels of satisfaction lower turnover rates, leading to higher
performance and superior customer service.
Strategic Objective objective 20
Measurement focus Satisfaction Measurement type Quantitative
Impact stage Outcome Indicator focus Leading
Level Strategic Presence at other levels Downstream
Data profile
Data capture period Spot Standard reporting frequency Q
Automation fit Not recommended Data integrity Low
Limitations The accuracy of data can be limited by respondents' subjectivity, as the data is based on survey results.
Targets
Target 0 Green threshold 85-100
Benchmarking fit Unsuitable Yellow threshold 65-85
Other intermediate targets targets 20 Red threshold < 65
Measure administration
Measure owner (title) HR Manager Data custodian (title) HR Analyst
Measure owner (name) John McKinney Data custodian (name) George Douglas
Current status Active Activation date (past or future) N/A
Data gathering
Lead time 14 days
Data source (DB name, System...) Survey report
Who maintains DS HR Department When is data produced End of quarter
Comments
Studies suggest a direct correlation between employee satisfaction and increased performance on customer satisfaction, even on financial results.
Images:
• HSE (2012), KPI guidelines. Available at:
http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/Publications/corporate/performancereports/kpiguidelines2012.pdf;
• Khaled, A., Sanjoy, K. P., Ripon, K. and Salahuddin A. (2011), Selection of suppliers through different
multi-criteria decision making techniques. Available at:
journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/download/479/426;
• The KPI Institute (2017), Human Resources Performance Management Toolkit. Available at:
https://marketplace.kpiinstitute.org/hr-performance-management-system-toolkit.html;
• Ontario Buys (2009), Performance measurement. Phase II - User guide. Available at:
http://www.doingbusiness.mgs.gov.on.ca/mbs/psb/psb.nsf/Attachments/BPSPerformMeasurePhaseII-
UserGuide-pdf-eng/$FILE/perf_meas_userguide-eng.pdf;
• smartKPIs.com (2020), Net promoter score. Available at: https://smartkpis.kpiinstitute.org/kpi-
examples/organisational-context/1303/net-promoter-score
• Impact behavior
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 163
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
TARGET SETTING PROCESS
Yes
Adjust Refresh with Continue
Start Review upon Changes
vertically and managerial monitoring
top-down KPI activation need to be
horizontally approval targets
made?
No
Consultations in target
setting should start with
the top management. As KPIs are active and data
is gathered, targets may be
reviewed and recalibrated Targets need to be
adjusted periodically as
the internal and external
environment of the
company is in a
permanent change.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 164
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
TARGET SETTING SOURCES
Contextual External analysis
Analysis (market trends)
External
Benchmarking
Internal
Benchmarking
Historical
records
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 165
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
TARGET SETTING APPROACHES
Top-down
Increase global
sales
10%
2% 1% 1% 3% 3%
New KSA
Sydney Canberra London Paris Chicago Detroit Qatar UAE
York
1% 1% 1% 1% 1.5% 1% 0.5% 1% 1% 1%
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 166
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
TARGET SETTING APPROACHES
Bottom-up
# Turn time
15 min
• Some activities can take place in the same time like cabin grooming and cargo
loading or unloading, allowing the process to be more efficient
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 167
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
TARGET SETTING APPROACHES
Establishing thresholds
Set target
value
• Increasing
Determine • Decreasing
trend • Within range
• Above target
Establish • In tolerance range
thresholds • Below target
Define each
threshold
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 168
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
KPIS TREND 1.2
0.8
Increasing 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
40
30
Within range 20
10
0
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
0.6
0.5
0.4
Decreasing 0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 169
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
KPI THRESHOLDS
Popular methodologies to express thresholds
Traffic light:
• 2 points scale • 4 points scale
➢ Meets or exceeds target ➢ Above target
➢ Below target
➢ Meets target
➢ Acceptable range
• 3 points scale
➢ Far below target
➢ Meets or exceeds target
➢ Acceptable range
➢ Far below target
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working
Workingwith
with Data Data Course 170
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
CHALLENGES IN WORKING WITH TARGETS
Technical Social
• Historical data does not • Targets are perceived
exist; either too high or too low;
=
Score
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 172
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
WEIGHTS
PROs CONs
• Keep focus on what really • Establishing weights can be
matters by correlating subjective;
importance with weight
value; • Aggregating KPI results into
a performance score/index
• Enable an overall score of brings no value for the
performance; decision making process;
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 174
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
SESSION REVIEW
1. Checklist for working with targets:
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 175
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
REFERENCES
• Philips Hotel (2011), Net promoter score at Philips. Available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lckcJeae5Ds;
• Bain & Company, Satmetrix Systems (2013), Measuring your Net Promoter Score. Available at:
http://www.netpromotersystem.com/about/measuring-your-net-promoter-score.aspx.
