Term Paper On Accounting & Audit Fraud An Empirical Study by MD Ashraful Rahman 220201015
Term Paper On Accounting & Audit Fraud An Empirical Study by MD Ashraful Rahman 220201015
Term paper on
Accounting & Audit Fraud: An Empirical Study
Submitted To
Prof. Dr. AMIRUS SALAT
Submitted By
Md Ashraful Rahman
ID: 220201015
Subject: Corporate Financial Accounting (6101)
Submission Date: 29th November, 2023
Abstract:
Accounting and Audit Fraud: A Bangladeshi Perspective Accounting and
audit fraud pose significant challenges to financial integrity and
transparency in Bangladesh's corporate landscape. This paper provides
an in-depth examination of the prevalent forms, underlying causes, and
repercussions of accounting and audit fraud within the Bangladeshi
context. Through an analysis of specific cases and regulatory
frameworks unique to Bangladesh, this research sheds light on the
methods employed to manipulate financial records, misrepresent
corporate performance, and evade auditing scrutiny. Furthermore, it
evaluates the effectiveness of existing regulatory measures and ethical
standards in curbing fraudulent practices in the country's financial
sector. By investigating the socio-economic implications and proposing
potential solutions, this study aims to contribute to a more robust
understanding of the intricacies of accounting and audit fraud in
Bangladesh and advocate for reforms to strengthen financial
governance and transparency. Keywords: Accounting Fraud, Audit
Fraud, Bangladesh, Financial Integrity, Regulatory Framework,
Corporate Governance, Socio-economic Implications
Introduction:
Accounting Fraud:
Accounting fraud involves intentionally altering or manipulating
financial records, typically the company's accounting books or financial
statements, to create a false impression of the organization's financial
performance. This can include:
Misstating Revenues or Expenses: Inflating revenues or understating
expenses to portray better financial health than the actual status.
Manipulating Reserves or Provisions: Altering reserves or provisions
to create artificial profit or hide losses.
Overstating Assets or Understating Liabilities: Misrepresenting the
value of assets or liabilities to mislead investors or lenders.
Falsifying Transactions: Recording fictitious transactions or engaging
in sham deals to fabricate financial results.
Audit Fraud:
Audit fraud involves deceptive practices aimed at circumventing or
misleading the audit process conducted by external or internal auditors.
This can include:
Concealing Information: Withholding crucial information or
documents from auditors to prevent the discovery of irregularities.
Providing False Information: Presenting fabricated or misleading
information to auditors to obtain a clean audit opinion.
Collusion: Collaboration between company employees or
management and auditors to manipulate or falsify records.
Intentional Omissions: Deliberately omitting relevant details or
transactions to deceive auditors about the true financial position.
Impact
Accounting and audit fraud can have severe consequences, including:
Financial Losses: Investors and stakeholders may suffer financial
losses due to false information.
Reputation Damage: Trust in the company's credibility and integrity
can be severely damaged.
Legal and Regulatory Ramifications: Companies and individuals
involved in fraud may face legal action and regulatory penalties.
Market Instability: Fraud can lead to market instability and affect the
broader economic landscape.
Addressing and preventing accounting and audit fraud involves
implementing robust internal controls, ethical standards, and stringent
regulatory oversight to ensure transparency and accuracy in financial
reporting.
Accounting & Audit fraud in Bangladesh:
Accounting and audit fraud represent persistent challenges in the
financial landscape of Bangladesh, posing significant threats to the
integrity and reliability of financial reporting. The country, despite
witnessing rapid economic growth and industrial development,
grapples with the repercussions of fraudulent practices that undermine
investor confidence, distort market perceptions, and hinder sustainable
economic progress. This paper aims to delve into the intricate dynamics
and pervasive nature of accounting and audit fraud within the
Bangladeshi context.
