0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views15 pages

LRT 6 Executive Summary English

The document provides an executive summary of an environmental impact statement for an unsolicited public-private partnership proposal for an elevated light rail transit system project in Metro Manila and Cavite, Philippines. The summary includes key details about the project components, estimated costs, construction timelines, and proponent information.

Uploaded by

Agnelo Qeurbal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views15 pages

LRT 6 Executive Summary English

The document provides an executive summary of an environmental impact statement for an unsolicited public-private partnership proposal for an elevated light rail transit system project in Metro Manila and Cavite, Philippines. The summary includes key details about the project components, estimated costs, construction timelines, and proponent information.

Uploaded by

Agnelo Qeurbal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (Executive Summary)


LRT Line-6A and Line-6B+C Project

1.1 Project Fact Sheet PD Summary


The project fact sheet Project Description (PD) Summary is presented in Table 1-1 below.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-1. Project Fact Sheet PD Summary

Project Name LRT Line-6A and Line-6B+C Project (“Project”)


Project LRT Line-6A: commencing from Niog Station in Bacoor City to Governors Station in Dasmariñas
Location City with 8 stations and approximate route length of 23.5 km. Alignment will traverse segments of
Molino Boulevard, privately-controlled properties and segments of Molino-Paliparan Road
LRT Line-6B: commencing from NAIA Terminal 1/Terminal 2 Station until San Nicolas Station in
Bacoor City with 10 stations and approximate route length of 16 km. Alignment will traverse
segments of Dr. A. Santos Avenue, A. Canaynay Avenue, CAA Road, Marcos Alvarez Ave., M.
Alvarez Extension and Alabang-Zapote Road and will pass through some privately-controlled
properties.
LRT Line-6C: commencing from Sucat Station until Lakefront Station with 6 stations and
approximate length of 7.7 km. Alignment will traverse Dr. A. Santos Avenue.
Alabang Zapote LRT Line with four stations and approximate length of 5 km from Marcos Alvarez
Station in Las Piñas City to Star Mall Station in Muntinlupa City. Alignment will traverse Alabang-
Zapote Road.
Geographic The geographic coordinates of the LRT Line-6 stations are provided below.
Coordinates
Stations Location Geographic Coordinates
LRT Line-6A °N Latitude °E Longitude
Niog Bacoor 140 27’ 20.72” 1200 57’ 38.20”
Bacoor City Hall Bacoor 140 26’ 08.16” 1200 58’ 07.60”
San Nicolas Bacoor 140 24’ 33.97” 1200 58’ 35.74”
Daang Hari Bacoor 140 23’ 04.10” 1200 58’ 48.28”
Alabang Bacoor 140 22’ 25.19” 1200 59’ 49.73”
San Pedro Dasmariñas 140 21’ 14.38” 1200 59’ 51.63”
La Salle Dasmariñas 140 19’ 43.77” 1200 59’ 11.88”
GMA Dasmariñas 140 18’ 42.36” 1200 59’ 19.18”
Governor’s Drive Dasmariñas 140 17’ 18.63” 1200 59’ 18.50”
LRT Line-6B
Sucat Parañaque 140 29’ 05.45” 1200 59 35.35”
Canaynay Parañaque 140 28’ 44.33” 1200 58’ 52.84”
Naga Las Piñas 140 27’ 39.23” 1200 59’ 40.98”
Alabang-Zapote Las Piñas 140 26’ 46.58” 1200 59’ 38.42”
Marcos- Alvarez Las Piñas 140 26’ 15.80” 1200 59’ 18.99”
Apollo Las Piñas 140 25’ 40.70” 1210 00’ 09.49”
Queen’s Row Las Piñas 140 25’ 19.65” 1200 59’ 48.47”
San Nicolas Bacoor 140 24’ 33.97” 1200 58’ 35.74”
LRT Line-6C
Sucat Parañaque 140 29’ 05.45” 1200 59’ 35.35”
Canaynay Parañaque 140 28’ 44.33” 1200 58’ 52.84”
El Grande Parañaque 140 28’ 08.59” 1210 00’ 39.46”
San Antonio Parañaque 140 27’ 52.53” 1210 01’ 12.88”
St. James Parañaque 140 27’ 30.82” 1210 01’ 54.70”
Lake Front Muntinlupa 140 27’ 10.31” 1210 02’ 55.03”
Alabang-Zapote LRT Line
Marcos Alvarez Las PIñas 140 26’ 15.80” 1200 59’ 18.99”
Town Center Las Piñas 140 25’ 50.92” 1210 00’ 56.48”
Madrigal Muntinlupa 140 25’ 33.74” 1210 01’ 41.74”
Star Mall Muntinlupa 140 25’ 02.97” 1210 02’ 42.84”

1
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Nature of New elevated railway system


