Industrial Waste Water Treatment And Biological

Treatment Of Industrial Waste With A Specific Case

Report On Paper And Pulp Industry”
 CONTENT
SERIAL NO TOPIC PAGE NO

1 DECLARATION 1

2 ABSTRACT 2

3 INTRODUCTION 3

4 INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER 4
TREATMENT

5 BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF 6
INDUSTRIAL WASTE

6 CASE STUDY 10

7 CONCLUSION 13

8 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY 14

9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 15

10 REFERENCES 15
 DECLARATION
I, PRASENJIT GHOSH, declare that this technical report titled “Industrial Waste Water Treatment And

Biological Treatment Of Industrial Waste With A Specific Case Report On Indian Paper And Pulp

Industry” and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that I have acknowledged all sources of help.

1
 ABSTRACT
This study investigates industrial wastewater treatment methodologies, with a specific focus on the paper
and pulp industry in India. The paper and pulp sector, known for its substantial water usage and discharge
of complex effluents, faces significant challenges in managing wastewater to prevent environmental
degradation. Through an in-depth analysis of various treatment processes, particularly emphasizing the
efficacy of biological treatment methods, supplemented by a detailed case study illustrating their
application within the Indian paper and pulp industry, this study offers critical insights. The case study
showcases the successful implementation of biological treatment, demonstrating its effectiveness in
meeting regulatory standards and enhancing effluent quality. These findings underscore the immediate
benefits of adopting sustainable wastewater treatment practices within the paper and pulp industry and
set a precedent for other industrial sectors facing similar challenges. Moreover, by promoting
environmental stewardship and regulatory compliance, this study contributes to the broader goal of
advancing sustainable industrial practices. Overall, the study's findings have significant implications for
policymakers, industry stakeholders, and environmental advocates, guiding efforts to mitigate industrial
pollution and foster a cleaner, more sustainable industrial landscape within the Indian paper and pulp
industry and beyond.

2
 INTRODUCTION
Industrial wastewater treatment is a critical aspect of environmental management, particularly in
industries such as textiles, which significantly contribute to water pollution. The textile industry, known for
its extensive water usage and discharge of complex effluents, faces unique challenges in managing its
wastewater. The production processes involved in textiles, including dyeing, printing, and finishing, result
in the generation of wastewater containing various pollutants such as dyes, heavy metals, and organic
compounds. Without proper treatment, these pollutants can have adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems,
human health, and the overall environment.

Addressing the issue of industrial wastewater in the textile sector requires effective treatment methods
tailored to the specific characteristics of textile effluents. Traditional treatment approaches, such as
physical and chemical methods, have limitations in treating the diverse range of contaminants found in
textile wastewater. As a result, there is a growing emphasis on adopting sustainable and innovative
wastewater treatment technologies, including biological treatment methods, to mitigate the
environmental impact of textile production.

In this context, understanding the complexities of industrial wastewater and the unique challenges faced
by the textile industry is crucial for developing efficient and environmentally sustainable wastewater
treatment strategies. By exploring the intricacies of industrial wastewater management and the specific
challenges posed by the textile sector, stakeholders can work towards implementing solutions that
promote both environmental stewardship and industrial growth.

3
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Overview
Industrial wastewater treatment involves the removal of contaminants from water produced during
industrial processes before its discharge into the environment. Various treatment methods are employed
based on the nature of pollutants and regulatory requirements.

Traditional Treatment Processes

The main goal of wastewater treatment is to speed up the natural processes by which water is purified so
that it can be safely discharged into the environment. Traditional wastewater treatment relies on several
steps, including:
 Physical Treatment: Physical treatment methods during primary treatment include the removal of
solid particles and contaminants with processes like sedimentation, filtration, and screening.
 Biological Treatment: Biological treatment methods in secondary treatment use specific
microorganisms to break down organic compounds. In aerobic processes, this takes place in the
presence of oxygen, producing carbon dioxide and water. In anaerobic processes, special bacteria
convert organic substances into methane and carbon dioxide outside the presence of oxygen.
 Chemical Treatment: Chemical processes, usually in tertiary treatment, remove dissolved
substances and contaminants with chemical reactions or additives. For example, in coagulation and
flocculation, chemicals are added to induce particle aggregation and settling. Oxidation, pH
adjustment, and reduction reactions are used to neutralize acidity or alkalinity, remove specific
contaminants, or enhance biodegradation. Chemical treatment is effective in targeting specific
pollutants and pathogens to improve overall water quality.

