COPC 2021 CX Standard For Customer Operations Release 7.0
COPC 2021 CX Standard For Customer Operations Release 7.0
RELEASE 7.0
VERSION 1.0
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................. 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Why Get Certified to the COPC CX Standard? ....................................................................................... 13
Looking Forward: Strategic Direction .................................................................................................... 19
1.0 Leadership and Planning (400 Points)................................................................................ 20
1.1 Setting Direction (100 Points) ............................................................................................. 20
1.2 Developing Business Plans (100 Points) .............................................................................. 20
1.3 Setting Targets (100 Points) ................................................................................................ 21
1.4 Reviewing Business Performance (100 Points) ................................................................... 21
2.0 Processes (1000 Points) .................................................................................................... 22
2.1 Gathering and Analyzing Customer Information (80 Points) .............................................. 22
2.2 Defining Service Journeys and Key Customer-Related Processes (80 Points) .................... 23
2.3 Analyzing and Managing Service Journeys (80 Points) ....................................................... 23
2.4 Forecasting and Capacity Planning (80 Points) ................................................................... 24
2.5 Scheduling and Real Time Management (80 Points) .......................................................... 25
2.6 Managing IT Services (80 Points) ........................................................................................ 26
2.7 Managing Quality (80 Points) .............................................................................................. 26
2.8 Managing Corrective Action and Continuous Improvement (80 Points) ............................ 27
2.9 Minimizing Process Variation (60 Points) ........................................................................... 28
2.10 Managing Knowledge and Content (60 Points) ................................................................ 28
2.11 Managing Vendors and Key Suppliers (40 Points) ............................................................ 29
2.12 Establishing Business Continuity Plans (40 Points) ........................................................... 29
2.13 Implementing and Controlling Changes (40 Points) ......................................................... 30
2.14 Ensuring Data Privacy and Compliance (40 Points) .......................................................... 30
2.15 Reporting and Data Integrity (40 Points) .......................................................................... 31
2.16 Reviewing COPC CX Standard (40 Points) ......................................................................... 31
3.0 People (600 Points) .......................................................................................................... 32
3.1 Defining Jobs (60 Points) ..................................................................................................... 32
3.2 Recruiting and Hiring (80 Points) ........................................................................................ 32
3.3 Training and Development (80 Points) ............................................................................... 32
3.4 Verifying Skills and Knowledge (80 Points) ......................................................................... 33
3.5 Monitoring and Coaching CSSs (80 points) ......................................................................... 33
3.6 Managing Staff Performance (80 Points) ............................................................................ 33
3.7 Managing Employee Experience and Feedback (60 Points) ............................................... 34
3.8 Reducing Attrition and Absenteeism (80 Points) ................................................................ 34
4.0 Performance (2000 Points) ............................................................................................... 35
4.1 Customer Experience Performance (500 Points) ................................................................ 35
4.2 Overall Cost Performance (200 Points) ............................................................................... 35
4.3 Human Assisted Channel Performance (400 Points) .......................................................... 36
4.4 Digital Assisted Channel Performance (350 Points) ............................................................ 36
4.5 Key Support Process (KSP) Performance (200 Points) ........................................................ 37
4.6 Achieving Results (350 Points) ............................................................................................ 37
COPC CX Standard Certification Process ................................................................................................ 39
COPC CX Standard Scoring System ........................................................................................................ 40
The COPC Customer Experience (CX) Standard for Customer Operations is a rigorous management system
and quality management framework for CX operations. Originally designed for contact centers, the
Standard now covers all the channels used by customers to interact with CX operations throughout a service
journey. The Standard is adopted and used by buyers of CX operations and support services to optimize the
procurement and management of these services. Buyers often require providers get certified to the COPC
CX Standard for Contact Centers to drive proven levels of high performance. Buyers certify to the COPC CX
Standard for Vendor Management Organizations (VMOs) to strengthen their organization and hold
themselves accountable for high performance vendor management.
Service Providers leverage the Standard as their management system for a high-performance organization.
Use of the Standard facilitates a faster path to sustainable high performance and is accompanied by
recognition of achievement in the market. Certification is challenging and requires a commitment to high
performance but yields great rewards driving up customer satisfaction, efficiency, and revenue. To support
success, COPC Inc. provides a variety of trainings designed to enable team members to build an organization
capable of COPC Certification, high performance, and ongoing performance improvement.
Adoption of the COPC CX Standard fundamentally improves an organization’s approach to high performance
and creates a systematic and lasting ability to drive continuous improvement even for those not seeking
certification.
Introduction
COPC Customer Experience (CX) Standard for Customer Operations is a performance management system
for setting a CX vision, developing best-practice based strategies to achieve that vision, and managing
customer experience operations to peak performance. It offers a set of management practices and key
measurements for operations that are involved in managing the customer experience through a single
channel or across multiple channels during the service journey that customers undertake to resolve their
issues.
The mission of every Customer Experience (CX) operation is simple — to fulfill the needs of customers
quickly, cost effectively, and with as little customer effort as possible. The path customers take to resolve an
issue, as well as the experiences they have along the way, is known as the service journey. It differs from
what many know as the customer journey as it applies to customer-facing activities and non-customer-
facing activities that impact the customer experience and outcome. The service journey includes all the
steps and communication methods a customer uses, and the tools and logistics a business or contact center
employs to complete the service process. For operations, this helps promote greater efficiency, improved
performance, and reduced cost. For customers, this means reduced effort, improved satisfaction, and
enhanced loyalty.
Provide users a management system and quality management framework with proven processes to
design, evaluate and manage multichannel CX operations.
Improve the customer experience through better insights into customers’ requirements and
expectations and through alignment of systems, processes, and technology to meet these
expectations.
Increase revenue (for operations that are revenue-driven).
Reduce the cost of providing excellent service.
