International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry 2023;9(4):310–314
Content available at: https://www.ipinnovative.com/open-access-journals
                                     International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry
                                                     Journal homepage: www.ijohd.org
Case Report
TADS assisted camouflage orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in a
non-growing patient- A case report
Yenika Manchanda              1 *,   Merry Goyal        1,   Sanjay Mittal        1,   Isha Aggarwal         1,
Abida Parveen 1
1 Dept. of Orthodontics, Bhojia Dental College & Hospital, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, India
ARTICLE INFO                                  ABSTRACT
Article history:                              Background: In individuals with Class II malocclusions, there is an anteroposterior discrepancy
Received 11-08-2023                           between the maxillary and mandibular dentitions, which may or may not be accompanied with a skeletal
Accepted 12-12-2023                           discrepancy, the most effective treatment option to eliminate is by modified three-piece base arch combined
Available online 16-01-2024                   with TADS for simultaneous deep bite correction and en masse retraction.
                                              Aim: The present case report showcases the treatment results and biomechanics involved for en masse
                                              retraction and intrusion of anterior teeth using three-piece intrusion arch and temporary anchorage device.
Keywords:
                                              Conclusion: The modified three-piece base arch combined with TADS is effective in controlled translation
Class II malocclusion                         and intrusion of anteriors and would be a preferable mechanotherapy in low angle case with deep bite,
Three- piece intrusion arch                   proclined anteriors and Class II malocclusion.
TADS
                                              This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
                                              Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon
                                              the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under
                                              the identical terms.
                                              For reprints contact: [email protected]
1. Introduction                                                                2 malocclusions are defined as excessive tilting of the
                                                                               maxillary central incisors with overlapping labial maxillary
Class II malocclusions are generally defined as having                         lateral incisors. Sometimes both the middle and posterior
dental, skeletal and/or functional components or features.                     incisors descend lingually, and the canines overlap the labial
It should be noted that most often they show features                          lateral incisors.
simultaneously and to different degrees.
    Angle (1907) proposed a classification system based on                        Angular class II malocclusion in adults with skeletal
the relationship of mandibular first molars to maxillary                       class II contours and maxillary vertical excess is a difficult
first molars. Class II defines malocclusion as a relationship                  problem for the dentist to treat. This is because clockwise
between the mandibular teeth and the maxillary teeth                           rotation of the mandible to correct molar relationship
more than half the width of the tubercle. Angle (1907)                         after the removal of the upper molars confuses skeletal
described two types of malocclusion in class II based on the                   differences and sometimes worsens facial features. In
impression of the maxillary central incisors.                                  addition, in patients with severe gingival trauma due to
    Class II division 1 malocclusions, is defined as labial                    vertical enlargement of the maxilla, incursion of only
inclination of the maxillary incisors, increased coating,                      the maxillary anterior teeth is aesthetically inappropriate
narrow or absent maxillary arch. Vertical incisor overlap                      because the procedure worsens smile arch. Therefore, the
can range from overbite to open bite. Class II and Class                       best treatment option for patients who want to remove their
                                                                               gingival smile is the orthognathic (surgical) method. Due
    * Corresponding author.                                                    to the reluctance of some patients to undergo surgery, a
      E-mail address: 
[email protected] (Y. Manchanda).              new dental treatment is required in patients with deep bite
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.058
2395-4914/© 2023 Author(s), Published by Innovative Publication.         310
                      Manchanda et al. / International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry 2023;9(4):310–314                   311
and vertical gingival smile. This treatment is necessary to
effectively treat maxillary teeth and eliminate gingival smile
without invasive surgery.
   The skeletal anchor was recently developed to treat
severe malocclusions. Using this technique allows the
maxillary molars to move without side effects. In addition,
several reports describe the use of temporary bearing
devices to support the posterior teeth of the two arches
and to reduce the facial height of adults with osteoporosis.              Figure 1: Pre-treatment extraoral photographs
In class II malocclusionin the 1970s Burstone A partial
segment invaded the mandibular incisors and thus flattened
the Spee curve applied for. The wire used in this treatment
does not extend from the right molar to the left molar.
The Burstone (1970) invasive mechanism has three parts:
(1) posterior fixation using buccal stabilization based on
placement of posterior brackets or tubes from either side;
(2) anterior portion of fourth incisors; (3) There are inlet
springs on both sides.