Images:
• Arcan, A. (2011), Performance measurements and metrics: An analysis of supplier evaluation. Available
at: http://scm.ncsu.edu/scm-articles/article/performance-measurements-and-metrics-an-analysis-of-
supplier-evaluation;
• Effectory International (2014), Global Employee Engagement Index. Avaliable at:
http://www.employee-engagement-index.com/;
• Eneco (2013), Performance report 2012. Available at:
http://annualreport2012.eneco.com/progress/strategic-kpis;
• Harvard Kennedy School, Center for Public Leadership (2012), A national study on confidence in
leadership. Available at: http://www.centerforpublicleadership.org/images/pdf/NLI/cpl_nli_2012.pdf;
• Lehigh University (2013), GPS weighting factors handout 2013. Available at:
https://hr.lehigh.edu/sites/hr.lehigh.edu/files/GPS_WeightingFactors_2013.pdf;
• Lindsey, M. (n.d.), Supplier performance ratings - Scorecards, rankings, and awarding business.
Available at: http://www.asq-qm.org/resourcesmodule/download_resource/id/348/;
• The KPI Institute (2015), Material extracted from consultancy projects.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Workingwith
Working with Data Data Course 176
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets
Targets Gathering Visualization
AGENDA
# Time to fill a vacant position 35 HR Allan Smith Finance Manager 20-05-17 01-06-17
% Deals closed 234 Sales Julien Harrison Sales Manager 18-06-17 01-06-17
# Production plants functional 4 Production Dan McKenny Production Manager 25-05-17 01-06-17
$ Time to produce 1 item 30 Production Dan McKenny Production Manager 21-05-17 01-06-17
% Brand awareness 50% Marketing Joe Linch Marketing Manager 17-05-17 01-06-17
% Production uptime 10% Production Dan McKenny Production Manager 17-05-17 01-06-17
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 178
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS
CONFORMITY
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 179
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS - COMPLETENESS
Source: Ravn, T. and Hoedholt, M. (2009), How to measure and monitor the quality of master data
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 180
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS - UNIQUENESS
• Make sure there are no duplicate records for the same data;
Source: Ravn, T. and Hoedholt, M. (2009), How to measure and monitor the quality of master data
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 181
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS - CONFORMITY
• Number of - #
• Percentage - %
• Value of - $
Source: Ravn, T. and Hoedholt, M. (2009), How to measure and monitor the quality of master data
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 182
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS – CONSISTENCY
Source: Ravn, T. and Hoedholt, M. (2009), How to measure and monitor the quality of master data
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 183
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS - ACCURACY
Source: Ravn, T. and Hoedholt, M. (2009), How to measure and monitor the quality of master data
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 184
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS - TIMELINESS
Indicates whether the data was submitted in due time, as per the
data gathering and reporting deadline
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course 185
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS
Most common challenges:
Completeness
Availability
Timeliness Accuracy
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 186
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
THE KPI ACTIVATION / DATA GATHERING PROCESS
1
• Meet with data custodians
2
• Secure activation budget KPI
activation
3
• Design the data gathering template
4
• Communicate the template to data custodians
5
• Send KPI data gathering notification On-going
data
• Send reminder email
6 gathering
7
• Receive data process
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 187
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
DATA GATHERING GOVERNANCE
Report Generator
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 188
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
DISCOVER DATA CUSTODIAN ROLES
Analyze KPI measurement options
Reach the targets for the KPIs
Document KPIs
Select KPIs
Activate KPIs
Take decisions based on KPI results
Cascade KPIs to lower organizational levels
Find solutions for inactive KPIs
Ensure quality of data gathered: compliance with measurement
methodology, accuracy and timeliness of submission
Update KPI documentation forms
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 189
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI DATA GATHERING SOURCES
Internal
Operations
Production reports
HSSE observation sheets
ERP Benchmarking
reports
SAP
External
Oracle
benchmarking reports
External entities
Surveys Sources (accreditations,
ratings)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 190
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI ACTIVATION TOOLS
Data gathering process map
1
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 191
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI ACTIVATION TOOLS
Data gathering process map
1
1
Send data gathering Data custodians provide Communicate the
data Generate report
email report to all employees
3rd working day of the 4th working day of the
2nd working day of the 5th working day of the
month month
month month
2
Yes
3
No Remind employees
Actions
about the report and
taken?
