Color Science and Shade Selection
Color Science and Shade Selection
Shade Selection in
Operative Dentistry
123
Color Science and Shade Selection
in Operative Dentistry
Dayane Oliveira
Editor
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher,
whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation,
reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any
other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation,
computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in
this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor
the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material
contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains
neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
This book aims to provide information and guidance on color selection and
color matching in Dentistry.
Generally speaking, color science has always been an essential and trend-
ing topic in Dentistry but never fully explored. Color science in Dentistry is
usually briefly explored in book chapters. This book is looking forward to
fully exploring all theories and clinical guidance to fulfill clinical success.
This book is addressed to all groups from undergraduate to postgraduate
students, clinicians, and researchers. The content embraces to attend all
groups but written in a way all groups can understand. The topics include the
basic color science concepts till bleaching, color selection, color matching
using schematic drawings, and the many different restorative techniques
using resin composites and stratifications, and much more.
I appreciate all authors for their contribution to this book, their effort, and
their dedication that made it all possible. It was a pleasure to collaborate with
such an amazing group. Thank you so much for making this book come true!
v
Contents
vii
Color Science
1
Dayane Oliveira and Mateus Garcia Rocha
1.1 Color Definition where the surrounding colors trick the human
brain into an incorrect interpretation of color [2].
“Color is defined as the property of producing a Indeed, the visual perception of different col-
visual perception as a result of the way an object ors is a subjective process whereby the brain
reflects or emits light.” Although it seems simple, responds to the stimuli that are produced by
color is best described as an abstract science in color-sensitive cones localized in the human ret-
which it appears to be highly subjective. ina. However, it proves the importance of color
In 2005, neuroscientists from University of education in Dentistry [3].
Rochester had found that the number of color-
sensitive cells in the human retina differs among
people by up to 40 times; yet people appear to 1.2 Color and Its Dimensions
perceive colors the same way. These findings
indicated that visual perception of color is con- Color can be specified based on three color
trolled much more by the human brain than the appearance parameters, also known as the three
eyes [1]. color dimensions: hue, value (or lightness), and
A practical example of the influence of the Chroma (Fig. 1.2).
human brain on visual perception is shown in
Fig. 1.1. Observing the square, how many shades
do you see? If you see two different shades of 1.2.1 Hue
gray, cover the line blocking the darker and
lighter shading across the middle, and your brain Hue is defined as the visual perception of the
will begin to realize that the cube actually has stimuli of a wavelength. As illustrated in Fig. 1.3,
only one shade. This is a color illusion from Tom the main pure hues are red, blue, and yellow. The
Cornsweet, who is best known for his work in main pure hues are also called primary colors.
visual perception. Color illusions are images However, the mixture of pure hues can generate
different visual perception stimuli, also called
secondary colors. For example, the mixture of
blue (primary color) and yellow (primary color)
D. Oliveira · M. G. Rocha (*)
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College generates the visual perception of green (second-
of Dentistry, University of Florida, ary color). The mixture of a primary color and a
Gainesville, FL, USA secondary color can also generate a different
e-mail: [email protected]; visual perception stimulus, called a tertiary color.
[email protected]
Chroma is defined as the purity, intensity, or satu- Color is not a property of light, but the visual per-
ration of a color. Thus, a lower Chroma would ception of light by an observer. In order for the
indicate less intensity of the color, as in pastel color to be perceived, three elements must be
colors. In contrast, a higher Chroma is related to simultaneously present: illumination, an object,
more vivid color. and an observer.
1.3.2 Object
through the object. And in the end, how an the material can create dichroism, in which the
observer perceives an object’s color depends on material appears blue from the front side (opales-
which wavelengths are reflected by this object. cence), but yellowish-red shines through the back-
side (counter-opalescence) (Fig. 1.7). This
1.3.2.2 Opalescence phenomenon occurs due to a specific type of light
and Counter-Opalescence scattering known as the Tyndall effect. Under the
As previously mentioned, objects can be transpar- Tyndall effect, the longer-wavelength light, yel-
ent, translucent, or opaque according to the degree low-red, is more transmitted while the shorter-
of light that is transmitted rather than absorbed or wavelength light, blue, is more reflected.
reflected (as illustrated in Fig. 1.4). In highly trans- Enamel is a highly translucent tissue respon-
lucent materials, the light that is scattered through sible for the opalescence of the incisal halo. This
1 Color Science 5
Fig. 1.6 Light absorption, reflection and transmission, and color perception
effect is not perceptible in the cervical and differently at different angles. This phenomenon
medium thirds of the teeth due to the presence of is called goniochromism [7].
dentin in between, which is highly opaque [5, 6].
However, in the incisal third, it is possible to 1.3.2.3 Fluorescence
observe an opalescent halo that follows the inci- On the other side, the dentin is responsible for
sal outline of the mamelon of dentin. Specific another natural effect in the tooth: fluorescence.
composites called “translucent” or “opalescent” The fluorescence is the emission of a visible
can be used to reproduce this effect. wavelength after absorption of radiation in the
Also, the translucent multilayering character- ultraviolet region of the spectrum, which is invis-
istic of the teeth can make its color be perceived ible to the human eye. Then, when exposed to
6 D. Oliveira and M. G. Rocha
ultraviolet light, the fluorescence of dentin gives Despite called “blue,” “green,” and “red” cone
a distinct color that glows. Thus, if the restorative cells, each type of cell does not sense only one
material did not have this property, the difference color but a broad range of wavelengths in varying
between the natural teeth and the restorative degrees of sensitivity. Because of this, different
material would be perceived when exposed to specific selective cones can be stimulated by sim-
ultraviolet light (Fig. 1.8). However, nowadays, ilar wavelength spectra but in different levels.
all dental composites have fluorescence proper- Thus, when the cone cells are exposed to a cer-
ties due to the addition of rare earths to the tain wavelength spectrum, the most sensitive
composition. cone cell for this specific wavelength spectrum is
stimulated first.
1.3.3.5 Age
The sensitivity of retinal cells declines with age,
causing different shades of color to be less notice-
Fig. 1.10 Bleaching shade guide shades tabs with satura- able [10]. At the same time, certain neural path-
tion in a crescent scale ways of the brain compensate it, so color
perception remains constant over some time [11].
shades to describe color than men. But women Because of this, color vision abnormalities are
proved slightly better at detecting tiny differ- very uncommon in people younger than 70.
ences between shades that look the same to men. However, as there is no treatment for this age-
The scientists believe the answer lies in the dif- related loss of color perception, in mid-70s, den-
ferences in men’s and women’s hormones that tists should be aware of this limitation.
can alter development in the visual cortex. In
contrast, children are more likely to sort the col- 1.3.3.6 Phenomena That Affect Color
ors more randomly. However, the reason is prob- Perception
ably due to the smaller exposure to color groups –– Metamerism
and general education of color [8, 9]. As previously explained, when the light hits
an object, the different wavelengths in it can
1.3.3.4 Expertise be absorbed, transmitted, or reflected. The
As mentioned in the previous topic, exposure to reflected wavelengths will be responsible for
color groups and general education of color the color perception of the object (as illus-
8 D. Oliveira and M. G. Rocha
trated in Fig. 1.6). However, different light than the original color of the teeth. At lower
sources can emit different wavelengths, and intensities, however, the color perception
the color of the object can look different under shifts more toward the red/green axis.
different illumination. –– Stiles–Crawford Effect
In some cases, the color of two different The Stiles–Crawford effect is the phenome-
colored objects can match under one set of non where light reaching the eye near the edge
illumination but fail to match under a different of the pupil produces a lower photoreceptor
set (Fig. 1.11). This phenomenon is known as response compared to light of similar intensity
the metamerism effect [12–14]. It shows the reaching the eye near the center of the pupil.
importance of illumination during color selec- This phenomenon is so vital in Dentistry
tion in Dentistry [15]. because teeth color is multichromatic, and
–– Bezold–Brucke effect depending on the angle that the color is
Hue perception can change as light intensity observed, color perception can vary [18].
varies. This phenomenon is known as the –– Aubert or Abney Effect
Bezold–Brucke shift [16, 17]. As the light The Aubert or Abney effect is also known as
intensity increases, the color perception shifts the purity-on-hue effect. This effect described
more toward blue or yellow, depending on the the perceived hue shift that occurs when white
original color of the object. Then, if the object light is added to a monochromatic light source.
is yellow, it tends to look more saturated than The addition of white light causes a desatura-
it really is (Fig. 1.12). It can influence the tion of the monochromatic light, as perceived
color selection to a more saturated color rather by the human eye. For this reason, this hue
Fig. 2.1 Natural tooth structures: enamel and dentin layers, and the opalescence and counter-opalescence phenomena
in the tooth structure
dentin that penetrate and connect both tissues. dehydration occurs, then translucency decreases
This junction gives the natural appearance of the [3]. For this reason, it is extremely important to
tooth color, which depends on the hue of the den- evaluate the color of the tooth when hydrated.
tin and the translucency of the enamel [3]. When performing a restoration under isolation,
the tooth dehydrates and tends to look lighter and
opaquer, causing a mismatch in color. For this
2.1.2 Optical Properties reason, it is recommended to wait for the tooth to
hydrate to check the final color appearance.
There are three optical properties that directly
influence on the color of the tooth structure: 2.1.2.2 Fluorescence
translucency, fluorescence, and opalescence. The fluorescence is the emission of a visible
wavelength after absorption of radiation in the
2.1.2.1 Translucency ultraviolet region of the spectrum, which is invis-
Translucency is described as the ability to allow ible to the human eye. Then, when exposed to
an underlying background to show through. As ultraviolet light, the fluorescence of dentin gives
previously described, the enamel has a higher a distinct color that glows. Of course, such prop-
translucency than the dentin [4]. The materials erty is only observed under ultraviolet illumina-
can be considered transparent, translucent, or tion. However, if the restorative material does not
opaque according to the degree of light that is have this property, a difference in appearance
transmitted rather than absorbed or reflected. For between the natural teeth and the restorative
further details, consult Chap. 1. material would be perceived when the tooth is
The translucency of human dental enamel has exposed to ultraviolet light (as previously illus-
been determined by total transmittance at wave- trated in Chap. 1, Fig. 1.8).
lengths from 400 to 700 nm. Total transmission In natural teeth, fluorescence occurs mainly in
of light through human dental enamel increases the dentin because of the greater amount of organic
with increasing wavelength. Human tooth enamel material. However, it is important to mention that
is more translucent at higher wavelengths. the enamel is also fluorescent, although it presents
Translucency is influenced by many factors, a smaller fluorescence index than dentin due to the
thickness (of enamel and dentin), the surface tex- lower amount of organic material in its composi-
ture, and the hydration of the enamel prisms; if tion. Additionally, in many cases, the enamel pres-
2 Natural Tooth X Composites Biomimetics 15
a b
Fig. 2.2 Dental monomers used in the composition of resin composites: (a) BisGMA and (b) TEGDMA
ents higher fluorescence than several of the resin 2.2 Optical Properties
composites available on the market [5]. of the Resin Composites
a b
Fig. 2.3 Dental filler particles used in the composition of resin composites: (a) silica and (b) glass
a b
c d
Fig. 2.4 Dental photoinitiators: (a) camphorquinone; (b) BAPO; (c) TPO; (d) ivocerin
2.2.1.2 Fillers turers can also use different filler particle sizes to
The inorganic portion of the resin composites, on adjust this variable. However, it is known that
the other hand, consists of particles of quartz better polishing, lower surface roughness, and
(SiO2), silica (SiO2), zirconia (ZrO2), barium alu- higher gloss retention are achieved with smaller
minosilicate (BaO·Al2O3·2SiO2), or a combina- particles [8–10]. The reason is that when white
tion of these particles [6]. All these filler particles light shines on any solid, some of the light is
are whitish powders (Fig. 2.4). The different par- directly reflected from the surface and remains
ticles or their combination can be used according white. However, most of it is absorbed and trans-
to the type of monomers used in the formulation mitted, reflecting only a few wavelengths giving
of the resin composite. The reason for this is the perception of the color of the object. As a
because all different monomers and filler parti- result, an extremely rough surface appears lighter
cles have different refractive indexes. than a smooth surface of the same material. The
As previously explained in Chap. 1, the refrac- reason is that most of the white light will be
tive index is the ratio of the speed of light in the directly reflected from the surface. This problem
vacuum to its speed in a specific medium. Higher is associated with unpolished composite restora-
the difference between the refractive indexes of tions that appear lighter and less chromatic
the two mediums, the higher the light reflection. (grayer) before polishing [5].
Thus, the type and amount of these components
can affect the way the light is reflected, absorbed, 2.2.1.3 Coupling Agent
or transmitted [7], thus affecting its color percep- Coupling agents are meant to link dissimilar
tion. It is important to mention that the manufac- materials. As previously described, the resin com-
2 Natural Tooth X Composites Biomimetics 17
posites are composed of an organic portion, the tor, the camphorquinone (CQ). However, CQ is a
monomers, and an inorganic portion, the fillers. yellowed-colored powder (Fig. 2.5a) that can
However, organic and inorganic molecules do not directly interfere with the color of the resin com-
have any interaction or adhesion in between each posite, especially regarding lighter and more
other. For this reason, an organosilane is used as atranslucent colors. For this reason, some manu-
coupling agent in the composition of resin com- facturers use alternative photoinitiators, such as
posites [6]. The organosilane contains an organic the bisalkyl phosphine oxide (BAPO) (Fig. 2.5b)
portion in one of its ends which bonds to the and the monoalkyl phosphine oxide (TPO)
monomers. While, on the other end, the organosi- (Fig. 2.5c) that are whited-colored powders [10].
lane has a silane that bonds to the hydroxyl groups It is worthwhile to mention that Ivocerin is
of the filler. Similar to the monomers, the slightly less yellow than CQ, but still, a yellowed-
organosilanes are colorless liquids. The organosi- colored powder (Fig. 2.5d) that can also interfere
lane liquid is pre-applied to the surface of the with the color of the resin composite [10].
filler particles before mixed with the monomers. These colorful photoinitiators also interfere
with the color matching between the resin com-
2.2.1.4 Photoinitiators posite and the tooth. After absorbing its corre-
The photoinitiator is the component added to the sponding wavelength, it reacts and is consumed.
material that makes it light-curable. The photo- After its consumption, the material becomes less
initiator is a molecule that when absorbs light, yellow. For this reason, it is recommended to
generating free radicals that initiate the polymer- light-cure small increments of different shades of
ization process. Most composites are light- the resin composite on top of the tooth to better
activated within the blue wavelength spectrum select color. This technique will be further
(420–495 nm) using a diketone as a photoinitia- explored and explained in Chap. 3.
2.2.1.5 Pigments Chap. 1). Even different natural teeth might have
The pigment is the component added to the mate- different fluorescence intensities due to differ-
rial to characterize its final color [6]. As previ- ences in dentin and enamel composition and
ously explained, all the resin composite thicknesses [18, 19]. Still, some brands have a
components have different colors that can inter- more similar fluorescence effect to most natural
fere with the final color appearance of the mate- teeth than others [20].
rial. For this reason, different pigments can be
added accordingly to produce the different shades 2.2.2.3 Opalescence
usually needed in Dentistry. The most common and Counter-Opalescence
pigments used in dental resin composites are iron In highly translucent materials, the light that is
oxides (red or yellow) and titanium dioxides scattered through the material can create dichro-
(white). ism, in which the material appears blue from the
front side (opalescence), but yellowish-red shines
through the backside (counter-opalescence). The
2.2.2 Optical Properties natural enamel is a highly translucent tissue
responsible for the opalescence of the incisal
2.2.2.1 Translucency halo. The composites described before as translu-
As previously explained, the dentin and the cent or incisal can be used to reproduce this
enamel have different translucencies. The enamel effect. For this reason, some manufacturers also
is more translucent, while the dentin is opaquer. call this type of resin composite opalescent.
Thus, mimicking these different optical proper-
ties requires different types of resin composites
[11, 12]. Most manufacturers have at least two References
types of translucencies for their resin composites,
conveniently named dentin (opaquer) and enamel 1. Sulieman MAM. An overview of tooth- bleaching
techniques: chemistry, safety and efficacy.
(more translucent) shades. Other manufacturers Periodontology. 2000;48(1):148–96.
also have a mid- translucency material shade, 2. Ferraris F, Diamantopoulou S, Acunzo R, Alcidi
named as body, which is more translucent than R. Influence of enamel composite thickness on value,
the dentin but definitely much opaquer than the chroma and translucency of a high and a nonhigh
refractive index resin composite. Int J Esthet Dent.
enamel shades. A few manufacturers also have a 2014;9(3):382–401.
transparent shade, also sometimes convenient 3. Brodbelt RH, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL, Frazer-Dib JG, Yu
named incisal. R. Translucency of human dental enamel. J Dent Res.
The techniques applied with the different 1981;60(10):1749–53.
4. Spitzer D, Bosch JT. The absorption and scattering
types of resin composites are further described of light in bovine and human dental enamel. Calcif
and illustrated in Chap. 7. Depending on the Tissue Res. 1975;17(2):129–37.
tooth’s characteristics to be restored, a single or 5. Baratieri LN, Araujo E, Monteiro S Jr. Color in natural
multiple types of resin composites are necessary teeth and direct resin composite restorations: essential
aspects. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2007;2(2):172–86.
to achieve perfect biomimetics [13–17]. 6. Craig RG, Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig’s restor-
ative dental materials. Br Dent J. 2013;213(2):90.
2.2.2.2 Fluorescence 7. Shortall AC, Palim WM, Burtscher P. Refractive index
As previously mentioned, the dentin and the mismatch and monomer reactivity influence compos-
ite curing depth. J Dent Res. 2008;87(1):84–8.
enamel have a natural fluorescent effect on the 8. Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, Mazur RF,
tooth. In the composition of resin composites, Roeder L. The effect of different polishing systems on
rare earths are added to reproduce this effect surface roughness and gloss of various resin compos-
artificially. However, although, nowadays, all
ites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19:214–24. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00104.x.
resin composites have fluorescence properties, 9. O'Neill C, Kreplak L, Rueggeberg FA, Labrie D,
their intensities can vary depending on the con- Shimokawa CAK, Price RB. Effect of tooth brush-
centration of the rare earths added (see Fig. 1.8, ing on gloss retention and surface roughness of five
2 Natural Tooth X Composites Biomimetics 19
bulk-fill resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 15. Ardu S, Krejci I. Biomimetic direct composite strati-
2018;30:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12350. fication technique for the restoration of anterior teeth.
10. De Oliveira DC, Rocha MG, Gattia A, Correr (Erratum in: Quintessence Int. 2006 May;37(5):408).
AB, Ferracane JL, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of differ- Quintessence Int. 2006;37(3):167–74.
ent photoinitiators and reducing agents on cure 16. Dietschi D, Ardu S, Krejci I. A new shading concept
efficiency and color stability of resin-based com- based on natural tooth color applied to direct compos-
posites using different LED wavelengths. J Dent. ite restorations. Quintessence Int. 2006;37(2):91–102.
2015;43(12):1565–72. 17. Fahl N Jr. Achieving ultimate anterior esthetics with a
11. Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira OB new microhybrid composite. Compend Contin Educ
Jr. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency Dent Suppl. 2000;26:4–13.
and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 18. Pop-Ciutrila IS, Ghinea R, del Perez Gomez MM,
2011;23(2):73–87. Colosi HA, Dudea D, Badea M. Dentin scatter-
12. Maia R, De Oliveira DC, D’Antonio T, Qian F, Skiff ing, absorption, transmittance and light reflectiv-
F. Double-layer build-up technique: laser evaluation ity in human incisors, canines and molars. J Dent.
of light propagation in dental substrates and dental 2015;43(9):1116–24.
composites. Int J Esthet Dent. 2018;13(4):1–14. 19. Pop-Ciutrila IS, Ghinea R, Colosi HA, Dudea
13. Fahl N Jr. Single-shaded direct anterior composite res- D. Dentin translucency and color evaluation in
torations: a simplified technique for enhanced results. human incisors, canines, and molars. J Prosthet Dent.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(2):150–4. 2016;115(4):475–81.
14. Dietschi D. Free-hand bonding in the esthetic treat- 20. Chirdon WM, O’Brien WJ, Robertson
ment of anterior teeth: creating the illusion. J Esthet RE. Mechanisms of goniochromism relevant to
Dent. 1997;9(4):156–64. restorative dentistry. Dent Mater. 2009;25(6):802–9.
Color Selection in Operative
Dentistry
3
Vinícius Salgado and Dayane Oliveira
3.1 Illumination the same object can have its color distorted when
exposed to light sources with different color
As previously explained in Chap. 1, different temperatures.
light sources contain different wavelengths. This While low light intensity can affect hue per-
means that the color of the same object can be ception, the high light intensity can cause glare
perceived differently under different and result in fatigue to the eyes. In Dentistry, the
illuminations. recommended standard for color selection is a
People are usually exposed to light sources color temperature of 5500 K, which corresponds
during their routine: daylight, shade or cloudy to the ideal natural daylight. However, natural
sky, fluorescent light, incandescent light, etc. light conditions vary from 3000 to 8000 K
These different light sources have different color depending on the time (sunrise/sunshine) and the
temperatures. The color temperature is related to weather (sunny/cloudy). A practical way to have
the color appearance of the light emitted by the more color matching success regardless of the
light source. natural conditions is to use a standardizing day-
light lamp in the dental office. However, portable
light-correcting devices are also available to
3.1.1 Color Temperature assist chairside shade matching.
Fig. 3.2 Portable light-correcting devices: Smile Lite (Styleitaliano) and Rite Lite (Addent)
order: B1, A1, B2, D2, A2, C1, C2, D4, A3, D3, and 4 original shade tabs (NW0, NW0.5, NP1.5,
B3, A3.5, B4, C3, A4, C4. In this way, the tabs and NP2.5). The NP hue corresponds to the
will be reordered from the brighter to the darker slightly reddish shades than VITA A hue. The
shade. NP1.5 Chroma is between A1 and A2 shades
There are other shade guides designed for while the NP2.5, between A2 and A3 shades. The
ceramic restorations that follow the Vitapan NW hue was created for whiter teeth (low
Classical color distribution concept. The A–D Chroma and high value) and its two tabs were
shade guide (Ivoclar Vivadent) is the common design to match adjacent bleached teeth.
color standard for Ivoclar Vivadent ceramics The Toothguide 3D-MASTER shade guide
(Fig. 3.5). It also has 16 different acrylic shade (VITA Zahnfabrik), however, is shade guide
tabs. The Noritake shade guide (Kuraray already structured on Value (Fig. 3.7). The
Noritake) is the color standard for Noritake Toothguide 3D-MASTER shade guide is based on
ceramics (Fig. 3.6). It contains 20 different shade the principle of choosing color in three quick steps.
tabs, 16 based on Vitapan Classical color concept First, selecting an appropriate value (from 1 to 5)
3 Color Selection in Operative Dentistry 25
Fig. 3.7 Ceramic shade guides: Toothguide 3D-MASTER shade guide (VITA Zahnfabrik)
according to the patient’s tooth. Then, selecting the shade tabs but with simplified presentation and a
corresponding Chroma into that value. In this step, two-step shade matching procedure: only 6 (step 1)
it is recommended to choose the middle hue group and up to 7 (step 2) linearly arranged tabs instead of
(M) to determine the Chroma (from 1 up to 3). 29 tabs presented at the beginning of a three-step
Finally, choosing the final color, checking whether procedure with Toothguide 3D-MASTER.
the patient’s tooth is more reddish (R) or more yel-
lowish (L) in comparison to the guide tab. In order 3.2.1.2 Using Shade Guides
to simplify the color selection of Toothguide for Composites
3D-MASTER, the Linearguide 3D-MASTER shade The majority of resin-based composites colors
guide (VITA Zahnfabrik), was introduced in 2008 are named based on the Vitapan Classical color
(Figs. 3.8, 3.9, 3.10 and 3.11). It contains the same distribution concept. However, several other
26 V. Salgado and D. Oliveira
Fig. 3.12 Composite shade guides: dentin shades of IPS Empress Direct system (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Fig. 3.13 Composite shade guides: enamel and translucent shades of IPS Empress Direct system (Ivoclar Vivadent)
increments of the restorative material onto the In this technique, the increments should be
dental surface allows observation of optical prop- large enough to allow proper observation
erties interaction between the material and the (Ø = 1 mm at least). The photoactivation should
dental tissues. Moreover, the thickness of a shade be performed the same as for the “final” restora-
tab is higher compared to most restorations. tion to avoid color misinterpretation due to the
There is no rule for placing the increments onto color change that occurs after cure. Then, the
the dental surface. However, the dentist should tooth and material should be wet, and the obser-
have in mind the layering concept used vation should be performed for no longer than 5 s
(Figs. 3.21–3.23). (Fig. 3.24). The chosen composite colors should
28 V. Salgado and D. Oliveira
a b
Fig. 3.14 (a) Composite shade guides: dentin shades of Miris2 system (Coltene). (Photography courtesy of Coltene).
