Sustainability 15 14344
Sustainability 15 14344
Article
Experimental Design and Breakthrough Curve Modeling
of Fixed-Bed Columns Utilizing a Novel 3D Coconut-Based
Polyurethane-Activated Carbon Composite Adsorbent for
Lead Sequestration
Rubie Mae D. Fernandez 1,2 , Renz John R. Estrada 1 , Tomas Ralph B. Tomon 1,2 , Roger G. Dingcong, Jr. 1 ,
Ruben F. Amparado, Jr. 2 , Rey Y. Capangpangan 3 , Roberto M. Malaluan 1,4 , Gerard G. Dumancas 5 ,
Alona A. Lubguban 6 , Arnold C. Alguno 1,7 , Hernando P. Bacosa 1,2 and Arnold A. Lubguban 1,4, *
1 Center for Sustainable Polymers, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Philippines;
[email protected] (R.M.D.F.); [email protected] (R.J.R.E.);
[email protected] (T.R.B.T.); [email protected] (R.G.D.J.);
[email protected] (R.M.M.); [email protected] (A.C.A.);
[email protected] (H.P.B.)
2 Environmental Science Graduate Program, Department of Biological Sciences,
College of Science and Mathematics, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Philippines;
[email protected]
3 Department of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, College of Marine and Allied Sciences,
Mindanao State University at Naawan, Naawan 9023, Philippines; [email protected]
4 Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology,
Iligan City 9200, Philippines
5 Department of Chemistry, The University of Scranton, Scranton, PA 18510, USA;
Citation: Fernandez, R.M.D.;
Estrada, R.J.R.; Tomon, T.R.B.;
[email protected]
6 Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Studies, Rural High School, University of the
Dingcong, R.G., Jr.; Amparado, R.F.,
Philippines, Paciano Rizal, Bay 4033, Philippines; [email protected]
Jr.; Capangpangan, R.Y.; Malaluan, 7 Department of Physics, College of Science and Mathematics, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology,
R.M.; Dumancas, G.G.; Lubguban, Iligan City 9200, Philippines
A.A.; Alguno, A.C.; et al. * Correspondence: [email protected]
Experimental Design and
Breakthrough Curve Modeling of Abstract: This study presents a novel polyurethane-activated carbon composite (PACC) as an effective
Fixed-Bed Columns Utilizing and sustainable adsorbent for treating lead-ion-contaminated waters. The PACC was characterized
a Novel 3D Coconut-Based
using Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), Fourier Transform
Polyurethane-Activated Carbon
Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface area analyzer, X-ray Diffrac-
Composite Adsorbent for Lead
tion (XRD), and Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA) to evaluate its physicochemical and thermal
Sequestration. Sustainability 2023, 15,
properties. Furthermore, the PACC was employed in an experimental column adsorption setup to
14344. https://doi.org/10.3390/
su151914344 investigate its adsorption performance and to develop a dynamic method suitable for industrial
implementation. Parameters such as bed height (50, 100, 150 mm), flow rate (4, 6, 8 mL min−1 ),
Academic Editor: Agostina Chiavola
pH (2, 4, 6), and initial metal-ion concentrations (10, 50, 100 mg L−1 ) were examined. The exper-
Received: 2 September 2023 imental data exhibited strong agreement with the Thomas and Yoon–Nelson models (R2 ≥ 0.96),
Revised: 25 September 2023 indicating efficient adsorption mechanisms. Remarkably, the used adsorbent has the potential for
Accepted: 27 September 2023 facile regeneration without substantial loss in capacity. The PACC demonstrated excellent adsorption
Published: 28 September 2023 performance for lead ions in aqueous solutions in a fixed-bed column system. Thus, the novel PACC
material holds the potential for scalable application in industrial settings to address water pollution
challenges, especially in regions with uncontrolled effluent discharge.
tems. Multiple sources, including industrial waste, soil leaching, and petroleum products,
contribute significantly to the presence of these heavy metals [1]. Lead (Pb) has garnered
considerable interest, especially given its extensive application across multiple industrial
domains [2]. Drinking water is a primary source of Pb2+ that enters the food web, and
as a result, the World Health Organization has established a maximum allowable limit of
48 nmol/L for Pb2+ in drinking water [3]. Exceeding this limit can lead to severe health
complications [4]
Various physical and chemical techniques are at our disposal to eliminate contami-
nants, such as filtration, electrocoagulation, reverse osmosis, precipitation, biosorption,
and adsorption. The costs associated with implementing and operating these techniques
vary significantly, as does their efficacy in removing contaminants. Adsorption-based
methods, in particular, often offer cost advantages in terms of infrastructure and operation,
although the efficiency of eliminating the contaminants relies on the properties inherent
to the utilized sorbent. Despite the numerous industrial adsorbents available for heavy
metal removal in wastewater, there is a growing interest in the advancement of sustain-
able biosorbents. This interest stems from their renewable abundance and potential for
incorporation into composite materials [5].
The utilization of activated carbon (AC) has become popular due to its excellent
adsorption performance. However, the effective reusability of AC poses challenges due to
the complexity of recovery methods [6]. In many instances, modifications are necessary
to enhance the affinity of conventional AC towards specific pollutants. This is because
common AC may exhibit limitations in adsorption capacity due to its small specific surface
area, elevated ash content, inadequate adsorption selectivity, restricted surface functional
groups, and electrochemical properties [7,8]. Additionally, powdered AC tends to disperse
in water, resulting in poor recyclability, potential secondary contamination, and cost-
intensive operational procedures, rendering it unsuitable for treating high-flux effluents [9].
Alternative materials such as fly ash and biomass have a historical precedent as
the foundation for composite adsorbents. Although this method effectively prevents
aggregation and yields favorable adsorption outcomes, it is crucial to acknowledge that
most of these composite materials exist in powdered form. The use of powdered adsorbents
in water treatment encounters practical issues, notably bed cracking and column blockage,
especially in column experiments [10]. These issues result in elevated back pressure and
decreased operational efficiency. Such limitations diminish the applicability of powdered
materials for large-scale water treatment processes [10]. To address these challenges and
enhance the viability of wastewater treatment technology, the development of adsorbent
structures with three-dimensional (3D) geometries has been proposed [11]. Additionally,
the structural deterioration observed within adsorbent bodies after multiple adsorption
cycles poses a substantial barrier to long-term operational success [12].
Recognizing these challenges, extensive research has been performed using polyurethane
(PU) in heavy metal treatment [13]. PU foam is a promising and cost-effective material
that exhibits favorable thermodynamics for sequestering and binding cations, therefore
proving successful in the heavy metals and volatile compounds eradication from wastew-
ater and aqueous systems [14]. The manufacturing and shaping of PU adsorbents are
relatively straightforward, adding to their appeal [15]. The characteristics of the resulting
foam are significantly influenced by the choice of polyol, the key starting material for
PU [16]. Although petroleum-based polyols are commonly employed, their limited avail-
ability and environmental concerns have spurred investigations into alternative bio-based
polyol sources.
