0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

Relativity

The document discusses frames of reference and inertial and non-inertial frames. It describes the Michelson-Morley experiment which found that the speed of light is independent of the motion of the observer. This led to the development of the special theory of relativity and the Lorentz transformations which relate measurements between inertial frames in motion.

Uploaded by

Naba Lmsm
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

Relativity

The document discusses frames of reference and inertial and non-inertial frames. It describes the Michelson-Morley experiment which found that the speed of light is independent of the motion of the observer. This led to the development of the special theory of relativity and the Lorentz transformations which relate measurements between inertial frames in motion.

Uploaded by

Naba Lmsm
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39

Special Theory of Relativity

Frame of Reference
A system of coordinate axes which defines the position of a
particle in two-or three-dimensional space is called frame of
reference.

All motion is relative and in each case a frame of reference


is part of the description of the motion

There is no universal frame of reference that can be used


everywhere.

Inertial Frame of Reference Non-inertial Frame of Reference


Inertial Frame of Reference

The systems in which the Newton’s First law of motion holds


good are called inertial frame of reference.

Any frame of reference that moves with a constant velocity


relative to an inertial frame is itself an inertial frame of reference

Non-inertial Frame of Reference


The systems in which the Newton’s First law of motion does
not holds good are called non-inertial frame of reference.

A frame of reference which is in accelerated motion with


respect to an inertial frame is called non-inertial frame of
reference
Galilean Transformation

y K y´ K´
v EVENT

vt x´
x
x x´
O ´

x´ = x – vt

Z Z´ y´ = y
z´ = z
Time is absolute t´ = t
The Need for Ether
The wave nature of light seemed to require a propagation
medium. It was called ether.

Ether had to have such a low density that the planets could
move through it without loss of energy.
It had to have an elasticity to support the high velocity of
light waves.
And somehow, it could not support longitudinal waves.
And (it goes without saying…) light waves in the ether
obeyed the Galilean transformation for moving frames.
Michelson-Morley Experiment
M1

Beam II
P

S M2

Beam I

The mirrors M1 and M2 are so placed that PM1 = PM2 = l


M1 M 1’
B B’

P P’

In time t2’ the mirror M1 shifts to M1’ and travels a distance vt2’
Michelson-Morley Experiment

If light requires a medium, then its velocity depends on


the velocity of the medium. Velocity vectors add.

Parallel Anti-parallel
velocities velocities
   
vlight vether vether vtotal

 
vtotal vlight

vtotal = vlight + vether vtotal = vlight − vether


Postulates of Special Theory of Relativity

All the fundamental laws of physics retain the same form in all
the inertial frame of reference

The velocity of light in free space is constant and is


independent of the relative motion of the source and the
observer
Lorentz Transformation

y F y´ F´
P (x,y,z,t)
v
(x´,y´,z´,t´)

x x´
O ´

Z Z´
Let a pulse of light be generated at t = 0 from the origin and
spreads out in space and at the same time frame F’ starts moving
with constant velocity v along +ve x direction relative to frame F.
The transformation equations of x and x’ can be written as

x' = k ( x − vt ) (i)
where k is a constant of proportionality and is independent of x
and t.
The inverse relation can be written as
x = k ( x'+vt ' ) (ii)
Here t ≠ t' . Putting value of x’ from (i) in (ii)

x = k[k ( x − vt ) + vt ' ]
x
= kx − kvt + vt '
k
x kx kx  1 
t ' = − + kt or t ' = kt − 1 − 2  (iii)
kv v v  k 
According to second postulate of special theory of relativity speed
of light c remains constant, so velocity of light which spreads out
should be same in both frames
x = ct and x' = ct ' (iv)
Putting values of x and x’ from (iv) in (i)
ct ' = k ( x − vt ) = k (ct − vt )
ct ' = kt (c − v) (v)
Similarly using (iv) in (ii), we get

ct = kt ' (c + v) (vi)

Multiplying (v) and (vi)

c 2tt ' = k 2tt ' (c 2 − v 2 )


2
c
k = 2 2
2
(vii)
(c − v )
1
k =± (viii)
1− v2 c2
Using (viii) in (i), we get
( x − vt )
x' =
1− v c2 2

Using (vii) in (iii), we get

kx  c −v 
2 2
t ' = kt − 1 − 2

v  c 
kx  v 2 
t ' = kt −  2 
v c 
 xv 
t' = k t − 2 
 c 
 xv 
t − 2 
 c 
t' =
1− v2 c2
y' =y and z' =z

These equations are known as Lorentz transformation equations


If the frame F is moving with velocity v along the –ve direction of
X-axis relative to frame F’, then the transformation equations

( x ' + vt ' ) y =
x= y' z =z'
1− v2 c2
 x' v 
 t '+ 2 
 c 
and t=
1− v c2 2

These equations are known as inverse Lorentz transformation


equations
If speed of moving frame is much smaller than the velocity of
light then the Lorentz transformation reduces to Galilean
transformation equations
Length Contraction

y F y´ F´
v
x’2
x’1 A B
O x ´
O´ x´
x1
x2
Z Z´
Let Lo be the length of the rod in Frame F’ measured by O’ at any
instant. This length Lo is called the proper length.

