3D - 2024 - Detax Freeprint
3D - 2024 - Detax Freeprint
CROWN
Facts and scientific study results
1
INDICATIONS
6. Color uniformity and colorfastness 12 Water absorption DIN EN ISO 104771) µg/mm³ < 40
8. Bond strength with luting cements 14 Shore D hardness Internal method Shore D 90
9. Flexural strength 15
Barcol hardness DIN EN 592) Barcol 54
13. Biocompatibility 19
Unless otherwise indicated, all tests have been carried out at DETAX GmbH or at SD Mechatronik GmbH in accordance with the relevant standards and
specifications.
The test designs used in the chewing simulations were created by our technology partner Flemming Dental Tec GmbH.
2 3
1. INFORMATION ABOUT THE MATERIAL AND al printers, the cleaning quality with various cleaning
FREEPRINT® CROWN is a light-curing formulation for FREEPRINT® CROWN also allows performing process- Figs. 2 and 3 show two height comparison images of
the generative production of permanent crowns, inlays, ing and post-exposure with other equipment, such as a crown in occlusal and intracoronal view, respectively.
onlays, veneers and denture teeth, as well as long-term parameter-controlled cleaning in a fully automated This is a surface comparison between the surface of
temporary bridges of medical device class IIa using DLP cleaning unit or post-exposure in an LED post-exposure the printed crown recorded by means of an optical laser
3D printing. Optimum adaptation of the material to the unit under vacuum. scanner and the original design file before printing. The
patient is ensured by a wide range of esthetically pleas- height differences are displayed in color, whereby the
ing shades in accordance with the VITA classical A1–D4 The influence of incorrectly performed processing can green color stands for very high accuracy of fit and
shade scheme, which are not affected by environmental be seen in Figure 1. The chalking that occurs, the ex- the red and blue colors for stronger deviations into
influences thanks to low water absorption. In addition posure of pigments on the surface due to loss of the the positive or negative range, respectively. The height
to its perfectly matched transparency and opacity, the organic resin matrix, during the cleaning process, is differences are by default all in a range between -20 µm Fig. 2: Surface comparison: occlusal view
material has optimum dimensional stability thanks to due to too long or aggressive cleaning. In the case of and 30 µm. Larger deviations of more than ±50 µm can
maximum flexural strength and abrasion resistance. imperfectly adjusted formulations, this can be circum- be measured only selectively and cannot be completely
To achieve these excellent characteristics, the max- ruled out in generative manufacturing processes due to
imum achievable quality and patient satisfaction, a the pixel size of the projectors and the layer thickness
completely secured and validated process is necessary. during printing, or due to artifacts during scanning.
That is why it is important to always and without excep-
tion follow the instructions for use during manufacture, Based on these comparison images, it is possible to
processing and finishing. easily and accurately check the building accuracy of
the 3D printers, as well as the quality of the cleaning
The following quick reference guide outlines the se- process.
quence of processing and finishing, which is intended
to serve as the basis for all tests and measurements
performed in this study. For more detailed information
Fig. 1: Comparison of surface conditions after cleaning
on production and finishing, please refer to the instruc-
tions for use. vented only by tedious manual cleaning, e.g. dabbing
Fig. 3: Surface comparison: intracoronal view
with cotton swabs or cloths soaked in isopropanol.