In the present study, a novel coconut oil (CO)-based polyurethane foam-activated
carbon composite (PACC) is formulated to address reusability, economic, environmental,
and sustainability concerns. The process starts with the sequential glycerolysis and amida-
tion of CO to produce bio-based polyol [17]. This polyol was then employed along with
AC in a PU formulation to produce a PACC material. Moreover, the produced PACC is
designed to exhibit excellent chemical and thermal stability, enhanced accessibility, and
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 3 of 23
for the preparation of the PU foam samples is provided in Table 1. The quantities of each
additive were determined based on a ratio of 100 parts by weight relative to the total polyol
components. The isocyanate index for the foam is 100.
Table 1. Integration of A-side components, B-side components, and filler in the formulation of
polyurethane-activated carbon composite (PACC) material.
Concentration
Ingredients
(Based on 100 Parts Polyol)
B-side Components
VORANOL® 4701 (petroleum-based polyol) 80.00
Coconut-based polyol 20.00
Polycat® 8 (gelling catalyst) 0.50
INV® 690 (surfactant) 1.75
Silicon oil 5.00
Fillers
Coconut activated carbon 40.00
A-side Component
Isocyanate index of PAPI® 27 100.0
Following the curing procedure, the foam specimens were allowed to stand undis-
turbed overnight before being sectioned into cubes with 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm dimensions for
subsequent testing.
2.5. Characterization
The analysis of surface morphology for both the untreated polyurethane (PU) and
polyurethane with activated carbon (PACC) samples was conducted by utilizing a scanning
electron microscope (SEM) (JSM-6510LA Analytical Scanning Electron Microscope, Tokyo,
Japan). The determination of the open-cell content (OCC) was carried out utilizing a
nitrogen pycnometer (ULTRAPYC 1200e Automatic Density Analyzer, Boynton Beach, FL,
USA). The surface area and pore size of the composite material were measured with a
surface area analyzer (Microtrac BELSORP MINI X, Osaka, Japan). To discern the functional
groups present in the composite, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was
employed (Shimadzu FTIR-ATR IR Tracer-100, Tokyo, Japan) across a spectral range of
4000–400 cm−1 . Thermal degradation analysis was executed through Thermogravimetric
Analysis (TGA) in a nitrogen atmosphere, employing a Shimadzu DTG 60H instrument
(Tokyo, Japan), with a constant flow rate of 20 mL min−1 and a temperature increment of
10 ◦ C per minute. The pH values were determined using a digital pH meter (KEM AT-710,
Kyoto, Japan). X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns were captured using a Rigaku HR-XRD
instrument (SMART Lab, 9 kW power type) equipped with a Cu K-α radiation source
(40 kV and 30 mA). The measurements encompassed the range of 3–60 degrees 2θ, and the
scanning speed was set at 0.02 degrees 2θ/0.60 s.
where Q represents the flow rate (expressed in mL min−1 ), A signifies the area under the
curve, t denotes the total duration of the run (measured in minutes), and Cad represents the
amount of adsorbed concentration of Pb2+ ions in milligrams per liter (mg L−1 ).
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 6 of 23
Equation (2) was employed for the calculation of the maximum metal uptake, denoted
as qeq , within the continuous adsorption system. Additionally, Equation (3) was employed
to calculate the total volume of effluent, Veff , expressed as follows:
qtotal
qeq = (2)
m
Ve f f = Qttotal (3)
where m represents the continuous system’s dry weight.
where kAB signifies the Bohart–Adams rate constant (measured in L mg−1 min−1 ); N0
represents the saturation concentration (measured in mg L−1 ); t signifies the flow time
(measured in minutes); Z denotes the bed height (measured in centimeters); and U0
indicates the superficial velocity (measured in cm min−1 ).
Conversely, the Yoon–Nelson model is based on the concept of diminishing adsorp-
tion probability [21]. In prior research, the Yoon–Nelson model has been mathematically
formulated in a linearized manner for the analysis of individual systems [26,27]:
Ct
ln ( ) = kYN t − τkYN (6)
C0 − C t
where kYN for the Yoon–Nelson rate constant (measured in min−1 ); τ represents the time
required for 50% breakthrough of the adsorbate (measured in minutes); and t signifies the
breakthrough time.
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 7 of 23
Figure 2. SEM images of blank polyurethane foam (a.1,a.2), polyurethane-activated carbon composite
Figure 2. polyurethane-activated
(b.1,b.2), SEM images of blank polyurethane
carbon composite after foam (a.1,a.2),
lead adsorption polyurethane-activated ca
(c.1,c.2).
site (b.1,b.2), polyurethane-activated carbon composite after lead adsorption (c.1,c.2).
Table 2. Elemental composition comparison of blank PU (a), PACC (b), and PACC after
tion (c).
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 8 of 23
Table 2 presents the elemental composition analysis of blank PU and PACC using EDX.
After the integration of activated carbon (AC) into the polyurethane (PU) matrix, there was
an observed rise in carbon content by 1.85% and oxygen content by 9.87%. Conversely, the
nitrogen content displayed a relative decrease of 2.00%. Enhanced levels of O/C and (O +
N)/C values correspond to an increased degree of negative polarity in the material [30]. As
presented in Table 2, PACC demonstrates notably elevated O/C ratio and (O + N)/C ratios
of 35.55% and 17.65%, respectively, in comparison to the blank PU. This finding implies the
creation of a higher number of sorption sites within PACC, which enhances its potential for
the sequestration of Pb2+ ions. These observed variations in composition can be attributed
to the intrinsic hydroxyl groups in AC, resulting in an enhanced oxygen concentration in
the PACC. PACC exhibits a significant presence of oxygen-containing functional groups,
which have been previously reported to facilitate the adsorption of Pb2+ [31]. After the
adsorption process, the O/C ratio and (O + N)/C ratios experienced a reduction of 37.70%
and 31.25%, respectively. This is ascribed to the depolarization of the participating amino
and oxygen-containing groups during their interaction with Pb2+ , therefore reducing the
PACC’s negative polarity during the Pb2+ adsorption process [32]. Thus, this observation
relates to the successful interaction of Pb2+ to the PACC’s active sorption sites.
Table 2. Elemental composition comparison of blank PU (a), PACC (b), and PACC after lead adsorption (c).