Companies that successfully implement the COPC CX Standard for Customer Operations will significantly
improve the customer experience and increase sales while lowering costs. COPC Inc. offers training that will
provide company staff the knowledge and capabilities to design, manage and maintain a high performance
CX operation.
One of the advantages of a globally accepted performance management system and set of standards is the
establishment of a consistent “industry vocabulary.”
The COPC CX Standards are based on key terminology and relationships specific to managing customer
experience operations. The list below defines the most commonly used terms within the COPC CX
Standards. Understanding these foundational terms and relationships ensures consistent and relevant use
of the COPC CX Standards. Additional terms and definitions are included in the glossary of terms at the end
of this document.
Figure 1. This diagram depicts how service is ultimately provided to an end user, or customer, the
organizations involved, and the channels through which service is provided. Below are descriptions of
each.
CSPs provide services to customers on behalf of internal Clients who are part of the same organization. CSPs
encompass most, if not all, types of service environments.
OSPs are third parties that are contracted by Clients to provide services to customers on their behalf. Like
CSPs, OSPs encompass many types of service environments.
Clients
Clients may be the companies that hire OSPs to provide products and services to their customers. Clients
may also be defined as the groups within companies that obtain services from one or more “sister” groups,
divisions, departments, or teams within the same company.
Customers
Customers are the end users of an organization’s products or services. Customers may be consumers,
businesses, field organizations, or the retailers, distributors, and specialists that encompass a distribution
channel.
The path taken by a customer end to end, interacting with any combination of company human and digital
assisted contact points and resources required to resolve a customer request or need.
VMOs are organizational units or groups of individuals within a company, typically within the Client
company, responsible for managing at least a portion of the company’s customer experience programs.
Typically, VMOs manage OSPs, but may also manage CSPs, shared services such as Workforce Management.
Digital assisted channels are contact points where customers direct their service transactions without
interaction with a Customer Service/Support Staff representative (CSS). These channels are also referred to
as digital channels. Examples include self-service solutions such as web-based services, self-service by
specific systems such as in-location systems, phone-based systems, or digital applications.
Human assisted channels are those in which the service is provided by a Customer Service/ Support Staff
(CSS) representative who helps the customer. Service is typically provided through phone, email, chat,
social media, or in-location staff.
Additional terms used in the COPC CX Standard are defined in the Glossary.
The reasons for this high level of global adoption and use include:
It works! Users of the COPC CX Standard have improved the customer experience and revenue,
increased service and quality, and reduced costs.
By expanding the COPC CX Standard to all customer contact channels, Release 7.0 provides all types
of customer experience operations the necessary tools to improve the customer experience while
increasing revenue and containing cost.
For organizations providing multichannel customer service, the COPC CX Standard provides a
structure to coordinate and bring uniformity across channels to give customers a consistent
experience as they navigate their service journey to a successful resolution.
Cost is different from price. Price represents what a CSP might charge for its services, or the cost
burden transferred to the parent corporation.
These operations are often referred to as “call” centers. However, most of these customer contact
operations interact with customers via phone, digital means (e.g., email, web, chat, SMS, social media,
video), or traditional mail. Typical services provided include customer service, technical support [Tech],
reservations, operator services, sales, fulfilment, and others.
These operations typically process large volumes of transactions that may or may not directly touch
customers. They include new account set-up and activation, records management, claims processing,
redemption, and other similar functions.
These operations provide service and support to customers who come to a physical location for service.
Examples include retail stores, walk-in support or billing service, banks, medical centers, or assistance
centers.
These include operations that dispatch service technicians to customer locations, typically to perform
installations or repairs or deliver products.
These operations are responsible for delivering customer service through digital assisted channels such as
online services, mobile apps, self-help kiosks, and chatbots.
The original COPC CX Standard (formerly known as the COPC CSP Standard) was developed in 1996 by
buyers, providers, and senior managers responsible for operational management of customer-centric
service operations. Not satisfied with the performance of existing operations and the lack of commonly
known and understood operational guidelines, these individuals worked together to fill the void and move
the industry forward. Among the development team were:
Leading technology companies that outsource and operate customer contact operations that
provide sales, customer service, order management, technical support, and other functions (i.e.,
Microsoft, Compaq, Intel, Novell, and Dell).
Companies known for their excellent service provided by their own internally managed customer
contact operations in the areas of sales, customer service, distribution/fulfillment operations,
payment processing, and other services (i.e., American Express, L.L. Bean, and Motorola).
Individuals with extensive experience in operations management and performance improvement.
This experience included a Judge for the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award and senior
management from firms in both the contact center and manufacturing industries who had achieved
ISO certification for their firms.
The development team used the criteria and systems of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award in the
United States as the foundation for the original COPC CX Standard. To meet the unique needs of the CSP
industry, the team then adapted the Baldrige criteria to accommodate the practical realities by:
Emphasizing or adding processes, measures, and results most important to CSPs, their Clients and
Customers.
Excluding portions of the criteria that, based on CSP and Client experience, did not readily
contribute to the goals of the COPC CX Standard.
Including from other worldwide standards those components that better addressed practical
performance improvement approaches.
Structuring the COPC CX Standard to encompass not only high-performance approaches, but also
the extent of the deployment of these approaches within the organization. Well-designed
approaches that are pervasively deployed will lead to sustained high levels of performance.
Approaches are the processes, practices, and procedures used to meet the requirements of the
COPC CX Standard.
Deployment refers to how extensively these approaches are used throughout the CSP or OSP
organization.
