Globalization Theories
Globalization Theories
The global flow of media is often characterized as media imperialism. Tv, music,
books, and movies are perceived as imposed on developing countries by the
west(Cowen, 2002).
Media imperialism undermines the existence of alternative global media originating
from developing countries such as the Al Jazeera(Bielsa, 2008)and the
Bollywood(Larkin, 2003)as well as the influence of the local and regional media.
The Internet can be seen as an arena for alternative media. Cultural imperialism
denies the agency of viewers, but people around the world often interpret the same
medium(e.g.,a movie) in significantly different ways.
Global media are dominated by a small number of large corporations. As McChesney
(1999),being "extended from old media to new media, such as Microsoft, Facebook,
twitter, Google, and Apple's iTunes. As result, in the long run the Internet could end up
being less diverse and competitive. Independent Media center, associated with the
alter-globalization movement, helps to counter this trend. It disseminates information
to facilitate global participation of activists. Hacktivists extend activism to the internet
by hacking into computer programs to promote a particular cause(Juris,
2005).Ritzer(2008) claimed that in general, the Contemporary World is undergoing the
process of Mcdonaldization. It is a process by which Western societies are dominated
by the principles of fast food restaurants.
Liquid-as a state of matter,liquids are not fixed, liquidity refers to the increasing ease
of movement of people, things, information and places in the Contemporary World.
Liquid phenomena change quickly and their aspects, spatial and temporal are in
continuous fluctuation. This means that space and time are crucial elements of
globalization. In global finance, for instance changes in the stock market are a matter
of seconds. Another characteristics of liquid phenomena is that their movement is
difficult to stop.
Examples like videos uploaded on Youtube and Facebook are unstoppable once they
become viral. The Internet sensation becomes famous not only in their homeland but
to entire world. Liquid ones made a force to political boundaries more permeable to
the flow of people and things ( Cartier, 2001).This brings to what Ritzer
(2015),regarded as the most important characteristic of liquid :it "tends to melt
whatever in its path(especially solids)." The clearest example is the decline, if not
death, of the nation-state.
Liquidity and solidity are constant interaction. However, liquidity is the one increasing
and proliferating today. Therefore, the metaphor that could best describe globalization
is liquidity. Liquids do flow and this idea of flow (Appadurai, 1996;Rey and Ritzer,
2010). The literature on globalization makes use of the concept of flows.
Flows - are the the movement of people, things, places, and information brought by
the growing "porosity" of global limitations(Ritzer, 2015).The different foreign cuisines
being patronized and consumed by the Filipinos. Aside from local dishes, many of us
are fond of eating sushi, ramen, hamburger, and french fries-food introduced to us by
foreign cultures. Clearly, foods are being globalized.
Another example of flows is global financial crises. As Landler(2008)put it:"In global
financial system, national borders are porous". This means that a financial crisis in a
given country can bring ramifications to other regions of the world. An example of
which is the spread of the effects of American financial crisis on Europe in 2008.The
following are other jinds of flows that can be observed today:
poor illegal migrants flooding many parts of the world (Mosed, 2006),the virtual flow of
legal and illegal information such as blogs and child pornography, respectively, and
immigrants recreating ethnic enclaves in host countries. A concrete example is the
Filipino communities abroad and the Chinese communities in the Philippines.