   The present case report showcases the treatment results
and biomechanics involved for en masse retraction and
intrusion of anterior teeth using three-piece intrusion arch
and temporary anchorage device.                                            Figure 2: Pre-treatment Intraoral photographs
2. Case Report
A female patient of age 20 years visited the department
of Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopaedics at Bhojia
dental College, Budh Baddi with the chief complaint of
forwardly placed upper and lower front teeth. Extra oral
examination (Figure 1) showed that she had a leptoprosopic
facial form with good facial symmetry, convex profile with
posterior divergence, increased facial height, incompetent
lips, acute nasolabial angle, deep mentolabial sulcus, high
mandibular plane angle, and a non-consonant smile arc. No
signs/ symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
Intraoral examination (Figure 2) revealed as Class II molar                    Figure 3: Pre-treatment radiographs
relation on right side and Class I on left side. The vertical
relation showed deep bite (6 mm, 80%), overjet of 8 mm,
mandibular midline was coincident. Orthopantomogram
(Figure 3) showed full complements of teeth were present.        Table 1: Pre-treatment cephalometric values
The maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth presented with         Measurements                             Pre-treatment
extrusion and the deep curve of spee (3 mm). Lateral               SNA                                            90º
cephalograms showed (Figure 3) she had prognathic maxilla          SNB                                            82º
(90) and orthognathic mandible (80) with ANB (8), Wits             ANB                                            8º
(7 mm) depicting a skeletal Class II jaw bases. Patient had        Beta Angle                                     22º
a hyperdivergent growth pattern on account of Sn-Go-Gn             SN-GoGn                                        38º
(39), FMA (33) and Jaraback ratio of 66% (Table 1).                FMA                                            33º
                                                                   Jarabak ratio                                 66%
                                                                   1 to NA                                      8 mm
2.1. Treatment objectives                                          1 to SN                                       110º
To correct the inclination of upper and lower anterior             IMPA                                           99º
                                                                   Nasolabial Angle                              106º
teeth, obtain optimum overjet and overbite, to correct deep
                                                                   Upper lip to E-Line                         2.5mm
curve of spee, establish Class I molar and canine relation,
                                                                   Lower lip to E-Line                         3.5mm
improve the facial features by obtaining a straight profile
with straight divergence, a pleasing smile arc and soft tissue
312                    Manchanda et al. / International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry 2023;9(4):310–314
aesthetics.                                                       backs with a force of 200 gm was given, Finishing and
                                                                  detailing were carried out and the appliance was debonded.
2.1.1. Treatment                                                  The total treatment time was 19 months.
After analysing all diagnostic records, the patient was
treated with extractions. The maxillary and mandibular teeth
were bonded and banded with pre-adjusted 0.022” slot
MBT prescription brackets. A 0.9 mm nance palatal arch
(Figure 4) was placed to preserve the anchorage and to
prevent buccal flaring of molars. The arches were aligned
using the following sequence of arch wires; 0.016 Niti, 17
× 25 Niti, and 19 × 25 Nickel Titanium arch wires. Later
19 × 25 stainless steel archwire. After both the arches were
levelled and aligned they were followed by extraction of all
first premolars.
                                                                  Figure 6: TAD in the region distal to lateral incisor 16 mm away
                                                                  on right side and 17.5 mm away on left side
              Figure 4: Mid treatment photographs                 3. Treatment Results
                                                                  There was remarkable improvement in the patient’s
   This was followed by placement of three-piece intrusion        profile and facial aesthetics as seen in the post-treatment
arch (0.017” X 0.025” TMA with 2 mm helix was engaged             facial photographs. Facial balance, smile aesthetics, and
in auxiliary tube and placed in extracted space of 1st            lip positions were improved. (Figure 7). There was
premolar in anterior piece of intrusion arch) (Figure 5) in       intrusion and retroclination of the upper and lower
the upper arch to intrude and retract the upper incisors          incisors. Class I molar and canine relationships were
which help to attain a proper incisor inclination, overjet and    established. Overjet and overbite were improved to 0.5
overbite. Retraction force of 150 gm was given and intrusion      and 2mm respectively (Figure 8). Cephalometrically the
force of 60 gm was given This phase was continued for 1           upper incisors were retroclined from 8 mm to 1 mm
year.                                                             in relation to NA perpendicular to point A line and
                                                                  lower incisors were retroclined from 99 to 92 (IMPA)
                                                                  (Table 2). Superimposition demonstrated the treatment
                                                                  changes (Figure 9). There was a significant intrusion and
                                                                  retraction of maxillary incisors. At the end of treatment, the
                                                                  patient had reduced Interlabial gap with reduced convexity
                                                                  of face. Intraorally, 2 mm overjet, and 2 mm overbite with
Figure 5: Three-piece intrusion arch (0.017” X 0.025” TMA with    stable functional occlusion were achieved. Posttreatment
2mm [internal diameter] helix was engaged in auxiliary tube and   orthopantogram (OPG) and lateral cephalograms were taken
placed in extracted space of 1 st premolar in anterior piece of   at the end of orthodontic treatment.
