A Look Into Community Language Learning
A Look Into Community Language Learning
(CLL)
POSTED ON JANUARY 20, 2022 BY SANAKO BLOG
MORE ABOUT US
English and Foreign language teaching has always been enriched by the
influences of different disciplines and learning theories, from linguistics to
psychology. One of the most interesting teaching methods developed from the
application of psychological insights is Community Language Learning (in short,
CLL). What makes this language teaching approach so interesting is the focus
on learner agency.
As a part of Sanako’s mission to help language teachers to improve their teaching
outcomes and teaching approaches, we continuously publish content and information
on different language teaching methods and teaching tips. This insightful blog post
therefore explores the Community Language Learning methodology and how language
teachers could apply it into their lessons.
Transferred to the pedagogical-linguistic level, the method suggests that the optimal
relationship to be established between teacher and pupil is analogous to that between
therapist and client (this is also referred as counselling-learning or counselling-
approach). The client in the psychotherapeutic setting is thus equated with the language
learner struggling with the difficulties of learning a second language.
Just as the patient is the centre around which the psychotherapeutic process revolves,
so in the CLL approach, the student is the pivot around which the choice and
development of the teaching activities are structured. This means that in the CLL
approach, it is the students who choose the type of activity to be carried out in the
language classroom. CLL is therefore a truly learner-centered and humanistic approach
to teaching languages
The teacher, in the equivalent role of counsellor, has a supportive function, encouraging
group work, and communication between learners. In fulfilling this role of mediator
between students and the ultimate goal of language learning, the teacher must ensure
that the development of language skills takes place within a “supportive community”.
In order for the classroom to truly function as a community, it is necessary for the
teacher’s work to also take into account the emotional and psychological factors of
language learning process. As highlighted in a study (Brown & Lee, 2015) of the CLL
method, students and teacher must work together to create an environment in which
target language practice can take place without Foreign language speaking anxiety.
CLL is therefore a language teaching method that aims to develop both the language
skills and the emotional and social skills of learners. This characteristic, which is the
CLL’s main strength, means on the other hand that this approach can only work in
certain contexts. In other words, CLL is not a suitable method for all language classes
and for all age levels*.
*Read also our other article where we discuss how to teach languages to different age levels.
As it has been noted, CLL is a particularly suitable approach for classes of adult
learners which tends to be of a good level of linguistic preparation. Indeed, for the CLL
community to function, it is necessary for students to be able to operate autonomously
to a certain degree.
One potential disadvantage of the CLL approach is that it can be challenging to create
suitable lesson plans for it, especially for teachers who are more accustomed to
traditional, structured teaching methods. CLL is highly responsive to the needs and
interests of the learners. The lesson content and direction often emerge from the
students’ questions, concerns, and topics they wish to discuss. This flexibility can make
it difficult to pre-plan detailed lessons in advance.
In conclusion, CLL is a suitable method for language teachers who are looking for a
whole-person learning approach, in which the learner develops not only language skills
but also emotional competencies. On the other hand, it is a method that, in order to
work best, should only be applied in contexts where students prove to be able to
interact cooperatively and autonomous enough to design the content of the lessons.