Class 2
Class 2
Cognitive Biases
Belief Perseverance
• Register at https://app.howthemarketworks.com/register/309809
• Name of the contest: Behavioral Finance 2024
• Password: No pasword
• Trading period start 4th April, ends 16th May
• Initial cash balance $100k
• Try to check the account at least once per week, so you can keep track and
execute trades. There are some insightful user guides to help you explore
• Before the Exam date, on the 25th of May, deliver a 1-page report where you
self-analyze your performance from a Behavioral Finance perspective
• A decision maker may have neither the time nor the ability to arrive at a
perfectly optimal decision. Individuals strive to make good decisions by
simplifying the choices available, using a subset of the information available,
and discarding some possible alternatives to choose among a smaller number
• They are content to accept a solution that is “good enough” rather than
attempting to find the optimal answer. In doing so, they may unintentionally
bias the decision-making process. These biases may lead to irrational behaviors
and decisions
• Definition:
▪ a statistical sampling or testing error caused by systematically favoring
some outcomes over others
▪ a preference or an inclination, especially one that inhibits impartial
judgment
▪ an inclination or prejudice in favor of a particular viewpoint
▪ an inclination of temperament or outlook, especially a personal and
sometimes unreasoned judgment
• Firstly, we focus on BFMI and the behavioral biases that individuals may
exhibit when making financial decisions
• “To invest successfully over a lifetime does not require a stratospheric IQ, unusual
business insight, or inside information. What’s needed is a sound intellectual framework
for decisions and the ability to keep emotions from corroding that framework”
Impact:
• Once a behavioral bias has been identified, it may be possible to either moderate
the bias or adapt to the bias so that the resulting financial decisions more closely
match the rational financial decisions assumed by traditional finance
• Cognitive errors are more easily corrected than emotional biases. Because
cognitive errors stem from faulty reasoning, better information, education, and
advice can often correct for them
• Individuals are better able to adapt their behaviors or modify their processes if
the source of the bias is logically identifiable, even if not completely
understood
• When a bias is adapted to, it is accepted and decisions are made that recognize
and adjust for it (rather than making an attempt to reduce or eliminate it)
James Montier
• Gilovich, Thomas. How We Know What Isn't' So: The Fallibility of Human
Reason in Everyday Life (New York: The Free Press, 1993)
• Attach undue emphasis to events that corroborate the outcomes we desire and
downplay whatever contrary evidence arises
1. Once we have a previous conception on how a stock should move, when new
information that contradicts our view comes to the market, we are slow to react
to that new information. So this make investors underreact to new information.
▪ Example: stock faces a decline due to new competition but investors keep prior beliefs
• Making sure to seek out information that could contradict—not just confirm—
their investment decisions
• Employees should monitor any negative press regarding their own companies
and conduct research on any competing firms
• Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., and Merill, L.
2009. “Feeling Validated Versus Being Correct: A Meta-Analysis of Selective
Exposure to Information.”
• Park, J., Konana, P., Gu, B., Kumar, A., and Raghunathan, R. 2013. “Information
Valuation and Confirmation Bias in Virtual Communities: Evidence from Stock
Message Boards.”
• When people are confronted with a new phenomenon that is inconsistent with
any of their preconstructed classifications, they subject it to those classifications
anyway, relying on a rough best-fit approximation
1. Base-Rate Neglect
Investors attempt to determine the potential success of, say, an investment by
contextualizing the venture in a familiar, easy-to-understand classification scheme
▪ Example: “Value stock”, it is just a stereotype
2. Sample-Size Neglect
Investors when judging the likelihood of a particular investment outcome often fail
to accurately consider the sample size of the data on which they base their
judgments
▪ Example: assume that small sample sizes are representative of populations (or “real” data)
• Investors create mental shortcut which simplify reality, but that might not be
accurate, leading them to make oversimplified decisions
1. Investors can make significant financial errors when they examine a money
manager’s track record (sample-size neglect)
▪ Example: looking at recent past performance of a fund manager
2. Investors also make similar mistakes when investigating track records of stock
analysts (sample-size neglect)
3. Investors can read negative news about a particular player in an industry and
try to sell their stocks in that industry (base-rate neglect)
▪ Example: unload oil stocks just because one oil company went bankrupt
• Remember the first example, where you have group A, group B and their
intersection. How probable is it that you are get it right?
• Khan, H. H., Naz, I., Qureshi, F., and Ghafoor, A. 2017. “Heuristics and stock
buying decision: Evidence from Malaysian and Pakistani stock markets.”
• Test if the ratios commonly used to make financial decisions are indeed good
predictors of investments success
• The illusion of control bias describes the tendency of human beings to believe
that they can control or at least influence outcomes when, in fact, they cannot
• People have a belief they are in control of situations if the outcomes of those
situations have an influence on them
• That is probably because it gives them a sense of comfort that they can control
the outcomes of events that impact their life's
• In the casino game, various research has demonstrated that people actually cast
the dice more vigorously when they are trying to attain a higher number
• Observed that people who were permitted to select their own numbers in a
hypothetical lottery game were also willing to pay a higher price per ticket than
subjects gambling on randomly assigned numbers
• People think that if they are in the driving seat, the probabilities of having a car
accident is lower, which might not be entirely true
• Investors think that by having more information about a company they will be
able to better control their investments, while management and the market will
be the ones deciding the future of a company
1. Illusion of control bias can lead investors to trade more than is prudent
▪ Example: online traders believe themselves to possess more control over the outcomes of
their investments than they actually do. Excessive trading decreases returns
3. Illusion of control bias can cause investors to use limit orders and other such
techniques in order to experience a false sense of control over their investments
▪ Example: because an investor has a buying limit order below market price might give them
the illusion they will catch a good price, but things might have changed for that particular
stock
“I knew it all along”. Once an event has elapsed, people afflicted with hindsight bias tend
to perceive that the event was predictable—even if it wasn’t. This behavior is precipitated
by the fact that actual outcomes are more readily grasped by people’s minds than the
infinite array of outcomes that could have but didn’t materialize
• Selective memory of past events, actions, or what was knowable in the past.
Tendency to remember correct views and forget mistakes
• On the opposite side, people feel good when they are right, it is awarding for
our ego
▪ Example: from 1998 to 2001 every investor was fully on in the market, without
acknowledging it was a bubble, because “this time is different”. Only afterwards was
it clear that it was in fact a bubble.
▪ Are we going to experience the same for equity market now – in the US?
3. Hindsight-biased investors also change the story when they fare poorly and
block out recollections of prior, incorrect forecasts in order to alleviate
embarrassment
4. Hindsight-biased investors can unduly fault their money managers when funds
perform poorly
5. Conversely, hindsight bias can cause investors to unduly praise their money
managers when funds perform well
• Investors should not unduly criticize money managers for poor performance,
by understanding the economic and returns cycle and check current market
conditions
• Nor should investors unduly praise money managers for good performance,
again the cycle and the recent market returns are probably the cause that
justifies such performances
• Christensen-Szalanski, J.J.J. and C.F. Willham, 1991. The hindsight bias: A meta-
analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
• Confirmation
• Representativeness
• Illusion of control
• Hindsight