Social Med Moralities and Teenagers To Analyse The Effects of Social Media On Teenagers3737
Social Med Moralities and Teenagers To Analyse The Effects of Social Media On Teenagers3737
69
Abstract
      This article analyses the unchecked and excessive use of
      social media and deterioration of moralities in teenagers from
      different studies in the world. In this study meta-analysis and
      systematic review of secondary data is used. Nowadays use
      of social media websites among the teenagers has become a
      common activity. Social media websites offer a portal for
      communication and entertainment for youth that have grown
      up their personalities. The usage of social media has been
      described as one of the preferred activities for teenagers.
      Systematic searching retrieved a number of publications
      exploring the effects of excessive and unchecked use of social
      media and deterioration of moralities in teenagers. Findings
      show that about 71% and 65% of respondents agree with the
      statement that social media has negative effect on teenagers‟
      health and education, respectively. While 29% and 35% dis-
      agree with this statement. The data suggests that there is need
      to develop policies and guidelines regarding use of social
      media by teenagers, and promote the technical and ethical
      trainings about the use of this modern technology.
Keywords
     Unchecked, Moralities, Social Media, Teenagers, Ethics
Introduction
     Social media has significant role for individuals, however, like any
other marketing tool, it is difficult to foresee impact that it lays on the
people. In recent years, numerous studies have been conducted to sort the
percentage group in prospects of soil media cites user. The results of
  Lecturer, Department of Social Work, University of Sargodha, Sargodha,
Pakistan
70                        MUSLIM PERSPECTIVES       Volume III, Issue 4, 2018
these studies have been identified that many young people (age group
between 18-25 years) are the excessive users of networking sites
(especially Facebook and Twitter) than any other age group, and due to
that, these social networking sites have abundant users than other sites
worldwide. Besides, different researchers have contended that the
perceived positive benefit of the use of social media, in which hopeful
feedback produces more and more users, increases its social platform
(Murdough, 2009).
      According to Merriam Webster Encyclopaedia Britannica
Company defines the teenager when someone is young and has not yet
become an adult during life time. Youth is extremely significant for
future of any nation and country‟s development. Nowadays, social media
is important for youth within the field of learning and education to find
out new trends/innovations in education field, to enhance the
communicating and writing skills, cultural promotion, religious and
political information gathering and sharing links, for better living style,
growth and development of a society.
      Use of information technology and communication is more
extensive and rapidly developing in the different parts of the world. In
fact, in 2015 it was estimated that about 7,000 million mobile phone lines
were in excess of mobile phone users, and that the number of web users
had increased to 3,000 million but lines were only extended to 3,174
million. Globally there are more than 7 billion mobile cellular
subscriptions as compared to less than 1 billion in 2000. According to an
estimate, worldwide 3.2 billion people are using the internet and 2 billion
are from developing countries (ITU, 2015).
     Social networking websites such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter,
and WhatsApp are among the useful way that allow individuals to
contact with one another, and can be a useful source to advertise
products in effective style. In past, a number of studies have been
conducted on usefulness and efficiency of social networking, and have
concluded that social media can be a very helpful tool for the firms to
introduce their businesses, and allow the individuals to contact with one
another (Powell, 2009).
Social Media, Moralities and Teenagers....                             71
      The facts confirm that the large economies lead the path in
utilization of social media and developed nations are bit by bit joining
the advanced world. Developments have driven societies towards
creating new innovation for a middle person. The use of social media,
such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Google, has need to
produce new spaces for exchanging ideas and educational encounters. In
the most recent decade, the existence of texting applications, for
example, WhatsApp, Wire, WeChat and others intended for cell phones
have risen exponentially, intensifying innovative use to the point that
resident presently check their cell phones multiple times every day
(Lacoste, 2016).