Project The proposed Project is an Unsolicited Proposal for Public-Private Partnership (PPP) submitted to
the Philippine Government through the Department of Transportation (DOTr) on 13 January 2017
(Appendix 1). In a letter dated 23 July 2018, DOTr required Prime Asset Ventures, Inc. (PAVI) to
submit an ECC among other requirements to expedite the National Economic Development
Authority (NEDA) evaluation and approval of the project (Appendix 2). DOTr subsequently issued
the Original Proponent Status to PAVI on February 2019 (Appendix 3).
Project The policy objective for the proposed project is to pursue and achieve sustainable development of
Rationale the Cavite area and southern Metro Manila by providing convenient, affordable and safe movement
through a newly constructed mass transit system. The new railway line is expected to catalyze
economic growth and development through the generation of various business and job
opportunities along the railway corridor or railway alignment. The mass transit system is also
expected to help solve the traffic problems in the area.
Project The Project will consist of four interconnected railway lines, a total of 23 stations with three common
Components stations, a maintenance depot, signaling and communication system, fare collection system, and
traction electrification system.
Manpower At least 5,000 workers will be needed during the construction phase of the Project. During project
operation, about 700 to 1,200 personnel will be necessary to maintain and operate the various
railway segments of LRT 6.
Capital Cost The estimated project cost is Php72.2 billion.
Project Construction activities are estimated to be completed within 3.5 years for each railway line and will
Duration commence once government approvals and permits are secured by the project proponent.
Proponent Contact Details and Profile
Proponent’s Prime Asset Ventures, Inc. (see Appendix 4 for Proponent Accountability Statement)
Name
Authorized Tony Tan
Representative
Contact Details 02.226.3552 local 1041
[email protected]
Proponent’s UG/F Worldwide Corporate Center
Address Highway Hills, Shaw Boulevard, Mandaluyong City
Proponent PAVI is a 100% Filipino owned company that was incorporated on 18 August 2011 as an
Profile investment and holdings company with focus on building and development community
infrastructure. PAVI and its subsidiaries have invested in various industries including power and
water utilities, information technology, and telecommunications. Through the development and
management of different types of infrastructure, PAVI aims to ensure that lives in its partner
communities are made better and kept constantly connected. PAVI’s Prime Water Infrastructure
Corp. has over 30 years industry experience by providing water and sewage management solutions
in over 124 cities and municipalities within the 16 regions of the Philippines. Solorex Water
Technologies, Inc. has over 25 years industry experience and is engaged in supplying water
filtration, sterilization and purification equipment. PAVI also has interests in power systems
infrastructure through Kratos Res, Inc., S Power Corporation and Powersource Group, and
information and communication through ePrime and Streamtech.
EIA Preparer Contact Details
EIA Preparer Seastems, Inc. (see Appendix 5 for EIA Preparer’s Accountability Statement)
Authorized Alvin F. Nacu
Representative President
Address Room 314 Philippine Social Science Center
Commonwealth Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City
Contact Details +63.917.840.7192
[email protected]; [email protected]

2
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

1.2 Process Documentation of the conduct of the EIA


1.2.1 EIA Team
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Team consists of the following key specialists:
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-2. List of EIA Team Members
Name of Specialist Assigned EIA Module EIA Preparer Number
Alvin Nacu EIA Team Leader IPCO – 068
Armie Jean Perez Physical Environment / EIA Integration IPCO – 071
Arriane C. Tabanao Geology 00016581
Jose Alan Castillo, PhD Terrestrial Ecology -
Daniel Torres Terrestrial Wildlife -
Jethro Alden C. Hipe Meteorology/ Air and Noise Quality IPCO – 005
Ma. Theresa T. Agravante Socio-economy / Public Participation IPCO – 151
Randolph Carreon Traffic -
Pedro Peralta, Jr. GIS/Mapping IPCO – 254

1.2.2 EIA Study Schedule and Area


The EIA study commenced with the pre-scoping activities conducted from 24 October to 04 December 2018 in
the five host cities (Parañaque, Las Piñas, Muntinlupa, Bacoor and Dasmariñas) and 35 host barangays. The
pre-scoping activities included courtesy visits and information, education and communication (IEC) campaign
with city and barangay local government unit (LGU) officials, key informant interviews with LGU department
heads and staff (e.g. City Planning and Development Office (CPDO), City Traffic Management Office (TMO), City
Engineering Office, etc.), and focus group discussions with selected barangay and city officials.
The request for public scoping was submitted to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Environmental Management Bureau (DENR-EMB) after completion of the pre-scoping activities. The request for
scoping was submitted together with the following documents:
 Letter request for public scoping addressed to DENR-EMB
 Proof of conduct of IEC (documentation of IEC, FGD and KIIs) (Appendix 6)
 Initial perception survey results (Appendix 7)
 Proposed list of invitees for public scoping (Appendix 8)
 Draft invitation letter
 Draft presentation material
Preparation for the public scoping was commenced after DENR approved the scoping schedule. Arrangements
for the scoping venue were finalized and the invitation letters from DENR were distributed to the identified project
stakeholders.
The city-level public scoping was held from 18 to 20 February 2019 in the five host cities of the LRT 6 project. A
public scoping report (Appendix 9) was prepared after the scoping activities and this was submitted to DENR
EMB together with the request for technical scoping. The technical scoping with EIA review committee members
and EIARC resource persons was held on 08 March 2019 at the Environmental Impact Assessment and
Management Division (EIAMD) Conference Room. The scoping checklist accomplished during the technical
scoping is presented in Appendix 10.
Data collection for the EIA study was conducted from 11 March to 29 April 2019 while report writing was done
from April to May 2019. Client review of the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was done on June 2019,
after which a copy was submitted to DENR EMB for procedural screening.