There are three versions of the COPC CX Standard, each endorsed by the Standards Committee:
The COPC CX Standard for Customer Operations is the comprehensive performance management
system for CSPs that is focused on achieving high levels of performance for all kinds of service
journeys customers use to get their issues resolved. The COPC CX Standard for Customer
Operations is a proven framework CSPs use to balance business outcomes across the many service
The COPC CX Standard for Contact Centers is the comprehensive performance management system
for 3rd party contact center outsource service providers and can be used by internal contact center
organizations. The Items in the COPC CX Standard for Contact Centers reflect those areas the COPC
Standards Committee (see The COPC Standards Committee) believes, and verified through an
industry survey, contribute most significantly to achieving high levels of performance. The
objectives of the COPC CX Standard for Contact Centers are to:
o Provide high-performing OSPs with a level of recognition that will distinguish them as
among the best in the world.
o Provide the industry with a model to use to drive high performance.
The COPC CX Standard for Vendor Management Organizations (VMOs) is the comprehensive
performance management system for VMOs that is endorsed by the COPC Standards Committee. In
2002, the COPC Standards Committee determined that the ability of CSPs and OSPs to achieve high
levels of performance was limited by the performance of their (internal and external) clients on
mission-critical deliverables such as forecasts and product/process-related training. To address this
gap, the COPC Standards Committee developed the COPC CX Standard for VMOs, which defines the
key processes a VMO must perform and the related metrics a VMO must measure and manage to
ensure high levels of VMO and OSP performance.
Each of these versions of the COPC CX Standard are available on COPC Inc.’s web site: (www.copc.com).
Release 7.0 of the COPC CX Standard is a major revision reflecting the continued and substantial impact of
digital technologies in servicing customers and the necessity and ability to measure and manage the
complete service journey for an optimized customer experience. COPC Inc.’s performance management
system is applied to all types of customer contact operations, including both human and digital assisted
channels. This marks the COPC CX Standards continued evolution to meet the dynamic needs of the
customer contact industry. As has been the practice since the COPC CX Standard was first developed,
revisions are only made by the COPC Standards Committee.
The COPC CX Standard and related certification processes are governed by the COPC Standards Committee.
This independent group is comprised of individuals who have senior management responsibility at their
organizations and are deeply knowledgeable of the COPC CX Standard through direct experience of using
the COPC CX Standard in their operations.
The COPC CX Standard is a comprehensive and integrated system for managing a customer centric CX
operation.
The COPC CX Standard begins with the drivers of customer-focused performance management
embodied in the leadership characteristics and activities described in Category 1.0 Leadership and
Planning.
Taken together, Category 2.0 Processes and Category 3.0 People represent the organization’s enablers:
a skilled and motivated work force using well-designed technology and processes and managing these
to optimal levels of performance.
The goal of the system is a balanced composite of customer experience, product and service
performance, and productivity addressed in Category 4.0 Performance.
Objective measures in place for all activities that directly impact customers and clients.
A demonstrated capability to achieve a majority of their performance targets.
Performance improvement methodologies that have been demonstrated to produce results.
A system that allows Enterprise and customer contact operations management to verify that the
operation is actively monitoring and managing the system over time to improve performance.
The COPC CX Standards describe performance management approaches that a CSP must institute and
defines the metrics used to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of its approaches. They are
sustainable performance management systems for CSPs. The COPC CX Standard links a CSP’s customer-
centered performance objectives with its operational processes and the people who manage and maintain
them. The objectives, processes, and people are in turn linked to the statement of direction and plans that
propel and sustain them. This integration ensures that customer focus and efficiency drive performance,
behavior, and direction. Enterprise and Customer-driven excellence and efficiency are the desired end-
states for all CSPs that adopt the COPC CX Standard as a performance management and improvement
system.
Many CSPs seek to institute these practices and track these measures to become compliant with the
requirements of the COPC CX Standard. This compliance is assessed and verified during the COPC CX
Standard certification process, which requires a comprehensive audit by COPC Inc. or its licensees or
Implementation Partners. Certified compliance with the COPC CX Standard is a major near-term objective
for many companies that use this document.
Some VMOs require their OSPs to seek certification to the COPC CX Standard to ensure consistent high-
performance approaches and results.
Once certified COPC Inc. and the COPC Standards Committee recognizes success. Certified entities are
added to the COPC Inc. website noting certification attainment with a description of the certified entity.
COPC Inc. shares across major news wires the success of the entity with congratulations from COPC Inc. and
the COPC Standards Committee. The entity also receives a physical trophy and digital badge to
commemorate and share the achievement.
This section is intended to provide a guide to help users quantify savings or gains in revenue or collections; it
identifies where common opportunities lie and the financial benefits of implementing the COPC CX Standard
as a performance management system.
Savings
Improvements in Quality
Increase in Issue Resolution / First Contact Resolution (FCR): Solving problems and issues more
frequently during the first contact, will lead to less repeat transactions and therefore into a reduced
requirement for CSSs or other operatives.
Cost of Poor Quality: There is often a cost of getting things wrong, which can be measured through
calculating the cost of what we do to compensate customers that have had a bad experience with the
customer contact operation, the cost of rework to fix the issue and of having to handle repeat
interactions. Examples include giving the customer extra time on their subscription, giving free store
vouchers, free product, direct financial compensation, expedited delivery (at a higher cost to the CSP),
removal of handling charges. Poor quality increases the cost of doing business, thus lowering profit
margins. Poor quality also increases customer effort (i.e., as they seek resolution or remediation), which
has been shown to negatively impact customer loyalty.
Improvements in Efficiency
Average Handle Time (AHT): By decreasing the average handle time of transactions the CSP has the
opportunity to reduce staffing and realize headcount savings. Savings are typically made either through
reducing variation by managing CSSs who are outliers or streamlining the process to improve the
process’s capability to perform.
Occupancy: Improvements in occupancy are made by better scheduling staff and reducing the amount of
non-productive ready time. Occupancy gains result when the customer contact operation is either doing
more work with the same number of CSSs or has reduced the number of CSSs required to do the existing
workload.
Utilization: Minimizing the amount of CSS work time where they are not ready to handle transactions
reduces the number of CSSs that are needed. This is managed by the floor management team.