Element Wt%
Difference Difference
a b c
(b−a) (c−b)
CK 53.28 ± 1.13 55.13 ± 1.05 56.11 ± 1.03 1.85 −4.02
NK 12.58 ± 1.00 10.58 ± 0.81 9.56 ± 0.79 −2.00 3.98
OK 23.73 ± 1.19 33.60 ± 1.22 21.27 ± 1.20 9.87 −4.33
SiK 1.31 ± 0.01 0.60 ± 0.01 0.51 ± 0.01
PtK 3.10 ± 0.80 0.09 ± 0.11 0.18 ± 0.09
PbK 0.00 0.00 12.37 ± 0.16
O/C 0.45 0.61 0.38 35.55% −37.70%
(O+N)/C 0.68 0.80 0.55 17.65% −31.25%
Figure 3. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of blank polyurethane foam, polyurethane-
Figure 3. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of blank polyurethane foam, polyurethane-acti-
activated carbon composite (PACC), and PACC after Pb adsorption.
vated carbon composite (PACC), and PACC after Pb adsorption.
3.1.3. Surface Area Analysis
3.1.3. Surface Areacharacteristics
The textural Analysis of both blank PU and PACC, encompassing specific surface
area
The and pore dimensions,
textural were of
characteristics examined utilizing
both blank a surface
PU and PACC, area analyzer via nitrogen
encompassing specific sur-
adsorption-desorption isotherms. The
face area and pore dimensions, were examined outcomes unveiled that the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
utilizing a surface area analyzer via nitro-
(BET) surface area of PU, quantified at 1.1817 m2 g−1 , exhibited a notable disparity in com-
gen adsorption-desorption isotherms. The outcomes unveiled that the Brunauer–Emmett–
parison to PACC before adsorption, which demonstrated a 2measurement of 10.8949 m2 g−1 .
Teller (BET) surface area of PU, quantified at 1.1817 m g⁻ 1, exhibited a notable disparity
This discrepancy underscores that the integration of activated carbon into the PU matrix
in prompted
comparison to PACC upsurge
a substantial before adsorption, which
In surface area, demonstrated
approximately a measurement
ten-fold, of 10.8949
therefore yielding
m ag⁻
2 1 . This of
plethora discrepancy
binding sitesunderscores that the integration
for effective sequestration 2+ of activatedthe
of Pb . Furthermore, carbon
averageinto
porethe PU
matrix prompted
sizes for a substantial
PU and PACC upsurgeasIn2.3406
were determined surface
nm area, approximately
and 0.9825 ten-fold,
nm, respectively. therefore
Reduced
pore dimensions
yielding a plethora lead
oftobinding
an enlarged
sitessurface area andsequestration
for effective an increased surface-to-volume ratio. the
of Pb2+. Furthermore,
This phenomenon
average pore sizes explains
for PU and the observed
PACC were augmentation
determined in the
asPACC’s
2.3406 surface
nm andarea [37]. nm, re-
0.9825
spectively. Reduced pore dimensions lead to an enlarged surface area and an increased
3.1.4. XRD Analysis
surface-to-volume ratio. This phenomenon explains the observed augmentation in the
Figure 4 portrays the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of both the blank PU and PACC
PACC’s surface area [37].
samples. The diffraction patterns exhibit a diffuse and subtle diffraction peak observed at
approximately 19◦ and 43◦ 2θ angles. These angles correspond to the distinctive diffraction
patterns associated with the amorphous carbon structure aligned with the (0 0 2) and
(1 0 0) crystallographic planes, respectively [38]. Furthermore, the presence of these peaks
at a subdued intensity implies a limited extent of graphitization, therefore implying the
presence of a carbonaceous structure with relatively low crystallinity [39].
Figure 4 portrays the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of both the blank PU and PACC
samples. The diffraction patterns exhibit a diffuse and subtle diffraction peak observed at
approximately 19° and 43° 2θ angles. These angles correspond to the distinctive diffrac-
tion patterns associated with the amorphous carbon structure aligned with the (0 0 2) and
(1 0 0) crystallographic planes, respectively [38]. Furthermore, the presence of these peaks
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 at a subdued intensity implies a limited extent of graphitization, therefore implying the 10 of 23
presence of a carbonaceous structure with relatively low crystallinity [39].
Figure 4. XRD profile of a blank polyurethane (PU) and polyurethane-activated carbon composite
Figure 4. XRD profile of a blank polyurethane (PU) and polyurethane-activated carbon composite
(PACC).
(PACC).
3.1.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis
3.1.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis
Figure 5 illustrates the thermal properties of blank PU, PACC, and PACC after adsorp-
Figure 5 illustrates the thermal properties of blank PU, PACC, and PACC after ad-
tion. The black lines represent the weight loss graph, whereas the red line corresponds to
sorption. The black lines represent the weight loss graph, whereas the red line corre-
the derivative thermogravimetry graph. In Figure 5a, the DTG graph of PU displays two
sponds to the derivative thermogravimetry graph. In Figure 5a, the ◦DTG graph of◦ PU dis-
notable
plays endothermic
two notable peakspeaks
endothermic located at approximately
located at approximately 184184C°C andand406
406 C.
°C.The
The mentioned
peaks suggest
mentioned the thermal
peaks suggest degradation
the thermal of the unique
degradation rigid and
of the unique rigidflexible segments
and flexible seg- of PU. The
rigid
ments of segments
PU. The rigidcansegments
be linked cantobethe presence
linked of urethane
to the presence bonds, bonds,
of urethane whereas the introduction
whereas
theof fatty acid chains
introduction into chains
of fatty acid the PUinto matrix
the PU affects
matrixthe flexible
affects segments
the flexible [17]. In
segments contrast, the
[17].
DTG examination
In contrast, of PACCofbefore
the DTG examination PACC and before following adsorption
and following adsorption discloses
disclosesthe
thepresence of
presence
severalofpeaks
severallocated
peaks located at approximately
at approximately 220 ◦ C, °C, ◦310
220310 ◦ C, °C,
°C, 400
C, 400 andand ◦ C,
440440 °C,
asasdisplayed in
displayed
Figure in Figure
5b,c. 5b,c. to
Similar Similar
pure to
PU, pure
thePU,peaksthe identified
peaks identified ◦
at 220at 220
C and 400 ◦400
°C and °C
C correspond to
correspond
the thermalto the thermal breakdown
breakdown of the urethane
of the urethane segmentssegments
and the andfatty
the fatty
acid acid com-
components within
ponents withinFurthermore,
the PACC. the PACC. Furthermore,
the extra peak the extra
canpeak can be ascribed
be ascribed to the thermal
to the thermal dis-
disintegration of the
integration of the activated carbon constituents incorporated into the composite [40]. Ad-
activated carbon constituents incorporated into the composite [40]. Additionally, the TGA-
Sustainability 2023, 14, x FOR PEER ditionally,
REVIEW the TGA-DTG curve of PACC following adsorption, as depicted in Figure 5c,
DTG curve of PACC following adsorption, as depicted in Figure 5c, displays comparable 11 of 25
displays comparable thermal degradation peaks to those of PACC in Figure 5b. This ob-
thermal degradation peaks to those of PACC in Figure 5b. This observation implies that
servation implies that the thermal stability of PACC was not compromised during the ad-
the thermal
sorption process.stability of PACC was not compromised during the adsorption process.
