Introduction To Public Administration Lecture 24 FEBRUARY 2024
Introduction To Public Administration Lecture 24 FEBRUARY 2024
Administration
• State institutions and agencies are obliged to cooperate with each other.
• Conflict and competition between departments and agencies is common.
• Competition arises from the demands of agencies for adequate resources and
powers to pursue their goals successfully, or to enlarge their zones of
jurisdiction. They also compete for clients and for political sources of support.
Provision of timely, accessible and accurate information
• According to this view, public administration is sum total of all the activities
undertaken in pursuit of and in fulfilment of public policy.
• These activities include not only managerial and technical but also manual
and clerical.
• Public Administration “consists of all those operations having for their
purpose the fulfilment or enforcement of public policy.
• This definition covers a multitude of particular operations in many fields–the
delivery of a letter, the award of compensation to an injured workman and
the removal of a litter from a park. Similarly, administration is concerned with
the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of the government.
• The ‘what’ is the subject matter, the technical knowledge of a field which
enables the administration to perform his tasks. The ‘how’ is the technique
of management, the principles according to which cooperative programmes
are carried to success.
(b). Managerial View
• According to this view, the work of only those persons who are engaged in the
performance of managerial functions in an organisation constitute
administration.
• It is these persons who shoulder the responsibility of keeping the enterprise
and to run it most efficiently. Their job is to plan, programme and organize all
the activities in an organization so as to achieve the desired ends.
• Administration has to do with getting things done; with accomplishment of
defined objectives’. The term administration is also used in narrower sense to
refer to those patterns of behaviours that are common to many kinds of co-
operating groups or the specific technological methods used to reach these
goals.
• The above two views differ from each other in many ways. The integral view
includes the activities of all persons engaged in administration whereas the
managerial view restricts itself only to the activities of a few persons at the
top. The integral view postulates all types of activities from manual to
managerial, from non- technical to technical whereas managerial view takes
into account only the managerial activities in an organisation.
• These techniques are defined by the letters of the word: POSDCORB which
means Planning, Organisation, Staffing, Direction, Co-ordinating, Reporting
and Budgeting.
• As such public administration examines every aspects of government’s
effort to discharge the laws and give effect to public policy; as a process it
is all the steps taken between the time an enforcement agency assumes
jurisdiction and the last break is placed; and as a vocation, it is organising
and directing the activities of others in a public agency.
Scope of public administration
• The subject matter view is more or less similar to the integral view of the
nature of the public administration. According to this view public
administration studies the sum total of the entire activities of the
government; the executive, legislature and judiciary. Thus the scope of public
administration is very wide.
• However, the POSDCORB view and subject matter view are not mutually
exclusive, but complement each other. They together constitute the proper
scope of the study of public administration. “Public administration is an
instrument with two blades like a pair of scissors. One blade may be
knowledge of the fields covered by POSDCORB; the other blade is knowledge
of the subject matter in which these techniques are applied. Both blades must
be good to make
Public Administration as a discipline consists of
five branches:
• (I). Organisational theory and Behaviour;
• (II). Public Personal Administration;
• (III). Public Financial Administration;
• (IV). Comparative and Development Administrationand
• (V). Public Policy Analysis
• The scope of public administration varies with people’s expectations of what
they should get from government. Throughout the world the demands made
by the people upon governments have continually increased and in time to
come they would further increase.
Importance of public administration
• The ideals of democracy, i.e., progress, prosperity and protection of the common
man can be obtained only through impartial, honest and efficient administration.
• An administrator should be neutral in politics and serve faithfully any political party
which comes in power.
• In the field of government he must possess some aptitude for getting along with
politicians.
• Modern democracy has brought in the concept of a welfare state. It has increased
the scope of state activity leading to ever increasing demands on public
administration for more and more of services. Undue intervention of politicians in
administration may cease to be an effective instrument for the realisation of
nations’ ideals.
Importance of Public Administration as a Subject
• Almost for all his needs the citizen depends upon public administration.
• In view of the important role of public administration in the life of the people,
its study cannot be ignored by the citizen of a state.
• Therefore, its teaching should become a part of the curriculum of education.
• The study of public administration will help the people to become better
administrators.
Causes of its Growing Importance
• Public administration and private administration are two species of the same
genus, namely administration.
• But administration exercises great power, more in public administration.
• Public administration is often compared with private administration with a
view to finding out similarities and dissimilarities between the two.
• Both the ‘classical organisation theory’ and ‘human relation theory’
first originated in private administration.
• The management of affairs by private individuals or body of
individuals is private administration while management of affairs by
central, state or local government is public administration.
• There are some points of similarity between public and private
administration. However, there are some basic differences between
the public and private administration.
The following are the important differences
between the two types of administration.