The restorations are printed in a 3D printer according to However, here special attention must be paid to the
the instructions for use and then processed as follows: fit, as this manual cleaning step does not allow easy
After removing the objects from the building plate, they and reproducible removal of the excess resin, which
are first freed from most of the excess resin with a light can lead to fitting problems in hard-to-reach areas that
stream of compressed air before being cleaned in an can be corrected only by subtractive removal of the
ultrasonic bath with isopropanol for one minute. The surface particles. These processes are not automated
support structures are then removed, and the printed and controlled, which is why automated cleaning in CERTIFIED
objects are once again cleaned of excess resin and an ultrasonic bath or in a cleaning device has distinct
VERSION
RELIABLE WWW.DETAX.COM
385 nm 405 nm
Qualification
Done
temp
crown
Q3/22
ortho
FREEPRINT®
MED
splint 2.0
supersplint
final drying with compressed air is followed by a drying The processes described here and documented in the
Q3/22
IBT
tray 2.0
tryin
phase for 30 minutes at room temperature. Post-expo- FREEPRINT® CROWN user manual have been carefully
Q2/22
PDF DOWNLOAD
model
model 2.0
FREEPRINT®
model T
sure is performed in a xenon flash unit with 2 × 2000 checked and validated. Tests were conducted to check Validation and
TEC
model WW
gingiva
cast 2.0
flashes in an inert gas atmosphere (nitrogen 4.0). the building accuracy of the material on the individu- compatibility overview
PRIMEPRINT
MED & TEC
Primeprint
(made by
DETAX)
edition: 10.05.22
4 5
2. CHEWING SIMULATION – OBJECTIVE RESULTS
The measurement of the breaking load followed the
1
TDS Trinia (https://www.bicon.com/downloads/pdf/TRINIA_Brochure_DE.pdf)
7
3. CHEWING SIMULATION – OBJECTIVE RESULTS
LONG-TERM TEMPORARY BRIDGES Similar to the requirements for a crown, bridges are also
exposed to high forces and special loads during their
All the test specimens survived the chewing sim-
ulation over one year of wearing without cracks
service life. The force that a bridge must withstand, or abnormalities. The initial average breaking load
especially at the free pontics, is very high. This force was 931 N before the chewing simulation, and
must be deflected via the connectors to the bridge the average breaking load after a wearing period
abutments, which require sufficiently stable connection of one year was 842 N. Statistically, however, the
cross sections for this purpose. results before and after the chewing simulation
are not significantly different.
In order to be able to assess and map these forces
more precisely, once more a chewing simulation is Accordingly, the degradation of the breaking load
suitable. Due to the high forces involved, it was decided by the chewing simulation is not significant, which
to test the application of the three-unit bridge with one means that material fatigue can be ruled out. In
pontic only as a long-term temporary restoration with this measurement, too, the measured values are
a wearing time of one year. also significantly above the values of human chew-
ing forces.
Fig. 6 and 7: Experimental setup of the chewing simulation for long-term temporary bridges
9
4. MARGINAL-GAP TIGHTNESS 5. ABRASION RESISTANCE
To analyze the printed restorations bonded to the two subtractively processed materials, and one fabricat- 1 0.32
Figure 9: µCT image of the cemented bridge after chewing
stumps, the test specimens were irradiated with X-rays, simulation ed material. A steel cone (30° tip angle, tip radius R1), 2 0.46
and the attenuation upon passage through the test which periodically impinges on the occlusal surface of 3 0.72
specimen was recorded. The test specimens were the crown with a vertical force of 50 N, served as the 4 0.39
gradually rotated, and the individual sectional images antagonist for the measurement. The lateral path of 5 0.62
were reassembled to form a solid model. 1.5 mm was traversed at a lateral velocity of 20 mm/s.
6 1.14
During the test, the crowns were loaded with 1.2 million
cycles at a temperature
Chewing cycles
of 37 °C, which corre- 0 240,000 480,000 720,000 960,000 1,200,000
0
Figure 10: µCT image (sectional view) of the cemented sponds to a simulation
bridge after the chewing simulation
of 5 years of wear. -0.2
FREEPRINT® CROWN
Wear in mm
printed tooth
-0.6
milled tooth
fabricated tooth
-1
Fig. 11: Comparative µCT image (sectional view) of a cemented crown before (left) and after (right) the chewing simulation -1.2
10 11
6. COLOR UNIFORMITY AND COLORFASTNESS 7. CURING DEPTH
12 13
8. BOND STRENGTH WITH LUTING CEMENTS 9. FLEXURAL STRENGTH
between the materials, but also of the margin- are suitable for luting FREEPRINT CROWN res-
® CROWN according to section 5.4 of the standard Flexural strength in MPa
al-gap tightness mentioned in Chapter 4. The bond torations and are listed in the Instructions for Use. DIN EN ISO 10477:2020.