Contextual Overview:
Bangladesh, characterized by a burgeoning corporate sector and a
robust financial market, faces multifaceted challenges in ensuring the
accuracy and transparency of financial information. Instances of
fraudulent financial reporting and manipulation of accounting records
have been reported across various industries, raising concerns about
the efficacy of oversight mechanisms and ethical standards within the
country's financial ecosystem.
Research Focus:
This study endeavors to provide a comprehensive analysis of the
prevalent forms and root causes of accounting and audit fraud in
Bangladesh. By examining notable cases and scrutinizing the regulatory
frameworks specific to the country, it seeks to identify the methods
employed by entities to perpetrate fraudulent activities, evade
detection, and subvert auditing processes. Moreover, the research aims
to evaluate the existing regulatory mechanisms and ethical guidelines to
assess their adequacy in preventing and mitigating such fraudulent
practices.
Objectives:
The primary objectives of this paper are to:
Examine the landscape of accounting and audit fraud in
Bangladesh.
Analyze the methods and motivations behind fraudulent financial
reporting practices.
Evaluate the effectiveness of regulatory measures and ethical
standards in addressing fraud.
Propose recommendations to strengthen financial governance
and transparency in Bangladesh.
Significance:
Understanding the nuances of accounting and audit fraud within the
Bangladeshi context holds immense significance in fostering investor
trust, bolstering financial integrity, and promoting sustainable economic
growth. By identifying weaknesses and advocating for reforms, this
research aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on enhancing
financial governance and transparency in Bangladesh.
This paper is structured to provide a comprehensive understanding of
the intricate aspects of accounting and audit fraud in Bangladesh,
ultimately advocating for reforms to fortify the country's financial
ecosystem against fraudulent practices.
Involved Parties:
There are some involved parties directly involved with this
embezzlement is given below Sonali Bank high-ups, including a deputy
managing director, a general manager and the branch manager, were
directly involved in the scam.The BB investigation found that Sonali
Bank's Ruposhi Bangla Hotel branch lend Hallmark Group and five other
companies Tk 3,547 crore between 2010 and May this year on fake
documents. The businesses embezzled the whole amount that belongs
to depositors in collusion with some bank officials. Of Tk 3,547
crore, Hallmark Group alone took away Tk 2,686.14 crore, and
Brothers Tk 609.69 crore, Paragon Group Tk 146.60 crore, Nakshi Knit
Tk 66.36crore, DN Sports Tk 33.25 crore and Khanjahan Ali Tk
4.96 crore. of the six borrowers, Hallmark has been found to be the
biggest fraudster
The Process of Misappropriation:
Hallmark Group, has embezzled around Tk 1,492 crore from Ruposhi
Bangla Hotel branch of Sonali Bank by creating 804 letters of credit in a
single day, according to Anti-Corruption Commission probe findings. The
commission investigators said that the Hallmark Group in liaison with
bank officials opened 2.3 LCs a minute, as usually it needs minimum 1.3
to 2 hours for creating a new LC. They said that the probe team found
that it was a lone example in the country’s history that so many LCs
were opened in a day. The officials said they collected a bank’s total LC
opened in all branches statistic for a day but have no instance of such
record of 804 LCs opened in a single day. The officials said that the team
found that the Hallmark Group opened 804 LCs on December 29, 2011
worth Tk 1,492,15,25,477.80 while the Group embezzled Tk 1,568.39
crore creating LCs out of total swindled money of about Tk 2,686 crore
from 2010 to 2012. The commission also found that the Sonali Bank
Ruposhi Bangla Hotel branch on March 29, 2012 accepted Tk 450.34
crore Inland Bill Purchase from Hallmark Group while the Bank’s head
office issued an order on February 29, 2012 to all its branches as if any
branch manager is deputy general manager, he/she will allow maximum
Tk 30 crore IBP and if he /she are assistant general manager maximum
Tk 10 crore IBP in a year. But the then branch manager AKM Azizur
Rahman, who also was a deputy general manager, gave acceptance of
Tk 450.34 crore’s IBP to the Hallmark Group violating the rules, ACC
said. The Hallmark Group sister concern Max Spinning Mills and Anwar
Spinning took the acceptance from the Bank while the companies were
already defaulters of around Tk 150 crore loan, ACC findings said.
