PHS 302 (Quantum)
PHS 302 (Quantum)
UNIVERSITY OF LAGOS
QUANTUM MECHANICS I
(PHS 302)
MODULE
1
TABLE OF CONTENT S Page
2
Summary of Study Session 3 ........................................................................................................... 32
Self- Assessment Questions for Study Session 3............................................................................ 32
Study Session 4 OPERATORS AND RELATED TOPICS ................................................................ 34
4.0 Main Content........................................................................................................... 34
4.1 Linear Operators…………………………………………………………………….36
3
7.2 The Correspondence Principle……………………………………………………………69
4
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
The dynamics of a quantum system is governed by the celebrated Schrödinger equation
𝑑
𝑖ħ |ψ⟩
𝑑𝑡
where i = √−1 and ħ = 1.05457266 × 10−34 J s is Planck’s h-bar constant. However, what is the
meaning of the symbols |ψ⟩ and H? The answers will be given in the first part of the course
(chapters 1-4), which reviews several physical and mathematical concepts that are needed to
formulate the theory of quantum mechanics. We will learn that |ψ⟩ in equation above represents
the ket-vector state of the system and H represents the Hamiltonian operator H represents the
Hamiltonian operator. The operator H is directly related to the Hamiltonian function in classical
physics, which will be defined in the first chapter. The ket-vector state and its physical meaning
will be introduced in the second chapter. Chapter 3 reviews the position and momentum operators,
whereas chapter 4 discusses dynamics of quantum systems. The second part of the course
(chapters 6-10) is devoted to some relatively simple quantum systems include solutions to
Schrodinger’s equation and Scattering states. Most of the material in these lecture notes is based
on the textbooks in the references.
5
Study Session 1 Vector Spaces and Operators
Introduction
In order to grasp Quantum Mechanics, you need to be conversant with Vector Spaces and other basic ideas
of mathematics. The vector space of twice integrable functions enable you to define a set of functions that
would form a set of ‘coordinates’ for the vector-like functions, such that as we expand a given vector in 2-
dimensional Euclidean space as a linear combination like ai + bj, we could also expand a given ‘quantum-
mechanical function’ as a linear combination of the set of functions. This Unit will teach you how to go
about setting up the set of functions that we shall call an orthonormal set. You shall learn to expand a given
function in terms of the orthonormal set, and get to know how to recover the coefficient of expansion of a
particular function.
No doubt, you are quite familiar with the concept of a vector. With vector spaces, we are generalising this
basic idea. In other words, we shall have ‘vectors’ that are no longer just ordinary geometrical vectors, but
vectors of a different kind, but all having similar properties. We shall come across matrices that functions
that you could give the same treatment as you did geometrical vectors.
Definition
Given a set
v1 , v2 ,..., vn = S . If
vi v j S i, j 1, 2, ..., n
(i) 1.1
(ii)
vi S i, 1, 2, .., n ; 1.2
𝛼 𝜖 𝐾 , where 𝐾 is a field, e.g., the real number line ( 𝑅) or the complex plane ( 𝐶) Then, ( 𝑆)
is called a vector space or linear space. The vector space is a real vector space if 𝐾 ≡ 𝑅 , and a
6
Condition (i) says that if you add any two vectors of the vector space you will get a member of the space.
Condition (ii) shows that a linear multiplication of any two vectors produces a vector also in the vector
space. That certainly makes sense, doesn’t it? You don’t want a situation where you add two vectors in
your space and get a vector not in the space. Moreover, you avoid a situation where multiplying by a
constant takes your vector away from the space. We are now safe to carry out either operation without
worrying whether the vector we get is a ‘sensible’ vector, because we are sure it is.
A way to remember these two conditions is: Additivity [condition (i)] + homogeneity [condition (ii)] =
linearity.
a1 v1 a2 v 2 an v n = 0 1.9
and this implies the constants 𝑎1 = 𝑎2 = ⋯ = 𝑎𝑛 = 0, then we say{𝑣𝑖 }𝑛𝑖=1 is a linearly independent set.
If even just one of them is non-zero, then the set is linearly dependent. Think of it: a 3-dimensional
Cartesian vector will be a zero vector, 0, notice the boldface type (not zero scalar), if and only if the three
components are independently zero. Thus, for instance, i, j, and k, the traditional unit vectors in 3-
dimensional Cartesian space are linearly independent. Mathematically, this means that 𝜶𝒊 + 𝜷𝒋 + 𝜸𝒌 = 𝟎
if and only if 𝛼 = 𝛽 = 𝛾 = 0.
Let V be an n - dimensional vector space. Any set of n linearly independent vectors 𝑒1 , 𝑒2 , … , 𝑒𝑛 . forms a
basis for V . Thus, any vector v V can be expressed as a linear combination of the vectors𝑒1 , 𝑒2 , … , 𝑒𝑛 . ,
i.e.,
x x1e1 x2 e 2 xn e n
1.10
Then we say that the vector space 𝑉 is spanned by the set of vectors{𝑒1 , 𝑒2 , … , 𝑒𝑛 } and that the set
{𝑒1 , 𝑒2 , … , 𝑒𝑛 }. It is said to be a basis for 𝑉.
If we wish to write any vector in 1 (say 𝑥.) direction, we need only one (if possible, a unit) vector. Any two
vectors in the x direction must be linearly dependent, for we can write one as 𝑎1 𝑖, and the other 𝑎2 𝑖, where
a1 and a 2 are scalars.
7
Where 𝑎1 , and 𝑎1 , are scalar constants.
𝑎2
Obviously,𝑐1 and 𝑐2 need not be zero for the expression to hold, for 𝑐1 = 𝑐2 would also satisfy
𝑎1
expression (1.11).
Can you then see that we can say that in general, any 𝑛 + 1 vectors in an 𝑛 −dimensional space must be
linearly dependent?
Here, we shall expand your idea of the inner product of two vectors. In your first year in the
University, you came across the dot or inner product of two vectors. In this section, we shall
extend that idea, as mathematicians do, to other vector-like quantities. But first, let us take a look
at the properties of an inner product.
(v) ( v, w z) ( v, w) ( v, z) 1.16
( v, w ) v w
(vi) 1.17
8
1.5 Norm of a Vector
Let X be a vector space over K , the real or complex number field. A real valued function ∥∥ on X is a
norm on X (i.e. ∥∥∶ 𝑋 ⟶ 𝑅) if and only if the following conditions are satisfied:
x 0
(i) 1.19
x 0
(ii) If and only if x 0 1.20
xy x y x, y X
(iii) (Triangle inequality) 1.21
x x x X and C
(iv) (Absolute homogeneity) 1.22
The norm of a vector is its “distance” from the origin. Once again, you can see the basic idea of the
distance of a point from the origin being generalised to the case of the vectors in any vector space.
x
is called the norm of x. In the case where X R , the real number line, the norm is the absolute value,
x
.If the norm of v in the vector space V is unity, such a vector is said to be normalised. In any case, even
if a vector is not normalised, we can normalise it by dividing by the norm.
In-text questions
V3 a, b V3 , R .
a b V3
(i) 1.3
(ii) a V3 1.4
Of course, you know that when two 3-dimensional vectors are added, you also get a 3-dimensional vector.
Moreover, multiplying a 3-dimensional vector by a real constant will give you a 3-dimensional vector.
𝑓(𝑥), 𝑔(𝑥) ∈ 𝐹, 𝜆 𝜖 𝑅 or C
9
(i) f ( x) g ( x) F 1.7
(ii) f ( x) F 1.8
Adding two functions of x will result in a function of x. It just has to be. Also, multiplying a function of x
by a real number, you get a function of x.
Solution
Where 𝜙1 = 𝒊 , 𝜙2 = 2𝒊 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜙3 = 𝒋
Solution
c1 0, c2 0, c3 0
xi yj zk 0 Implies x 0, y 0, z 0
5. You are quite familiar with the set of vectors (i, j) as the normal basis vectors in 2-dimensional space or
a plane. Show that (i j, i j) is also a set of basis vectors for the plane.
10
Solution
We check for linear independence.
(i j) (i j) 0
Then,
i( ) j( ) 0
Adding the last two equations makes us conclude that.𝛼 = 0 Consequently, 𝛽 is also 0. We conclude that
the two vectors are linearly independent. Since these are two linearly independent vectors in two
dimensional (Euclidean) space (a plane), they form a basis for the plane.
6: Given the vectors a and b in 3-dimensions, i.e., 𝑉0 , we define the inner product as (a, b) a b where
T
a T is the transpose of the column matrix representing a. This is the dot product you have always been
familiar with.
1 2
a = [0],and b =[1], 𝑎𝑇 = [1 0 1]
1 1
2
(a, b) a b 1 0 11 3
T
1
Do not mix
d x c x
(c, d) c d c x
T
cy
c z d y c x d x c y d y c z d z d x dy
d z c y (d, c)
d z c z
, with
c x c x d x cx d y cx d z
T
cd c y d x dy
d z c y d x cyd y
c y d z dc T
c z c z d x cz d y c z d z
V
6. Given the vector a in 3 , the norm of a is
11
a (a, a)
1.23
1
0
1
Thus, if a = , then
1
(a, a) 1 0 10 2
1
a (a, a) 2
1
a 1
c 0
a 2
1
However, is normalised.
SAQ 1
Show that the following are vector spaces over the indicated field:
(i) The set of real numbers over the field of real numbers.
(ii) The set of complex numbers over the field of real numbers.
(iii) The set of quadratic polynomials over the complex field.
12
SAQ 2
(i) 2i 3 j k , i j 3k and 3i 2 j k
SAQ 3
1 1
,
1 1
Show whether or not the set is a basis for the two-dimensional Euclidean space.
SAQ 4
1 2
Find the coordinates of the vector 2 i with respect to the basis
1 0 0 1 0 i 1 0
, , ,
0 1 1 0 i 0 0 1 .
References/Further Readings
2. Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering – Riley, K. F., Hobson, M. P. and Bence,
S. J.
13
Study Session 2 ORTHOGONALITY AND ORTHONOMALITY
Introduction
Orthogonal functions play an important role in Quantum mechanics. This is because they afford us a set of
functions ‘which do not mix,’ just the way you could resolve a vector in two dimensions in the x and y
directions, respectively, with the unit vectors i and j. The dot product of the two unit vectors gives you
zero. We would also like to resolve our vectors in some ‘directions.’ Thus, you need to know about
orthogonal and orthonormal functions. The orthonormal functions would form the possible states you can
find a system. You know such states should not ‘mix.’ In this Unit, you will learn about Orthonormality
and Orthogonality; how to create an orthogonal and subsequently, an orthonormal set and expand a given
function in terms of an orthonormal set. This would naturally lead to an analysis of the probability of
finding a system in any of the states in the orthonormal set. This Unit also gives you an insight into some
elements of matrix algebra.
(i) We say v 1 and v 2 in a vector space V are orthogonal if their inner product is zero, that is,
( v1 , v 2 ) 0 .
(ii) Suppose there exists a linearly independent set,{∅𝑖 }𝑛𝑖=1 i.e., ,{∅1 , ∅2 , … , ∅𝑛 }. such that
( i , j ) 0 i j
,
n
, then, i i 1 is an orthogonal set.
0 𝑖𝑓 𝑖 ≠ 𝑗
For an orthonormal set, therefore, we can write,(∅𝑖 , ∅𝑗 ) = 𝛿𝑖𝑗 where 𝛿𝑖𝑗 = {
1 𝑖𝑓 𝑖 = 𝑗 .
14
As we have seen earlier, if any vector in the vector space, V , can be written as a linear combination
n
v a11 a 2 2 a n n ai i
i 1 2.1
( m , n ) mn
2.2
If
i in1 is an orthonormal set, It follows that we can recover the coefficient of expansion as follows:
n n
( j , v) ( j , ai i ) ai ( j , i ) a j
i 1 i 1 2.3
Moreover,
n n n n n
( v, v) ( a k k , ai i ) a k * ai ( j , i ) ai
2
k 1 i 1 k 1 i 1 i 1 2.4
If, in addition, the vector v is normalised, then ( v, v) 1 and consequent upon equation (2.4),
n
a 1
2
i
i 1
2.5
Do you remember what you learnt about probability in Statistics? The sum of the probability for various
2
ai
possible events is unity. Thus, we can interpret the as the probability that the system which has n
2
a
possible states, assumes state i with probability i . In other words, the probability that the system is in
2
ai
state i is .
We have written the inner product in the form (,) . We could also write it in the form of a bra, | , and a
ket, | . This is the Dirac notation. Putting the bra and the ket together forms a ‘bracket’ | . The set
{ j }nj 1 {| j }nj 1
of vectors can be seen as a set of bra vectors (space of vectors) . Then, we would need a
{ j |} j 1
n
dual set of vectors (dual space of vectors) to be able to write the inner product. Why? Recall
that we needed to change our column vectors to row vectors to be able to take the inner product of two
15
column vectors? If | B is a column vector, then B | is the dual vector, the row vector but with the
entries being the complex conjugate of what they were as | B .
It follows from the foregoing, that we can write the expansion of a wave function
n
c j j cj | j
j as j 1 2.6
( j , a j ) a( j , j ) (a j , j ) a * ( j , j )
Moreover, and .It follows that
a( j , j ) ( j , a j ) (a * j , j ) (a*) * ( j , j )
. We can extract the following rule from this:
( j , a j ) (a * j , j )
2.7
( j , A j ) ( A j , j )
2.8
j | A | j A j | j
k 1 i 1 k 1 i 1 i 1 2.10
An even function is symmetrical about the y axis. In other words, a plane mirror placed on the axis will
produce an image that is exactly the function across the axis. An example is shown in Fig …a. An odd
function will need to be mirrored twice, once along the y axis, and once along the x axis to achieve the
same effect. Fig. … b is an example of an odd function.
2 n 1
A function f (x) of x is said to be an odd function if f ( x) f ( x) , e.g., sin x, x , and a function
f (x) of x is said to be an even function if f ( x) f ( x) , e.g., cos x, x where n 0,1, 2, ....
2n
16
0 0
Some real-valued functions are odd, some are even; the rest are neither odd nor even. However, we can
write any real-valued function as a sum of an odd and an even function.