Figure 5. Cont.
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 11 of 23
Figure 5. TGA-DTG curves of (a) polyurethane (PU), (b) polyurethane-activated carbon composite
Figure
(PACC),5.and
TGA-DTG curves ofafter
(c) PACC composite (a) adsorption.
polyurethane (PU), (b) polyurethane-activated carbon com
(PACC), and (c) PACC composite after adsorption.
3.2. Effect of Dynamic Adsorption Parameters
Table 3 displays the data parameters obtained from the column under varying Pb con-
3.2. Effect of Dynamic Adsorption Parameters
centrations, bed heights, pH, and flow rates while maintaining a constant room temperature.
Table 3 displays the data parameters obtained from the column under varyin
Table 3. Data parameters
concentrations, bed attained at different
heights, pH, and bedflow
heights, pH, flow
rates rates,
while and inlet Pb concentrations
maintaining a constant room
(T = 28 ± 1 ◦ C).
perature.
Data parameters attained at different bed heights with constant initial concentration (50 mg L−1 ),
flow rate (4 mL min−1 ), and pH (6)
Total mass Equilibrium
Bed height Total time Effluent volume
adsorbed, qtotal uptake, qeq
(mm) (min) (mL)
(mg) (mg g−1 )
50 190 35.85 7.17 760
100 240 106.3 10.63 960
150 300 125.7 8.38 1200
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 12 of 23
Table 3. Cont.
Data parameters attained at different initial concentrations with constant bed height (100 mm),
flow rate (4 mL min−1 ), and pH (6)
Initial Total mass Equilibrium
Total time Effluent volume
Concentration adsorbed, qtotal uptake, qeq
(min) (mL)
(mg L−1 ) (mg) (mg g−1 )
10 290 94.6 9.46 1100
50 240 106.6 10.66 960
100 180 135.4 13.54 270
Data parameters attained at different flow rates with constant bed height (100 mm),
initial concentration (50 mg L−1 ), and pH (6)
Total mass Equilibrium
Flow rate Total time Effluent volume
adsorbed, qtotal uptake, qeq
(mL min−1 ) (min) (mL)
(mg) (mg g−1 )
4 250 106.6 10.66 1000
6 195 105.6 10.56 1170
8 150 86.6 8.66 1200
Data parameters attained at different pH with constant bed height (100 mm),
initial concentration (50 mg L−1 ), and flow rate (4 mL min−1 )
Total mass Equilibrium
Total time Effluent volume
pH adsorbed, qtotal uptake, qeq
(min) (mL)
(mg) (mg g−1 )
2 265 220.3 22.03 1060
4 300 280.0 28.00 1200
6 250 107.0 10.70 1000
Figure
Figure 6. Breakthrough
6. Breakthrough curves
curves for for Pb2+ on
Pb2+ adsorption adsorption on polyurethane-activated
polyurethane-activated carbon composite carbon composite
(PACC) at different bed heights.
(PACC) at different bed heights.
3.2.2. Effect of Flow Rate
To examine the influence of flow rate on Pb2+ adsorption using PACC, the flow rate
was subjected to variation (4, 6, and 8 mL min−1), keeping a consistent adsorbent bed
height of 100 mm, a pH level of 6, and a constant inlet concentration of Pb2+ at 50 mg L−1.
The outcomes of this investigation are presented in Figure 7, where the breakthrough
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 13 of 23
Figure 7. Breakthrough
Figure curves forcurves
7. Breakthrough for Pb2+
Pb2+ adsorption on adsorption
polyurethane-activated carbon composite
on polyurethane-activated carbon composite
(PACC) at different flow rates.
(PACC) at different flow rates.
The fundamental concepts of mass transfer clarify the variations noticed in the steep-
ness of the breakthrough curve and the adsorption capacity. Increased flow rates induce
a reduction in the hindrance to mass transfer posed by the external film at the surface of
the adsorbent, leading to an escalated rate of mass transfer and a decreased residence time.
Consequently, saturation is achieved more quickly, leading to decreased removal efficiency.
This implies that the amount of heavy metal adsorbed per unit of bed height, known as the
mass transfer zone, enlarges with higher flow rates, resulting in a more rapid attainment
of saturation capacity [22,44]. In contrast, inadequate solute residence time in the column
results in a decline in the adsorption capacity, as the solute exits the column before reaching
equilibrium. Similar patterns have been noted by other investigators [45–47].
Figure
Figure8. Breakthrough
8. Breakthroughcurves curves for Pb2+ adsorption
for Pb2+ adsorption on polyurethane-activated carbon composite
on polyurethane-activated carbon composite
(PACC) at different initial concentrations.
(PACC) at different initial concentrations.
An Effect
3.2.4. elevatedof
influent
pH concentration results in a more pronounced incline of the break-
through curve and a shorter breakthrough time, in accordance with findings from previ-
The[48].
ous studies pHThese
values exert
results a critical
suggest that theinfluence onaffects
concentration various aspects
the level of heavy metal behavior
of saturation
within the environment. Beyond its influence on the dissociation of
and breakthrough time, implying that the dispersion mechanism is influenced by theheavy
in- metal sites, pH
fluent concentration.