1 Professional Registration Commission (PRC) ID No. as Registered Geologist

3
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

1.2.3 EIA Methodology


The methods used in the EIA study are summarized in Table 1-3.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-3. Methodology used in the EIA Study
Baseline Data Requirements Approach/Methodology
Parameter (Annex 2-7A) Baseline Characterization Impact Assessment
Land Use and  Description of existing land  Obtain land use maps and  Assess project impacts on land
Classification use/ zoning/classification comprehensive land use plans use and land values during the
 Land use map including (CLUPs) from host LGUs construction and operation
location of Environmentally  Field observations during ride phases
Critical Areas (ECAs) and through and site visit of project  Estimate the waste generation
special land features alignment during the construction and
 Devaluation of land values  Satellite imageries available from operation phases and determine
due to improper waste Google Earth possible locations of waste
disposal disposal areas
Geology/  Regional geology,  Obtain secondary data from Mines  Determine the possibility of
Geomorphology geomorphology, stratigraphy and Geosciences Bureau and occurrence of ground
and tectonic setting PHIVOLCS subsidence, landslides or other
 Local geology  Collect secondary information from natural hazards as a result of
 Geologic hazards published and unpublished sources project construction
 Field observations during ride  Determine the possibility of
through and site visits to project occurrence of soil erosion and
alignment runoff from borrow sites/quarries
Terrestrial Ecology  Flora and fauna species  Conduct field observations along  Predict the project impacts on
inventory project alignment protected areas, if any
 Summary of endemicity/  Key informant interviews  Estimate the extent of land
conservation status  Collect secondary information from clearing activities during site
 Summary of published and unpublished sources preparation and project
abundance/frequency of  Determine conservation and construction and determine how
distribution protection status of identified species this will affect biodiversity and
 Site observation/transect based on DENR and IUCN guidelines habitats
walk map
Hydrology/  Drainage systems  Collect data from DPWH, LWUA and  Determine project impacts on
Hydrogeology  Regional hydrogeology other concerned offices/agencies hydrologic conditions of natural
 Streamflow  Conduct flow measurements, if drainage channels and assess
measurements/mean necessary the possibility of occurrence of
monthly flow data flooding and inundation resulting
 Flood peaks, volumes and from project activities
rating curves with storm  Assess project impacts on
water flow estimates sediment quality due to
 Groundwater conditions wastewater generated during the
construction and operation
phases of the project
 Determine project impacts on
groundwater flow due to
construction of tunnel and other
underground facilities
Water Quality  Physico-chemical and  Collect grab surface water samples  Predict impacts of construction
bacteriological from pre-identified sampling stations activities on surface water quality
characteristics of  Store water samples in sterilized with particular emphasis on
groundwater and inland sampling bottles provided by the siltation and sedimentation
surface waters environmental laboratory resulting from construction
 Sampling site map  Submit water samples for laboratory activities and wastewater
analysis of identified parameters disposal from the construction
 Collect secondary data on river/lake camp
water quality from concerned  Predict impacts of project
agencies (DENR EMB, LLDA, etc.) operation on surface water

4
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Baseline Data Requirements Approach/Methodology