Where 𝑓(𝑥) is odd and 𝑔(𝑥) is even. Then, 𝑓(−𝑥) = −𝑓(𝑥) and 𝑔(−𝑥) = 𝑔(𝑥)
h( x ) f ( x ) g ( x ) f ( x ) g ( x ) 2.12
h( x) h( x) 2 g ( x)
h( x ) h( x ) 2 f ( x )
h( x) h( x)
f ( x)
2 2.13
and
h( x) h( x)
g ( x)
2 2.14
17
2.4 Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalisation Procedure
This provides a method of constructing an orthogonal set from a given set. Normalising each member of
the set then provides an orthonormal set. The method entails setting up the first vector, and then
constructing the next member of the orthogonal set by making it orthogonal to the first member of the set
under construction. Then the next member of the set is constructed in a way to be orthogonal to
the two preceding members. This procedure can be continued until the last member of the set is
constructed.
In-text question
1. Write the function h( x) e sin x as a sum of odd and even functions
2x
Solution
cosh 2 x sin x
sinh 2 x sin x
It is obvious that the odd function is a product of an odd function and an even function. Likewise, the even
function is a product of two odd functions. We conclude, therefore, that the following rules apply:
The integral
18
𝑎
∫−𝑎 𝑓(𝑥)𝑑𝑥 = 0 If 𝑓(𝑥) is odd 2.18
𝑎 𝑎
∫−𝑎 𝑓(𝑥)𝑑𝑥 = 2 ∫0 𝑓(𝑥)𝑑𝑥 If 𝑓(𝑥) is even 2.19
Recall that the inner product in the space of twice integrable complex valued functions of two complex
valued functions 𝑓(𝑥) and 𝑔(𝑥) over the interval a x b is defined as (𝑓, 𝑔) = ∫ 𝑓 ∗ (𝑥)𝑔(𝑥)𝑑𝑥.Two
𝑏
𝑎
functions 𝑓(𝑥)and 𝑔(𝑥)are said to be orthogonal over an interval 𝑎 ≤ 𝑥 ≥ 𝑏 if their inner product is zero.
2
Construct an orthonormal set from the set 1, x, x ,... over the interval 1 x 1 . Thus, given the set
f1 , f 2 , f 3 ,..., we want to construct an orthogonal set 1 , 2 ,3 ,..., i.e.
1
1
i ( x) j ( x)dx
= 0, if i j , then we normalise each member of the set.
(1 , 2 ) 0
1 1
1 x2
11 ( x ) dx
2
x 0
1 1
2.20
0
Thus, 2 x
Let
3 f 3 2 1 x 2 x
(1 , 3 ) 0 ( 2 , 3 ) 0
subject to and
19
1
1
1 (x 2 x )dx
=0 2.21
or
1 1 1
x3 x 2 2x 2
x 1 2 x
1
3 1
2 1
3 0 =0 2.22
2
2 0
3 2.23
or
1
3 2.24
Or
1 1 1
x4 x 3 x 2
0
4 1
3 1
2 1 2.25
1
2x 3
0
3 0
or
0 2.26
Putting the values of and from equations (2.24) and (2.26) into the expression
3 f 3 2 1 x 2 x , we arrive at
1
3 x 2
3 2.27
j
To normalise , we multiply the function by a normalisation constant, A , say, and invoke the relation
20
1
A 2 j ( x)dx 1
2
1 2.28
from which
2 A2 1
1
A
or 2
1
1
The normalised function 2 2.29
Similarly,
1
1
A 2 x 2 dx 1
3 1
1 1
2
x A
A 2
A 2
2
1
3 1
3 3 3
3
A2
Thus, 2.
3
2 x
2
In like manner,
2
1 2 1 1
2 4 2 2 1
1 A x 3 dx 20 A x 3 x 9 dx
2
=1
from which
1
x5 2x3 x
2A
2
1
5 9 90
21
or
1 2 1
2 A2 1
5 9 9
80 2
A 1
Therefore, 45
45 2 1
2 x
The normalised function 8 3
n
3. Example from the n-dimensional Euclidean space, R
Suppose we are given two vectors u and v. The projection of v onto u is indeed,
𝜃 𝒖
∥ 𝒗 ∥ cos 𝜃
Where is the angle between the two vectors, and û is the unit vector in the direction of u, and.
u uv
uˆ cos
u u v u v cos u v
Therefore, . But . So,
Hence,
uv u (u, v )
Pru v v
u u2 u
(u, v )
u
u v (u, u) 2.30
since (u, u) | u | .
2
u1 v1 2.31
The projection of 𝒗𝟐 onto 𝒖𝟏 is 𝑃𝑟𝑢1 𝒗𝟐. This is the component of 𝒗𝟐 in the direction of 𝒖𝟏. The
22
u 2 v 2 Pru1 v 2
2.32
v3
Similarly the components of perpendicular to both 𝒖𝟏 and 𝒖𝟐 is,
u 3 v 3 Pru1 v 3 Pru2 v 3
2.33
In general then,
n 1
u n v n Prui v n
i 1 2.34
uk
ek
|| u k || 2.35
Note that
Pru v projects vector v orthogonally onto vector u.
SAQ 2.1
Which of the following functions are even and which ones are odd?
23
SAQ 2.2
Show that
References/Further Readings
2. Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering – Riley, K. F., Hobson, M. P. and Bence,
S. J.
24
Study Session 3 SOME USEFUL MATHEMATICS ON MATRICES
Introduction
You shall need the following because we often represent an operator in quantum mechanics by a matrix.
e
We shall take as the usual basis in 3-dimensional space, { e1 , e 2 , 3 }. You may also see this basis as {i, j,
k}.
Objectives
Orthonormal functions
Expansion of a given function as a linear combination of a set of orthonormal functions (states).
Recovering the coefficient of the expansion.
Finding the probability of finding the system in a given state.
Some elements of matrix algebra.
Since (Qa) (Qb) b {Q (Qa)} b {(Q Q)a} , a necessary and sufficient condition for Q to be
T T
orthogonal is
QQ T I
3.1
or equivalently,
Q 1 Q T
3.2
Note that
det(Q) det(Q)
25
det( Q) 1
2
det(Q) 1 3.3
det( I Q) ( I I and Q I )
TT
T
e 3 Qe 3 e 3
Therefore, 1 is an eigenvalue so that .
e
Choose e1 , e 2 to be orthonormal to 3 . In terms of this basis,
a b 0
Q c d 0
0 0 1
3.4
a c 0
Q b d 0
T
0 0 1
3.5
1 0 0 a b ac bd 0
2 2
QQ T 0 1 0 ca bd c2 d 2 0
0 0 1 0 0 1
3.6
a2 b2 1 c2 d 2 3.7
26
ac bd 0 ca bd 3.8
Also,
det(Q) 1 ad bc 3.9
ac
b
From equation 3.8, d
ac 2
ad 1
d 3.10
a(c 2 d 2 ) d a d
Therefore,
a b 0
Q b a 0
0 0 1
3.11
with a b 1 .
2 2
so
cos sin 0
Q sin cos 0
0 0 1
3.12
If you represent the three unit vectors in 3-dimensional Euclidean space by i, j, k, this corresponds to a
rotation about an axis perpendicular to k .
27
3.2 Symmetric Matrices
Choose
e1 , e 2 , e 3 , ,
as eigenvectors of A , with eigenvalues 1 2 3 .
Ae k k e k 3.13
k (e k e j ) Ae k e j
3.14
e k AT e j
e k Ae j
j (e k e j )
.
j k ek e j 0
This means that if , then
e1 , e2 , e3 e i e j ij
Choose to be unit vectors, then, .
Aii i
This means that we could represent a symmetric matrix as a diagonal matrix with only the entries :
1 0 0
A0 2 0
0 0 3
3.15
A A 3.17
28
3.4 Unitary Matrices
The complex analogue of a real orthogonal matrix is a unitary matrix, i.e., AA I or, equivalently,
A A1 3.18
A unitary matrix is the complex analogue of an orthogonal matrix. As such, we conclude that every
orthogonal matrix and every unitary matrix is diagonalisable (its rows and columns are linearly independent,
meaning that the matrix is non-singular; we can find its inverse). Conversely, we expect that orthogonal and
unitary matrices would diagonalise some matrices, being composed of linearly independent (normalised)
vectors, and hence non-singular.
Real symmetric matrices can be diagonalised by orthogonal matrices. As such, real symmetric matrices with
n distinct eigenvalues are orthogonally diagonalisable.
i.e., AA A A 3.19
In Text Questions
1. Show that sin mx and sin nx are orthogonal, m n , x .
Solution
1
sin mx sin nxdx 2 [cos( m n) x cos(m n) x]dx
The inner product is
1 1 1
sin( m n ) x sin( m n ) x
2 m n mn
=0
29
2/2 6 / 6 3 / 3
Q 0 6 /3 3 /3
2 /2 6 /6 3 / 3
2/2 0 2/2
QT 6 / 6 6 / 3 6 / 6
3 / 3 3/3 3 / 3
2/2 6 / 6 3 / 3 2 / 2 0 2/2
QQ 0
T
6 /3 3 / 3 6 / 6 6 / 3 6 / 6
2 / 2 6 / 6 3 / 3 3 / 3 3 /3 3 / 3
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
0 0 1
0 0 0
1 0 0
3. Diagonalise the symmetric matrix using the appropriate orthogonal matrix;
Solution
0 0 1
0 0 0
1 0 0
The characteristic equation is formed by
0 1
0 0 0
1 0
3 0
30
0 0 1 a1 a1 0
0 0 0 a 0 a 0
2 2
1 0 0 a3 a3 0
For = 0, the eigenvector is given by
or
a1 0
a 1
2
a 3 0
For 1 :
1 0 1 a1
0 1 0 a 2 0
1 0 1 a 3
or
a1 1
a 1 0
2 2
a 3 1
(Normalised)
For : 𝜆 = −1
1 0 1 a1
0 1 0 a 2 0
1 0 1 a 3
or
a1 1
a 1 0
2 2
a 3 1
(Normalised)
0 1 / 2 1/ 2
1 0 0
0 1 / 2 1 / 2
Q=
31
and
0 1 0
Q 1 / 2 0 1 / 2
T
1 / 2 0 1 / 2
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 / 2 1 / 2
1/ 2
0 1/ 2 0 0 0 1 0 0
1 / 2 0 1/
2 1 0 0 0 1 / 2 1 / 2
D Q Q
T
=
0 1 0 0 1 / 2 1/ 2
1/ 2
0 1 / 2 1 0 0
1 / 2 0 1 / 2 0 1 / 2 1 / 2
=
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
=
Note that you can only diagonalise a matrix the columns (or rows) of which are linearly independent. The
columns (as well as the rows) of an orthogonal matrix are linearly independent.
32
SAQ 3.1
(i) e x cosh x
(ii) x ln x
SAQ 3.2
a
a
(i) a
x 2 n 1 dx n 0,1, 2, ....
, (ii) a
x 2 n dx n 0,1, 2, ....
,
SAQ 3.3
3 x
If the matrix 1 2 is a proper orthogonal matrix, find x.
References/Further Readings
1. Mathematical Physics – Butkov, E.
2. Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering – Riley, K. F., Hobson, M. P. and Bence, S. J.
33
Study Session 4: OPERATORS AND RELATED TOPICS
Introduction
Operators are quite important in Quantum mechanics because every observable is represented by a
Hermitian operator. The eigenvalues of the operator are the possible values the physical observable can
take, and the expectation value of the observable in any particular state is the average value it takes in that
particular state. Commuting operators indicate that the corresponding physical observables can have the
same eigenstates, or equivalently, they can both be measured simultaneously with infinite accuracy. You
shall get to learn about all these in this Unit.
A linear map, or linear transformation or linear operator, is a function f : X Y between vector spaces
X and Y which preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication, i.e.,
Equivalently, .
f (ax1 bx 2 ) af ( x1 ) bf ( x 2 ) 4.3
d d d
( f1 ( x) f 2 ( x)) f 1 ( x) f 2 ( x)
dx dx dx 4.4
Let A be an operator and 𝜆 the associated eigenvalue corresponding to an eigenvector 𝜓. Then, we can
write
A 4.5
34
Frequently, the operator A is a matrix, and the eigenvector a column matrix. It follows that
( A I ) 0 4.6
Where I is the appropriate identity matrix, that is, a square matrix that has 1 along its main diagonal and
zero elsewhere.
For a non-trivial solution, we require that the determinant vanish, that is,
A I 0
4.7
Solving the resulting characteristic (or secular) equation, we obtain the possible values of, called the
eigenvalues. Then armed with the eigenvalues, we can then obtain the associated eigenfunctions.
3 2
Given the matrix 1 2 , find the corresponding eigenvectors and the eigenvalues.
Solution
u 3 2 u1 u
u 1 1
Let the eigenvector be u 2 , and the corresponding eigenvalue be . Then, 1 2 u 2 u 2
OR
3 2 1 0 u1
1 2 0 1 u 0
2
Which implies
3 2
0
1 2
OR 2 5 6 2 0
2 5 8 0
5 25 32 5 i 7
2 2 2
5 7
1 i
Let =2 2 . Then, the corresponding eigenvector can be found:
35
3 2 u1 5 7 u1
1 2 u 2 i 2 u
2 2
5 7
3u1 2u 2 i u1
2 2 (i)
5 7
u1 2u 2 i u 2
2 2
5 7 1 7
2u 2 3u1 i u1 i
2
u1
2 2 2
From (i),
11 7
i
2 2 2
Thus, choosing u1 = 1, we get u 2 =
1
Hence, an eigenfunction for the matrix is 1 i 7
v
v 1
Similarly, choosing v2 as the other eigenvector with a corresponding eigenvalue
v
2
5
i
7 v 1
2 2 , we can get the eigenvector v 2 .
Central to the theory of quantum mechanics is the idea of an operator (as we have seen earlier). We have
indeed come across some operators. Recall
Hˆ ( x) E ( x) 4.8
2 d 2 ( x)
Hˆ ( x) V ( x) ( x)
2m dx 2 4.9
36
We identify some other operators:
2 d 2
Tˆ
2m dx 2 4.10
d
pˆ i
dx 4.11
xˆ x 4.12
The expectation value of a quantity is the statistical predicted mean value of all measurements. The
n
1
x
xi
x x x
n
(statistical) average value of the numbers 1 , 2 , …, n is i 1 . However, if there is a
f x
distribution, such that there are i of the value i , i = 1, 2, …, n , then the average becomes
m
fx i i
1 n
x i 1
m
f i xi m
f
n i 1
fi i n
i 1 , since i 1 4.13
In the case of quantum mechanics, the average value, or expectation value, of an operator is
* ( x)() ( x)dx
4.14
x * ( x) x ( x)dx
4.15
37
2 2x
sin
Thus, if L L , with n = 2, and 0 x L ,
2x 2x
L
2
x sin x sin dx
L 0 L L 4.16
2x
L
2
x sin 2 dx
=L 0 L
2 L2 L
= L 4 2
The expectation value of the momentum for the same case above is
d
p
* ( x) i
( x)dx
dx 4.17
2x d 2x
2i L
sin sin dx
= L 0 L dx L
2i 2 4x
L
1
sin dx
= L L 0 2 L
2i L 4x
L
cos
L2
4 L 0
= =0
The energy expectation value of for the ground state of the simple harmonic oscillator:
1
dx 2
1 1
E 0* Hˆ 0 dx 0* 0 0 0 *
0 0 0
2 2
4.18
0
since is normalised.
