YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN MAHARASHTRA OPEN
UNIVERSITY, DNYANGANGOTRI, NEAR GANGAPUR DAM,
NASHIK 422222
MBA-GENERAL (P79)
PROFORMA FOR SYNOPSIS
(USE CAPITAL LETTERS ONLY)
PRN NO. :
2 0 1 7 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 1 8 7 8 2
1. NAME OF THE STUDENT: TAWADE HARISHCHANDRA
DATTATRAY
2. CONTACT NO. : 9922219398
3. E-MAIL ID:
[email protected].
4. STUDY CENTRE NAME : APPASAHEB R.B. GARUD COMMERCE AND
SCIENCE COLLEGE, SHENDURNI
5. STUDY CENTRE CODE: 53221
6. TITLE OF THE PROJECT:
“A STUDY OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION IN SUCCESS STEEL
STRUCTURE.. ”
7. NAME OF THE SUPERVISOR: DR. SUJATA. C. PATIL
8. SPECIALIZATION : HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.
9. ADDRESS OF THE SUPERVISOR :APPASAHEB R.B. GARUD COMMERCE
AND SCIENCE COLLEGE, SHENDURNI, JAMNER, JALGAON
EMAIL:……………………………… CONTACT NO. :9763946971
10. IS THE SUPERVISOR AN ACADEMIC YES:……… NO:…………….
COUNSELLOR OF THE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME OF YCMOU
11. IF YES, NAME OF STUDY CENTRE AND THE COURSES / HE / SHE IS
COUNSELLING FOR AND SINCE WHEN:
Signature of Student Study Center Signature of Supervisor
Date: Stamp Date:
…………………………………………Please do not forget to enclose the synopsis……………………………
1
A SYNOPSIS ON
“ A STUDY OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION IN SUCCESS STEEL
STRUCTURE. ”
SUBMITTED TO
SCHOOL OF COMMERCE AND MANAGEMENT
YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN MAHARASHTRA OPEN UNIVERSITY NASHIK.
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF
THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA)
BY
MR. TAWADE HARISHCHANDRA DATTATRAY
PRN NO. 2017017000018782
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF:
Dr. SUJATA C. PATIL
THROUGH
THE COORDINATOR
STUDY CENTRE CODE:
53221 APPASAHEB R.B. GARUD COMMERCE AND SCIENCE COLLEGE.
2
“A STUDY OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION IN SUCCESS STEEL
STRUCTURE. ”
1) INTRODUCTION:
EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION :
Employee satisfaction is in regard to one’s feeling or state of mind regarding
the nature of their work. It can be influenced by a variety of factors e.g. quality of
one’s relationships with their supervisor, quality which they work, degree of
fulfilment in their work etc. Loke give a comprehensive definition of job satisfaction
as involving cognitive, effective and evaluative research or attitudes and states it is “
a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or
job experience.” Job satisfaction is a result of employee’s perception of how well
their job provides those things that are viewed as important. Job satisfaction,
employee satisfaction or work satisfaction is a measure of workers' contentedness
with their job, whether they like the job or individual aspects or facets of jobs, such
as nature of work or supervision.Job satisfaction can be measured in cognitive
(evaluative), affective (or emotional), and behavioral components.Researchers have
also noted that job satisfaction measures vary in the extent to which they measure
feelings about the job (affective job satisfaction).or cognitions about the job
(cognitive job satisfaction) FACTORS DETERMINING EMPLOYEES
SATISFACTION Factors affecting jobs are the main factors of job satisfaction,
which may be challenging work, reward systems, working conditions, colleagues,
learning and personality. Skill variety autonomy and significance are challenging
tasks, which provide maximum satisfaction to employees. Working conditions
influence employees level of satisfaction. Under conductive working condition,
people prefer to work hard while in an adverse atmosphere people avoid work.
Working condition not only include physicals of the work but also the working
relationships in the organization. Fairness in promotion, unbiased attitude of
management, responsibilities and social status are the factors that are said to be
3
providing satisfaction to employees. The relationship between the employees and
the managers have an important bearing on job satisfaction.
2) REVIEW OF LITERATURE:
1. Warn (2003) : emphasized aspects of the workplace, contributing to depression
and lack of job satisfaction. Stress is normally caused by a lack of power over the
intended effects. At the workplace, tension is felt because of a lack of authority, job
conflicts, and uncertainty, contributing to frustration. The principle of checkability
brings a solution to lower pressures and contributes to job fulfillment in which a
person has an attitude of desires and needs that depends on the aspirations of the
individual and governs multiple facets of the working situation. A supportive working
atmosphere, such as a positive environment for studying or no abuse at work or
anxiety in the workplace, helps minimize depression and achieve job satisfaction.
2. Zaki (2003) Explains Lebanese non-management banking employees' work
satisfaction and results. The researchers found a substantial link in terms of pay and
supervision between work satisfaction and gender. Only satisfied people within the
company are willing to carry out their roles and obligations. Women workers were
happy with the salaries, while men were happier with supervision. The author himself
often claims this does not matter because the self-rate is inflated, and his colleagues'
success is usually underestimated.
