0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views28 pages

Chapter 1 - Theoretical Perspectives in Conducting Research

Uploaded by

stheskosana14
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views28 pages

Chapter 1 - Theoretical Perspectives in Conducting Research

Uploaded by

stheskosana14
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

Chapter 1

Business research
approaches
Influences on business research
The role of theory in research

• Which comes first? Theory or research?


• Should we examine a problem and try to
work out how it is caused and how it might
be solved (inductive reasoning)?
• Or should we take a generally accepted
theory of how things work and find
evidence for it in the problem we examine
(deductive reasoning)?
The nature of business research

• Business research does not exist in a


bubble in a world apart from the sciences –
it is integrated with them
• The variety and diversity of business and
management studies makes it hard to find
agreement on how business research
claims should be evaluated
• Perhaps it can only be seen as an ‘applied
field’ because it is concerned with solving
management problems
The nature of business research
(continued)
• Academic researchers add to theory
“supported by bits of practice” and
management consultants contribute to
practice “backed by bits of theory”
(Gummesson, 2000)
Page 4
Evidence-based management

• Is the systematic use of the best available


evidence to improve management practice
(Reay, Berta and Kohn, 2009)
• Concept developed to reduce variation in
(clinical) practice
• Information comes, in part, from the
expertise and judgement of managers
working in individual firms
Key concept 1.1
Page 5
Knowledge is produced in two
modes
Mode 1 Mode 2
• Traditional, • Involves academics,
university-based policy-makers and
• Academic audience practitioners
• Pure and applied • Trans-disciplinary
• Built upon existing • Related to context (not
knowledge easily replicated)
• More linear process • Less linear process
• Limited emphasis on • More emphasis on
dissemination dissemination and
exploitation
Theories come at two levels

Grand theories Middle-range theories


• Structural- • Strategic choice
functionalism • Trait theory
• Symbolic • Contingency theory
interactionism • Labour process theory
• Critical theory – Middle-range theories
• Poststructuralism typically guide business
research
• Structuration theory
Deductive and inductive theory

• Deductivism:
– Theory -> data
– Explicit hypothesis to be accepted or rejected
– Quantitative research
• Inductivism:
– Data -> theory
– Generalised inferences based on observations
– Qualitative research/grounded theory
Page 9
The process of deduction
Knowledge and reality

• How do we know the things we know?


Because we read about them in
newspapers , or we learned them at
school? Should we make important
decisions based on this kind of knowledge
or should we do some research?
• These kinds of questions are part of the
study of Epistomology.
Knowledge and reality (continued)

• Do businesses and organisations exist


independent of the people who work in
them? Can you capitalism without
capitalists?
• These kinds of questions are part of the
study of Ontology
Epistemological considerations

• What is (or should be) considered


acceptable knowledge?
• Can the social or business world be studied
scientifically?
• Is it appropriate to apply the methods of the
natural sciences to social or business
research?
• Positivism and interpretivism
Page 12
Positivism

• Application of natural science methods to


social science and business research
• Phenomalism – knowledge via the senses
• Deductivism – theory testing
• Inductivism – theory building
• Objective – value-free researcher
• Distinction between scientific and
normative statements
Key concept 1.3
Page 12
Interpretivism

• Denotes alternative to the Positivism


orthodoxy that has held sway for decades
• Based upon the view that a strategy is
required that respects the differences
between people and the objects of the
natural sciences and requires the
researcher to grasp the subjective
meaning of social action
Interpretivism (continued)

• Intellectual heritage includes Weber’s


notion of Verstehen, hermeneutic-
phenomenological tradition, and symbolic
interaction
Ontological considerations

• Social ontology: nature of social entities


• What kind of objects exist in the world?
• Do social entities exist independently of our
perceptions of them?
• Is social reality external to social actors or
constructed by them?
Page 16
Objectivism

• Objectivism is an ontological position that


asserts that social phenomena and their
meanings have an existence that is
independent of social actors.
• It implies that social phenomena and the
categories that we use in everyday
discourse have an existence that is
independent or separate from actors
Key concept 1.6
Page 17
Constructionism

• Also referred to as constructivism


• Social phenomena and their meanings are
continually being generated by social
actors
• Social phenomena and categories are
produced through social interaction
• Social phenomena and categories are in a
constant state of revision
Constructionism (continued)

• Researchers' own accounts of the social


world are constructions
• Knowledge is viewed as indeterminate
Page 17
What is the role of a paradigm

• Paradigms are a cluster of beliefs and


dictates that influence:
– What should be studied
– How research should be done
– How results should be interpreted.
• Social science consists of competing
paradigms
Page 19
Social paradigms
Multiple paradigms used in research

• Functionalist
– Survey of job motivation
• Interpretative
– Conversational data on work routines
• Radical humanist
– Descriptive analysis of management training
• Radical structuralist
– Historical analysis of employment relations
Research in Focus 1.8
Page 20
Influences of personal values on
business research
• The personal beliefs or the feelings of
researcher affect every stage of research
process, from the choice of research area
to the interpretation of results.
• If we recognise that research cannot be
value-free, we can attempt to limit its
constraint on objectivity.
Influences of personal values on
business research (continued)
• Feminist writers (among others) argue for
consciously value-laden research, in which
the researcher empathises with the
researched and encourages reciprocity.
Page 21
Practical considerations

• May influence or determine choices on:


– research strategy
– design
– method
– resources & costs.
• May be influenced or determined by:
– nature of the topic
– people being investigated
– political acceptability.
Page 23
Criteria in business research

• Reliability – are measures consistent?


• Replication/replicability – is study
repeatable?
• Validity – are conclusions well-founded?
Page 24
Types of validity

• Measurement (or construct) validity – do


measures reflect concepts?
• Internal validity – are causal relations
between variables real?
• External validity – can results be
generalised beyond the research setting?
• Ecological validity – are findings applicable
to everyday life?
Page 25-26

You might also like