* ˆ dx *dx
4.19
Thus, we see that for any eigenstate of an operator, the expectation value of the observable represented by
that operator is the eigenvalue. More generally, we would write the expectation value of an operator, A, in
a certain state , as
| A | .
Consider an operator P̂ that represents a physical observable of a system, e.g., energy or momentum.
ˆ
Suppose that the state has a particular value p of this observable, i.e., P p . Suppose further that
ˆ
the same state also has the value q of a second observable represented by the operator Q̂ , i.e., Q q
. Then p and q are called simultaneous eigenvalues. Then,
Similarly,
Since p and q are just real numbers, then qp pq . Thus, the condition for simultaneous eigenstates is
ˆˆ ˆˆ
that PQ QP or
Pˆ Qˆ Qˆ Pˆ 0 4.22
Pˆ Qˆ Qˆ Pˆ is said to be the commutator of P̂ and Q̂ and operators that satisfy the condition
Pˆ Qˆ Qˆ Pˆ 0 are said to commute. The commutator is normally written [ Pˆ , Qˆ ] .
When two operators commute, then they can have the same eigenstates as we have seen in this subsection
(notice that Q and P have the same eigenstate ).
39
In-text question
1 2 1 2i
2 1 1 1
1 3 2 1
1. The expectation value of a matrix operator, in state is
1 2 1 2i 2i 3 4 6i
2i 1 1 2 1 1 1 2i 1 1 4i 2 4i 2
1 3 2 1 2i 1 2i 1
ˆ
2. Show that [T , pˆ ] .
Solution
2 d 2 d d 2 d 2
i i
[Tˆ , pˆ ] = 2m dx 2 dx dx 2m dx 2
3 3
3 3
𝑖ℏ 𝑑 𝜓 − 𝑖ℏ 𝑑 𝜓 = 0
=
2𝑚 𝑑𝑥3 2𝑚 𝑑𝑥3
ˆ ˆ
3. Calculate [ x, p] .
Solution
d d
[ xˆ, pˆ ] x i i ( x )
dx dx
d d
ix i ix
= dx dx
= i
ˆ ˆ
Thus, we can write [ x, p] = i
Indeed, when two operators do not commute, it means that the two associated observables cannot be
measured with infinite accuracy simultaneously. Thus, an attempt to measure the momentum of a particle
x
with infinite accuracy will cause an infinite error in the position as is easily seen in the equation, p
40
. On the other hand, the momentum and the energy of such a system can be measured simultaneously with
infinite accuracy. Other non-commutating operators include Ê and tˆ , i.e., the energy operator and the
time operator.
Solution
cosh 2 x sin x
sinh 2 x sin x
It is obvious that the odd function is a product of an odd function and an even function. Likewise, the even
function is a product of two odd functions. We conclude, therefore, that the following rules apply:
The integral
𝑎
∫−𝑎 𝑓(𝑥)𝑑𝑥 = 0 If 𝑓(𝑥) is odd 4.26
𝑎 𝑎
∫−𝑎 𝑓(𝑥)𝑑𝑥 = 2 ∫0 𝑓(𝑥)𝑑𝑥 If 𝑓(𝑥) is even 4.27
Recall that the inner product in the space of twice integrable complex valued functions of two complex
b
( f , g ) f * ( x) g ( x)dx
valued functions f (x) and g (x) over the interval a x b is defined as a .
41
Two functions f (x) and g (x) are said to be orthogonal over an interval a x b if their inner
product is zero.
2
4. Construct an orthonormal set from the set 1, x, x ,... over the interval 1 x 1 . Thus, given the set
f1 , f 2 , f 3 ,..., we want to construct an orthogonal set 1 , 2 ,3 ,..., i.e.,
1
1
i ( x) j ( x)dx
= 0, if i j , then we normalise each member of the set.
(1 , 2 ) 0
1 1
1 x2
11 ( x ) dx
2
x 0
1 1
4.28
0
Thus, 2 x
Let
3 f 3 2 1 x 2 x
(1 , 3 ) 0 ( 2 , 3 ) 0
subject to and
or
1 1 1
x3 x 2 2x 2
x 1 2 x
1
3 1
2 1
3 0 =0 4.30
2
2 0
3 4.31
42
or
1
3 4.32
1 1
1
x (x 2 x )dx ( x 3 x 2 x)dx
1
Or
1 1 1
x4 x 3 x 2
0
4 1
3 1
2 1 4.33
1
2x 3
0
3 0
or
0 4.44
Putting the values of and from equations (2.24) and (2.26) into the expression
3 f 3 2 1 x 2 x , we arrive at
1
3 x 2
3 4.45
j
To normalise , we multiply the function by a normalisation constant, A , say, and invoke the relation
1
A 2 j ( x)dx 1
2
1 4.46
from which
2 A2 1
43
1
A
or 2
1
1
The normalised function 2 4.47
Similarly,
1
1
A 2 x 2 dx 1
3 1
1 1
2
x A
A 2
A2 2 1
3 1
3 3 3
3
A2
Thus, 2.
3
2 x
2
In like manner,
2
1 2 1 1
2 4 2 2 1
1 3
0 A x 3 x 9 dx
2
A x dx 2
=1
from which
1
x5 2x3 x
2A
2
1
5 9 90
or
1 2 1
2 A2 1
5 9 9
80 2
A 1
Therefore, 45
45 2 1
2 x
The normalised function 8 3
44
3. Suppose we are given two vectors u and v. The projection of v onto u is indeed,
Where is the angle between the two vectors, and û is the unit vector in the direction of u, and.
u uv
uˆ cos
u u v u v cos u v
Therefore, . But . So,
Hence,
uv u (u, v )
Pru v v
u u2 u
(u, v )
u
u v (u, u) 4.48
since (u, u) | u | .
2
u1 v1 4.49
Pru1 v 2
The projection of v 2 onto u1 is . This is the component of v 2 in the direction of u1 . The
component of
v 2 perpendicular (i.e., orthogonal) to u1 is (vector subtraction):
u 2 v 2 Pru1 v 2
4.50
v3 u
Similarly the components of perpendicular to both u1 and 2 is,
u 3 v 3 Pru1 v 3 Pru2 v 3
4.51
In general then,
n 1
u n v n Prui v n
i 1 4.52
uk
ek
|| u k || 4.53
Note that
Pru v projects vector v orthogonally onto vector u.
45
Summary of Study Session 4
In this study session, you have learnt:
1. The inner product of a pair orthogonal vectors is zero.
2. A basis that consists of orthogonal vectors only is an orthogonal basis.
3. With an orthogonal basis, we can define the probabilities of measurement.
4. The Gram- Schmidt orthonormalisation scheme can be used to create an orthogonal basis.
SAQ 4.1
y i
If the matrix i 2 is Hermitian, find the value of y.
SAQ 4.2
2 1 3
1, 0 , 7
0 1 1
Show that the set is a basis for the 3-dimensional Euclidean space. Show that the set
is not orthogonal. Hence, construct an orthogonal set from the vectors.
SAQ 4.3
Show that the set you obtained in SAQ 4.2 is not an orthonormal set, even though it is an orthogonal set.
Normalise each vector in the set. Hence, expand the normalised vector 1 2 1 / 6 in terms of this
basis. Calculate the probability that the system represented by the vector is in each of these states.
SAQ 4.4
0, 0 x a
V
, elsewhere
46
i 2 x 2 2 x 1 3 x
sin sin sin
2 a a 3a a 2a a
2 n x
sin
Given that the allowable wave functions are of the form a a , what is the probability of obtaining
each result?
SAQ 4.5
1 x A 2 x 3 3 x
( x) sin sin sin
5a a a a 6a a
47
Study Session 5 Inadequacies of Classical Mechanics and the Schrödinger
Equation
Introduction
If classical mechanics had no inadequacies, there would have been no need for a new theory. Up until the
turn of the century, it was thought that Newton’s laws could account for all physical phenomena,
irrespective of the size of the particle involved, and for any particle travelling at whatever speed.
By now, you are familiar with the basic ideas of classical mechanics, based on Newton’s laws of motion. It
would appear that once you know the equation of motion of a body, you can simultaneously and accurately
predict its position and linear momentum at any other time. Moreover, you would expect that an electron
confined within the walls of a finite potential well, provided the energy is less than the height of the well,
and would have no effect outside the borders of the well. Of course, the harmonic oscillator you came
across could have zero energy.
In this unit, you will get to know that matter behaves like wave or like a particle; that the highest velocity
with which photoelectrons emitted are from a photometal is independent of the intensity of the incident
radiation.
Everybody at a temperature higher than absolute zero radiates energy as the internal energy (thermal) is
converted to electromagnetic radiation. The spectrum of frequencies emitted by the body depends on its
temperature. Thus, at low energies, lower frequencies (or longer wavelengths) are predominant. At higher
temperatures, the higher frequencies (shorter wavelengths) are more prominent. It would be seen that the
peak of the spectrum of radiation moves towards the higher frequencies as the temperature of the body
increases. A blackbody is the perfect absorber and emitter of radiation. An example of a blackbody would
be a tiny hole in a heated cavity. Radiation falling on such a hole would be bounced up and down inside the
cavity, due to reflection, until all the radiation is absorbed. Before the time of Planck, Stefan and
Boltzmann came up with a formula for finding the total radiant energy emitted by a blackbody per unit
surface area per unit time, as
j* T 4 5.1
temperature of the body. With this law, Stefan was able to determine the temperature of the sun.
48
Rayleigh and Jeans predicted, based on the principle of equipartition of energy that the radiation emitted by
a blackbody per unit time, per unit area is given as
8 v 2 kT
u
c3 5.2
Where k is the Boltzmann constant, v is the frequency of the radiation and T is the temperature of the
body. However, neither the Stefan-Boltzmann nor the Rayleigh-Jeans formula could give the true picture
(experimental); that is, neither fitted the observed spectrum of radiation. The former agreed with
observation at high frequencies while the latter was fairly good for low frequencies.
By making the assumption that radiant energy could only be emitted or absorbed in quanta (or little packets
of energy), Planck arrived at the formula
8h v3
u
c 3 e hv / KT 1 5.3
This formula agrees with observation at all frequencies. Fig. 1 shows the spectrum for three temperatures:
2000 K, 3000 K and 4000 K. The figure also shows that the classical theory fits observation only at low
frequencies (long wavelength range).
7.E-16
6.E-16
5.E-16
Radiant energy (J)
2000 K
4.E-16
3000 K
4000 K
3.E-16
Classical
2.E-16
1.E-16
0.E+00
0.E+00 5.E-06 1.E-05 2.E-05
Wavelength (m)
Fig. 5.1: The spectrum of radiation for 2000, 3000 and 4000 K, and the classical result.
49
5.3 Photoelectric effect
Photoelectric effect is the phenomenon in which electrons are emitted from matter due to irradiation by
electromagnetic waves of suitable frequency. Classical mechanics predicts that the higher the intensity of
the incident wave, the higher the velocity of the emitted electron. Moreover, it expects any frequency of
light to emit electrons. This was, however, not observed in nature. To start with, the electrons were never
emitted unless the frequency of the incident wave was a certain value. In other words, there is a threshold
below which the incident radiation would not emit any electrons.
Einstein assumed that the incident radiation consisted of little packets of energy, quanta of light, called
photons, each of energy, 𝐸 = ℎ𝑓 where h is the Planck’s constant and v is the frequency of the incident
radiation. The assumption was that an electron would either absorb a photon or not. In the event that the
electron absorbs this energy, then, part of the energy would be used in overcoming the work function of the
metal, that is, the energy binding the electron to the metal. The excess energy would then be available for
the electron to move away from the metal. In other words, if the energy of the photon is just enough to
overcome the work function, the electron would be emitted, but would not have enough energy to leave the
surface of the metal. Thus, the formula guiding photoelectric effect is
1
E hf K max 2
mvmax
2 5.4
K max
is the maximum kinetic energy of an emitted electron. It follows that the maximum velocity an
emitted electron can have is
It is clear from equation 1.5, that for E hf less than the work function, no electron is emitted, meaning
that, since h is a constant, if the frequency, f, is less than a threshold, no electron is emitted. Thus, the
maximum kinetic energy a photon can have, hf , is independent of the intensity of the radiation, being
a function only of the frequency, provided the metal remains the same (i.e., the work function remains
hf
constant).We can also write the work function as 0 , where f0
is the threshold frequency, below
which no electron will be emitted. We can therefore now writ
v 2h( f f 0 )
5.6
50
1 2
mvmax eV0
2 5.7
Where 𝑒 is the charge on the electron and 𝑉0 is the stopping potential, since the potential energy just
balances the kinetic energy. Solving for, 𝑉0
2
mvmax
V0
2e 5.8
Let a photon with wavelength collide with an electron at rest. After the collision, the photon is scattered
in direction relative to its initial direction. The electron is also scattered at an angle with respect to the
reference direction as shown in Fig. … We shall apply relativistic conditions, meaning that the speeds
involved are large enough to be considered relativistic.
Conservation of energy
E Ee E ' Ee'
5.9
hv me c 2 hv' pe c 2 (me c 2 ) 2
2
5.10
Ee' pe c 2 (me c 2 ) 2
2 2
5.11
51
Conservation of linear momentum
pe 0
But . Hence,
p p'p e '
5.13
Hence,
p e ' p p'
5.17
Setting pc hv
(hv me c 2 hv' ) 2 me c 4
= (hv) (hv' ) 2(hv)( hv' ) cos
2 2 2
hvv' me c
Dividing through by ,
c c h
(1 cos )
v v ' me c 5.23
h
' (1 cos )
me c 5.24
Rutherford tried to explain the structure of the atom by proposing a central nucleus, with the electrons
moving in orbits round the nucleus. However, quite a number of things were not right with his model. For
instance, you would have been taught before now, that an accelerating charge would radiate energy.