the meeting
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 192
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI ACTIVATION TOOLS
Data gathering template
1 KPI # Employment % Job offer # Applicant
brand strength acceptance ratio
rate
smartKPIs.com # sK2 sK53 sK1805
Limit
Floor Threshold Target Ceiling Floor Threshold Target Ceiling Floor Threshold Target Ceiling
Measure owner (name) Firstname Firstname Firstname
Lastname Lastname Lastname
3 Data custodian (name) Firstname Firstname Firstname
Lastname Lastname Lastname
n/a n/a n/a
82 60 100 85% 50% 80% 100% 5
Jan 2009 80 7 8 10
5
Feb 9 8 10
5
Mar 7 8 10
88 60 100 84% 50% 80% 100% 5
Apr 80 6 8 10
5
May 6 8 10
5
Jun 4 8 10
60 60 100 98% 50% 80% 100% 5
Jul 80 1 8 10
5
Aug 3 8 10
5
Sep 2 8 10
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 193
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI ACTIVATION TOOLS
KPI Documentation form
Unique identification
1 KPI name # Employee satisfaction index
smartKPIs.com # sk5912 Organizational measure no. HRKPI044
Definition and usage
Definition Measures the employees' satisfaction and motivation level with aspects regarding the job and working environment:
job responsibilities, team and management, workplace and professional development.
Organizational area HR Balanced Scorecard perspective People / Learning & Growth
Calculation
Subordinate measures used for A = Index calculated based on responses to structured questioning to assess employee satisfaction and dissatisfaction
2 calculation reasons and whether they find their work motivating.
Calculation formula A, based on survey Trend is good when (figures are) Increasing
Focus
Purpose To indicate the level of satisfaction and motivation of employees, as high levels of satisfaction lower turnover rates,
leading to higher performance and superior customer service.
Strategic Objective objective 20
Measurement focus Satisfaction Measurement type Quantitative
3 Impact stage
Level
Outcome
Strategic
Indicator focus
Presence at other levels
Leading
Downstream
Data profile
Data capture period Spot Standard reporting frequency Q
Automation fit Not recommended Data integrity Low
Limitations The accuracy of data can be limited by respondents' subjectivity, as the data is based on survey results.
Targets
Target 0 Green threshold 85-100
Benchmarking fit Unsuitable Yellow threshold 65-85
Other intermediate targets targets 20 Red threshold < 65
Measure administration
Measure owner (title) HR Manager Data custodian (title) HR Analyst
Measure owner (name) John McKinney Data custodian (name) George Douglas
Current status Active Activation date (past or future) N/A
Data gathering
Lead time 14 days
Data source (DB name, Survey report
System...)
Who maintains DS HR Department When is data produced End of quarter
Comments
Studies suggest a direct correlation between employee satisfaction and increased performance on customer satisfaction, even on financial results.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 194
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI ACTIVATION / GATHERING TECHNIQUES
Meeting KPI data custodians in
1 person
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 195
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI ACTIVATION TECHNIQUES
Meeting KPI data custodians in person
1
Maritz Institute - 3 main benefits for conducting face
to face meetings:
2
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 196
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI ACTIVATION TECHNIQUES
Involving data custodians in a community of
1 practice
• Provides a common platform for data custodians to
2 communicate and share work related experience;
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 197
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
KPI ACTIVATION TECHNIQUES
Sending reminder email
1
# KPIs to # KPIs already
Custodian name KPIs not reported on yet Due date Status Comment
report reported on
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 198
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
WORKING WITH DATA CUSTODIANS
Scenario:
• As a part of the KPI implementation project team, following the
strategic planning session, your have to deal with a list of currently
inactive KPIs for the organization.
Task:
• You are required to meet with all data custodians and discuss the
inactive KPIs. To guide your discussion use the agenda provided and
make sure each topic is debated and solutions are found.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 199
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
WORKING WITH DATA CUSTODIANS
Agenda
No. Topics No. KPIs to discuss
1 Present the scope of the meeting # Complaints registered from
1
Explain each KPI (definition, customers
2 calculation formula, data collection 2 % Project on time
frequency) 3 # Employee engagement index
Identify resources needed to activate
3
each KPI (infrastructure, people, costs)
Propose solutions to gather data for
4
each KPI
5 Establish activation dates for each KPI
6 Next steps and closing the meeting
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 200
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
DATA COLLECTION METHODS
• Automated:
➢ Off-the shelf software;
➢ Custom-designed software.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 201
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
DATA COLLECTION METHODS
• During the last years, companies have oriented their IT investments
towards BI tools and analytics in order to facillitate data gathering and
provide accurate and timely information for decision making.
