Relativity
Relativity
Frame of Reference
A system of coordinate axes which defines the position of a
particle in two-or three-dimensional space is called frame of
reference.
y K y´ K´
v EVENT
vt x´
x
x x´
O ´
O´
x´ = x – vt
Z Z´ y´ = y
z´ = z
Time is absolute t´ = t
The Need for Ether
The wave nature of light seemed to require a propagation
medium. It was called ether.
Ether had to have such a low density that the planets could
move through it without loss of energy.
It had to have an elasticity to support the high velocity of
light waves.
And somehow, it could not support longitudinal waves.
And (it goes without saying…) light waves in the ether
obeyed the Galilean transformation for moving frames.
Michelson-Morley Experiment
M1
Beam II
P
S M2
Beam I
P P’
In time t2’ the mirror M1 shifts to M1’ and travels a distance vt2’
Michelson-Morley Experiment
Parallel Anti-parallel
velocities velocities
vlight vether vether vtotal
vtotal vlight
All the fundamental laws of physics retain the same form in all
the inertial frame of reference
y F y´ F´
P (x,y,z,t)
v
(x´,y´,z´,t´)
x x´
O ´
O´
Z Z´
Let a pulse of light be generated at t = 0 from the origin and
spreads out in space and at the same time frame F’ starts moving
with constant velocity v along +ve x direction relative to frame F.
The transformation equations of x and x’ can be written as
x' = k ( x − vt ) (i)
where k is a constant of proportionality and is independent of x
and t.
The inverse relation can be written as
x = k ( x'+vt ' ) (ii)
Here t ≠ t' . Putting value of x’ from (i) in (ii)
x = k[k ( x − vt ) + vt ' ]
x
= kx − kvt + vt '
k
x kx kx 1
t ' = − + kt or t ' = kt − 1 − 2 (iii)
kv v v k
According to second postulate of special theory of relativity speed
of light c remains constant, so velocity of light which spreads out
should be same in both frames
x = ct and x' = ct ' (iv)
Putting values of x and x’ from (iv) in (i)
ct ' = k ( x − vt ) = k (ct − vt )
ct ' = kt (c − v) (v)
Similarly using (iv) in (ii), we get
ct = kt ' (c + v) (vi)
kx c −v
2 2
t ' = kt − 1 − 2
v c
kx v 2
t ' = kt − 2
v c
xv
t' = k t − 2
c
xv
t − 2
c
t' =
1− v2 c2
y' =y and z' =z
( x ' + vt ' ) y =
x= y' z =z'
1− v2 c2
x' v
t '+ 2
c
and t=
1− v c2 2
y F y´ F´
v
x’2
x’1 A B
O x ´
O´ x´
x1
x2
Z Z´
Let Lo be the length of the rod in Frame F’ measured by O’ at any
instant. This length Lo is called the proper length.
Lo = x − x
'
2
'
1
Let L be the length of the rod measured by an observer O in
stationary frame F.
L = x2 − x1
As per Lorentz transformation
x1 − vt
x =
'
1 (i)
1− v c2 2
x2 − vt
x =
'
2 (ii)
1− v2 c2
Subtracting (i) from (ii), we get
x2 − x1
x −x =
'
2
'
1
1− v c
2 2
L
Lo =
1− v2 c2
2
v
L = Lo 1 − 2
c
⇒ L < Lo
Thus the length of the rod is reduced in the ratio 1 − v 2 c 2 : 1
as measured by the observer moving with velocity v with
respect to the rod.