Autonomous Handle Rate: Increasing the percentage of customer interactions where a digital assisted
system can completely handle the transaction, end to end, without any human intervention. Well-
designed digital assisted systems can provide highly efficient and accurate customer service at a lower
cost than human assisted support.
Cost per transaction: When measuring the overall effects of efficiency gains as detailed above, these will
drive reduction in the cost per transaction.
Improvements in Service
Faster Service Speed: Delivering great service in an efficient manner is the product of many factors,
including but not limited to better capacity planning models, well-designed and maintained digital
assisted systems, and competent CSSs.
Reduction in Backlog: By better meeting speed of response targets for deferred transactions, backlogs
are reduced and therefore the number of transactions that are received by eliminating repeat contacts.
Reduction in Client Penalty Payments: OSPs can minimize penalties and maximize bonus payments by
consistently meeting contractual commitments amongst which may be Service Level targets.
As personnel costs account for approximately 70-80% of the total operational costs in a CSP or OSP
environment, changes in employee engagement levels can have a significant impact on the financial
performance of an entity.
Two of the most common ways of measuring the direct cost savings brought about as a result of improving
employee engagement are focused on reducing absenteeism and increasing employee retention (reducing
attrition).
o Salary costs during training: Salary costs paid to CSSs during new hire training includes salary plus
benefits and fringe costs but not fixed costs such as workstations, etc.
o Direct recruitment costs: An agency’s cost or internal costs specifically spent on recruitment –
excluding fixed costs.
o Cost of overtime: Backfilling leavers until new recruits are operational.
o Reduced productivity of new hires: New hires tend to have poorer average handle times than
tenured staff. In a typical customer contact operation with a medium call length program, COPC Inc.
finds that it can take up to 7 weeks from the end of training for a new hire to reach the efficiency of
existing CSSs.
o Direct costs of training: Materials, additional equipment, hires, directly attributable costs – excluding
fixed costs.
o For OSPs paid by Full Time Equivalent (FTE): There is a revenue impact to consider when calculating
the cost of attrition.
o Fixed Costs: It is debatable whether costs of overhead such as recruiting and training departments,
training facilities, etc. should be included in the cost per attrit. COPC Inc. normally does not include
these in the calculation of savings, as often reducing attrition does not have as much impact on
these departments as the cost per leaver calculation implies, as costs will reduce by steps rather
than by attrit. If they are to be included, it is better to forecast annual attrition and spread the fixed
costs over the total number of expected leavers in a year to derive the burdened cost per leaver.
o costs over the total number of expected leavers in a year to derive the burdened cost per leaver.
Absenteeism: The CSS headcount should be increased to allow for absent CSSs for the CSP to properly
staff to arrival patterns. For every % of absenteeism for whatever reason that is included in the capacity
plan the number of CSSs employed will increase by that %. This does not just include sickness; this will
also include vacation, training, holidays, personal time off, maternity leave (paid for), and other types of
absence. The calculation of the impact of absenteeism will include:
The impacts of Attrition or Absenteeism on Service Level, Revenue, First Contact Resolution, or other
resulting costs associated with poor performance are not included in the Costs of Attrition or Absenteeism
for savings purposes, as savings made will be calculated in those specific performance areas and including
them in Attrition or Absenteeism will lead to double counting of savings.
Headcount Reduction: Most commonly in customer contact operations, savings will be measured in
reduced FTEs, or reduced paid hours. To make it real to the organization it is imperative to turn savings
into monetary amounts. For example, the significance of a 5% gain in FCR in a 500-seat program is
hidden unless this is translated into 5% less call volume, or 25 less CSSs required or $500,000 potential
annual savings (assuming a CSS costs $20,000 per annum)
When calculating actual head count savings, these need to be offset against increases or decreases in
volumes (not attributable to the project), other work taken on, or other changes to the operation.
Direct Attributable Savings: These also need to be turned into a monetary value, so that the organization
can truly perceive the impact of the change. A 10% reduction in Critical Errors, for example, could be
turned into a 10% reduction in the goodwill paid to customers when errors are made.
The best measure of this is improvement in net sales revenue, which directly or indirectly would result from
the improved performance. It is best to translate the number of sales units into revenue using an average
sales value or in the case of a subscription to the annual revenue produced.
If the customer operation is selling or collecting this can be measured in the $ value of the improved
performance.
If the customer operation is generating leads, then this needs to be turned into a revenue figure by using
a conversion factor and average sale value.
For retention, the revenue saved is calculated as the expected annual spend of the saved customer.
(Often, a save is only counted as a save if the customer is still a customer after 90 days)
Identification of Other problem areas in the Organization: By analyzing the reasons customers contact the
operation, it is possible to identify where failures are happening in the supply and provision of services and
products elsewhere in the organization. While this can be used to reduce transactional volume and
therefore costs in the customer operation; these improvements can also have much greater benefits to the
organization as a whole.
The COPC CX Standard will change periodically to reflect the evolution of the industry. The
customer operations industry is evolving rapidly and the COPC CX Standard will reflect these
developments and maintain their status as the global definition of “state of the art” practices and
performance. Changes to the COPC CX Standard will be announced by the COPC Standards
Committee as the changes are approved and incorporated.
Change types:
1. The CSP must have a documented statement of overall direction (e.g., vision, mission, or purpose) that
clarifies its commitment to customers and employees.
2. The CSP must ensure management and employee behavior are aligned with the statement of direction.
1. The CSP’s process for developing its Annual Entity and Department Business Plans must:
b. Ensure plans consistently support each other and are understood by the appropriate individuals.
2. Business plans must be documented and include quantified financial and non-financial objectives,
actions, milestones, and who is responsible for implementation.
1. The CSP must have an approach for setting targets for all required metrics listed in Exhibits 1, 2 and 3
that ensures high performance and continuous improvement.
3. Targets must be set at high performance levels unless these are in conflict with the entity’s statement of
direction.