IT Investment Priority
60%
50%
50%
41%
40% 37% 36%
34%
31% 32%
30% 27% 26%
24%
20%
10%
0%
BI/analytics Infrastructure and data Cloud ERP Mobile
center
2014 2015
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 202
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
SESSION REVIEW
1. Data quality dimensions: completeness, validity, accuracy,
consistency, integrity, timeliness.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 203
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
REFERENCES
• EQAVET (n.d.), Mission. Available at: http://www.eqavet.eu/gns/about-eqavet/mission.aspx;
• Gartner (2015), CIO Agenda insights. Available at:
http://www.gartner.com/imagesrv/cio/pdf/cio_agenda_insights2015.pdf;
Images:
• Gartner (2017), Magic Quadrant. Available at: https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-
3TYE0CD&ct=170221&st=sb;
• Microsoft (2017), Power BI - Service dashboards. Available at: https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-
us/documentation/powerbi-service-dashboards/;
• Qlik (2017), Nprinting. Available at: http://www.qlik.com/us/products/nprinting;
• SAP (2016), SAP Crystal Dashboard Design 2016. Available at:
https://www.sapstore.com/solutions/99046/SAP-Crystal-Dashboard-Design-2016;
• Spider Strategies (2020), QuickScore. Available at: http://www.integerperform.com/kpi-dashboard-
balanced-scorecard-software;
• Tableau (2017), Pediatrics Dashboard. Available at:
https://www.tableau.com/solutions/gallery/pediatrics-overview;
• The KPI Institute (2017), Call Center Performance Management Toolkit. Available at:
https://marketplace.kpiinstitute.org/call-center-performance-management-system-toolkit.html.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data
Data Data Course 204
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering
Gathering Visualization
AGENDA
10 Data visualization
1. Guidelines to design efficient templates
2. Usability in terms of visual design
3. Scorecard and dashboard design
B D
A
C
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 206
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
DESIGN GRAPHS TO ILLUSTRATE KPI RESULTS
28% 33%
24%
15%
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 207
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
5.17% 11.40%
9.13% 5.16%
9.80% 5.06%
5.31%
23.71% 16.79%
8.46%
Biscotti Capuccino
Coffee Grinder Coffee Pot Biscotti Capuccino
Croissant Espresso Coffee Grinder Coffee Pot
Latte Mug Croissant Espresso
Scone Thermos Latte Mug
Scone Thermos
Product Share
Latte
Latte 23,71% Croissant
Croissant 16,79% Biscotti
Biscotti 11,40% Mug
Mug 9,80% Scone
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 208
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
DATA VISUALIZATION GUIDELINES (1)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 209
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
DATA VISUALIZATION GUIDELINES (2)
Graphical Representation Checklist:
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI Data KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 210
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Visualization Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
DATA VISUALIZATION GUIDELINES (3)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 211
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
COMMONLY USED GRAPHS IN PRACTICE
Bar charts
1
Bullet graphs
2
3 Dial charts
4 Line charts
5 Pie charts
6
Sparkline
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 212
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
BAR CHARTS
For comparing individual values
Column chart Bar chart
2013 Revenue split by segment (%)
1 25
Revenues (EUR billions)
France
20
2
2 15
10
North America
Emerging markets
5
UK & Ireland
3
0
3 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Germany & Austria
Japan
4
4 Stacked-bar chart
Benelux
Gender distribution in 2013 (%)
Italy
5
5 All managers Nordics
6 Branch managers
LHH
Switzerland
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 213
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
BULLET GRAPH
To compare actual results with targets
Thresholds (Under target, within tolerance limits, above targets)
1 % Community Target
satisfaction
2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Actual performance
3 % Medical practitioner
satisfaction
4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
% Practice manager
5 satisfaction
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6
% Pharmacist satisfaction
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data
Data Course 214
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
DIAL CHARTS
Useful for signalling threshold values
Projects on time
Source: Adapted from http://dashboard.virginiadot.org/default.aspx
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 215
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
LINE CHART
Useful for tracking trends
Net profit margin (%)
1 14.0%
12.0%
10.0%
2 8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
3 2.0%
0.0%
4
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Net profit (EUR million)
6,000
5,000
5 4,000
3,000
6 2,000
1,000
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 216
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
PIE CHART
Useful for comparing different parts of a whole
% Net sales by segment
1 Banking (1,497 € m) Retail (742 € m)
2 33%
3 67%
43%
6 49%
13%
51%
29%
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 217
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
SPARKLINE
Useful for showing data trends in a condensed manner
KPI 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Trend
1 # Customer satisfaction with HR solutions,
84 84 84 80 100
product and services
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 218
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
1 3D
2 Pie chart
5 Scales from 0
6
Background
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 219
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
3D or not?
1 90
80
2
70
60
3
50
4 40
30
5
20
10
6
0
1 2 3 4 5
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 220
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
3D or not?
