Merits and Selection For Master Teacher 2
Merits and Selection For Master Teacher 2
1. Only those who are actually teaching shall be considered for Master teacher position. This
includes teachers who besides assuming special assignments have regular teaching loads.
2. Positions for Master Teacher (MT) shall be allotted proportionally on the basis of number of
teachers. The number for the division shall likewise be distributed proportionally among all
districts.
3. An allotment of one (1) MT position per subject area for at least 5-7 teachers should be the basis
in the secondary level (DECS Order No. 70, s. 1998)
4. If there are not enough qualified teachers in the district to fill the number of MT position allotted
to it, the positions may be filled by a qualified teacher from other districts; provided, however,
that such teacher shall serve in the district where the MT position have been allotted.
Basic Qualifications for Master Teacher I
а. Introduced any of the following which has been adopted or used by the school or district – 20 points
1. All claims for criterion “a” shall be supported with proofs/evidences for validation where
applicable or to attest to utilization, usefulness or effectiveness.
2. The project proposal shall be supported by evidence of data, data analysis in indicators and the
terminal report shall contain statistical results.
3. The project should have been acknowledged/noted/endorsed by the school head/education
program Supervisor (specific area) and duly recommended and approved by the Assistant School
Division Superintendent and School Division Superintendent respectively.
4. Each claim shall be supported with an approved project proposal and a terminal report after
project completion.
5. A certification should be given by the School Head/ PSDS on the project utilization, usefulness
or effectiveness and should be corroborated by at least 5 teachers to attest to the veracity of the
claim
6. Any one (1) of the following shall be given 20 points. For group claims, the points shall be
divided equally among the proponents.
1. Curriculum or Instructional Materials
1. Instructional Materials content and development and its effect after
implementation shall require supporting evidences of data, data analysis
and/ or statistical validation.
2. Effective Teaching Technique or Strategies
1. This may be a developed intervention program/ technique/ strategies based
on a result of a research finding.
3. Simplification of work as in reporting system, records keeping, etc. or procedures in
cost reduction.
1. This maybe a result of a Continuous Improvement (CI) project, a research
findings or an offshoot of results of comparative studies.
4. A worthwhile Income-Generating Project (IGP) for pupils given recognition by
higher officials in the division.
1. The IGP shall be for the learners
2. The IGP shall have been sustained or in existence for at least two (2)
consecutive years with a minimum Net Income of P5,000.00
3. The terminal report shall include among others how the income was
generated, how much was generated, where the income were used.
4. Fund-raising activities are not considered as Income-Generating Project.
b. Served as Subject Coordinator or Grade level chairman for at least one (1) year, or as adviser of school
publication and not considered part of the regular teaching load ~ 12 points
1. Curriculum Study Committee may include work on Intervention or Enhancement Program in the
different learning areas, assessment, monitoring and evaluation.
2. Committee to prepare instructional materials may include development of Instructional
Materials, Development of assessment tools, questionnaires and test materials and quality
assurance of instructional materials.
3. Committee to Prepare School Program may include preparation of school/ grade/ year/ Teacher
Program of work schedule; and special educational programs created in support to the different
DepEd (CO/RO/DO) program which aim to improve school performance.
4. Supporting documents shall be:
1. A designation as chairman of the committee
2. A committee Report/Accomplishment Report
3. Copy of project/Committee output/ Program
4. Certification by the school head and corroboration of at least 5 teachers of the school
d. Initiated or headed an educational research duly approved by educational authorities -12 points
1. Community Project or Activity may include feeding program in the community health and
wellness and nutrition program, agro-industrial fair, ecological/ environmental preservation
project, Rural Improvement Project, Community Literacy Program among others.
2. The community project is community-based, not school-based and sponsored by any of the
following: LGU or Barangay, RIC, other government agency or a non-government organization.
3. Project lead/project organizer shall be given 12 points; while a member of the project or program
as certified shall be given 7 points.
4. Supporting documents shall be as follows:
1. A designation as coordinator/project focal person/project proponent/ chairman duly
signed by the head/chair/president of the lead agency or sponsor.
2. Project proposal/write-up and terminal accomplishment report for the project duly
approved by approving authorities, and approved/noted by the ASDS/SDS.
3. A certification of commendation/ recognition awarded to the proponent or member
for the project may be included.
f. Organized/ managed as in-service activity or other similar activities at least in the school level – 12
points
1. The In-Service activity shall mainly be for the improvement of instructions and/ or professional
development of teachers based on development needs.
2. Participants to the INSET are teachers/School Heads/parents/community or a combination of
both/each group.
3. Supporting documents shall include:
1. Training design duly recommended and approved by the ASDS and SDS
respectively.
2. Memorandum for the conduct of the INSET
3. Certificate of recognition/commendation maybe included.
4. Certification of conduct of INSET by the School Head corroborated by 5 teachers
5. Documents shall clearly show that the claimant is the organizer/initiator and/or
program manager of the INSET
g. Credited with Meritorious Achievements -10 points
Such as:
1. Trainer or coach to contestant who received prizes, commendations or any form of recognition or
placed lstZ2nd/3ld etc. in competition
2. Contestant is a bona-fide pupil/student of the school.
3. Contest may be academic, socio-cultural, community activity or athletic competition which is not
part of a regular lesson/activity.
4. Claim is supported by certificate of commendation or recognition where name of claimant as
coach is explicitly stated.
5. Credit points shall be given for each win in any level but not to exceed 10 points.
6. The point for the highest earned place shall be granted if wins are of the same event/activity.
7. Credit points shall be given as follows:
8. Coordinator of BSP and GSP activities or Scouts which gained awards will be
given points as follows:
h. Authorship – 10 points