intrusion arch)
    After achieving desirable intrusion and retraction three-
piece intrusion arch was removed and placement of
temporary anchorage device in the region distal to lateral
incisor 16 mm away on right side and 17.5 mm away on left
side was done (Figure 6). 50 gm intrusive force was added
via hooks made between 11, 12 and 21, 22 to prevent buccal
flaring with intrusion of incisors. This resulted in intrusion
of incisors and for canine retraction continuous active tie                Figure 7: Posttreatment extraoral photographs
                       Manchanda et al. / International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry 2023;9(4):310–314                    313
                                                                   but relative invasiveness in the growth stage and absolute
                                                                   invasiveness in the nongrowth stage is allowed. For
                                                                   patients with anterior incisors, our central arch suppression
                                                                   mechanism can perform overbite correction and gap closure
                                                                   at the same time. The force system applied to the front
                                                                   depends on the point and direction of application of the
                                                                   input force.
                                                                       This segmented approach to intrusion and retraction was
                                                                   developed because it allows simultaneous control of tooth
         Figure 8: Post-treatment intraoral photographs            movement in the vertical and anteroposterior planes. 2 The
                                                                   equipment has low load bias to ensure stable input power
                                                                   and low power consumption. The design of the device
                                                                   allows the therapist to provide static control with minimal
                                                                   chair adjustments. Article (2008) evaluated the effect of
                                                                   Spee mechanics’ augmentation and inversion curves on root
                                                                   resorption of incisors and found that the invasive approach
                                                                   caused more root resorption than the control group.
                                                                       In contrast, Costopoulos and Nanda (1996) found that
                                                                   infestation was only negligible due to root resorption. The
                                                                   main difference between these studies is the amount of
                                                                   force used to grip the incisor. Spee Mechanics’ reverse
                                                                   projection curve provides an interference force of 100 to
                                                                   150 g, while Burstone’s interference arc is only 15 g per
                                                                   maxillary incisor. 3–5
                                                                       El Aouame, et al. (2023) present clinical data of 3
Figure 9: Post treatment lateral cephalogram and superimposition   young patients treated and followedup for Class II Class
                                                                   1 malocclusion. Early treatment phase was applied to the
                                                                   first and second patients. The third patient was treated in
Table 2: Post-treatment cephalometric values                       two stages when his teeth were mixed. They concluded that
 Measurements              Pre-          Mid           Post        there was no significant difference between the two methods
                        treatment    treatment      treatment      (one-stage or two-stage). Early treatment of malocclusion is
 SNA                        90º          89º            89º        important because it normalizes the structure and growth of
                            82º          80º            80º        bones and shortens the duration of subsequent treatment. 6
 ANB                         8º           9º            9º
                                                                       Review process overview to better understand what
 Beta Angle                 22º          26º            27º
                                                                   is important or new 4 Draws conclusions from different
 SN-GoGn                    38º         38.5º          38.5º
 FMA                        33º          30º            38º
                                                                   studies; this is particularly important in TAD because a
 Jarabak ratio             66%          62%           60.6%        large database of simulations is available to describe clinical
 1 to NA                   8mm          7 mm           1mm         outcomes and inform clinical decisions. There are, but
 1 to SN                   110º         107º            98º        not included in the review of more familiar interventions
 IMPA                       99º         101º            92º        focused on randomized clinical trials. It is clear from this
 Nasolabial Angle          106º          98º            97º        study that the use of TAD can be effective and efficient,
 Upper lip to E-Line     2.55mm         4 mm          4 mm         but the data support the advantages of TAD over non-TAD
 Lower lip to E-Line      3.5 mm       5.5 mm          5mm         anchors. 7
                                                                       Mahmood (2023) conducted a retrospective study of
                                                                   40 cephalometric interpretations of patients scheduled for
                                                                   fourunit extraction. All patients received the McLaughlin
4. Discussion
                                                                   Bennett Trevis (MBT) treatment, a temporary anchor device
Absolute incursion, relative incursion and posterior               (TAD) with the same protocol, in the same orthodontic
extrusion are the three overbite treatments. Relative              clinic, including 22 holes and onestep retraction after
intrusion is achieved by preventing eruption of the lower          four units of extraction. While the inclination of the
incisors where posterior growth provides vertical space            occlusal plane does not change significantly, all tissues
for posterior eruption, and during posterior extrusion             related to cephalometric values are reduced according to
the mandible rotates downward and backward without                 the relationship of the upper and lower lip part for the
eruption. 1 As a general rule, extrusion is undesirable,           Ricketts aesthetic line (ELine), except for the nasolabial
314                   Manchanda et al. / International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry 2023;9(4):310–314
angle is reduced. For both the Frankfurt mandibular              6. Source of Funding
angle and the Frankfurt level, the upper incisor was not
                                                                 None.
significantly associated with the change in posttreatment
contour. Therefore, the use of MBT therapy in combination
with TAD-based reversal is a good method in the treatment        7. Conflict of Interest
of complications.                                                None.