Time Dilation
y F y´ F´
v
P (x´,y´,z´)
O x ´
O´ x´
Z Z´
t + vx' / c
' 2
t1 = 1 (i)
1− v2 c2
t + vx' / c
' 2
t2 = 2 (ii)
1− v2 c2
Using (i) and (ii)
t 2 − t1 = t
t −t' '
to
t = 2 1 or t=
1− v c 2 2
1− v c 2 2
⇒ t > to
Thus the time interval appears to be lengthened by a factor
1 1− v c 2 2 which is observed by the observer O in
O x ´
O´ x´
Z Z´
}
ux = uy = uz =
dt dt dt
(i)
' ' '
dx dy dz
u x' = ' u 'y = ' u z' = '
dt dt dt
From inverse Lorentz transformation
}
( x'+vt ' )
x= y =y' z =z'
1− v c2 2
x' v (ii)
t '+ 2
c
t=
1− v2 c2
Differentiating equation (ii), we get
}
dx'+vdt '
dx = dy =dy ' dz =dz '
1− v c2 2
(iii)
vdx'
dt '+ 2
dt = c
1− v2 c2
From (i) and (iii), we have
dx'
dx dx'+vdt ' +v u x' + v
ux = = = dt ' =
dt dt '+ vdx' vdx' v '
1 + 2 ux
1+ 2
c2 c dt ' c
Similarly
u '
1− v c
2 2
u '
1− v c
2 2
uy =
y
and uz = z
v ' v '
1 + 2 ux 1 + 2 ux
c c
Here the expressions for u x , u y and u z represent the relativistic
laws of addition of velocities
If u = c
'
x i.e. if the light is emitted in the moving frame F’
along its direction of motion relative to F, then
u +v '
c+v c (c + v )
ux = x
= = =c
v ' vc c+v
1 + 2 ux 1+ 2
c c
From above expression it is clear that the speed of light is
same in all inertial frames
Variation of mass with velocity
y F y´ F´
v
B1 B2
u -u
O x ´
O´ x´
Z Z´
1−
u 2
= 1−
1 [ (u + v) / c ]
=
2
(1 − u 2
c 2
)(1 − v 2
c 2
)
(v)
c 2
(1 + uv c ) 2 2
(1 + uv c 2 2
)
Similarly from equation (ii)
u22 (1 − u 2 c 2 )(1 − v 2 c 2 )
1− 2 = (vi)
c (1 − uv c 2 ) 2
Dividing equation (vi) by (v)
1− u c2 2
(1 + uv c ) 2 2
2
=
1− u c2
1
2
(1 − uv c )
2 2
1− u c 2 2
(1 + uv c 2 )
2
= (vii)
1 − u1 c
2 2 (1 − uv c 2
)
From equation (iv) and (vii)
m1 1− u c 2 2
= 2
m2 1 − u1 c
2 2
m [ 1− u c ] = m [ 1− u c ]
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
(viii)
[ 1
2
] [
m1 1 − u c = m2 1 − u c = mo
2 2
2
2
]
where mo is the rest mass of the body
Thus
m0 m0
m1 = and m2 =
1 − u12 c 2 1 − u 22 c 2
From above equations it can be concluded that if mo be the rest
mass of the body then its mass m when it moves at speed v will
appear as
m0
m=
1− v2 c2
This is the relativistic formula for the variation of mass with
velocity
∞
If we substitute v = c then m becomes (i.e. infinite mass).
Thus no material particle can have a velocity equal or greater
than the velocity of light.
Einstein’s Mass Energy relation
Let a body of rest mass mo is moving with velocity then its
mass can be given by
m0
m= (i)
1− v c
2 2
dE K = v 2 dm + mvdv (iv)
But m0
m=
1− v2 c2
m 2 c 2 − m 2 v 2 = mo2 c 2 (v)
Differentiating equation (v)
dmc = v dm + mvdv
2 2
(vi)
dE K = dmc 2
(vii)
∫ dE =c ∫ dm
2
K
0 m0
EK = c 2 [m − m0 ] = mc 2 − m0 c 2
mc 2 = E K + m0 c 2 (viii)
2
From equation (viii), we find that mc is the total energy. It is
the sum of kinetic and rest mass energy
E = mc 2
This relation is called Einstein’s mass energy relation.
Energy Momentum relation
Let a particle of rest mass mo is moving with velocity, v then
the energy associated with it is given by
m0 c 2
E = mc 2 =
1− v2 c2
Momentum of the particle is
p = mv or v= p m
m0 c 2
E=
1− ( p m c )
2 2 2
m0 c 2
E=
1− ( p c m c )
2 2 2 4
m0 c 2
E=
1− ( p c E )2 2 2
2 4
m0 c
E =
2
1 − ( p 2c 2 E 2 )
2 4
E [1 − ( p c E )] = m0 c
2 2 2 2
2 4
E − p c = m0 c
2 2 2
2 4
E = m0 c + p c
2 2 2
2 4
E = m0 c + p 2 c 2
Kinetic Energy is given by
EK = E − m0 c 2
2 4
EK = m0 c + p c − m0 c 2 2 2
p 2
1/ 2
EK = m0 c 1 + 2 2 − 1
2
(i)
m0 c
But 1/ 2
p 2
1 p 2
1 + 2 = 1+ (v < c )
m c2 2 2
2 m0 c
0
Equation (i) now becomes
1 p 2
p 2
EK = m0 c 2 1 + 2 2
− 1 =
2 m0 c 2m0
When (v << c) then we have m = m0
2
p
EK =
2m
Thus in limit of small velocities, the relativistic relation between
kinetic energy and momentum tends to the classical relation