     A study conducted by Deloitte (2015) showed that about 85% and
58% of users use the social media and check their informal
communication daily. In recent years, only few studies have discussed
the positive or negative impact of using these sites. Therefore, the
present study is conducted to find the negative and positive use of social
media sites. We have selected the teenagers as the major factor and
investigated the use of social media and its effects by using meta-
analysis techniques.
Literature Review
Effectiveness of Social Networking for Youth
     A number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the
effectiveness of social media for youth. Kuppuswamy and Narayan
(2010) and Shankar and Yadav (2010) claimed that social networking
websites gain focus of the students and then divert them towards
immoral activities and promote non-educational behaviour comprising
on useless chatting . Social media cites may have negative effects on the
academic life as well as learning experiences of the students, however,
these effects were more severe for teenage students as compared to other
age students (Khan, 2012). In another study, conducted for Americans,
Lenhart and Page (2015) argued that more than 57% of teens have used
the social websites for only making the new friends. Among them, 57%
belonged to age group of 13-17 years, and have used these sites for the
replacement of friends online. The authors also discussed that most of
72                       MUSLIM PERSPECTIVES       Volume III, Issue 4, 2018
those relationships stay within the digital world; and only 20% of all
teenagers have met with their web friends face to face. In gender context,
boys are more likely than girls to form online friends; as the percentage
was 61% and 52% for boys and girls respectively. A number of elder
teens were also found forming online friends. In additions, the most
common spots for online meeting with friends on social media were sites
such as Facebook or Instagram. Teenager females who have met new
friends online are more likely to satisfy them via social networking (78%
vs. 52% of boys), while teenagers males are considerably more likely to
satisfy new friends while playing games online (57% vs. 13% of girls)
(Lenhart & Page, 2015).
     There are a lot of ideas inside the mind of an adolescent with
regards to making sound decisions. These incorporate intellectual,
mental, social, and societal factors. More than half (54%) said they spend
an excessive amount of time on their cell phones, and 41% said they
overdo it on social media. So, teens spend an average of time 09 (nine)
hours per day online, matched to about 06 (six) hours for those aged 8-12
years (Russell et al., 2017).
     Actually, technological tools such as mobile phones, computers and
laptops can look like „psycho technologies‟, since they speak to the real
world and influence the young generation‟s mind. This feature can
encourage someone who is addicted, particularly in the individuals who
have psychotic characters like depression and anxiety as due to these
reasons teenagers lose their confidence, and create disturbance for their
families and school (Munno et al., 2017).
Intercultural Relationships
     Recently developed web-based social media cites like Facebook,
MySpace, Twitter and YouTube and have enabled individuals from all
over the world to speak with each other and remain connected in the web
based life. A study conducted by Boyd and Ellison (2007) reveals that
newly developed sites will straight forwardly effect, whichever decidedly
or contrarily and the development of intercultural relations in the online
network through the making system of separate social relationship with
other members of society (Boyd and Ellison, 2007).
Social Media, Moralities and Teenagers....                              73
youth who were non-smoking, living in homes and were more opposed
to smoking; they were fewer users of social media (McCool, 2005). It
has been recognized that problems happen in Samoa, where family
assumes a focal job in social development of teenagers, due to
uncontrolled use of social media (Rennard et al., 2006). Teenagers can
promptly discover tales about savagery, burglary, sexual indiscrimination
and insatiability in a variety of news sources comprising subjective
programming, unscripted TV dramas, rap music, and the internet.
Experts have composed broadly on how the media influences teenagers‟
behaviour, both prosaically and unsocial. However, they have considered
the ethical trainings so that youngsters can avoid these types of harmful
practices (Elliot et al., 2006). The job of media as an effect on
temperaments towards tobacco use among the teens has been disregarded
to a great extent (Erick-Peleti et al., 2007).