1 90 82
77
80 71
2
70 62
60
3 51
50
4 40
30
5
20
10
6
0
1 2 3 4 5
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 221
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
Avoid 3D graphics
Canada Singapore Canada Singapore
1 30% 30%
30%
25%
30%
25%
25% 19.4% 19.3% 18.6% 17.9% 25% 19.4% 19.3% 18.6% 17.9%
20% 20%
20% 20% 14.7%
14.7%
12.8% 13.4% 13.2% 15% 15% 12.8% 13.4% 13.2%
15% 15%
2 10% 10% 10% 10%
5% 5% 5% 5%
0% 0% 0% 0%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012
3 % Health expenditure % Health
2009 2010 2011
% Health expenditure
2012 2009 2010 2011
% Health expenditure
2012
expenditure
6 0%
2009 2010 2011 2012
0%
2009 2010 2011 2012
0%
2009 2010 2011 2012
0%
2009 2010 2011 2012
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 222
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
Pie charts: Inefficient use of space
Federal Spending for United States (2014) Federal Spending for United States
(2014)
1 Transportation, 3%
Protection, 1%
General
Government , 1%Other spending,
1% Other spending 1%
Education, 3%
2 Interest, 6%
General Government 1%
Protection 1%
Healthcare, 27%
Transportation 3%
3 Welfare, 11% Education 3%
Interest 6%
4 Wefare 11%
Defense 22%
5 Defense, 22%
Pensions 25%
Healthcare 27%
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 223
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
Doughnut charts = an ink saving version of pie-charts
2009 2010 2011
1
Fixed
18% 19% Fixed 12%
20%
13%
21% Fixed
2 Base salary
Variable
Base salary
Variable
Base salary
Variable
Bonus Bonus
Bonus
36% PSP 39%
3 29%
34% PSP 32% AZIP
27% PSP
AZIP
AZIP
4 2010
2009 2011
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 224
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
Avoid crowded graphs
Sales by product
¥300.0
1
¥250.0
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 225
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
Avoid crowded graphs
2010 2011
¥300.0 ¥300.0
1 ¥250.0 ¥250.0
*The black line represents the average ¥200.0 ¥200.0
value of the 5 analyzed years
2 *The green column represents the average
¥150.0 ¥150.0
¥50.0 ¥50.0
3
¥0.0 ¥0.0
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 226
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication” – Leonardo DaVinci
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 227
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
Scales should start from 0
Capital expenditure and cash flow form operating activities
(EUR million)
1 3,500 3,290
2,992
3,000 2,842
2,566
2 2,500
2,405
2,273 2,356 2,359
2,499
1,991
2,000
3 1,500
3,000
5 2,500
2,000
1,500
6 1,000
500
0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 228
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
USABILITY IN TERMS OF VISUAL DESIGN
Background
Strong colors are not Avoid using strong gridlines, as they
1 recommended for backgrounds. hinder visibility of data.
Homeownership Rates by Region Homeownership Rates by Region
80%
70.0% 69.3%
80% 70.0%69.3%
65.0% 66.5% 66.5% 65.0%64.8% 66.5%66.5%
2
70% 64.8% 62.5% 62.4% 70% 62.5%62.4%
59.4% 59.4% 59.4%59.4%
60% 60%
50% 50%
40%
40%
30%
30%
3 20%
10%
20%
10%
0%
United States Northeast Midwest South West 0%
United States Northeast Midwest South West
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 229
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
KPI TOOLKIT SPOTLIGHT: BALANCED SCORECARD
Perspective / Goal smartKPIs. Standard Previous Current Trend Target % Target Results Comments
Strategic Objectives / KPIs com # reporting Period Results complete
frequency Results
Customer - 1 Strategic Objectives / 2 KPIs
Maintain high levels of internal customer satisfaction
% Internal customer satisfaction with HR service levels sK2379 Q 85% 75% 90% 83%
# Complaints received
Financial - 2 Strategic Objectives / 3 KPIs
sK2038 Q 0 1
k 0 50%
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 230
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
IN PRACTICE: SCORECARD
Medicare Australia BSC Actual
2006-07
Actual
2007-08
Target
2008-09
Actual
2008-09
Finance
Revenue $626.0 m $691.0 m $707.8 M $713.9 M
• The BSC perspectives can be Operating Expense
Net result
$623.7 m
$2.3 m
$697.3 m
($6.3 m)
$724.6 M
($16.8 M)
$722.3 M
($8.4 M)
• For more consistency, the target Overall staff satisfaction 79% 70% The 2009 staff scheduled for
October 2009.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 231
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
IN PRACTICE: SCORECARD
Department of Treasury and Finance, Victoria Government Procurement
Department of Treasury and
NOTE: THIS IS AN INTERACTIVE TOOL FOR USE Finance
KPI for Supplier performance
scorecard
Supplier Name Contract reference Month Year
Variance
Accepta
Key Performance Indicator Score This from
Area Performance Target Measurement Purpose ble Trend
(KPI) month Acceptabl
Score
e Score
Goods or service are Count of good services that are Rejection of goods services adds
Quality Compliant Specification provided to contracted
specification x% of time
rejected as unsuitable for
consumption
cost to the business and may delay
delivery of projects
0
1
x% of Goods or services are Count of orders that are received Late delivery of orders or other
On time provided on date time incomplete later than expected or deliverables may add time and cost 0