4
Advanced Treatment Processes
With more stringent effluent discharge regulations in place, and wastewater increasingly being recycled for
reuse, there is a growing need for advanced treatment technologies that produce higher-quality effluent.
These technologies include:
 Advanced Oxidation Processes: In advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) strong oxidants such as
ozone, hydrogen peroxide, and ultraviolet (UV) light degrade persistent organic compounds and
other pollutants in wastewater. AOPs generate highly reactive hydroxyl radicals that break down
complex organic molecules into simpler, more biodegradable forms. These processes are effective
in treating wastewater with refractory compounds or pharmaceutical residues.

 Membrane Technologies: Membrane-based technologies, including reverse osmosis (RO),

ultrafiltration (UF), and nanofiltration (NF), are widely used to separate and concentrate dissolved
solids, contaminants, and suspended particles. RO utilizes a semipermeable membrane to remove
salts and impurities, while UF and NF membranes effectively remove particles, bacteria, and
macromolecules. Membrane technologies are particularly useful for treating wastewater for reuse
and for the recovery of valuable resources from wastewater.

5
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE

Overview
A biological wastewater treatment system is a technology that primarily uses bacteria, some protozoa,
and possibly other specialty microbes to clean water. When these microorganisms break down organic
pollutants for food, they stick together, which creates a flocculation effect allowing the organic matter to
settle out of the solution. This produces an easier-to-manage sludge, which is then dewatered and
disposed of as solid waste.

Biological wastewater treatment can be typically broken out into, three main categories:

 Aerobic, when microorganisms require oxygen to break down organic matter to carbon dioxide and
microbial biomass
 Anaerobic, when microorganisms do not require oxygen to break down organic matter, often
forming methane, carbon dioxide, and excess biomass
 Anoxic, when microorganisms use other molecules than oxygen for growth, such as for the removal
of sulphate, nitrate, nitrite, selenate, and selenite

Processes Of Biological Industry Wastewater Treatment

The organic contaminants these microorganisms decompose are often measured in biological oxygen
demand, or BOD, which refers to the amount of dissolved oxygen needed by aerobic organisms to break
down organic matter into smaller molecules. High levels of BOD indicate an elevated concentration of
biodegradable material present in the wastewater and can be caused by the introduction of pollutants
such as industrial discharges.
When pollutant levels are elevated, BOD can deplete the oxygen needed by other aquatic organisms to
live, leading to algal blooms, fish kills, and harmful changes to the aquatic ecosystem where the
wastewater is discharged. Because of this, many facilities are required to treat their wastes, perhaps
biologically, before discharge—but it’s the level of organic and inorganic pollutants in their discharge
requirements that will dictate what specific unit operations a facility’s biological wastewater treatment
system will need and how they are sequenced and operated.

6
How does a biological wastewater treatment system work?
Depending on the chemical makeup of the wastewater in relation to the effluent requirements, a biological
wastewater treatment system might be composed of several different processes and numerous types of
microorganisms. They will also require specific operational procedures that will vary depending on the
environment needed to keep biomass growth rates optimal for the specific microbial populations. For
example, it often is required to monitor and adjust aeration to maintain a consistent dissolved oxygen level
to keep the system’s bacteria multiplying at the appropriate rate to meet discharge requirements.
In addition to dissolved oxygen, biological systems often need to be balanced for flow, load, pH,
temperature, and nutrients. Balancing a combination of system factors is where the biological treatment
process can become very complex. Below are examples of some common types of biological wastewater
treatment systems, including a brief description of how they function within an industrial wastewater
treatment regimen to give you an idea of the types of technologies and systems that might benefit your
industrial facility.

