Botox Fat Transfer
Botox Fat Transfer
Annals of Plastic Surgery • Volume 82, Supplement 1, January 2019 www.annalsplasticsurgery.com S59
RESULTS
Forehead aesthetic contouring was successful in all 62 subjects.
The mean amount of fat grafted was 7.72 mL (range = 1.5–33 mL).
Twenty-three patients received 1 injection of Botox to the corrugators
and frontalis on table immediately after fat grafting.
The upper third facial swelling and minimal ecchymosis after fat
grafting cleared within 10 to 12 days on average. One patient early in
our series with thin forehead skin and who tended to excessively ani-
mate her forehead-brow needed a second session of fat grafting to the
forehead 6 months after the index procedure (done without Botox) be-
cause she developed vertical forehead creases during follow-up. During
the second session, she received Botox to the corrugators and frontalis
and subsequently obtained a good effect at latest follow-up. Another
12 patients required an additional session of fat grafting to further refine
the forehead contour. Clinically, there were no instances of palpable or
visible nodules and asymmetry.
The mean ± SD forehead contour grade for the previously men-
tioned 39 subjects improved from 2.29 ± 0.77 to 3.24 ± 0.67
(P < 0.001). The Pearson r correlation coefficient was 0.937
(P < 0.001) and 0.782 (P < 0.001) respectively, for preoperative and
postoperative contour grading.
FIGURE 1. Illustration showing a frontal facial profile showing
our 4 recommended fat graft entry points (red dots) for fat
grafting the forehead on the right side. These entry points are
numbered 1 to 4 from lateral-most to midforehead and are
used as desired to create the full convex forehead 3-dimensionally
during fat transfer. Five recommended points and 3
recommended points (brown dots) are found on the left side for
injection of Botox A into the left frontalis and corrugators
respectively.
S60 www.annalsplasticsurgery.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
TABLE 1. Forehead Fat Volume Measurement Using 3D Photography in Forehead Fat Graft Patients With and Without Botox Injection
FIGURE 3. A and C, Preoperative frontal and left lateral views of a 33-year-old woman with a grade 3 planar forehead. She desired a
rounded fuller forehead. B and D, Postoperative views at 1 year after fat grafting of 6 mL to the forehead. Note the grade 4 voluminous
convex forehead profile lending to the impression of a slimmer smaller face and the harmonious overall look. We routinely overcorrect
by approximately 20% during forehead fat grafting to account for resorption and achieve a durable long-term result.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.annalsplasticsurgery.com S61
FIGURE 4. A and C, Preoperative frontal and left lateral forehead views of a 33-year-old woman with a hump at the upper forehead and
a depression just between that and her supraorbital ridge (grade 2 forehead contour). She wanted to correct the depression. B and D,
Postoperative views at 1 year after fat grafting of 6 mL to the forehead. Note the postoperative correction of the depression through fat
grafting (grade 3 forehead contour).
FIGURE 5. A and C, Preoperative frontal and right lateral forehead views of a 26-year-old man with an obvious shadowy depression
above his very angular prominent supraorbital ridge (grade 1 forehead contour). This shadowing effect is both unaesthetic and
inauspicious in East Asian physiognomy. He wanted to correct the obvious depression and thereby make the supraorbital ridge less
pronounced. B and D, Postoperative views at 1 year after fat grafting of 8 mL to the forehead. Note the postoperative correction of the
depression through fat grafting, as well as the more aesthetic forehead (grade 5 forehead contour) that no longer had a prominent
aged-looking supraorbital ridge.
S62 www.annalsplasticsurgery.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
FIGURE 6. A and C, Preoperative frontal and left lateral views of a 50-year-old woman with a shadowy recession above her relatively
prominent supraorbital ridge (grade 2 forehead contour). She did not like the forehead shadow when taking frontal photos and
wanted to correct the recession and camouflage the supraorbital ridge. We noted that she animated her frontalis and corrugators
excessively during preoperative consultations indicating a need for forehead Botox injection during forehead fat grafting. B and D,
Postoperative views at 1 year after fat grafting 5 mL to the forehead with concomitant Botox injection to bilateral frontalis and
corrugators (grade 4 forehead contour). Note the postoperative correction of the recession through fat grafting, as well as the more
aesthetic forehead that no longer casted a frontal supraorbital shadow.