4. Targets must be reviewed annually, and where performance is routinely better than target and
continuous improvement would improve the customer experience or financial results, the targets must
be improved.
1. The CSP must use a documented approach for reviewing performance to business plans and targets.
1. The CSP must ensure a structured approach is used to improve its service journeys by capturing,
evaluating, and taking appropriate action on information obtained from customers. The structured
approach must:
a. Gather feedback from customers about the enterprise's products, services, support and service
policies, processes, and procedures from any part of the service journey or any aspects of
customer handling from any channel available to customers.
2. Satisfaction with the customer experience must be measured for each service journey (identified in
2.2.1), and channel at the program level.
a. For the service journey, the CSP must measure and manage the customer’s overall experience
with the service journey they used to resolve their request.
i. The experience with the service journey must be measured at least monthly and
analyzed at least quarterly.
b. For the channel, the CSP must measure overall satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the
customer experience associated with the transaction.
i. Satisfaction with each of the attributes that drive overall customer experience
performance.
ii. The experience with the channel must be measured and analyzed at least monthly.
3. The information gathered must be aggregated and analyzed and the CSP must quantify and understand
the relative importance of the factors that have a significant impact on satisfaction with the customer
experience and business outcomes.
a. Identify those service journeys that have the highest potential impact on the CSP or customer.
b. Ensure, for service journeys involving more than one channel, the customer experience is
consistent across channels, unless there is a business reason for this differentiation.
c. Relevant customer information and data must be consistent and available through all channels.
d. The results from the same process carried out in each channel must be consistent and
predictable.
1. The structured approach for analyzing and managing service journeys must:
a. Identify failures in the service journey, product design, or other drivers that lead to unintended
customer contacts.
b. At least annually, determine which service journeys can be optimized through automation,
elimination, simplification, improvement.
1. Forecasting - The CSP must understand its historical volume, transaction handle time, and shrinkage and
must develop forecasts for each of these for all types of human assisted channel transactions (e.g., calls,
emails, chat, footfall (retail), social media).
a. The CSP must measure and manage all forecast accuracy metrics required in Exhibit 2.
2. Capacity Planning - The CSP must develop a capacity plan(s) (using the appropriate demand
requirement calculations, by channel, considering the type of transactions) to determine the number of
staff required to handle the predicted number of transactions.
a. The plan must be created sufficiently far in advance to allow for the time needed to recruit and
train new staff.
b. The model must incorporate the target service level or cycle time and forecasts from 2.4.1 for:
i. Transactional volume
ii. Transaction handle time
iii. Shrinkage
c. Capacity plans must be produced using weekly or daily data.
1. The CSP’s IT service management for customer-facing and customer support digital assisted systems
must incorporate the following processes:
a. Strategy and Planning processes, including but not limited to planning and alignment with
business strategy, budgeting, service portfolio, and governance.
b. Design, develop and control processes, including but not limited to requirements gathering,
design, development, project management, test, release, and transitional support.
c. Delivery processes, including but not limited to provision, availability, reporting, performance,
capacity, security, and continuity.
e. Relationship processes, such as business relationship and supplier management (using the
approaches detailed in Item 2.11 Managing Vendors and Key Suppliers).
2. All technology or systems intended for customer use must be designed to enhance customer
interactions.
a. Systems must enable seamless transfer of unanswered questions and unresolved issues to a CSS
for handling (if a human assisted channel exists).
b. The CSP must ensure all autonomous decisions made by any systems are accessible for review.
3. The CSP or its key suppliers must measure all the service management metrics in Exhibit 2.
1. The quality management approach must enable the CSP to measure the accuracy or defect rate
performance of a human or digital assisted program. This approach must ensure that:
a. The number of monthly interactions to be monitored or checked for each program is based on
an understanding of the statistical implications of the sample size.
2. The CSP must have an approach for analyzing quality results to understand and identify frequent errors
and their causes.
3. The CSP’s quality management approach must ensure that individuals performing monitoring or systems
used for quality assurance checks are effective and calibrated to ensure consistency.
1. The CSP must use a structured problem-solving approach to process improvement that:
a. Apply this methodology to any metrics directly affecting the Customer, Efficiency or Cost,
Sales, and Customer Experience and Dissatisfaction metrics that are not meeting performance
3/4ths of the time periods.
b. Use a structured prioritization process to take actions on those improvement initiatives that
have the highest potential impact on the CSP, enterprise or customer.
c. Be able to demonstrate that performance has improved as a result of its process improvement
efforts.
1. For human assisted channels, the CSP must have an approach that ensures the procedures for each
KCRP are performed:
a. As intended.
b. In a consistent manner across all shifts and work teams, i.e., the CSP must minimize variation.
2. For those human assisted KCRPs where there is high variation, the CSP must demonstrate it can improve
process performance, in part, by using the continuous improvement process described in Item 2.8
Managing Corrective Action and Continuous Improvement. As part of this improvement process, the
CSP must:
a. Manage variation between CSSs and systems performing the same process.
3. The CSP must formally audit its human and digital assisted KCRPs after a significant change or at least
annually.
1. The CSP must use a structured approach for content management to ensure content used by customers,
staff, or digital systems assisting customers is current, relevant, and accurate.
2. The CSP must measure and manage the timeliness and accuracy of content management using all
appropriate metrics in Exhibit 2.
1. The CSP must have a documented statement (such as a contract, service level agreement, or letter) of its
requirements for each vendor or key supplier.
2. The CSP must analyze the performance of each of its vendors or key suppliers quarterly. At least once
every six months, the CSP must provide written performance feedback to each vendor or key supplier.
3. Corrective action plans must be developed if a vendor or key supplier’s performance is found to be
deficient.
1. The CSP must conduct a risk assessment of the potential problems that could adversely impact its
provision of customer handling through each channel and develop contingency plans for those problems
most likely to occur.