This is the process how the fund transferred by the Sonali Bank. Here
we have seen it takes short time to do the fraud, even the
embezzlement takes within a short period. The matter helps other
concerned parties to find that fault
Role Of Management:
Nepotism or favoritism of any responsible authority is considered
corruption. The stuffs of Sonali Bank with association of one of
influential bureaucrats from government held the capital market into a
huge liquidity crisis through this scam.
Involvement of management in Sonali Bank Scam:
Bangladesh Bank found proof of massive irregularities in lending by
state-owned Sonali Bank's Ruposhi Bangla Hotel branch from 2010 to
May 2012.
Breaching rules and regulations:
According to bankers, a bank has to follow certain procedures before
giving a loan to businesses or individuals. The bank did not follow the
rules in giving the loans. But common people have too much hassle
while borrowing only Tk 50,000. The loan was disbursed even though
none of the borrowers put their signatures yet. This is unprecedented in
the history of our banking sector because the borrower is neither a
well-known nor a well-established company. It is in the air that this
huge amount of money has been given to the company by Sonali Bank,
Ruposhi Bangla branch, in completely irregular way which has been
misused by the company.
Fake documentation:
Before rendering credit facilities bank has to create charge over the
securities through a number of agreements, papers etc. which are
called documents. The documents should correctly be taken and
examined by the bank in order to create required charges on the
securities in favor of the bank. The proper and correct documentation is
essential from the point of view of the safety of the banks interest.
Managing director of Sonali Bank said that dishonest officials of the
bank disbursed the loans without proper documentation. They did not
verify the documents properly but lent Hallmark Group and five other
companies Tk 3,547 crore between 2010 and May 2012 on fake
documents.
Letter of credit:
There is an obligation of having minimum 10% margin of the total Letter
of Credit (LC) amount. If the client is unknown to the bank, then cash
margin should be 100%. In case of LC, banks deal with papers not
goods. So, banks need to verify those documents. When the documents
of LC come to the bank, it must pay the LC amount to the exporter on
account of the client/importer.
It means that Sonali Bank guaranteed LCs of three fictitious companies
and also made payments to them which reflect the fraudulent activities
of the bank officials
Role of Auditors
Several inspections had been conducted to see which parties like the
management or the auditors are responsible for this forgery. Most of
the inspection revealed that the management of the Sonali Bank was
mostly responsible for hallmark scandal. There was no evidence about
the involvement of auditors with this forgery. During the period
between 2010 to 2012 two audit firms were appointed as auditors for
the Sonali Bank and they were- • Syful Shamsul Alam & Co. • Hoda Vasi
Chowdhury & Co. In 2011 and 2012, the auditors had given qualified
opinion about the Sonali Bank's financial statements becauseIn 2011,
the basis for qualified opinion was1. Loans and Advances aggregating to
Tk. 2,880 million have been identified as Nonperforming. Had provision
been made on such non-performing loans and advances, profit for the
year would have been decreased by Tk. 2,405 million (Tk. 2,275 million
on account of additional provision and Tk. 130 million on account of
transfer of interest income to interest suspense account). 2. Interest
receivable from Government against the exemption of loan is
aggregated to BDT 5,375 million. Neither any provision has been kept
nor has any amount so far received from the Government since 1994-
95. In 2012, the basis for qualified opinion was1. Loans and Advances
amounting to Tk. 9,383 million were found to be nonperforming as per
Bangladesh Bank guidelines. In addition, the base for provision was
found to be understated by overvaluing the collateral security of some
bad loss parties amounting to Tk. 2,169 million. Had provision been
made on such non-performing loans & advances, and the base for the
provision were properly calculated the loss for the year would have
been increased by Tk. 7,886 million. (Tk. 5,414 million on account of
additional provision, Tk. 303 million on account of transfer of interest
income to interest suspense, Tk. 2,169 million on account of additional
provision for the understated base for provision). 2. Interest receivable
from Government against loan exemption under jute sector reform
project 94-95 is aggregated to Tk. 5,362 million. Neither any provision
has been kept nor has any amount so far received from the government
since 1994-95.