exerts a An
substantial increase
impact in the
on influent
solution concentration
chemistry led
by to an increase
contributing in the
to various processes,
Sustainability 2023, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 25
driving force for mass transfer, leading to a decrease in the length of the adsorption zone
including redox reactions, hydrolysis, complexation with organic
[22,49]. These findings are congruent with prior studies conducted on numerous fixed-
and/or inorganic ligands,
and precipitation. The pH
bed adsorption frameworks [47,50]. significantly governs these mechanisms and consequently has
3.2.4. Effect of pH
a notable effect on the availability of heavy metals for biosorption [51]. To assess how
The pH values exert a critical influence on various aspects of heavy metal behavior
pH levels
within affectBeyond
the environment. the efficiency
its influence onofthePb
2+ adsorption
dissociation bysites,
of heavy metal PACC,
pH a series of pH values ranging
exerts a substantial impact on solution chemistry by contributing to various processes,
from 2 to 6 were utilized for investigation. Throughout
including redox reactions, hydrolysis, complexation with organic and/or inorganic lig-
this experimentation, the bed
height (100 mm), flow rate (4 mL min ), and initial concentration (50 mg L−1 ) remained
ands, and precipitation. The pH significantly governs these − 1
mechanisms and consequently
has a notable effect on the availability of heavy metals for biosorption [51]. To assess how
constant. As shown in Figure 9, the breakthrough curve at pH = 2 shifted towards the left,
pH levels affect the efficiency of Pb2+ adsorption by PACC, a series of pH values ranging
indicating
from 2 to 6 were autilized
shorter breakthrough
for investigation. Throughout time. This occurrence
this experimentation, the bed can be explained by the higher
height (100 mm), flow rate (4 mL min−1), and initial concentration (50 mg L−1) remained
concentration of hydronium ions at lower pH levels, which competes effectively with Pb2+
constant. As shown in Figure 9, the breakthrough curve at pH = 2 shifted towards the left,
ions for
indicating interaction
a shorter breakthrough with the occurrence
time. This active sites of PACC
can be explained [52].
by the higher Although at pH values greater
concentration of 2+hydronium ions at lower pH levels, which competes effectively with Pb2+
than 6, Pb ions undergo solvation, hydrolysis, and
ions for interaction with the active sites of PACC [52]. Although at pH values greater than
lead oxide precipitation [53]. These
6,precipitates
Pb2+ ions undergo are unable
solvation, to be
hydrolysis, adsorbed
and lead by the
oxide precipitation PACC
[53]. foam, leading to a decrease in the
These precip-
itates are unable to be adsorbed by the PACC foam, leading to a decrease in the break-
breakthrough time, which occurred at 240 min. Hence, at a moderate pH (pH = 4), these
through time, which occurred at 240 min. Hence, at a moderate pH (pH = 4), these circum-
circumstances
stances can be mitigated,can be mitigated,
resulting resultingtime.
in the longest breakthrough in the longest breakthrough time.
Table 4. Thomas model parameters at different conditions using linear regression analysis.
kTh qTh
Parameter R2
(L mg−1 min−1 ) × 10−4 (mg g−1 )
Flow rate 4 2.11 0.3774 0.8801
(mL min−1 ) 6 3.13 0.3866 0.8764
8 4.32 0.9725 0.9122
Bed height (mm) 50 3.50 0.7106 0.9354
100 2.11 0.3774 0.8801
150 1.73 0.3690 0.8284
2 1.50 0.8267 0.8801
pH 4 1.80 1.8025 0.9784
6 2.11 0.3774 0.8801
Initial metal 10 3.53 0.2706 0.9301
concentration 50 2.11 0.3774 0.8801
(mg L−1 ) 100 1.64 0.7356 0.8664
Table 5. Bohart–Adams model parameters at different conditions using linear regression analysis.
KAB N0
Parameter R2
(L mg−1 min−1 ) × 10−5 (mg L−1 )
Flow rate 4 2.44 0.6023 0.6781
(mL min−1) 6 2.93 0.7181 0.5621
8 2.30 0.7503 0.7032
Bed height (mm) 50 2.25 0.9150 0.8164
100 2.44 0.6023 0.6781
150 1.83 0.5035 0.6132
2 3.10 0.7041 0.6789
pH 4 2.89 0.8278 0.8954
6 2.44 0.6023 0.6781
Initial metal 10 4.05 0.4037 0.8381
concentration 50 2.44 0.6023 0.6781
(mg L−1 ) 100 1.33 0.8980 0.6964
Although the Bohart–Adams model is widely utilized and valuable for conducting and
analyzing adsorption-column experiments, it is crucial to acknowledge that its applicability
is limited to certain experimental conditions [41,43]. The model’s correlation coefficient
falling below 0.96 indicates that it is not sufficient for fully capturing the adsorption
behavior of the column. Instead, it is exclusively suitable for depicting the initial portion of
the breakthrough curve [5].
Table 6. Yoon–Nelson model parameters at different conditions using linear regression analysis.
kYN Tcalc
Parameter R2
(mg−1 min−1 ) × 10−2 (min)
Flow rate 4 2.11 9.4382 0.8801
(mL min−1 ) 6 3.13 6.4445 0.8764
8 4.32 5.8982 0.9122
Bed height (mm) 5 3.50 8.8842 0.9354
10 2.11 9.4382 0.8801
15 1.73 13.8422 0.8284
2 1.50 20.6706 0.8801
pH 4 1.77 45.0641 0.9784
6 2.11 9.4382 0.8801
Initial metal 10 1.72 13.5244 0.9301
concentration 50 2.11 9.4382 0.8801
(mg L−1 ) 100 3.24 9.1965 0.8664
may be expressed using the subsequent formula, where the ‘lumped’ variables a and b are
defined in Table 5:
C 1
= (7)
CO 1 + exp(b − at)
Based on Equation (7), it can be concluded that the Thomas, Bohart–Adams, and Yoon–
Nelson models are fundamentally equal. The breakthrough curve predictions obtained
from Equation (7) depict the breakthrough curve that would be achieved using any of the
three previously mentioned models (Equations (5)–(7)). The three sets of parameters (kTh ,
qTh ; kBA , N0 ; and kYN , t) can be determined from constants ‘a’ and ‘b’ (Table 7) and are thus
interchangeable [56].
Table 7. Parameters of “a” and “b” of generic model (Equation (7)) formulated using variables of
different models.
The merits and limitations of the models utilized in this study were assessed and
summed up in Table 8 based on the analysis and relationship of the experimental data. The
results show that the three models were well-suited to describe the column data, especially
in instances of columns with higher bed heights, where a consistent and even depletion
process was observed [57]. Hence, these models can be effectively used to forecast the
performance of columns and aid in designing considerations and future enhancement
endeavors. The applicability of the three utilized models in this study was observed for
adsorption in distinct component systems. The utilization of the Thomas model offered
valuable insights into the dynamics of mass transfer between the adsorbent material and
metal solutions. This allowed for a better understanding of the driving forces behind these
processes under various conditions. The experimental data collected from the Pb2+ columns
showed a promising alignment with the theoretical predictions generated by the Thomas
and Yoon–Nelson models. This alignment indicated the presence of hindrances to mass
transfer within the columns. Each of the three models employed in this study necessitated
distinct parameters for their respective theoretical calculations.
Table 8. Merits and limitations of column models employed in this study in relation to PACC.