Parameter (Annex 2-7A) Baseline Characterization Impact Assessment
 Compare results to DENR water quality particularly on wastewater
quality standard values discharges from the stations,
substations and depot facilities
Meteorology/  Monthly average rainfall of  Obtain climate data (normal and  Estimate the CO2 emissions from
Climatology the area extremes), wind rose diagrams, construction equipment and
 Climatological normal and frequency of occurrence of tropical machinery and assess how this
extremes cyclones, and climate change will contribute to greenhouse gas
 Wind rose diagrams projections from PAGASA and other emissions
 Frequency of tropical data sources  Estimate possible increase or
cyclones decrease in CO2 emissions for
 Climate change projections both with and without the project
scenario
Air Quality  Ambient concentrations of  Collect ambient air samples from pre-  Obtain data on typical dust and
TSP, SOx, NOx, PM10, etc. identified sampling stations gaseous emissions from
 Submit samples to third-party construction equipment and
environmental laboratory for analysis machinery from published and
of parameters unpublished sources
 Compare results to National Ambient  Predict contribution of gaseous
Air Quality Guideline Values and dust emissions to ambient air
quality
 Assess project impacts to air
quality during project operation
Noise  Noise levels  Measure noise levels using handheld  Obtain data on typical noise
noise level meter in identified emissions from construction
sampling stations equipment and machinery and
predict how these will affect the
neighboring communities during
the construction phase
 Obtain data on typical noise
emissions from train operations
and predict how this will affect
the surrounding communities
during the operation phase
People  Demography  Conduct literature survey of relevant  Predict project impacts on the
 Settlement and population documents from the regional, host communities particularly to
distribution provincial, city/municipal and the vulnerable sectors (poor
 Population growth rate barangay LGUs including previous residents, children, women,
 Number of households and feasibility studies senior citizens, indigenous
household size by barangay  Conduct a quick demographic peoples, if any)
 Summary of demographic analysis of the project areas  Predict the economic impacts of
data per barangay to be  Identify the dominant economic the project during the
directly affected focusing on activities and land ownership/land construction and operation
land area, population, access modes especially of phases
population density, main communities in the proposed project  Predict the project impacts on
sources of income, gender sites and how they will be affected by utilities (water, power,
and age composition, the project communication) and determine
literacy, highest educational  Gather relevant cultural and historical the possibility of competition for
attainment, and employment information on current inhabitants, these resources
status informal settlers, and indigenous  Predict the project impact on
 Household profile based on peoples, if any traffic conditions during the
results of socio-  Locate the project within the regional construction and operation
economic/perception survey (NCR and CALABARZON), city/ phases
municipality and barangay  Assess the project impacts on
development plans community dynamics, particularly
 Identify project stakeholders the possibility of the disruption of
especially private property and communities, due to the
business owners, informal settlers, construction of infrastructure

5
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Baseline Data Requirements Approach/Methodology


Parameter (Annex 2-7A) Baseline Characterization Impact Assessment
poor communities, vulnerable sectors  Predict the project impacts on
(children, women, senior citizens, historical and cultural resources
PWDs, etc.) for possible relevant during the construction and
inputs and insights towards the operation phases
project  Predict the possible project
 Rapid scanning of land resource impacts on public health and
utilization and resettlement occupational health and safety
management policies, projects and  Assess the possibility of
programs related to the project occurrence of traffic accidents
 Conduct barangay consultations and during the construction phase
city/municipal level scoping meetings
Traffic  Transportation/traffic  Existing traffic condition on major  Traffic impact during project
situation roads along the project alignment construction

1.2.4 Public Participation


The following public participation activities were conducted for this EIA study.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-4. Public Participation Activities for the EIA of the LRT 6
Project.
Public Participation No. of
Date Participant/s
Activity Participants
 Parañaque City Hall – Office of the Mayor 16
 Barangay San Antonio, Parañaque City
 Barangay San Isidro, Parañaque City
24 October 2018  Barangay San Dionisio, Parañaque City
 Barangay Sto. Nino, Parañaque City
 Barangay La Huerta, Parañaque City
 Barangay BF Homes, Parañaque City
 Parañaque City Mayor Edwin Olivarez 2
25 October 2018
 Office of the City Administrator, Muntinlupa City
 Dasmariñas City Mayor Elpidio Barzaga and City Administrator 2
26 October 2018
Aisa Sango
06 November 2018  Office of the City Administrator, Las Piñas City 1
 Muntinlupa City Mayor Jaime Fresnedi 20
 Muntinlupa CPDO Noel Cardona
Courtesy visits, key  Barangay Sucat, Mujntinlupa City
12 November 2018
informant interviews,  Barangay Alabang, Muntinlupa City
focus group  Barangay Ayala Alabang, Muntinlupa City
discussions and IEC  Barangay Cupang, Muntinlupa City
campaign  Bacoor CPDO Engr. Jesus Francisco 10
 Office of the Bacoor City Administrator
14 November 2018  Bacoor Barangay Affairs Office
 Barangay Talaba IV, Bacoor City
 Barangay Molino III, Bacoor City
 Barangay Molino VI, Bacoor City 17
 Bacoor City Traffic Management Department
15 November 2019  Barangay Molino IV, Bacoor City
 Barangay Niod III, Bacoor City
 Barangay Molino I, Bacoor City
 Barangay San Nicolas III, Bacoor City 18
 Barangay Bayanan, Bacoor City
16 November 2019  Barangay Molino II, Bacoor City
 Barangay Ligas III, Bacoor City
 Barangay San Nicolas II, Bacoor City

6
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Public Participation No. of