Aerobic wastewater treatment technologies

Activated sludge was first developed in the early 1900s in England and has become the conventional
biological treatment process widely used in municipal applications but can also be used in other industrial
applications. Wastewaters from the primary treatment phase enter an aeration tank where it is aerated in
the presence of suspended (freely floating) aerobic microorganisms. The organic material is broken down
and consumed, forming biological solids which flocculate into larger clumps, or flocs. The suspended flocs
enter a settling tank and are removed from the wastewater by sedimentation. Recycling of settled solids to
the aeration tank controls levels of suspended solids, while excess solids are wasted as sludge. Activated
sludge treatment systems typically have larger space requirements and generate large amounts of sludge,
with associated disposal costs, but capital and maintenance costs are relatively low, compared to other
options.
Fixed-bed bioreactors, or FBBRs, developed as forced-air industrial treatment systems in the 1970s
and 80s, consist of multiple-chambered tanks in which the chambers are packed tight with porous ceramic,
porous foam, and/or plastic media; the wastewater passes through the immobilized bed of media. Of all
biological treatment systems, FBBRs can hold the most contaminant-eating microbes in the smallest
volume, which makes FBBRs space-saving and energy-efficient technologies ideal for treating wastewaters
from medium to medium-high BOD feed levels down to very low effluent levels. The media is engineered
7
to have a high enough surface area to encourage a robust biofilm formation with long solids lifespan,
resulting in low sludge formation and lowest sludge disposal costs. A well-engineered fixed-bed will allow
wastewater to flow through the system without channeling or plugging. Chambers can be aerobic and still
have anoxic zones to achieve aerobic carbonaceous removal and full anoxic denitrification at the same
time. More advanced biological processes can be facilitated with these systems (for example, nitrification,
denitrification, deselenation, sulfide-reduction, and anammox), by having unique bacterial populations
colonize the biofilm media in separate tank chambers, which can be uniquely configured to treat your
facility’s specific wastewater constituents.

Moving bed bioreactors, or MBBRs, invented in the late 1980s in Norway, already has been applied
in over 800 applications in more than 50 countries, with approximately half treating domestic wastewater
and half treating industrial wastewater. MBBRs typically consist of aeration tanks filled with small moving
polyethylene biofilm carriers held within the vessel by media retention sieves. Today the plastic biofilm
carriers come from many vendors in many sizes and shapes, are typically half- to one-inch diameter
cylinders or cubes and are designed to be suspended with their immobilized biofilm throughout the
bioreactor by aeration or mechanical mixing. Because of the suspended moving bio-film carriers, MBBRs
allow high BOD wastewaters to be treated in a smaller area with no plugging. MBBRs are typically followed
by a secondary clarifier, but no sludge is recycled to the process; excess sludge settles, and a slurry
removed by vacuum truck, or settled solids are filter pressed and disposed as a solid waste.
MBBRs are often used to remove the bulk of BOD load upstream of other biological treatment processes or
used in situations where effluent quality is less important; they are not used for polishing BOD to low
effluent levels. They are used for treating wastewaters produced in food and beverage facilities, meat
processing and packing plants, petrochemical facilities, and refineries.

Membrane bioreactors, or MBRs, came into common use in the 1990s once membrane modules
were submerged directly in the aeration tank, and air scour was implemented to keep the membranes
from fouling. MBRs are advanced biological wastewater treatment technologies that combine conventional
suspended-growth activated sludge with membrane filtration, rather than sedimentation, to separate and
recycle the suspended solids. As a result, MBRs operate with much higher mixed-liquor suspended solids
(MLSS) and longer solids residence times (SRTs), producing a significantly smaller footprint with a much
higher quality effluent compared to conventional activated sludge. MBRs primarily target BOD and total
suspended solids (TSS). MBR system design varies depending on the nature of the wastewater and the
treatment goals, but a typical MBR might consist of aerobic (or anaerobic) treatment tanks, an aeration