Remember that a body on curvilinear motion is accelerating even if the magnitude of the velocity remains
constant (centripetal acceleration). As such, you would expect an electron moving round the nucleus to
lose energy and subsequently fall into the massive nucleus. We therefore would have expected a
continuous spectrum of energy as against the line spectra obtained in reality. Bohr attempted to solve this
problem by making some postulates:
(i) An electron can only orbit the nucleus at certain radii, such that the condition mvr n ,
where all symbols have their usual meanings. Thus, the radii are quantised; not just any radius
would do. While in such an orbit, the electron would not radiate energy.
(ii) Electrons can make a transition from one allowable orbit (or correspondingly, energy level) to
another by absorbing or emitting the difference in energy, as the case may be. That is, the
energy difference is
E f E i h
Taking into consideration the Coulombic force between the proton and the electron in the hydrogen atom,
Bohr arrived at the allowable radii of the form,
rn Cn 2
53
Where C is a constant. Correspondingly, the energy levels are also of the form
D
En
n2
Where D is a constant.
Clearly, you can see again the fact that quantisation enters into the picture.
Even though Bohr’s theory would also not meet the ultimate needs of physics, it afforded a bridge from
classical mechanics to quantum mechanics. Now you know that the electron in the atom is actually not to
be seen as a particle anymore, as it is as if a part of it resides in every region in the atom, aside the nucleus.
So, we see the electron as a cloud of sorts, and apply the laws of statistics in its distribution, especially in
view of the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle which makes it impossible to simultaneously predict
accurately the position and the momentum of a partic5.6 Wave-particle duality
So far, we have considered radiant energy and photons as being quantised. On the other hand, according to
de-Broglie (1924), matter has a wave nature, with the wavelength given by
h p 5.25
where h is the Planck’s constant, p is the linear momentum of the photon and the associated
wavelength.
This formula was later confirmed experimentally via electron diffraction. Other phenomena that support
the wave nature of light include refraction, diffraction and interference.
From the foregoing, it is quite clear that matter behaves as if composed of particles or as a wave, hence the
term wave-particle duality.
Classical physics claims to know the future state of any particle, provided the position and the momentum
are known at any point. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle excludes the possibility of simultaneously
measuring the position and the linear momentum of any object with infinite accuracy. Indeed, any attempt
to measure one of the quantities with infinite accuracy leads to infinite uncertainty in the other. Indeed, if
the uncertainty in position x and that of the linear momentum of the particle is p , then,
xp
2
Thus, our whole world of classical mechanics seems to have melted away. However, classical mechanics
has been tested and trusted for so long. Why does it now seem to fail? It is because we have been dealing
with matter on the large scale. Quantum mechanics makes the difference when we have to deal with small
objects, for example on the scale of atoms. Indeed, quantum mechanics has to agree with classical physics
in certain limits, in conformity with the correspondence principle.
54
In-text question
Q. Find the change in wavelength if a photon is scattered at an angle of 23 0 after its collision with
an electron initially at rest.
Solution
The change in wavelength is
h 6.626 10 34
' (1 cos ) 31
(1 cos 230 ) 1.9294 10 13 m
me c 9.1 10 3 10 8
According to Classical electromagnetism, the wavelength of the scattered rays should remain the same, but
this did not agree with experiments. The latter found that the wavelengths of the scattered rays were greater
than the initial wavelength as borne out by equation 1.24.
Thus, for Compton Effect to be explained, we have to make recourse to radiation consisting of particles
that have energy and momentum.
Now that you have completed this study session, you can assess how well you have achieved its
learning outcomes by answering the following questions. Write your answers in your Study Diary
and discuss them with your Tutor at the next Study Support Meeting.
55
SAQ 5.1
Find the maximum kinetic energy with which an electron is emitted from a metal of work function
3.2 10 39 J when a radiation of energy E = 3.313 10 39 J falls on it, given that the work function is
3.2 10 39 J .
SAQ 5.2
What value does Rayleigh-Jeans formula predict for the radiation of frequency 6 10 Hz emitted by a
13
blackbody per unit time, per unit area at 2500 0K. Compare this value with that predicted by Planck.
REFERENCES/FURTHER READINGS
56
Study Session 6 THE SCHROEDINGER EQUATION
Introduction
The fact that matter behaves like a wave implies that we would need an equation or a set of equations to
describe the wave behaviour of matter. As such, we would expect to have an equation describing the wave
nature of the electron. Likewise, the quantum-mechanical treatment of the harmonic oscillator would
involve an equation describing the wave behaviour of the oscillator. In this unit, we shall derive the
appropriate differential equations for the wave function, and consequently, describe the probability with
which the particle would be found at different points within the appropriate region of confinement, and
possibly beyond.
6.1 Objectives
We are quite aware that you know that the total mechanical energy of a body is the sum of the kinetic
energy T and the potential energy V. Of course, you also remember that the kinetic energy of a body of
mass m is
1 2 1 m2v 2 p2
mv
2 2 m 2m 6.1
Then, the sum of its kinetic and potential energies, that is, the total mechanical energy is
p2
E T V V
2m 6.2
57
You surely recall that we can write p k and E . Substituting these into equation (6.2) give
2k 2
V
2m 6.3
2k 2
2m 6.4
Let us try
( x, t ) Ae i ( kx t )
Then,
2
( x, t ) k 2 Ae i ( kx t ) k 2 ( x, t )
x 2
( x, t ) i Ae i ( kx t ) i ( x, t )
t
2
Multiplying the first equation by 2m and the second by i gives
2
( x, t ) i ( x, t )
2m x 2
t
2
( x, t ) V ( x, t )( x, t ) i ( x, t )
2m x 2
t 6.5
2
( x, t ) V ( x) ( x, t ) i ( x, t )
2m x 2
t 6.6
Let
( x, t ) ( x) (t )
58
You would recognise this equation as showing that ( x, t ) is variable separable, that is, we can write it as
a product of a function of x only, multiplied by a function of t only.
2
[ ( x) (t )] V ( x)[ ( x) (t )] i [ ( x) (t )]
2m x 2
t 6.7
2 d d
(t ) 2
( x) V ( x) ( x) (t ) i ( x) (t )
2m dx dt 6.8
1 2 d 1 d
( x) V ( x) i (t )
( x) 2m dx 2
(t ) dt 6.9
Notice that we could carry out this algebra only because the potential is a function of x alone. That is, the
potential is time-independent. You would also observe that the partial differentials have become ordinary
differentials since they now apply to a function of a single variable in each case. In equation 2.9, a function
only of x is equated to a function only of t. This means that they must be separately equal to a constant. We
know from the left part of equation 2.9, that the constant is the kinetic energy of the particle, E. Then,
1 d
i (t )
(t ) dt = E 6.10
d E iE
(t ) dt dt
(t ) i 6.11
Integrating,
iE
ln (t ) tc
6.12
iE
(t ) exp t c
De iEt / 6.13
59
Where D e
c
But we can set D equal to unity as we shall be writing the wave function as ( x ) (t ) , and in any case, the
wave function has not been normalised.
(t ) e iEt / 6.14
2 d
( x) V ( x) ( x) E
2m dx 2 6.15
Rearranging,
d 2m
2
( x) 2 [ E V ( x)] ( x) 0
dx 6.16
This is the time-independent Schrödinger equation, applicable when the total (mechanical) energy of a
system is constant. We would not be able to solve equation 2.16 until we know the specific form of the
function 𝑉(𝑥).
We conclude that in the case where the potential is independent of the time,
1. Generally, the solution ( x, t ) of this equation is generally a complex function. You already know that
the magnitude of a complex function might not make any sense physically. But the square of the magnitude
(the intensity) certainly does, being always a positive real number. Indeed, it is a measure of the probability
( x, t )
2
of the particle being described arriving somewhere. is, therefore, a probability density. Of
( x, t ) dx
2
course, this implies that, is the probability of finding the particle between x and x dx at
time t. ( x, t ) is the probability amplitude and is the wave function. This is the function that describes the
behaviour of a particle as a function of x and t . This is the Born interpretation of .
2. The solutions for equation 2.16 for a given functions 𝑉(𝑥) are possible for many solutions, each with a
corresponding energy E . This ensures that only certain values of E are allowed (energy quantisation).
60
( x, t ) ( x)e iEt /
2
( x, t ) ( x ) e iEt /
2
Then, since = 1 and the probability of finding the particle at any point is
independent of time. Such a state is called a stationary state.
(a) Single valued (b) continuous; (c) smoothly varying; and (d) tend to zero as
x .
5. The probability of finding the particle along the chosen 1-dimension is 1, Hence,
( x) dx
2
= 1. 6.18
This is the normalisation condition, and it expresses the certainty (probability 1) of finding the particle
anywhere in the range x
In-text question
Q: Which of the following functions would you recommend as a possible eigenfunction in quantum
mechanics?
(i) ( x) e ( x) xe2 x
x2
(ii) ( x) 2 x (iii)
2
A:
(i) This is a bell-shaped function tends to zero as x tends to + infinity and – infinity. In addition, it
is twice differentiable, continuous, and normalisable.
(ii) The function is not normalisable even though it is continuous. This is because it continues to
grow as | x | becomes large.
(iii) This is also a valid function. As | x | grows, the exponential function tames the function,
preventing from tending to infinity. It is continuous and twice differentiable
61
3. The square of the amplitude of the solution of the Schrödinger equation gives the probability density.
4. The normalisation condition requires that the integral of the probability density over the whole of the
relevant range equals unity.
SAQ 6.1
By solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a free particle (V = 0), find the condition
SAQ 6.2
2 2 2
2 2 2
x y z
=0
SAQ 6.3
𝑛
What would the potential function be if 𝜓(𝑥) = (𝑥𝑥 ) 𝑒−2𝑥⁄𝑥0 is an eigenfunction of the Schrödinger
0
References/Further Readings
1. Quantum Mechanics demystified - David McMahon.
2. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics – David J. Griffiths.
3. Quantum Physics – Stephen Gasiorowicz.
62
Study Session 7 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
Introduction
So far, in the first units of this module, we have derived the Schrödinger equation, and have also
interpreted its solution. In this unit you shall learn the postulates of quantum mechanics. You shall also
learn how to expand a given wave function in terms of a complete set of orthonormal eigenstates, which
are the states in which the system can possibly exist, recover the coefficient of each eigenstate in the
expansion, and then determine the probability that it is indeed in any given state. It is necessary to know
what value you should expect when you carry out a measurement of a physical observable. This you shall
learn with appropriate examples in this Unit as well. You shall also get to know in what limit quantum
mechanics must agree with classical mechanics through the knowledge of the Correspondence Principle.
1. Expand a given wave function as a linear combination of the possible orthonormal eigenstates
2. Recover the coefficient of each eigenstate in the expansion
3. Calculate the probability that the system is in any given eigenstate
4. Find the (statistical) expectation value of a physical observable in any
given eigenstate of the system
5. Learn the limit in which quantum mechanics should conform to classical mechanics
(1) There exists a function, called state ( x, t ) . This gives the state of the system. It contains all that are
relevant mechanically in the system. In other words, it gives the spatial and temporal (space and time)
evolution of the quantum-mechanical particle.
is single-valued in x , differentiable in x and t ; ( x, t ) is square integrable in x .
(2) To every measurement (of an attribute of a system) there is a linear self-adjoint (Hermitian)
operator, called an observable, A, operating on the wave function. E.g., A . That is, the operator
acting on a state function produces a state function . If is a multiple of , say
, then,
A . Then is an eigenvector and an eigenvalue of A. The eigenvalues { } are the values
63
physically obtainable in measuring the attribute that has A as its observable. We therefore expect the ’s to
be real. Hermitian operators are associated with real observables because they need to have real
eigenvalues (possible measurements).
For example, the operator corresponding to the energy of a system is the Hamiltonian, which is
2 d 2
V ( x, t )
written as 2m dx 2 . There are two operators involved, and you would remember that
in Classical Mechanics, the two parts of the Hamiltonian are the kinetic energy and the potential
2 d 2
energy. Clearly, you can see that the kinetic energy operator in Quantum Mechanics is 2m dx 2 ,
and the potential energy operator is V ( x, t ) . But do you also remember that classically we write
p2
the kinetic energy as 2m ? Can you then see that in Quantum Mechanics, comparing the two
d
p i
expressions, we must write dx . Square this expression and confirm that indeed it gives
d2
2
you dx 2 . Applying the energy operator to the state function, we get,
2 d 2
2
V ( x, t ) ( x, t ) E( x, t )
2m dx (7.1)
E
Depending on the potential V ( x, t ) , we could get the possible values of the energy, i , of the
particle. This is the idea behind quantisation.
{ j }
(3) Let form a basis of H . Then,
n
c j j
j 1
c j ( j , )
, with (7.2)
There are many possible states for a quantum-mechanical system, usually infinite in number with n in
equation 3.2 tending to infinity. Hence, the wave function ( x, t ) is a linear combination of all these
possible states. This means the system described by can be found in any of the possible states j . We
ci (i , )
can recover the coefficient of each of the possible states using equation . Once we have done
ci
that, that is, we have found , we could find the probability that the system is in that particular state (i),
| ci | 2
{ j }nj1
, provided the wave function is normalized, and the set is an orthonormal set. Refer to
Unit …
64
(4) The expectation value of any property w(x) can be found by obtaining the expectation value of the
corresponding operator with respect to the wave function.
w * ( x) wˆ ( x) dx
(5) Reduction Doctrine: If we make a measurement in state and obtain k out of all the possible
{ j }nj1 j
states , then if immediately after that measurement we make another, we obtain with
| ck | 2
probability = 1, i.e., the process of measurement reduces to k .
(6) The time evolution of the wave function is given by the equation
i ( x, t ) H ( x, t )
t (7.3)
In-text question
2
( x, t 0)
x
1. An electron whose normalized state function at time t = 0 is found to be L2 is
0, 0 x L
V ( x)
confined within the infinite time-independent potential well given by , elsewhere
2 n x
n ( x) sin
The allowed eigenstates are L L for 0 x L ; n = 1, 2, 3, … The coefficient, c m , of
8 2
2 2
m in the expansion in the normalised (x) is L m .
(ii)What is the expectation value of the displacement and the linear momentum in state n = 3?
2 2 2
2
(iii)The energy is measured and found to be ma . What is the state of the system immediately after
measurement?