     Media, in the form of electronic or print, is perceived as a key factor
regarding social and mental growth (Stoolmiller, 2012). Over the
previous decade, extensive studies have attempted to quantify and
comprehend the effect of media depictions in different phases of
personality development especially effect of tobacco use on teenagers,
tobacco related practices, and temperaments which are harmful for their
health and have negative impact on their education (Shmueli and
Blecher-Prigat, 2010). A number of studies are concentrating on the
different kinds of social media being devoured by youngsters and their
approach to digital media, specifically the internet and cell phones, that
have profoundly expanded and is probably going to be point of
convergence for stimulation and the source of different types of
information for youngsters (Freeman, 2012). BBC News research (2013)
deliberated that 67% Facebook users are documented. Students or
teenagers involve themselves in unethical and anti-social activities on
social media portal, share fake material and differing types of posts that
are harmful for national dignity and foreign relationship of the country
(Chhetry, 2017).
    Moral development in teenagers is pursued as predicted
developmental method. Given an ethical situation, children having age
more than 08 years usually judge an activity as wrong when it leads to
76                       MUSLIM PERSPECTIVES       Volume III, Issue 4, 2018
conflicts with the rules put by authority figures. As teens develop, they
believe various points of views during a situation. At the end of the day,
their moral thinking seems to be more adaptable and „other‟ located.
Valkenburg et al. (1999) have directed a couple of studies focused on the
cases of watching brutality on TV influencing youngsters‟ ethical
thinking. In one study, they displayed 6-12 year-olds with speculative
stories during which culprit performed hostility either for reasons of
insurance called „legitimized‟ savagery or for irregular reasons called
„unjustified‟ brutality. The bulk of the teenagers seemed to have
unjustified anger for not being right (Wilson, 2018).
Problem Statement
     Unchecked and excessive and use of social media is cause of moral
dilemmas in teenagers.
Hypothesis Statement
    It was hypothesized that unchecked and excessive use of social
media will have a negative impact on the moralities in teenagers.
Discussion
Effects of Social Media on Teenager’s Health, Education, Family
Norms and Cultural Patters
     Our findings show that about 71% and 65% of respondents agree
with the statement that social media has negative effects on teenagers‟
health and education, respectively. While 29% and 35% disagree with
this statement for health and education, respectively (Figure 1). About
80                       MUSLIM PERSPECTIVES      Volume III, Issue 4, 2018
70% of studies have mentioned that social media has negative impact on
family norms; however, about 30% studies disagreed with current
statement (Figure 1). Overall no difference was found for cultural
pattern.
     Figure 1) Effects of excessive use of social media on teenagers‟
health, education, family norms and cultural patters. The values were
findings from published studies, according to the author(s) point of view
against said parameters.
Social Media, Moralities and Teenagers....                                                         81
                         50
        Percentage (%)
                                              (40%)
                         40           (37%)
30
20
10
                          0
                                        Dis-agree                            Agree
(Figure 3). Over all 60% of respondents said that social media has
negative effects on social norms, however, 40% disagreed with this
statement (Figure 3).
     Figure 3) The influence of extreme use of social media on moral
development, savagery, sexuality and social norms of teenager. The
values were finding from published studies, according to the author(s)
point of view against said parameters.
Social Media, Moralities and Teenagers....                               83
References
Barry, C. T., Sidoti, C. L., Briggs, S. M., Reiter, S. R., & Lindsey, R. A. (2017).
     Adolescent social media use and mental health from adolescent and parent
     perspectives. Journal of adolescence, 61, 1-11.
Belay, G. (1996). The (re) construction and negotiation of cultural identities in the age of
     globalization. Interaction & identity, 5, 319-346.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The „digital natives‟ debate: A critical
     review of the evidence. British journal of educational technology, 39(5), 775-786.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and
     scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Byrne, E., Vessey, J. A., & Pfeifer, L. (2018). Cyberbullying and social media:
     Information and interventions for school nurses working with victims, students, and
     families. The Journal of School Nursing, 34(1), 38-50.
Chen, G. M. (2015). Theorizing global community as cultural home in the new
     century. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 46, 73-81.