(b) Composite shade guides: enamel and effect shades of Miris2 system (Coltene). (Photography courtesy of Coltene)
Fig. 3.15 Composite shade guide: Brillant system (Coltene). (Photography courtesy of Coltene)
be registered as well as the respective color map caused by a decrease in lightness and Chroma
draw (further explained in Chap. 7). after photopolymerization. In general, the
The resin composite that is not polymerized decrease in lightness occurs because the mono-
into the syringe is usually darker than the mers form polymers through the polymerization
photopolymerized increment used during resin process. This reaction causes the reduction of
placement. These color differences are mainly their refractive indices, thus changing the way the
light is transmitted, reflected, and refracted. The
decrease in Chroma, however, occurs due to the
consumption of the photoinitiator during the pho-
toactivation process. Camphorquinone is the
most commonly used photoinitiator in Dentistry.
However, as a yellow-colored molecule, after
reacting, its consumption leads to a decrease in
composite yellowness.
Fig. 3.18 Composite shade guide: Estelite Omega system (Tokuyama). (Photography courtesy of Tokuyama Dental)
30 V. Salgado and D. Oliveira
Fig. 3.19 Composite shade guide: Filtek Universal system (3M). (Photography courtesy of 3M)
a b
Fig. 3.20 Personalized shade guides using My Shade Guide (Smile Line): (a) filling a rubber mold with resin-based
composite; (b) pressing to remove excess; and (c) photoactivation
tin and enamel layer and ascertain the color out- natural tooth. This technique also helps to avoid
come from the mixed shades [8, 9]. This technique goniochromism (previously explained in Chap.
allows checking whether the combination of the 1), once the different translucent layers are repro-
different shades that were chosen to do really duced to confirm the final color of the restoration
match with the polychromatic appearance of the from different angles.
3 Color Selection in Operative Dentistry 31
a b
Fig. 3.21 Personalized shade guides using My Shade Guide (Smile Line): crafted tab of resin-based composite, before
(a) and after (b) joining pieces
Figs. 3.22–3.24 Visual color selection for direct restorations using increments of composite according to different
layering concepts
32 V. Salgado and D. Oliveira
Fig. 3.26 Visual color selection for direct restorations Fig. 3.29 Visual color selection for direct restorations
using shade tabs: mirrored shade tab placement to teeth in using shade tabs: importance of lip retraction to provide
order to get the same amount of illumination proper illumination to teeth and shade tab
3 Color Selection in Operative Dentistry 33
10. Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual 19. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color
and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical
three distinct observer populations and shade match- and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38(Suppl 2):e2–16.
ing protocols. Dent Mater. 2009;25(2):276–81. 20. Chu SJ. Use of a reflectance spectrophotometer in eval-
11. Simionato A, Pecho OE, Della BA. Efficacy of color uating shade change resulting from tooth-whitening
discrimination tests used in dentistry. J Esthet Restor products. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(s1):S42–8.
Dent. 2020;33(6):865–73. 21. Raoufi S, Birkhed D. Effect of whitening tooth-
12. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Perez MM, Della BA. Influence pastes on tooth staining using two different colour-
of gender on visual shade matching in dentistry. J measuring devices—a 12-week clinical trial. Int Dent
Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(2):E15–23. J. 2010;60(6):419–23.
13. Samra APB, Moro MG, Mazur RF, Vieira S, De Souza 22. Gerlach RW, Barker ML, Sagel PA. Objective and
EM, Freire A, Rached RN. Performance of dental stu- subjective whitening response of two self-directed
dents in shade matching: impact of training. J Esthet bleaching systems. Am J Dent. 2002;15:7A–12A.
Restor Dent. 2017;29(2):E24–32. 23. Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Kuo S, Johnston WM. Color
14. Wee AG, Meyer A, Wu W, Wichman CS. Lighting accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in
conditions used during visual shade match- dentistry. Dent Mater. 2006;22(6):553–9.
ing in private dental offices. J Prosthet Dent. 24. Lasserre JF, Pop-Ciutrila IS, Colosi HA. A compari-
2016;115(4):469–74. son between a new visual method of colour matching
15. Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, Qian J, He J, Qu X, Lu by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spec-
E. A systematic review of visual and instrumental trometric methods. J Dent. 2011;39(Suppl 3):e29–36.
measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence 25. Liberato WF, Barreto IC, Costa PP, Almeida CC,
Int. 2012;43(8):649–59. Pimentel W, Tiossi R. A comparison between visual,
16. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade match-
AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade- ing: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):271–5.
matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(3):193–9. 26. Yoon HI, Bae JW, Park JM, Chun YS, Kim MA, Kim
17. Li Q, Wang YN. Comparison of shade matching by M. A study on possibility of clinical application for
visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter. color measurements of shade guides using an intraoral
J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(11):848–54. digital scanner. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(7):670–5.
18. Karaagaclioglu L, Terzioglu H, Yilmaz B, Yurdukoru 27. Ebeid K, Sabet A, Della BA. Accuracy and repeatabil-
B. In vivo and in vitro assessment of an intraoral den- ity of different intraoral scanners on shade determina-
tal colorimeter. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(4):279–85. tion. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;33(6):844–8.
Color Evaluation for Research
Purposes
4
Camila Sampaio and Pablo Atria
on the type of color, with darker and more chro- in achieving a more accurate shade selection
matic shade tabs being more often mismatched result.
[3, 17]; on skin shades and gingival shades,
among others [18, 19].
Increased shade matching accuracy can be 4.2.1 Color Blindness Test or
translated into enhanced dental restorations Ishihara Test
esthetics, increased patient satisfaction, and
reduced color corrections [3]. For that purpose, Color blindness, color deficiency, or color vision
manufacturers are launching restorative materials alteration occur when the correct determination
with visual color adjustment potential to blend of the color of an object is altered. It is presented
with the surrounding enamel and dentin, result- in about 8% of the male population and 0.5% of
ing in reduced color differences and, therefore, the female population [22]. This alteration affects
improving the restoration’s esthetic appearance, the ability to identify the red, green, yellow, or
simplifying the shade matching compensating for blue colors in charge of cells located in the retina
any color mismatch [9, 20]. called cones. On the other hand, detecting
When performing visual shade matching only, changes in value or luminosity is not influenced
the only color information provided to the techni- by color deficiencies. It depends on retinal cir-
cian by many clinicians is the laboratory pre- cuits other than photoreceptor cells [22]. When
scription. However, a method to improve shade testing for color blinding, graphic designs and
matching with this technique is by performing a illustrations can be created and used, with tests
color map (Fig. 4.2), which can be simply drawn consisting of numbered colored plates, mostly
in the lab prescription or sent in a photograph. A known as Ishihara plates containing a circle of
simple photograph taken with a smartphone can dots appearing randomized in color and size
be manipulated and improves shade matching (Fig. 4.3).
and decreasing color difference values (ΔE) of In research, except for the studies which have
the comparison between the restoration per- as main objective evaluating people with color
formed by the technician and the tooth color of deficiencies [22], studies on color training typi-
comparison, as observed in a recent study [21]. cally exclude those individuals [17–19, 23, 24].
This subject will be discussed below and can help However, many times color deficiencies are an
When working with the CIE-LCh system and difference has been used extensively in dental
for more clearness, the Cartesian coordinates (L, research and applications [30]. In the majority of
a*, b*) can be converted into cylinder coordi- dental color studies, color and color differences
nates L, C, ho according to the following are quantified using the CIE-Lab color space and
formulas: the associated ΔEab.
C = a 2 + b2 –– CIE76
Based on the L a*b* values of each color,
b
h o = arctan , color determination differences can be mea-
a sured and evaluated. The L a*b*—or CIE-Lab
where L remains unchanged, C (Chroma) repre- color space (CIE of 1976) was the first for-
sents the distance from the polar axis and repre- mula to measure color difference (ΔE) accord-
sents the color intensity; and ho is the hue angle in ing to the CIE-Lab coordinates. It is the most
the equatorial plane (Fig. 4.5). Hue angle starts at commonly used in publications and color dif-
the +a* axis and is expressed in degrees (e.g., 0° ferences (ΔEab) and is calculated according to
is +a*, or red, and 90° is +b, or yellow). It has the the Euclidean difference formula [23]:
same diagram as the L*a*b* color space but uses
cylindrical coordinates instead of rectangular
∆Eab = ( L1 − L2 ) + ( a1 − a 2 ) + ( b1 − b 2 )
2 2 2
coordinates [23].
∆Eab = ∆L2 + ∆a 2 + ∆b 2 .
4.3.2 Color Difference Formulas
(ΔE)
–– CIE94
Color difference formulas provide a quantitative The CIE94 formula is defined in the
representation of the perceived color difference L*C*h* color space, showing the color differ-
(ΔE) between a pair of colored samples under a ences in lightness (or value), Chroma and hue
given set of experimental conditions [29]. Color calculated from the Lab coordinates:
2 2 2
∆L∗ ∆Cab ∗
∆H ab∗
∆E∗94 = + +
K L S L K C SC K H S H
C1∗ = a∗ 21 +b∗ 21 .
–– CIEDE2000
Different color difference formulas were
launched aiming to improve the correction
between computed and perceived color differ-
ences and reflect the individual subjective
impression of a color difference. Nowadays,
the CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) is the most accepted
and CIE recommended color difference for-
mula in dentistry, providing a better fit than
Fig. 4.5 CIE-LCh color space the previous formulas, and therefore replacing
4 Color Evaluation for Research Purposes 43
them [30]. The CIEDE2000 utilizes the con- importance of the conceptual developments of
cepts of Chroma and hue, reinforcing the Munsell [32]:
2 2 2
∆L′ ∆C ′ ∆H ′ ∆C ′ ∆H ′
∆E∗100 = + + + RT .
K S K S
L L C C H HK S K C SC K H S H
It incorporates specific corrections for non- vals along the visible spectrum [35, 36]. A spec-
uniformity of CIE-Lab color space (the weighting trophotometer contains a source of optical
functions: SL, SC, SH), a rotation term (RT) that radiation, a means of dispersing light, an optical
accounts for the interaction between Chroma and system for measuring, a detector, and converting
hue differences in the blue region and a modifica- light obtained to a signal that can be analyzed.
tion of the a* coordinate of CIE-Lab, that mainly After that, the data obtained from spectropho-
affects colors with low Chroma (neutral colors) tometers must be manipulated and translated into
and parameters accounting for the influence of a form useful for dental professionals [28]. The
illuminating and vision conditions in color differ- instruments’ measurements are frequently keyed
ence evaluation (the parametric factors: KL, KC, to dental shade guides and converted to a shade
KH). The parametric factor ratio was proposed as tab equivalent [37]. Compared with observations
a way to control changes in the magnitude of tol- by the human eye or conventional techniques, it
erance judgments and as a way to adjust for scal- was found that spectrophotometers offered a 33%
ing of acceptability rather than perceptibility. increase in accuracy and a more objective match
Studies on visual judgments performed in textile in 93.3% of the cases [38].
color acceptability and dental ceramics accept- The most used and known spectrophotometer
ability showed that using KL = 2 resulted in color available in the market, used for both research
differences better correlated to observations from and clinical aims, is the Vita Easyshade (Vita
a subset of average observers. Zahnfabrik) (Fig. 4.6). It is a contact-type spec-
When compared, changes in color calculated trophotometer that provides enough shade infor-
with the CIE-LAB and the CIEDE2000 formulas mation to help aid in the color analysis process.
followed similar trends but with different abso- Different measurement modes are possible with
lute values when calculated [33]. this instrument: tooth single-mode, tooth area
mode (cervical, middle and incisal shades), resto-
ration color verification (includes lightness,
4.3.3 Spectrophotometers Chroma, and hue comparison), and shade tab
and Colorimeters mode (practice/training mode) [39].
Colorimeters measure tristimulus values and parameters are wrongly manipulated or when dif-
filter light in red, green, and blue areas of the vis- fusers that filter the illuminant are used [27], for
ible spectrum. Although they have shown good instance, changes in lighting conditions can result
measurement repeatability, they are subject to in changes in perceived color, and an incorrect
systematic errors due to the edge-loss effect digital camera exposure and automatic white bal-
related to sample surface, while spectrophotom- ance can be reflected into an erroneously added
eters precisely measure color from reflectance or cyan to the image to neutralize the high propor-
transmittance data [19, 40]. Colorimeters do not tion of red tones from the gingiva while adding a
register spectral reflectance and can be less accu- tinge of blue to offset the yellow tones from the
rate than spectrophotometers (aging of the filters teeth [44]. For example, in soft tissues, a correct
can additionally affect accuracy) [28, 41]. white balance can distinguish healthy from
When analyzing the pros and cons of instru- inflamed tissues. For hard tissues, correct color
mental and visual methods, one can mention that rendition reveals features such as enamel translu-
instrumental methods such as spectrophotome- cency, caries, erosion and abrasion, and cervical
ters and colorimeters can help standardize color dentin exposure [45].
shade matching. On the other hand, they require Flash photography also present differences
specific and expensive technology, not always within different types of flashes, even when used
available to the clinician. On the other hand, a together with the same digital camera [27]. It was
shade guide used to perform a visual shade demonstrated that the combination of a digital
matching method is always available in dental camera with cross-polarization is the most stan-
offices. However, this method is more subjective dardized colored type of photography, although
and operator dependent. A recent study showed when performing the white balance of photo-
that the spectrophotometer can assist with visual graphs using a gray reference card with known
shade matching but cannot replace it [42]. Ideally, color values, a wireless close-up Speedlight flash
the combination of an equipment and visual showed to promote as standardized colored pho-
shade matching should be used, and the help of a tography as with the use of a filter. The same was
digital camera can promote successful results on not observed for ring flashes, which tends to
shade matching [9, 27]. darken the images if they are not white balanced
[27]. A recent study demonstrated that the prob-
lem caused by different diffusers in digital cam-
4.3.4 Digital Photography eras could be compensated by using a gray
reference card with known color coordinates to
Digital photographs can capture a detailed image white balance the photographs [27], and although
of the tooth, be easily stored and transmitted to a it did improve standardization of a digital camera
technician, providing good quality information when using a ring flash, it did not improve photo-
regarding color across the tooth surface, shape, graphs made with a smartphone.
and characteristic features. As will be further Smartphones are commonly available instru-
explored in Chap. 5, digital cameras have been ments, which have self-contained central pro-
increasingly used in dental offices to document cessing unit (CPU) computing capability,
the pre-operative situation, final results, and enriched functionalities, software applications,
long-term outcomes [9, 27, 43]. A digital instru- wireless connectivity, and can present high-
ment capable of taking photographs, being it resolution photographic technology [46]. A
either a digital camera or a smartphone, is now recent publication showed that with novel appro-
available in all dental offices; thus, it is a technol- priate light-correction filters, shade selection
ogy that can be widely used. with the smartphone and the digital camera were
Problematically, digital photographs of the comparable, showing to be reliable for shade
natural dentition typically show significant color selection, with ΔE values below the acceptable
alterations of teeth and soft tissue when certain threshold [9].
4 Color Evaluation for Research Purposes 45
Fig. 4.7 Use of the Adobe Photoshop software to describe color values without (upper image) and with (lower image)
the use of a cross-polarizing filter. Observe that total CIE-Lab values greatly vary between the photos
Thus, when using digital photograph, it is or a light-correction filter. This technique is further
important to white balance the photographs using explored in Chap. 5. The use of this software can
a gray reference card with known color values, also describe the color values in different color
which can be done using a software (for example, spaces, such as the CIE-Lab color space (Fig. 4.7).
Lightroom v6.0, Adobe Photoshop CC; Adobe Moreover, both digital camera and smartphone
Systems Inc), or combining the use of a conven- photographs can be easily manipulated to observe
tional photograph with one using a cross-polarizing tooth color and textures (Fig. 4.8).
46 C. Sampaio and P. Atria
Fig. 4.8 Digital photographs used for digital shade selec- black and white; third row, saturated. Manipulating the
tion taken with a digital camera, after manipulation with a photographs helps on observing different structures of the
digital software in different contrasts. First row: photo- teeth, as well as the luminosity
graph with teeth and substrate shade guides; second row,
for a neutral background and white balance pro- ity; nevertheless, there are situations when the
motion (Fig. 4.10) [49]. shade selection is performed against other arti-
In dental practice, the background is repre- facts [17]. A recent study selected different back-
sented most often by the darkness of the oral cav- grounds/surrounding area to simulate the
different clinical situations, such as gray (consid-
ered as neutral and most frequently recom-
mended), white (simulating color of opposite
teeth), black (simulating color selection against a
black contraster), red (imitating the lips and oral
mucosa), and blue (simulating the rubber dam).
Color matching results recorded against the blue
background were statistically worse than to other
backgrounds, while white and black generated
the best results [17].
Fig. 4.10 Tooth color selection performed against a black background, gray background, and with a cross-polarizing
filter
4 Color Evaluation for Research Purposes 49
Fig. 4.11 Some of the most used statistical tests for continuous data
Fig. 4.12 Some of the most used statistical tests for categorical data
comes of any given test is in the form of tables sample sizes (≥50 samples). In both cases, the
and graphs. null hypothesis is that the data falls within a nor-
The distribution of the data does not have a mally distributed population when p > 0.05. The
relation with the quality of the obtained data null hypothesis is accepted; therefore, the data
itself [50]. Distribution is just the pattern of val- are called normally distributed [52].
ues obtained [51]. Both empirical and theoretical It is key in statistics that all the assumptions of
distributions can be found; the most common the desired test to be performed are fulfilled.
theoretical distribution is the normal distribution, Normality is assumed in correlation, regression,
which is just a name and does not imply normal- t-test, and analysis of variance. Whenever there is
ity. For a normally distributed dataset, the major- a Normally distributed dataset, a parametric test
ity of the sample’s values or observations (95%) can be used; if this condition is not met, then the
will be in the center of the distribution. use of a non-parametric test is required. Non-
Recommended tests to evaluate the normality of parametric tests include Wilcoxon signed-rank
the data are the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and test, the Mann–Whitney U test, and the Kruskal–
the Shapiro–Wilk test. Usually, the Shapiro–Wilk Wallis test.
test will be the appropriate method for small Among the most commonly used tests, there
sample sizes (<50 samples), while the
is the Bonferroni test, which is intended to use for
Kolmogorov–Smirnov test will be used for larger a small number of comparisons (<5), however,
50 C. Sampaio and P. Atria
when dealing with larger than five comparisons, 6. Felippe LA, Monteiro S Jr, De Andrada CAC, Di
the preferred test is the Tukey test [50]. When the Cerqueira AD, Ritter AV. Clinical strategies for suc-
cess in proximoincisal composite restorations. Part I:
sample sizes and population variances are differ- understanding color and composite selection. J Esthet
ent between groups, the Games–Howell and Restor Dent. 2004;16(6):336–47.
Dunnett’s tests give accurate results [50]. 7. Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, de Oliveira
Other recommended tests that authors have OB. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency
and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent.
used in studies involving clinical measurements 2011;23(2):73–87.
are repeated measurements tests, where time- 8. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part III. Color
invariant unobservable differences between indi- control. J Prosthet Dent. 1974;31(2):146–54.
viduals can be controlled. This allows the 9. Jorquera GJ, Atria PJ, Galán M, Feureisen J, Imbarak
M, Kernitsky J, et al. A comparison of ceramic crown
researcher to estimate the variations within indi- color difference between different shade selection
viduals. Here is where linear models come into methods: visual, digital camera, and smartphone.
play to fit the data, assuming that the distribution J Prosthet Dent. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
is Normal. Other linear models involve linear prosdent.2020.07.029
10. Igiel C, Lehmann KM, Ghinea R, Weyhrauch M,
mixed models which are used when there is Hangx Y, Scheller H, et al. Reliability of visual and
nonindependence in the dataset. On the other
instrumental color matching. J Esthet Restor Dent.
side, when a non-parametric test is required, the 2017;29(5):303–8.
option would be to use generalized estimating 11. Paravina RD. Performance assessment of dental shade
guides. J Dent. 2009;37:e15–20.
equations (GEE) which includes subject-specific 12. Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Dental color stan-
random effects. dards: shade tab arrangement. J Esthet Restor Dent.
This method also assumes that the values are 2001;13(4):254–63.
correlated so that cases are not independent; for 13. Sampaio CS, Gurrea J, Gurrea M, Bruguera A, Atria
PJ, Janal M, et al. Dental shade guide variability for
example, when performing multiple color mea- hues B, C, and D using cross-polarized photography.
surements over time, compare different treat- Int J Periodontic Restor Dent. 2018;38:113–8.
ments or different color measuring methods. 14. Clary JA, Ontiveros JC, Cron SG, Paravina
Figures 4.11 and 4.12 summarizes some of the RD. Influence of light source, polarization, education,
and training on shade matching quality. J Prosthet
most used statistical tests. Dent. 2016;116(1):91–7.
For statistical analysis, the preferred software 15. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Perez MM, Della BA. Influence
to use due to its interface is SPSS (IBM). Hence, of gender on visual shade matching in dentistry. J
it is always advised to have a prior consultation Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(2):E15–23.
16. Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbely J,
with a statistician to match the data, analysis, and Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, et al. Does gender and expe-
conclusions. rience influence shade matching quality? J Dent.
2009;37:e40–e4.
17. Dudea D, Gasparik C, Botos A, Alb F, Irimie A,
References Paravina RD. Influence of background/surrounding
area on accuracy of visual color matching. Clin Oral
Investig. 2016;20(6):1167–73.
1. Paravina RD, O’Neill PN, Swift EJ Jr, Nathanson
18. Di Murro B, Gallusi G, Nardi R, Libonati A, Angotti
D, Goodacre CJ. Teaching of color in predoctoral
V, Campanella V. The relationship of tooth shade and
and postdoctoral dental education in 2009. J Dent.
skin tone and its influence on the smile attractiveness.
2010;38:e34–40.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(1):57–63.
2. Bergen SF, Paravina RD. Color education and training
19. Perez MM, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Carrillo F, Ionescu
in dentistry: a first-hand perspective. J Esthet Restor
AM, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds for
Dent. 2017;29(2):E3–5.
computer-simulated human Gingiva. J Esthet Restor
3. Ristic I, Stankovic S, Paravina RD. Influence of color
Dent. 2018;30(2):E24–30.
education and training on shade matching skills. J
20. de Abreu JLB, Sampaio CS, Benalcázar Jalkh EB,
Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28(5):287–94.
Hirata R. Analysis of the color matching of univer-
4. Paravina RD, Pérez MM, Ghinea R. Acceptability
sal resin composites in anterior restorations. J Esthet
and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: a compre-
Restor Dent. 2020;33(2):269–76.
hensive review of clinical and research applications. J
21. Pereira Sanchez N, Powers JM, Paravina
Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(2):103–12.
RD. Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color
5. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part I. The
adjustment potential of resin composites. J Esthet
three-dimensional nature of color. J Prosthet Dent.
Restor Dent. 2019;31(5):465–70.
1973;29(4):416–24.
4 Color Evaluation for Research Purposes 51
22. Wagner S, Rioseco M, Ortuño D, Cortés MF, Costa computer- aided pre-and post-tooth shade determi-
C. Effectiveness of a protocol for teaching dental nation using various home bleaching procedures. J
tooth color in students with color vision impairment. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(2):92–100.
Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(6):601–6. 37. Lagouvardos PE, Fougia AG, Diamantopoulou SA,
23. Bratner S, Hannak W, Boening K, Klinke T. Color Polyzois GL. Repeatability and interdevice reli-
determination with no-match-templates using two ability of two portable color selection devices in
different tooth color scales—an in vitro evaluation. J matching and measuring tooth color. J Prosthet Dent.
Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(6):593–600. 2009;101(1):40–5.
24. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel 38. Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hämmerle C. Visual and
C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J
dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27:S1–9. Dent Res. 2002;81(8):578–82.
25. ISO/TR 28642:2016. Dentistry—Guidance on colour 39. https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com.
measurement; 2016. 40. Chu SJ, Paravina RD, Sailer I, Mieleszko AJ. Color
26. Takatsui F, de Andrade MF, Neisser MP, Barros LAB, in dentistry: a clinical guide to predictable esthetics.
de Loffredo LCM. CIE L* a* b*: comparison of digi- Hanover Park: Quintessence; 2017.
tal images obtained photographically by manual and 41. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee
automatic modes. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26(6):578–83. AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-
27. Sampaio CS, Atria PJ, Hirata R, Jorquera matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(3):193–9.
G. Variability of color matching with different digital 42. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Alessandretti R, Pérez MM,
photography techniques and a gray reference card. J Della BA. Visual and instrumental shade matching
Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):333–9. using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference for-
28. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color mulas. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):82–92.
matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical 43. Hein S, Zangl M. The use of a standardized gray
and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38:e2–e16. reference card in dental photography to correct
29. Paravina RD, Swift EJ Jr. Color in dentistry: the effects of five commonly used diffusers on the
match me, match me not. J Esthet Restor Dent. color of 40 extracted human teeth. Int J Esthet Dent.
2009;21(2):133–9. 2016;11(2):246–59.
30. Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra 44. Snow SR. Assessing and achieving accuracy in
A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental digital dental photography. J Calif Dent Assoc.
ceramics. J Dent. 2010;38:e57–64. 2009;37(3):185–91.
31. Paravina RD, Westland S, Kimura M, Powers JM, 45. Casaglia A, De Dominicis P, Arcuri L, Gargari M,
Imai FH. Color interaction of dental materials: Ottria L. Dental photography today. Part 1: basic con-
blending effect of layered composites. Dent Mater. cepts. Oral Implantol. 2015;8(4):122.