required required delivery time to delivery of projects
Delivery
Detective goods and/or services
Less than x% of goods service Count of orders that are received
Secure/no Damage orders may add time and cost to 0
are detective on receipt by detective and unable to be used
delivery of projects
All goods services are
Count of rejected invoiced as a Incorrect pricing leads to increased
Cost To Contract invoiced at contracted rate 0
consequence of incorrect pricing administrative costs
or less
x% of operational issues are Unresolved issues and stress to the
Count of issues unresolved within
Customer Service Issue resolution resolved within X hours of relationship and could add both cost 0
turn time
notification and time to delivery
Supplier presents innovative
Continues improvement and
and creative supply chain
Count of relevant initiatives innovation adds value to the
Innovation Creative solutions solutions to increase 0
presented relationship and has potential to
performance across one or
reduce costs
more KPI areas
Risk adds complexity to service
Supplier actively manages Presentation of information
delivery and potentially adds to
Risk Risk is managed and reports to Vic govt that demonstrating active mitigation of 0
both political sensitivity and public
known risks are mitigated known risks
health issues
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 232
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
SCORECARD DESIGN
Checklist:
• Numerical guide (to show if data has been shrunk, if this is
the case);
• Legend;
• Eliminate and minimize grids;
• Delineate and group data (strategic themes, perspectives,
objectives);
• Outline status of results ( ≥target, acceptable range,<target);
• Provide essential data (not nice to know information);
• Align characters appropriately;
• Use optimal size font for easy reading.
Source: CLIMB (n.d.)
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 233
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
KPI TOOLKIT SPOTLIGHT: DASHBOARD
Human Resources Performance Dashboard
Period Sep 2020
Recruitment Retention
# Employment brand strength
% Staffing rate Target
Q4 11 87
99%
Q3 11 66 82% 89% 86% 80% 88% 76% # Average time to
Q2 11 64 66% 74% 56%
72%
56% 67% promotion
Q1 11 81
0
0
0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
0 2016 2017 Q4 11 4
0 50 100 Q3 11 4
Q2 11 3
% Job offer acceptance rate # Applicant ratio Target
Q1 11 2
Q4 11 83% 10 0
Q3 11 65% 8 9 8
6 7 6 7 7 0
Q2 11 91% 4
Q1 11 55% 3 3 0
1
0% 0
0% Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
0% 0 2 4 6
0% 2016 2017
0% 50% 100%
Workforce profile
% Accession rate Target % Succession plans for key positions Target
19% 17%
14% 12% 14% 12% 10% 14%
9% 7% 9% 10% 9% 9% 7% 7%
10%
4% 6% 6% 4%
3% 3% 2%
0% 0%
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
2016 2017 2016 2017
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 234
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
IN PRACTICE: DASHBOARD
Emergency Department Dashboard, Australia
Emergency Dept Dashboard
Data Current To 26/07/2013 Help
20:30
Excludes high
Hospital Status priority cases Wait to See Treat Wait For Total Time in ED
FMC Streams
Avg wait (mins)
Hos EA WTBS Com Treat Cap Ÿ # Stream Tot WOT * Tot Tot WOT * 0-2 2-3 3-4 4-8 8+ EECL Tot
MH 2 8 20 19 = 32 MENTAL HEALTH 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 5
NHS 1 3 20 31 = 60 PAEDIATRICS 1 0 5 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 6
RAH 2 8 68 64 = 67 RESUSCITATION 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
WCHP 3 3 40 26 = 40 UNCLASSIFIED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
FMC Expected Arrivals FMC Departures (Last 1Hr) FMC Triage Categories FMC 24 Hour Activity
Category Total Departure Type Total Cat. WTS WOT * Oth Tot
90
AMB 2 2 Admitted to this hospital 2 1 0 0 1 1
80
AMB 5 1 Discharged 7 2 0 0 9 9
70
Other 0 3 8 6 = 32 40 60
Transferred to other Hosp 1 4 4 2 = 9 13 50
Total 3 Total 10 Total 12 8 53 55 40
30
FMC Waiting Times 20
0-2 2-4 4-8 8-12 12-24 24+ Total 10
Waiting to be seen 11 1 0 0 0 0 12 0
21:00
0:00
3:00
6:00
9:00
12:00
15:00
18:00
21:00
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Waiting for Radiology
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Waiting for IP Consult
9 4 3 0 0 0 16
Waiting for a Bed
Patients: 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 235
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
IN PRACTICE: DASHBOARD
Franklin Lakes Police Department, USA
• No contrast
background, no
strong grids;
• Interactive charts,
providing more
details for each set
of data.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data
Data Course 236
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
Visualization
IN PRACTICE: DASHBOARD
The KPI Institute, Quickscore - SpiderStrategies
• Background
designed based on
thresholds to
provide instant
understanding of
performance
results;
• Monthly evolution
trends.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 237
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
DEVELOP THE HR DASHBOARD
Scenario:
• As Human Resources manager, you realized that the departmental
scorecard does not provide sufficient data to inform your decisions. In
this context, you decide to develop HR dashboard to have more insights
into everyday operations.