(vi)Time evolution
65
Solution
(i) The probability that the electron is in state m = 3:
8 2
cm 2 2
L m
8 2 32
c3 2 2
L 3 81L 4
32
2
The probability that the electron is in state m = 3 is 3 = 81L
|c | 4
(ii) The expectation value of the displacement in state m = 3 is (since the operator for x is x̂ = x):
x 3 * ( x) x3 ( x)dx
In this case,
n is non-zero only between 0 and L . Hence, the integral becomes
*
L 2 3 x 2 3 x
x
L sin L
x sin dx
0
L L
2 L 3 x
= L
0
x sin 2
L
dx
2 L 1 3 x
L 0
x 1 cos 2
2 L
dx
(since
1
sin 2 [1 cos 2 ]
2
= )
1 L 6 x
L 0
x x cos
L
dx
=
1 L
= L
0 xdx (the second integral is zero; can you show it?)
L
1 x2 L2 L
L 2 2L 2
= 0
d
pˆ i
The expectation value of the linear momentum in state m = 3 is (since the operator for p is dx ):
d
x 3 * ( x) i 3 ( x)dx
dx
66
In this case,
n is non-zero only between 0 and L . Hence, the integral becomes
*
L 2 3 x d 2 3 x
p
L sin
i sin dx
0
L dx L L
2 L 3 x 3 3 x
*
L 0
(i) sin cos dx
= L L L
6 L 3 x 3 x
=
i
L2 0
sin
L
cos
L
dx
6 L 1 3 x
i cos 2 1
dx sin cos cos 2
= L2 0 2 L (since 2 )
3 L 6 x
i
L2 0
cos
L
dx
=
L
3 L 6 x
i 2 sin 0
L 6 x L 0
=
(iii)The measured energy is equivalent to the energy state n = 2, since we can write it as
2 2 2 2 n 2 2 2
2ma 2 2ma 2 . Therefore, from the reduction principle, immediately after the measurement,
the electron will be found with probability 1 in the state n = 2, that is with eigenfunction
2 2 x
2 sin
L L .
2 j x
( x,0) c j sin
j 1 L L
At time t 0 ,
2 j x iEn t /
( x, t ) c j (0) sin e
j 1 L L
67
velocities involved are large, must conform to Newtonian mechanics when the velocities involved are
small day to day values. As an instance of this law, we consider the Hydrogen atom as treated by Bohr.
The frequency of the radiation emitted or absorbed in a transition between states n and n' is,
1 1
E nn' RE 2 2
n' n (7.4)
Now, classical mechanics predicts a continuous spectrum, while Bohr’s theory gives rise to discrete lines.
Let us take n' as being equal to n 1. Then,
1 1
Enn' RE 2
(n 1) n RE [(n 1) 2 n 2 ]
2
= (7.5)
Hence,
2
RE
E nn' n3 (7.7)
This tends to zero as n tends to infinity. We conclude therefore, that as n tends to infinity, the spectrum
becomes continuous, as predicted by classical mechanics.
68
Self- Assessment Questions for Study Session 7
Now that you have completed this study session, you can assess how well you have achieved its
learning outcomes by answering the following questions. Write your answers in your Study Diary
and discuss them with your Tutor at the next Study Support Meeting.
SAQ 7.1
0, 0 x L / 2
V ( x)
, elsewhere
SAQ 7.2
SAQ 7.3
A particle is confined within a one-dimensional region 0 x L . At time t = 0, its wave function is given
x x
A1 cos sin L
as L .
(iii) Find the average energy of the system at time t = 0 and at an arbitrary time 𝑡0.
(iv) Find the average energy of the particle.
(v) Write the expression for the probability that the particle is found within 0 x L / 2 ?
69
SAQ 7.4
0, 0 x a
V
, elsewhere
i 2 x 2 3 x 2 3 x
sin sin sin
2 a a 3a a 16a a
(a) If the energy is measured, what are the possible results and what is the probability of obtaining
each result?
(b) What is the most probable energy for this particle?
(c) What is the average energy of the particle?
References/Further Readings
1. Quantum Mechanics demystified - David McMahon.
70
Study Session 8 Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation in One Dimension I
Introduction
In Study session 2, we were able to review the inadequacies of classical mechanics, and found it necessary
to evolve a wave description of a particle. In Study session 2, we derived the differential equation that
describes the wave function associated with a particle. We have now been provided the tool needed to
describe the quantum-mechanical dynamics of a particle. We shall take a look at the particle in different
types of wells, and then compare our results with those of classical mechanics.
You would recall that a body in simple harmonic motion bounces back and forth between the two points
where the total mechanical energy, E, of the body is equal to the potential energy. As the kinetic energy
becomes zero, the body must turn back. In just the same way, a quantum-mechanical oscillator is a particle
inside an infinite potential well. You shall see that indeed, the solutions will be sinusoidal, just the way it is
with a harmonic oscillator. Such a state is an example of a bound state. More specifically, we shall say a
system is in a bound state if, E V () . As such the wave function involved must die at infinity, that is,
( x) 0 as x . E V () or/and E V () is called a scattering state. Another way of
seeing a bound state is to say that the particle is subjected to an attracting potential.
71
8.2 Particle in an infinite potential well
∞ ∞
x=0 x=L
Fig. 8.1: The infinite square well potential confining a particle to a region of width L
Inside the well, the potential is zero. Outside the well, the potential is infinite. We expect that the wave
function outside the well will be zero.
2 2m
( E V ) 0
x 2 2 .
When V = 0,
d 2 2m
E 0
dx 2 (8.1)
d 2
2
k 2 0
dx (8.2)
Where 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 are constants to be determined, subject to the boundary conditions, and i 1 . (In the
case of the infinite potential well, the condition of continuity of the first differential is redundant, and you
should know why)
Since
(i) (x ) = 0 for x 0
72
(0) c1e ik 0 c2 e ik 0
=0
c1 c2 0 c1 c2 c
Where A 2ic .
(ii) (x ) = 0 for x L
Asin kL 0 kL n , where n = 0, 1, 2 …
n
kn
It follows that the values of k are quantised, such that L .
2
2kn n2h2
En
Thus, the corresponding energy 2m 8mL2 , and the wave function corresponding to this energy
nx
n ( x) An sin
is L .
n=1
Fig. 8.2: The lowest three wave functions (for n = 1, 2 and 3) in the infinite square well potential.
73
Notice that the energy increases with n as n , i.e., for n = 1, 2, 3, …, E = E1 , 4E1 , 9E1 , …
2
E1 is the energy of the ground state ( n = 1) and E2 4E1 is the energy of the first excited state ( n 2 ).
Fig. 8.3: The probability of finding a particle at different values of x for the energy levels n
= 1, 2 and 3 in the infinite square well potential.
An
, called the normalisation constant is obtained by applying the normalisation condition:
( x) dx 1
2
(8.4)
i.e.
74
nx
L
dx 1
2
An sin 2
0 L (8.5)
1
An 1
2
or 2 ,
2
An
L.
2 nx
n ( x) sin
L L for 0 x L ; n = 1, 2, 3, … (8.6)
You can now see that the Eigen states we dealt with so extensively in study session 2 are the Eigen states
allowable inside an infinite potential well.
You would also notice that very much like harmonic oscillation in the classical case, the allowable
wavefunctions are sinusoidal.
In the last section, we dealt with the case of an infinite potential well, with the resulting wave functions
being zero at the boundaries. In the case of a finite potential well, the wave functions “spill over” into the
region outside the potential well. Let us see how.
x L / 2 x L/2
When𝐸 < 𝑉0, a particle in the potential is said to be bound. Compared to the infinite potential well, it is
more convenient to take the centre of the well as 𝑥 = 0.
75
Solutions:
d 2 II 2mE
2 II 0
, which can be written (where k 2mE / ) as
2 2 2
Region II: dx
d 2 II
2
k 2 II 0
dx
(8.10)
d 2 I 2m(V0 E )
2
I 0 2 2m(V0 E ) / 2
Region I: dx 2 , which can be written (where
as
d 2 I
2
2 I 0
dx (8.12)
I Cex (8.14)
d 2 III 2m(V0 E )
2
III 0
Region III: dx 2 , which can be written as
d 2 III
2 III 0
dx 2 (8.15)
76
III Cex (why C again?) (8.17)
kL
B cos Ce L / 2
2 (8.18)
and
kL
kB sin Ce L / 2
2 (8.19)
kL
tan
2 k (8.20)
This is the equation that determines the values of k and hence the energy E for even parity solutions.
77
At x L / 2 , both and ' ' are continuous. Thus, at x L / 2 , we have
kL
A sin Ce L / 2
2 (8.21)
and
kL
kAcos Ce L / 2
2 (8.22)
kL
cot
2 k (8.23)
This is the equation that determines the values of k and hence the energy E for odd parity solutions.
In Text Question
Let the total wave function of the particle in the potential well above be Dx . Where D is a
normalization constant. Find the probability that the particle is in state 0, 1, 2 and 5.
Solutions
The first thing to do is to normalise the wave functions 𝜓𝑛(𝑥), which we have done. Next, we normalise
.
L
x2 L2
L
Dxdx D D 1
0 2 0 2
2
D
Therefore, L2 , implying that
2
( x) x
L2
Then, the total wave function can be expanded as a linear combination of the set of wave functions
n (x) ,
( x) c
n 1
n n ( x)
as
78
2 nx 2
c n ( n , ) cos , x
L L L2
The coefficient
nx
L
2 2
x cos dx
= L L2 0 L
Integrating by parts,
2 2 L nx nx
L
L
L
cn x sin sin dx
L L2 n L 0 0 n L
nx
L
2 2 L2
2 2 2 cos
L L n L 0
=
8
2 2 cos n cos 0
L n
1
8 1
2 2 1 (1) n
L n
= =
8 2
2 2
= L n for n odd and 0 for n even
Could you comment on this result? The probability of finding the particle in a particular eigenstate reduces
as n increases. Thus, it is more likely that you find the particle in a lower eigenstate than in a higher one.
You may also compare this expression with that of the hydrogen atom according to Bohr. Can you write an
expression for the probability of finding the particle in state n?
79
Self- Assessment Questions for Study Session 8
Now that you have completed this study session, you can assess how well you have achieved its
learning outcomes by answering the following questions. Write your answers in your Study Diary
and discuss them with your Tutor at the next Study Support Meeting.
SAQ 8.1
What are the allowable Eigen functions and energy eigenvalues of the infinite potential well?
0, L x L
V ( x)
, elsewhere
References/Further Readings
80
Study Session 9 SCATTERING STATE
Introduction
In study session 8, we discussed the infinite and the finite potential wells. In this Unit, we shall consider
two cases: the potential step and the potential barrier for the case where the energy of the particle is less
than the potential and when it is higher. These are the scattering cases, as we have mentioned in Unit 1.
Rather than bound states, we are concerned in these cases with reflection and transmission coefficients. Yet
again, we shall compare our results with those of the equivalent classical case.
………………………..
E V0
x=0
0, x 0
V
V0 , x 0
Let us consider the two possibilities: 𝐸 > 𝑉0 and 𝐸 < 𝑉0. The former is such that the energy of the
incident particle is higher than the potential step. Classically, the particle will pass the potential step and
move on to the right, past x = 0. In the case 𝐸 < 𝑉0, classical mechanics predicts that the particle will be
reflected to the left at 𝑥 = 0. We now take these cases one at a time.
81
Case 1: 𝐸 > 𝑉0
d 2 L 2mE
2 L 0
dx 2 , the subscript L denoting the region to the left of x = 0.
Where
2mE
k
2 9.2
d 2 R 2m( E V0 )
R 0
dx 2 2
9.3
x Ce i x De i x 9.4
Where
2m( E V0 )
2 9.5
From our knowledge of classical mechanics, we would expect perfect reflection at the barrier. We can take
i x
the incident wave as being Ae for x 0 from the left and De for x 0 from the right, since the
ikx
latter originated from the potential step and is traveling to the left. Experimentally, we should have a
source to only one side of the step. If we assume that the incident wave is from the left, then we have to set
ikx i x
D = 0. In that case, Be is the wave reflected at x = 0 and Ce is the wave transmitted at x = 0. We can
now write the following:
82
inc Aeikx 9.6
ref Be ikx
9.7
Now we match these solutions at x = 0, that is, both and ' are continuous at this point.
k ( A B) C
9.11
k ( A B) ( A B) 9.12
Hence,
kA kB A B 9.13
or
(k ) A (k ) B 9.14
k
B A
We conclude, therefore, that k 9.15
83
and
k kA A kA A 2k
C A A A
k k k 9.16
Since the flux intensity is proportional to the product of the velocity and the probability, we make the
following identification:
v1Pinc
Incident flux is proportional to
v1 Pref
Reflected flux is proportional to
v2 Ptrans
Transmitted flux is proportional to
Pinc inc
*
inc ( Aeikx ) * ( Aeikx ) A * e ikx Aeikx | A |2
9.17
Similarly,
Pref | B |2
9.18
and
Ptrans | C |2
9.19
v2 4k 2
T
v1 (k ) 2
Hence, 9.21
k
2
| A|
2
2
reflected flux v1Pref | B | k
R
incident flux v1Pinc | A |2 | A |2
9.22
or
84
(k ) 2
R
(k ) 2 9.23
1 2
2m mv1
2mE 2 mv
k 2
2
1
9.24
1 2
2m v2
2m( E V0 ) mv
2 2
2 2
9.25
k v1
v2 9.26
Adding,
(k )2 v2 4k 2 (k )2 4k 2 (k ) 2 4k
R T
(k ) 2
v1 (k ) 2
(k ) 2
k (k ) 2
(k ) (k ) 2
2
E V0
Note: Since k , R 0 . This implies that even particles with could be reflected. Classical
mechanics predicts that as the particles with energy 𝐸 > 𝑉0cross the point x 0 into a region of finite
V
potential 0 , no particle should be reflected. They should only be slowed down, as part of their energy has
been used to overcome the potential. This indeed is why your simple pendulum slows down as it
approaches a region where 𝐸 = 𝑉0 ., and then changes direction as soon as it gets to the point 𝐸 = 𝑉0..
That is why it oscillates between the two positions where 𝐸 = 𝑉0. Thus in classical mechanics no particle
85
Case 2: 𝐸 < 𝑉0.
d 2 L 2mE
2 L 0
dx 2 9.28
Where
2mE
k
2 9.30
d 2 R 2m(V0 E )
R 0
dx 2 2
9.31
x Ce x De x 9.32
Where
2m(V0 E )
2 9.33
In this case, we have to set C 0 as we do not want solutions that grow exponentially as they cannot be
normalized.