2006;22(10):903–8. 46. Tam W-K, Lee H-J. Accurate shade image matching
32. Commission Internationale del É clairage. CIE by using a smartphone camera. J Prosthodont Res.
Technical Report: Colorimetry. CIE Pub No. 15.3. 2017;61(2):168–76.
Vienna ACCB. 47. Suliman S, Sulaiman TA, Olafsson VG, Delgado AJ,
33. De Oliveira DCRS, Ayres APA, Rocha MG, Giannini Donovan TE, Heymann HO. Effect of time on tooth
M, Puppin Rontani RM, Ferracane JL, et al. Effect dehydration and rehydration. J Esthet Restor Dent.
of different in vitro aging methods on color stabil- 2019;31(2):118–23.
ity of a dental resin-based composite using CIELAB 48. Curd FM, Jasinevicius TR, Graves A, Cox V, Sadan
and CIEDE 2000 color-difference formulas. J Esthet A. Comparison of the shade matching ability of den-
Restor Dent. 2015;27(5):322–30. tal students using two light sources. J Prosthet Dent.
34. Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional 2006;96(6):391–6.
visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for 49. https://smilelineusa.com.
porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical compari- 50. Krithikadatta J, Valarmathi S. Research methodol-
son. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(6):577. ogy in dentistry: part II—the relevance of statistics in
35. Khurana R, Tredwin C, Weisbloom M, Moles D. A research. J Conserv Dent JCD. 2012;15(3):206.
clinical evaluation of the individual repeatability 51. Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes: the normal
of three commercially available colour measuring distribution. BMJ. 1995;310(6975):298.
devices. Br Dent J. 2007;203(12):675–80. 52. Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C,
36. Kielbassa AM, Beheim-Schwarzbach NJ, Neumann Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for
K, Zantner C. In vitro comparison of visual and statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):67.
Dental Photography as a Key
to Clinical Success
5
Lucas Fernando Tabata, Toni Arcuri,
and Leandro Augusto Hilgert
Much of dental treatment success relies on effi- pact cameras have become a viable entry level
cient communication between professionals and option for the world of dental photography.
patients, among members of the professional Understanding how a digital camera works and
team, along with the laboratory prosthesis techni- knowing the differences between the various
cian involved in the treatment. Dental photogra- cameras and accessories available is imperative.
phy allows us to capture details and share certain As is acquiring knowledge on their advantages
aspects of a clinical case, such as tooth shape, and limitations, knowing how to adjust the set-
texture, color, and perceived translucency [1, 2]. tings of your equipment, and mastering the con-
Furthermore, it enriches the communication cepts and fundamentals of photography. Grasping
between work team and patient since they enable these core aspects will help you obtain even bet-
us to capture smile harmony, the exposure of the ter images.
incisal edge with resting lips, gingival exposure,
and oral corridor. Photographs have become an
essential tool in dentistry, as they have improved 5.1 Digital Cameras
the way we communicate and relate to people.
Besides documenting cases and assisting in plan- There are currently several types of digital cam-
ning treatments, dental photography also offers eras available for use in dentistry from different
the possibility of reviewing the treatment per- manufacturers. They each bear its own character-
formed to enhance and evolve our skills. DSLR istics, indications, and limitations, and can be
(digital single-lens reflex) cameras are currently classified into five distinct groups as presented in
the gold standard in dentistry for providing high- the image below (Fig. 5.1).
quality results, on top of the ease of sharing the
images and videos obtained. However, with tech-
nological development, more straightforward 5.1.1 Smartphones
digital cameras such as smartphones and com-
Smartphone cameras have evolved significantly
L. F. Tabata (*) · L. A. Hilgert in the recent years, as have devices and their pro-
Department of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, cessors in general. Instead of using lenses with
University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil optical zoom—which would compromise the
e-mail: [email protected] thickness of phones—most manufacturers have
T. Arcuri incorporated multiple lenses. High-end smart-
School of Dentistry, Uniceplac University, phones have three lenses (ultra-wide, wide, and
Brasilia, DF, Brazil
telephoto lens) that can be easily selected accord- turing good quality dental photographs is the use
ing to each specific situation. However, even with of an external continuous light source, such as
the versatility of using multiple lenses, the image LED panels or an LED ring light. This allows
capture sensors in these devices are still small. brighter images to be obtained and avoids high
They tend to obtain more pixelated images when noise in the image by the camera’s ISO (sensitiv-
greatly enlarged or in low light environments. ity) compensation.
Some devices feature a pro mode or manual
mode, which allows for the adjustment of set-
tings. When this function is not present, there are 5.1.2 Compact Cameras
specific downloadable apps for this purpose.
Even though they do not have a dedicated macro- Developed to be portable and user-friendly, these
lens, their portability and accessibility make were the first digital equipment accessible to the
them excellent entry option to start capturing general public, that associated the digital technol-
dental photographs, despite their limitations. ogy of the time with affordability. Also known as
Recommendation: if you opt to use a smart- point-and-shoot cameras, they had added features
phone for dental photography, since they do not to facilitate usage. These properties included
include a dedicated macro-lens, we suggest opt- automatic mode, autofocus, retractable zoom
ing for a model with multiple lenses (Fig. 5.2). lenses, built-in flash, and video recording, mak-
Remember to check that one of the lenses is a ing them very popular since the beginning of the
telephoto lens. If your smartphone does not offer year 2000. Nowadays, some compact cameras
a telephoto lens option, you can use the digital even feature a manual mode for configuring cam-
zoom of your device, mindful that this will lower era settings and, along with smartphones, they
the resolution of image. The use of telephoto lens are an excellent entry level choice for the world
or digital zoom causes less image distortion since of dental photography.
wide and ultra-wide lenses tend to change the Recommendations: if present, we recommend
photographed object’s proportion, known as the using the camera in manual mode, with the
barrel distortion. Another critical point for cap- macro-function activated, employing the optical
5 Dental Photography as a Key to Clinical Success 55
Fig. 5.2 X-ray of smartphones showing the digital camera components. (Adapted from https://www.creativeelectron.com/)
zoom lens to reduce image distortion. It is recom- This feature grants users the ability to adapt to
mended to combine it with an LED illuminator or different situations. We recommend using a dedi-
an external flash to synchronize with camera’s cated macro-lens from 100 to 105 mm and a cir-
shutter, whenever available. cular or twin macro-flash.
5.2.1 Sensor
5.1.5 Specific Cameras for Dentistry
Sensors are responsible for capturing the light
There is also on the market a digital dental cam- reflected by an object, which will later be pro-
era designed exclusively for dentistry (EyeSpecial cessed to acquire the desired photographed
C-IV, SHOFU, JAPAN), which incorporates the image. There are two main types of image sen-
advantages of DSLR cameras with the simplicity sors for digital cameras and camcorders: CMOS
of compact cameras. It features software with a and CCD. Both are made of silicon and work in
user-friendly interface, touchscreen and the menu similar way. They depend on the photoelectric
offers pre-configured modes. Among its advan- effect, the interaction between photons (particles
tages is the body. Its lightweight unibody con- of light) and the silicon, to move the electrons in
struction in polymer is resistant to moisture and the sensor to capture the image. All these sensors
disinfection protocols, favoring biosafety within are charge-coupled devices and their basic func-
the office space. It features a dual twin flash inte- tions are to capture images and transform them
grated into the camera body, which is selected into electrons (electromagnetic signals) and bits
according to the pre-configured modes. There is and bytes by a microprocessor in an analog-
also a 28–300 mm lens with the option of adding digital process that generates the image. The
a close-up lens for macro-photography, and an main difference among equipment resides in the
adapter for cross-polarized photography for pho- type and size of sensor used (Fig. 5.4).
tos of color selection. Professional DSLR cameras use full-frame sen-
We advise using the pre-configured modes sors, while intermediate and entry level DSLRs
recommended by the manufacturer, since the use APS-C sensors (1.5–1.6x smaller than the
equipment is specific for dentistry. full-frame sensor). Compact cameras use 1″
5 Dental Photography as a Key to Clinical Success 57
sensors, while smartphones use 1/3″ sensors, size of electronic components. Larger bodies pro-
almost 50 times smaller than the full-frame vide space for larger sensors and enable better
sensor. handling and grip. In DSLR or mirrorless cam-
eras, it is possible to connect a single lens and
5.2.1.1 How Important Is the Size flashes to the equipment’s body. Not all compact
of the Sensor? cameras include these options, and it is not possi-
A digital camera’s resolution is often limited by ble to exchange lenses. Only a few models offer
the image sensor that turns light into discrete sig- the possibility to connect an external flash to the
nals. Depending on the sensor’s physical struc- camera body. In smartphones, the camera body is
ture, a color filter array may be used, which integrated with the mobile itself, which, like com-
requires demosaicing to recreate a full-color pact cameras, offers little possibility of adapting
image. The brighter the image at a given point on direct lenses and synchronizing flashes as DLSRs
the sensor, the higher the value read for that pixel. and mirrorless do.
The number of pixels in the sensor determines
the camera’s “pixel count.” In a typical sensor,
the pixel count is the product of the number of 5.2.3 Lens
rows and the number of columns. For example, a
1000 by 1000 pixel sensor would have 1000,000 A lens is composed of several optical elements,
pixels or 1 megapixel. In practice, while smaller which can be made of plastic or glass. Optical
sensors tend to produce more pixelated and nois- glass elements generally provide a clearer,
ier images, larger sensors capture more defined higher-quality lens result. Each element has a
images. These present superior color contrast and specific function in focusing the light towards the
performance in a low light situation, lower noise sensor, either generally shaping the light to fit the
at high ISOs, and lower crosstalk. sensor’s size, correcting problems, or providing
the final point of focus. An interesting feature of
these lenses is the automatic focus. In this case, a
5.2.2 Camera Body motor’s aid allows for the final optical element or
collection of some elements to be moved closer
The framework is responsible for maintaining and or farther from the sensor. This enables different
protecting the sensor and processor, along with areas of an image to appear in focus and is one of
supplemental electronic equipment, that together the main aspects of a practical camera system.
allow the camera to function. The body’s size may The lens can be considered the most important
vary between equipment based on the amount and element of a camera. Aspects such as number,
58 L. F. Tabata et al.
Fig. 5.5 Display of barrel distortion. Barrel distortion is usually present in most lenses, especially at wide angles. The
distortion amount can vary, depending on the distance between camera and object, especially over short distances
5 Dental Photography as a Key to Clinical Success 59
Fig. 5.7 Artificial lighting equipment available for use in dental photography
should also be considered when choosing Another interesting possibility of using LED
between these options. equipment is while filming. Whether with DSLR,
mirrorless, compact, or smartphone cameras, a
5.2.5.1 Continuous Light Equipment continuous light source is always needed.
LED means light-emitting diodes. The light
source in such devices is generated by a series of 5.2.5.2 Flash Equipment
light-emitting diodes present in each lamp. These Photographic flash, sometimes referred to as a
illuminators are classified as continuous light strobe or simply a flash, is a device used in pho-
equipment because the light remains on the entire tography to allow pictures of dark areas to be
time and does not flash like a strobe light. Most taken by producing an extremely bright light. This
LED equipment offers brightness adjustment for illumination is not continuous and, in a small frac-
the emitted light, as well as color temperature tion of a second, it bursts outward in large
adjustment option, which ranges from 3300 (yel- amounts. Most photographic equipment includes
lowish light) to 6600 K (white light), for exam- built-in flash, but external flashes will be needed
ple. Since LEDs are not as bright as the light for dentistry purposes since they enhance the
emitted from a flash light, they are not recom- lighting system. A critical factor when using this
mended for taking photographs with DSLR or light source is the need to synchronize the firing
mirrorless cameras. However, it is possible if you of the photographic flash with the digital camera’s
use a high ISO setting (800+) or position them shutter opening, to enable light to be captured by
very close to your subject. the electronic image sensor. In DSLRs and mir-
Despite that, LED illuminators are effective rorless cameras, the mechanism is usually a pro-
with smartphone cameras and compact cameras grammable electronic timing circuit, which can,
(Fig. 5.8) since the camera’s shot cannot be syn- in some equipment, receive input from a mechani-
chronized with the flash device in this case. cal shutter contact or work wirelessly.
5 Dental Photography as a Key to Clinical Success 61
Fig. 5.8 Artistic photography was obtained using studio flash and a DSLR camera equipped with a 100 mm
macro-lens
5.2.5.3 Macro-Flash for DSLRs within the dental office. There are currently dif-
and Mirrorless ferent models on the market, which can be
For dental photographs, based on equipment con- mounted on tripods or attached to the dental
figuration adjustments (which will be later dis- office’s ceiling. These models have greater power
cussed in this chapter), and due to the need to than macro-flashes and work plugged in, allow-
capture close-up photographs of subjects, built-in ing for a faster firing cycle and less variety of
flashes are not recommended as they create shad- light intensity since they do not depend on batter-
ows in the image. Instead, macro-flashes, like ies. Studio flashes are generally combined with
ring light and twin flashes, should be your first softboxes or umbrellas, which help diffuse the
option for such situations. The advantage of these light from the flash, and provide softer shadows
flashes is the ability to position the light source at in the images, with a more artistic appeal
the same plane as the lens, which provides better (Fig. 5.8).
lighting for dental photos. An alternative to
macro-flashes is the use of a pair of conventional
external flashes, mounted on a bracket or on tri- 5.2.6 Light Modifying Accessories
pods, that are activated in remote mode to func-
tion as a twin flash or a studio flash. A critical The main objective of modifying the light of a
factor when using these sources is the need to photographic flash is to soften shadows. Since
correctly set the light’s intensity. This can be con- the photographic flash is a small, high-intensity
trolled automatically or in manual mode by the light source, it usually produces harsh, unattract-
operator, providing greater control over the final ive shadows. Hard light directly affects the pho-
result of the image. tographed object, by causing a well-marked and
sharp shadow. Unlike with hard lights, the shad-
5.2.5.4 Studio Flash ows generated by soft lights are absent of sharp
Another option that has become very attractive to edges, making it impossible to determine exactly
clinicians is the use of studio flash equipment where the shadow begins or ends (Fig. 5.9).
62 L. F. Tabata et al.
Fig. 5.10 For front photos, we recommend the use of a graphed) and “C” shaped retractor (for the contralateral
bilateral retractor, also known as self-retracting or unilat- side). For occlusal photos, we recommend using a modi-
eral retractors. For side shots, we suggest the use of an fied bilateral retractor with a mirror or an anterior photo
associated “V” shaped retractor (for the side to be photo- with a black background
Fig. 5.12 Impact of the Shutter Speed on motion blur. (Adapted from https://digitalwarehouseblog.wordpress.
com/2016/01/26/when-the-lights-go-down-low-light/)
66 L. F. Tabata et al.
technique widely used when it comes to high- sensitivity of the digital sensor to light, and it var-
lighting the subject in the foreground. ies between 50 and 128,000. The higher the ISO,
In short, a large aperture (small number) pro- the lesser amount of light is needed to obtain a
duces a reduced depth of field (small area of correct exposure since the sensitivity of the digital
sharpness). A small aperture (large number) leads sensor to capture light will be grater.
to a greater depth of field (area of deep sharp- The sensitivity of today’s cameras reaches
ness). See Fig. 5.14. 128,000 ISO, and noise is almost invisible up
to 3200 ISO. Noise can be defined as a kind of
5.3.1.5 Sensitivity (ISO) interference in the image that manifests itself
The sensitivity of the image sensor (expressed in in the form of pixels of very different colors
ISO—International Organization for Standardiza- from reality, usually in dark scenes [5]
tion) is the standard that describes the absolute (Fig. 5.15).
5 Dental Photography as a Key to Clinical Success 67
However, it is best to keep the ISO as low as These settings adjustments may vary from equip-
possible: 100 ISO for sunny days, 200 ISO for ment to equipment, depending on the type,
cloudy days, and up to 400 ISO indoors. model, and manufacturer. Below you will find a
Nevertheless, if the scene demands it, do not hes- summary of general equipment configurations,
itate to raise the ISO. though it is crucial that you carry out some tests
with your equipment and adjust it according to
5.3.1.6 Impact of Sensitivity on Image your needs (Table 5.1 and Fig. 5.16).
Noise
As previously mentioned, increasing the ISO
sensitivity can make photos lighter, however, it 5.4 Dental Photography
decreases the sharpness because it produces with Gray Card
undesirable noise in the images due to the greater
sensitivity to capture light. Gray cards are designed to help you adjust your
It is recommended to maintain minimum sen- exposure and white balance settings consistently,
sitivity in Dental Photography. The ideal is to providing a reference point. This reference point
work with the ISO as low as possible, preferably will define a white balance or color balance point
in a range of 100–200, aiming to obtain images for a given image and all images subsequently
with the lowest possible level of noise and greater captured. The reference point will ask your cam-
clarity. Any dark or shady area in the oral cavity era to compensate for any illuminating color in
can have its lighting issue resolved by using an the space you plan to shoot, adjusting the white
integrated flash system specifically for this balance and the color profile (Fig. 5.17). With a
purpose. gray card, it becomes possible to correct the val-
ues of color differences of dental elements to
visually imperceptible values. This achieves one
5.3.2 Master the Exposure of Your of the major advances in the standardization of
Equipment photography for color registration. To measure
your reference point, place the gray card in the
As we have seen, the correct adjustment of your area or scene where you intend to capture, with
equipment can favor obtaining better images. the gray side facing the camera. For most accu-
68 L. F. Tabata et al.
Fig. 5.16 Image results from smartphone plus LED (top left). Compact camera plus LED (top right). DSLR camera
with a macro-lens and ring flash (bottom left). DSLR camera with a macro-lens and twin flash (bottom right)
rate results, place the card close to the patient’s repeat a new photo with the gray card whenever
mouth so that it reflects the light from the flash. you change the lighting settings.
Then, adjust the white balance settings on the Another possibility is the post-processing pro-
camera to ensure optimal exposure and focus. cedure of white balance correction in software
Shoot normally, remembering that you must like Photoshop or Lightroom. To do so, merely
5 Dental Photography as a Key to Clinical Success 69
Fig. 5.19 Photo with color scale for communication with Fig. 5.20 Photo with the color scale using the reflected
the laboratory. Note that the reflection of the flash inter- cross-polarization. By removing the flash light reflection,
feres with the correct color analysis a better color evaluation of the patient’s smile is possible
communication with laboratory technicians, a DSLR camera with twin flash, a DSLR camera
which makes the rehabilitation much more pre- with twin flash and light modifiers, and a DSLR
dictable (Fig. 5.23). camera with twin flash with polar eyes system,
Sampaio et al. [10], compared the perfor- associated with the use of a gray card. They con-
mance of different digital equipment and acces- cluded that the use of gray cards favored results,
sories for color selection. Among them were a optimizing the usage of digital equipment for
smartphone, a DSLR camera with circular flash, color selection. The employment of reflected
cross-polarization with the polar eyes system
showed the best results and, according to this
study, the smartphone was the least accurate.
Fig. 5.21 Polar-eyes® cross-polarization filters. (Adapted Fig. 5.23 Result achieved, harmonizing the element with
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZwNKHnQyPw) a darkened substrate to the rest of the dental elements
Fig. 5.22 The color taking of the substrate of the dental element, with the aid of reflected polarized light, for esthetic
rehabilitation
72 L. F. Tabata et al.
As we mentioned at the beginning of this tion of treatment stages, and enhancing the level
chapter, smartphones and compact cameras are of recorded details.
still a long away from offering the same In our experience, patients enjoy and value
photographic quality achieved with DSLRs and seeing on a screen (or even on the camera’s LCD)
mirrorless equipment. Nevertheless, these what is being performed during treatment. A clin-
devices work for the entry level path in the world ical picture can be a valuable instrument to
of dental photography and can be used until a increase patients’ understanding of why certain
better equipment can be acquired. Although they procedures are needed, for educating patients on
present some limitations (regarding sensor size required behavioral changes, and for treatment
and absence of a dedicated macro-lens), good planning. A well-known concept that uses stan-
results may be achieved with proper lighting and dardized clinical pictures (and videos) for plan-
configuration setup. And indeed, a simpler pic- ning a dental treatment is the Digital Smile
ture of a clinical case performed with straightfor-Design (DSD). It also allows digitally simulating
ward devices are better than no photo at all. possible treatment results and to visually explain
(show) to the patient what may be achieved. This
tool certainly aids esthetic treatment plan
5.7 Photography in the Daily acceptance.
Practice of Dentistry Post-treatment pictures, with or without an
“artistic touch,” are also very useful. And not
In the last decades, the evolution of digital cam- only for documentation, or to allow long-term
eras and accessories, its user-friendliness, larger follow-ups comparisons, but to reinforce patients’
accessibility, and lower costs, have exponentially perception of the dentists’ work quality, which
increased the role of images in the dental practice increases patients’ fidelity.
quotidian. Before and after photographs may also be
Nowadays, it is possible to affirm that there is used for marketing purposes. Be sure to always
always a feasible way, regardless of budget, of respect local regulations in terms of patients’ pri-
recording dental treatment steps. Either by using vacy and all mandatory legal authorizations.
an always present smartphone or a high-end cam- Well performed dental pictures greatly
era with plenty of accessories, capturing relevant enhance the communication between dental pro-
visual information opens a myriad of uses for the fessionals when discussing treatment plans and
images. Quality will certainly vary according to are valuable assets for educational and scientific
the used equipment and the photographer’s train- purposes. Presenting clinical cases with images
ing and experience. Adjusting the needed equip- rich with relevant information, together with a
ment for one’s routine is an exercise that, if well solid scientific content, is the cornerstone of
performed, will result in finding the best cost- many of the best lectures at the main dental con-
benefit for each particular case. gresses of the world.
The first reason to include photography in the For those involved in prosthodontics, enabling
dental practice routine to record patients’ base- the dental technician to see, in detail, the clinical
line and post-treatment images with the intent of case for which an indirect restoration will be pro-
documentation. It is also important for legal pro- duced is truly a must. Tooth color, shape, texture,
tection and for long-term follow-ups. As com- and the singularities of each patient’s tooth can
monly said, an image is worth a thousand words. be easily shared. Digital photography and, in
Nowadays with the availability of electronic files present days, the commonly digital flux of restor-
for patients, digital images can be easily attached ative dentistry have surely increased the quality
and stored to records, enriching the documenta- of exchanged information and reduced distances
5 Dental Photography as a Key to Clinical Success 73
in the dentist/dental technician relationship. The 3. Santos JF. Luz, exposição, composição, equipamento.
Farmalicão: Centro Atlântico; 2010.
use of standardized reference shade tabs, gray 4. Terry DA, Geller W. Esthetic and restorative den-
cards, calibrated monitors, and a good under- tistry: material selection and technique. Chicago:
standing of some of the dental photography con- Quintessence; 2013.
cepts presented in this chapter on both the clinical 5. Peterson B. Understanding exposure, fourth edition:
how to shoot great photographs with any camera.
and the laboratory ends of the process strengthen New York: Amphoto; 2016.
the level of communication [11]. 6. Hallimond F, Taylor EW. An improved polarizing
On the topic of color, standardized digital microscope. III. The slotted ocular and the slotted
photography—particularly those using concepts objective. Mineral Mag. 1948;28:296–302.
7. MicroscopyU. The source for microscopy education.
of exposure adjustment with a gray card and Introduction to polarized light. https://www.micros-
reflected cross-polarization—can be used not copyu.com/techniques/polarized-light/introduction-
only to shade selection in prosthodontics [11, to-polarized-light. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.
12], but also for the quantification of color in 8. Takatsui F, Andrade MF, Neisser MP, Barros LA,
Loffredo LC. CIE L* a* b*: comparison of digital
clinical research [14]. images obtained photographically by manual and
automatic modes. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26:578–83.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242012005000025.
5.8 Final Remarks 9. Hein S, Zangl M. The use of standardized grey reference
card in dental photography to correct the effects of five
commonly used diffusers on the color of 40 extracted
Dental photography is an inseparable part of human teeth. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11(2):246–59.
modern Dentistry. In every dental specialty, pre- 10. Sampaio CS, Atria PJ, Hirata R, Jorquera
dominantly those involved in esthetics, the use of G. Variability of color matching with different digi-
tal photography techniques and a gray reference
images has increasingly gained relevance over card. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;121(2):333–9. https://doi.
the past years. Knowledge of the basics of the org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.009.
subject, such as required equipment, fundamen- 11. Hein S, Tapia J, Bazos P. eLABor_aid: a new
tals of photography, and some practical training approach to digital shade management. Int J Esthet
Dent. 2017;12(2):186–202.
on achieving useful images, should be part of a 12. Jorquera GJ, Atria PJ, Galán M, Feureisen J, Imbarak
contemporary dental curriculum. M, Kernitsky J, Cacciuttolo F, Hirata R, Sampaio
CS. A comparison of ceramic crown color difference
between different shade selection methods: visual,
digital camera, and smartphone. J Prosthet Dent.
References 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.029.
