0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views6 pages

IntroCtrlSys - Final Exam - 2nd Semester - 1819 - Solution

The document contains 3 problems related to control systems. Problem 1 involves calculating the percentage overshoot and settling time for a given system, and designing a controller to meet specific pole locations and steady state error requirements. Problem 2 involves using Bode diagrams to design a controller to meet a phase margin and steady state error specification. Problem 3 involves verifying the controllability of a system and designing a state feedback controller to place the closed loop poles at given locations.

Uploaded by

Khoa Nguyễn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views6 pages

IntroCtrlSys - Final Exam - 2nd Semester - 1819 - Solution

The document contains 3 problems related to control systems. Problem 1 involves calculating the percentage overshoot and settling time for a given system, and designing a controller to meet specific pole locations and steady state error requirements. Problem 2 involves using Bode diagrams to design a controller to meet a phase margin and steady state error specification. Problem 3 involves verifying the controllability of a system and designing a state feedback controller to place the closed loop poles at given locations.

Uploaded by

Khoa Nguyễn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

HCM City University of Technology FINAL EXAM

Faculty of EE Engineering Second semester, Academic year 2018-2019


Department of Automatic Control Course: Introduction to Control Systems
Exam date: 07/06/2019
---o0o--- Exam duration: 90 minutes
(Students are allowed to use references but not laptops)

Problem 1: (3.5 points)


R(s) Y(s)
+_ GC (s ) G (s )

Figure 1

40
Given a control system in Figure 1, in which G ( s ) 
s ( s  8)
1.1. Let GC ( s )  1, calculate the percentage of overshoot and settling time (5% criterion) of the
system
1.2. Design the controller GC ( s ) such that the closed-loop system has a pair of complex poles
with   0.7 and n  10 , and the steady state error to unit ramp input is 0.02
480
Problem 2: (3.5 points) Given a control system in Figure 1 with G ( s) =
s( s + 4)( s + 30)
Using the Bode diagram, design the controller GC(s) so that the closed-loop system has phase
margin FM * ³ 550 and steady-state error to unit ramp input ess* = 0.05 .

Problem 3: (3.0 points) Given a system described by the state equation:


 x (t )  Ax(t )  Bu(t )

 y (t )  Cx(t )
é0 1ù  1
A= ê ú , B    , C = [1 0]
êë-2 -1úû 1

3.1 Verify the the system is controllable


3.2 Design the state feedback controller so that the closed loop system has two poles at
p1,2  3  j 3 .

Instructor Department Head

1
Solution

Problem 1: (3.5p)

1.1 (1.0p) Calculate POT and ts


- Characteristic equation of the closed-loop system:
1  GC ( s )G ( s )  0
40
 1 0
s ( s  8)
 s 2  8s  40  0 (1)
The characteristic equation has the form:
s 2  2n s  n2  0 (2)

2n  8   0.63


  2  .
n  40 n  4
Suy ra:
  
POT  exp    .100%  7.8%
 1  2 
 
3 3
ts (5%)    0.75(sec)
n 4

1.2 (2.5p) The controller to be designed is a lead-lag compensator: Gc ( s )  Gc1 ( s )Gc 2 ( s )

s  1 /  T1
Design phase lead compensator: Gc1 ( s )  K c1
s  1 / T1
*
- The desired dominant poles: s1,2  n  jn 1   2  7  7.1 j

- The deficiency angle:  *  180  G ( s1* )  180  arg( 7  j 7.1)  arg(7  j 7.1  8) 36.60

 134.6 36.6*   134.6 36.6* 


sin    sin   
1  2 2   2 2  1
- Zero of the controller:  OP  10   7.56
 T1  134.6 36.6 
*
 134.6 36.6 
*
 T1
sin    sin   
 2 2   2 2 
 OPx  *   115 52.5 
sin    sin   
1  2 2   2 2  1
- Calculate the pole:  OP  3   13.21
T1  OPx  *   115 52.5  T1
sin    sin   
 2 2  2 2 
s  7.56
 GC1 ( s )  K C1
s  13.21

2
Note: Pole cancelation method:
s 8
GC1 ( s )  2.48
s  14

s ( s  8)( s  13.21)
 Determine KC1 : K C1   2.38
40( s  7.56) s1*   7  j 7.1

s  7.56
 GC1  s   2.38
s  13.21
* Design the phase lag controller GC 2 ( s ) so that ess*  0.02 (unit ramp input)
1
s
 T2
GC 2  s   K c 2 ; 1
1
s
T2