In this case,
inc Aeikx
9.34
86
ref Be ikx
9.35
trans De x 9.36
Now we match these solutions at x = 0, that is, both and ' are continuous at this point.
k ( A B) i D (as 1/ i i ) 9.39
k ( A B) i ( A B) 9.40
Hence,
kA kB i A i B 9.41
or
(k i ) A (k i ) B 9.42
k i
B A
k i 9.43
and
k i kA i A kA i A 2k
D A A A
k i k i k i 9.44
Since the flux intensity is proportional to the product of the velocity and the probability, we make the
following identification:
Pinc | A |2
9.45
87
Pref | B |2
9.46
and
Ptrans | D |2 9.47
or
| k i |2 (k i ) * (k i ) (k i )( k i )
R 1
| k i |2 =
(k i ) * (k i ) (k i )( k i )
9.49
Thus, all the incident particles are reflected. However, the probability of finding the particle at a point a
𝑥 > 0 is
| De x |2 | D |2 e2 x 9.50
This is finite for finite x. In the classical situation, the particles are definitely reflected at 𝑥 = 0. That is
also what ‘common sense’ would predict. But the fact that particles behave also like waves necessitates
that ‘some of the wave’ would be found beyond 𝑥 = 0 .However, note that the probability decays
exponentially, so that the probability is finite only if the distance 𝑥 > 0. If 𝑉0 ≫ 𝐸, then 𝛽 is very large,
meaning that the decay of the probability will be much faster. In the extreme, limiting, case, where 𝑉0 tends
to infinity, there is perfect reflection at the barrier, just as you had it for the infinite potential well.
We have seen the finite and the infinite potential well, as well as the potential step. Now, what happens if
the potential is actually a rectangular barrier of height 𝑉0 of width a as shown in Fig. 9.2.
88
…………………………….......
V0
𝑥=0 𝑥=𝑎
We identify three regions, one to the left of 𝑥 = 0 (region I), between 𝑥 = 0 and 𝑥 = 𝑎 (region II), and
beyond 𝑥 = 𝑎 (region III).
0, x 0
V V0 , 0 x a
0, x a
Region I:
d 2 2m
E 0
dx 2 2 9.51
d 2 2m
( E V0 ) 0
dx 2 2 9.52
II Cei x De i x
89
2mE 2m( E V0 )
k 2
where , and 2
2m(V0 E )
E V0
Bear in mind that if , we can write i , where 2 9.55
d d
I I
dx x 0 dx x 0 ik ( A B) i (C D) 9.57
d d
II III i a i a
dx xa dx xa i Ce i De i k Eeika 9.59
Hence,
k k
A C D
2k 2k 9.62
or
k i ( k ) a
C Ee
2 9.63
90
We can also get D as follows:
k i ( k ) a
D Ee
2 9.65
Putting equations 3.13 and 3.14 into equation 3.12, we conclude that,
k k i ( k ) a k k i ( k ) a
A Ee Ee
2k 2 2k 2 9.66
Therefore,
A (k ) 2 i ( k ) a (k ) 2 i ( k ) a
e e
E 4k 4k
9.67
Or
A (k ) 2 i ( k ) a (k ) 2 i ( k ) a
e e
E 4k 4k 9.68
V0 E
We have assumed that , and this resulted in some wave being transmitted beyond the point x = 0.
V0 E i
For , , meaning that, from equation 3.18,
A (k i )2 i ( k (i )) a (k i )2 i ( k (i )) a
e e
E 4ik 4ik 9.69
(k i )2 (ik ) a (k i )2 (ik ) a
e e
= 4ik 4ik 9.70
(k i )2 ika a (k i )2 ika a
e e e e
= 4ik 4ik 9.71
eika
(k i )2 e a (k i )2 e a
= 4ik 9.72
91
Hence, if k 2ik , then * k 2ik
2 2 2 2
A
4
eika
ik
(k 2 2 2ik )e a (k 2 2 2ik )e a
E 9.74
eika
*
A
(k 2 2 2ik )e a (k 2 2 2ik )e a
E 4ik
9.75
A
eika
e a *e a
E 4ik 9.77
eika
*
A
* e a e a
E 4ik
9.78
e
*
A A 1 a
* e a *e a e a
E E 16k
2 2
9.79
16k
1
2 2
| | 2
e2 a ( )2 ( *)2 | |2 e 2 a
= 9.80
1
16k 2 2
| | 2
(e2 a e 2 a ) [( )2 ( *)2 ]
9.81
(k 2ik ) k 4k 2k 4ik 4ik
2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 3 2
9.82
2 ( *)2
= 2k 12k 2 = 2(k 2k 4k )
4 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 4
= 2(k 2k ) 8k
4 2 2 4 2 2
92
= 2(k ) 8k
2 2 2 2 2
9.84
Hence,
(k
*
A A 1
2 )2 (e2 a e 2 a ) [2(k 2 2)2 8k 2 2]
2
E E 16k
2 2
2 a
1 2 2 2 (e e 2 a )
2( k ) 2(k 2 2) 2 8k 2 2
16k 2 2
2
=
(k 2 2 ) 2 (e 2 a e 2 a ) 4k 2 2
1 2
16k 2 2 2 (k 2 ) 2
(k 2 2 ) 2 4k 2 2
8k 2 2 (k 2 2 ) 2
cosh( 2 a ) 1
9.86
But
2 2
e 2 e 2 e e e e
2 2 2
or
or
93
cosh 2 sinh 2 1
Therefore,
A A
*
(k 2 2 ) 2 4k 2 2
8k 2 2
2
(k 2 2 ) 2
sinh ( a )
E E
(k 2 2 ) 2 1
sinh 2 ( a)
8k 2 2
2
9.87
1
(k )
2 2 2 2
E 1
T sinh 2 ( a)
A 8k
2 2
2 9.88
As you can see, the transmission coefficient is not zero as predicted by classical physics for a particle with
energy less than the potential barrier. This is what is called tunnelling, as the particle has effectively
tunnelled through the barrier.
1 In both kinds of potential, a part of the particle is reflected, quite unlike the classical prediction that
the particle should only slow down.
2 Due to the wave nature of a particle, provided the potential is not infinite, there is a finite
probability of finding it beyond the point x = 0.
3 In the case of potential barrier, there is a possibility of finding the particle beyond x = 0, if the
potential is finite.
4 If the barrier is thin enough, the particle can tunnel through it.
94
SAQ 9.1
A particle of mass m is incident from the left on the potential step shown in Fig. Find the probability that
it will be scattered backward by the potential if
(b) 𝐸 < 𝑉0
𝑉0
0 𝑎 𝑥
95
Study Session 10: Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation in One Dimension II
Introduction
Perhaps one of the most important concepts in Physics is that of the harmonic oscillator. This is because a
lot of physical phenomena are fashioned after this kind of idealized motion. You must be quite familiar
with the motion of a harmonic oscillator: it is confined within the two positions where the total mechanical
energy, E, is equal to the potential energy. At these positions, the kinetic energy, or equivalently, the
velocity is zero, and the particle has to change directions. In this Unit, you will learn about the quantum-
mechanical equivalent. You will then see that the energy can only take specific values, and that the ground
state energy is not zero.
You would recall that the potential for the simple harmonic oscillator is
1
m 02 x 2
V (x) = 2 10.1
2 d 2 1
m 02 x 2 E
2m dx 2 2 10.2
As we do at times, we consider an extreme value of 𝑥, in this case large values of 𝑥 where 𝑉 ≫ 𝐸. We can
then modify the function that satisfies the large values of x by multiplying by a polynomial when the
extreme condition is no longer valid.
2 d 2 1
2
m 02 x 2 0
2m dx 2 10.3
Let
96
( x) A exp( x 2 / 2a 2 ) 10.4
Then,
d x
2 A exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
dx a 10.5
d 2 1 x2
2
2
A exp( x 2
/ 2 a 2
) 4
A exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
dx a a
d 2 1 x2
dx 2 a2 a4 10.6
or
d 2 x 2
4
dx 2 a 10.7
since x is large.
2 x2 1
m 0 x 2
2
4
2m a 2 ,
i.e.,
2
a
4
m 2 0
2
10.8
2
a4
m 2 0 .
2
For small x , the approximation V E is no longer valid, and the wave function must be modified
appropriately. As is often the practice, we shall multiply for the extreme value of x by a polynomial,
x
H
which in this case is a . To take into consideration the various possible eigenfunctions, we write the
trial function in the form,
x
n ( x) An H n exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
a 10.9
97
An Hn
where is the normalisation constant and is a polynomial in x / a .
H 0 ( x / a) 1
For the ground state, let us choose the simplest polynomial, . So, we try the solution
0 ( x) A0 exp( x / 2a ) . 2 2
1
m 0
2
2 d 2 2 E
x 2
m 2 0 m0
2 2 2
dx
10.10
2
a4
m 0 2 2
Putting , we obtain
d 2 2 E
a4 x 2
m 0
2 2
dx
10.11
1 x2 2 E0
a 2 4 x 2
4
m 0
2
a a
10.12
2 E0
a2
m 0
2
x0 : 10.13
1 1
E0 m 0 a 2 0
2
2
x : 2 2 10.14
dx A0 2
exp( x 2 / a 2 )dx A0 a
2 2
10.15
Therefore,
1
0 ( x) exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
a 10.16
98
and
1
E0 0
2 10.17
Before we take on the excited states, we shall derive the dimensionless form of the time-independent
Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator.
We recall that,
d 2 2m
2
2 [ E V ( x)]
dx
d d dx d d 2 2 d
2
a a
Let us set R x / a . Then, dR dx dR dx and dR 2 dx 2 , implying that,
1 d 2 2m
2 2
2 [ E V ( x)]
a dR 10.18
or
d 2 2ma 2
[ E V ( x)]
dR 2 2
10.19
2ma 2 2ma 2
E W ( R ) V ( R)
Let 2 and 2
d 2
[ W ( R)]
dR 2 10.20
or
d 2
W ( R)
dR 2 10.21
99
2ma 2 2ma 2
E W ( R ) V ( R)
R x / a, 2 and 2
2 2
These are all dimensionless quantities. We can then see that the energy scale is /( 2ma ) , i.e.,
E V ( R)
2 2
W ( R) 2
/ 2ma and / 2ma 2 .
Let us write
E / E0 . Then, equation 1.21 becomes
d 2 x 2
a 2
dx 2 a 2 10.22
d 2
2 R 2
dR 10.23
Let
n An H n ( R) exp( R 2 / 2)
Then,
d n dH n
An exp( R 2 / 2) RAn H n ( R) exp( R 2 / 2)
dR dR
10.24
d 2 n d 2Hn dH n
2
An exp( R 2
/ 2) 2
RAn exp( R 2 / 2)
dR dR dR
dH n
An H n ( R) exp( R 2 / 2) RAn exp( R 2 / 2) R 2 An H n ( R) exp( R 2 / 2)
dR
10.25
n
Substituting equation 1.25 for the second differential of with respect to R in equation 10.23 with
n An H n ( R) exp( R / 2)
2
,
d 2Hn dH n
An exp( R / 2)
2
2
RAn exp( R 2 / 2)
dR dR
100
dH n
An H n ( R) exp( R 2 / 2) RAn exp( R 2 / 2) R 2 An H n ( R) exp( R 2 / 2)
dR
R 2 An H n ( R) exp( R 2 / 2) n An H n ( R) exp( R 2 / 2)
10.26
d 2 H n ( R) dH n ( R) dH
R H n ( R) R n R 2 H n ( R)
R H n ( R) n H n ( R)
2 2
dR dR dR
or
d 2Hn dH n
2
2R ( n 1) H n 0
dR dR
10.27
dH n
nan R n1 (n 2)an2 R n3 ...
dR
d 2Hn
n(n 1)a n R n2 (n 2)( n 3)a n2 R n4 ...
dR 2 10.28
dH n
2R 2na n R n 2(n 2)a n 2 R n 2 ...
dR 10.29
( n 1) H n ( n 1)( a n R n a n 2 R n 2 ...)
10.30
d 2Hn dH n
2
2R ( n 1) H n
dR dR
2 2 m 0 2 m 0 (2n 1)
2 2
1
En 0 0 n 0
2ma 2
2m 2 E 0 2m 2 0 4 4 2 where we made use
2 E0 2ma 2
a2 E
m 0
2
of: 2 .
5ħw0 /2
3ħw0 /2
ħw0 /2
Let us see if we can find the wave functions. We try by substituting a trial wave function into Hermite’s
dH 2 d 2H2
2bR 2
2b
dR and dR
x2
2 ( x) A2 1 2 2 exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
a 10.32
102
We list the first three energy eigenvalues and wavefunctions for the simple harmonic oscillator. For the
graph in Fig. 1.2, we have chosen a = 1.
n Wavefunction
0 1/ 2
1
exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
a
1 1/ 2
1 x
2 exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
2a a
2
1
1/ 2
2
2 4 x exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
8a a
3
1
1/ 2
x x 3
12 8 exp( x 2 / 2a 2 )
48a a a
1 1
E n n 0 0
Notice that 2 ; and thus, the ground state energy is not zero, but 2 .
But, you may ask, why do we not observe the ground state in everyday Physics. It is because the number
is so small that only when the system is very small (typically atomic and subatomic) that it becomes
significant. This is because some other parameters, such as the mass and distances are also small.
n=0
n=1
n=2
103
Summary of Study Session 10
In this study session 10, you have learnt:
1 That the quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator can only attain a set of quantised energies.
2 That the ground state energy is ℏ𝜔0, as is the case with the classical oscillator.
3 The energy levels are equispaced.
4 The ground state is not observed in day to day Physics because is such a small number.
SAQ 10.1
m 2
( x) A exp x
Normalise the eigenfunction 2 . Hence, find the probability that the particle
SAQ 10.2
A quantum-mechanical oscillator of mass m moves in one dimension such that its energy
References/Further Readings
1. Quantum Mechanics demystified - David McMahon.
104
APPENDIX
105
SOLUTIONS TO SELF-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS
STUDY SESSION 1
SAQ 1.1
Show that the following are vector spaces over the indicated field:
(i) The set of real numbers over the field of real numbers.
a b R a,bR
(ii) The set of complex numbers over the field of real numbers.
