Text Based Syllabus Design Susan Feez
Text Based Syllabus Design Susan Feez
This article looks at text-based syllabus design as a way of providing teachers with a systematic framework for
developing content, sequence and methodology in ESL teaching.
Introduction the needs of AMEP teachers, this publication was written with
all TESOL teachers in mind using the CSWE curriculum
Over the last few decades in the TESOL field new ideas about environment to exemplify the process of this type of syllabus
what to teach and ways of teaching have proliferated. This design. Text-based syllabus design also applies t o recent
expanding array has made the field interesting and varied but it curriculum initiatives in mainstream language education, for
has also made it very challenging for teachers when they reach example, the N S W English K-6 syllabus and the School
the point of designing a specific syllabus for a particular group Certificate course performance descriptors. It can, however,
of learners within a limited timeframe and with uneven refer to any syllabus which identifies language learning in terms
resources. This is especially true if teachers wish to avoid of whole texts.
providing their learners with a maelstrom of unrelated,
directionless material and experiences in which wonderful
Defining t e r m s
teaching ideas are set adrift and never really achieve their full
Downloaded from search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.661538732574164. on 03/15/2024 08:52 PM AEST; UTC+10:00. © TESOL in Context , 1999.
we prepare our syllabus well in advance, planning it in detail purpose. Halliday (1985, p. 10) has defined text in the following
and recording it onto elaborate pro formas. There are times way:
when we make it up intuitively as we go along, trusting our
instincts and experience as we respond to learner need from What do we mean by text? W e can define text, in the
day t o day. Whatever we call it and however we do it, all simplest way possible, by saying that it is language that
TESOL teachers sooner or later reach the point where they is functional. By functional we simply mean language
have to choose what they are going to teach, what sequence that is doing some job in some context... So any
they are going to teach it in and how they are going to teach it. instance of living language that is playing some part in a
Text-based syllabus design provides teachers w i t h a context of situation, we shall call a text. It may be
framework for making these choices systematically and for either spoken or w r i t t e n , or indeed in any other
integrating syllabus elements in a principled way. The result is medium of expression that we like to think of.
a syllabus environment in which innovative ideas, old
favourites and traditional language learning experiences can be Texts, these stretches of unified, meaningful and purposeful
organised and interwoven systematically to facilitate learner natural language, are the core component of a text-based
progress along clear developmental pathways. syllabus.
approach adapted to T E S O L . " learning choices w h e n they have neither the knowledge n o r
the experience t o make those choices in a way which will help
t h e m meet t h e i r learning goals.
Course objectives, and t h e r e f o r e learner need, determine the
selection of syllabus elements. Figure 2 shows an outline f o r a W h e n w o r k i n g w i t h i n such a methodological f r a m e w o r k , the
unit of w o r k on casual conversation t o illustrate h o w syllabus teacher has the f r e e d o m t o begin w i t h any syllabus element,
e l e m e n t s have been s e l e c t e d t o c u s t o m i s e a g e n e r a l and t o w o r k backwards o r f o r w a r d s until a full cycle has been
c u r r i c u l u m o u t c o m e t o t h e needs o f a specific g r o u p o f designed. For example, if beginning w i t h a topic, the teacher
learners. fills in t h e c o n t e x t r e l a t e d t o t h a t t o p i c , t h e n t h e t e x t s ,
language features, activities and materials. Equally the teacher
Sequencing the elements: the teaching- could start w i t h a t e x t , w o r k back t o a topic and c o n t e x t , then
learning cycle f o r w a r d t o the rest of the elements, and so o n . Teachers can
even begin w i t h materials o r activities, if this is relevant t o the
T h e original teaching-learning cycle w h i c h was developed as c o u r s e o b j e c t i v e s . In a d d i t i o n , t h e cyclical n a t u r e o f t h e
the basis of genre pedagogy (see Callaghan & Rothery, 1988), f r a m e w o r k allows teachers t o modify the syllabus plan in the
p r o v i d e s t e a c h e r s w i t h a f r a m e w o r k f o r o r g a n i s i n g and light of classroom reality. For example, w h e r e m o r e practice is
sequencing syllabus elements in a c o h e r e n t and systematic needed, more time might be spent on modeling,
way, and in a way w h i c h supports learners as they gradually d e c o n s t r u c t i o n and j o i n t c o n s t r u c t i o n practice activities, but
m o v e t o increasingly i n d e p e n d e n t language use. B e l o w is a w h e r e learners are finding the material quite straightforward,
r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h a t t e a c h i n g - l e a r n i n g cycle d e v e l o p e d they could progress directly t o independent w o r k .
s p e c i f i c a l l y f o r T E S O L (see Figure 3). T h i s c y c l e r e l a t e s
particularly t o teaching literacy but Burns, Joyce and Gollin T h e phase w h i c h is particularly i m p o r t a n t in TESOL is t h e
( 1 9 9 6 , p. 88) have also p r o p o s e d an a l t e r n a t i v e m o d e l o f c o n t e x t - b u i l d i n g phase. D u r i n g t h i s phase l e a r n e r s have
shifting responsibility m o r e relevant t o the teaching of spoken o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o e x p e r i e n c e and e x p l o r e t h e c u l t u r a l and
language in the TESOL classroom. situational aspects of the social c o n t e x t of the target t e x t . The
c o n t e x t - b u i l d i n g phase is also an i m p o r t a n t o p p o r t u n i t y t o
T h e cycle is a sequence o f different phases of teaching and b u i l d v o c a b u l a r y . T h i s phase l e n d s i t s e l f t o t a s k - b a s e d ,
learning which starts w i t h the teacher taking responsibility f o r e x p e r i e n t i a l l e a r n i n g , t o f i e l d w o r k and e x c u r s i o n s and t o
t h e classroom i n t e r a c t i o n . A t this stage t h e t e a c h e r is t h e activities which build cross-cultural awareness.