strength between FREEPRINT® CROWN and two lut-
100
ing cements was tested according to section 5.5 of
METHOD AND MATERIAL
3M RelyX Ivoclar
DIN EN ISO 10477:2020. Unicem 2 Automix Variolink Esthetic DC
Bond Bond
Test spec- Test spec-
strength in strength in
imen imen The test specimens to be used (dimension:
METHOD AND MATERIAL
MPa MPa
FREEPRINT® CROWN
1 23.1 1 24.7
2 × 2 × 25 mm) were produced directly on a suit-
able printer and processed and post-exposed ac-
2 21.0 2 24.0
50
To this end, the two cements Variolink Esthetic DC
®
cording to instructions. Conditioning consisted of
3 19.7 3 15.8
by Ivoclar and RelyXTM Unicem 2 by 3MTM were tested water immersion for 24 hours at 37 °C to simu-
4 23.7 4 19.4
COMPETITOR
COMPETITOR
in combination with printed test specimens made of late the environment characterizing the oral cavity.
5 23.0 5 23.0
FREEPRINT CROWN. The cements were applied to the
®
Subsequently, the test specimens are loaded to failure
Ø 22.1 Ø 21.4
printed test specimens in a cylindrical geometry, and in a quasi-stationary three-point bending test at a cross-
light-cured according to the manufacturer’s instructions head speed of 1 mm/min and a gap width of 20 mm
(Fig. 13). Conditioning was performed according to the (Figure 14). The measured force is converted into the 0
standard: Dry storage of test specimens for 24 hours at corresponding flexural strength via the cross-section 1 2 3
(23 ± 2) °C followed by artificial aging in a water bath of the test specimens.
with thermal load cycling between 5 °C and 55 °C for
5000 cycles. The test specimens were loaded to failure
in the following shear test using a universal testing
machine at a constant crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.
14 15
10. WATER ABSORPTION 11. INFORMATION DENTURE TEETH/
AND SOLUBILITY DENTURE MANUFACTURE
OBJECTIVE RESULTS Production of a complete denture is a time-consuming
and complicated process when using the classical pro-
Minimum water absorption and solubility is an import- The average measured values for the water ab- duction method with powder/monomer mixtures. With
ant basis for the permanent application of FREEPRINT ®
sorption of FREEPRINT CROWN are in the range
® the denture tooth application of FREEPRINT® CROWN,
CROWN. The examination, carried out in accordance from 14 µg/mm³ to 16 µg/mm³ and thus well the dental technician now has the possibility to plan
with section 5.6 and 5.7 of the DIN EN ISO 10477:2020 below the standard specification of < 40 µg/mm³. and manufacture a denture completely digitally, which
standard, provides important findings with regard to It can be assumed that this low water absorp- has a great savings potential in terms of manufacturing
oral stability. Conclusions can be drawn about the ten- tion also exerts significantly positive effects on time. In the manufacture of the denture, it is particularly
dency to discoloration via water absorption, and about the tendency to discoloration, so that no severe important to ensure that the materials used are not
structural integrity and biocompatibility via solubility. discoloration of the objects should be evident in post-exposed after the printing and cleaning process,
the everyday life of the restorations. This has an but remain in their green state.
impact on the esthetics and color stability of the
METHOD AND MATERIAL
Fig. 15: Application of the liquid FREEPRINT® DENTURE material
incorporated restorations, which thus retain the The green state describes the state of a printed object into the cavities under yellow light
desired colors for longer. between printing and post-exposure in which polym-
For the examination, the test specimens having a height erization is not completely finished yet and functional
of 1 mm and diameter of 15 mm each were produced The resulting solubility values for FREEPRINT ® groups are still present on the surface for further reac-
according to the standard, polished to high gloss and CROWN range from 0.1 µg/mm³ to 0.4 µg/mm³ tion. This means that bonding can be carried out using
dried in a desiccator at 37 °C to constant weight. The and are thus also well below the standard speci- the liquid FREEPRINT® DENTURE material without
weight of each test specimen is recorded, and the fication, here < 7.5 µg/mm³. These excellent solu- further chemicals, such as primers or bonders, being
specimens are stored in a water bath at 37 °C for one bility values are an important indication that only required. In addition, it is possible to model the papillae
week. The second weight determination of the test a very small proportion of substances are leached and the transition to the denture teeth when bonding
specimens follows. Subsequently, the test specimens from the restorations, which could potentially have with the liquid material, which leads to further stabili-
were dried again to constant weight and balanced. The a negative impact on the structural integrity of the zation of the bond (Figs. 15–17).