13. Bartholin E. Experimenta crystalli islandici disdi-
1. Zyman P, Etienne JM. Recording and communi- aclastici quibus mira & insolita refractio detegitur.
cating shared with digital photography: concepts Munich: The Bavarian State Library; 1669.
and considerations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 14. Schoppmeier CM, Derman SHM, Noack MJ, Wicht
2002;14(1):49–51. MJ. Power bleaching enhances resin infiltration
2. Chu SJ, Tarnow DP. Digital shade analysis and veri- masking effect of dental fluorosis. A randomized
fication: a case report and discussion. Pract Proced clinical trial. J Dent. 2018;79:77–84. https://doi.
Aesthet Dent. 2001;13(2):129–36. org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.005.
Bleaching Procedures
6
Vinícius Salgado
6.1 Tooth Discoloration Etiology tion during tooth development as metabolic dis-
orders of Alkaptonuria, congenital erythropoietic
The color of teeth is determined by a combina- porphyria, congenital hyperbilirubinemia, ame-
tion of intrinsic color and the presence of any logenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta,
extrinsic colored stain that may form on the tooth molar incisor hypomineralization, other systemic
surface. The tooth discoloration can be classified syndromes, and to inherited disorders which
according to the origin of stain in intrinsic, extrin- involve only the hard tissue forming at the time as
sic, or internalized discoloration [1]. tetracycline staining, fluorosis, enamel hypopla-
Intrinsic tooth color is associated with the sia [2] (Figs. 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5 and 6.6).
light energy interaction with the dental tissues However, intrinsic tooth staining can also
such as reflection, transmission, scattering, and occur after tooth eruption. First, it is related to
absorption optical phenomena [2]. The enamel is physiological aging, which increases tooth color
a highly mineralized tissue (about 97%) mainly darkness. Due to continuous chemical and
constituted of colorless hydroxyapatite crystals mechanical wear of enamel through age, that
in needles-shape that form a complex, hierarchi- becomes thinner and more translucent, i.e., the
cal, and organized microstructure. The enamel dentin will become more visible. Furthermore,
has a slight white color and higher translucency. the darkness of tooth color intensifies due to the
The dentin is a protein-rich bone-like biocom- physiological laying down of secondary dentin,
posite tissue containing a mineral phase (about
70%) mainly constituted by hydroxyapatite, an
organic phase mainly constituted by collagen and
water. Its hue varies among yellow, orange, and
brown shades with low translucency.
The intrinsic tooth discoloration occurs fol-
lowing a change in tooth structural composition
or thickness of the hard dental tissues, altering
the light-transmitting properties of tooth struc-
ture. The intrinsic tooth discoloration may be
related to factors that occur prior to tooth erup-
Fig. 6.1 Intrinsic tooth discoloration related to inherited
disorders that occur prior to tooth eruption: Amelogenesis
V. Salgado (*) imperfecta (Photography courtesy of Dr. Dayane
Private Practice, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Oliveira et al.)
Fig. 6.3 Intrinsic tooth discoloration related to inherited Fig. 6.6 Intrinsic tooth discoloration related to inherited
disorders that occur prior to tooth eruption: severe tetracy- disorders that occur prior to tooth eruption: severe fluoro-
cline staining sis staining
Fig. 6.10 Intrinsic tooth discoloration related to inher- Fig. 6.13 Internalized discoloration related to extrinsic
ited disorders that occur after to tooth eruption: element stain incorporation within the tooth structure due enamel
11 with history of dental trauma. Situation after 5 years of porous surface by dental caries
endodontic treatment and patient’s report of progressively
darkening intensification. Brownish staining due pulp
hemorragic products oxidation metal-containing molecules. The dental extrin-
sic staining is influenced by inadequate tooth
brushing, dietary intake of colored food and
solutions (e.g., coffee, tea, cola soda, and red
wine), exposure to nicotine and other tobacco
products, and use of cationic agents such
chlorhexidine and metal salts (e.g. tin and iron)
[1]. Inorganic chromophores are colored transi-
tion metal ions of iron, copper, manganese, or
tin. In the form of metal complexes, organic and
inorganic chromophores may also be present in
combination, e.g., in h emoglobin, where a col-
ored porphyrin ligand is combined with a col-
Fig. 6.11 Extrinsic tooth discoloration related to deposi- ored iron [4].
tion of chromogens onto the dental surface
The internalized discoloration is the extrinsic
stain incorporation within the tooth structure,
named chromogens by the pellicle coating (a mainly those associated with dietary and tobacco
salivary protein film) and to their deposition products chromogens. It becomes more evident
onto the enamel surface (Figs. 6.11 and 6.12). in enamel defects (i.e., fluorosis, dental caries,
There are two different chromogen types: (1) and enamel cracks, hypoplasia, and hypocalcifi-
large organic molecules that have conjugated cation) and in the porous surface of exposed den-
double bonds in their chemical structure and (2) tin [5–7] (Fig. 6.13).
78 V. Salgado
Fig. 6.14 Intrinsic tooth discoloration related to inher- 6.2.1.1 Hydrogen Peroxide
ited disorders that occur after to tooth eruption: element
11 with history of dental trauma. Situation after 3 years of In general, the bleaching mechanism with perox-
endodontic treatment and patient’s report of progressively ides is considered to be oxidation, although the
darkening intensification. Yellowish/orangewish staining process is not well understood. Hydrogen perox-
due endodontic products oxidation ide is a highly reactive molecule with low molec-
ular weight. It diffuses into and through the
Some restorative materials may have an effect enamel to reach the enamel dentine junction and
on tooth color, as some used for root canal treat- dentin regions, reacting with the organic mole-
ment as eugenol, phenolic compounds, and poly- cules, oxidizing the double bonds in conjugated
antibiotic pastes, which contain pigments that chains and cleaving them. The reaction process
lead to dentin discoloration (Fig. 6.14). Some forms a number of different active oxygen spe-
amalgam alloys may lead to dark grey discolor- cies depending on conditions, including tempera-
ation of dentin due to tin and mercury penetration ture, pH, light activation, and presence of
in dentinal tubules [8]. transition metals [10, 11].
There are a number of methods and approaches Fig. 6.15 At-home bleaching: initial situation. Face
that have been described in the literature for photography
bleaching of vital teeth with variation in different
agents, concentrations, times of applications,
product formats, application modes, and light
activation [11]. Vital teeth can be bleached at
home using dentist-dispensed or over-the-counter
products, and/or in the dental office by profes-
sional application products.
Fig. 6.18 At-home bleaching: individual custom-fitted Fig. 6.21 At-home bleaching: final situation. Smile
bleaching trays over plaster models photography
Fig. 6.19 At-home bleaching: bleaching trays test to Fig. 6.22 At-home bleaching: final situation. Face
check their adaption and if any sharp edges bother the photography
tongue and cheeks
different forms as gum shields, strips, and paint- (Figs. 6.31 and 6.32). Then, a gingival barrier
on gels. Usually, it requires two daily applica- must be applied on the gingival margins of the
tions by 2 weeks approximately [10, 13, 20]. dental crowns and then photoactivated. Therefore,
the bleaching agent should be applied to the teeth
6.2.2.2 In-Office Bleaching of Vital labial surface, according to the manufacturer’s
Teeth instructions.
High concentrations of peroxide agents are used The bleaching gels may be further activated by
for professional in-office bleaching of vital teeth, light, despite the irrelevance of light activation in
also known as power bleaching. It can result in
significant whitening after just one professional
application, but it requires multiple appointments
for optimum whitening results. For vital teeth,
hydrogen peroxide at 25–35%, or carbamide per-
oxide at 35%, are used in short periods of time,
between 20 and 40 min of application (Figs. 6.23,
6.24, 6.25, 6.26, 6.27, 6.28, 6.29 and 6.30).
Before application of bleaching gel, the soft
tissues should be protected. First, it should be
selected an effective lip retractor that also pro-
tects the tongue and cheeks from contact with the
bleaching gel. A sliced sucker or bite block can
be used to restrain dental occlusion and retract Fig. 6.23 In-office bleaching: initial situation. Face
the tongue if the lip retractor cannot promote this photography
a b
Fig. 6.24 In-office bleaching: initial situation. Smile photography—front (a), right (b), and left (c)
82 V. Salgado
a b
Fig. 6.25 In-office bleaching: initial situation. Intraoral photography and color measurement for incisors (a) and
canines (b)
Fig. 6.26 In-office bleaching: soft tissues protection with Fig. 6.28 In-office bleaching: bubble formation into the
tongue, chicks, and lips retractor and gingival barrier bleaching gel during bleaching reaction
application
a b
Fig. 6.29 In-office bleaching: final situation after three appointments: intraoral photography and color measurement
for incisors (a) and canines (b)
a b
Fig. 6.30 In-office bleaching: final situation: Smile photography—front (a), right (b), and left (c)
After the access to the pulp chamber of end- endodontic sealing material. Therefore, the
odontic treated teeth, the sealing material should bleaching agent is placed into the pulp chamber,
be removed close to 3 mm in an apical direction cover with a cotton pellet, and then with a provi-
beyond the clinical crown height to create a space sory restorative material.
for cervical sealing and exposes the dentinal The lower the bleaching agent pH, the higher
tubules directed towards the cervical region of the risk of external cervical root resorption.
the tooth (Figs. 6.9, 6.32, 6.33, 6.34, 6.35, 6.36, Although the isolated use of sodium perborate may
6.37 and 6.38). Then, a 2 mm base of glass- be a slower process, it is potentially less destructive
ionomer cement should be applied to protect the to the tooth due to its alkaline pH and hence safer.
84 V. Salgado
Fig. 6.31 Use of sliced sucker as tongue retractor and to Fig. 6.34 Non-vital bleaching: protection of endodontic
restrain dental occlusion sealing material with a 2 mm base of glass-ionomer
cement
Fig. 6.32 Use of bite block as tongue retractor and to Fig. 6.35 Non-vital bleaching: application of bleaching gel
restrain dental occlusion
Fig. 6.33 Non-vital bleaching: after endodontic treat- Fig. 6.36 Non-vital bleaching: covering the bleaching
ment, removal of endodontic sealing material close to gel with a cotton pellet
3 mm in an apical direction beyond the clinical crown
height to create a space for cervical sealing and exposes
the dentinal tubules directed towards the cervical region
of the tooth
6 Bleaching Procedures 85
ments; while the subjective method consists of shade guide was proposed, adding three new tabs
the visual comparison between teeth and shade for bleached teeth 0M1, 0M2, and 0M3 [32].
guides [30]. The tooth whitening effect can be The Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER (Vita
evaluated both visually and instrumentally. Zahnfabrik) is a cross-section of Toothguide
However, the visual method is the most used due 3D-MASTER (Vita Zahnfabrik) with 15 tabs and
its simplicity and reduced cost. a linear arrangement from the highest (0M1) to
The color of teeth is mainly subjectively mea- the lowest (5M3) value (Fig. 6.40). It contains 8
sured by the visual comparison method using a original Toothguide 3D-MASTER tabs and 7
tab from paper, colored porcelain, or acrylic resin interpolated tabs, included to bridge large color
shade guides [26]. These guides are made of a set differences among middle tab (M2) in different
of shade tabs intended to cover the range of col- groups. The lightest part of the Bleachedguide
ors present in human teeth. For tooth whitening 3D-MASTER exhibits subtle color gradation
monitoring, dental shade guides should be used with several tabs lighter than the lightest tab of
to follow the color change. Visual evaluation is Vitapan Classical (B1) [33].
performed by registering the tab that most closely There are other value-arranged shade guides
matches the tooth shade throughout the whiten- exclusively designed for tooth whitening moni-
ing treatment period. toring as the R-20 and R-27 (Vakker Dental) with
20 and 27 tabs, respectively (Fig. 6.41). However,
6.3.2.1 Shade Guides for Tooth no research data is available in the literature
Whitening Monitoring about their use for shade matching in Dentistry.
In worldwide clinical practice, the most com- There are several shade guides made from
monly used dental shade guide is the Vitapan paper, available to purchase by regular consum-
Classical (Vita Zahnfabrik). As mentioned in ers (non-dentists) with different color and white-
Chap. 3, the color range of this shade guide is ness gradations. Its use for tooth whitening
divided into four different hue groups designated monitoring should not be encouraged by clini-
by A, B, C, and D letters, representing reddish- cians due to the paper perishability, color differ-
brown for A hue, reddish-yellow for B hue, gray- ences among shade guides due to printing errors,
ish for C hue, and reddish-gray for D hue. For inadequate flat surface of the tabs, or even due to
each hue group, there are different tabs differenti- the absence of detachable tabs.
ated by an Arabic number ranging from 1 to 4,
with different chromas and values. The higher the 6.3.2.2 Visual Color Measurement
number, the higher chroma and the lower the During the tooth whitening monitoring, color
value. For tooth whitening monitoring, it is rec- measurement should be performed in order to
ommended to rearrange the tabs according to the follow the color change. As mentioned in Chap.
value, from the highest (B1) to the lowest (C4) 3, color from any object, as the tooth and shade
(Fig. 6.39) [31]. Recently, a modification for this guide tab, is directly influenced by illumination.
Fig. 6.41 Tooth whitening monitoring: value-arranged R-20 bleaching shade guide
Therefore, it is important to place the tab at an dardized photographs is necessary to show the
equal level with teeth to get the same amount of patient the treatment evolution.
illumination. A photographic protocol is suggested for the
beginning and for the end of tooth whitening: (1)
6.3.2.3 Photographic Register full-face smiling photo; (2) face smiling photo
Taking photographs in the beginning and during with dental shade guide placement just below the
the curse of tooth whitening treatment is strongly smile; smile photos in (3) front, (4) right and left
recommended due to different reasons. (5) sides; (6) and (7) intraoral photos of upper
Sometimes, patients may be demotivated with anterior teeth over a black background with the
the treatment due to self-perception of no effi- tab placement that most closely matches the
cacy. So, beyond registering the color change actual color of the upper central incisors (6) and
throughout the whitening period, taking stan- upper canines (7).
88 V. Salgado
During the whitening progress monitoring, Moreover, the residual oxygen present in dental
the same intraoral photos can also be taken i.e., tissues after the bleaching process decreases the
before-after an in-office power bleaching bond strength to enamel and dentin, because the
appointment and at each at-home whitening con- oxygen inhibits the monomer polymerization that
trol appointments. cures via a free-radical mechanism [38, 39]. For
this reason, it is recommended to delay at least
1 week after the tooth whitening before place-
6.4 Considerations to Bleaching ment/replacement of direct restorations in order
Related to Direct Restorative to the residual oxygen may have sufficient time
Approaches to leach from the dental hard tissues. Optimal
bonding to pre-bleached dental hard tissue could
The bleaching procedures may negatively affect be achieved after a period of about 3 weeks [35].
the marginal seal of restorations in both pre- and
post-operative periods. Meticulously clinical
examination must be performed before applica- References
tion of peroxide agents. Unsatisfactory restora-
tions need to be repaired or replaced prior to 1. Watts A, Addy M. Tooth discolouration and
staining: a review of the literature. Br Dent J.
bleaching in order to achieve an optimal seal of 2001;190(6):309–16.
the pulp chamber, reducing the risk of adverse 2. Joiner A, Luo W. Tooth colour and whiteness: a
effects [34]. review. J Dent. 2017;67S:S3–S10.
Considering the bleaching of restored teeth, 3. Algarni AA, Ungar PS, Lippert F, Martínez-Mier EA,
Eckert GJ, González-Cabezas C, Hara AT. Trend-
the peroxide agents react to the resin-based com- analysis of dental hard-tissue conditions as function
posite’ components and produce color and sur- of tooth age. J Dent. 2018;74:107–12.
face alterations. They increase the elution of 4. Epple M, Meyer F, Enax J. A critical review of mod-
unpolymerized monomers, additives, and other ern concepts for teeth whitening. Dent J (Basel).
2019;7(3):79.
organic components oxidation [35, 36]. At the 5. Ardu S, Benbachir N, Stavridakis M, Dietschi D,
same time, they are increasing the lightness and Krejci I, Feilzer A. A combined chemo-mechanical
decreasing the chroma for the natural tooth; they approach for aesthetic management of superficial
act in the opposite way on the resin-based com- enamel defects. Br Dent J. 2009;206(4):205–8.
6. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Masking of labial enamel
posite materials, accentuating the color mismatch white spot lesions by resin infiltration—a clinical
between the two structures. Therefore, composite report. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(9):713–8.
restorations in anterior teeth often need to be 7. Attal JP, Atlan A, Denis M, Vennat E, Tirlet G. White
replaced after the tooth whitening treatment [35]. spots on enamel: treatment protocol by superficial or
deep infiltration (part 2). Int Orthod. 2014;12(1):1–31.
During the whitening treatment, teeth get an 8. Calazans FS, Dias KR, Miranda MS. Modified tech-
increase in lightness through the process and reach nique for vital bleaching of teeth pigmented by amal-
a maximum lightness regardless of the concentra- gam: a case report. Oper Dent. 2011;36(6):678–82.
tion of the agent or contact time used. With the 9. Joiner A. Whitening toothpastes: a review of the lit-
erature. J Dent. 2010;38(Suppl 2):e17–24.
peroxide agent removal, dental rehydration occurs, 10. Joiner A. The bleaching of teeth: a review of the lit-
and the teeth will get a decrease in lightness due to erature. J Dent. 2006;34(7):412–9.
light absorption by water into the dental tissues. 11. Joiner A. Review of the effects of peroxide on enamel
So, for restorative approaches after tooth whiten- and dentine properties. J Dent. 2007;35(12):889–96.
12. Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Pameijer CH,
ing, it is necessary to wait for at least 10 days Somma F. Nonvital tooth bleaching: a review of
before measuring the real tooth color [37]. the literature and clinical procedures. J Endod.
The peroxide agents oxidizing effect alters the 2008;34(4):394–407.
organic matrix of enamel and dentin, impairing a 13. Date RF, Yue J, Barlow AP, Bellamy PG, Prendergast
MJ, Gerlach RW. Delivery, substantivity and clinical
strong and stable bond between the composite response of a direct application percarbonate tooth
applied and the superficial etched enamel layer. whitening film. Am J Dent. 2003;16:3B–8B.
6 Bleaching Procedures 89
14. Haywood VB, Heymann HO. Nightguard vital 27. Reno EA, Sunberg RJ, Block RP, Bush RD. The influ-
bleaching. Quintessence Int. 1989;20:173–6. ence of lip/gum color on subject perception of tooth
15. Haywood VB. History, safety, and effectiveness of color. J Dent Res. 2000;79:381.
current bleaching techniques and applications of the 28. Sharma V, Punia V, Khandelwal M, Punia S,
nightguard vital bleaching technique. Quintessence Lakshmana R. A study of relationship between skin
Int. 1992;23(7):471–88. color and tooth shade value in population of Udaipur,
16. Mokhlis GR, Matis BA, Cochran MA, Eckert GJ. A Rajasthan. Int J Dent Clin. 2010;2:26–9.
clinical evaluation of carbamide peroxide and hydro- 29. Grosofsky A, Adkins S, Bastholm R, Meyer L,
gen peroxide whitening agents during daytime use. J Krueger L, Meyer J, Torma P. Tooth color: effects
Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(9):1269–77. on judgments of attractiveness and age. Percept Mot
17. Kihn PW, Barnes DM, Romberg E, Peterson K. A Skills. 2003;96:43–8.
clinical evaluation of 10 percent vs. 15 percent carb- 30. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color
amide peroxide tooth-whitening agents. J Am Dent matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical
Assoc. 2000;131(10):1478–84. and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38(Suppl 2):e2–16.
18. Matis BA, Wang Y, Eckert GJ, Cochran MA, Jiang 31. Browning WD. Use of shade guides for color mea-
T. Extended bleaching of tetracycline-stained teeth: a surement in tooth-bleaching studies. J Esthet Restor
5-year study. Oper Dent. 2006;31(6):643–51. Dent. 2003;15(s1):S13–20.
19. Matis BA, Wang G, Matis JI, Cook NB, Eckert 32. Paravina RD. Performance assessment of dental shade
GJ. White diet: is it necessary during tooth whiten- guides. J Dent. 2009;37(Suppl 1):e15–20.
ing? Oper Dent. 2015;40(3):235–40. 33. Paravina RD. New shade guide for tooth whiten-
20. Matis BA, Cochran M, Wang G, Franco M, Eckert GJ, ing monitoring: visual assessment. J Prosthet Dent.
Carlotti RJ, Bryan C. A clinical evaluation of bleach- 2008;99:178–84.
ing using whitening wraps and strips. Oper Dent. 34. Gokäy O, Yilmaz F, Akin S, Tuncbilek M, Ertan
2005;30(5):588–92. R. Penetration of the pulp chamber by bleaching
21. Bernardon JK, Sartori N, Ballarin A, Perdigão J, agents in teeth restored with various restorative mate-
Lopes GC, Baratieri LN. Clinical performance of vital rials. J Endod. 2000;26:92–4.
bleaching techniques. Oper Dent. 2010;35(1):3–10. 35. Attin T, Hannig C, Wiegand A, Attin R. Effect of
22. Nutting EB, Poe GS. Chemical bleaching of discol- bleaching on restorative materials and restorations—a
ored endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin N Am. systematic review. Dent Mater. 2004;20(9):852–61.
1967;16:655–62. 36. Della Bona A, Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Cardona JC,
23. Bizhang M, Heiden A, Blunck U, Zimmer S, Seemann Paravina RD, Perez MM. Influence of bleaching and
R, Roulet JF. Intracoronal bleaching of discolored aging procedures on color and whiteness of dental
non-vital teeth. Oper Dent. 2003;28(4):334–40. composites. Oper Dent. 2019;44(6):648–58.
24. Harrington GW, Natkin E. External resorption asso- 37. Kihn PW. Vital tooth whitening. Dent Clin N Am.
ciated with bleaching of pulpless teeth. J Endod. 2007;51(2):319–31.
1979;5:344–8. 38. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen
25. Höfel L, Lange M, Jacobsen T. Beauty and the teeth: inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J
perception of tooth color and its influence on the over- Dent Res. 1990;69:1652–8.
all judgment of facial attractiveness. Int J Periodontics 39. Turkun M, Turkun LS. Effect of nonvital bleach-
Restor Dent. 2007;27(4):349–57. ing with 10% carbamide peroxide on sealing abil-
26. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. ity of resin composite restorations. Int Endod J.
J Dent. 2004;32(Suppl 1):3–12. 2004;37:52–60.
Biomimetics of the Natural Tooth
Using Composites
7
Dayane Oliveira and Vinícius Salgado
Fig. 7.1 Clinical case of one-layer build-up technique: Fig. 7.4 Clinical case of two-layers build-up technique—
initial situation classical two-layering: initial situation
Fig. 7.2 Clinical case of one-layer build-up technique: Fig. 7.5 Clinical case of two-layers build-up technique—
color stratification planning classical two-layering: color stratification planning
Fig. 7.8 Clinical case of two-layers build-up technique— Fig. 7.11 Clinical case of multi-layer build-up tech-
natural two-layering: color stratification planning. nique—classical three-layers: color stratification
(Photography courtesy of Dr. Monique Solon and Dr. planning
Thais Soares)
Fig. 7.12 Clinical case of multi-layer build-up tech- Fig. 7.15 Clinical case of multi-layer build-up tech-
nique—classical three-layers: final situation nique—modern three-layers: final situation. (Photography
courtesy of Dr. André Reis)
7.1.3.3 Four or More Layers It is a fact that the ability to replace the original
It comprises a set of four or more different morphology of the lost tooth structure is essential
opaque/translucent masses. First, the use of high- to reestablish function, health, and esthetics.
opacity materials, named as “dentin” shades, fol- However, an optimal understanding of the tooth
7 Biomimetics of the Natural Tooth Using Composites 95
Fig. 7.19 Example of correct shade selection with: (a) correct layering placement and (b) incorrect layering place-
ment, and color matching
the Omnichroma (Tokuyama) (Fig. 7.22a). The ture as the multi-layer build-up technique.
Omnichroma composite also offer a blocker However, they do have a high clinical color
shade to be used over dark discolored tooth matching acceptance [9–12]. It is worthwhile to
structures and facilitating correct color match- mention that these composites are also helpful in
ing (Fig. 7.22b). simplifying color selection and minimizing clini-
The literature shows these composites cannot cal errors when the one-layer build-up technique
perfectly blend with the surrounding tooth struc- is indicated.
7 Biomimetics of the Natural Tooth Using Composites 97
a b
Fig. 7.20 Conventional composites: (a) Estelite Omega (Tokuyama); (b) Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M); and Miris 2
(Coltene). (Photography courtesy of Tokuyama Dental, 3M and Coltene)
a b
Fig. 7.22 Chameleon effect composite: (a) Omnichroma (Tokuyama) and its (b) blocker. (Photography courtesy of
Tokuyama Dental)
Fig. 7.23 (a) Mock-up technique prior. (b) Final restorative technique
7 Biomimetics of the Natural Tooth Using Composites 99
a b
c d
e f
a b
Fig. 7.26 Schematic drawings of modern three-layering tive carious lesion on the neck following the contour of
technique examples: (a) using white effect to mock a the gum line; (c) using blue effect to mock opalescence of
hypoplasia defect; (b) using white effect to mock an inac- incisal halo
7 Biomimetics of the Natural Tooth Using Composites 101
References
1. Dietschi D, Fahl N Jr. Shading concepts and layering
techniques to master direct anterior composite resto-
rations: an update. Br Dent J. 2016;221(12):765–71.