    A recurring theme in the results is the relationship
between the position of the dental guard and the                 References
maxillary/mandibular arch, and the relationship between
                                                                  1. Mulligan TS. Common sense mechanics. J Clin Orthod. 1980;14:855–
the effect of TAD action and the point of force                      86.
application. 8,9 Position of the TAD The point of application     2. Shroff B, Lindauer SJ, Burstone CJ, Leiss JB. Segmented approach
in threedimensional space will create a force vector (eg,            to simultaneous intrusion and space closure: Biomechanics of the
                                                                     three-piece base arch appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
the nasolabial angle) that causes the occlusal plane to
                                                                     1995;107(2):136–43.
rotate and affects the teeth, body relationship, and soft         3. Nanda R. The differential diagnosis and treatment of excessive
tissues of the face. Understanding the complex interactions          overbite. Dent Clin North Am. 1981;25(1):69–84.
described here is important so that clinicians can distinguish    4. Burstone CJ. The integumental contour and extension patterns. Angle
                                                                     Orthod. 1959;29:93–104.
between TAD position and number and select the right              5. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition.
application to achieve the desired tooth and reduction.              Acta Odontol Scand. 1977;35:297–303.
Orthodontists should consider these factors when planning         6. Aouame AE, Bouchghel L, Khamlich K, Quars FE. Management of
TAD placement and include biomechanics to minimize                   Class II Malocclusion in Children and Adolescents: A Case Report.
                                                                     Open Access Library Journal. 2023;10:1–14.
adverse consequences. 3 Wenxin Lu, Yuan Li, Li Mei, Yu Li         7. Burstone CJ. Rationale of the segmented arch. Am J Orthod.
(2023) conducted a study to evaluate masquerade treatment            1962;48:805–22.
with extraction of fourth premolars in patients with severe       8. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th
divergent skeleton class II; this was achieved using vertical        ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007.
                                                                  9. Steenbergen EV, Burstone CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Aartman IHA. The
using TAD. Successful and easily with prefabricated IBs              influence of force magnitude on intrusion of the maxillary segment.
of clear aligners. 10 Evaluated a study in which both                Angle Orthod. 2005;75(5):723–9.
maxillary first premolars were removed and the cavity            10. Lu W, Li Y, Mei L, Li Y. Preformed intrusion bulbs on clear aligners
was closed using a closed coil spring and elastic chain.             facilitate active vertical control in a hyperdivergent skeletal Class II
                                                                     case with extraction: A case report with 4- year follow-up. APOS
Correction of excessive closures using ISW curves and ISW            Trends Orthod. 2023;13(1):46–54.
compression belts. The elastic band of the chin is used to       11. Braun S, Sjursen RC, Legan HL. On the management of extraction
correct the relationship between the chins. Treatment takes          sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112(6):645–55.
                                                                 12. Xu TM, Zhang X, Oh HS, Boyd RL, Korn EL, Baumrind S.
approximately 3 years with improvement in appearance
                                                                     Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage
and dental health. It was concluded that the case of deep            with 2 retraction techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
overbite with skeletal class II malocclusion was treated with        2010;138(5):544–5.
the ISW technique with good results and the patient was          13. Thiruvenkatachari B, Ammayappan P, Kandaswamy R. Comparison
                                                                     of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and
satisfied with the results. It should also be known that the         titanium implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
mechanical process changes when tooth movement occurs                2008;134(1):30–5.
and therefore it should be checked periodically during
treatment. This study explores the use of force for TAD-
based orthodontic intervention to better understand how to       Author biography
provide the necessary force to achieve effective orthodontic
tooth movement while remaining within the confines of the        Yenika Manchanda, PG Student             https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-
bones. Global retraction of anterior teeth and use of TAD        4630
intrusion are currently the two most studied topics. 3–5,11,12
                                                                 Merry Goyal, Reader       https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7098-5496
5. Conclusion                                                    Sanjay Mittal, Professor & Head          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7125-
                                                                 0424
The three-piece intrusion arch combined with TADS
improves Class II malocclusion in different stages of
                                                                 Isha Aggarwal, Professor      https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-2579
dentofacial development. This study provided a better
understanding of the complex interactions and has provided       Abida Parveen, Senior Lecturer      https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2964-2894
a guide to the level and direction of forces in each type
of intervention to aid clinicians in achieving high quality
outcomes. 13                                                      Cite this article: Manchanda Y, Goyal M, Mittal S, Aggarwal I,
                                                                  Parveen A. TADS assisted camouflage orthodontic treatment of class II
                                                                  malocclusion in a non-growing patient- A case report. Int J Oral Health
                                                                  Dent 2023;9(4):310-314.