8
system, mixers, a membrane tank, a clean-in-place system, and either a hollow fiber or flat sheet
ultrafiltration membrane. As a result of its many parts and cleaning processes, MBRs are known for high
capital, high operating, and high maintenance costs.
Biological trickling filters are used to remove organic contaminants from both air and wastewater.
They work by passing air or water through a media designed to collect a biofilm on its surfaces. The biofilm
may be composed of both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria which breakdown organic contaminants in water
or air. Some of the media used for these systems include gravel, sand, foam, and ceramic materials. The
most popular application of this technology is municipal wastewater treatment and air remediation to
remove H2S at municipal sewer plants, but they can be used in many situations where odor control is
important.

Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Technologies

Upflow anaerobic sludge blankets, or UASBs, useanaerobic bacteria to, as mentioned in the intro
of this article,breakdown organics without the use of oxygen, resulting with a combustible methane-
bearing biogas, treated effluent, and anaerobic sludge. With UASB systems, the general idea is that
wastewaters are pumped into the base of the system, where the organics in the wastewater flow through
a blanket of sludge before entering the upper gas-liquid-solids (GLS) separator, where collection hoods
capture the biogas while allowing the suspended solids to settle and return to the lower reaction zone,
while the cleaned effluent overflows out of the top of the system. The biogas (methane and carbon
dioxide) is either flared or used to generate steam or electricity for use in other processes at the facility.
The UASB process creates less sludge than aerobic biosystems and therefore needs to be cleaned out and
emptied less than other biological treatment systems, but they require skilled operators to maintain
optimal hydraulic and anaerobic conditions for UASBs to operate properly. Expanded granular sludge beds,
or EGSBs, are a similar process, but EGSBs use a stronger upward force to encourage more wastewater-to-
sludge contact.
Anaerobic digesters also useanaerobic bacteria to break down organic waste without oxygen and
produce biogas, mostly for sewage treatment, and there are a variety of anaerobic digesters available.
They each perform the same process in slightly different ways. Examples include covered lagoons, fixed
film, suspended and submerged media, and continuous stirred tank reactors.

9
 Case Study: Implementation of Biological Treatment in a Pulp
& Paper Industry

ABSTRACT

A large paper mill in central India produces a range of paper products employing kraft sulphate process
using bamboo or hardwood or both in suitable proportions as raw material. Huge quantity of water is used
in paper manufacturing, resulting in generation of huge quantity of wastewater. The wastewater
generation was in the range of 160 to 195 m3/t paper produced. Total quantity of wastewater generated at
the mill under study was treated at two effluent treatment plants separately. The paper describes
evaluation of existing effluent treatment plants, bench scale treatability and pilot plant studies for
improvement in quality of treated effluent so as to comply effluent discharge standards prescribed by the
regulatory agencies.

INTRODUCTION

Paper industry has been one of the most important segments in Indian economy over a past few decades.
In the year 1994-95 only 380 paper and paperboard Industries with an installed capacity of 3.84 Million
Tones Per Annum (MTPA) were operational in the country, however, due to certain technical problems;
actual production was only 2.57 MTPA .Subsequently, in the recent years, the numbers of industries are
increased to 480 and today, about 515 pulp & paper industries with an installed capacity of 5.108 MTPA
were reported. Based on annual growth rate of 6.5 % over the period of six years (2000- 2006), the paper
demand in 2005-06 is expected to be 5.48 MTPA. In India, paper mills vary in sizes depending on raw
materials, manufacturing process, products and adopted waste management systems. Originally, Indian
paper industries utilized only bamboo as the main raw material for production of cellulose. However, in
recent years due to short supply of bamboo, hard wood viz., eucalyptus, salai, agricultural residues and
waste paper are supplemented. Thus, raw materials contain two naturally occurring most abundant
polymers viz., cellulose and lignin. Water requirement for large pulp & paper mills varies and reported to
be in the range of 250-440 rn" per tonnes of paper produced (m3/tonnes), which reduces to 200-350 m3
/tonnes in small paper mills . The paper mill based on wastepaper needs only 100 -150 m3/tonnes water in
paper manufacturing . Large quantity of wastewater in the range of 168-282 m3/tonnes was generated
from large pulp & paper mills , however, small paper mills discharged more wastewater (187- 338 m3
/tonnes), due to non-recovery of chemicals . The paper mill under investigation is the oldest and largest in
central India with an installed capacity of 0.08MTPA. In addition, about 0.0004 TPA tissue and poster paper
was also manufactured in the unit. Water consumption for all operations in the industry was ranged
10
between 32700- 51400 m3d-l thereby, generating 26300-38500 m3d-l wastewater from various unit
operations and unit processes viz., bamboo washings, chipper house, digester house, pulp washings, pulp
bleaching, paper machine and, chemical recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Water Quality Analysis