2. Dietschi D. Layering concepts in anterior composite
restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(1):71–80.
3. Bayindir F, Gozalo-Diaz D, Kim-Pusateri S, Wee
Fig. 7.27 Schematic drawing of classical four or more- AG. Incisal translucency of vital natural unre-
layers technique stored teeth: a clinical study. J Esthet Restor Dent.
2012;24(5):335–43.
4. Fahl N Jr. Single-shaded direct anterior composite res-
torations: a simplified technique for enhanced results.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(2):150–4.
5. Dietschi D. Free-hand bonding in the esthetic treat-
ment of anterior teeth: creating the illusion. J Esthet
Dent. 1997;9(4):156–64.
6. Ardu S, Krejci I. Biomimetic direct composite strati-
fication technique for the restoration of anterior teeth.
(Erratum in: Quintessence Int. 2006 May;37(5):408).
Quintessence Int. 2006;37(3):167–74.
7. Dietschi D, Ardu S, Krejci I. A new shading concept
based on natural tooth color applied to direct compos-
ite restorations. Quintessence Int. 2006;37(2):91–102.
8. Fahl N Jr. Achieving ultimate anterior esthetics with a
new microhybrid composite. Compend Contin Educ
Dent Suppl. 2000;26:4–13.
9. Abreu JLB, Sampaio CS, Jalkh EBB, Hirata
R. Analysis of the color matching of universal resin
Fig. 7.28 Schematic drawing of classical four or more-
composites in anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent.
layers technique including “effect” material
2021;33(2):269–76.
10. Iyer RS, Babani VR, Yaman P, Dennison J. Color
drawing is focused on where the dentin, body, matching using instrumental and visual methods for
single, group, and multi-shade composite resins. J
enamel, and translucent shades will be placed, as Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(2):394–400.
well as how the dentin is shaped following the 11. Sanchez NP, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Instrumental
morphology of the natural dentin and its charac- and visual evaluation of the color adjustment
teristics (Fig. 7.27). potention of resin composites. J Esthet Rest Dent.
2019;31(5):465–70.
It is important to point out that “effect” mate- 12. Optical behavior of one-shaded resin-based compos-
rials can also be applied in this technique. In ites. Dent Mater. 2021;37(5):840–8.
these cases, the schematic drawing should also
Finishing and Polishing
8
Alex J. Delgado
8.1 Finishing and Polishing bide burs, (2) diamond burs, (3) coated aluminum
Importance oxide disc, (4) rubber impregnated rubber cups,
points, and discs, (5) interproximal strips, (6)
Finishing and polishing composite restorations is polishing brushes, wheels, and felts, and (7) pol-
an essential procedure for the longevity of the ishing pastes. The most studied and common
restoration and the tooth [1, 2]. A well-contoured, instruments for contouring a restoration are the
finished, and polished restoration will promote fluted carbides, diamond burs, coated aluminum
oral health, serve functionality, and preserve discs, and impregnated rubber cups, points, and
esthetics. Finishing is the gross reduction of the discs. These finishing and polishing instruments
restorative material to obtain an anatomical con- are often offered in different degrees of abrasive-
tour of the restoration and make the margins ness, come in sets, and should be used in the
undetectable, while polishing makes the surface proper sequence, working gradually from the
smooth and lustrous [3, 4] (Figs. 8.1 and 8.2). course to the finest [1, 2]. The clinician must also
Finishing and polishing goals are to obtain the take into general consideration factors such as the
desired anatomy, proper occlusion, and function- type of handpiece (friction grip or latch), the
ality, reduce roughness, and increase surface rotation per minute recommended by the manu-
smoothness to recreate nature. facture, and the pressure applied to each of these
Appropriate instrumentation must be selected instruments. Also, local considerations must be
according to the specific surface being contoured considered, for instance, the grit of abrasiveness,
[5]. Lack of proper finishing and polishing proce- the number of blades, if the instrument is dispos-
dures can compromise marginal integrity, leading able or if it should be in a dry or wet condition [6,
to staining and discoloration of the restoration, 7]. It is also worth mentioning that it is crucial to
gingival inflammation or irritation, and plaque know the effect of polishing direction on the mar-
accumulation that could result in recurrent caries ginal adaptation of the restoration. A study dem-
(Fig. 8.3) [1]. onstrated a significant difference in the marginal
Instrumentation for finishing and polishing adaptation when polishing is accomplished from
available to the clinicians include (1) fluted car- resin-based composites to tooth structure instead
of tooth to resin [8].
A. J. Delgado (*) Obtaining an anatomical contoured of the res-
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College toration will provide better oral health preventing
of Dentistry, University of Florida, gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation
Gainesville, FL, USA because the proper anatomy will help the spillway,
e-mail: [email protected]
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 103
D. Oliveira (ed.), Color Science and Shade Selection in Operative Dentistry,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99173-9_8
104 A. J. Delgado
Figs. 8.1 and 8.2 Clinical case before and after finishing and polishing of the composite restoration. (Photography
courtesy of Dr. Dayane Oliveira et al.)
Fig. 8.4 Steps for finishing and polishing resin-based composite restorations
Diamond burs consist of a metal-based blank sur- 8.3.2.1 Fluted Carbide Finishing Burs
face coated with powdered diamond abrasive vs. Diamond Finishing Burs
particles bonded by a metallic adhesive. Diamond The clinician must understand the difference
is the harder cutting material in Dentistry, and it between both instruments. Fluted carbides burs
is superior in its cutting efficiency over other fin- remove restorative material by slicing or shaving
ishing and polishing instruments. Unlike fluted away the composite while diamond burs grind
carbide burs, diamonds rely on the grinding by away the material. In the end, both instruments
abrasiveness particles rather than blades cutting can achieve a smooth surface.
action. Diamonds’ particles can vary in size and
shape. Thus, allowing finishing and polishing 8.3.2.2 Finishing Burs Shapes and Their
results in a shorter period. However, their life Applications
span is shorter than fluted carbide burs. The dia- There are several bur shapes accordingly to
mond particles eventually are flaked off from the different applications. The most used ones are the
metal-based blank surface due to the friction over taper finishing, the flame, and the football. The
time. Coarse diamond burs have a range of taper finishing is mainly indicated for flat surfaces,
50–150 μm, while medium grits are usually including facial and margin areas. The flame is
40 μm, fine grits are 25–30 μm, the extra-fine are mainly indicated for occlusal areas. The football is
usually 12–15 μm, and superfine 7–8 μm mainly indicated for occlusal (pointed football)
(Fig. 8.6). The clinical performance of diamond and cingulum areas (round football).
burs depends on the size and shape distribution of
the diamond particles, but its hardness is suffi-
cient for polishing direct and indirect materials 8.3.3 Impregnated Aluminum
[3, 14–16]. The manufactures recommend using Oxide Discs
gentle wiping strokes with these instruments and
with water irrigation, preferably, to avoid heat. Impregnated aluminum oxide discs are fabricated
Some of the most common diamond burs com- by securing abrasive particles of a chemical com-
mercially available in the market are the ET pound of aluminum and oxygen to a flexible
8 Finishing and Polishing 107
That is why it is crucial to understand how the marginal integrity of resin-based composite and resin-
modified glass ionomer restoration. J Esthet Restor
light is reflected by different types of composites. Dent. 2015;27(4):184–93.
Still, the light reflection is different when you 7. Maresca C, Pimenta LA, Heymann HO, Ziemiecki
have texture on the surface, and it is essential to TL, Ritter AV. Effect of finishing instrumentation on
assess the light reflection and propagation after the marginal integrity of resin-based composite resto-
rations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010;22(2):104–12.
the final polishing. Adding texture to the restora- 8. St-Pierre L, Bergeron C, Qian F, Hernández MM,
tion may improve this phenomenon. Kolker JL, Cobb DS, Vargas MA. Effect of polish-
ing direction on the marginal adaptation of com-
posite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent.
2013;25(2):125–38.
8.4.2 Surface Texture 9. Ash MM. Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology, and
occlusion. 10th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015.
Younger teeth have significant characterization, 10. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. ADA Council
while older patients have less anatomy and tex- on dental benefit programs. J Am Dent Assoc.
1998;129(11):1627–8.
ture because of the gradually physiological wear. 11. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Marginal adaptation. J Dent.
In younger patients, teeth carry wavelike grooves 1993;21(5):265–73.
in the cervical and mid area from the mesial line 12. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares
angle to the distal line angle called perikymata. M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus
compomer/composite restorations in posterior pri-
These stripes never cross each other, and they are mary and permanent teeth: findings from the New
circumferential, and they will create a great deal England Children’s amalgam trial. J Am Dent Assoc.
on the reflection of the light [19]. 2007;138(6):763–72.
13. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T,
Leitão J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for fail-
ure of amalgam versus composite posterior restora-
References tions placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent
Assoc. 2007;138(6):775–83.
1. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finish- 14. Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa
ing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin N H, Rikuta A, Ando S. Influence of polishing duration
Am. 1998;42(4):613–27. on surface roughness of resin composites. J Oral Sci.
2. Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in 2005;47(1):21–5.
restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent 15. Türkün LS, Türkün M. The effect of one-step polishing
Clin N Am. 2007;51(2):379–97. system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin
3. Anunsavice K, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science composite materials. Oper Dent. 2004;29(2):203–11.
of dental materials. 12th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 16. Powers JM, Sakaguhi RL. Craig’s restorative dental
2012. materials. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 231.
4. Oliveira DCRS, Oliveira LV, Castro NA, Paulillo 17. Whitehead SA, Wilson NH. The nature and effects of
LAMS, Pereira GDS. Esthetic results using compos- composite finishing pastes. J Dent. 1989;17(5):234–
ite resin restorations: nature-like results. Clin Inte J 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90174-7.
Braz Dent. 2011;7(2):1780184. 18. Tjan AH, Chan CA. The polishability of posterior
5. Ritter AV, Boushell L, Walter R. Sturdevant’s art and composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(2):138–46.
science of operative dentistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 19. Maia RR, Oliveira D, D'Antonio T, Qian F, Skiff
2018. F. Double-layer build-up technique: laser evaluation
6. Delgado AJ, Ritter AV, Donovan TE, Ziemiecki T, of light propagation in dental substrates and dental
Heymann HO. Effect of finishing techniques on the composites. Int J Esthet Dent. 2018;13(4):538–49.
Color Mismatch Between
the Restoration and the Natural
9
Tooth Over Time
9.1 Color Change in Resin teeth) and esthetic dental restoration with mini-
Composite Restorations mal loss of dental tissues [4]. With these advances
has come a greater demand for esthetic-related
Resin composites represent a significant advance treatment, which has guided the development of
in the field of restorative, conservative, and dental materials in recent years. For example,
esthetic dentistry and today are the most-used resin composites with different degrees of opac-
direct material worldwide [1]. This has not always ity [5] and simplified optical characteristics facil-
been the case, however, and early problems asso- itate improved clinician ability to match the resin
ciated with the adhesion process, unsatisfactory composite to the natural teeth, as is seen in uni-
physicochemical properties, high polymerization versal color system technologies [6].
shrinkage, and excessive wear have necessitated While the aforementioned advancements have
an evolution in resin composite manufacturing allowed for greater clinical applications, over
techniques [2]. Miletic [3] reported that the sig- time resin composite restorations experience
nificant advances in resin composite technology deterioration of texture and gloss as a result of a
encompass modifications in (a) the curing path- complex degradation process [7] (Figs. 9.1–9.3).
way (between the mid-1960s and late-1970s), (b) While early in the development of dental tech-
the filler particles (between the late-1970s and nologies the primary goal was to achieve a resto-
mid-2000s) and, recently, (c) the resin matrix ration that was minimally resistant to wear and
(between the mid-2000s and mid-2010s). mechanical forces, currently the major challenge
Improvements in resin composite technology is the search for maintenance of the esthetic com-
have made possible a wide variety of additional ponents of dental materials. This chapter will
applications, particularly in cosmetic dentistry address intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated
(e.g., closing diastemas, transforming conoid with resin composite discoloration, with the goal
of reducing the need for early replacement.
L. F. J. Schneider (*)
School of Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University,
Niterói, RJ, Brazil 9.1.1 Discoloration Due to Intrinsic
Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Factors
e-mail: [email protected]
L. M. A. Cavalcante 9.1.1.1 Monomers
School of Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, The color changes arising from the intrinsic pro-
Niterói, RJ, Brazil cesses of resin composites are commonly associ-
e-mail: [email protected]
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 111
D. Oliveira (ed.), Color Science and Shade Selection in Operative Dentistry,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99173-9_9
112 L. F. J. Schneider and L. M. A. Cavalcante
ated with the curing initiator system. Chemical have been shown to influence the optical charac-
alterations in the resin matrix can generate a yellow- teristics of composites [9]. Multiple studies have
ing effect in restorations, primarily due to the pos- reported that vinyl-groups can react with oxygen
sible degradation of carbon–carbon double bonds in to form pigmented peroxides, a process that is
the unreacted monomers (Figs. 9.4 and 9.5) [8]. accelerated by UV irradiation [10]. In this way,
Thus, the chemical structure of the monomer the composition of the resin matrix may influ-
and the physical characteristics of the three- ence physical property degradation and color sta-
dimensional polymeric structure are factors that bility of dental resin composites. Fonseca et al.
9 Color Mismatch Between the Restoration and the Natural Tooth Over Time 113
evaluated as total replacements for amine that the selection of the material may affect the
components and produced materials with high color stability of the restoration. Studies have
polymerization ability and color stability [40]. shown that lighter and more translucent resins are
The same research group has designed and tested associated with greater color change [35, 45, 46].
alternative hydrogen donors for camphorquinone
and found excellent photobleaching effects and 9.1.3.2 Material Handling
color stability [41–43]. Although resin composites may inherently con-
Amine-free materials are currently available tain small amounts of micro-bubbles due to the
for clinicians in the form of dual-cure resin manufacturing process [47], it is during the
cement and have demonstrated superior color sta- manipulation of the composite that the highest
bility compared to traditional cement that is for- risk of introduction of large amounts of air inside
mulated with high concentrations of amine the material occurs. This not only causes struc-
components [44]. In this study, however, it was tural defects and subsequent mechanical failure
evident that other factors can have a more signifi- but also reduces the polymerization potential and
cant effect on color stability, including the acts as a reservoir for pigment accumulation by
amount of filler present in the system. One must absorption (which will be discussed in the fol-
also consider that commercially available materi- lowing sections). Thus, the clinician should be
als employ UV-light stabilizers, which have an aware that the maintenance of the optical proper-
excellent ability to reduce the potential discolor- ties of the restorative material is affected by the
ation caused by the amine components. manner in which each resin increment is manipu-
lated (Fig. 9.12).
During the process of sculpting the restora-
9.1.2 Discoloration Due to Extrinsic tion, an increase in the viscosity of the material,
Factors and consequently the inclusion of air bubbles,
may occur due to exposure of the material to
The scientific literature on extrinsic factors asso- light. For this reason, the clinician must avoid
ciated with color change in resin composites exposing the increments for prolonged periods to
commonly involves the long-term degradation ambient light or worse, to light from the
process associated with pigment absorption. reflector.
Color changes can be caused by the absorption of Modeling liquids are commonly employed in
solvents of the organic matrix and/or the increased clinical practice to improve the sculptability of
surface roughness that occurs for a number of restorative materials (Fig. 9.13). Several studies
reasons. However, it is necessary to consider that have been conducted to determine whether this
a series of events carried out during clinical prac- practice has any impact (positive or negative) on
tice can be instrumental in the maintenance of
optical characteristics in the long term. For this
reason, this section will address the extrinsic fac-
tors, separated into immediate (originating from
clinical practice) and long-term factors, associ-
ated with material degradation.
cause excessive wear of both the tooth structure discrepancy between the tooth and restoration, it
and the restored area when used incorrectly. is a possibility and thus necessary that the patient
be informed that this may occur and that a subse-
quent replacement of the restoration(s) may be
9.2.2 Periodic Professional Cleaning required for esthetic reasons. Furthermore,
although a bleaching effect may occur on the res-
Periodic appointments are important to monitor toration due to the removal of pigments deposited
the patient’s oral health and to check the condi- both on the external surface and inside the mass,
tion of previously placed restorations. This may studies indicate that there may be a subsequent
include occlusal adjustment, contouring, or the increase in the darkening of the restoration due to
need for a one-time addition of resin composite. an increase in its roughness after exposure to a
In these appointments, rotary instruments such as bleaching gel [87–89]. Moraes et al. [90] raised
Robinson brushes, rubber cups, or specific jets the question regarding potential bleaching effects
are commonly employed so that effective clean- on the surface integrity of exposed substrates,
ing can be accomplished in the upper and lower particularly with regard to the application of a
arches in a short period of time. Studies have highly concentrated solution. Although direct
been conducted to determine the effect of differ- clinical effects depend on the actual in vivo con-
ent cleaning methods, with special attention to ditions, bleaching procedures should not be car-
those based on air-polishing powders, on the sur- ried out indiscriminately when restorations are
face properties of resin composites. Sodium present.
bicarbonate, glycine, and erythritol have been
tested [80–85]. Despite conflicting results and
dependence on the material being evaluated, 9.3.2 Repolishing vs. Replacing
some studies point to glycine as being less harm-
ful to the surface of restorations [83, 86]. As seen throughout this chapter, resin composites
Yap et al. [81] evaluated the effect of different undergo a constant degradation process in the
cleaning methods on the surface of multiple oral environment that may vary in speed and
direct-use restorative materials and suggested intensity depending on aspects related to both the
that it may be necessary to perform repolishing of patient (behavioral, physiological) and the clini-
the restored surfaces due to a potential increase in cian. Thus, the decision regarding what should be
roughness. Guller et al. [84] has provided similar done with a restoration over time needs to con-
guidance. sider both the patient’s wishes and the practitio-
ner’s experience. When considering an
esthetically unsatisfactory restoration, it is essen-
9.3 Methods to Correct tial to identify the source of the problem.
Discoloration If the origin of the problem is staining due to
external pigments (e.g., coffee, wine, etc.) accu-
9.3.1 Bleaching mulated on surfaces that have become rough over
the years, it is likely that a finishing and repolish-
Tooth whitening has become an increasingly ing procedure is sufficient to restore the mini-
accessible and routine practice in dental offices. mum conditions necessary for this restoration to
Although proven safe, questions remain regard- remain in the mouth [91]. Restorations made of
ing the effect of bleaching agents on preexisting resin composites formulated with small-sized
restorations. Thus, it is essential that patients and filler particles are likely to obtain a bright and
clinicians are aware of the unpredictable nature smooth aspect easily [10]. On the other hand, if
of whitening treatments. While it is not guaran- the discoloration occurs uniformly throughout
teed that a bleaching treatment will cause a color the restoration and at a rate that is different than
120 L. F. J. Schneider and L. M. A. Cavalcante
the remaining tooth structure, the cause is likely ites by UV-irradiation and staining food. Dent Mater.
2006;22(1):63–8.
intrinsic in origin, which would necessitate a 11. Fonseca AS, Labruna Moreira AD, de Albuquerque PP,
complete replacement. de Menezes LR, Pfeifer CS, Schneider LF. Effect of
Material fracture and secondary caries com- monomer type on the CC degree of conversion, water
prise the primary causes of failure of resin com- sorption and solubility, and color stability of model den-
tal composites. Dent Mater. 2017;33(4):394–401.
posite restorations requiring replacement. Color 12. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Color and opac-
change is little reported in the literature as a ity variations in three different resin-based com-
major cause of failure in long-term studies, posite products after water aging. Dent Mater.
though is slightly more significant in studies per- 2004;20(6):530–4.
13. Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of den-
formed on anterior teeth [92]. However, it must tal resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent
be considered that the demand for direct and indi- Mater. 1987;3(5):246–51.
rect restorations for esthetic purposes has become 14. Dart EC, Cantwell JB, Traynor JR, Jaworzyn JF,
greater in recent years and continues to be on an Nemcek J, (Invs.). Curable dental filling com-
positions. US-PS 4,110,184, Imperial Chemical
upward trajectory. As such, it is essential that Industries; 1978.
dentistry professionals be aware of the need for 15. Morlet-Savary F, Klee JE, Pfefferkorn F, Fouassier
continued development of clinical practice and JP, Lalevée J. The camphorquinone/amine and cam-
new materials to accommodate this increased phorquinone/amine/phosphine oxide derivative pho-
toinitiating systems: overview, mechanistic approach,
demand. and role of the excitation light source. Macromol
Chem Phys. 2015;216(22):2161–70.
16. Asmusen S, Arenas G, Cook WD, Vallo
C. Photobleaching of camphorquinone during polym-
References erization of dimethacrylate-based resins. Dent Mater.
2009;25(12):1603–11.
1. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent 17. Schneider LF, Pfeifer CS, Consani S, Prahl SA,
Mater. 2011;27(1):29–38. Ferracane JL. Influence of photoinitiator type on the
2. Bayne SC, Ferracane JL, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness
van Noort R. The evolution of dental materials over and yellowing of dental resin composites. Dent Mater.
the past century: silver and gold to tooth color and 2008;24(9):1169–77.
beyond. J Dent Res. 2019;98(3):257–65. 18. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Consani S, Ferracane
3. Miletic V. Development of dental composites. In: JL. Effect of co-initiator ratio on the polymer proper-
Dental composite materials for direct restorations. ties of experimental resin composites formulated with
Cham: Springer; 2018. camphorquinone and phenyl–propanedione. Dent
4. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Bahat O, Roblee R, Coachman Mater. 2009;25(3):369–75.
C, Heymann HO. Evolution of aesthetic dentistry. J 19. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Prahl SA, Pfeifer
Dent Res. 2019;98(12):1294–304. CS, Ferracane JL. Curing efficiency of dental resin
5. Ryan EA, Tam LE, McComb D. Comparative translu- composites formulated with camphorquinone or
cency of esthetic composite resin restorative materi- trimethylbenzoyl- diphenyl-phosphine oxide. Dent
als. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a84. Mater. 2012;28(4):392–7.
6. de Abreu JLB, Sampaio CS, Benalcázar Jalkh EB, 20. Brandt WC, Schneider LF, Frollini E, Correr-Sobrinho
Hirata R. Analysis of the color matching of univer- L, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of different photo-initiators
sal resin composites in anterior restorations. J Esthet and light curing units on degree of conversion of com-
Restor Dent. 2020;29:269. https://doi.org/10.1111/ posites. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(3):263–70.
jerd.12659. 21. de Oliveira DC, Ayres AP, Rocha MG, Giannini
7. Lee YK, Lu H, Oguri M, Powers JM. Changes in gloss M, Puppin Rontani RM, Ferracane JL, Sinhoreti
after simulated generalized wear of composite resins. J MA. Effect of different in vitro aging methods on
Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(4):370–6. color stability of a dental resin-based composite using
8. Ferracane JL, Moser JB, Greener EH. Ultraviolet CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color-difference formulas.
light induced yellowing of dental restorative resins. J J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(5):322–30.
Prosthet Dent. 1985;54(4):485–7. 22. Brandt WC, Consani S, Sinhoreti MAC, Cavalcante
9. Fonseca AS, Gerhardt KM, Pereira GD, Sinhoreti LMA, Schneider LF. Degree of conversion and cross-
MA, Schneider LF. Do new matrix formulations link density of resin composites formulated with dif-
improve resin composite resistance to degradation ferent photoinitiators. RFO. 2009;14(3):239–45.
processes? Braz Oral Res. 2013;27(5):410–6. 23. Moszner N, Salz U. Recent developments of new
10. Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel components for dental adhesives and composites.
G. Discoloration of facing and restorative compos- Macromol Mater Eng. 2007;292(3):245–71.
9 Color Mismatch Between the Restoration and the Natural Tooth Over Time 121
24. Park YJ, Chae KH, Rawls HR. Development of a new 37. Ganster B, Fischer UK, Moszner N, Liska R. New
photoinitiation system for dental light-cure composite photocleavable structures. IV. Acylgerman based pho-
resins. Dent Mater. 1999;15(2):120–7. toinitiator for visible light curing. Macromol Rapid
25. de Oliveira DC, Souza-Junior EJ, Dobson A, Correr Commun. 2008;29(1):57–62.