3. These plans must be demonstrated to be effective, either by simulation or actual occurrence, within the
past twelve months.
2. For major changes to (and for new) products, services, programs, customer requirements or systems,
the approach must:
1. The CSP must have a documented compliance and privacy policy that considers any legal requirements
and defines:
a. How compliance with international, national, state and federal regulatory requirements will be
ensured.
2. The CSP must document its procedures for enforcing compliance and protecting customer privacy.
3. The CSP must verify these procedures are implemented as designed and effectively ensure compliance
and protect customer privacy.
4. During customer interactions, any violation of compliance requirements or the privacy policy by human
or digital assisted channels must be considered a critical error during the monitoring/quality assurance
process.
1. For all required metrics, the CSP must collect data and the data must be relevant, objective, accurate
and representative. There must be enough data to discern trends.
a. Be conducted annually.
b. Assess compliance of both approach and deployment with all requirements of the COPC CX
Standard for Customer Operations.
c. Yield findings that include documented evidence of “compliance” and “non-compliance” with
the COPC CX Standard for Customer Operations and opportunities for improvement in both
processes and performance.
1. The CSP must clearly define all the skills and knowledge required to perform each Key Customer Related
job.
2. The required minimum skills and knowledge to perform the job must be verifiable (see Item 3.4
Verifying Skills and Knowledge).
1. The CSP must establish a list of minimum hiring requirements of the individuals to be hired for each KCR
job.
2. The CSP’s recruiting and hiring approaches must identify and successfully recruit individuals with these
minimum requirements.
3. The CSP must assess the effectiveness of its recruiting process at least annually.
1. For staff in all KCR jobs, training must be provided for the minimum skills and knowledge required for
the KCR jobs, unless staff are hired with these minimum skills and knowledge.
2. The CSP’s approach to training and development must be formally defined for all KCR jobs and must
define the required outcome.
3. There must be formal retraining of existing staff if skill and knowledge requirements change.
4. At least annually, the CSP must review the effectiveness of training for KCR jobs where post-training
performance does not meet expectations and take actions as appropriate.
1. For all staff in all KCR jobs, required skills and knowledge for KCR jobs must be verified prior to allowing
staff to perform the jobs.
2. The verification process for all staff in KCR jobs must ensure:
b. Staff that pass the minimum performance thresholds are able to perform satisfactorily on the
job.
c. Action plans are established for staff that fail to demonstrate the required skills and knowledge.
3. Following changes in program, procedures, systems, etc., skills and knowledge must be re-verified.
1. The CSP must monitor transactions for all CSSs on an ongoing basis for all transaction types they handle.
2. The CSP must effectively coach and take action to improve based on monitoring results.
1. At least quarterly, the CSPs staff performance management approach must include:
b. Identification and development of effective improvement plans for areas in which KCR staff do
not consistently achieve targeted levels.
2. The CSP must conduct a formal/comprehensive performance appraisal of each individual's performance
to objectives and identify areas for improvement, at least annually.
1. The CSP must proactively solicit feedback from staff at least quarterly on topics impacting customer
experience and employee performance.
2. The CSP must proactively involve appropriate staff in identifying process improvement opportunities
and developing recommendations.
a. The CSP must evaluate, analyze, and take effective action on feedback identified above that has
a significant impact on customer experience and employee performance.
1. The CSP must measure and manage staff attrition and absenteeism.
a. Appropriate action must be taken if attrition or absenteeism results do not meet targets.
b. The CSP must establish targets for Attrition and Absenteeism based on an understanding of the
costs of attrition and absenteeism and the impact of each on service, quality, and the customer
experience; other business requirements; and labor conditions.
1. The customer experience with the service journeys identified in 2.2.1 and each contact channel must be
measured and compliant with the guidelines set out in Exhibit 3.
2. The CSP must use any customer experience metrics required by the enterprise that are not in Exhibit 3.
3. The CSP must measure and manage all required customer experience metrics in Exhibit 3 for
interactions carried out by the CSP or a vendor.
1. The CSP must measure the overall cost of service delivery, including both human and digital assisted
channels.
2. The CSP must use all overall cost management metrics in Exhibit 3 and any additional cost metrics
deemed important by the enterprise.
1. For each Exhibit 1 KCRP that the CSP or a vendor performs, the CSP must use all the required metrics
listed in Exhibit 1.
2. Exhibit 1 required metrics used by the CSP or a vendor must be compliant with the guidelines set out in
Exhibit 1.
3. The CSP must use any KCRP metrics deemed important by the Enterprise that are not in Exhibit 1.
1. For each KCRP for digital assisted channels that the CSP or a vendor performs, the CSP must use all the
required metrics listed in Exhibit 1.
2. Exhibit 1 required metrics used by the CSP or a vendor must be compliant with the guidelines set out in
Exhibit 1.
3. The CSP must use any KCRP metrics deemed important by the Enterprise that are not in Exhibit 1.
1. For each Exhibit 2 KSP that the CSP or a key supplier performs, the CSP must use the metrics listed in
Exhibit 2.
2. Exhibit 2 KSP metrics used by the CSP or a key supplier must be compliant with the guidelines set out in
Exhibit 2.
3. The CSP must use any KSP metrics deemed important by the Enterprise that are not in Exhibit 2.
a. Meet or exceed targeted performance levels for a minimum of 50% of performance metrics, and
b. Meet or exceed targeted performance levels or exhibit sustained improvement in a total of 75%
of performance metrics.
2. Entities involving multiple locations or services (within or across locations) must meet the requirements
of 4.6.1 for each:
b. Service (e.g., customer service, tech support, retail, outbound, fulfillment, e-commerce,
healthcare, business process outsourcing).
To calculate whether it is compliant with the 50% and 75% requirements of this Item, the CSP must assess its
performance on the required Customer Satisfaction, Service, Quality, Sales, Efficiency and Cost metrics at
the levels indicated in the following table:
Entity Program
For more details about the certification process, please refer to the COPC Customer Experience
Standard Certification Guide.