The analytical procedure was followed according to Standard Methods (10). The wastewater analysis was
conducted for various physico-chemical parameters, viz., pH suspended solids (SS), total dissolved solids
(TDS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), nitrogen (TKN, NH4-N),
chlorides, sulphates, phosphates and heavy metals.

Wastewater Treatment Plant

The schematics of the wastewater treatment plant (ETP) for Grade II effluent is depicted in Figure 1. The
ETP comprised of following unit operations and unit processes: Bar screens Primary clarifier Aeration cum
oxidation ponds Sludge drying beds (gravel and sand filters). The schematic of ETP for Grade III effluent is
depicted in Figure 2. The ETP comprised of the following unit operations and unit processes: Bar screens
Primary clarifier Anaerobic lagoon Aeration basin Secondary clarifier Polishing Pond Treated effluent
holding pond (emergency storage) Sludge drying beds (gravel and filters) Designed and observed quantity
of wastewater generation along with paper production at the pulp & paper mill during post-monsoon,
winter and summer seasons is presented in Table 3. All the effluents generated from various unit processes
and unit operations in the mill were conveyed to two effluent treatment plants separately, designed for
Grade II and Grade III effluents.

Performance Evaluation

The performance of both the ETPs was evaluated for a period 10 days in post monsoon, winter and
summer seasons to identify seasonal variations. An hourly flow variation in combined wastewater received
at both the ETPs and combined final treated effluents discharged were monitored for a period of 10 days in
three seasons. Hourly samples of wastewater at various stages of treatment from both the ETPs were
collected separately over a period of 24 hours for 10 days in all seasons. The samples were flow compo
sited and analysed for various physicochemical parameters including heavy metals.

11
LABORATORY TREATABILITY STUDIES

Chemical coagulation

Bench scale treatability studies were conducted to treat effluent from secondary clarifier at Grade III ETP,
to suggest improvement in the quality of treated effluent including colour removal. Phipps & Bird (USA) jar
test apparatus was used during chemical coagulation experiments. Studies to optimize chemical coagulant
dose were undertaken. Alum doses in various quantities ranging from 50 to 300 mg 11 with an incremental
dose of 50 mg 1-1 were incorporated in coagulation studies to treat secondary clarifier effluent from Grade
III E T P. The admixture (effluent + alum) was subjected to flash mixing at 100 rpm for 20 seconds followed
by slow mixing at 30 rpm for 25 minutes. The floc formed was allowed to settle for 60 minutes and then
supernatant was carefully decanted and analysed for various physico - chemical parameters. For removal
of colour, the effluent from alum addition (200 mg 1-1) was further subjected to chemical treatment using
calcium hypo chlorite at various doses ranging from 15 to 60 mg 1-1 with an incremental dose of 15 mg 1-1
. The admixture was subjected to mixing using mechanical shaker for 10 minutes duration. The effluent
from chemical treatment was analysed for various physico chemical parameters.