Merits Limitations
• Appropriate for sizeable bed
depth adsorbent of Pb2+ • Insufficient representation
Thomas model columns for Pb2+ columns with
• Best fitted for columns with shorter bed lengths
mass transfer resistance
• Require additional
parameters for the model
to be utilized
• Offered an estimation of the • Insufficiently described the
Bohart–Adams equilibrium concentration of the behaviors of the metal
adsorbate columns
• Only applicable to
adsorption processes
involving surface reactions
• Requires fewer parameters for
• Inadequate for Pb2+
computation
Yoon–Nelson model columns with a shallow
• The projected 50% breakthrough
bed depth of adsorbent
time was realistic
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 18 of 23
Among the three models utilized in this study, the Yoon–Nelson model stood out
for its simplicity, requiring fewer parameters and theoretical calculations. It provided
valuable information on the 50% breakthrough of the column, enabling the prediction of
the saturation period without requiring extensive experimental duration [58]. In contrast,
the widely used Bohart–Adams model has proven useful in predicting the sorption capacity
of adsorbents in various studies, particularly for the design of large-scale effluent treat-
ment systems. By analyzing experimental breakthrough data, the Bohart–Adams model
can estimate breakthrough time and maximum adsorption capacity, which are crucial
for efficient system design and operation [54]. However, this model imposes additional
parameters and computations to derive predicting data. It primarily focuses on adsorption
through surface reactions, the presence of sorption sites, and the starting portion of the
breakthrough curve [59]. In the case of removing Pb2+ using PACC, involving the inte-
gration of ion exchange and adsorption, the Bohart–Adams model is not an ideal fit for
accurately and comprehensively representing column behaviors and mechanisms in this
study. Although the employed models exhibited a good fit for certain column parameters,
certain parameters were not accurately captured, likely due to the presence of mass transfer
resistance and the intricate mechanisms involved in the removal process [59].
The findings suggest that enhanced adsorption efficiency is attained through increased
bed heights, reduced flow rates, and higher initial concentrations. Furthermore, Table 9
offers a concise overview of how various adsorbents perform under similar circumstances.
This investigation has affirmed that the adsorption capability of PACC is on par with, and
conceivably superior to, the capacities of alternative adsorbents noted in contemporary
scientific literature.
Table 9. Summary of capacity uptake of other adsorbents used for Pb2+ adsorption.
Figure 11.11.
Figure Fourier transform
Fourier infrared
transform (FTIR)
infrared spectra
(FTIR) spectraof of
polyurethane-activated carbon
polyurethane-activated composite
carbon composite
(PACC), PACC
(PACC), PACC after PbPb
after adsorption, and
adsorption, andPACC
PACCafter regeneration.
after regeneration.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, R.M.D.F.; Data curation, R.J.R.E., T.R.B.T. and A.A.L.
(Alona A. Lubguban); Formal analysis, R.G.D.J.; Funding acquisition, G.G.D., A.C.A. and A.A.L.
(Arnold A. Lubguban); Methodology, R.J.R.E. and T.R.B.T.; Resources, R.M.D.F.; Software, R.M.D.F.,
R.J.R.E. and T.R.B.T.; Supervision, R.M.M., H.P.B. and A.A.L. (Arnold A. Lubguban); Writing—review
and editing, R.F.A.J., R.Y.C., R.M.M., A.C.A., H.P.B. and A.A.L. (Arnold A. Lubguban). All authors
have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: The Department of Science and Technology—Accelerated Science and Technology Human
Resource Development Program provided support for this study as part of the primary author’s
scholarship program.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The datasets utilized and/or analyzed during the current study are
available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to express their gratitude for the financial assistance provided
by the Department of Science and Technology through the Niche Centers in the Region (NICER)—
R&D Center for Sustainable Polymers.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Zhao, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, D.; Li, J.; Zou, B.; Tao, Y.; Lei, L.; Qiao, F.; Huang, J. Assessment of residents’ total environmental exposure
to heavy metals in China. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16386. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Mohamed, M.H.; Udoetok, I.A.; Solgi, M.; Steiger, B.G.K.; Zhou, Z.; Wilson, L.D. Design of Sustainable Biomaterial Composite
Adsorbents for Point-of-Use Removal of Lead Ions from Water. Front. Water 2022, 4, 739492. [CrossRef]
3. Wang, Y.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, W.; Zhang, N.; Du, B.; Wei, Q. Electrochemical aptasensor based on gold
modified graphene nanocomposite with different morphologies for ultrasensitive detection of Pb2+ . Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019,
288, 325–331. [CrossRef]
4. Levallois, P.; Barn, P.; Valcke, M.; Gauvin, D.; Kosatsky, T. Public Health Consequences of Lead in Drinking Water. Curr. Environ.
Health Rep. 2018, 5, 255–262. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Basu, M.; Guha, A.K.; Ray, L. Adsorption of Lead on Lentil Husk in Fixed Bed Column Bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 283,
86–95. [CrossRef]
6. Renu, M.A.; Singh, K.; Upadhyaya, S.; Dohare, R. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using modified agricultural
adsorbents. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 10534–10538. [CrossRef]
7. Kuang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, S. Adsorption of Methylene Blue in Water onto Activated Carbon by Surfactant Modification. Water
2020, 12, 587. [CrossRef]
8. Maulina, S.; Iriansyah, M. Characteristics of activated carbon resulted from pyrolysis of the oil palm fronds powder. IOP Conf.
Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 309, 012072. [CrossRef]
9. Wang, B.; Lan, J.; Bo, C.; Gong, B.; Ou, J. Adsorption of heavy metal onto biomass-derived activated carbon: Review. RSC Adv.
2023, 13, 4275–4302. [CrossRef]
10. Lou, X.-Y.; Boada, R.; Simonelli, L.; Valiente, M. Enhanced arsenite removal by superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in-situ
synthesized on a commercial cube-shape sponge: Adsorption-oxidation mechanism. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 614, 460–467.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Hethnawi, A.; Manasrah, A.D.; Vitale, G.; Nassar, N.N. Fixed-bed column studies of total organic carbon removal from industrial
wastewater by use of diatomite decorated with polyethylenimine-functionalized pyroxene nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci.
2018, 513, 28–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Sawant, S.Y.; Pawar, R.R.; Lee, S.-M.; Cho, M.H. Binder-free production of 3D N-doped porous carbon cubes for efficient Pb2+
removal through batch and fixed bed adsorption. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 290–301. [CrossRef]
13. Kalaivani, S.S.; Muthukrishnaraj, A.; Sivanesan, S.; Ravikumar, L. Novel hyperbranched polyurethane resins for the removal of
heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2016, 104, 11–23. [CrossRef]
14. Prasad, P.S.; Gomathi, T.; Sudha, P.; Deepa, M.; Rambabu, K.; Banat, F. Biosilica/Silk Fibroin/Polyurethane biocomposite for toxic
heavy metals removal from aqueous streams. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 28, 102741. [CrossRef]
15. Carriço, C.S.; Fraga, T.; Pasa, V.M. Production and characterization of polyurethane foams from a simple mixture of castor oil,
crude glycerol and untreated lignin as bio-based polyols. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 85, 53–61. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 22 of 23
16. Kaikade, D.S.; Sabnis, A.S. Polyurethane foams from vegetable oil-based polyols: A review. Polym. Bull. 2022, 80, 2239–2261.