Let the set be C be the set of complex numbers, then,
c1 c2 C a , b C
and cR c C , C
a1 x 2 b1 x 2 c1 a2 x 2 b2 x 2 c2
106
SAQ 1.2
(i) 2i 3 j k , i j 3k and 3i 2 j k
2 1 3 0
a 3 b 1 c 2 0
1 3 1 0
2a b 3c 0
3a b 2c 0
a 3b c 0
Alternatively,
2 1 3
3 1 2 2(1 6) 1(3 2) 3(9 1)
1 3 1
2(5) 5 30 35 0
i 1 2 1 1 2 i 2i
2 2i i 2i 3 i
(ii) , , and i 2
107
SAQ 1.3
i 1 2 1 1 2 i 2i 0 0
a b c d
2 2i i 2i 3 i i 2 0 0
Expanding,
ai 2b c id 0
(i)
a b 2c 2id 0
(ii)
2a ib 3c id 0
(iii)
2ia 2ib ic 2d 0
(iv)
(1 2i)b 2ic 3d 0
(vi)
(2 i )b 7c 5id 0 (vii)
108
a(1 2i) 11
b c
From (v) and (viii), 5 2i 4
Hence,
a(1 2i)(2i 4) 8 6i
c a
55 55
(1 2i) 8 6i
(1 2i) a 2i a 3d 0
5 55
(3 4i) 16i 12
a a 3d
5 55
Putting b, c, d in (i),
a(1 2i ) 8 6i 12i 9
ai 2 ai a0
5 55 55
4 6 9 8 2 12
ai1 a 0
5 55 55 55 5 55
55 44 6 9 8 22 12
ai a 0
55 55
18 26
a i 0
55 55 . Hence, a = 0, meaning that b, c, and d are also zero.
ai 2b c id 0
(i)
a b 2c 2id 0
(ii)
2a ib 3c id 0
(iii)
109
2ia 2ib ic 2d 0
(iv)
i 2 1 i
1 1 2 2i
0
2 i 3 i
2i 2i i 2
Check if
SAQ 1.4
1 1
,
1 1
Show whether or not the set is a basis for the two-dimensional Euclidean space.
1 1 0
a b
1 1 0
a b 0 , a b 0
ab
a and b do not have to be zero. Hence, the vectors are not linearly independent. Sketch the vectors
and satisfy yourself that they are indeed linearly dependent: one can be got from the other because
they are indeed on a line.
Alternately,
1 1
0
1 1
SAQ 1.5
1 2
Find the coordinates of the vector 2 i with respect to the basis
110
1 0 0 1 0 i 1 0
, , ,
0 1 1 0 i 0 0 1 .
1 2 1 0 0 1 0 i 1 0
2 i a 0 1 b1 0 c i 0 d 0 1
1 a d (i)
2 b ic (ii)
2 b ci (iii)
i ad (iv)
1 i
a
2
(i) – (iv):
1 i
d
2
(ii) + (iii):
0b
(iii) – (ii):
2
2i c
i
Hence,
1 2 1 i 1 0 0 1 0 i 1 i 1 0
2 i 2 0 1 01 0 2i i 0 2 0 1
111
STUDY SESSION 2
SAQ 2.1
Which of the following functions are even and which ones are odd?
2
(i) x sin x cosh x (ii)
| e x | cosh 2 x (iii) sec x
Solutions
(i) is odd, being the product of two even functions and an odd function.
(ii) is an even function, a product of two even function.
(iii) is an even function:
1 1
sec( x) sec x
cos( x) cos x
SAQ 2.2
Show that
Solutions
(i)
sin mx cos nxdx 0 , the integrand is an odd
function
(ii)
sin mx sin nxdx 2 cos(m n) x cos(m n) xdx
1
112
1 1 1
sin( m n) x sin( m n) x 0
2 m n mn
113
STUDY SESSION 3
SAQ 3.1
Solutions
x
(i) h( x) e cosh x , h( x) e x cosh( x) e x cosh x
cosh x sinh x
cosh 2 x
SAQ 3.2
(i)
a
x 2 n 1 dx n 0,1, 2, ....
,
a
(ii)
a
x 2 n dx n 0,1, 2, ....
,
114
Solutions
(i)
a
x 2 n1dx
= 0, the integrand being an odd function.
a
x 2 n1 a 2 n1
a 2 2
a x dx 20 x dx 2n 1
a
2n 2n
(ii) 0 2n 1
SAQ 3.3
3 x
If the matrix 1 2 is a proper orthogonal matrix, find x.
3 x
det 6 x 1
1 2 ,
And
𝑥=5
115
STUDY SESSION 4
SAQ 4.1
y i
If the matrix i 2 is Hermitian, find the value of y.
SAQ 4.2
2 1 3
1, 0 , 7
0 1 1
Show that the set is a basis for the 3-dimensional Euclidean space. Show
that the set is not orthogonal. Hence, construct an orthogonal set from the vectors.
Solution
The set must be linearly independent:
2 1 3
0 7 1 7 1 0
1 0 7 2 1 3 2(7) 1(1) 3(1) 16 0
1 1 0 1 0 1
0 1 1
116
Since we have 3 linearly independent vectors in the 3-dimensional Euclidean
space, the vectors form a basis for the space.
2 1 3
1, 0 , 7
0 1 1
To construct an orthogonal set:
2
u1 v1 1
0
( v 2 , u1 )
u2 v2 2
u1
u1
In this case,
2
( v 2 , u1 ) 1 0 1 1 2
0
2
2 1 0 1 5
2
u1
0
Hence,
1 2 1 4 / 5 1/ 5
( v 2 , u1 ) 2
u2 v2 2
u1 0 1 0 2 / 5 2 / 5
u1 1 5 0 1 0 1
In this case,
117
2 1/ 5
u1 1 u 2 2 / 5
0 1
2
( v 3 , u1 ) 3 7 1 1 1
0
5
2
u1
1/ 5
3 14
( v 3 , u 2 ) 3 7 1 2 / 5 1
22
1 5 5 5
1/ 5
1
1 / 5 2 / 5 1 2 / 5
4 30 6
1
2
u2
1 25 25 25 5
Hence,
3 2 1/ 5
( v 3 , u1 ) (v 3 , u 2 ) 1 22 / 5
u3 v3 u1 u 2 7 1 2 / 5
1 5 0 6 / 5 1
2 2
u1 u2
3 2 1 / 5 3 2 / 5 11 / 15 40 / 15
1 11
7 1 2 / 5 7 1 / 5 22 / 15 80 / 15
1 5 0 3 1 1 0 11 / 3 8 / 3
8/3
16 / 3
8/3
118
2 1 / 5 8 / 3
1, 2 / 5 , 16 / 3
0 1 8 / 3
SAQ 4.3
Show that the set you obtained in SAQ 6.2 is not an orthonormal set, even though it is an orthogonal set.
Normalise each vector in the set. Hence, expand the normalised vector 1 2 1 / 6 in terms
of this basis. Calculate the probability that the system represented by the vector is in each of these
states.
Solution
The norms of the vectors in the set are, respectively, 5, 6 / 5 and 128 / 3 . Hence, the
normalised set is,
2 1/ 5 8 / 3
1 1 1
1, 2 / 5 , 16 / 3
5 0 6 / 5 1 128 / 3 8 / 3
2 1/ 5 8/3
c1 5 3
1 c2 2 / 5 c3 16 / 3
5 6 128
0 1 8/3
1
c1 (1 , ) 2 1 0 2 4
1
6 5 1 30
1
c2 (2 , )
5 1
1 / 5 2 / 5 1 2 5 1 4 1
6 6 1 6 5 5
1
c3 (3 , )
3
1 2 1 2 3 8 4 8 8 2
8
128 3 6 1 4 83 6 3 6 3 2 3
119
16 8 1 4
| c1 | 2 | c2 |2 | c3 | 2
30 15 45 9
16 1 4 48 2 40 90
| c1 | 2 | c2 | 2 | c3 | 2 1
30 45 9 90 90
You know we could have expanded the vector in terms of the basis vectors, but we chose to make
use of the fact that,
ci (i , )
{ k }nk 1
Provided is an orthonormal set, and
n
| c
i 1
i |2 1
Provided, in addition, the vector we expanded in terms of the orthonormal basis is itself
normalised, as it is the case in this SAQ.
SAQ 4.4
0, 0 x a
V
, elsewhere
i 2 x 2 2 x 1 3 x
sin sin sin
2 a a 3a a 2a a
2 n x
sin
Given that the allowable wave functions are of the form a a , what is the probability of
obtaining each result?
120
Solution
3
2 n x
sin
a a n1
The allowable wave functions are of the form . Hence the expansion in terms of
these eigenfunctions is,
i 2 x 1 2 2 x 1 2 3 x
sin sin sin sin sin
2 a a 3 a a 2 a a
c i / 2 c 2 1 / 2 c3 1 / 2
Since 1 , , , the probability, respectively, that the particle will be found
in these states (n = 1, 2, 3) is:
i i 1 | c |2 1 1 1 1 1 1
| c1 | 2 2 | c3 | 2
2 2 4, 2 2 2 , 2 2 4
SAQ 4.5
1 x A 2 x 3 3 x
( x) sin sin sin
5a a a a 6a a
(d) What are the possible results of measurements of the energy, and what are the respective
probabilities of obtaining each result?
Solution
1 x A 2 x 3 3 x
( x) sin sin sin
5a a a a 6a a
1 2 x A 2 2 x 3 2 3 x
sin sin sin
5a 2 a a 2 a 6a 2 a
121
1 2 x A 2 2 x 3 2 3 x
sin sin sin
10 a a 2 a a 2 6 a a
1 A 3
1 2 3
10 2 2 6
For to be normalized,
( ( x), ( x)) 1
1 A 3 1 A 3
1 2 3 , 1 2 3 1
or 10 2 2 6 10 2 2 6
1 A2 9
1
10 2 24
9 1 120 45 12 63
A 2 21 2
or 24 10 120 60 .
63
A
Hence, 60
1 63 3
1 2 3
10 120 2 6
2 2 2 2 2 9 2 2
E1 E 2 E 3
2ma 2 , ma 2 , 2ma 2 ,
1 63 9
2 2 2
|c |
and the probabilities, respectively, are | c1 | = 10 , | c2 | = 120 , 3 = 24
122
STUDY SESSION 5
SAQ 5.1
Find the maximum kinetic energy with which an electron is emitted from a photometal of work
39 39
function 3.2 10 J when a radiation of energy E = 3.313 10 J falls on it, given
39
that the work function is 3.2 10 J .
Solution
1 2
mv E W (3.313 10 39 3.2 10 39 ) J
2 1.13 10 40 J
SAQ 5.2
6
What is the wavelength of the wave associated with an electron moving at 10 m / s .
Solution
h p
h 6.626 10 34
31
7.28 10 10 m
p 9.1 10 10 6
123
STUDY SESSION 6
SAQ 6.1
1. By solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a free particle (V = 0), find the condition
imposed on the angular frequency and the wavenumber.
2
( x, t ) i ( x, t )
2m x 2
t (i)
Solution
Let
( x, t ) Ae i ( kx t )
Then,
2
( x, t ) k 2 Ae i ( kx t ) k 2 ( x, t )
x 2
( x, t ) i Ae i ( kx t ) i ( x, t )
t
2k 2
2m
SAQ 6.2
2 2 2
2 2 2
x y z
=0
124
Solution
( x, y, z ) X ( x)Y ( y ) Z ( z )
1 d2X 1 d 2Y 1 d 2Z
0
X ( x) dx 2 Y ( y ) dy 2 Z ( z ) dz 2 (i)
For i.e., equation (i) to be valid, each term on the left must be separately equal to a constant.
1 d2X 1 d 2Y 1 d 2Z
k3
2 2 2
2
k1 ; 2
k 2 ; 2
X ( x) dx Y ( y ) dy Z ( z ) dz
k1 k 2 k3 0
2 2 2
We can see that not all these constants can be real nor all imaginary. At least one of them must be
real and one imaginary. The third may be real or imaginary. Which constants are real and which
are imaginary will be decided by the physical situation of the problem we are dealing with.
Let
k1 2 k 2 2 k 2
2 2 2
, and 3
Then,
1 d2X 1 d 2Y 1 d 2Z
2
; 2
; 2
X ( x) dx 2 Y ( y ) dy 2 Z ( z ) dz 2
125
X ( x) A1e ix A2 e ix (i)
iy iy
Y ( y) B1e B2e (ii)
z z
Z ( z ) C1e C2e (iii)
These are just a particular solution of the partial differential equation. As there may be other values
of
, and which could give valid solutions, the general solution is:
( x, y, z ) Ar1ei r x Ar 2ei r x B s1ei s y B s 2ei s y C t1e t z C t 2e t z
r , s ,t
SAQ 6.3
n
x
( x) e 2 x / x0
What would the potential function be if x0 is an eigenfunction of the
Solution
n
dF x n1 2 x
n n e 2 x / x0 e 2 x / x0
dx x0 x0 x0
2 n
d 2F x n2 2 x / x0 x n1 2 2 x / x0 2 x n 1 2 x / x0 2 x 2 x / x0
n ( n 1) e n e n n e e
dx 2 x0 x0
n n
x0 x0 x0 x0 x0
2 n
x n2 2 x n 1 2 x n 1 2 x 2 x / x0
n(n 1) n e 2 x / x0 n n e 2 x / x0 n n e 2 x / x0 e
x0 x0 x0 x0 x0 x0 x0
2 n
x n2 4 x n 1 2 x / x0 2 x 2 x / x0
n(n 1) n e 2 x / x0 n n e e
x0 x0 x0 x0 x0
2 n
n(n 1) x n 2 x / x0 4 x n 2 x / x0 2 x 2 x / x0
e n n e e
x 2 x0 n 0 0
xx x x0 x0
126
n(n 1) 4 2
2
xn
n n e 2 x / x0
x x0
2
xx0 x0
n(n 1) 4 2
2
n ( x)
x xx0 x0
2
2 d 2 ( x) 2 n(n 1) 4 2
2
n ( x) (V E ) ( x)
2m dx 2 2m x 2 xx0 x0
When x ,
V ( x) 0 , meaning that,
2 2
E 2
mx0
Therefore,
2 n(n 1) n
V ( x) 2
4
2m x xx0
127
STUDY SESSION 7
SAQ 7.1
Potential:
0, 0 x L / 2
V ( x)
, elsewhere
If at
t0
, the wave function is
( x) Ax( L x / 2) , i.e., ( x,0) Ax( L x / 2) ,
(ii) Write
( x, t ) as a series, where t 0 .
Solution
L/2
2 2 x x4 x5
2 3
2 2 x
L/2
0
A x L dx
2
A
L
3
L
4 5 0
(i) =
1 1 1 31 2 5
A 2 L5 A L 1
24 64 160 960
960 15 15
A 8 8 x( L x / 2)
5 5 5
Hence, 31L 31L . The normalised wave function is 31L .
(ii) The allowed eigenfunctions for the well can be deduced from those of the well
0, | x | L
V ( x)
, elsewhere
by making a transformation L L / 2 .