Categories 1.0 – 3.0 of the COPC CX Standard describe the various types of processes, practices, and
procedures that CSPs and OSPs must develop and implement to meet the requirements of the COPC CX
Standard. The COPC CX Standard encompasses not only high-performance approaches, but also the extent
of the deployment of these approaches within the organization. Well-designed approaches that are
pervasively deployed will lead to sustained high levels of performance, which is the goal of the COPC CX
Standard.
• Approaches are the processes, practices, and procedures used to meet the requirements of the
COPC CX Standard.
• Deployment refers to how extensively these approaches are used throughout the organization.
Items in Categories 1.0 - 3.0 are evaluated based on the Approach and the extent of Deployment, according
to the following scoring guidelines:
Items in Category 4.0 Performance are evaluated based on Results performance, according to the following
scoring approach and table of required metrics.
For a more detailed explanation of scoring, please refer to the COPC Customer Experience
Standard Certification Guide.
Each exhibit defines the process and required metrics, how each metric must be measured, and any special considerations.
4.3 Sales – Number of transactions where the Services that have a revenue-related Targets for
Must track conversion rate sales/revenue objective is achieved objective (e.g., making sales/revenue will
(e.g., percent of calls with a (e.g., a sale or appointment is made) appointments, completing surveys, be Program
sale) or conversion volume as a percentage of total transactions saving customers, generating leads) dependent.
(e.g., dollars sold) answered. must use this metric.
Sales
Monthly
Or
Types of KCRPs which are 2.7/ Business Critical Error Errors that are critical from a CSP or Percent of transactions monitored 90%
Quality
deferred transactions are: Client perspective but do not that do not have a Business Critical
4.3 Accuracy –
− Emails negatively impact customers. Error.
e.g., accuracy rate of business
− Web Mails
affecting critical errors of Transactions with no BC Errors Monthly
− Letters and Faxes Measured by Unit – where a unit =
transactions monitored
− Call Backs Transactions Monitored a transaction
− Voice Mail message
processing
− Internal Escalations
(except live transfers) 2.7/ Compliance Critical Error Errors associated with National, State Percent of transactions monitored 99.5%
4.3 Accuracy – or Federal compliance or compliance that do not have a Compliance However, this will
− Exceptions
to any industry regulatory body. Critical Error. vary with whatever
− Payment Processing e.g., accuracy rate of compliance
are the regulatory Monthly
affecting critical errors of Transactions with no CompC Errors Measured by Unit – where a unit = bodies’
transactions monitored
Transactions Monitored a transaction requirements
4.3 Efficiency – No specific metric is required if it is: A common metric used to manage Targets for
e.g., average processing time - comparing units of input to units of deferred transaction efficiency is efficiency are
per transaction, transactions output and the number of transactions better set with a
Efficiency
processed per CSS hour, cost - relevant to the KCRP that it is processed per given time period goal of continual
per transaction measuring (usually a CSS hour or day) instead improvement and
Monthly
of measuring handle time since it can be based,
may be difficult to track this initially, on budget
without a specialist transaction assumptions or
tracking tool. similar financial
indicators.
2.7/ Defect Rate – Examples but not limited to: Defects identified during system Varies by industry
4.4 e.g., number of defects • # defects detected during system checks must be material and likely and transaction
Quality
Sales
contact received. must use this metric. dependent.
Monthly
Or
Total value or volume of
sales/revenue objective achieved in a
given period
4.4 Cost or Efficiency – Cost per transaction is measured as There is no
e.g., Cost per Transaction; the cost of running the service / the benchmark or best
Deflection Rate - % of total number of transactions eligible practice for cost per
transactions deflected from for service. transaction.
Cost
Production Systems fully functional percentage of the total minutes that It is acceptable to report on each
Providing and maintaining the service is open. system separately. However, these
hardware and software that should be combined to create a Monthly
support the systems that are single metric for the levels
used by CSP/ OSP staff to carry calculation.
out a KCRP
Quality
in order to ensure sufficient e.g., actual required vs.
levels. hiring and training. number of
capacity exists to meet service forecasted staffing levels to Monthly
transactions,
requirements at optimal identify required staffing levels
transaction handle
efficiency. to recruit/hire and train staff
time, and shrinkage
percentage
2.4/ Scheduling Forecast The variance between the forecast Must account for the operational Various targets
4.5 Accuracy – and actual required staffing levels. lag time for scheduling. Must be depending upon the
This is calculated as the % of intervals calculated at the interval level. volatility of the
e.g., actual required vs. Monthly
that are within the +x% and -y% of transaction arrivals.
forecasted staffing levels for
the forecast staffing requirements.
scheduling resources to meet
demand requirements.
Recruiting/Hiring 3.2/ On Time – Percentage of CSS staff requests filled
by the targeted date
Recruiting more than the
requested CSS staff does not result
Typically, 90% or
above
Acquiring the necessary human 4.5 e.g., % of CSS staffing requests
filled by the targeted date in an on-time greater than 100%.
resources to meet the staffing
The maximum is 100%. Other KCR Monthly
needs of the operation
jobs are not included in this metric
Real Time 2.5/ Adherence – No specific metric is required. Examples could be: measuring schedule attainment (Were the right
number of CSSs present in each interval compared to the schedule?); Schedule Adherence (Did
4.5 e.g., Schedule Adherence,
Management Conformance, Schedule each CSS adhere to the schedule as planned?); Schedule Conformance (Were the total available
Ensuring that the schedule or Attainment hours scheduled met?).