Alum Recovery

Alum used in chemical coagulation treatment forms gelatinous insoluble aluminum hydroxide that settled
as a flock. The sludge after decantation was then dissolved in concentrated sulphuric acid for conversion of
insoluble inorganic aluminum hydroxide into soluble aluminum sulphate. The clear acidic solution after
settling for insoluble sludge (impurities) was further utilized for next batch of chemical coagulation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

An hourly flow variation at inlet of grade II and Grade III ETPs were monitored for a period of 10 days. The
quantity of effluent received at Grade II was observed in the range of 18300 to 25000m3d-l with average
value of 21800m3d-1. And for Grade III ETP was in the range of 8000 to 13520 m-d-I with an average value
of 11450 ni-d-I. Hourly collected and flow composited wastewater samples from Grade II & III ETPs were
analyzed for various physicochemical parameters. The results on performance evaluation reveled that
treated effluent from oxidation ponds at Grade II ETP comply with all the standards including heavy metals,
prescribed by the regulatory agencies for discharge of effluent into inland surface waters. However, the
treated effluent from Grade III ETP does not comply with prescribed standards with respect to SS, COD &
BOD parameters and needs further treatment for improvement in its quality. The concentration of heavy
metals at both the ETPs was well within the standards prescribed by the regulatory agencies. Mixed Liquor
Suspended Solids (MLSS) concentration in the aeration basin was observed to be in the range of 2140 to

12
2480 mg 1-1 as against designed value of 3000mg 1-1. Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLVSS) was in the
range of 1754-2080 mg 1-1. Dissolved oxygen was in the range of 0.3 to 0.8 mg 1-1. Organic loading rate in
aerobic system was worked out to be 0.28 kg m-3 d-l as against the designed value of 0.25 kg m-3 d -1.
Food to microorganism ratio in the aeration basin was found to be 0.14 kg BOD kgMLSS-ld-l as against the
designed value of 0.1 kg BOD kgMLSS-ld-1. Therefore, the aerobic system was slightly overloaded due to
poor functioning of anaerobic lagoon because of accumulation of sludge over the years of operation. SS,
COD, and BOD removal efficiency in aeration basin at Grade III ETP were found to be 31.1-39.8%, 42.3-
58.6% and 61.2- 69.0% respectively. The poor performance of aerobic basin was due to high F/M ratio and
low MLSS concentrations. Low MLSS concentrations were observed as a result of insufficient nutrients &
dissolved oxygen, low sludge recycle and presence of foam at aeration basin. Additional organic load was
exerted on the aerobic system due to poor functioning of anaerobic lagoon.

CONCLUSION
The management in a pulp & paper mill is a continuous process where the treated effluent from ETP
should continuously comply with the effluent discharge standards prescribed by the regulatory agencies.
Grade I effluent was already recycled and reused in the process. Effluent treatment facilities for Grade II
wastewater were adequate & efficient and no modifications were required. The treated effluent from
Grade II ETP should be recycled in various processes at the mill, viz., bamboo washings, chipper house, and
pulp preparation cum bleaching section. Based on laboratory treatability and pilot plant studies, addition
of 200 mg 1-1 alum followed by 30 mg 1-1 calcium hypo chlorite into. the effluent from secondary clarifier
at Grade III ETP, resulted in significant improvement in the quality of treated effluent. Implementation of
suggested modifications at Grade III ETP, viz., alum dosing unit, clarifloculator followed by hypo chlorite
addition with mixing units at Grade III ETP, the quality of treated effluent improved significantly to comply
with the effluent discharge standards prescribed by the regulatory authorities for discharge of effluent into
inland surface waters. The colour of treated effluent was reduced significantly and did not exhibit any
adverse impact on surface water bodies after discharge.

