0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views6 pages

IELTS Academic Reading Free Samples. Sample 2.2 - IELTS-up

The document discusses how H.G. Wells predicted the invention of the atomic bomb in his 1914 novel despite it not becoming a reality until the 1930s. It describes how Leo Szilard was inspired by Wells' work and had the key insight of nuclear chain reaction, which led to the Manhattan Project. It also discusses the roles of Winston Churchill and British scientists in the development of early nuclear weapons.

Uploaded by

Louie Lu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views6 pages

IELTS Academic Reading Free Samples. Sample 2.2 - IELTS-up

The document discusses how H.G. Wells predicted the invention of the atomic bomb in his 1914 novel despite it not becoming a reality until the 1930s. It describes how Leo Szilard was inspired by Wells' work and had the key insight of nuclear chain reaction, which led to the Manhattan Project. It also discusses the roles of Winston Churchill and British scientists in the development of early nuclear weapons.

Uploaded by

Louie Lu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Writing

Listening Reading Writing Speaking Exercises


correction

IELTS IELTS Academic Reading Test 2. Section 2


vocabulary Free IELTS
lessons signup
Writing This is the second section of IELTS Reading test #2. Read the text

Start Your
Your name
below and answer the questions online. After that, click 'check' and
Speaking
proceed to the next section. Your Email

Maximize
your score!
Free Trial Subscribe!

READING PASSAGE 2 Sign up & start your free long


IELTS test trial now. No obligation and no
samples You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 17–27, which are payment setup required.
based on Reading Passage 2 below.
Listening
WhosOff
Reading

Writing

Speaking The atom bomb was one of the defining inventions of the 20th Century. So how did
science fiction writer HG Wells predict its invention three decades before the first
detonations?
Speaking
simulator

(A) Imagine you're the greatest fantasy writer of your age. One day you dream up
the idea of a bomb of infinite power. You call it the "atomic bomb". HG Wells first
imagined a uranium-based hand grenade that "would continue to explode
indefinitely" in his 1914 novel The World Set Free. He even thought it would be
dropped from planes. What he couldn't predict was how a strange conjunction of his
friends and acquaintances - notably Winston Churchill, who'd read all Wells's novels
twice, and the physicist Leo Szilard - would turn the idea from fantasy to reality,
leaving them deeply tormented by the scale of destructive power that it unleashed.

Original Asian Antiques

(B) The story of the atom bomb starts in the Edwardian age, when scientists such
as Ernest Rutherford were grappling with a new way of conceiving the physical
world. The idea was that solid elements might be made up of tiny particles in
atoms. "When it became apparent that the Rutherford atom had a dense nucleus,
there was a sense that it was like a coiled spring," says Andrew Nahum, curator of
the Science Museum's Churchill's Scientists exhibition. Wells was fascinated with
the new discoveries. He had a track record of predicting technological innovations.
Winston Churchill credited Wells for coming up with the idea of using aeroplanes
and tanks in combat ahead of World War One.

Free Messianic Bible

(C) The two men met and discussed ideas over the decades, especially as
Churchill, a highly popular writer himself, spent the interwar years out of political
power, contemplating the rising instability of Europe. Churchill grasped the danger
of technology running ahead of human maturity, penning a 1924 article in the Pall
Mall Gazette called "Shall we all commit suicide?". In the article, Churchill wrote:
"Might a bomb no bigger than an orange be found to possess a secret power to
destroy a whole block of buildings - nay to concentrate the force of a thousand tons
of cordite and blast a township at a stroke?" This idea of the orange-sized bomb is
credited by Graham Farmelo, author of Churchill's Bomb, directly to the imagery of
The World Set Free.

WhosOff - Annual Leave Tracker

(D) By 1932 British scientists had succeeded in splitting the atom for the first
time by artificial means, although some believed it couldn't produce huge amounts
of energy. But the same year the Hungarian emigre physicist Leo Szilard read The
World Set Free. Szilard believed that the splitting of the atom could produce vast
energy. He later wrote that Wells showed him "what the liberation of atomic energy
on a large scale would mean". Szilard suddenly came up with the answer in
September 1933 - the chain reaction - while watching the traffic lights turn green in
Russell Square in London. He wrote: "It suddenly occurred to me that if we could
find an element which is split by neutrons and which would emit two neutrons when
it absorbed one neutron, such an element, if assembled in sufficiently large mass,
could sustain a nuclear chain reaction."
Spend over
£300, get £50
off
Get the best value
Xiaomi smartphones at
incredible prices

Xiaomi United Kingdom Shop now

(E) In that eureka moment, Szilard also felt great fear - of how a bustling city like
London and all its inhabitants could be destroyed in an instant as he reflected in his
memoir published in 1968:
"Knowing what it would mean - and I knew because I had read HG Wells - I did not
want this patent to become public." The Nazis were on the rise and Szilard was
deeply anxious about who else might be working on the chain reaction theory and
an atomic Bomb. Wells's novel Things To Come, turned into a 1936 film, The Shape
of Things to Come, accurately predicted aerial bombardment and an imminent
devastating world war. In 1939 Szilard drafted the letter Albert Einstein sent to
President Roosevelt warning America that Germany was stockpiling uranium. The
Manhattan Project was born.