Tasks:
• Select the most relevant KPIs for the clusters already identified.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 238
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
DEVELOP THE HR DASHBOARD
Working environment No.KPIs
1 # Applicant ratio
2 $ Average hourly compensation rate
3 # Compensation satisfaction index
4 # Entry level wage to local minimum wage
Talent development 5 # Employee engagement index
6 # Employee tenure
7 % Employees satisfied with compensation
% Employees that leave the organization in 6
8
month after hire
Recruitment 9 # Employment brand strength
10 # Employment offer acceptance rate
11 % Internal promotion rate
12 % Involuntary termination rate
13 % Performance appraisals completed on time
Retention 14 % Positions with succession plans completed
15 % New hire retention
16 # Sick leave days
17 # Time lost per health & safety incident
Compensation 18 $ Training cost per full time equivalent (FTE)
19 % Training return on investment
20 % Unscheduled absence rate
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 239
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
KPI TOOLKIT SPOTLIGHT: PERFORMANCE HEALTHOGRAM
Perspective smartKPIs. Standard Previous Period Current Trend * Target % Target Results Comments
Dimensions / KPIs com # reporting Results Results complete
frequency
Resources - 2 Dimensions / 4 KPIs
Financial
% Operating budget spent sK7046 Q 90% 92% k 100% 92% R
% Operating expense rate
Talent
sK2046 Q 39% 47%
k 50% 94% R
Talent development
# Training hours per departmental full time equivalent (FTE) sK7 Q 10 30 k 20 150% ü
% Employees meeting continuing professional development requirements
Innovation
sK4673 Q 74% 96% k 80% 120% R
% Positions with Professional Development Plans in place sK6772 Q 97% 89% 80% 111% R
% Performance appraisals completed on time
Project management
sK769 Q 75% 95% k 90% 105% R
% Processes optimized
Stakeholders - 3 Dimensions / 6 KPIs
sK2284 Q 82% 94% k 85% 111% R
Internal customers
% Internal customers satisfaction with service levels sK1290 Q 62% 92% k 80% 115% R
# Satisfaction of employees with departmental services
Departmental employees
sK2038 Q 5 10 k 10 100% R
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 240
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
MANAGING PERFORMANCE THROUGH KPI
REPORTING
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 241
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
SESSION REVIEW
1. Scorecards use tables to visualize data, therefore:
• It keeps tables simple;
• No grids, no strong color combination;
• Clusters data based on strategic themes, perspectives or objectives.
2. Dashboards:
• Bar charts: to compare individual values;
• Bullet graphs: to compare actual results to targets;
• Dial charts: to indicate threshold values;
• Line charts: to track trends;
• Pie charts: to compare different parts of a whole;
• Sparklines: to show trends in a condensed manner.