Date Participant/s
Activity Participants
 Barangay San Nicolas I, Bacoor City
 Barangay Ligas II, Bacoor City
 Barangay Cupang, Muntinlupa City 11
19 November 2018
 Barangay Alabang, Muntinlupa City
 Office of the City Administrator and City Planning and 3
27 November 2018
Development Office, Las Piñas City
 Dasmariñas City Mayor Elpidio Barzaga, City Administrator Aisa 12
Sango and City Assessor Engr. Mildred Laudato
 Barangay Salawag, Dasmariñas City
28 November 2018
 Barangay Paliparan III, Dasmariñas City
 Barangay Paliparan II, Dasmariñas City
 Barangay Paliparan I, Dasmariñas City
 IEC presentation for Las Pinas City LGU and barangay officials 30
04 December 2018  Barangay Paliparan II, Dasmariñas City
 Barangay Paliparan, Dasmariñas City
 City Planning and Development Officer 47
 Representatives from the City Engineering Office and City Traffic
Management Office
 Representatives from six host barangays
18 February 2019
 Representatives from homeowners associations along project
Parañaque City
alignment
 Representatives from medical and educational institutions
 Representatives from business sector
 EMB NCR representative
 LGU representatives from the Mayor’s Office, Sangguniang 66
Panlungsod members, City Planning Office, City Engineering
Office, Barangay Affairs Office and Traffic Management
19 February 2019 Department
(9:00 – 11:00AM)  Representatives from 9 out of 13 impact barangays
Bacoor City  Representatives from medical and educational institutions
 Representatives from homeowners associations,
 Representatives from the business sector
 Representatives from transport groups
Public scoping  LGU representatives (City Vice Mayor, Sangguniang Bayan 31
19 February 2019 members, City Traffic Management Bureau)
(1:30 – 3:30 PM)  Representatives from three out of four impact barangays
Dasmariñas City  Representatives from educational institutions
 Representatives from the business sector
 LGU representatives from the City Administrator, City Planning 55
Office, some members of the city council, City Engineering Office
20 February 2019 and Traffic Management Bureau
(9:00 – 11:30AM)  Representatives from seven out of eight host barangays
Las Piñas City  Representatives from medical and educational institutions
 Representatives from the business sector
 Representatives from transport groups
 LGU representatives from the city council, City Planning Office, 32
City Engineering Office, Traffic Management Department and
Public Information Office
20 February 2019
 Representatives from one out of four impact barangays
(1:30 – 3:30 PM)
 Representatives from medical and educational institutions
Muntinlupa City
 Representatives from the business sector
 Representatives from the Parañaque and Muntinlupa City Police
Departments
Perception Survey 87
25-27 April 2019  Project affected stakeholders along the project alignment
and key informant

7
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Public Participation No. of


Date Participant/s
Activity Participants
interviews
Table 1-5 presents the summary of issues and concerns raised during the IEC activities while Table 1-6
presents the analysis of stakeholder perception during the IEC activities. Table 1-7 presents the summary of
issues and concerns raised during the public scoping sessions.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-5. Summary of Issues and Concerns raised during the IEC
Activities.
Las
Issues and Concerns Parañaque Muntinlupa Bacoor Dasmariñas
Piñas
Project Description
Project stage and completion date  
Project alignment has sharp curves  
No problem with project alignment since structure is 
elevated and will be built on center island
Why is project alignment off the road?  
Why does alignment not pass through Aguinaldo 
Highway?
Exact location of project alignment  
Constructing piers on road will decrease road width  
Consider electricity posts on both sides of the road 
Structure might collapse on houses 
Consider other infrastructure and development projects in   
the city
Air
Noise impact especially at night  
People
Officials were already aware about the project  
LGU welcomes the project     
Jeepney operators and drivers associations, business     
establishments, subdivisions and affected schools should
be invited to the public scoping
Expansion of business opportunities is foreseen 
Increased daytime foot traffic and business activity is 
expected
Traffic impact during construction is expected     
Project will ease traffic problem    
Subsequent road widening will affect houses along the  
road
Avoid ROW acquisition on private properties 
Will project contribute to barangay IRA? 
Project will shorten travel time to Metro Manila 
Rerouting will be necessary during construction 
Access of residents will be hampered during construction 
Others
Project will improve transport system   
Proper spoils management during construction 
Project will augment needed road infrastructure  
No major negative impact is foreseen  
The consultant and proponent representatives were able to talk to a total of 127 stakeholder representatives
mostly from LGU offices of the five host cities and 35 host barangays during the IEC. Among the five host cities,
all except Muntinlupa were already aware about the project through information disseminated by the project
proponent. All host barangays in Parañaque City were already aware about the project but the host barangays of
other host cities were not yet aware about the project alignment. All the representatives of the host cities and