£43/hr: Private Cleaner Needed

(F) Szilard and several British scientists worked on it with the US military's
massive financial backing. Britons and Americans worked alongside each other in
"silos" - each team unaware of how their work fitted together. They ended up moving
on from the original enriched uranium "gun" method, which had been conceived in
Britain, to create a plutonium implosion weapon instead. Szilard campaigned for a
demonstration bomb test in front of the Japanese ambassador to give them a
chance to surrender. He was horrified that it was instead dropped on a city. In 1945
Churchill was beaten in the general election and in another shock, the US
government passed the 1946 McMahon Act, shutting Britain out of access to the
atomic technology it had helped create. William Penney, one of the returning Los
Alamos physicists, led the team charged by Prime Minister Clement Atlee with
somehow putting together their individual pieces of the puzzle to create a British
bomb on a fraction of the American budget.
Highly rated suspense novel
Author S Jennifer Paulson

(G) "It was a huge intellectual feat," Andrew Nahum observes. "Essentially they
reworked the calculations that they'd been doing in Los Alamos. They had the
services of Klaus Fuchs, who [later] turned out to be an atom spy passing
information to the Soviet Union, but he also had a phenomenal memory." Another
British physicist, Patrick Blackett, who discussed the Bomb after the war with a
German scientist in captivity, observed that there were no real secrets. According to
Nahum he said: "It's a bit like making an omelette. Not everyone can make a good
one."When Churchill was re-elected in 1951 he "found an almost complete weapon
ready to test and was puzzled and fascinated by how Atlee had buried the costs in
the budget", says Nahum. "He was very conflicted about whether to go ahead with
the test and wrote about whether we should have 'the art and not the article'.
Meaning should it be enough to have the capability… [rather] than to have a
dangerous weapon in the armoury."

(H) Churchill was convinced to go ahead with the test, but the much more
powerful hydrogen bomb developed three years later worried him greatly.HG Wells
died in 1946. He had been working on a film sequel to The Shape of Things To
Come that was to include his concerns about the now-realised atomic bomb he'd
first imagined. But it was never made. Towards the end of his life, says Nahum,
Wells's friendship with Churchill "cooled a little". "Wells considered Churchill as an
enlightened but tarnished member of the ruling classes." And Churchill had little
time for Wells's increasingly fanciful socialist utopian ideas.

(I) Wells believed technocrats and scientists would ultimately run a peaceful new
world order like in The Shape of Things To Come, even if global war destroyed the
world as we knew it first. Churchill, a former soldier, believed in the lessons of
history and saw diplomacy as the only way to keep mankind from self-destruction in
the atomic age. Wells's scientist acquaintance Leo Szilard stayed in America and
campaigned for civilian control of atomic energy, equally pessimistic about Wells's
idea of a bold new scientist-led world order. If anything Szilard was tormented by
the power he had helped unleash. In 1950, he predicted a cobalt bomb that would
destroy all life on the planet. In Britain, the legacy of the Bomb was a remarkable
period of elite scientific innovation as the many scientists who had worked on
weaponry or radar returned to their civilian labs. They gave us the first commercial
jet airliner, the Comet, near-supersonic aircraft and rockets, highly engineered
computers, and the Jodrell Bank giant moveable radio telescope.

(J) The latter had nearly ended the career of its champion, physicist Bernard
Lovell, with its huge costs, until the 1957 launch of Sputnik, when it emerged that
Jodrell Bank had the only device in the West that could track it. Nahum says Lovell
reflected that "during the war the question was never what will something cost. The
question was only can you do it and how soon can we have it? And that was the
spirit he took into his peacetime science." Austerity and the tiny size of the British
market, compared with America, were to scupper those dreams. But though the
Bomb created a new terror, for a few years at least, Britain saw a vision of a benign
atomic future, too and believed it could be the shape of things to come.

Questions 17–25

Reading Passage 2 has ten paragraphs, A–J.

Which paragraph contains the following information?

Write the correct letter, A–J, in boxes 17–25 on your answer sheet. Note that one paragraph is not used.

17. Scientific success

18. Worsening relations

19. The dawn of the new project

20. Churchill's confusion

21. Different perspectives

22. Horrifying prediction

23. Leaving Britain behind the project

24. Long-term discussion

25. New idea

Questions 26–27

Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

Write the correct letter in boxes 26–27 on your answer sheet.

26. How can you describe the relations between Churchill and Wells throughout the years?

A. passionate → friendly → adverse


B. curious → friendly
C. respectful → friendly → inhospitable

D. friendly → respectful → hostile

27. What is the type of this text?

A. science-fiction story

B. article from the magazine

C. historical text

D. Wells autobiography
Hide answers

ANSWERS

Each question correctly answered scores 1 mark. Correct spelling is needed in all
answers.

Section 2

17. D
18. H
19. E
20. G
21. I
22. A
23. F
24. C
25. B
26. C
27. B

Check

£43/hr: Private
Cleaner Needed

Trusted Cleaning Jobs Apply Now

Contact us About the project


© ielts-up.com, 2015-2019. All rights reserved.

You might also like