128
2 n x
n ( x) sin
Recall that for the latter well, L L . For the well at hand, then,
2 n x 4 2n x 2 2n x
n ( x) sin sin sin
L/2 L/2 L L L L , and the energy eigenvalues are
n 2 2 2 n 2 2 2
En E
2m( L / 2) 2 as against n 2mL2 for the well of length L.
At time t 0 ,
2 2 j x iEn t /
( x,0) c j (0) sin e
j 1 L L
L/2 2 2 j x 8 15
L sin x ( L x / 2) dx
c j (0) ( j , ( x,0)) 0
L 31L5
where
16 15 L/2 2 j x
L3
31
0
sin
L
x( L x / 2) dx
16 15 3L3 48 15
L3 31 j j 31
129
L/2
I1 0
x sin wxdx
1
v cos wx
Let x u . Then, dx du . Let sin wxdx dv . Then, w
L/2 L/2
x 1
I 1 cos wx 2 sin wx
w 0 w 0
L/2 x2
I2 sin wxdx
0 2
L/2
2I 2 x 2 sin wxdx
0
We have integrated
2I 2 , so you would know how to integrate
x 2 sin wxdx
.
1
v cos wx
Let x u . Then, 2 xdx du . Let sin wxdx dv . Then,
2
w
2 x
L/2 L/2
x2 1 L/2
w 0
2 I 2 cos wx sin wx sin wxdx
w 0
w w 0
130
2 x
L/2 L/2 L/2
x2 1
2 I 2 cos wx sin wx 2 cos wx
w 0
w w 0 w 0
1
I LI 1 I 2 LI 1 2 I 2
The integral we are interested in is, 2 .
Therefore,
1
2 x
L/2 L/2 L/2 L/2 L/2
xL L x2 1
I cos wx 2 sin wx cos wx sin wx 2 cos wx
w 0 w 0
2
w 0
w w 0 w 0
L/2
1 1
L/2 L/2 L/2 L/2
L L x2 1
I x cos wx 2 sin wx cos wx x sin wx cos wx
w 0 w 0
2w 0
w w 0 2w 2 0
L L L L L
I cos w 0 cos 0 2 sin w sin 0
w 2 2 w 2
( L / 2) 2 L (0) 2 1 L L 1 L
cos w cos 0 2 sin w 0 sin 0 cos w cos 0
w 2 2w
3
2 w 2 2w 2 2
L L L L L
I cos w 2 sin w
w 2 2 w 2
( L / 2) 2 L 1 L L 1 L
cos w 2 sin w cos w 1
2 w 2 w 2 2 2w3 2
2 j
w
But L , or wL 2 j
L L L ( L / 2) 2 1 L
I cos 2 j 2 sin 2 j
1
cos 2 j 2 sin 2 j cos 2 j 1
w 2 w w 2 2w
3
2 w
L L ( L / 2) 2 1
cos 2 j 2 0 cos 2 j 1
1
I cos 2 j 0
w 2
3
2 w w 2w
131
L L ( L / 2) 2
0 2 1 1
1 1
I 0
w 2 2w w w
L L2 ( L / 2) 2 L L3 L3 3L3
I
2 j 2 2(2 j ) 4 j 16 j j
SAQ 7.2
Solution
a a
a
* ( x) ( x)dx A 2 (ax x 2 ) 2 dx
a
a
2 A 2 (ax x 2 ) 2 dx
0
, since the integrand is an even function, and the limit of
integration is from – a to a.
a a
2 A 2 (ax x 2 ) 2 dx 2 A 2 (a 2 x 2 x 4 2ax 3 )dx
0 0
a3 a5 a4 1 1 1
2 A (a
2
2a ) 2a 5 A 2
2
3 5 4 3 5 2
10 6 15 1
2a 5 A 2 2a 5 A 2 1
30 30
A 30 / 2a 5
30 a 30 a
x 2a 5 a
(ax x 2 ) x(ax x 2 )dx
2a 5 a
x(ax x 2 ) 2 dx 0
, since the integrand is an
odd function.
30 a 30 a
x 2a 5
2 a
(ax x 2 ) x 2 (ax x 2 )dx 2
2a 5 0
x 2 (ax x 2 ) 2 dx 0
, since the integrand
is an even function.
132
30 a 60 a
2
2a 5 0
x 2 (ax x 2 ) 2 dx
2a 5 0
x 2 (a 2 x 2 x 4 2ax 3 )dx
a
30a 5 (a 2 x 4 x 6 2ax 5 )dx
0
30 7 1 1 1 2 21 15 35 30a 2 2a 2
5 a 30a
a 5 7 3 105 105 7
2a 2 2a 2 2
x x 2 x 2 02 a
7 7 7
SAQ 7.3
x x
A1 cos sin
Wave function is given as L L .
(vi) Find the average energy of the system at time t = 0 and at an arbitrary time𝑡0 .
(vii) Find the average energy of the particle.
(viii) Write the expression for the probability that the particle is found within 0 x L / 2 ?
Solution
x x
2
A 1 cos dx 1
2
sin 2
L L
L x x x x 2 x
A 2 sin 2 sin 2 cos 2 2 cos sin dx 1
or
0
L L L L L
x x 1 2 x
sin 2 1 cos 2 [1 cos ]
But L L 2 L
133
L 1 2 x 1 2 x 1 2 x x 1 2 x
A 2 [1 cos ] [1 cos ] [1 cos ] 2 cos [1 cos ] dx 1
0
2 L 2 L 2 L L 2 L
=
L 1 2 x 1 2 x 1 2 x x 1 2 x
A 2 [1 cos ] [1 cos ] [1 cos ] 2 cos [1 cos ] dx 1
0
2 L 2 L 2 L L 2 L
L 1 1 2 x 1 2 x x x 2 x
A 2 cos [1 cos 2 ] cos cos cos dx
=
0 2
2 L 4 L L L L
L 1 1 2 x 1 1 4 x x x 2 x
A 2 cos [1 {1 cos }] cos cos cos dx
0 2
2 L 4 2 L L L L
L 1 1 2 x 1 1 4 x x x 2 x
A 2 cos [ cos }] cos cos cos dx
0 2
2 L 8 8 L L L L
cos a cos b
1
cos(a b) cos(a b)
Now, 2 . Hence,
x 2 x 1 3 x x
cos cos cos cos
L L 2 L L , since cos( x) cos x
L 1 1 2 x 1 1 4 x x 1 3 x x
A2
0 2 2 cos L [ 8 8 cos L }] cos L 2 cos L cos L dx
L
x L 2 x x L 4 x L x L 3 x L x
A
2
sin
L 0
sin sin sin sin
= 2 4 L 8 32 L L 6 L 2
L
x x L L 5
A2 A2 A2 L 1
= 2 8 0 = 2 8 8
Hence,
8
A
5L
134
8 x x
1 cos sin
The normalized wave function is 5L L L
2 n x
n sin
(ii) We know that the allowable solutions are of the form L L and the energy
eigenvalues are (from equation 3.2, Module 3, Unit 1)
n 2 2 2
En
2mL2 , n = 1, 2, 3, …
( x, t ) An (t ) n ( x,0)
n
where
iE t
An (t ) An (0) exp n
In this case,
8 x x
( x,0) 1 cos sin
5L L L
8 x 1 2 2 x
sin sin
= 5L L 2 5L L
we have,
2 1
A1 (0) A2 (0)
5, 2 5 , An (0) 0 for n 1, 2.
8 i 2 t 0 x 1 2 i 2 t 0 2x
( x, t 0 )
exp 2
sin exp 2
sin
5L 2mL L 2 5 L mL L
135
E n | E | n
n
A (0)
n
n
2
En
=
4 1
E1 E2
= 5 20
4 2 2 1 4 2 2 17 2 2 2 17 2 2
2
= 5 2ma 20 2ma 2 20 ma 2 10ma 2
x 2 x
2
L/2 L 8
0
| | 2 dx
0
1 cos
5L
sin
L L
dx
SAQ 7.4
0, 0 x a
V
, elsewhere
i 2 x 2 3 x 2 3 x
sin sin sin
2 a a 3a a 16a a
a. If the energy is measured, what are the possible results and what is the probability of
obtaining each result?
136
Solution
2 n x
sin
(a) The allowable wave functions are of the form a a . Hence the expansion in
terms of these eigenfunctions is,
i 1 1 2 3 x
sin 1 sin 2 sin
2 3 2 a a
n 2 2 2
En
2ma 2 , with n = 1, 2, 3
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 32 2 2 9 2 2
E1 E 2 E 3
2ma 2 , 2ma 2 ma 2 , 2ma 2 2ma 2
i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
| c1 | 2 | c2 | 2 | c3 | 2
2 2 4, 2 2 2, 2 2 4
2 2 2 1
E2 2
(b) The most probable energy of the particle is 2ma , with probability 2 .
PE i i 3
i 1
3
Pi Ei
P
i 1
i
i 1
is
(c) The average energy of the particle is , since the wave function
3
P
i 1
i 1
normalized, so that .
137
Hence, the average energy of the particle is
1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 9 2 2 1 2 2 8 2 2 9 2 2 9 2 2
4 2ma 2 2 ma 2 4 2ma 2 8 ma 2 8ma 2 8 ma 2 4ma 2
138
STUDY SESSION 8
SAQ 8.1
What are the allowable eigenfunctions and energy eigenvalues of the infinite potential
well?
0, L x L
V ( x)
, elsewhere
Solution
Potential well.
−∞ ∞
𝑣=0
𝑥 = −𝐿 𝑥=𝐿
Fig. 3.1: The infinite square well potential confining a particle to a region of width 𝑳
Inside the well, the potential is zero. Outside the well, the potential is infinite. We expect
that the wave function outside the well will be zero.
2 2m
2 ( E V ) 0
We recall Schrödinger equation x
2
.
When 𝑉 = 0,
139
d 2 2m
E 0
dx 2
(1.1)
d 2
k 2 0
dx 2
(1.2)
( x) A cos kx B sin kx
(1.3)
Since
(x ) = 0 for x L
A cos kL B sin kL 0
(i)
(x ) = 0 for x L
A cos kL B sin kL 0
(ii)
A cos kL 0
140
For this to be satisfied,
n
kL
2
, for n = 1, 2 …
(iii)
Therefore,
n
A cos x
2L
, n = 1, 2, …
(iv)
2mE
k2
2
OR
n 2
2
2L
2 2
k
En
2m 2m
n 2 2 2
En
8mL2
(ii) – (i):
B sin kL 0
In this case,
kL n
, for n = 1, 2, …
n
k
L
141
n x
( x) B sin
L
2mE
k2
2
OR
n 2
2
L
2 2
k
En
2m 2m
n 2 2 2
En
2mL2
L n x
( , ) A 2 sin 2 dx
L L
L 1 2n x
A2 1 cos dx
L 2 L
2n x
L
1 L
A2 x sin
2 2n L L
1 2
A [ L ( L)] A 2 L 1
2
1
A
L
1 n x
( x) sin
L L , n = 1, 2, …
143
STUDY SESSION 9
SAQ 9.1
1. A particle of mass m is incident from the left on the potential step shown in Fig. Find
the probability that it will be scattered backward by the potential if
(b) 𝐸 < 𝑉0
𝑉0
𝑎 𝑥
Solution
(a) 𝐸 > 𝑉0 :
Region I: I e
ik ( x a )
Re ik ( xa )
2mE 2m( E V0 )
k k'
Where 2
and 2 .
144
Matching the wave functions at 𝑥 = 𝑎,
1 R T
ik ikR ik 'T
Therefore,
k k'
R
k k'
(k k ' ) 2
| R |2
The probability of reflection is
(k k ' ) 2 .
(b) 𝐸 < 𝑉0
145
Region II: 𝜓𝐼𝐼 = 𝑇𝑒−𝑘(𝑥−𝑎)
2mE 2m(V0 E )
k k'
Where 2
and 2 .
1 R T
ik ikR k 'T
Therefore,
ik k '
R
ik k '
k 2 k '2
|R| 2
2
1
k k '2 ,
146
STUDY SESSION 10
m 2
( x) A exp x
10.1 Normalise the eigenfunction 2 . Hence, find the probability that the
𝟏
particle subjected to harmonic oscillation lies in the range 𝟎 ≤ 𝒙 ≤ .
𝟐
Solution
A 2 (e mx ) dx A 2 e mx
2 2
/ 2 2 /
dx
m
where
1
A2 e x dx A2
2
2
A 2 e x dx A 2 A2 A2
2
m / m
A2 1
m
m
A2
147
m
1/ 4
A
m m 2
1/ 4
( x) exp x
2
1
The probability of finding the oscillator between x = 0 and is
2
2
m 1 / 4 m 2
0
( x) dx
0
exp
2
x
m m 2
1/ 2
0
exp
x dx
m
0
exp x 2 dx
m 1 m 1 1
2 2 m
= 2
This makes sense, right? If the probability of finding the oscillator between and is unity,
since the wave function is normalised, then the probability of finding it between 0 and must be
half.
148
SAQ 10.2
A quantum-mechanical oscillator of mass m moves in one dimension such that its energy
ℏ𝟐 𝜸𝟐⁄
eigenstate 𝝍(𝒙) = (𝜸𝟐⁄𝝅)𝟏⁄𝟒 𝐞𝐱𝐩(−𝜸𝟐𝒙𝟐 ⁄𝟐)with energy.𝑬 = 𝟐𝒎
(a) Find the mean position of the particle.
(b) Find the mean momentum of the particle.
Solution
x * ( x) x ( x) dx ( 2 / )1 / 2 x exp( 2 x 2 ) dx
(a)
( 2 / )1 / 2 x exp( 2 x 2 ) dx
Let
y exp( 2 x 2 ) .
Then,
dy
2 x exp( 2 x 2 )
dx .
Hence,
dy 2 x exp( 2 x 2 ) dx
dy 2 x exp( 2 x 2 ) dx y c
But
y exp( 2 x 2 ) .
Therefore,
149
1
x exp( 2 x 2 ) dx
2
exp( 2 x 2 ) c
Hence,
1
x exp( 2 x 2 ) 0
2
(b)
d d
p * ( x) i ( x) dx ( 2 / )1 / 2 exp( 2 x 2 ) i exp( 2 x 2 )dx
dx
dx
(i)( 2 / )1 / 2 (2 2 x) exp( 2 x 2 ) dx
(i) 2 ( 2 / )1 / 2 2 x exp( 2 x 2 ) dx
(i) 2 ( 2 / )1 / 2 exp( 2 x 2 ) 0
150