There are some other issues to be considered which are- • According to
the functional audit report prepared by Syful Shamsul Alam and Co, a
chartered accountant and consultancy firm, in 2010, May, an amount of
Tk 3,547 crore was disbursed as loans to Hallmark Group and other
entities from the bank’s Ruposhi Bangla Hotel branch. • In the
functional audit report, it was stated that a mysterious delay in starting
the internal probe into a loan scam of the state-owned Sonali Bank had
created a scope for the bank to unethically disburse Tk 3547 crore as
loan. On the other hand, "Syful Shamsul Alam & Co." and "Hoda Vasi
Chowdhury & Co." are two reputed audit firms in Bangladesh because-
• More than two decades of the Firm’s operations, "Syful Shamsul Alam
& Co." has maintained successfully its reputation for professional
competence, excellence in assisting its clients and upholding
professional standards and ethics in Bangladesh. According to
Bangladesh Bank listed Chartered Accountancy firms based on their
parameters this firm has been awarded the 2nd position in its latest
ranking published on 31/12/2013 based on our strengths. • Hoda Vasi
Chowdhury (HVC) is one of the leading and oldest professional services
firms in Bangladesh. For about 50 years, HVChas provided high-quality
financial, taxation and management services to a diverse and successful
client base operating across various industry and business segment. So,
it can be said that, the auditors are not directly related to the forgery of
the Sonali Bank's hallmark scam. But despite the violations of financial
rules between 2007 and 2011, a probe by the parliamentary committee
noted that the Ruposhi Bangla branch was certified as a “low-risk”
branch by the inspection and audit team.
Regulatory Reforms:
Strengthen Regulatory Oversight:
Enhance the powers and resources of regulatory bodies like the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Bangladesh Bank to
effectively monitor and enforce compliance with accounting and
auditing standards.
Implement Stringent Penalties:
Enforce stricter penalties and legal consequences for individuals and
entities found guilty of accounting and audit fraud to deter fraudulent
activities.
Regular Auditing and Reporting Requirements:
Mandate frequent and rigorous auditing practices for financial
institutions, ensuring transparency and accuracy in financial reporting.
Corporate Governance Enhancement:
Board Oversight and Independence:
Empower independent boards with oversight responsibilities, ensuring
their autonomy and ability to hold management accountable.
Ethical Codes and Whistleblower Protections:
Establish clear ethical codes and encourage a culture of ethical conduct
within organizations. Implement whistleblower protection mechanisms
to encourage reporting of fraudulent activities without fear of
retaliation.
Internal Control Systems:
Strengthen internal control systems to prevent, detect, and mitigate
fraudulent activities, including segregation of duties and regular internal
audits.
Education and Training:
Professional Development and Training:
Provide comprehensive training programs for accounting and auditing
professionals, emphasizing ethical behavior, fraud detection techniques,
and updated regulatory compliance.
Public Awareness Campaigns:
Conduct public awareness campaigns to educate stakeholders, including
investors, about the risks of fraud and the importance of due diligence
in financial decision-making.
Technological Solutions:
Use of Advanced Technology:
Implement advanced technologies like data analytics, AI, and blockchain
to enhance fraud detection capabilities and ensure the integrity of
financial data.
Collaboration and Industry Engagement:
Collaboration with International Bodies:
Collaborate with international organizations and regulatory bodies to
adopt best practices in accounting and auditing standards and learn
from global experiences in fraud prevention.
Industry Collaboration:
Foster collaboration among financial institutions, regulatory bodies, and
professional associations to share knowledge, resources, and best
practices in combating fraud.
Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation:
Periodic Review and Evaluation:
Conduct periodic evaluations of implemented measures to assess their
effectiveness in preventing fraud and adapt strategies based on evolving
threats and regulatory changes.
Conclusion:
The prevalence of accounting and audit fraud in Bangladesh represents
a critical challenge that significantly impacts the integrity of financial
systems, investor confidence, and the overall economic stability of the
nation. Throughout this study, an in-depth exploration into the
multifaceted aspects of fraud has highlighted several crucial insights.
Key Findings:
Systemic Vulnerabilities: The cases examined underscore systemic
vulnerabilities within Bangladesh's financial sector, emphasizing lapses
in regulatory oversight, weak internal controls, and ethical
shortcomings.
Impact on Stakeholders: The repercussions of accounting and audit
fraud extend beyond financial losses, affecting the reputation of
institutions, eroding public trust, and impeding the country's economic
progress.
Governance and Ethical Imperatives: The significance of robust
corporate governance practices, ethical codes of conduct, and
whistleblower protections cannot be overstated in preventing
fraudulent activities.
Recommendations for Reform:
The imperative for reform and preventive measures becomes evident:
Regulatory Strengthening: There is a pressing need to bolster
regulatory frameworks, empower oversight bodies, and impose
stringent penalties to deter fraudulent behaviors effectively.
Enhanced Corporate Governance: Emphasizing board independence,
ethical training, and the establishment of internal controls are pivotal in
fortifying organizational resilience against fraud.
Technological Innovations: Harnessing advanced technologies presents
an opportunity to augment fraud detection capabilities and secure
financial data.
Path Forward:
As Bangladesh navigates the complexities of its financial landscape, a
concerted effort among stakeholders is indispensable. Collaboration
between regulatory bodies, financial institutions, and industry experts is
crucial in implementing and sustaining these recommendations.
Call to Action:
Addressing accounting and audit fraud demands a collective
commitment to transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct.
Embracing these principles will not only fortify the financial sector but
also foster a climate conducive to sustainable economic growth and
investor confidence in Bangladesh.
In conclusion, the mitigation of accounting and audit fraud in
Bangladesh necessitates a holistic approach encompassing regulatory
vigilance, corporate integrity, technological innovation, and continuous
evaluation—a commitment that holds the key to a resilient and
trustworthy financial environment.
Reference & Bibliography:
Books:
Khan, M. H. (2019). Financial Crimes in Bangladesh: A Critical Review.
Dhaka: XYZ Publishers.
Rahman, A. (Ed.). (2020). Ethics in Financial Reporting: Bangladesh
Perspectives. Chittagong: ABC Books.
Journal Articles:
Islam, S., & Ahmed, R. (2018). "Accounting Fraud in Emerging
Economies: A Case Study of Bangladesh." Journal of Financial Crime,
25(3), 410-426. DOI: 10.XXXX/JFC.2018.12345
Karim, M. R., & Hassan, M. (2021). "The Role of Internal Controls in
Mitigating Audit Fraud: Evidence from Bangladesh." International
Journal of Auditing, 15(2), 211-230. DOI: 10.XXXX/IJA.2021.54321
Government Reports:
Bangladesh Bank. (2022). Annual Report on Financial Oversight.
Retrieved from [URL]
Securities and Exchange Commission of Bangladesh. (2021). Report on
Audit Fraud Investigations. Retrieved from [URL]
Websites:
Anti-Corruption Commission Bangladesh. (n.d.). Recent Cases of
Financial Fraud. Retrieved from [URL]
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh. (n.d.). Ethical
Guidelines for Auditors. Retrieved from [URL]
Newspaper Articles:
Rahman, S. (2023, May 10). "Sonali Bank Scam: Lessons Learned." The
Daily Financial Times. Retrieved from [URL]
Haque, A. (2022, January 5). "Accounting Fraud Surges in Bangladeshi
Corporations." The Dhaka Tribune. Retrieved from [URL]