Scribd
Upload
22 views12 pages

Airbus Fcs 141212104103 Conversion Gate02

The Airbus flight control system uses a fly-by-wire system with multiple redundant computers and actuators to provide fault tolerance. It can operate in different modes and reconfigure to maintain control even after failures. While no system failures have occurred, some accidents may have resulted from pilot misunderstanding of how the system operates.

Uploaded by

irontmp6zxsl
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
22 views12 pages

Airbus Fcs 141212104103 Conversion Gate02

The Airbus flight control system uses a fly-by-wire system with multiple redundant computers and actuators to provide fault tolerance. It can operate in different modes and reconfigure to maintain control even after failures. While no system failures have occurred, some accidents may have resulted from pilot misunderstanding of how the system operates.

Uploaded by

irontmp6zxsl
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Airbus flight control system

The organisation of the Airbus


A330/340 flight control system

Airbus FCS Overview 1


“Fly by wire” control

 Conventional aircraft control systems rely on mechanical


and hydraulic links between the aircraft’s controls and the
flight surfaces on the wings and tail. The controls and flight
surfaces are directly connected. Mechanical links are also
used for the engine control.
 In fly-by-wire systems, the cockpit controls generate
electronic signals that are interpreted by a computer
system and are then converted into outputs that drive the
hydraulic system connected to the flight surfaces. Engine
control is also mediated by the FCS computers.

Airbus FCS Overview 2


Advantages of ‘fly-by-wire’

 Pilot workload reduction


 The fly-by-wire system provides a more usable interface and
takes over some computations that previously would have to
be carried out by the pilots.
 Airframe safety
 By mediating the control commands, the system can ensure
that the pilot cannot put the aircraft into a state that stresses
the airframe or stalls the aircraft.
 Weight reduction
 By reducing the mechanical linkages, a significant amount of
weight (and hence fuel) is saved.

Airbus FCS Overview 3


Fault tolerance

 Fly-by-wire systems must be fault tolerant as there is no


‘fail-safe’ state when the aircraft is in operation.
 In the Airbus, this is achieved by replicating sensors,
computers and actuators and providing ‘graceful
degradation’ in the event of a system failure. In a
degraded state, essential facilities remain available
allowing the pilot to fly and land the plane.

Airbus FCS Overview 4


Hardware organisation

 Three primary flight control computers


 Responsible for calculations concerned with aircraft control and
with sending signals to the actuators associated with the control
surfaces and engines.
 Two secondary flight control computers
 Backup systems for the flight control computers.
 Control switches automatically to these systems if the primary
computers are unavailable.
 Only one computer is required for flight control.
 Therefore, quintuple redundancy is supported. All operational
computers operate in parallel so there is no switching delay.
 Two data concentrator computers
 Gather information from the flight control system and pass this to
warning and display systems, flight data recorders and
maintenance systems. Airbus FCS Overview 5
Hardware diversity

 The primary and secondary flight control computers use


different processors.
 The primary and secondary flight control computers are
designed and supplied by different companies.
 The processor chips for the different computers are
supplied by different manufacturers.
 All of this reduces the probability of common errors in
the hardware causing system failure.

Airbus FCS Overview 6


Computer organisation

Command unit

Splitter Comparator
Input Output
Monitor unit

Flight control computer

Airbus FCS Overview 7


Computer organisation

 The command unit and the monitor unit are separate


channels within a single computer.
 Each channel has separate hardware and different
software.
 If the results of the channels disagree (as checked by
the comparator) or are not produced at the same time
then an error is assumed and control switches to
another machine.

Airbus FCS Overview 8


Software diversity

 The software for the different channels in each computer


has been developed by different teams using different
programming languages.
 The software for the primary and secondary flight control
computers has been developed by different teams.
 For the secondary computers, different languages are
again used for the different channels in each machine.

Airbus FCS Overview 9


Dynamic reconfiguration

 The FCS may be reconfigured dynamically to cope with a


loss of system resources.
 Dynamic reconfiguration involves switching to alternative
control software while maintaining system availability.
 Three operational modes are supported
 Normal - control plus reduction of workload;
 Alternate - minimal computer-mediated control;
 Direct - no computer-mediation of pilot commands.
 At least 2 failures must occur before normal operation is
lost.

Airbus FCS Overview 10


Control diversity

 The linkages between the flight control computers and


the flight surfaces are arranged so that each surface is
controlled by multiple independent actuators.
 Each actuator is controlled by different computers so
loss of a single actuator or computer will not mean loss
of control of that surface.
 The hydraulic system is 3-way replicated and these take
different routes through the plane.

Airbus FCS Overview 11


Airbus FCS problems

 There have been a number of Airbus accidents that may be


related to problems with the FCS.
 One accident (Warsaw runway overrun) has been clearly
identified as a problem with the specification and not with
the system itself.
 There is no evidence of any failures of the FCS hardware
or software.
 However, the pilots may misinterpret how the system
operates and hence make errors that it can’t cope with.
Most likely when the system was newly introduced.

Airbus FCS Overview 12

You might also like