 After phase lead compensation :


s  7.56 40
KV  lim sGC1 ( s )G ( s )  lim s 2.38  6.81
s 0 s 0 s  13.21 s ( s  8)

1 1
 To meet the steady-state error requirement: ess*  *
 0.02  KV*  *  50
KV ess
KV 6.81
   0.136
KV* 50
1 1
Chose zero:
T
 
Re s1*  7 
T
 0.5

1
pole  0.5    0.068
T

Calculate Kc2:
K C 2  1.0
s  0.5
 GC 2  s  
s  0.068

Conclusion: The transfer function of the controller is:

 s  7.56  s  0.5 
GC ( s)  GC1 ( s).GC 2 ( s )  2.38   
 s  13.21  s  0.068 

Problem 2: (3.5p)
Transfer function of the compensator:
Ts  1
GC ( s )  K C
Ts  1
- Velocity constant before compensation:

3
480
KV  lim sG ( s)  lim s 4
s 0 s 0 s ( s  4)( s  30)
- Desired velocity constant:
1 1
KV*  *   20
ess 0.05
- The gain of the controller:
K * 20
KC  V  5
KV 4
480 20
Denote: G1 ( s )  KC G ( s )  5 
s( s  4)( s  30) s( s / 4  1)( s / 30  1)

The Bode diagram of G1 ( s ) :


Corner frequencies: 1  4; 2  30;
0  1
Point A: 
 L(0 )  20 lg 20  26 (dB)

Bode Diagram
50

-50

-100

12.5
-150
-90

-135

-180

185
-225

-270
10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3
Frequency (rad/s)

Option 1: Phase lead compensator

From the Bode diagram, we have:


4
C  8.3(rad / sec)
1 (C )  1700
M  1800  1 (C )  180  1700  100
The maximum phase of the phase compensator:
max  M *  M    55  (10)  5  500
1  sin max 1  sin 500
   7.55
1  sin max 1  sin 500
The new gain crossover frequency:
L1 (C* )  10lg   10lg(7.55)  8.8dB
From the Bode diagram, we have
C*  13.8(rad / sec)
Calculate T:
1 1
T   0.026
*
C 
13.8 7.55
  T  7.55  0.026  0.2
0.2s  1
Conclusion: The TF of the compensator is: GC ( s )  5
0.026s  1

Option 2: Phase lag compensator

- The new gain crossover frequency satisfies:


1 (C* )  180  M *    180  55  5  1200
From the Bode diagram, we have:
C*  2.0(rad / sec)
- Calculate :
20 lg    L1 (C* )
From the Bode diagram, we have: L1 (C* )  19dB
 20 lg   19
   0.11
1
- Chose  C*
T
1
  0.1
T
  T  10
10
 T  91
0.11
- Conclusion: The transfer function of the compensator is:
10s  1
GC ( s )  5
91s  1

Problem 3: (3p)
3.1 The controllability matrix:

5
æ é-1ù é 0 1 ù é-1ù ö÷ é-1 1ù
C = [ B AB] = ççç ê ú ê ú ê ú÷ = ê ú
çè êë 1 úû êë-2 -1úû êë 1 úû ÷÷ø êë 1 1úû
 det(C ) = -2
 rank (C ) = 2
The system is controlable

3.2 State feedback gain:


The characteristic equation:
det([ sI - A + BK ] = 0
æ é1 0ù é 0 1 ù é-1ù ö
 det ççç s ê ú-ê ú + ê ú [ k1 k2 ]÷÷÷ = 0
èç ëê0 1ûú ëê-2 -1ûú ëê 1 ûú ø÷
æ é s - k1 -1- k2 ù ö÷
 det ççç ê ú÷ = 0
çè êë 2 + k1 s + 1 + k2 úû ÷÷ø
 ( s - k1 )( s + 1 + k2 ) - (2 + k1 )(-1- k2 ) = 0
 s 2 + (1 + k2 - k1 ) s + (2 + 2k2 ) = 0
The desired characteristic equation
( s + 3 - j 3)( s + 3 + j 3) = 0
s 2 + 6 s + 18 = 0
ïì1 + k2 - k1 = 6
 ïí
ïïî2 + 2k2 = 18
ïìk = 3
 ïí 1
ïïîk2 = 8

You might also like