For most East Asian patients—especially females, the forehead occidental literature. The suitably augmented forehead increases the
is a critical aesthetic unit by modern East Asian beauty standards, and proportions of the upper third of the face in relation to the remaining
a full smooth rounded forehead represents the highly desired aesthetic two thirds and can create the illusion of a more feminine narrower
ideal well appreciated in person and in photos especially from the lateral smaller face.6 It is increasingly common in East Asia to pair augmenta-
and oblique views. East Asian physiognomy values a smooth round vo- tion rhinoplasty with forehead augmentation because a planar recessed
luminous forehead that is believed to convey intelligence, favorably im- forehead is aesthetically incongruous with a prominent augmented nose
press others, and inspire trust in interpersonal relationships. Likewise, and lipofilling the forehead is a simple way to harmonize this. Similarly,
positive attributes are believed to be associated with a full forehead in Kornstein and Nikfarjam6 reported autologous fat grafting to the
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.annalsplasticsurgery.com S63
FIGURE 7. A, Preoperative right lateral view of a 39-year-old woman with a grade 2 forehead contour (mild depression over frontal
area). She desired a rounded fuller forehead. B, Postoperative view at 1 year after fat grafting of 6 mL to the forehead. Her forehead
contour had improved to a desirable grade 5 (pronounced fullness of the frontal area).
forehead/glabella/radix complex with or without concurrent rhinoplasty as used for forehead augmentation. Along with its lack of immunogenicity
a reliable method to reduce the nasofrontal angle, thereby diminishing and hypersensitivity reaction elicitation, as well as its unique capability
unharmonious nasal prominence. to improve rhytides and skin texture over where it is grafted, fat is the
Many males and elderly individuals develop an overtly promi- closest thing we have to a perfect facial filler.16–18
nent supraorbital ridge that results in a primitive and/or obvious aged Incorporating Coleman's tenets of structural fat grafting, we ad-
skeletal appearance. An angular forehead-glabella supraorbital promi- vocate grafting tiny fat aliquots in multiple superficial and deeper fore-
nence produces a relative superior concavity with shadowing that is un- head planes (subdermal and subcutaneous) to generate voluminous fill
aesthetic and believed to bring misfortune in East Asian cultures. These and firm skin support.19 In applying our approach, the freedom and
patients dislike photo taking because the prominence juts out on lateral flexibility to easily inject fat as required with relative artistic abandon
views, and the shadowing becomes most obvious in frontal photos and without concern for filler particle size and cost were a clear advan-
taken with a flash. All our patients also expressed concern with their tage over alternative fillers. We usually require only 1 to 3 tiny stab in-
forehead-glabella rhytides and poorer texture. cisions to achieve a good result making this minimally invasive in the
Forehead augmentation and volumization have been described truest sense, in contrast to the need for longer scalp incisions for methyl
using bony advancement and a variety of alloplastic and autologous im- methacrylate.5,7 Bearing in mind these qualities, one can then focus on
plants.6 Among autologous materials, fat graft ranks as the most popu- building a voluminous convex forehead without any reservation. In our
lar, and bone graft and dermal graft have been used for the forehead. practice, the MAFT-Gun is an essential instrument to ensure precise and
Methyl methacrylate and silicone are well-known alloplastic forehead consistent placement—with every trigger pull—of intact microdepots
implants, but they require significant scalp incisions for surgical place- of fat graft parcels (choice of volume delivery settings at 1/60, 1/90,
ment, carry higher infection risk, and may have unnaturally visible or 1/120, 1/150, 1/180, and 1/240 mL) that will stand the highest chance
palpable borders.7,8 Silicone forehead implants have been reported to of vascularization in the recipient site after grafting, in accordance with
migrate, cause seromas, and deform the underlying cranium.5,9,10 Coleman's principles for successful fat grafting.3,14,18,19 We and others
Hyaluronic acid filler is popularly used throughout East Asia for mini- have successfully used the MAFT-Gun to fat graft thin sunken upper
mally invasive forehead augmentation, and calcium hydroxyapatite is eyelids without causing deformity from bolus deposition.3 Large bolus
also recommended for this indication; however, the longevity of alterna- fat deposition and uneven fat distribution were therefore all the more
tive fillers is more limited.11–13 unlikely in the forehead with thicker skin. This may well explain the
Again based on current literature search, there are few publica- overall satisfactory symmetry and absence of forehead nodule and fat
tions detailing the specific technique of forehead lipofilling to achieve necrosis formation during follow-up.