[CrossRef]
17. Dingcong, R.G.; Malaluan, R.M.; Alguno, A.C.; Estrada, D.J.E.; Lubguban, A.A.; Resurreccion, E.P.; Dumancas, G.G.; Al-Moameri,
H.H.; Lubguban, A.A. A novel reaction mechanism for the synthesis of coconut oil-derived biopolyol for rigid poly(urethane-urea)
hybrid foam application. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 1985–1994. [CrossRef]
18. De Franco, M.A.E.; de Carvalho, C.B.; Bonetto, M.M.; de Pelegrini Soares, R.; Féris, L.A. Removal of amoxicillin from water
by adsorption onto activated carbon in batch process and fixed bed column: Kinetics, isotherms, experimental design and
breakthrough curves modelling. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 947–956. [CrossRef]
19. Bo, S.; Luo, J.; An, Q.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, H.; Cai, W.; Zhai, S.; Li, Z. Efficiently selective adsorption of Pb(II) with functionalized
alginate-based adsorbent in batch/column systems: Mechanism and application simulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 250, 119585.
[CrossRef]
20. Fouda-Mbanga, B.; Prabakaran, E.; Pillay, K. Synthesis and characterization of CDs/Al2 O3 nanofibers nanocomposite for Pb2+
ions adsorption and reuse for latent fingerprint detection. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 6762–6781. [CrossRef]
21. Recepoğlu, Y.K.; Kabay, N.; Ipek, I.Y.; Arda, M.; Yüksel, M.; Yoshizuka, K.; Nishihama, S. Packed bed column dynamic study
for boron removal from geothermal brine by a chelating fiber and breakthrough curve analysis by using mathematical models.
Desalination 2018, 437, 1–6. [CrossRef]
22. De Franco, M.A.E.; de Carvalho, C.B.; Bonetto, M.M.; de Pelegrini Soares, R.; Féris, L.A. Diclofenac removal from water by
adsorption using activated carbon in batch mode and fixed-bed column: Isotherms, thermodynamic study and breakthrough
curves modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 145–154. [CrossRef]
23. Bulgariu, D.; Bulgariu, L. Sorption of Pb(II) onto a mixture of algae waste biomass and anion exchanger resin in a packed-bed
column. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129, 374–380. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Thomas, H.C. chromatography: A problem in kinetics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1948, 49, 161–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Bohart, G.S.; Adams, E.Q. Some aspects of the behavior of charcoal with respect to chlorine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1920, 42, 523–544.
[CrossRef]
26. Hoang, M.T.; Pham, T.D.; Nguyen, V.T.; Nguyen, M.K.; Pham, T.T.; Van der Bruggen, B. Removal and recovery of lead from
wastewater using an integrated system of adsorption and crystallization. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 1204–1216. [CrossRef]
27. Yoon, Y.H.; Nelson, J.H. Application of Gas Adsorption Kinetics I. A Theoretical Model for Respirator Cartridge Service Life. Am.
Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1984, 45, 509–516. [CrossRef]
28. Keshavarz, A.; Zilouei, H.; Abdolmaleki, A.; Asadinezhad, A.; Nikkhah, A.A. Impregnation of polyurethane foam with activated
carbon for enhancing oil removal from water. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 699–710. [CrossRef]
29. Li, B.; Zhao, G.; Wang, G.; Zhang, L.; Gong, J.; Shi, Z. Biodegradable PLA/PBS open-cell foam fabricated by supercritical CO2
foaming for selective oil-adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 257, 117949. [CrossRef]
30. Qu, J.; Song, T.; Liang, J.; Bai, X.; Li, Y.; Wei, Y.; Huang, S.; Dong, L.; Jin, Y. Adsorption of lead (II) from aqueous solution by
modified Auricularia matrix waste: A fixed-bed column study. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 722–729. [CrossRef]
31. Wang, S.; Jin, C.; Qian, W. Bi2 O3 with activated carbon composite as a supercapacitor electrode. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 615, 12–17.
[CrossRef]
32. Vuković, G.D.; Marinković, A.D.; Škapin, S.D.; Ristić, M.Ð.; Aleksić, R.; Perić-Grujić, A.A.; Uskoković, P.S. Removal of lead from
water by amino modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 855–865. [CrossRef]
33. Hassan, A.; Abdel-Mohsen, A.; Elhadidy, H. Adsorption of arsenic by activated carbon, calcium alginate and their composite
beads. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 68, 125–130. [CrossRef]
34. Wang, H.; Wang, Q.-S.; He, J.-J.; Mao, Z.-L.; Sun, J.-H. Study on the Pyrolytic Behaviors and Kinetics of Rigid Polyurethane Foams.
Procedia Eng. 2013, 52, 377–385. [CrossRef]
35. Xiong, L.W.; Badri, K.H. Preparation of polyurethane composites with activated carbon black as the reinforcing filler. J. Polym. Sci.
Technol. 2018, 3, 11–18.
36. Mathivanan, J.; Liu, H.; Gan, J.; Chandrasekaran, A.R.; Sheng, J. Fluorescent Aptaswitch for Detection of Lead Ions. ACS Appl. Bio
Mater. 2022, 5, 5089–5093. [CrossRef]
37. Eichhorn, S.J.; Sampson, W.W. Relationships between specific surface area and pore size in electrospun polymer fibre networks. J.