Chen, W., Wang, C., & Wang, Y. (2010, July). Scalable influence maximization for
     prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. In Proceedings of the 16th
     ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data
     mining (pp. 1029-1038).
Chhetry, L., & Rashid, A. T. (2017). Social Media Behaviour of Teenagers and Privacy
     Issues.
Croucher, S. M. (2011). Social networking and cultural adaptation: A theoretical
     model. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4(4), 259-264.
De Luca, M. (2017). Hikikomori: Cultural idiom or present-day expression of the distress
     engendered by the transition from adolescence to adulthood. L'Évolution
     Psychiatrique, 82(1), e1-e15.
Deloitte (2015). Facebook's global economic impact, Deloitte LLP report (January 2015)
     prepared                     for                    Facebook                       Inc.
     http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/technology-
     mediatelecommunications/deloitte-uk-global-economicimpact-of-facebook.pdf
Dictionary, M. W. (2011). Compassion. Encyclopedia Britannica.
Eleuteri, S., Saladino, V., & Verrastro, V. (2017). Identity, relationships, sexuality, and
     risky behaviors of adolescents in the context of social media. Sexual and
     Relationship Therapy, 32(3-4), 354-365.
Elliott, D. S., Menard, S., Rankin, B., Elliott, A., Wilson, W. J., & Huizinga, D.
     (2006). Good kids from bad neighborhoods: Successful development in social
     context. Cambridge University Press.
Elola, J. (2010). Los medios deben aparcar su arrogancia. [En línea]. Recuperado de:
     http://elpais.com/diario/2010/09/05/domingo/1283658757_850215.html
Eleuteri, S., Saladino, V., & Verrastro, V. (2017). Identity, relationships, sexuality, and
     risky behaviors of adolescents in the context of social media. Sexual and
     Relationship Therapy, 32(3-4), 354-365.
86                            MUSLIM PERSPECTIVES            Volume III, Issue 4, 2018
Erick-Peleti, S., Paterson, J., & Williams, M. (2007). Pacific Islands Families Study:
     maternal factors associated with cigarette smoking amongst a cohort of Pacific
     mothers with infants. The New Zealand Medical Journal (Online), 120(1256).
Freeman, B. (2012). New media and tobacco control. Tobacco control, 21(2), 139-144.
Galvez-Rodriguez, M., Caba-Pérez, C., & López-Godoy, M. (2016). Drivers of Twitter as
     a strategic communication tool for non-profit organizations. Internet Research
Griffiths, M. (2000). Does Internet and computer" addiction" exist? Some case study
     evidence. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 3(2), 211-218.
Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J., & Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Social networking addiction: An
     overview of preliminary findings. In Behavioral addictions (pp. 119-141). Academic
     Press
Groenestein, E., Baas, N., van Deursen, A. J., & de Jong, M. D. (2018). Strategies and
     cues adolescents use to assess the age of an online stranger. Information,
     Communication & Society, 21(8), 1168-1185.
.Hoeben, E. M., & Weerman, F. M. (2016). Why is involvement in unstructured
     socializing related to adolescent delinquency?. Criminology, 54(2), 242-281.
ITU - International Telecommunication Union. (2015). Key 2005-2015 ICT data for the
     world. Retrieved from ITU Statistics 2015: http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/
     Statistics/Documents/statistics/2015/ITU_Key_2005-2015_ICT_data.xls.
Kedzior, R., Allen, D. E., & Schroeder, J. (2016). The selfie phenomenon–consumer
     identities in the social media marketplace. European Journal of Marketing.
Khan, S. (2012). Impact of social networking websites on students. Abasyn Journal of
     Social Sciences, 5(2), 56-77.
Kim, Y., Sohn, D., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using
     social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college
     students. Computers in human behavior, 27(1), 365-372.
Kuppuswamy, S., & Narayan, P. (2010). The Impact of Social Networking Websites on
     the Education of Youth. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social
     Networking (IJVCSN), 2(1), 67-79.