AR, Brandt WC, Sinhoreti MA. Evaluation of phenyl– 38. Vasquez B, Levenfeld B, San RJ. Role of amine activa-
propanedione on yellowing and chemical–mechanical tors on the curing parameters, properties and toxicity
properties of experimental dental resin-based materi- of acrylic bone cements. Polym Int. 1998;46:241–50.
als. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(6):555–60. 39. Shin DH, Rawls HR. Degree of conversion and color
26. Leprince JG, Hadis M, Shortall AC, Ferracane JL, stability of the light curing resin with new photoinitia-
Devaux J, Leloup G, Palin WM. Photoinitiator type tor systems. Dent Mater. 2009;25(8):1030–8.
and applicability of exposure reciprocity law in 40. Kirschner J, Szillat F, Bouzrati-Zerelli M, Becht
filled and unfilled photoactive resins. Dent Mater. JM, Klee JE, Lalevée J. Sulfinates and sulfonates
2011;27(2):157–64. as high performance co-initiators in CQ based sys-
27. Albuquerque PP, Moreira AD, Moraes RR, Cavalcante tems: towards aromatic amine-free systems for dental
LM, Schneider LF. Color stability, conversion, water restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2020;36(2):187–96.
sorption and solubility of dental composites formu- 41. Sprick E, Graff B, Becht JM, Tigges T, Neuhaus
lated with different photoinitiator systems. J Dent. K, Weber C, Lalevee J. New bio-sourced hydro-
2013;41(3):e67–72. gen donors as high performance coinitiators and
28. Randolph LD, Palin WM, Watts DC, Genet M, additives for CQ-based systems: toward aromatic
Devaux J, Leloup G, Leprince JG. The effect of ultra- amine-free photoinitiating systems. Eur Polym J.
fast photopolymerisation of experimental composites 2020;134:109794.
on shrinkage stress, network formation and pulpal 42. Sprick E, Becht JM, Tigges T, Neuhaus K, Weber
temperature rise. Dent Mater. 2014;30(11):1280–9. C, Lalevee J. Hydrogen donors to replace aromatic
29. Randolph L, Leloup G, Palin WM, Leprince amine based photoinitiating systems. Nano Select.
JG. Trapped radicals in Lucirin-TPO vs 2020;1:382–7.
camphorquinone- based dental composites. Dent 43. Sprick E, Becht JM, Graff B, Salomon JP, Tigges T,
Mater. 2013;29:45–50. Weber C, Lalevée J. New hydrogen donors for amine-
30. Salgado VE, Borba MM, Cavalcante LM, Moraes RR, free photoinitiating systems in dental materials. Dent
Schneider LF. Effect of photoinitiator combinations Mater. 2021;37(3):382–90.
on hardness, depth of cure, and color of model resin 44. Schneider LFJ, Ribeiro RB, Liberato WF, Salgado
composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(1):S41–8. VE, Moraes RR, Cavalcante LM. Curing potential
31. Bertolo MV, Moraes RC, Pfeifer C, Salgado VE, and color stability of different resin-based luting
Correr AR, Schneider LF. Influence of photoini- materials. Dent Mater. 2020;36(10):e309–15.
tiator system on physical–chemical properties of 45. Uchida H, Vaidyanathan J, Viswanadhan T,
experimental self-adhesive composites. Braz Dent J. Vaidyanathan TK. Color stability of dental com-
2017;28(1):35–9. posites as a function of shade. J Prosthet Dent.
32. Salgado VE, Albuquerque PP, Cavalcante LM, Pfeifer 1998;79(4):372–7.
CS, Moraes RR, Schneider LF. Influence of photoini- 46. Piccoli YB, Lima VP, Basso GR, Salgado VE,
tiator system and nanofiller size on the optical prop- Lima GS, Moraes RR. Optical stability of high-
erties and cure efficiency of model composites. Dent translucency resin-based composites. Oper Dent.
Mater. 2014;30(10):e264–71. 2019;44(5):536–44.
33. Albuquerque PP, Bertolo ML, Cavalcante LM, Pfeifer 47. Cavalcante LM, Schneider LF, Hammad M, Watts
C, Schneider LF. Degree of conversion, depth of cure, DC, Silikas N. Degradation resistance of ormocer-
and color stability of experimental dental compos- and dimethacrylate-based matrices with different
ite formulated with camphorquinone and phenan- filler contents. J Dent. 2012;40(1):86–90.
threnequinone photoinitiators. J Esthet Restor Dent. 48. Valentini F, Oliveira SG, Guimarães GZ, Barbosa
2015;27(1):S49–57. RP, Moraes RR. Effect of surface sealant on the color
34. de Oliveira DC, Rocha MG, Gatti A, Correr AB, stability of composite resin restorations. Braz Dent J.
Ferracane JL, Sinhoret MA. Effect of different photo- 2011;22(5):365–8.
initiators and reducing agents on cure efficiency and 49. Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Unlü N, Uysal
color stability of resin-based composites using differ- Ö. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocy-
ent LED wavelengths. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1565–72. cling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color
35. Salgado VE, Rego GF, Schneider LF, Moraes RR, of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent.
Cavalcante LM. Does translucency influence cure 2013;25(6):404–19.
efficiency and color stability of resin-based compos- 50. Münchow EA, Sedrez-Porto JA, Piva E, Pereira-
ites? Dent Mater. 2018;34(7):957–66. Cenci T, Cenci MS. Use of dental adhesives as
36. Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B, Liska R, modeler liquid of resin composites. Dent Mater.
Rheinberger V. Benzoyl germanium derivatives as 2016;32(4):570–7.
novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. 51. Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Brondani LP, Cenci
Dent Mater. 2008;24(7):901–7. MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Effects of modeling liquid/resin
122 L. F. J. Schneider and L. M. A. Cavalcante
and polishing on the color change of resin composite. 65. Ferracane J. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic
Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1). effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater.
52. Araujo FS, Barros MC, Santana ML, Oliveira LS, 2006;22(3):211–22.
Silva PF, Lima GS, Faria-E-Silva AL. Effects of 66. Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Vouvoudi
adhesive used as modeling liquid on the stability of EC. Volumetric dimensional changes of dental light-
the color and opacity of composites. J Esthet Restor cured dimethacrylate resins after sorption of water or
Dent. 2018;30(5):427–33. ethanol. Dent Mater. 2008;24(8):1131–6.
53. Brooksbank A, Owens BM, Phebus JG, Blen BJ, 67. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N, Watts
Wasson W. Surface sealant effect on the color stability DC. Degradation resistance of silorane, experimental
of a composite resin following ultraviolet light artifi- ormocer and dimethacrylate resin-based dental com-
cial aging. Oper Dent. 2019;44(3):322–30. posites. J Oral Sci. 2011;53(4):413–9.
54. Rizzante FA, Bombonatti JS, Vasconcelos L, Porto 68. Fugolin AP, Pfeifer CS. New resins for dental com-
TS, Teich S, Mondelli RF. Influence of resin-coating posites. J Dent Res. 2017;96(10):1085–91.
agents on the roughness and color of composite res- 69. Cavalcante LM, Masouras M, Watts DC, Pimenta
ins. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(3):332.e1–5. LA, Silikas N. Effect of nanofillers’ size on surface
55. Cortopassi LS, Shimokawa CA, Willers AE, Sobral properties after toothbrush abrasion. Am J Dent.
MA. Surface roughness and color stability of sur- 2009;22(1):60–4.
face sealants and adhesive systems applied over 70. Kaizer MR, Oliveira-Ogliari A, Cenci MS, Opdam
a resin-based composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. NJ, Moraes RR. Do nanofill or submicron com-
2020;32(1):64–72. posites show improved smoothness and gloss? A
56. Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Cenci MS, Pereira- systematic review of in vitro studies. Dent Mater.
Cenci T. Translucency and color stability of resin 2014;30(4):e41–78.
composite and dental adhesives as modeling liquids— 71. Salgado VE, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N, Schneider
a 1-year evaluation. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e54. LF. The influence of nanoscale inorganic content over
57. Janda R, Roulet J-F, Latta M, Kaminsky M, S optical and surface properties of model composites. J
R. Effect of exponential polymerization on color Dent. 2013;41(5):e45–53.
stability of resin-based filling materials. Dent Mater. 72. Salgado VE, Cavalcante LM, Moraes RR, Davis HB,
2007;23(6):696–704. Ferracane JL, Schneider LF. Degradation of optical
58. da Silva Alberton V, da Silva Alberton S, Pecho OE, and surface properties of resin-based composites with
Bacchi A. Influence of composite type and light irra- distinct nanoparticle sizes but equivalent surface area.
diance on color stability after immersion in different J Dent. 2017;59:48–53.
beverages. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(5):390–6. 73. Cavalcante LM, Ferraz LG, Antunes KB, Garcia IM,
59. Söderholm KJ. Degradation mechanisms of dental Schneider LFJ, Collares FM. Silane content influ-
resin composites. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley ences physicochemical properties in nanostructured
WA, Watts DC, editors. Dental materials in vivo: aging model composites. Dent Mater. 2021;37(2):e85–93.
and related phenomena. New Malden: Quintessence; 74. Cavalcante LM, Ramos AB, Silva DC, Alves
2003. GG, Antunes KB, Pfeifer CS, Schneider
60. Brackett MG, Brackett WW, Browning WD, LFJ. Thiourethane-functionalized fillers: biological
Rueggeberg FA. The effect of light curing source properties and degradation resistance. Braz Oral Res.
on the residual yellowing of resin composites. Oper 2021;35:e018.
Dent. 2007;32(5):443–50. 75. Festuccia MS, Garcia LD, Cruvinel DR, Pires-De-
61. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Souza FD. Color stability, surface roughness and
Lassila LV. Short and long term effects of addi- microhardness of composites submitted to mouth
tional post curing and polishing systems on the color rinsing action. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(2):200–5.
change of dental nano-composites. Dent Mater J. 76. Roselino LM, Cruvinel DR, Chinelatti MA, Pires-de-
2013;32(1):107–14. Souza FCP. Effect of brushing and accelerated ageing
62. Duc O, Bella ED, Krejci I, Betrisey E, Abdelaziz M, on color stability and surface roughness of compos-
Ardu S. Staining susceptibility of resin composite ites. J Dent. 2013;41(5):e54–61.
materials. Am J Dent. 2019;32(1):39–42. 77. Lai G, Zhao L, Wang J, Kunzelmann KH. Surface
63. Schroeder T, Silva TB, Basso GR, Franco MC, Maske properties and color stability of dental flowable com-
TT, Cenci MS. Factors affecting the color stability posites influenced by simulated tooth brushing. Dent
and staining of esthetic restorations. Odontology. Mater J. 2018;37(5):717–24.
2019;107(4):507–12. 78. Mathias-Santamaria IF, Roulet JF. The effect of dia-
64. Moraes RR, Marimon JL, Schneider LF, Sinhoreti mond toothpastes on surface gloss of resin compos-
MA, Correr-Sobrinho L, Bueno M. Effects of ites. Am J Dent. 2019;32(4):169–73.
6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface 79. de Moraes Rego Roselino L, Tirapelli C, de Carvalho
roughness of two microhybrid dental composites. J Panzeri Pires‐de‐Souza F. Randomized clinical study
Prosthodont. 2008;17(4):323–6. of alterations in the color and surface roughness of
9 Color Mismatch Between the Restoration and the Natural Tooth Over Time 123
dental enamel brushed with whitening toothpaste. J 86. Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Drozdzik A, Tandecka K,
Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(5):383–9. Grocholewicz K. Effect of air-polishing on surface
80. de Moraes Rego Roselino L, Tonani Torrieri R, roughness of composite dental restorative material—
Sbardelotto C, Alves Amorim A, Noronha Ferraz de comparison of three different air-polishing powders.
Arruda C, Tirapelli C, de Carvalho Panzeri Pires‐ BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):30.
de‐Souza F. Color stability and surface roughness 87. Yu H, Pan X, Lin Y, Li Q, Hussain M, Wang Y. Effects
of composite resins submitted to brushing with of carbamide peroxide on the staining susceptibility
bleaching toothpastes: an in situ study. J Esthet Restor of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent.
Dent. 2019;31(5):486–92. 2009;34(1):72–82.
81. Yap AU, Wu SS, Chelvan S, Tan ES. Effect of hygiene 88. Della Bona A, Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Cardona JC,
maintenance procedures on surface roughness of com- Paravina RD, Perez MM. Influence of bleaching and
posite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2005;30(1):99–104. aging procedures on color and whiteness of dental
82. Pelka MA, Altmaier K, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. The composites. Oper Dent. 2019;44(6):648–58.
effect of air-polishing abrasives on wear of direct 89. Vidal ML, Pecho OE, Xavier J, Della BA. Influence
restoration materials and sealants. J Am Dent Assoc. of the photoactivation distance on the color and white-
2010;141(1):63–70. ness stability of resin-based composite after bleaching
83. Giacomelli L, Salerno M, Derchi G, Genovesi A, and aging. J Dent. 2020;99:103408.
Paganin PP, Covani U. Effect of air polishing with 90. Moraes RR, Marimon JL, Schneider LF, Correr
glycine and bicarbonate powders on a nanocompos- Sobrinho L, Camacho GB, Bueno M. Carbamide
ite used in dental restorations: an in vitro study. Int J peroxide bleaching agents: effects on surface rough-
Periodontics Restor Dent. 2011;31(5):e51–6. ness of enamel, composite and porcelain. Clin Oral
84. Güler AU, Duran I, Yücel AÇ, Ozkan P. Effects of Investig. 2006;10(1):23–8.
air-polishing powders on color stability of composite 91. Mundim FM, Garcia LF, Pires-de-Souza FCP. Effect
resins. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):505–10. of staining solutions and repolishing on color
85. Amari Y, Takamizawa T, Kawamoto R, Namura Y, stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci.
Murayama R, Yokoyama M, Tsujimoto A, Miyazaki 2010;18(3):249–54.
M. Influence of one-step professional mechani- 92. Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa
cal tooth cleaning pastes on surface roughness and MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Anterior
morphological features of tooth substrates and composite restorations: a systematic review on long-
restoratives. J Oral Sci. 2020;30:0420. https://doi. term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater.
org/10.2334/josnusd.20-0420. 2015;31(10):1214–24.
Longevity of Resin Composite
Restorations
10
Flávio Fernando Demarco, Luiz Alexandre Chisini,
Marcos Britto Correa, Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci,
and Rafael Ratto de Moraes
Composite resin restorations have been the first esthetic demand), and socioeconomic status
choice by clinicians and patients for direct anterior might play essential roles in the longevity of
[1] and posterior restorations [2] mainly due to composites [10]. Tooth structure or composite
optical characteristics, high longevity, adhesive fractures are important factors for restorations
properties, and preservation of sound tooth struc- failure, while esthetic demands could account for
ture [3, 4]. Resin composite restorations have pre- restoration replacement in anterior teeth [11].
sented a lower annual failure rate (AFR) ranging To improve dental restorations’ longevity and
from 1 to 3% in posterior teeth and 1–5% in ante- under a minimally invasive dentistry philosophy,
rior teeth [5]. Recent publications have shown that repair has been proposed as an interesting strategy
this material can be used to rehabilitate severely over the replacement, avoiding the repetitive restor-
worn teeth with acceptable clinical success, with ative cycle [12]. Removal of the sound dental struc-
AFR ranging from 0.4% for microhybrid compos- ture occurs when the complete restoration is
ites to 26.3% for microfilled materials [6]. replaced. When the restoration needing replace-
Similarly, a network meta-analysis found an AFR ment is near the vital pulp tissue, the risk of pulp
of 2.2% for use in large posterior restorations [7]. exposure is elevated and can result in unnecessary
The main reasons for failure in posterior resto- endodontic treatments [13, 14]. Therefore, resin res-
rations, both in adults [8] and children [9], are torations can be repaired when a considerable part
fractures and secondary caries. It has been dis- of restoration presents good condition to be main-
cussed that material properties had a minor effect tained. Repair of defective restorations has exhib-
on longevity. At the same time, clinical-related ited good clinical performance, increasing dental
factors (such as the position of the tooth in the restorations’ longevity (Fig. 10.1) [10, 15] and dis-
tooth arc and dental type), the operator (age, playing better cost-effectiveness than replacement
country of qualification, and employment status), [16]. In this chapter, we will discuss the longevity of
patient (caries risk, bruxing habits, parafunction, esthetic composite restorations, the reasons for fail-
ure, and exploring the repair of defective restora-
tions as a treatment option to the replacement.
F. F. Demarco (*) · M. B. Correa · M. S. Cenci
R. R. de Moraes
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of
Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, 10.1 Expectation vs. Reality
Pelotas, RS, Brazil
L. A. Chisini Resin composites have undergone constant
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of development, becoming the most used direct
Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora,
Governador Valadares, MG, Brazil restorative material [2], mainly because of their
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 125
D. Oliveira (ed.), Color Science and Shade Selection in Operative Dentistry,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99173-9_10
126 F. F. Demarco et al.
a b
c d
Fig. 10.1 Clinical phenotypes of resin composite resto- restorations were repaired and still presented good clinical
rations in posterior teeth after at least two decades of clini- performance after several years in the mouth. In (d), res-
cal service. In (a) and (b), the restorations show typical torations were repaired and subjected to polishing, which
signs of aging including loss of anatomical form, surface removed the extrinsic staining and improved appearance.
and marginal staining, color instability, and wear. In (c), (Photography courtesy of Dr. Paullo Rodolpho)
esthetic properties, preservation of tooth struc- highlight that several systematic reviews are
ture, and the high success rates [3, 17]. based exclusively on prospective clinical trials,
Considering the results from clinical studies including low-risk patients. On the other hand,
about the longevity of composite restorations, practice-based studies have displayed AFR
clinicians frequently expect a longevity of more higher when patients with high risk are included
than 20 years for their restorations. However, [8, 35]. In 11 Dutch general practices, a Practice-
despite the excellent results showed in the litera- Based Study evaluated 31,472 restorations
ture, dentists should be aware that different observed an AFR of 7.8% at 2 years [35]. A simi-
aspects involving themselves, the tooth/cavity, lar practice-based retrospective study that
and the patient can interfere with the durability of assessed the survival of resin composite restora-
a restorations. The understanding of these factors tions in posterior teeth found that 30% of the res-
can help professionals to predict better the prob- torations failed, of which 82% were found in
ability of failure of a given restoration. patients with high-risk factors, being secondary
A vast number of systematic reviews have caries the main reason for failure [8].
been published in recent literature presenting the The expectation of longevity is often deter-
AFR/success rate (SR) of resin composites [10, mined by empirical criteria or measures, such as
11, 18–28] (Table 10.1). In general, the system- the average age of a failed restoration. There are
atic reviews have presented similar results: AFR several factors associated with restorative fail-
ranging from 1 to 3% in posterior teeth and from ures that are important to be evaluated for each
1 to 5% in anterior teeth [5]. The AFR increases clinical situation and can more accurately predict
when endodontic treated teeth are investigated: the longevity of restorations. The clinician’s
ranging from 2 to 12.4% [10]. It is important to expectations should be based on the assessment
10 Longevity of Resin Composite Restorations 127
Table 10.1 Results from systematic reviews on the clinical performance of resin composite restorations
Factors associated with Mains reason to Follow-up AFR/survival
Study Tooth type failure failure (years) proportion (SR)
Arbildo-Vega Class I, II and V NR NR 0.5–10 NR
et al., 2020 [29]
Veloso et al., Posterior NR Caries, fracture, 1–6 SP: 94.4%
2019 [30] (class I and II) sensitivity, bulk-fill; 96.7%
anatomical shape, conventional
marginal composite
discoloration
Azeem and Posterior NR NR 1–11 NR
Sureshbabu, (direct and indirect)
2018 [31]
Afrashtehfar Posterior Number of restored NR 3–10 SP: 89.7%
et al., 2017 [18] endodontically surfaces, restorative (3 years); 92.4%
treated teeth material, and technique (5 years)
Afrashtehfar Posterior Number of restored NR 3–6 SR: 50–100%
et al., 2017 [19] surfaces
Ahmed and Anterior (tooth Occlusal Fractures of 0.5–10 SR: >90%
Murbay, 2016 wear) restoration (2.5 years); 50%
[20] (5 years)
van de Sande Posterior Patient age, gender, Caries and fracture 3–21 AFR: 1.7–5.2%
et al., 2016 [28] caries risk, and SP: 72–95%
parafunctional habits
Angeletaki Posterior NR Fracture and 4.5–11 SR: 83.2%
et al., 2016 [21] (inlay/onlay) cohesive restoration (5 years)
failure
Moraschini Posterior (class I NR Fracture (tooth or 1–10 AFR: 3.17%
et al., 2015 [26] and II) restoration) and
caries
Mesko et al., Several worn teeth NR NR 0.5–12 AFR: 0.4%
2016 [6] (microhybrid);
26.3%
(microfilled)
da Veiga et al., Posterior None Fracture (tooth or 2–11 NR
2016 [24] (class I and II) restoration)
Demarco et al., Anterior Adhesive technique, Fracture of tooth/ 3–17 AFR: 0–4.1%
2015 [11] (class III and IV, composite resin, restoration and SR: 100%
veneers and retreatment risk, and esthetic qualities (3 years); 53.4%
reanatomization) time required to (15 years)
build-up the restoration
Heintze et al., Anterior Cavity type, restorative Bulk fractures and 2–12 SP: 95%
2015 [25] (class III and IV, material, bonding caries (10 years—class
diastema closures) strategy III)
90% (10 years—
class IV)
Astvaldsdottir Posterior NR Caries, fracture, 4–12 SP: 93%
et al., 2015 [22] and restoration loss (4 years); 91
(5 years)
Opdam et al., Posterior Patient caries risk, Caries and fracture 6–22 AFR: 1.8%
2014 [27] (class I and II) presence of lining (tooth or (5 years); 2.4%
cement, number of restoration) (10 years)
restored surfaces,
composite filler
loading
Rasines Alcaraz Posterior Restorative material Caries, fracture, 5–7 NR
et al., 2014 [32] and restoration loss
(continued)
128 F. F. Demarco et al.
of risk factors, which may help a more accurate tions are not appropriate, in general, anterior
estimate. Thus, when the restoration is placed on restorations behave differently from posterior
a patient with risk factors (sometimes more than restorations, presenting reduced failures for “loss
one) it is expected that the durability of this res- of restoration” or caries. At the same time,
toration may be less than average observed. On esthetic appearance plays a prominent role in the
the other hand, when few risk factors are found patient’s desire to have a restoration replaced.
clinically, greater longevity can be expected. To
predict better the likelihood of restoration failure 10.1.1.1 Dental Caries
and make the expectation closer to reality, we Secondary caries are reported to be the main reason
need to discuss the main factors associated with for restoration’s failure. By definition, secondary or
the failure of composite materials. recurrent caries are “lesions at the margins of exist-
ing restorations” or “caries associated with restora-
tions or sealants” (CARS) [53, 54]. It is important
10.1.1 Long-Term Survival to note that restoring a tooth is not the definitive
and Reasons for Failures treatment for caries disease—but it may be a part of
the treatment. To be clear, it is necessary to control
Data on composite resin restorations’ survival all the etiological factors that are causing the dis-
have been widely explored for posterior teeth, ease [55]. The understanding of the causal factors
while data of anterior teeth is more limited in the for caries development and their respective control
literature [11]. The main reasons for failure in is necessary. As it is well-established, caries is a
posterior restorations seem to be secondary caries sugar-biofilm- dependent disease, and epidemio-
and the fracture of teeth/restorations [3, 26, 27] logical studies have shown that sugar consumption
(Table 10.2). When high-risk patients are included, in the life course is associated with caries lesions
secondary caries commonly is reported as the [56, 57]. In addition to diet, fluoride consumption,
main reason for restoration failure [8, 35, 51]. hygiene habits, socioeconomic factors, among oth-
Fractures are frequently linked with premature or ers, are essential to be investigated and influence
long-term (fatigue of material) failures, while car- restoration’s survival through secondary caries fail-
ies is related to long-term follow-ups [52]. ures. Considering these aspects, it is possible to
Fracture and esthetic demand have been treat caries disease properly, preventing the occur-
reported as the main failure reasons for anterior rence of secondary caries.
esthetic restoration. Indeed, when the anterior The failure to interrupt the caries disease can
restoration is placed for an esthetic reason, the contribute to the failure of the restoration [58].
likelihood main reason for failure will be related After 18 years, a retrospective study found that
to esthetics (such as color match, anatomical 68.4% of failures were due to secondary caries
form, or surface stain) [11]. Although direct com- [59]. Posterior restorations placed in children
parisons between anterior and posterior restora- with high DMFT index displayed a high risk to
10 Longevity of Resin Composite Restorations 129
Table 10.2 Summary of main factors involved in longevity of composite restorations and their respective effect
measures
Factor Effect
Tooth type – Molars present 2.3 times higher risk of failure than premolars [36]
– Upper central incisors have 1.3 times higher risk of failure than lower lateral
incisors [37]
Cavity size – Each restored surface’s addition leads to an increase of 40% in the risk of
failure [38]
– For premolars, each surface included in the restoration introduces an increase
of 50% on the risk for failure, while for molars, this risk is increased by 24%
for each surface [27]
Previous endodontic treatment – Veneers made in non-vital teeth had a higher risk of failure (178% greater)
over time compared to those made in vital teeth [39]
– Endodontic treatment increases the risk of failure in posterior teeth (HR 25.3)
[40]
Selective caries removal – Selective caries removal does not affect the longevity of restorations, and due
to the fact that it reduces the risk of pulp exposures, it should be chosen
[41–43]
Substrate type There is no consensus in the literature:
– Higher AFR was observed for class II restorations with glass ionomer bases
compared with restorations without a base material [38]
– No significant differences were observed after 18 years of posterior
composite survival with and without glass ionomer cement as a base [44]
Caries risk – AFR was 4.2% in the high-risk group and 0.9% in the low caries risk group
[45]
– Presence of unsatisfactory restorations was 5.3 higher in children at high risk
of caries in the permanent dentition than children classified at low risk [46]
Bruxism and/or parafunctional – Restorations in individuals with high occlusal-stress presented 2.6 times higher
habits risk for failure than individuals with no occlusal-stress [8]
Socioeconomic status – Posterior restorations’ failures are 2.2-fold more prevalent in low-income
individuals [47]
Operator – Important variations in the longevity of composite restorations were observed
according to the dentist [48]
Material – To observe the effect of materials properties on annual failure rates long
periods are needed [5, 10, 17]
Esthetic demands – Anterior restoration placed for esthetic reasons presents a higher likelihood to
be changed due to esthetics-related factors such as color match, anatomical
form, or surface stain [11]
Rubber dam isolation – The use of rubber dam seems not to be decisively provided that good isolation
with cotton and suction is achieved [49]
Enamel beveling – Enamel beveling does not affect the clinical performance of the restoration
[34]
Adhesive system – Gold standard dental adhesive technique is the use of a mild two-step, a
self-etch adhesive system with selective phosphoric acid enamel etching [50]
Direct vs indirect composite – Direct and indirect composite restorations have similar performance and
longevity [24]
HR hazard ratio, AFR annual failure rate
fail [60], corroborating with a systematic review anterior region compared to posterior teeth.
that observed caries as the main reason for the Practice-based studies have already corroborated
failure of posterior restoration in primary teeth, these findings [37, 61, 62].
independently of restorative material [9]. On the
other hand, considering anterior composite resto- 10.1.1.2 Fracture
rations in permanent teeth, caries has a low con- Tooth/restoration fracture has been highlighted
tribution in failures in a systematic review [11], as the main reason for failure in anterior teeth. In
probably due to a low incidence of caries in the a systematic review that evaluated the longevity
130 F. F. Demarco et al.
of anterior restoration, the fracture (tooth/restora- Color alterations, marginal mismatch, and sur-
tion) was the most common reason for failure face staining are some of the motifs for patients
among all studies [11], with rates varying from to require replacement of their veneer restora-
25 to 100% of all failures observed in the included tions [67]. However, for posterior teeth, the
studies. esthetic demand is a less important factor to some
Bruxism of parafunctional habits probably patients. When evaluating restorations after
plays a significant role in the fracture of the tooth 27 years in clinical service, the ones carried out
or restorations via tooth-restoration complex with chemical-cured resin composite (which
fatigue, resulting in a fracture as a long-term out- presents accelerate deterioration of color match
come. In addition to the complex etiopathogenic linked to the non-color stable initiators of the
mechanisms of bruxism, which hinder its correct peroxide-initiated curing mechanism) were 59%
diagnosis, in general, studies do not use reliable non-acceptable to the researchers who evaluated
instruments for their assessment. Also, quite often, these restorations, while only 6.3% of light-cured
studies excluded bruxism patients. Restorations materials were classified as non-acceptable.
performed in participants with severe tooth wear However, these restorations were not classified as
presented negative findings when compared to a failure because no patients requested replace-
participants without bruxism habits in a clinical ment of non-acceptable color restoration, which
study with patients with severe tooth wear [63]. were in function [49].