Lo = x − x
'
2
'
1
Let L be the length of the rod measured by an observer O in
stationary frame F.
L = x2 − x1
As per Lorentz transformation

x1 − vt
x =
'
1 (i)
1− v c2 2

x2 − vt
x =
'
2 (ii)
1− v2 c2
Subtracting (i) from (ii), we get
x2 − x1
x −x =
'
2
'
1
1− v c
2 2

L
Lo =
1− v2 c2
2
v
L = Lo 1 − 2
c
⇒ L < Lo
Thus the length of the rod is reduced in the ratio 1 − v 2 c 2 : 1
as measured by the observer moving with velocity v with
respect to the rod.
Time Dilation
y F y´ F´
v
P (x´,y´,z´)

O x ´
O´ x´

Z Z´

Imagine a gun is placed at point P in the frame F’


Suppose the gun fires two shots at time intervals t’1 and t’2
measured by observer O’ in the frame F’
The time interval ( t’2 - t’1 ) of two shots measured by the clock
at rest in moving frame F’ is called proper time interval and is
given by
t 2' − t1' = to
In the frame F, the observer O, which is at rest, observes these
shots at different times t1 and t2 The time interval is given by
t 2 − t1 = t
As the motion is relative, we can assume that F is moving with
velocity –v along positive x-axis relative to F’

From inverse Lorentz transformation equations

t + vx' / c
' 2
t1 = 1 (i)
1− v2 c2
t + vx' / c
' 2
t2 = 2 (ii)
1− v2 c2
Using (i) and (ii)
t 2 − t1 = t

t −t' '
to
t = 2 1 or t=
1− v c 2 2
1− v c 2 2

⇒ t > to
Thus the time interval appears to be lengthened by a factor
1 1− v c 2 2 which is observed by the observer O in

frame F. This is called time dilation.


Velocities Addition
y F y´ F´
v
P (x´,y´,z´)

O x ´
O´ x´

Z Z´

Let u and u’ be the velocities of the particle measured in


frames F and F’
The velocity components are given as
dx dy dz

}
ux = uy = uz =
dt dt dt
(i)
' ' '
dx dy dz
u x' = ' u 'y = ' u z' = '
dt dt dt
From inverse Lorentz transformation

}
( x'+vt ' )
x= y =y' z =z'
1− v c2 2

 x' v  (ii)
 t '+ 2 
 c 
t=
1− v2 c2
Differentiating equation (ii), we get

}
dx'+vdt '
dx = dy =dy ' dz =dz '
1− v c2 2
(iii)
vdx'
dt '+ 2
dt = c
1− v2 c2
From (i) and (iii), we have
dx'
dx dx'+vdt ' +v u x' + v
ux = = = dt ' =
dt dt '+ vdx' vdx' v '
1 + 2 ux
1+ 2
c2 c dt ' c
Similarly

u '
1− v c
2 2
u '
1− v c
2 2

uy =
y
and uz = z
v ' v '
1 + 2 ux 1 + 2 ux
c c
Here the expressions for u x , u y and u z represent the relativistic
laws of addition of velocities
If u = c
'
x i.e. if the light is emitted in the moving frame F’
along its direction of motion relative to F, then

u +v '
c+v c (c + v )
ux = x
= = =c
v ' vc c+v
1 + 2 ux 1+ 2
c c
From above expression it is clear that the speed of light is
same in all inertial frames
Variation of mass with velocity
y F y´ F´
v
B1 B2

u -u
O x ´
O´ x´

Z Z´

Mass of the two elastic balls (B1 and B2) in frame F’ is m.


The elastic balls (B1 and B2) collide with each other in such a
way that they coalesce into one body
By applying the law of conservation of linear momentum
Momentum (B1) + Momentum (B2) = Momentum of coalesced body
(mu ) + (− mu ) = 0
Thus the coalesced body must be at rest in Frame F’.
Let u1 and u2 be the velocities of the two elastic balls in frame F
According to Lorentz velocity transformation
u+v
u1 = (i)
1 + uv c 2
−u +v
u2 = (ii)
1 − uv c 2
After collision the coalesced body moves with the velocity of
Frame F’. Thus v is the observed velocity in frame F.
Let m1 and m2 be the masses of the balls B1 and B2 in frame F
By applying the law of conservation of linear momentum
m1u1 + m2u2 = (m1 + m2 )v (iii)

Using equations (i) and (ii) in (iii)


 u+v   −u +v 
m1   + m2 
2 
 = (m1 + m2 )v
2 
 1 + uv c   1 − uv c 
 u+v   −u +v 
m1  − v  = m2  v − 
2 
 1 + uv c  1 − uv c 
2

 u (1 − v 2 c 2 )   u (1 − v 2 c 2 ) 
m1  2 
 = m2  2 

 1 + uv c   1 − uv c 
m1 1 + uv c 2
=
m2 1 − uv c 2
From equation (i)