3. Avoid using:
• 3D graphs: distort data;
• Pie and donut charts: inefficient use of space;
• Crowded graphs: data is no longer visible;
• Strong colors for backgrounds: hinder visibility.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 242
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
REFERENCES
• Adecco Group (2013), Annual report 2013. Available at:
http://annualreport2013.adecco.com/fileadmin/user_upload/redakteure/ar2013/pdf/Adecco_Group_A
R2013.pdf;
• Astra Zeneca (2012), Annual report 2011. Available at: http://www.astrazeneca-
annualreports.com/2011/documents/pdfs/annual_report_pdf_entire.pdf;
• Centrelink (2010), Annual report 2009-10, available at:
http://www.humanservices.gov.au/spw/corporate/publications-and-resources/annual-
report/resources/0910/centrelink-annual-report-0910-full-report.pdf;
• Digital Inspiration (2012), Choose the right chart type for your data, available at:
http://www.labnol.org/software/find-right-chart-type-for-your-data/6523/;
• Domo (2011), How Fort Worth Police Department uses domo. Available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKbakXit9H4;
• Equinox Center (2014), Quality of life dashboard. Available at:
http://www.equinoxcenter.org/assets/files/2014%20Final%20Dashboard%281%29.pdf;
• Fusion Charts (2013), Line & area charts, available at:
http://www.fusioncharts.com/demos/gallery/#line-and-area;
• Hichert (2006), Skalen ud deren manipulation, available at:
http://www.hichert.com/downloads/success/check/Skalenmanipulation_2006-11.pdf;
• MuRata (2014), Investor relations. Available at:
http://www.murata.com/ir/information/sales_product/index.html;
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 243
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
REFERENCES
• SA Health (2013), Emergency department dashboard. Available at:
http://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/about+us/our+p
erformance/our+hospital+dashboards/about+the+emergency+department+dashboard/emergency+depar
tment+dashboard;
• Spider Strategies (2020), QuickScore. Available at: http://www.integerperform.com/kpi-dashboard-
balanced-scorecard-software;
• The KPI Institute (2017), KPIs Infographic. Available at: https://library.kpiinstitute.org/key-
performance-indicators-infographic-976.html.html;
• Tufte, E. (1983), The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press;
• Tufte, E. (2001), Presenting data and information, One-day course, September 17, 2001. New York;
• Unilever (2013), Making sustainable living commonplace, available at:
http://www.unilever.com/images/ir_UNI_10-Year_Charts_2013_030314_tcm13-384260.pdf;
• United Stated Census Bureau (2008), Housing vacancies and homeownership, available at:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/hvs/qtr407/graph407.html;
• United States Government (2014), US Federal Budget Pie. Available at:
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_budget_pie;
• United States Office of Personnel (2012), Annual performance report 2011. Available at:
https://www.opm.gov/about-us/budget-performance/performance/2011-annual-report.pdf
• World Bank (2014), Data. Available at:
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.XPN.TOTL.GD.ZS/countries/1W-DE?display=default;
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 244
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
REFERENCES
Images:
• CLIMB (n.d.), Best practices in designing tables. Available at:
http://www.northwestern.edu/climb/resources/written-communication/Best-Practices-Tables.html;
• Equinox Center (2014), Quality of life dashboard. Available at:
http://www.equinoxcenter.org/assets/files/2014%20Final%20Dashboard%281%29.pdf;
• Franklin Lakes (2014), Performance dashboards. Available at:
http://dashboard.revelstonelabs.net/entities/281;
• Medicare Australia (2010), Annual report 2009-10. Available at:
http://www.humanservices.gov.au/spw/corporate/publications-and-resources/annual-
report/resources/0910/centrelink-annual-report-0910-full-report.pdf;
• The KPI Institute (2017), Human Resources Performance Management Toolkit. Available at:
https://marketplace.kpiinstitute.org/hr-performance-management-system-toolkit.html;
• The KPI Institute (2017), Medical Center Performance Management Toolkit. Available at:
https://marketplace.kpiinstitute.org/medical-practice-performance-management-system-toolkit.html;
• The KPI Institute (2017), Performance Healthogram. Available at: http://kpiinstitute.org/research/about-
performance-management/performance-healthogram/;
• Victoria Government Procurement (n.d.), Supplier performance scorecard. Available at:
http://www.procurement.vic.gov.au/CA2575BA0001417C/WebObj/KPIandSupplierPerformanceScorecardTool(Ap
pendix6)/$File/KPI%20and%20Supplier%20Performance%20Scorecard%20Tool%20(Appendix%206).XLS;
• World Bank (2014), World Bank global scorecard. Available at:
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/CSCARDEXT/Resources/2014_WBG_corporate_scorecard_e-version.pdf;
• University of California (2013), Division of Hospital Medicine Faculty Balanced Scorecard FY 2012. Available at:
http://hospitalmedicine.ucsf.edu/bsc/fy2012.html.
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data
Data Course 245
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization
Visualization
COURSE REVIEW
10 takeaways to implement in your organization:
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course
Course 246
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization Review
COURSE REVIEW
10 takeaways to implement in your organization:
© The KPI Institute 2020 The World Understand KPI KPI Working with Data Data Course
Course 247
KPI Typology KPI Taxonomy Selection KPI Alignment Documentation Review
of KPIs KPIs Targets Gathering Visualization Review
European Division Middle East Division SE Asia Division Headquarters
Sibiu Office Dubai Office Kuala Lumpur Office Melbourne Office
Sibiu City Center Regalia Business Centre, 1st floor, Wisma UOA II Life.lab Building
Somesului Street, No. 3 Office 101 – Suite 11, Level 14, Unit 13, no 21, 198 Harbour Esplanade,
550003 - Sibiu, Baysquare Building 3, Business Jalan Pinang, 50450 Suite 606, Melbourne Docklands,
Romania Bay, 213297, Dubai, UAE Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia VIC 3008, Australia
M: + 40 774 968 693 T: +971 4 563 7316 T: +60 3 2742 1357 T: +61 3 9028 2223
[email protected] M: +971 55 787 6427 M: +60 12 591 1366 M: +61 4 2456 8088
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]