Chapter 2
Chapter 2
CHAPTER TWO
HIGHWAY ALIGNMENT AND ROUTE SELECTION
2.1. Introduction
Transportation is the key infrastructure of the country; because a country’s economy depends on
how well served the country by its roads, railways, airports and shipping. The country’s
economic growth is very closely linked directly with the transport sector growth.
Highway Transportation
Airway Transportation
Railway Transportation
Waterway Transportation
Pipeline Transportation
Projects are planned and carried out using a sequence of activities known as the “Project Cycle”.
The cycle is composed of the following steps: identification, feasibility, design commitment and
negotiation, operation, and evaluation. Route corridor selection comprises of portion of the first
three of these activities.
Procedures:
Identification
Study of existing information
Conduct reconnaissance survey
Feasibility study
Determine route alternatives (Preliminary alignment 1, 2, 3, …)
Evaluate route alternatives
Preliminary design stage
Final location survey
Identification (Pre‐feasibility study)
The first stage of the cycle is to find potential projects. This is sometimes known is the “pre-
feasibility” stage. There are many sources from which suggestions may come, including well-
informed technical specialists, local leaders, proposals to extend existing programs or projects,
and from operating agencies responsible for project implementation. The decision to proceed to
the feasibility stage arouses expectations for the project. Dubious projects shall therefore be
rejected at the identification stage. It becomes increasingly difficult to stop a project at the later
stages of the cycle.
2 Jimma University, JiT. 2023
Highway Engineering, I (Geometric Design of Highways and Streets) Lecture Note, 2023
Road Design, Construction and Maintenance require an approach depending on the terrain.
The shortest road alignment is not necessarily the easiest, quickest or most economical option for
construction and maintenance. Frequently, topography, slope stability, flood hazard and erosion
potential are likely to be the most significant controls in the choice of the most suitable
alignment and design of cross-section.
During the site inspection the team should examine all alternatives. This information can be
combined with the results of the desk study to determine the most appropriate alignment
alternative.
Feasibility study
The feasibility study will provide sufficient information to decide whether to proceed to a more
advanced stage of planning. The level of detail of this study will depend on the complexity of the
project and how much is already known about the proposal. The feasibility study shall define the
objectives of the project. It shall consider alternative ways of achieving these and eliminating
poor alternatives. The study provides the opportunity to mould the project to fit its physical and
social environment to maximize the return on the investment.
Once the feasibility study has indicated which project is likely to be the most worthwhile,
detailed planning and analysis can begin. Less promising projects will have been eliminated by
this time, and the selected project may be redefined and modified as more detailed information
becomes available. At this stage, studies of traffic, geotechnics and design will be carried out to
refine the prediction of costs and benefits and to enable an economic analysis to be carried out.
3D of alternative routes
What are the relative lengths of the alternatives? Normally the shortest distance is
preferable.
What are the average and mean gradients of the alternatives? Normally the least
severe grade alternative is preferred. However, the relation of minimum grade may be
the inverse to the shortest length route.
Which alternative more closely follows an existing road or track? This makes survey
and construction easier and may indicate the route of least earthworks.
Which alternative follows the least severe terrain type? An alignment through, for
instance, rolling terrain should be less costly to construct, have lower vehicle
operating costs and maintenance costs, and less severe horizontal curves than a route
through mountainous terrain.
Which route remains for a longer period on the crest of the terrain? Such an
alignment minimizes the need for drainage structures. Which alignment minimizes
the need for land acquisition? Which alignment minimizes the need to demolish
buildings and houses?
What is the total number of bridges required for each alternative? What is the total
aggregate length of these bridges?
Which route results in the least environmental disturbance to the surrounding area?
Which route has the least overall project cost, including both design and
construction?
Use preliminary alignments to perform
Economic evaluation
Environmental evaluation
At this stage, environmental impact studies are conducted for each alternative, when requ
ired.
Select the best alternative as preliminary alignment
Preliminary design and feasibility are often simultaneous, but detailed design, which can be very
costly (up to 15 percent of project costs), usually follows a provisional commitment to the
project. Numerous decisions, which will affect economic performance, are taken throughout
design; and economic appraisal often results in redesign.
Horizontal alignment-
Avoid major terrain problems and use some of the tips provided in Design guides.
Vertical alignment
Follow the terrain
Balance earthwork
Meet existing controls
Other considerations such as depressed or elevated roads