consistently good outcomes.14 Ironically, and to our best knowledge, Fat grafting to the glabella region was previously reported to
no objective study on forehead fat grafting outcomes in East Asians be generally ineffective with most patients showing significant graft
has been published despite the immense popularity of this procedure loss by 3 to 4 months.20 Bucky and Kanchwala12 also had unsatis-
in the said region. The previously mentioned aging forehead changes factory glabella fat graft outcomes until they started injecting Botox
in our study are mostly the result of forehead skin, subcutaneous tissues, into patients' corrugators 1 week before fat grafting and found that
and bone atrophying over time, contributing to forehead flattening, de- just 3 months of corrugator blockade could provide long-term gla-
pression, and rhytides.1,6,15 For these, fat grafting of the forehead is an bella fat graft survival. Theoretically immobilizing the corrugators
efficacious like-for-like tool to correct unaesthetic contours through either chemically or by surgical resection would increase fat graft
soft-tissue volumization and to rejuvenate the overlying skin and under- stability and enhance survival and retention, making overcorrection
lying bone through the effects of many adipose growth factors.1,6 less crucial.1 This suggested that forehead Botox might increase
Proponents of forehead fat grafting are in unison regarding the forehead fat retention rate in part due to decreased muscle tension
advantages of fat. Autologous fat—readily available in just about during graft take. Isik and Sahin21 recruit adhesive tape and a hair
everyone—has a permanence, cost-effectiveness, and safety profile su- band for the purpose of forehead fat graft stabilization and achieved
perior to that of alternative fillers and alloplastic implants commonly satisfactory graft take.
S64 www.annalsplasticsurgery.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
In agreement with some authors, we did not find routine use of minimum downtime, and the results are long-lasting with high pa-
forehead Botox necessary for forehead lipofilling in all patients.21,22 tient satisfaction rates.
However, in our results, 1 subject with lax thin atrophied forehead skin
and habitual overanimation of her forehead brow developed vertical ACKNOWLEDGMENT
creases (these were much deeper than her native frown lines) in her fat- Informed consent was received for publication of the figures in
grafted forehead likely due to fat displacement by her overcontracting this article.
corrugators and frontalis. We therefore modified our procedure thereafter REFERENCES
to include Botox injection targeting frontalis and corrugators immedi-
ately after fat grafting for the following clients: those with lax thinner 1. Guyuron B, Lee M. A reappraisal of surgical techniques and efficacy in forehead
rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:426–435.
forehead skin, those in whom we observed to habitually animate their
2. Buckingham ED, Glasgold R, Kontis T, et al. Volume rejuvenation of the facial
forehead brow a lot, and those with significant forehead rhytides. With upper third. Facial Plast Surg. 2015;31:43–54.
this measure in place, the problem of vertical creases did not arise again 3. Lin TM, Lin TY, Chou CK, et al. Application of microautologous fat transplanta-
in subsequent cases. Importantly, our current 3D quantitative analysis re- tion in the correction of sunken upper eyelid. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open.
vealed significantly increased long-term retention of grafted forehead fat 2014;2:e259.
in those who received Botox compared with those who did not. We attri- 4. Lin S, Hsiao YC, Huang JJ, et al. Minimal invasive rhinoplasty: fat injection for
bute this increased fat retention rate to decreased forehead muscle tension nasal dorsum contouring. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:S117–S123.
during the critical period of graft taking. 5. Song YT. Using methyl methacrylate in forehead contouring for aesthetic pur-
poses. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:1622–1627.