8
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

barangays welcome the project and are eagerly awaiting project implementation to ease traffic congestion in
their areas (Table 1-6). Issues and concerns raised during the IEC are summarized in Table 1-7. Stakeholders
foresee no major negative impacts from the project.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-6. Analysis of Stakeholder Perception during the IEC
Awareness about Source of Do you want project to
Stakeholder No. of
the Project Information proceed?
Representative Respondents
Yes No Yes No
Parañaque City LGU 3  Proponent 
Barangay San Antonio 3  Mayor’s Office 
Barangay San Isidro 3  Mayor’s Office 
Barangay San Dionisio 3  Mayor’s Office 
Barangay Sto. Nino 2  Mayor’s Office 
Barangay La Huerta 1  Mayor’s Office 
Barangay BF Homes 1  Mayor’s Office 
Muntinlupa City LGU 4  
Barangay Sucat 2  
Barangay Alabang 2  
Barangay Ayala Alabang 3  
Barangay Cupang 9  
Bacoor City LGU 5  Proponent 
Barangay Talaba IV 2  
Barangay Molino III 5  
Barangay Molino VI 9  
Barangay Molino IV 3  
Barangay Niog III 2  
Barangay Molino I 2  
Barangay San Nicolas III 4  
Barangay Bayanan 2  
Barangay Molino II 2  
Barangay Ligas III 2  
Barangay San Nicolas II 2  
Barangay San Nicolas I 3  
Barangay Ligas II 3  
Las Piñas City LGU 3  Proponent 
Host Barangays 30  
Dasmariñas City LGU 3  Proponent 
Barangay Salawag 2  
Barangay Paliparan III 1  
Barangay Paliparan II 3  
Barangay Paliparan I 3  
127

Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-7. Summary of Issues and Concerns Raised during the City
Level Public Scoping Meetings
Issues and Concerns Parañaque Bacoor Dasmariñas Las Piñas Muntinlupa
Project Description
Provision of technical documents/exact project alignment so    
stakeholders can determine project impacts to their areas
Consideration of climate change in project design 
Expected start of project construction and length of construction     
period; simultaneous construction?
Proper waste management during construction  
Interconnection of LRT-6 with other railway projects  
Acquisition of right of way in private properties 
Timing of project implementation should consider other   

9
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Issues and Concerns Parañaque Bacoor Dasmariñas Las Piñas Muntinlupa


infrastructure projects in the area
Aesthetic aspects of project 
Conflict with other planned infrastructure projects and   
coordination with concerned agencies
Roads along project alignment are narrow; road widening should    
be done to accommodate this project as well as other
infrastructure projects
Compatibility of project with Comprehensive Land Use Plan  
Presence of station near Bacoor City Hall and accessibility of 
stations to LRT users
Provision of public transportation terminal in selected or all LRT  
stations
Project alignment on major roads and private properties  
Construction of project on the shoreline rather than busy roads 
Observation of proper road setback in anticipation of the project 
and other road infrastructure projects
Underground railway instead of overhead railway  
Land
Seismic analysis to determine location of active faults 
Water
Liquid waste management during construction 
Disallow squatting on waterways traversed by the project to 
avoid flooding and drainage concerns
Air
Project impacts on noise, vibration, air quality    
People
Hampered access of residents and business establishments  
during project construction and operation
Compensation of damage to public and private roads and public 
infrastructures
Livelihood displacement  
Mass transportation as solution to traffic problems but affected 
stakeholders will have to bear with the inconvenience during
construction
Conduct survey to identify major traffic issues that should be 
addressed during project construction
Submission of Traffic Impact Study and Traffic Management   
Plan to LGU
Roads along project alignment are very busy and used by     
several residents as well as schools and business
establishments
Regular information dissemination and consultation regarding  
project timelines and schedules
Others
Relocation of informal settlers in existing roads that can be used 
as alternate access of residents during construction phase
Construction of bridge over Laguna Lake to connect southern 
and northern parts of Metro Manila bypassing EDSA, C-5 and
other busy roads
Technical impact of project such as on drainage, sewer lines,
vibration, noise, sound, magnetic intervention, etc.
Conduct IEC for each impact barangay to let everyone know 
about the project
Creation and operation of MMT  
Non-compensation of private property owners whose properties 
were affected by road construction in Paliparan 1, 2 and 3
Discussion of issues raised during Public Scoping in Technical 
Scoping

10
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Issues and Concerns Parañaque Bacoor Dasmariñas Las Piñas Muntinlupa