Monthly
roster is implemented correctly
Service Management 2.6/ Digital Assisted Systems The percentage of digital assisted It is acceptable to set a target Typically, 90% or
Service
4.5 Tickets On Time – system trouble tickets that are resolution time for each ticket above
Metrics e.g., on time by severity level
resolved within the targeted time. based upon its severity. Monthly
Controlling the performance of
digital assisted systems
2.6/ Forecast Accuracy – Peak The percentage of days that the Various targets
4.5 e.g., % of days with an accurate actual peak demand was within a depending upon the
peak forecast tolerance of the forecast peak in the volatility of the Monthly
day transaction arrival
Quality
rate.
2.6/ Forecast Accuracy – Run The percentage of days that the Various targets
4.5 Rate actual transaction arrival rate was depending upon the
within a tolerance of the forecast volatility of the Monthly
e.g., % of days with an accurate
transaction arrival rate transaction arrival
forecast of the daily transaction
rate.
rate
Customer Experience and Item Required Metrics How the Metric is Measured Special Considerations Benchmark or Best Frequency
Cost Metrics Practice Target
Service Journey 4.1 Service Journey No specific metric is required as
long as the organization is tracking
This would apply to the service
journeys identified in 2.2.1 Defining
There are no
specific benchmarks
At least
Quarterly
Customer Experience –
Customer Experience e.g., Customer Effort Score
the experience of the customer Service Journeys and KCRPs. or best practice
Assessing the customer concerning the way that the targets
experience with the entire Service resolution of a customer issue or
Customer Experience
The CSP must measure the overall Cost per Contact, tracking of changes to overall cost
cost of handling customers across Cost per Unit Sold, from moving transactions from one
all the channels they employ Cost per Customer in the channel to another
customer base
BPO BPO covers a spectrum of activities that involve the outsourcing of Back
Office work to be handled by an Outsource Service Provider (OSP) or a
CSP.
Business Critical Errors Anything from the business perspective that causes the transaction to
be defective, such as:
• Unnecessary cost to the business
• Unnecessary loss of revenue to the business
“Business” could mean “Client” for an OSP or “company” for a CSP or
VMO.
Business Plan A document used by the CSP containing actions to meet the specific
objectives established by (or for) the CSP that identifies the individuals
responsible for meeting the objectives, for taking the actions and the
milestones/target dates that should be met.
Calibration Sessions Meetings during which individuals responsible for the monitoring of
transactions compare scoring results for selected transactions and
discuss the scoring of these transactions to ensure consistency of
scoring. These sessions include quantitative evaluation of the
consistency of the scores via comparison to a gauge or reference at the
attribute level and their correlation with measures of the customer
experiences and scores provided by clients.
Chatbot A digital assisted system that conducts a “chat” with a customer using
either pre-programmed potential responses or responses based on a
self-learning autonomous decision algorithm.
Client Complaint Any negative comment from a client received in person or by phone,
mail, fax etc. about any aspect of the CSP/OSP/VMO’s products,
services, staff, or CSSs.
Compliance Critical Error An inaccuracy that causes an entire transaction to be deemed defective
because it is against prevailing regulations or laws and could cause
personal or company liability.
Compliant Meeting the detailed, individual Item requirements of the COPC CX
Standard.
Concurrency The measure of the rate at which chat transactions are processed
concurrently
• Emails
• Web Mails
• Letters and Fax
• Call Backs
• Voice Mail Message Processing
• Internal Escalations (except live transfers)
• Exceptions
• Payment Processing
• Most Back Office Functions
• Processing Orders
• Assembling Product
• Pick, Pack, Ship
• Processing Returns
• Material Receipt & Put away
• Service Dispatch
• Case Management
• Activating Accounts
• Processing Lit Requests
• Processing Do Not Call List
• Processing Client Files
• Activating Accounts
• Processing Letters
• Receiving & Preparing Transactions
Demand A calculation that identifies the expected CSS resources needed, based
(Demand Requirement) on the forecasted transaction volume and AHT (“Unloaded Demand”)
or based on the forecasted transaction volume, AHT and shrinkage
(“Loaded Demand”).
Department Within an entity, a distinct group or segment of the operation most
often defined by the entity’s organization structure. The department
may be comprised of the operation’s service delivery customer contact
component or a support service (e.g., human resources, information
technology).
• For field service operations, KCR jobs include staff who are
dispatched to the customer site, as well as the staff who direct
manage, and evaluate their performance.
• For stores, branches, etc., KCR jobs include staff who interface
directly with customers (e.g., cashiers, associates, tellers, etc.)
as well as the staff who direct, manage, and evaluate their
performance.
• For the COPC CX Standard versions, KCR jobs include those that
deliver CSS training, update or manage content, perform
transaction monitoring, workforce planning, scheduling and
real time management, those who recruit CSSs, and client
relationship managers.
Supervisor The managerial position within a CSP/OSP to which CSS’s report (also
referred to as first-line management).
Support Staff The personnel responsible for supporting staff in KCR jobs. This usually
includes information systems, information technology, telecom, human
resources, schedulers/forecasters, and management.
Support System Systems which are required to help manage the center. They typically
automate a KSP. Examples include forecasting systems, scheduling
applications, transaction monitoring databases, reporting software,
human resources systems, etc.
Sustained Improvement Three consecutive data points which are above the previous
performance level. The three points do not have to demonstrate
successive improvement (i.e., each point does not have to demonstrate
higher performance than the previous data point, but all three data
points have to be above the previous performance level). Data points
which are better than target will be treated as being above the
previous performance level.
Systems Functionality Operation of the system from a customer perspective and not simply
hardware availability.
Target A quantified level of performance for a requirement (e.g., respond to
95% of emails within 24 hours of receipt).
Temporary Staff Staff occupying positions for which there is a known end date.
Third (3rd) Party A maintenance supplier which is utilized to provide on-site or return to
Maintainer base repair or engineering.
Time on Phone The actual length of time CSSs are talking on the phone with a
customer including hold time (commonly referred to as average talk
time). See Utilization and Occupancy.