Lacoste, S. (2016). Perspectives on social media ant its use by key account
     managers. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 33-43.
Lareki, A., de Morentin, J. I. M., Altuna, J., & Amenabar, N. (2017). Teenagers'
     perception of risk behaviors regarding digital technologies. Computers in Human
     Behavior, 68, 395-402.
Lenhart, A., & Page, D. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Pew
     Research Center. Récupéré [le 15 mai 2016] de: http://www. pewinternet.
     org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015.
Lister, D., Giddings, G., & Grant, S. Kelly. (2009). New Media: A Critical Introduction.
     London: Routledge.
Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK children go online: Final report of key project
     findings.
Lusk, B. (2010). Digital natives and social media behavior: an overview. The prevention
     researcher, 17(S1), 3-7.
Social Media, Moralities and Teenagers....                                             87
McCool, J. P., Cameron, L., & Petrie, K. (2004). Stereotyping the smoker: adolescents‟
     appraisals of smokers in film. Tobacco control, 13(3), 308-314.
McCool, J., Mills, J., & Heikes, B. (2005). U.S. Patent Application No. 10/847,463.
Munno, D., Cappellin, F., Saroldi, M., Bechon, E., Guglielmucci, F., Passera, R., &
     Zullo, G. (2017). Internet Addiction Disorder: Personality characteristics and risk of
     pathological overuse in adolescents. Psychiatry research, 248, 1-5.
Murdough, C. (2009). Social media measurement: It‟s not impossible. Journal of
     interactive advertising, 10(1), 94-99.
Park, H., Rodgers, S., & Stemmle, J. (2011). Health organizations‟ use of Facebook for
     health advertising and promotion. Journal of interactive advertising, 12(1), 62-77.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2008). Adolescents' exposure to sexually explicit Internet
     material, sexual uncertainty, and attitudes toward uncommitted sexual exploration:
     Is there a link?. Communication Research, 35(5), 579-601.
Powell, J. (2009). 33 Million people in the room: How to create, influence, and run a
     successful business with social networking. Que Publishing.
Rennard, S. I., Glover, E. D., Leischow, S., Daughton, D. M., Glover, P. N., Muramoto,
     M., ... & Westin, Å. (2006). Efficacy of the nicotine inhaler in smoking reduction: a
     double-blind, randomized trial. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 8(4), 555-564.
Russell, B. S., Heller, A. T., & Hutchison, M. (2017). Differences in adolescent emotion
     regulation and impulsivity: A group comparison study of school-based recovery
     students. Substance use & misuse, 52(8), 1085-1097.
Shankar, V., & Yadav, M. S. (2010). Emerging perspectives on marketing in a
     multichannel and multimedia retailing environment.
Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to
     narcissism and contextual age. Computers in human Behavior, 58, 89-97.
Shmueli, B., & Blecher-Prigat, A. (2010). Privacy for children. Colum. Hum. Rts. L.
     Rev., 42, 759.
Singh, P. (2010). Subnationalism and social development: A comparative analysis of
     Indian states (Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University).
Stoolmiller, M., Wills, T. A., McClure, A. C., Tanski, S. E., Worth, K. A., Gerrard, M., &
     Sargent, J. D. (2012). Comparing media and family predictors of alcohol use: a
     cohort study of US adolescents. BMJ open, 2(1), e000543.
Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a
     scale     to    assess    three    styles    of   television    mediation:“Instructive
     mediation,”“restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing”. Journal of broadcasting
     & electronic media, 43(1), 52-66.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and
     talk. Cambridge University Press.
Sawyer, R., & Chen, G. M. (2012). The impact of new social media on intercultural
     adaptation. Intercultural Communication Studies. 21.
Wilson, J. (2018). Child-focused practice: A collaborative systemic approach. Routledge.
Young, C. W., Russell, S. V., & Barkemeyer, R. (2017). Social media is not the „silver
bullet‟to reducing household food waste, a response to Grainger and Stew.