• (a). Political Direction
• In public administration there is political direction. The administrators
under public administration have to carry out the orders which he gets
from the political executive with no option of his own.
• (b). Profit Motive
• Public administration is conducted with the motive of service while the
motive of private administration is profit making. If private administration
is useful to the public, its service to it is a by-product of profit making.
Private administration will never undertake a work if it does not bring
profit.
• (c). Service and cost
• In public administration there is an intimate relationship between service
rendered and the cost of the service charged from the public. Only such
amount of money is raised by taxation, which is necessary for the
rendering of service. In private administration income of funds exceeds
expenditure because there is usually an attempt to extract as much
money as possible from the public.
• (d). Nature of Functions
• Public administration is more comprehensive. It deals with the
various types of the needs of the people. In a socialist State the
scope of State is still larger. Private administration does not cover so
many aspects of human life. It mostly concerned with the economics
needs of life.
•
• (e). Efficiency
• It is considered by many that in public administration efficiency is
less. Because of extravagance, redtapism, and corruption, may
dominate in public administration, and therefore may not be in a
position to function in an efficient manner. But in private
administration the level of efficiency is superior to public
administration. The incentive of more profits impels the individuals to
devote more time and effort to work.
• (f). Public Responsibility
• Public administration has responsibility to the public. It has to face
the criticism of the public, press, and political parties. The private
administration does not have any great responsibility towards the
public. It is only responsible to the people indirectly and that too for
securing its own ends and not for the welfare of the people.
• (g). Public Relations
• The public and private administration also differs on the principles of
public relations. Public relations havea narrower content in public
administration than in private administration.
• (h). Uniform Treatment
• Public administration is consistent in procedure and uniform in
dealings with the public. In such a system a civil servant cannot show
favour to some people and disfavour to others. But private
administration need not bother much about uniformity in treatment.
• (i). Monopolistic
• In the field of public administration, there is generally a monopoly of
the government and it does not allow private parties to compete with
it. For example, no person can establish passport printing services,
railways etc. But in private administration, several individuals or
organizations compete with each other to supply the same
commodity or meet the same needs. Thus there is no monopoly in
private administration.
•
• (j).Financial meticulousness
• Public administration has to be very careful in financial matters.
Public money is to be spend meticulously and according to the
prescribed procedure. It is the legislature, which exercises financial
control over executive. But there is no difference between finance
and administration in private administration. There is no external
financial control.
• (k). Social Prestige
• Public Administration carries a greater social prestige than private
administration. Service to the community is the basic characterizing
public administration.
• (l).Social Consequence
• The social consequence of public administration will be great because
a defect in it will do more harm to the public. But in private
administration this will be less. Even if any harm is done by it will be
of less significance and thereby may be negligible.
• The Public Administration has certain distinctive features, which
differentiate it from private administration. Public Administration is far
more closely tied up with the constitution and formal laws of a country
than private administration. It is thus closest to political science and
emphasises elements such as equality, fairness and rule of law in decision-
making. Private administration, on the other hand, stands by profit,
effectiveness, cost- benefit analysis. The difference between the two is
more apparent than real. Both respond to the environment differently’
which inevitably produces consequences for the functioning of
organisation and their management. It can be concluded that public and
private administration are the two species of the same genus, but they
have special values and techniques of their own which give to each its
distinctive character.
• Review questions
• Outline the main elements covered by public administration
• Discuss the main elements of the integral view and the managerial view.
• Discuss the main elements of POSDCORB
• Distinguish between public administration and private administration
Public Administration and law
• The rule of law is one of the peculiar features of the constitution. The
conception of the ‘rule of law’ was fully analysed and set forth by A V. Dicey,
in his book “Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution”. Dicey
gave to the rule of law, three distinct interpretations.
• 1). Rule of law means that “no man is punishable or can be lawfully made to
suffer in body or goods except for a distinct breach of law established in the
ordinary legal manner before the ordinary courts of the land”. It implies that
no one can be punished arbitrarily.
• 2).The Rule of law means equality before law. Dicey observes that “not only
with us no man is above the law, but that here every man, whatever be his
rank or condition, is subject to the ordinary law of the realm and amenable
to the jurisdiction of the ordinary tribunals”. It implies that, every citizen,
rich or poor, high or low is subject to uniform law and the same courts of
law. If any public official commits any wrong or exceeds the power vested in
him by law, he can be sued in any ordinary court and will be tried in a will be
tried in any ordinary court and will be tried in an ordinary manner.
• 3). Rule of law means that “the general principles of the constitution are
.... the result of judicial decisions determining the rights of private
persons in particular cases brought before the courts”. It implies that in
the Zimbabwean context, the right of citizen do not flow the constitution
but are based on various judicial decisions.