When indicated, we preferred to administer Botox at the end of
6. Kornstein AN, Nikfarjam JS. Fat grafting to the forehead/glabella/radix complex
forehead fat grafting so that immediately preoperatively, we could easily and pyriform aperture: aesthetic and anti-aging implications. Plast Reconstr Surg
mark out the location of forehead-glabella rhytides and irregularities for Glob Open. 2015;3:e500.
direct fat grafting. In our patients who did not require forehead Botox 7. Park DK, Song I, Lee JH, et al. Forehead augmentation with a methyl methacry-
injection, we found their fat grafting outcomes to be durable at up to late onlay implant using an injection-molding technique. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;
44-month follow-up. Although most proponents of forehead fat grafting 40:597–602.
generally advocate a 10% to 15% overcorrection to counter edema and 8. Ousterhout DK, Zlotolow IM. Aesthetic improvement of the forehead utilizing
methylmethacrylate onlay implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1990;14:281–285.
expected resorption, we preferred to overcorrect by approximately 20%
9. Park YW. Frontal augmentation as an adjunct to orthognathic or facial contouring
to achieve the ideal lasting outcomes in our patients.2,22 surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;38:37.
Our approach is minimally invasive with minimal downtime. It is 10. Wong JK. Forehead augmentation with alloplastic implants. Facial Plast Surg
simple and comparatively fast to execute, requiring just standard fat har- Clin North Am. 2010;18:71–77.
vesting with syringe and reproducible good technique in fat grafting to 11. Hyun MY, Mun SK, Kim BJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid with and
the forehead as described, and needing just local anesthesia with or with- without radiofrequency for forehead augmentation: a pilot study using three-
out sedation. All patients at latest follow-up were satisfied not only with dimensional imaging analysis. Ann Dermatol. 2016;28:107–109.
their full foreheads but also with the evident effacement and reduction in 12. Bucky LP, Kanchwala SK. The role of autologous fat and alternative fillers in the
aging face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:89S–97S.
forehead-glabella lines and wrinkles as well as the improved skin texture.
13. Bae B, Lee G, Oh S, et al. Safety and long-term efficacy of forehead contouring
We have demonstrated the longevity of the good results at up to with a polycaprolactone-based dermal filler. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:1256–1260.
approximately 2 years after just 1 fat grafting session in 49 patients 14. Chou CK, Lee SS, Lin TY, et al. Micro-autologous fat transplantation (MAFT) for
(79%). Using our technique and judicious Botox administration, we forehead volumizing and contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41:845–855.
were able to achieve robust lasting aesthetic improvement. Our study 15. Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic im-
limitation was that only 17 patients (27%) completed both preoperative plications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:374–383.
and follow-up 3D photographs, with the rest declining because of busy 16. Gamboa GM, Ross WA. Autologous fat transfer in aesthetic facial recontouring.
schedules or other reason. Otherwise, all were highly satisfied with their Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:513–516.
obvious outcomes and impressed by the efficacy, minimal invasiveness, 17. Lindenblatt N, van Hulle A, Verpaele AM, et al. The role of microfat grafting in
facial contouring. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:763–771.
safety, minimal downtime, and long-lasting results of the procedure.
18. Chang CS, Kang GC. Achieving ideal lower face aesthetic contours: combination
of tridimensional fat grafting to the chin with masseter botulinum toxin injection.
Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:1093–1100.
CONCLUSIONS 19. Coleman SR. The technique of periorbital lipoinfiltration. Oper Tech Plast
Fat grafting to the forehead—with selective Botox injection—is Reconstr Surg. 1994;1:120–126.
an effective strategy toward achieving the ideal forehead contour partic- 20. Eremia S, Newman N. Long-term follow-up after autologous fat grafting: analysis
of results from 116 patients followed at least 12 months after receiving the last of a
ularly for those with planar or recessed foreheads and/or unaesthetic su- minimum of two treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:1150–1158.
praorbital prominence. Where indicated, Botox injection prevents 21. Isik S, Sahin I. Contour restoration of the forehead by lipofilling: our experience.
vertical forehead crease formation caused by frontalis and glabella con- Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:761–766.
traction and objectively increases long-term forehead fat graft reten- 22. Chen HH, Williams EF. Lipotransfer in the upper third of the face. Curr Opin
tion. For the majority, only 1 fat grafting session is required with Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;19:289–294.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.annalsplasticsurgery.com S65