Project impact on private business development plans 
Information sharing on LGU social media platform 
1.3 EIA Summary
1.3.1 Summary of Alternatives
Siting
LRT Line 6 was originally intended as the Phase 2 of the LRT-1 South Extension from Niog Station in Bacoor
City to Governor’s Drive Station in Dasmariñas City passing through Aguinaldo Highway. The proposed project
which consists of four separate alignments that will connect southern Metro Manila with Cavite Province as well
as the eastern and western sections of Parañaque City and Muntinlupa City will provide an alternative
connection between the southern cities of Metro Manila and the northern cities of Cavite Province. LRT Line-6A
which will pass through Bacoor Boulevard, Molino-Paliparan Road and on privately controlled properties was
chosen as the alignment of the LRT-1 south extension since it will provide wider space for construction
compared to the limited space along Aguinaldo Highway which is further constrained by the presence of 69kV
transmission lines that will create an obstacle when using cranes during the erection of pre-fabricated I-girders.
The other project alignments which are located in the cities of Parañaque, Las Piñas and Muntinlupa are
experiencing rapid development through the establishment of commercial centers and housing projects whose
residents commute to Metro Manila daily for work and other business. The rapid development in these areas
have resulted in traffic congestion along major road networks and this project is seen as one of the best transport
alternatives that can alleviate the traffic condition in these areas.
In terms of natural hazards, the project sites are susceptible to ground shaking along with the rest of the country
that is located within the Philippine mobile belt. The nearest seismic generator to the project site is the West
Valley Fault and PHIVOLCS has assessed the proposed LRT 6 stations to be safe from ground rupture. The
eastern and western sections of LRT Line-6C and the northern segment of LRT Line-6A were assessed to have
moderate to high susceptibility to liquefaction hazards while the western segment of LRT Line-6B+C and the
northern segment of LRT Line-6A are within the tsunami inundation zone.
In terms of right of way (ROW) issues, land acquisition is foreseen in certain sections of LRT Line-6B located
within Parañaque and Las Piñas cities. The project proponent is expected to acquire affected properties
according to local and international guidelines on ROW acquisition for infrastructure projects.
Technology Selection
The horizontal and vertical alignments as well as the routes of the proposed project minimized land acquisition
issues and impacts along the routes. The project also aimed to reduce initial investment costs as well as
operation and maintenance costs; provide a fast, convenient, safe and comfortable service to users; and
connectivity of the project to other transport modes and railway lines.
To reduce initial investment costs, the LRT Line 6 alignments will be elevated except for sections within privately
controlled properties which will be on embankment. The use of ballasted track type will also help reduce initial
investment costs although the final selection will be done during the detailed engineering design stage.
The elevated structures will be designed to comply with the minimum vertical clearance requirement of DPWH
and will be consistent with the latest version of Philippine and international standards on infrastructure and
transportation development.

1.3.2 Summary of main impacts and residual effects after applying mitigation
The main impacts of the proposed project as well as the proposed mitigation/enhancement measures are
summarized in the matrix below. During the pre-construction and construction phases, the main project impacts

11
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

include ROW acquisition along the alignment of LRT Line-6B, noise and dust generation, and traffic congestion
in project segments where construction activities are taking place. During project operation, the project will help
alleviate the worsening traffic conditions in the host cities since it will provide an alternative transport option for
residents to and from Metro Manila.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-8. Summary of Key Environmental Impacts and
Environmental Management Plan
Environmental
Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measures Residual Impacts
Component
Pre-Construction/Construction
Change in existing land use along Final project alignment should be communicated to None
project alignments host LGUs to ensure that the project will be
considered in the land use and zoning plans of host
cities.
Potential conflicts with other PAVI should coordinate with concerned agencies None
government and private infrastructure such as DPWH and the host LGUs
projects
ROW acquisition will be necessary in Project design should aim to minimize ROW This is a residual
Land use and some sections of the project acquisition and if is inevitable, ROW acquisition project impact. Proper
classification alignment should be done according to existing local and compensation should
international guidelines on ROW acquisition. A be provided to
resettlement action plan should be prepared in affected residents and
consultation with project affected persons and host business owners to
LGUs and concerned government agencies minimize this impact.
Project can affect visual aesthetics Installation of fence or screens to cover the None
and devaluation of land value can construction site will minimize negative visual
occur if construction sites are not impacts. Unnecessary equipment and other
managed properly materials should be removed from the site.
Project will be prone to seismic Proper engineering design in accordance with the The risk of seismic
hazards such as groundshaking, results of the geotechnical study and the hazards will remain
liquefaction and tsunami requirements of the National Building and with or without the
Structural Code of the Philippines; footings and project. This should be
foundations must consider the peak acceleration addressed by proper
Geology
for worst case earthquake scenarios engineering design.
Change in subsurface/ underground Monitoring of changes in geological subsurface None
geomorphology including rock formations or soil/sand
characteristics and cracks that may have significant
implications on design and integrity of the structure
Soils Unprotected excavated soils can be Soils and construction wastes should be covered None
washed off during heavy rains appropriately; topsoil should be secured and stored
properly for later reuse during revegetation
Loss of habitat and habitat Green spaces should be maintained during the None
fragmentation due to vegetation construction phase. Vegetation clearing should be
removal along project alignment kept to a minimum and done only when necessary
Removal of vegetation cover can Plants that will be lost to clearing should be None
threaten the endemic plants in the salvaged by collecting seedlings and tending them
project sites in a nursery for use in revegetating the area
Terrestrial
Road kills of terrestrial fauna can Implement road safety standards when using the This is a residual
Ecology
occur during transport of construction access roads. Drivers and construction personnel project impact.
materials, personnel and machinery should be informed about policies and actions to
apply when dealing with injured terrestrial fauna
Collection of terrestrial fauna by Personnel and workers should be informed that None
construction related personnel collection of wildlife is prohibited and will be subject
to penalties provided by the law
Silt laden surface runoff from active Silt control and silt protection measures such as silt None
construction areas can drain into traps should be in place in active construction
Water Quality
nearby surface water bodies areas.
Oil and grease contamination can Oil sumps should be installed in active construction None