In conclusion, this study illuminates the crucial significance of robust industrial wastewater treatment
methodologies, particularly within the Indian paper and pulp industry, to mitigate environmental
degradation and ensure sustainable industrial practices. Through an exhaustive examination of various
treatment processes, with a specific emphasis on the effectiveness of biological treatment methods,
coupled with a detailed case study illustrating their application within the Indian paper and pulp sector,
several pivotal insights are gleaned. Firstly, the paper and pulp industry, like many industrial sectors,
generates substantial volumes of wastewater laden with diverse pollutants, necessitating comprehensive
13
treatment to avert adverse impacts on surrounding ecosystems and water resources. Secondly, the
adoption of biological treatment methodologies emerges as a sustainable and economically viable
approach to remediate complex industrial effluents. By harnessing the innate capabilities of
microorganisms, biological treatment methods facilitate the efficient degradation of organic contaminants,
thereby significantly reducing environmental harm. The case study spotlighting the implementation of
biological treatment within the Indian paper and pulp industry serves as a compelling demonstration of its
efficacy in meeting regulatory standards while concurrently enhancing effluent quality, underscoring the
practical feasibility and benefits of embracing such sustainable treatment practices. Moreover, the study
underscores the broader significance of promoting environmental stewardship and regulatory compliance
within industrial sectors, laying the groundwork for a cleaner, healthier, and more sustainable industrial
landscape. Moving forward, continued research, investment, and collaboration will be imperative to
further refine wastewater treatment technologies and facilitate their widespread adoption, thereby
advancing the overarching goal of environmental sustainability within the Indian paper and pulp industry
and beyond.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The significance of this study lies in its comprehensive exploration of industrial wastewater treatment
methodologies, particularly within the context of the Indian paper and pulp industry. By delving into the
intricacies of various treatment processes and focusing on the efficacy of biological treatment methods,
the study offers valuable insights for addressing the environmental challenges posed by industrial
effluents. The case study highlighting the implementation of biological treatment within the Indian paper
and pulp sector provides practical evidence of its effectiveness in meeting regulatory standards and
improving effluent quality. This not only underscores the immediate benefits of adopting sustainable
treatment practices but also sets a precedent for other industries grappling with similar wastewater
management issues. Moreover, the study underscores the broader significance of promoting
environmental stewardship and regulatory compliance within industrial sectors, contributing to the
advancement of sustainable industrial practices. By elucidating the practical feasibility and benefits of
biological treatment methods, the study lays the groundwork for fostering a cleaner, healthier, and more
sustainable industrial landscape, not only within the Indian paper and pulp industry but also across diverse
industrial sectors globally. Thus, the study's findings hold significant implications for policymakers, industry
stakeholders, and environmental advocates striving to mitigate industrial pollution and promote
sustainable development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
14
I would like to thank Professor Dr Shrabani Talukder who gave me the opportunity to work on this report. I
got to learn a lot from this report about “INDUSTRIAL WASTE WATER TREATMENT AND BIOLOGICAL
TREATMENT OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE”. I would also like to thank our principal D. Sourav Kumar Das.

At last, I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to my parents because without their help this project
would not have been successful. Finally, I would like to thank my dear friends who have been with me all
the time.

REFERENCES
[1] Chinwetkitvanich S., Tuntoonsvelt M. and Panswad T.(200). Anaerobic decolorization of

[2] Reactive dyebath effluents by two stage UASB system with tapioca as co- substrate. Water Research 34
(8): 2223:2232

[3] Carliell CM, Barclay SJ, Buckley CA. Microbial decolourization of reactive azo dye under anaerobic
conditons. Water SA 1995;21(1):61-9.

[4] Donlon, B.A., Razo-Flores, E., Luijten M., Swarts H., Letting G., and Field, J.A. (1997).

[5] Detoxification and partial mineralization of the azo dye mordant orange 1 in a continuous up-flow
anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 47(1):83-90

[6] Hitesh R (1998). ‘Studies on Reactive dyeing from Environmental point of view’, practice School-1
Report, submitted to BITS, Pilani, ISPCH (1995). ‘Industrial safety and pollution control handbook’, A joint
publication of National safety council and associate (Data) publisher Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, 2nd edition, 2nd
reprint, pp.451-466

[7] Kharker C.B., T.L.Venkatesan, and A.R. Tiwari (1972), ‘proceeding of symposium on low cost
Wastewater treatment, Central Public Health Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, pp.69-77.

[8] https://ippta.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/IPPTA-184-95-100-Wastewater-Management-in.pdf

15