calculated differences from the measured masses of material and its biocompatibility.
the individual test specimens were then related to the For more detailed manufacturing information, please
volumes of the test specimens in order to determine refer to the instructions for use. The high green strength Fig. 16: Insertion of the denture teeth and filling of possible flaws
water absorption and solubility. of the two materials, FREEPRINT ® CROWN and
DENTURE, makes this step possible, since thanks
to the high strength in this state the distortion of the
printed objects is very minimal. Production of the den-
ture teeth as a complete dental arch supports and sim-
plifies the entire process, as the two parts match each
other optimally and thus no fitting problems can occur.
16 17
12. BOND STRENGTH –
13. BIOCOMPATIBILITY
DENTURE TOOTH AND PROSTHESIS
For a material for crowns and bridges intended for long- In accordance with the MDR, not only freshly produced
OBJECTIVE RESULTS term use in the mouth, accordingly various biocompat- batches of material were used for printing the test spec-
ibility tests must be carried out pursuant to the DIN EN imens and all the tests, but also aged, repeatedly used
For the application as denture teeth, it is important to The bond strength of the measured test speci- ISO 10933-1:2020 standard, which is fundamental for and artificially stressed batches were, in order to ensure
investigate the suitable connection between the ma- mens averaged 40.6 MPa. The resulting fractures determining the biocompatibility of medical devices. stability of the formulation even during and after natural
terials used, FREEPRINT CROWN and FREEPRINT
® ®
could be ascribed to a cohesive fracture within the The indication of FREEPRINT CROWN clearly defines
®
use in production.
DENTURE as denture base material. For this purpose, denture base material. More specifically, the bond according to the standard that it is a medical device
the bonding between the two materials was examined, between FREEPRINT CROWN and FREEPRINT
® ® with a contact duration of more than 30 days (long-term The various printing systems and post-exposure devic-
which was conclusively tested in a shear test according DENTURE, bonded with the liquid FREEPRINT ® contact), which has contact with the mucosa and must es validated for FREEPRINT® CROWN have also been
to section 5.5 of DIN EN ISO 10477:2020. DENTURE, was capable of tearing portions out be tested accordingly. appropriately reviewed to offer customers the widest
of the base plate. The bond between the denture possible variety of systems and process reliability.
tooth and the denture shows a high bond strength. The evaluation begins with a chemical analysis to
METHOD AND MATERIAL identify the substances that can potentially be elut-
ed from the objects, in order to have a toxicologist
Printed cylinders made of FREEPRINT CROWN with
®
evaluate what testing is needed for the material.
a height of 2.5 mm and a diameter of 5 mm each were Test specimen Bond strength in MPa
used as test specimens, which were glued onto likewise
1 43.3
printed platelets made of FREEPRINT® DENTURE.
2 51.7
Liquid FREEPRINT® DENTURE served as the bonding
agent. Conditioning was performed according to the 3 46.9 Biocompatibility tests have been performed
standard: Dry storage of test specimens for 24 hours for FREEPRINT® CROWN in accordance with
4 29.2
the relevant standards.
at (23 ± 2) °C and artificial aging in a water bath with Acute systemic
5 31.7 toxicity for determination
thermal load cycling between 5 °C and 55 °C for 5000
Ø 40.6 of toxicity
cycles. The test specimens were then placed in a uni- (ISO 10993-11)
versal testing machine and loaded to failure with con-
Cytotoxicity for Sensitization for
tact on the cylinders at
determination of cell determination of
a constant crosshead toxicity contact sensitization
speed of 1 mm/min. (ISO 10993-5) (ISO 10993-10)
Fig. 18: Test set-up for measuring the bond strength between denture and denture tooth
18 19
DETAX GmbH, Carl-Zeiss-Str. 4,
D-76275 Ettlingen, www.detax.com
20