1−
u 2
= 1−
1 [ (u + v) / c ]
=
2
(1 − u 2
c 2
)(1 − v 2
c 2
)
(v)
c 2
(1 + uv c ) 2 2
(1 + uv c 2 2
)
Similarly from equation (ii)
u22 (1 − u 2 c 2 )(1 − v 2 c 2 )
1− 2 = (vi)
c (1 − uv c 2 ) 2
Dividing equation (vi) by (v)

1− u c2 2
(1 + uv c ) 2 2
2
=
1− u c2
1
2
(1 − uv c )
2 2
1− u c 2 2
(1 + uv c 2 )
2
= (vii)
1 − u1 c
2 2 (1 − uv c 2
)
From equation (iv) and (vii)

m1 1− u c 2 2
= 2

m2 1 − u1 c
2 2

m [ 1− u c ] = m [ 1− u c ]
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
(viii)

From (viii), it is clear that LHS and RHS are independent of


each other. This is true when each equal to a constant.

[ 1
2
] [
m1 1 − u c = m2 1 − u c = mo
2 2
2
2
]
where mo is the rest mass of the body
Thus
m0 m0
m1 = and m2 =
1 − u12 c 2 1 − u 22 c 2
From above equations it can be concluded that if mo be the rest
mass of the body then its mass m when it moves at speed v will
appear as
m0
m=
1− v2 c2
This is the relativistic formula for the variation of mass with
velocity

If we substitute v = c then m becomes (i.e. infinite mass).
Thus no material particle can have a velocity equal or greater
than the velocity of light.
Einstein’s Mass Energy relation
Let a body of rest mass mo is moving with velocity then its
mass can be given by
m0
m= (i)
1− v c
2 2

According to Newton’s second law of motion, the rate of


change of momentum of the particle is equal to the force
applied on it.
d (mv)
F= (ii)
dt
If the particle is displaced by a distance dx by the application
of force F, the work done Fdx is stored as kinetic energy (E K)
in the body.
dW = dE = Fdx
K
(iii)
From equation (ii) and (iii)
d (mv)
dE K = dx
dt
dx
dE K = d (mv)
dt
dE K = v(vdm + mdv)

dE K = v 2 dm + mvdv (iv)

But m0
m=
1− v2 c2

m 2 c 2 − m 2 v 2 = mo2 c 2 (v)
Differentiating equation (v)

2mdmc − 2mdmv − 2vdvm = 0


2 2 2
( mo and c are constants)

dmc = v dm + mvdv
2 2
(vi)

Comparing equation (v) and (vi)

dE K = dmc 2
(vii)

From equation (vii), we find that change in kinetic energy is


directly proportional to the change in mass.
If the body is at rest, its velocity will be zero and hence the
change in kinetic energy will be zero i.e. mass will be m o
If the body moves with velocity v, then its mass becomes m
and its K.E. becomes EK.
Integrating equation (vii)
EK m

∫ dE =c ∫ dm
2
K
0 m0

EK = c 2 [m − m0 ] = mc 2 − m0 c 2

mc 2 = E K + m0 c 2 (viii)
2
From equation (viii), we find that mc is the total energy. It is
the sum of kinetic and rest mass energy

E = mc 2
This relation is called Einstein’s mass energy relation.
Energy Momentum relation
Let a particle of rest mass mo is moving with velocity, v then
the energy associated with it is given by
m0 c 2
E = mc 2 =
1− v2 c2
Momentum of the particle is
p = mv or v= p m
m0 c 2
E=
1− ( p m c )
2 2 2

m0 c 2
E=
1− ( p c m c )
2 2 2 4
m0 c 2
E=
1− ( p c E )2 2 2

2 4
m0 c
E =
2

1 − ( p 2c 2 E 2 )
2 4
E [1 − ( p c E )] = m0 c
2 2 2 2

2 4
E − p c = m0 c
2 2 2

2 4
E = m0 c + p c
2 2 2

2 4
E = m0 c + p 2 c 2
Kinetic Energy is given by

EK = E − m0 c 2
2 4
EK = m0 c + p c − m0 c 2 2 2

 p 2

1/ 2

EK = m0 c 1 + 2 2  − 1
2
(i)
 m0 c  
 
But 1/ 2
 p  2
1 p 2
1 + 2  = 1+ (v < c )
 m c2  2 2
2 m0 c
 0 
Equation (i) now becomes

 1 p 2
 p 2
EK = m0 c 2 1 + 2 2
− 1 =
 2 m0 c  2m0
When (v << c) then we have m = m0
2
p
EK =
2m
Thus in limit of small velocities, the relativistic relation between
kinetic energy and momentum tends to the classical relation

You might also like