expert, collaborating w i t h learners t o scaffold t h e i r learning so
they are able t o do what they w o u l d be unable t o do alone. As It is d u r i n g t h e m o d e l l i n g and d e c o n s t r u c t i o n phase t h a t
the cycle progresses, and as learners gain m o r e knowledge and TESOL learners build t h e i r knowledge about specific features
e x p e r t i s e , t h e y are able t o take an increasing share of t h e of English at the level of grammar, as well as t h e i r knowledge
r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e i r l e a r n i n g ( V y g o t s k y , 1934, p. 9 7 8 ; of cohesive links such as reference and conjunction and t h e i r
B r u n e r , 1983; G r a y , 1987; H a m m o n d , 1990). R o t h e r y has knowledge of t e x t s t r u c t u r e . D i r e c t teaching, communicative
pointed o u t that the cycle is "always represented as a circle t o language t e a c h i n g activities, d i s c o v e r y learning t e c h n i q u e s ,
indicate t h e r e are different points of e n t r y f o r students practice activities and drills can all be i n c o r p o r a t e d at this
according t o t h e i r development in learning and literacy" (1996, p o i n t so t h a t t h e l e a r n e r s have v a r i e d o p p o r t u n i t i e s to
p. 102). explore, manipulate and practise language at w h o l e t e x t and
clause level.
December, 1987.
l e a r n i n g f o l l o w o n f r o m o n e a n o t h e r , t h e l e a r n e r ideally
progresses in a spiralling developmental progression t o w a r d s G r e e n , J. (1992). Making the links. Melbourne: AMES Victoria.
t h e specific o b j e c t i v e s of t h e c o u r s e and t h e general
Halliday, M. A . K. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspeas of
curriculum outcomes.
language in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong: Deakin
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
University Press.
Conclusion
H a m m o n d , J. ( 1 9 9 0 ) . T e a c h e r expertise and learner
In s u m m a r y , t e x t - b a s e d syllabus design allows teachers t o responsibility in literacy development. In Prospect: A Journal
c o n t i n u e t o use effective teaching m e t h o d s even w h e n t h e of Australian TESOL 5, 3, pp. 39-51. Sydney: NCELTR.
a p p r o a c h e s w h i c h g e n e r a t e d t h e m e t h o d s have been left
behind in t h e evolution o f TESOL t h e o r y and practice. T e x t - M a r t i n , J. R. & M a t t h i e s s e n , C. M. I. M. ( 1 9 9 1 ) . Systemic
based syllabus design is n o t fixed; it continues t o evolve as o u r Typology and Topology. In F. Christie [Ed.] Social processes
k n o w l e d g e a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f language and language in education: Proceedings of the first Australian systemic
learning evolves. It is teachers pushing at t h e boundaries of network conference, Deakin University, January, 1990. D a r w i n :
this m o d e l w h i c h w i l l c o n t r i b u t e t o t h e e x p a n s i o n o f its C e n t r e f o r Studies in Language E d u c a t i o n , N o r t h e r n
potential as a course design t o o l . T e r r i t o r y University.
N S W A M E S . ( 1 9 9 5 ) . C e r t i f i c a t e s in S p o k e n and W r i t t e n
In t e r m s of TESOL planning and programming, a key issue f o r
English I, II, III and IV. Sydney: N e w South W a l e s A d u l t
success is a c l e a r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f w h a t c o n s t i t u t e s an
Migrant English Service.
e f f e c t i v e d e v e l o p m e n t a l s e q u e n c e in language l e a r n i n g .
E x p e r i e n c e d t e a c h e r s are able t o make i n f o r m e d , but Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: developing an educational
nevertheless, intuitive decisions about the m o s t effective way linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (1996). Literacy in
o f sequencing syllabus elements in a particular c o u r s e , but society. L o n d o n : Longman.
m o r e research is needed i n t o t h e nature of developmental
Vygotsky, L. ("1934,1978). Mind in society: T h e development
progression w i t h i n text-based approaches t o TESOL. T h e old
of higher psychological processes.
idea t h a t s e c o n d language l e a r n e r s l e a r n a f i x e d s e t o f
grammatical structures in a fixed o r d e r does n o t make sense
w h e n w e t h i n k about language in terms of w h o l e texts being
used p u r p o s e f u l l y in social c o n t e x t s . F r o m t h e t e x t - b a s e d
perspective, second language d e v e l o p m e n t appears t o be a
m u c h m o r e c o m p l e x p h e n o m e n o n , as r e s e a r c h i n t o f i r s t [ A longer v e r s i o n o f this paper was f i r s t p r e s e n t e d at t h e
language development by Halliday and his colleagues suggests. Matters f o r t h e Millennium A C T A / A T E S O L ( N S W ) National
T h e r e is much w e need t o learn about degrees of difficulty and Conference, Sydney, 17-20 January 1999.]
progression f o r different profiles of second language learners
w h e n it comes t o w h o l e texts and social contexts, but it is
clear that w e can use o u r knowledge of t e x t t o map multiple
Susan Feez is currently seconded from NSW AMES to the National
developmental pathways across t h e different levels o f language.
Centre for English Language Teaching and Research (NCELTR) at
T h e pathways w e choose will be in response t o the needs of
Macquarie University where she works in the Professional
the specific learners w e are teaching as they w o r k t o w a r d s
Development Section.
t h e i r language learning goals.