R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7, 641–649. [CrossRef]
38. Nam, G.; Choi, S.; Byun, H.; Rhym, Y.-M.; Shim, S.E. Preparation of macroporous carbon foams using a polyurethane foam
template replica method without curing step. Macromol. Res. 2013, 21, 958–964. [CrossRef]
39. El Malti, W.; Hamieh, M.; Noaman, A.; El-Dine, R.N.; Hijazi, A.; Al-Khatib, W. Polyurethane Loaded with Vegetable Activated
Carbon for Heavy Metals Removal from Water. J. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 22, 99–110. [CrossRef]
40. Udayakumar, M.; El Mrabate, B.; Koós, T.; Szemmelveisz, K.; Kristály, F.; Leskó, M.; Filep, A.; Géber, R.; Schabikowski, M.; Baumli,
P.; et al. Synthesis of activated carbon foams with high specific surface area using polyurethane elastomer templates for effective
removal of methylene blue. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103214. [CrossRef]
41. Mobasherpour, I.; Salahi, E.; Asjodi, A. Research on the Batch and Fixed-Bed Column Performance of Red Mud Adsorbents for
Lead Removal. Can. Chem. Trans. 2014, 2, 83–96. [CrossRef]
42. Albadarin, A.B.; Mangwandi, C.; Al-Muhtaseb, A.H.; Walker, G.M.; Allen, S.J.; Ahmad, M.N. Modelling and Fixed Bed Column
Adsorption of Cr(VI) onto Orthophosphoric Acid-activated Lignin. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2012, 20, 469–477. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 14344 23 of 23
43. Makrigianni, V.; Giannakas, A.; Hela, D.; Papadaki, M.; Konstantinou, I. Adsorption of methylene blue dye by pyrolytic tire char
in fixed-bed column. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 65, 346–358. [CrossRef]
44. Gong, J.-L.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Jiang, Y.; Zeng, G.-M.; Cui, Z.-H.; Liu, K.; Deng, C.-H.; Niu, Q.-Y.; Deng, J.-H.; Huan, S.-Y. Continuous
adsorption of Pb(II) and methylene blue by engineered graphite oxide coated sand in fixed-bed column. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 330,
148–157. [CrossRef]
45. Ahmad, A.A.; Hameed, B.H. Fixed-bed adsorption of reactive azo dye onto granular activated carbon prepared from waste. J.
Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 298–303. [CrossRef]
46. Boucherdoud, A.; Kherroub, D.E.; Bestani, B.; Benderdouche, N.; Douinat, O. Fixed-bed adsorption dynamics of methylene blue
from aqueous solution using alginate-activated carbon composites adsorbents. Alger. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. Month Ed. 2022, 8.
47. Dotto, G.; dos Santos, J.N.; Rosa, R.; Pinto, L.; Pavan, F.; Lima, E. Fixed bed adsorption of Methylene Blue by ultrasonic surface
modified chitin supported on sand. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, 100, 302–310. [CrossRef]
48. Li, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Xie, L. Fixed-bed column adsorption of arsenic(v) by porous composite of
magnetite/hematite/carbon with eucalyptus wood microstructure. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2018, 26, 38–56. [CrossRef]
49. El Mouhri, G.; Merzouki, M.; Belhassan, H.; Miyah, Y.; Amakdouf, H.; Elmountassir, R.; Lahrichi, A. Continuous Adsorption
Modeling and Fixed Bed Column Studies: Adsorption of Tannery Wastewater Pollutants Using Beach Sand. J. Chem. 2020, 2020,
1–9. [CrossRef]
50. Gomaa, H.; Shenashen, M.A.; Yamaguchi, H.; Alamoudi, A.S.; Abdelmottaleb, M.; Cheira, M.F.; El-Naser, T.A.S.; El-Safty, S.A.
Highly-efficient removal of AsV, Pb2+ , Fe3+ , and Al3+ pollutants from water using hierarchical, microscopic TiO2 and TiOF2
adsorbents through batch and fixed-bed columnar techniques. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 182, 910–925. [CrossRef]
51. Khan, M.R.; Hegde, R.A.; Shabiimam, M.A. Adsorption of Lead by Bentonite Clay. Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag. 2017, 5, 5800–5804.
[CrossRef]
52. Pap, S.; Radonić, J.; Trifunović, S.; Adamović, D.; Mihajlović, I.; Miloradov, M.V.; Sekulić, M.T. Evaluation of the adsorption
potential of eco-friendly activated carbon prepared from cherry kernels for the removal of Pb2+ , Cd2+ and Ni2+ from aqueous
wastes. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 184, 297–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53. Choudhary, V.; Patel, M.; Pittman, C.U., Jr.; Mohan, D. Batch and Continuous Fixed-Bed Lead Removal Using Himalayan Pine
Needle Biochar: Isotherm and Kinetic Studies. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 16366–16378. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Lim, A.P.; Aris, A.Z. Continuous fixed-bed column study and adsorption modeling: Removal of cadmium (II) and lead (II) ions in
aqueous solution by dead calcareous skeletons. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 87, 50–61. [CrossRef]
55. Liu, Y.; Gao, Q.; Pu, S.; Wang, H.; Xia, K.; Han, B.; Zhou, C. Carboxyl-functionalized lotus seedpod: A highly efficient and reusable
agricultural waste-based adsorbent for removal of toxic Pb2+ ions from aqueous solution. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng.
Asp. 2019, 568, 391–401. [CrossRef]
56. Chatterjee, S.; Mondal, S.; De, S. Design and scaling up of fixed bed adsorption columns for lead removal by treated laterite. J.
Clean. Prod. 2018, 177, 760–774. [CrossRef]
57. Futalan, C.M.; Wan, M.-W. Fixed-Bed Adsorption of Lead from Aqueous Solution Using Chitosan-Coated Bentonite. Int. J.
Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2597. [CrossRef]
58. Chu, K.H. Breakthrough curve analysis by simplistic models of fixed bed adsorption: In defense of the century-old Bohart-Adams
model. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122513. [CrossRef]
59. Sreenivas, K.; Inarkar, M.; Gokhale, S.; Lele, S. Re-utilization of ash gourd (Benincasa hispida) peel waste for chromium (VI)
biosorption: Equilibrium and column studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 455–462. [CrossRef]
60. Dorado, A.D.; Gamisans, X.; Valderrama, C.; Solé, M.; Lao, C. Cr(III) removal from aqueous solutions: A straightforward model
approaching of the adsorption in a fixed-bed column. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2014, 49, 179–186. [CrossRef]
61. Anwar, J.; Shafique, U.; Zaman, W.U.; Salman, M.; Dar, A.; Anwar, S. Removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from water by adsorption on
peels of banana. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1752–1755. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. Mittal, H.; Maity, A.; Ray, S.S. The Adsorption of Pb2+ and Cu2+ onto Gum Ghatti-Grafted Poly(acrylamide-co-acrylonitrile)
Biodegradable Hydrogel: Isotherms and Kinetic Models. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 2026–2039. [CrossRef]
63. Ma, J.; Xia, M.; Zhu, S.; Wang, F. A new alendronate doped HAP nanomaterial for Pb2+ , Cu2+ and Cd2+ effect absorption. J.
Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 123143. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Iqbal, M.; Saeed, A.; Zafar, S.I. FTIR spectrophotometry, kinetics and adsorption isotherms modeling, ion exchange, and EDX
analysis for understanding the mechanism of Cd2+ and Pb2+ removal by mango peel waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 161–171.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Purvis, B.; Mao, Y.; Robinson, D. Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 681–695.
[CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.