12
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Environmental
Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measures Residual Impacts
Component
occur due to spills and leaks from areas to minimize discharge of oil spills and leaks
construction equipment and from construction equipment, machinery and
machinery vehicles.
Dust generation will be significant in Dust suppression techniques will be applied such None
active construction areas as water application and speed restriction. Water
application should be done in 3.2 hr intervals and
speed restriction at active construction sites can
reduce fugitive dust generation. Trucks delivering
construction materials and stockpiles of
construction materials should be covered to
Air Quality and
prevent fugitive dust from escaping.
Noise
Noise disturbance will be evident in Use of mufflers and regular maintenance of None
active construction areas construction equipment, machinery and vehicles
can minimize sound levels in active construction
sites. Construction activities should be limited
during leisure hours, hours of sleep and anytime
when loud and continuous noises can affect certain
special activities
Limited displacement of residents and The proponent has a policy to limit ROW This is a residual
businesses along the project acquisition to the minimum necessary level and to project impact.
alignment abide by the ROW Acqusition Law (RA 10572) and
other pertinent laws
Elevated infrastructure may cause Design adjustments should be done to ensure that This will be a residual
overcrowding and airshed space airshed space of neighboring entities is respected project impact in
and to prevent diminution of values and alignments where
opportunities of existing buildings specially in road right of way is
narrow roads narrow.
People
The proposed project will have a Proponent should have prior coordination with the None
huge potential for job creation and will host LGUs to ensure that a certain percentage of
require the services of various types the workforce from host areas will be employed
of professionals and workers during construction and operation
Traffic congestion will occur in active Careful planning and implementation of rerouting None
construction areas schemes and traffic management including early
installation of traffic signages and multi media
announcements of construction schedules, road
closures and alternative routes
Operation
Land use and Commercial and residential Project alignment should be communicated to host None
classification development will occur in LGUs so that the project can be incorporated in the
undeveloped areas near the local land use and development plans.
proposed LRT 6 stations
Revegetation of cleared out areas Planting materials should be bird-diversity related None
along the project alignment will such as anabiong, balete, sampalok and other
improve aesthetic value and enhance native/endemic plants
its ecology
Introduction of invasive exotic species Revegetation will be done with minimal use of None
for landscaping may negatively exotic plants; nursery raised seedlings collection
Terrestrial
impact local biodiversity from the site will be used instead
Ecology
Collision of terrestrial wildlife with Personnel should be informed about policies and None
railway components actions required to apply on injured terrestrial
fauna. All incidents should be reported to DENR.
Bird strike data should be assessed to determine
points of collision and areas of high collision
incidence
Air Quality and Noise will be generated during the  Increase distance between noise source and None
Noise passage of trains and impact will be receiver
significant in areas with sensitive  Install noise barriers between noise source and
receptors such as schools and

13
EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LRT Line 6-A and Line-6B+C Project

Environmental
Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measures Residual Impacts
Component
hospitals receiver to interrupt the path of the noise
 Incorporate noise criteria in specifications and
selection of equipment
Operation of the railway infrastructure Regular and proper maintenance of railway project None
will make social services such as to ensure constinuous and uninterrupted service to
housing facilities, health care and railway users.
educational opportunities more
accessible to host and neighboring
LGUs
Huge infrastructures and Provision of adequate lighting, clear signages, None
electronically-run systems can pose functional security surveillance systems and
People
risks to public safety assignment of adequate number of security
personnel in entrance/exit points and in the
platforms
Operation of micro-businesses in the Provision of space for micro-businesses should be None
LRT stations can create jobs for local incorporated in the design of the LRT 6 stations
residents
The project can boost tourism in the Proper and regular maintenance of the railway None
host cities project will increase its positive impact to the users.

1.3.3 Risks and uncertainties relating to the findings and implications for decision making
The proposed project has very few residual impacts that are expected to persist even with the implementation of
recommended mitigating measures. These include the impacts to residents and business owners along the
project alignment whose properties will need to be acquired for the project’s ROW as well as the potential
overcrowding and loss of airshed space in roads with narrow ROWs. The proponent will aim to minimize and limit
ROW acquisition and if ROW acquisition is inevitable, affected properties will be acquired following local and
international guidelines on ROW acquisition. The proponent is expected to acquire affected properties using fair
market values.
Seismic and other natural hazards are expected to persist with or without the project implementation. The
existence of these hazards, particularly liquefaction, ground shaking and tsunami should be considered in the
project design.

14

You might also like