Indeed, when restorations are placed in individuals
presenting bruxism symptoms, more failures due
to fracture could occur [64]. In a practice-based 10.1.2 Factors Involved in Esthetic
study, when patients showed “occlusal-stress,” Restorations Failure
there was a 2.6-fold risk of failure than in individu-
als with “no risk” [8]. Whereas most of the attention in the clinical stud-
ies in restorative dentistry is given to the restora-
10.1.1.3 Esthetic Demand tion’s longevity and the failure causes, it is of
Modern society has increased the demand for utmost importance to study all the factors affect-
esthetics [65]. Especially the anterior teeth must ing the restoration’s failure. I this context, even if
be well-aligned and white, which impacts the most clinicians give quite some importance to the
oral health-related quality of life [66]. The high dental material and dental techniques, factors
visibility and the importance of the smile’s related to the characteristics of the patient, opera-
appearance expose the anterior restorations to a tor, and tooth are critical in assessing the long-
greater risk of undergoing interventions due to term survival of restorations [10]. Also,
esthetic demands. In this region, small marginal population studies found that socioeconomic and
pigmentations observed with the natural degrada- demographic factors influenced the choice of
tion of the hybrid layer or small natural changes restorative materials, the patients’ risk status,
in color or shape resulting from the natural aging and, consequently, the longevity of the dental res-
of composites can result in early interventions in torations [58].
these restorations. Especially in patients who
exhibit a high esthetic demand. Unlike the poste- 10.1.2.1 Tooth Factors
rior region, where color changes appear to be less Restoration survival depends on several clinical-
important [49]. It is clear that these changes are related factors for their longevity, including the
linked to factors related to patients and may tooth position in the dental ark, tooth type, cavity
depend on cultural and contextual factors of these size, previous endodontic treatment, and sub-
individuals, which are incredibly subjective. strate type [3, 10, 27].
Upper front teeth restorations exhibited a Restorations in premolars have shown better
higher risk for failure when compared with lower survival results than those placed in molars, and
front teeth, especially in young patients [37]. the explanations are related to higher masticatory
10 Longevity of Resin Composite Restorations 131
forces observed in the molar region [8, 10, 38, cement used could explain the different results
68–70]. After 10 years, general practitioners’ res- observed [10, 44]. Therefore, there is no consen-
torations have a hazard ratio of 2.3 to fail in molar sus in the literature about the influence of GIC
than premolar [36]. Similar results have been under composite restorations.
reported in other studies [8, 10, 38, 68–70]. After The endodontic treatment represents a chal-
27 years, class II restorations in molars presented lenging situation for restoration longevity in both
a failure risk almost 5 higher than premolars [49]. anterior and posterior teeth. The significant loss
However, some studies did not find significant dif- of dental structure in these teeth could be related
ferences [45, 71]. For restoration in anterior teeth, to the main reason for reducing the success rate.
failures were more frequent in upper central inci- A 13-year clinical trial comparing restorations in
sors and upper canines, when evaluating both vital and endodontic treated teeth observed AFR
children and adults in a practice-based study [37]. of 0.08 and 1.78%, respectively [40]. An AFR of
The increase in the number of surfaces 4.9% was observed in vital teeth and 9.8% in
involved in the restorations has been associated non-vital teeth in evaluating anterior composite
with a higher risk of failure [10, 36, 38, 72]. veneers. Veneers made in non-vital teeth had a
Posterior restorations fail 3.3 times more often in higher risk of failure (HR 2.78; 95% CI 1.02–
teeth with fewer than 2 remaining walls than 7.56) over time compared to those made in vital
those with 4 [73]. For premolars, each surface teeth [39].
included in the restoration introduces a hazard The selective carious tissue removal of soft
risk of 1.5, while for molars, the risk is 1.24 [27]. dentine has also been discussed. It is important to
Opdam et al. [38] estimate that each restored sur- consider that selective caries removal decreases
face’s addition leads to an increased 40% risk of the risk of pulp exposition [41] and can improve
failure. Similarly, it was reported that every extra the longevity of restorations [42]. A 5-years ran-
missing wall increases the failure risk from 30 to domized trial observed that selective caries
40% [74]. Thus, class II restorations present a removal to soft dentin in deep caries did not
higher risk than Class I. Also, class III restora- affect the restoration survival when compared to
tions tend to fail less than other anterior restora- stepwise excavation [43]. A systematic review
tions types [11]. Collares et al. [37] observed a observed that selective caries removal have simi-
high-risk of failure in anterior restorations with lar results in restoration longevity than stepwise
three or more involved surfaces (Class IV) than excavation and result in fewer pulp complications
class III restoration, highlighting that restoration [42]. Similar results were observed in a multi-
size is an important predictor of failure risk also center clinical trial considering primary posterior
in anterior teeth. teeth. The longevity of restorations was similar
Glass ionomer cement sandwich-type restora- between non-selective and selective carious tis-
tions are frequently used to perform indirect pulp sue removal over 33 months [78]; but a system-
protection in deep caries lesions. Using a GIC atic review with a limited number of included
liner or base under composite resin restorations articles with a high risk of bias have observed
has shown divergent results in the literature. In that—in primary teeth—selective caries removal
several studies, the use of an intermediate GIC decrease the restoration longevity [79]. Thus, for
liner negatively influenced the restorations’ sur- primary teeth, no definitive conclusion about the
vival, resulting in more fracture of composite influence of selective caries removal on restora-
resin [10, 27, 38, 75, 76]. An AFR of 3.8% was tion longevity can be performed.
observed for class II restorations with glass iono-
mer bases while observing an AFR of 1.4% for 10.1.2.2 Patients’ Related Factors
restorations without a base material [38]. In The focus of a vast number of clinical trials
opposite, other studies observed no effect on res- investigating the survival of restorations is lim-
toration longevity when using GIC liners [44, 68, ited to comparisons between technic or materials
77]. The thickness and type of glass ionomer [80, 81] while patients-related factors are not
132 F. F. Demarco et al.
investigated. The contribution to patient-related risk patients when the restoration is placed may
factors on restoration survival cannot be ignored provide a reasonable estimate, such as the lesion
[11, 27, 28]. When patients are not mainly activity assessment [85].
selected for inclusion criteria in clinical trials, Bruxism and parafunctional habits have been
some studies have observed that failures are reported as factors that overload the restorations
linked to certain participants, independently of and increases the likelihood of restoration/teeth
restorative material used [82]. Similar results are failure due to fatigue. Fracture of restorations is
observed in epidemiological studies where caries frequently reported as the second main reason for
is the central factor in explaining the failure and restorations failure. Fracture is the main failure
replacement of dental restorations [83, 84]. of patients with habits of grinding and clenching
Corroborating, a birth cohort study, observed that teeth [8]. 70% of the restoration’s fractures
unsatisfactory restorations at 24 years were more occurred in patients with the parafunctional habit
prevalent in individuals that presented a high in a long-term follow-up (30 years) [71]. Patients
number of decayed teeth at 15 years [58]. with bruxism were also associated with a 37-fold
Caries risk of patients has been associated more failed restoration or catastrophic fracture
with higher restorations failure. Restorations occurred whether the teeth presented root canal
placed in the high-risk group showed a lower sur- treatment [40]. In a practice-based retrospective
vival rate than the low-risk group after 5 and study that evaluated the survival of resin compos-
12 years. Considering 12 years of evaluation, ite restorations in posterior teeth, individuals
AFR was 4.2% in the high-risk group and 0.9% with high occlusal-stress displayed three times
in the low caries risk group [45]. In a clinical higher risk to failure than individuals with low
trial, corroborating that after 30 years, 64% of occlusal-stress; moreover, individuals with
restorations that failed due to secondary caries occlusal-stress and caries risk showed a cumula-
were observed in the high-risk group [71]. A tive effect and eight times more failures than indi-
review observed that caries risk was associated viduals no risk [8].
with decreased restoration survival, including Instruments for assessing bruxism habits used
amalgam and composite resin [28]. In a cohort in studies that evaluate restorative materials are not
study evaluating posterior restorations (compos- objective, and they do not present standardized
ite or amalgam), it was observed that individuals cutoff points, which limit their inference [10]. The
who had a higher trajectory of caries during their most recent International Consensus [86] pro-
life were more likely to present failed restora- posed a system for evaluating bruxism, consider-
tions in adult life [47]. In another cohort study, in ing that possible bruxism during sleep is based
children at the age 12, the chances of presenting only on the author’s report (report of patients),
unsatisfactory restorations were 5.3 higher in probable sleep bruxism (with clinical inspection
children at high-risk for untreated dental caries in such as the presence of tooth wear), and definitive
the permanent dentition than children at low risk. sleep bruxism (based on instrumental assessment,
If the parents have received orientation from pro- such as polysomnographic). Furthermore, brux-
fessionals on preventing caries development in ism’s etiology is considered to be multifactorial,
their offspring, the children exhibited a 91.0% and several underlying mechanisms may play a
less chance of having an unsatisfactory restora- role in triggering and perpetuating events [87].
tion than children whose parents never received Post-operative sensitivity was one of the
information [46]. Decayed, missing, filled teeth- causes of patient-related failures in the first clini-
surfaces (DMFT-S) have been used to evaluate cal studies evaluating composite restorations;
caries experience, even as the component D of however, such aspect is not observed in modern
DMFT. Also, the number of the previous restora- studies, primarily due to the improvements in
tion was used to access caries risk. However, the adhesive systems [88] and restorative technique
use of a cumulative indicator could overestimate [89]. Several studies have found that participant’s
the caries risk. Therefore, identifying high-caries age significantly influences restoration longevity
10 Longevity of Resin Composite Restorations 133
[37, 90, 91]. The explanations are directed to the of medium and high socioeconomic status [48].
influence of age in other co-variables like dental Some studies have corroborated with the discus-
caries, patient cooperation, among others, and it sion of the influence of socioeconomic and
is not recommended to be considered as an iso- behavioral factor on the survival of composite
lated factor [5]. Caries activity has been reported resins [93–96].
to be the more frequent reason for making a den-
tal restoration in the young population. 10.1.2.4 Restorative Material
Consequently, these restorations would be sub- Although in vitro studies have found consider-
ject to higher risk due to individual factors. A able differences between the properties of com-
study that followed 4355 restorations placed by mercially available restorative materials [97, 98],
115 dentists in the Public Dental Health Service these findings are limited in predicting the clini-
in Denmark observed that posterior composite cal behavior of restorations [76]. In fact, in vitro
resin restorations placed in children presented and clinical studies have presented contradictory
more likely to fail than those placed in the adoles- evidence of direct restorations’ clinical perfor-
cent group [90]. mance in posterior teeth [24]. Perhaps differ-
ences observed in laboratory tests will take
10.1.2.3 Socioeconomic Status decades to be observed clinically [17]. Yet, the
Limited studies have investigated the influence of differences can be so minor in clinical outcomes
socioeconomic variables and their influence on that they may not be statistically significant [71].
the longevity of composite restorations. Most For posterior teeth, a retrospective study with
studies evaluating the longevity of restorations data from one dentist’s private clinical practice
are carried out in private dental clinics or are per- followed two types of composites for long peri-
formed under high control in randomized clinical ods. No differences in performances were
trials, excluding patients with high-caries risk observed 17 years; however, after 22 years of
[10]. Frequently only individuals with high follow-up, midfilled (70 vol% inorganic filler
socioeconomic status are included. However, the loading) composite showed superior performance
findings of studies that investigate the influence than minifilled (55 vol% inorganic filler loading)
of socioeconomic status suggest that it influences [17]. Similar tendencies were observed to ante-
dental restorations survival via dental caries. One rior restorations: only after 10 years of follow-up
study carried out in a birth cohort investigate the significative differences between restorative
influence of socioeconomic trajectory in the life composites were clinically observed [61].
course and found more unsatisfactory restora- Another study that retrospectively evaluated
tions in the low trajectory group. Individuals who for up to 20 years the longevity of restorations
always lived in the poorest stratus presented more placed by one operator under rubber dam isola-
failures than those who lived in the wealthiest tion and patients with regular check-up visits did
layer [58]. A more recent follow-up of this cohort not find differences between the composites
reported that posterior restorations’ failures were placed in posterior teeth [99]. Similarly, after
significant associated with socioeconomic status 30 years of another controlled trial, no differ-
at age 30, with a prevalence ratio of 2.21 (95% CI ences between composite resins placed with
1.19–4.09) in low-income tertile [47]. In the chemical-cured and light-cured resin composite
same way, a recent study assessing restorations were observed regarding survival rate. Thus, to
performed in the Brazilian public oral health ser- compare the clinical survival of restorations is
vice found that people with lower access to pub- necessary long-term studies. Moreover, these
lic services presented lower survival rates of studies’ results are with materials that were
composite restorations [92]. A practice-based developed decades ago and are expected to be
study also observed that restorations performed inferior to the composite resins recently
by clinicians located in the more deprived region developed.
presented higher AFR than those found in areas
134 F. F. Demarco et al.
A wide number of composite materials have and bevel are not indicated because they does not
been introduced in the market, and the clinical tri- affect the clinical performance [34]. Moreover,
als’ design to compare these new materials pres- the use of rubber dam isolation does not seem to
ent few years of follow-up. The main modification affect the longevity of restorations, as long as it is
in the inorganic formulation of composites was applied effectively with cotton rolls and suction
the introduction of nanofiller composites. These devices. Although some studies have observed
materials were created to provide superior polish better performances of restorations applied under
and gloss retention. A randomized 10-years trial rubber dam isolation [9, 34], the evidence shows
of class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid that restorations placed using cotton rolls and
resin composite observed an overall AFR of 1.9% suction device can also survive for long periods
and no significant difference between the com- [49] and the use of appropriate suction device
posites [100]. In another study, the overall success and working with the aid of a dental nurse are
rate was 100% after 6 years of clinical evaluation even more important for achieving good isolation
for nanohybrid and hybrid composite [101]. At from humidity in case rubber dam is not used.
8 years, the success rate was 98.5%, with no dif-
ferences observed between materials [102]. 10.1.2.5 Operator
A recent development in resin composite tech- Dentist-linked factors, such as operator skills, are
nology was the introduction of “bulk-fill” resin considered important factors that influenced the
composites. Bulk-fill composites can be cured in survival of composite resin restorations [5].
up to 4 or 5 mm layers and include both low as Although a wide part of results is explained
high viscosity materials. A randomized clinical solely on the training level and accuracy of work,
trial compared to class I and II restorations com- the decision-making process also can influence
pared flowable bulk-filled resin composite (in restoration survival and could combine as a com-
increments up to 4 mm as needed to fill the cavity plex process, ranging among clinicians according
and 2 mm short of the occlusal cave surface with to co-variables, such as the type of practice, reim-
the occlusal part completed with nanohybrid bursement system, competition environment
resin composite) and resin composite-only placed among dentists, patients’ views and opinions,
in 2 mm increments. After 5 years of evaluation, and cultural aspects.
bulk-filled presented an AFR of 1.1% and the The dentists are the ones who place the resto-
resin composite-only restorations of 1.3%, with rations, those who evaluate them, and, ultimately,
no significant differences detected between the decide when the restoration needs to be changed.
materials [102]. Variability on diagnostic and decision-making
Although the comparisons of direct and indi- has been elevated among dentists that frequently
rect composite restorations have similar perfor- adopt an invasive approach to intervene in resto-
mance and longevity [24], other factors related to rations, especially when they were performed by
the restorative technique have been reported to other professionals [13]. Invasive behavior
influence the clinical performance of composite toward restoration replacement results in a
materials. Adhesive systems are frequently evalu- decrease in the survival of restoration. Chisini
ated in Class V restorations and also influenced et al. [106] observed that the decision-making of
the longevity of these restorations [103], even dentists was influenced by patient skin color.
though, for anterior restorations, the degradation Clinicians choose more to replace ill-adapted res-
of the hybrid layer could affect more the esthet- toration in white patients while they decide not to
ics, while such aspect seems not to be relevant for intervene in restoration from dark-skinned indi-
posterior composite restorations [88, 104, 105]. viduals [106]. Dentists frequently choose to
Regarding longevity or restorations, the gold replace restorations with a small sign of marginal
standard dental adhesive technique is the use of a degradation or staining because they then con-
mild two-step, self-etch adhesive system with found with secondary caries. After 27 years of
selective phosphoric acid enamel etching [50] follow-up on posterior chemical-cured resin
10 Longevity of Resin Composite Restorations 135
composite with the high color changed (classified on the dentist’s clinical expertise rather than on
as non-acceptable research evaluators) were strict criteria. Thus, dentists adopt different
maintained in function and classified as satisfac- approaches (repair or replacement) in cases of
tory to the patients [49]. Even secondary caries imperfect restorations [112], although the litera-
kept restricted in the enamel can be maintained ture presents a consensus that, when possible,
and treated with non-operative treatments [107], repaired restorations presents benefits and are
and the repair can—preferably—choose if opera- more cost-effective than replacement [16].
tive treatment is required.
Despite clinical studies with trained and cali-
brated operators maybe not observe significant 10.2.1 Long-Term Survival
associations between operator and success, and Reasons for Failures
practice-based studies have observed that age, of Repaired Restorations
country of qualification, and employment status
of the operator could influence the survival of Replacement of a failed restoration is still one of
restoration [5]. Data from Washington dental ser- the most frequent treatments performed in dental
vice observed that restorations placed by efficient practice [113]. While most dentists state to per-
dentists survive almost 5 months more than resto- form repairs, and the vast majority of dental
rations performed by inefficient dentists, and no schools teach repairs, the proportion of truly
differences between the restorations were repaired restorations is still very low [16]. A clin-
observed when efficient dentists performed than ical trial assessed the longevity of repaired resto-
[108]. Similarly, the longevity of restorations rations and showed similar longevity than
placed by more experienced clinicians was better replaced restorations after 12 years of follow-up
than those placed for less experienced ones [109]. [15]. Repaired and replaced restorations pre-
Restorations placed by the dentist with less prac- sented similar behavior in marginal adaptation,
tice workload presented a success rate of about marginal stain, teeth sensitivity, anatomic form,
twice than those slightly busy clinicians [110]. A and luster parameter, although roughness was
geospatial analysis carried out in Canada significative was significantly worse in the group
observed more aggressive treatment choices were of repaired restorations [15].
performed by dentists who feel under great com- Casagrande et al. [114] estimated the reduc-
petitive pressure and in low dentist density areas tion in AFR when repaired restorations were not
[111]. Therefore, all these issues and the differ- considered as a “true failure” and observed that
ences in the decision-making process on judging repair increases the longevity of direct posterior
restorations intensification the risk for replace- restorations. When repair was not considered as a
ment restorations and decrease the survival rates. failure, the survival of restoration changed from
83.1 (AFR = 3.6%) to 87.9% (ARF = 2.5%) at
5 years and from 65.9 (AFR = 4.1%) to 74.6%
10.2 Repairing Esthetic (AFR = 2.9%) at 10 years of follow-up. Reduction
Composite Restorations of AFR from 1.83 to 0.72% in composite resins
repaired restorations after 12 years of follow-up
Patients that changed the dentist have an increased was observed in another study [115]. A study that
chance to replace their restorations [93–96]. In follows for 22 years posterior composite restora-
fact, a cross-sectional study that included 194 tions performed by one dentist observed that a
dentists of the Dental Practice-Based Research reduction from 1.9 to 0.7% on AFR when restora-
Network observed that the decision to repair tions repaired were not considered as failures
defective restoration instead to replace is influ- [10, 17].
enced by who place the original one: clinicians A study that evaluated 880 restorations placed
are less demanding when evaluating their work in posterior and anterior teeth observed that
[13]. The decision to replace a restoration relies repair increases the survival of restorations even
136 F. F. Demarco et al.
properties of the material, nowadays, most of the motion environment, emphasizing preventive
failures are related to factors related to the patient practices. The adoption of healthy behaviors by
and the operator. When small changes in color, patients will consequently led to “healthy” resto-
shape, or fractures are observed, repair should rations, increasing the longevity of treatments.
always be the first choice. However, in some situ- The adoption of minimally invasive dentistry for
ations where the remaining restoration is inte- the management of deteriorated restorations,
grally degraded, replacement of the restoration such as refurbishment or repair restorations,
can be indicated. should be considered in routine practice. In this
way, dentists should react less in front of small
defects of restorations, indicating replacements
10.3.1 Restorations Do Not Last only when other alternatives are not plausible.
Forever
review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J period (1996–2015): a meta-analysis of prospective
Paediatr Dent. 2018;28:123–39. studies. Dent Mater. 2015;31:958–85.
10. Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, 24. da Veiga AM, Cunha AC, Ferreira DM, da
Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite resto- Silva Fidalgo TK, Chianca TK, Reis KR, Maia
rations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. LC. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite
2012;28:87–101. restorations in permanent posterior teeth: a system-
11. Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, atic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;54:1–12.
Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam 25. Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effective-
NJ. Anterior composite restorations: a systematic ness of direct anterior restorations—a meta-analysis.
review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015;31:481–95.
Dent Mater. 2015;31:1214–24. 26. Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos
12. Elderton RJ. Restorations without conventional cav- GO. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of
ity preparations. Int Dent J. 1988;38:112–8. posterior restorations: a systematic review and meta-
13. Gordan VV, Riley J 3rd, Geraldeli S, Williams OD, analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:1043–50.
Spoto JC 3rd, Gilbert GH, National Dental PCG. The 27. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci
decision to repair or replace a defective restoration MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg
is affected by who placed the original restoration: A, Huysmans MC, van Dijken JW. Longevity of pos-
findings from the National Dental PBRN. J Dent. terior composite restorations: a systematic review
2014;42:1528–34. and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93:943–9.
14. Kanzow P, Hoffmann R, Tschammler C, Kruppa J, 28. van de Sande FH, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci
Rodig T, Wiegand A. Attitudes, practice, and expe- MS, Demarco FF, Opdam N. Restoration survival:
rience of German dentists regarding repair restora- revisiting patients’ risk factors through a systematic
tions. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1087–93. literature review. Oper Dent. 2016;41:S7–S26.
15. Estay J, Martin J, Viera V, Valdivieso J, Bersezio 29. Arbildo-Vega HI, Lapinska B, Panda S, Lamas-Lara
C, Vildosola P, Mjor IA, Andrade MF, Moraes RR, C, Khan AS, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Clinical
Moncada G, Gordan VV, Fernandez E. 12 Years of effectiveness of bulk-fill and conventional resin
repair of amalgam and composite resins: a clinical composite restorations: systematic review and meta-
study. Oper Dent. 2018;43:12–21. analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12:1786.
16. Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F. Cost- 30. Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, Do
effectiveness of repairing versus replacing compos- Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo
ite or amalgam restorations. J Dent. 2016;54:41–7. Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and
17. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci conventional resin composite restorations in poste-
MS, Loguercio AD, Moraes RR, Bronkhorst EM, rior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Opdam NJ, Demarco FF. 22-Year clinical evalua- Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:221–33.
tion of the performance of two posterior compos- 31. Azeem RA, Sureshbabu NM. Clinical performance
ites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater. of direct versus indirect composite restorations in
2011;27:955–63. posterior teeth: a systematic review. J Conserv Dent.
18. Afrashtehfar KI, Ahmadi M, Emami E, Abi-Nader S, 2018;21:2–9.
Tamimi F. Failure of single-unit restorations on root 32. Rasines Alcaraz MG, Veitz-Keenan A, Sahrmann P,
filled posterior teeth: a systematic review. Int Endod Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Direct
J. 2017a;50:951–66. composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings
19. Afrashtehfar KI, Emami E, Ahmadi M, Eilayyan O, for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane
Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure rate of single-unit Database Syst Rev. 2014;3:CD005620.
restorations on posterior vital teeth: a systematic 33. Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal
review. J Prosthet Dent. 2017b;117:345–53. JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic
20. Ahmed KE, Murbay S. Survival rates of anterior inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater.
composites in managing tooth wear: systematic 2013;29:1209–18.
review. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43:145–53. 34. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of
21. Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos direct class II restorations—a meta-analysis. J Adhes
D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite res- Dent. 2012;14:407–31.
torations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and 35. Laske M, Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Braspenning
meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:12–21. JCC, Huysmans M. Risk factors for dental restora-
22. Astvaldsdottir A, Dagerhamn J, van Dijken JW, tion survival: a practice-based study. J Dent Res.
Naimi-Akbar A, Sandborgh-Englund G, Tranaeus S, 2019;98:414–22.
Nilsson M. Longevity of posterior resin composite 36. Laske M, Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Braspenning
restorations in adults—a systematic review. J Dent. JCC, Huysmans M. Ten-year survival of class II res-
2015;43:934–54. torations placed by general practitioners. JDR Clin
23. Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A, Bitriol B, Dumitrescu Trans Res. 2016b;1:292–9.
N, Bauer P, Moritz A, Schedle A. Survival of direct 37. Collares K, Opdam NJM, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM,
resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year Demarco FF, Correa MB, Huysmans M. Longevity
10 Longevity of Resin Composite Restorations 139
of anterior composite restorations in a general dental between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes.
practice-based network. J Dent Res. 2017;96:1092–9. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e100–21.
38. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans 51. Montagner AF, Sande FHV, Muller C, Cenci MS,
BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich Susin AH. Survival, reasons for failure and clini-
and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. cal characteristics of anterior/posterior composites:
J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:469–75. 8-year findings. Braz Dent J. 2018;29:547–54.
39. Coelho-de-Souza FH, Goncalves DS, Sales MP, 52. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle
Erhardt MC, Correa MB, Opdam NJ, Demarco A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations
FF. Direct anterior composite veneers in vital and in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:63–70.
non-vital teeth: a retrospective clinical evaluation. J 53. Askar H, Krois J, Gostemeyer G, Bottenberg P,
Dent. 2015;43:1330–6. Zero D, Banerjee A, Schwendicke F. Secondary
40. Lempel E, Lovasz BV, Bihari E, Krajczar K, Jeges S, caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled,
Toth A, Szalma J. Long-term clinical evaluation of detected, and managed? Clin Oral Investig.
direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. end- 2020;24:1869–76.
odontically treated posterior teeth—retrospective 54. Machiulskiene V, Campus G, Carvalho JC, Dige
study up to 13 years. Dent Mater. 2019;35:1308–18. I, Ekstrand KR, Jablonski-Momeni A, Maltz M,
41. Barros M, De Queiroz Rodrigues MI, Muniz F, Manton DJ, Martignon S, Martinez-Mier EA, Pitts
Rodrigues LKA. Selective, stepwise, or nonselec- NB, Schulte AG, Splieth CH, Tenuta LMA, Ferreira
tive removal of carious tissue: which technique Zandona A, Nyvad B. Terminology of Dental Caries
offers lower risk for the treatment of dental caries and Dental Caries Management: consensus report
in permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta- of a workshop organized by ORCA and Cariology
analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:521–32. Research Group of IADR. Caries Res. 2020;54:7–14.
42. Hoefler V, Nagaoka H, Miller CS. Long-term sur- 55. Sheiham A. Dietary effects on dental diseases.
vival and vitality outcomes of permanent teeth fol- Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:569–91.
lowing deep caries treatment with step-wise and 56. Moynihan PJ, Kelly SA. Effect on caries of restrict-
partial-caries-removal: a systematic review. J Dent. ing sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO
2016;54:25–32. guidelines. J Dent Res. 2014;93:8–18.
43. Jardim JJ, Mestrinho HD, Koppe B, de Paula LM, 57. Peres MA, Sheiham A, Liu P, Demarco FF, Silva
Alves LS, Yamaguti PM, Almeida JCF, Maltz AE, Assuncao MC, Menezes AM, Barros FC, Peres
M. Restorations after selective caries removal: KG. Sugar consumption and changes in dental car-
5-year randomized trial. J Dent. 2020;99:103416. ies from childhood to adolescence. J Dent Res.
44. van de Sande FH, Rodolpho PA, Basso GR, Patias 2016;95:388–94.
R, da Rosa QF, Demarco FF, Opdam NJ, Cenci MS. 58. Correa MB, Peres MA, Peres KG, Horta BL, Barros
18-Year survival of posterior composite resin resto- AJ, Demarco FF. Do socioeconomic determinants
rations with and without glass ionomer cement as affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A
base. Dent Mater. 2015;31:669–75. multilevel approach. J Dent. 2013;41:960–7.
45. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, 59. Alonso V, Darriba IL, Caserio M. Retrospective
Huysmans MC. A 12-Year survival of composite vs. evaluation of posterior composite resin sandwich
amalgam restorations. J Dent Res. 2010;89:1063–7. restorations with Herculite XRV: 18-year findings.
46. Cumerlato C, Demarco FF, Barros AJD, Peres MA, Quintessence Int. 2017;48:93–101.
Peres KG, Morales Cascaes A, de Camargo MBJ, 60. Trachtenberg F, Maserejian NN, Tavares M, Soncini
da Silva Dos Santos I, Matijasevich A, Correa JA, Hayes C. Extent of tooth decay in the mouth and
MB. Reasons for direct restoration failure from increased need for replacement of dental restora-
childhood to adolescence: a birth cohort study. J tions: the New England Children’s amalgam trial.
Dent. 2019;89:103183. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30:388–92.
47. Collares K, Opdam NJ, Peres KG, Peres MA, Horta 61. Baldissera RA, Correa MB, Schuch HS, Collares
BL, Demarco FF, Correa MB. Higher experience K, Nascimento GG, Jardim PS, Moraes RR, Opdam
of caries and lower income trajectory influence the NJ, Demarco FF. Are there universal restorative
quality of restorations: a multilevel analysis in a composites for anterior and posterior teeth? J Dent.
birth cohort. J Dent. 2018;68:79–84. 2013;41:1027–35.
48. Laske M, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Braspenning 62. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Fracture frequency and
JC, Huysmans MC. Longevity of direct restora- longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-
tions in Dutch dental practices. Descriptive study modified resin composite, and resin-modified
out of a practice based research network. J Dent. glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an
2016a;46:12–7. up to 14 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Investig.
49. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. A randomized controlled 2010;14:217–22.
27 years follow up of three resin composites in class 63. Bartlett D, Sundaram G. An up to 3-year randomized
II restorations. J Dent. 2015b;43:1547–58. clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin
50. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, composites used to restore worn posterior teeth. Int J
Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship Prosthodont. 2006;19:613–7.
140 F. F. Demarco et al.
64. Hamburger JT, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Kreulen carious removal: a multicenter clinical trial. Caries
CM, Roeters JJ, Huysmans MC. Clinical perfor- Res. 2021;55:55–62.
mance of direct composite restorations for treatment 79. Pedrotti D, Cavalheiro CP, Casagrande L, de Araujo
of severe tooth wear. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13:585–93. FB, Pettorossi Imparato JC, de Oliveira RR, Lenzi
65. Silva FBD, Chisini LA, Demarco FF, Horta BL, TL. Does selective carious tissue removal of soft
Correa MB. Desire for tooth bleaching and treatment dentin increase the restorative failure risk in primary
performed in Brazilian adults: findings from a birth teeth? Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am
cohort. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e12. Dent Assoc. 2019;150:582–90.
66. Goettems ML, Fernandez MDS, Donassollo TA, 80. Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y,
Henn Donassollo S, Demarco FF. Impact of tooth Chen Z. Evaluation of packable and conventional
bleaching on oral health-related quality of life in hybrid resin composites in class I restorations: three-
adults: a triple-blind randomised clinical trial. J year results of a randomized, double-blind and con-
Dent. 2021;105:103564. trolled clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2010;35:11–9.
67. Alonso V, Caserio M. A clinical study of direct com- 81. Yazici AR, Ustunkol I, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac
posite full-coverage crowns: long-term results. Oper B. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restor-
Dent. 2012;37:432–41. ative resins in class I restorations. Oper Dent.
68. Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. Nine-year 2014;39:248–55.
evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/ 82. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays:
resin composite open sandwich technique in class II an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000;28:299–306.
cavities. J Dent. 2007;35:124–9. 83. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjor IA, Wilson
69. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW, Halken J, Hallonsten NH. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons
AL, Hoigaard R. Longevity of posterior resin com- for the placement and replacement of restorations
posite restorations in permanent teeth in public den- provided by vocational dental practitioners and their
tal health service: a prospective 8 years follow up. J trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int.
Dent. 2013;41:297–306. 1999;30:234–42.
70. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Eight-year randomized 84. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, van Dijken JW, Funegard
clinical evaluation of class II nanohybrid resin com- U, Lindberg A, Nilsson M. Selection of dental mate-
posite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch rials and longevity of replaced restorations in public
or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Clin Oral dental health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent.
Investig. 2015;19:1371–9. 2009;37:673–8.
71. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. A randomized con- 85. Maltz M, Leal FL, Wagner MB, Zenkner J, Brusius
trolled 30 years follow up of three conventional CD, Alves LS. Can we diagnose a patient’s caries
resin composites in class II restorations. Dent Mater. activity based on lesion activity assessment? Findings
2015a;31:1232–44. from a cohort study. Caries Res. 2020;54:218–25.
72. Lempel E, Toth A, Fabian T, Krajczar K, Szalma 86. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P,
J. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct com- Glaros AG, Kato T, Santiago V, Winocur E, De Laat
posite restorations: 10-year findings. Dent Mater. A, De Leeuw R, Koyano K, Lavigne GJ, Svensson P,
2015;31:115–22. Manfredini D. International consensus on the assess-
73. Tobi H, Kreulen CM, Vondeling H, van Amerongen ment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. J Oral
WE. Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and Rehabil. 2018;45:837–44.
amalgam in the replacement of amalgam class II 87. Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael
restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview
1999;27:137–43. for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:476–94.
74. Smales RJ, Webster DA. Restoration deterioration 88. Perdigao J, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N, Carmo
related to later failure. Oper Dent. 1993;18:130–7. AR, Anauate-Netto C, Cordeiro HJ, Amore R,
75. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri Lewgoy HR. One-year clinical performance of self-
C. Durability of extensive class II open-sandwich etch adhesives in posterior restorations. Am J Dent.
restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer 2007;20:125–33.
cement after 6 years. Am J Dent. 2004;17:43–50. 89. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch ver-
76. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, sus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensi-
Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of tivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:1621–9.
posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J 90. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW, Halken J, Hallonsten
Dent. 2006;34:427–35. AL, Hoigaard R. A prospective 8-year follow-up of
77. van Dijken JW. Durability of resin composite resto- posterior resin composite restorations in permanent
rations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow- teeth of children and adolescents in public dental
up. J Dent. 2010;38:469–74. health service: reasons for replacement. Clin Oral
78. Pereira JT, Knorst JK, Ardenghi TM, Piva F, Investig. 2014;18:819–27.
Imparato JCP, Olegario IC, Hermoza RAM, Armas- 91. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares
Vega ADC, de Araujo FB. Pulp vitality and longevity M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus
of adhesive restorations are not affected by selective compomer/composite restorations in posterior pri-
10 Longevity of Resin Composite Restorations 141
mary and permanent teeth: findings from the New operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleak-
England Children’s amalgam trial. J Am Dent Assoc. age. Am J Dent. 1998a;11:229–34.
2007;138:763–72. 105. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot
92. da Silva Pereira RA, da Silva GR, Barcelos LM, EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitiv-
Cavalcanti K, Herval AM, Ardenghi TM, Soares ity in class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J
CJ. Practice-based analysis of direct posterior den- Dent. 1998b;26:555–62.
tal restorations performed in a public health service: 106. Chisini LA, Noronha TG, Ramos EC, Dos Santos-
retrospective long-term survival in Brazil. PLoS Junior RB, Sampaio KH, Faria ESAL, Correa
One. 2020;15:e0243288. MB. Does the skin color of patients influence the
93. Burke FJ, Lucarotti PS, Holder R. Outcome of direct treatment decision-making of dentists? A random-
restorations placed within the general dental services ized questionnaire-based study. Clin Oral Investig.
in England and Wales (part 4): influence of time and 2019;23:1023–30.
place. J Dent. 2005a;33:837–47. 107. Schwendicke F, Splieth C, Breschi L, Banerjee A,
94. Burke FJ, Lucarotti PS, Holder RL. Outcome of Fontana M, Paris S, Burrow MF, Crombie F, Page
direct restorations placed within the general dental LF, Gaton-Hernandez P, Giacaman R, Gugnani
services in England and Wales (part 2): variation by N, Hickel R, Jordan RA, Leal S, Lo E, Tassery H,
patients’ characteristics. J Dent. 2005b;33:817–26. Thomson WM, Manton DJ. When to intervene in the
95. Lucarotti PS, Holder RL, Burke FJ. Outcome of caries process? An expert Delphi consensus state-
direct restorations placed within the general dental ment. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:3691–703.
services in England and Wales (part 3): variation by 108. Coppola MN, Ozcan YA, Bogacki R. Evaluation
dentist factors. J Dent. 2005a;33:827–35. of performance of dental providers on posterior
96. Lucarotti PS, Holder RL, Burke FJ. Outcome of restorations: does experience matter? A data envel-
direct restorations placed within the general dental opment analysis (DEA) approach. J Med Syst.
services in England and Wales (part 1): variation 2003;27:445–56.
by type of restoration and re-intervention. J Dent. 109. Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst
2005b;33:805–15. EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior
97. Borba M, Della Bona A, Cecchetti D. Flexural resin composite restorations placed by dental stu-
strength and hardness of direct and indirect compos- dents. J Dent. 2004;32:379–83.
ites. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23:5–10. 110. McCracken MS, Gordan VV, Litaker MS,
98. Koytchev E, Yamaguchi S, Shin-No Y, Suzaki N, Funkhouser E, Fellows JL, Shamp DG, Qvist V,
Okamoto M, Imazato S, Datcheva M, Hayashi Meral JS, Gilbert GH, National Dental Practice-
M. Comprehensive micro-mechanical character- Based Research Network Collaborative G. A
ization of experimental direct core build-up resin 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based
composites with different amounts of filler contents. composite restorations: findings from the National
Dent Mater J. 2019;38:743–9. Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am
99. Borgia E, Baron R, Borgia JL. Quality and survival Dent Assoc. 2013;144:583–93.
of direct light-activated composite resin restorations 111. Ghoneim A, Yu B, Lawrence HP, Glogauer M,
in posterior teeth: a 5- to 20-year retrospective longi- Shankardass K, Quinonez C. Does competition
tudinal study. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e195–203. affect the clinical decision-making of dentists?
100. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A randomized 10-year A geospatial analysis. Community Dent Oral
prospective follow-up of class II nanohybrid and Epidemiol. 2020;48:152–62.
conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. J 112. Heaven TJ, Gordan VV, Litaker MS, Fellows JL,
Adhes Dent. 2014;16:585–92. Brad Rindal D, Firestone AR, Gilbert GH, National
101. Kramer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Feilzer AJ, Dental PCG. Agreement among dentists’ restorative
Frankenberger R. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid com- treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal
posite in extended class II cavities after six years. caries, primary proximal caries, and existing resto-
Dent Mater. 2011;27:455–64. rations: findings from the National Dental Practice-
102. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Kramer N. Nanohybrid Based Research Network. J Dent. 2013;41:718–25.
vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 113. Mjor IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement
8-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:125–37. and replacement of restorations in general dental
103. Matos TP, Gutierrez MF, Hanzen TA, Malaquias P, practice in Iceland. Oper Dent. 2002;27:117–23.
de Paula AM, de Souza JJ, Hass V, Fernandez E, 114. Casagrande L, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans
Reis A, Loguercio AD. A 18-Month clinical evalu- M, Opdam NJM. Repair may increase survival of
ation of a copper-containing universal adhesive in direct posterior restorations—a practice based study.
non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind, ran- J Dent. 2017;64:30–6.
domized controlled trial. J Dent. 2019;90:103219. 115. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA,
104. Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Class I Huysmans MC. Longevity of repaired restorations:
occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post- a practice based study. J Dent. 2012;40:829–35.
142 F. F. Demarco et al.
116. Kanzow P, Wiegand A. Retrospective analysis on 118. Wilson N, Lynch CD, Brunton PA, Hickel R, Meyer-
the repair vs. replacement of composite restorations. Lueckel H, Gurgan S, Pallesen U, Shearer AC,
Dent Mater. 2020;36:108–18. Tarle Z, Cotti E, Vanherle G, Opdam N. Criteria
117. van de Sande FH, Moraes RR, Elias RV, Montagner for the replacement of restorations: Academy of
AF, Rodolpho PA, Demarco FF, Cenci MS. Is com- Operative Dentistry European Section. Oper Dent.
posite repair suitable for anterior restorations? A 2016;41:S48–57.
long-term practice-based clinical study. Clin Oral
Investig. 2019;23:2795–803.
Color matching accuracy in dentistry is influenced by a variety of factors including observer competence, instrumental methods, lighting conditions, and the diversity of tooth structure. 1. Observer Competence: Color deficiencies in observers can affect shade matching precision, highlighting the need for screening for color vision deficiencies in dental training . Observer experience and training play a significant role; experienced observers tend to achieve better matching results . 2. Instrumental Methods: Technological devices such as spectrophotometers and colorimeters provide more objective and accurate shade matching compared to visual methods. Spectrophotometers measure light energy reflected from an object and are more accurate than colorimeters, which are subject to systematic errors . These instruments have been shown to offer a 33% increase in accuracy over conventional methods . 3. Lighting Conditions: Different light sources can vastly affect color perception due to varying wavelengths and color temperatures . Natural daylight, standardized at 5500 K, is recommended for color selection to ensure consistency . The variation in light conditions requires dentists to use standardized light sources or light-correcting devices for reliable results . 4. Tooth Structure: The inherent polychromatic nature of teeth, changes in color due to age, and the interaction of light with tooth tissues affect color matching. Teeth have different optical characteristics because of their structures like enamel and dentin, complicating color reproduction with restorative materials . Combining visual and instrumental assessments, accounting for individual observer ability, standardizing light conditions, and understanding the complex nature of tooth coloration are crucial for improving color matching accuracy in dentistry.
Crucial factors for ensuring the longevity of composite restorations include the use of hybrid or nanohybrid composites with low annual failure rates (AFR), the adoption of minimally invasive dentistry practices like repair and refurbishment over replacement, and the creation of a health-promoting environment that emphasizes preventive care and healthy patient behaviors . Additionally, operator-related factors such as skill, experience, and decision-making are vital, with more experienced clinicians often achieving better outcomes . Socioeconomic and patient-related factors such as caries risk, parafunction, and aesthetic demands further influence longevity . Moreover, utilizing adhesive systems effectively and managing clinical isolation properly also affect restoration success .
The primary reasons for failure in repaired composite restorations are secondary caries and tooth fracture. Secondary caries are the main reason for failure in both repaired and replaced restorations . Additionally, tooth fracture is particularly cited as a major reason for failure in repaired restorations . In repaired restorations, endodontic treatment, molar teeth, and patient-related factors such as age and bruxism also increase the risk of failure . In comparison, replaced restorations share similar failure reasons but generally involve more extensive intervention which leads to loss of sound tooth structure . Factors like cavity size, position of the tooth, and socioeconomic status significantly influence the risk of failure in both scenarios .
The long-term color stability of resin composites is influenced by several material characteristics including the composition of the resin matrix, photoinitiator systems, and filler content. Composites with higher inorganic filler content tend to exhibit less color change due to increased resistance against degradation processes like hydrolysis . The type of monomer used can also affect color stability; for example, BisEMA has shown lower color change due to its lower affinity for water . Additionally, the choice of photoinitiator impacts color stability; some studies suggest that alternatives to traditional camphorquinone systems might offer improved color stability, although results can vary depending on the formulation and exposure conditions . Furthermore, the inclusion of UV-light stabilizers in composites can mitigate discoloration linked to amine initiators . The surface roughness and hardness of the composite, often altered by factors such as polishing and exposure to different solutions, are also critical as increased surface roughness can accelerate pigment absorption and lead to color changes .
The annual failure rate (AFR) of dental restorations is influenced by the choice of restorative material, but several studies indicate that clinical, patient, and tooth-related factors may have a greater impact than the material itself. Resin composite restorations have an AFR ranging from 1-3% in posterior teeth and 1-5% in anterior teeth, with factors like secondary caries and fractures being common reasons for failure in posterior restorations . Repairs can reduce the AFR significantly; when repairs are not considered failures, restorations can show a reduced AFR, such as from 1.9% to 0.7% over 22 years . The type of composite can also impact AFR, with microhybrid composites showing an AFR as low as 0.4%, while microfilled materials can reach up to 26.3% . Clinical decision-making and patient-related factors, such as esthetic demands and risk of secondary caries, heavily influence the longevity of restorations more than the material properties, emphasizing the importance of considering a holistic approach for predicting restoration outcomes .
Digital instruments like spectrophotometers and colorimeters provide standardized and accurate color measurements, reducing subjective error and enhancing communication in dental shade matching . Spectrophotometers, in particular, offer a significant accuracy advantage over traditional visual methods, achieving a more objective match in 93.3% of cases . They are beneficial in standardizing and verifying shades, aiding both in clinical settings and research . However, these instruments require expensive and specific technology, which may not be readily available to all clinicians . In contrast, traditional visual methods, such as using a shade guide, are more accessible but prone to inconsistencies due to varying human perception and lighting conditions . Visual color matching is highly dependent on ambient conditions and the operator's skill and visual acuity , and it can be influenced by various subjective factors like fatigue and individual color perception differences . Therefore, while digital instruments improve accuracy, combining them with visual methods is often recommended to optimize color matching in dentistry .
Trends in dental restorations over the last decade have shown a significant focus on color matching and esthetics due to increased patient expectations for natural-looking restorations. Advances in color measurement and digital instruments have improved the ability to accurately match and reproduce the color of natural teeth in restorations . Additionally, the development of restorative materials with visual color adjustment potential has enhanced esthetic outcomes by allowing restorations to blend seamlessly with surrounding enamel and dentin, reducing color mismatches . These innovations in color matching have been driven by patient demands for functional and esthetically pleasing restorations, even though color may not be an explicit concern for patients but is crucial for the acceptance of dental treatments .
Selective caries removal is associated with improved longevity of dental restorations as it reduces the risk of pulp exposure and complications, leading to comparable survival rates as other excavation methods like stepwise removal in deep caries situations . A systematic review and clinical trials have shown similar survival rates for restorations after selective caries removal compared to non-selective approaches over periods of up to 33 months . However, mixed results have been reported, particularly in primary teeth, where some studies indicate a reduction in restoration longevity due to selective caries removal . Overall, the method is beneficial in reducing pulp exposure and maintaining restoration viability, particularly for permanent teeth .
Differences in age-related dental composition significantly impact tooth color perception. As people age, the thickness of the enamel decreases due to wear, making the dentin underneath more visible. Dentin itself is darker and has increased chroma, leading to a perceived darkening of the tooth color . This process is exacerbated by physiologic deposition of secondary dentin, which further increases the tooth's chroma and decreases its color value . Additionally, older teeth display lower translucency than younger teeth, which contributes to the difference in perceived color . Since younger teeth have a thicker enamel layer, they typically appear lighter or have a higher value color . Consequently, age-related changes in dental composition lead to a progressive darkening of tooth color over time due to the increasing prominence of the underlying dentin ."}
The use of a polarizing filter does not directly assist in dental shade matching. It primarily aids in visualizing internal details of the teeth, which can be useful for future characterization and layering, but does not enhance the actual shade matching process itself . The filter works by eliminating reflections, thereby allowing better visualization of the teeth's internal features , but it is not a tool for improving the match of shades itself.