3. Austin (2007) The major reasons for managers' work satisfaction in Cyprus are
"selffulfillment," "independence," and "job environment." Fair salaries, well-educated
subordinates, the prospects for self-realization are development opportunities.
Employers can reflect on the three aspects of community independence of their work
4
setting to ensure the framework's flow contributes to job satisfaction, i.e., age, sex,
number of years in the company, public and private sector, number of workers
oversaw.
4. Omey (2007) Discusses the connection between education and work satisfaction.
Although there's a relationship, he claims there's no relationship, too. In contrast with
the lower-skilled employees, higher-education workers are often happy, as they
receive a better-quality job. He continues that under-trained employees can also be
better pleased with the "good job psychological advantages. Employee quality varies
with the educational level and results in various levels of work fulfilment. Job features
play a major role, and you have the chance to use your skills. The author thus argues
that organizations should concentrate more on standards of work than education.
5. Hawley (2008) Discusses the degree and the factors impacting the teachers'
happiness in the beginning. Teachers are pleased with their jobs, and academic
proficiency, race, socio-economic status, teacher's degree, and whether their mother
was a teacher are the variables contributing to their work satisfaction. The teaching
license plays an important part here because it demonstrates the expertise and
experience that the instructor wants to be taught.
6. Silverthrone (2008) The contribution to job content and the associated effects,
such as output and tension, of the individually variable locus of control was studied.
Findings suggest that a low degree of work tension and a greater level of satisfaction
and efficiency are the product of the internal position of control. The external control
5
locus doesn't reduce work stress, while the internal control locus decreases work
stress by reducing efficiency and happiness.
7. Antvor (2010) discusses the national culture's impact on the national work
satisfaction level but discusses its role on other measures of the employment aspects
at the same time. While there was a cultural impact on domestic job satisfaction, they
claimed that all work satisfaction factors were not unique to the cultural context. The
findings of a cross-border work satisfaction survey must be compared with
management.
8. Artz (2010) Studies the relationship between rewards and work satisfaction for
Outer. Benefits from the periphery do not necessarily contribute to workplace
satisfaction. In so long as the employee has the impression that he can fulfill his
desires, it is still appropriate. It is also noticed that it does not fulfill the employee's
expectations, which contributes to discontent. Organizations need to evaluate their
processes more effectively and, if possible, provide fringe incentives and offer
workers the chance to make use of them, thereby generating satisfaction with their
work.
9. Mudor and Tookson (2011) discuss the relationship between human capital
administration, employee satisfaction, and attrition eventually. Monitoring,
recruitment, and compensation procedures, which are the three factors of HRM
practices, are extremely counterproductive to employee satisfaction. Efficient workers
lead to continuous employment and fair wages for employees. Job quality contributes
directly to turnover.
6
10. Ramayah (2011) evaluates whether mentoring results in work satisfaction within
the Malaysian context. His results suggest that career mentoring is connected to every
aspect of work satisfaction. The aspects of job satisfaction analyzed were: jobs
themselves, employees, managers, and promotion. At a higher education level,
mentors often play an important role and deliver meaningful job results directly. But
psychological mentoring has no essential connection to the three variables that fulfill
the job (co-workers, the job itself, and promotion). The study also suggests that since
therapeutic mentoring contributes to non-monetary happiness, workers would not
appreciate it in the longest possible term.
11. Nir (2012) studies the importance of teachers' perceived organizational support on
Job Satisfaction. There are two aspects to satisfaction, mainly intrinsic and extrinsic.
Earned status and respect are extrinsic factors that play an important role in employee
satisfaction. Self-efficacy, as an intrinsic factor, helps as it promotes individual
selffulfillment. When an organization value its employee's contribution and cares
about their well-being, employees are intrinsically and extrinsically satisfied.
12. Aristovnik (2014) discusses the influence of organizational and environmental
factors on employee job satisfaction. The police employees rated salary and security
as the least motivator and support from the management as high. Police employees
rate trust and belongingness as the key factor in job satisfaction.
13. Kumari and Pandey (2011) State that for any country, both the public and
private sector are equally important and these two are fundamental criteria for every
nation to thrive and expand. Here, the level of workplace satisfaction has been
7
checked for work ambivalence (the state of having mixed feelings or contradictory
ideas about something). The manager received a higher output ranking if the
ambivalence of the workers was lower and vice versa. Jobs happiness and success
have little connection if the ambivalence to the work rises. Organizations should also
concentrate on clarifying their jobs to the workers in order to properly appreciate the
task.
14. Seniwoliba A.J. (2013), analysed career quality satisfaction levels of teachers in
the public high school in Temale Metropolis in Ghana and was found to motivate
employees and contribute successfully to the achievement of job satisfaction through
factors extrinsic to pay, rewards, working conditions, protection (medical and future
pension benefits). In terms of worker satisfaction, the wages and working conditions
are greater and organisations should still concentrate on it and take steps to enhance it
by expanding. Organizations must preach fair wages for equal status.
15. Witte (2012) discussed the element of job satisfaction highlighted on group
discrepancies. The research was carried out in Belgium in the banking industry. For
the hypothesis test, a model was developed. The paradigm is "job demand
management support," and the study showed that the demand for work had the
greatest impact in explaining satisfaction in relation to working circumstances and
less in relation to explaining satisfaction with task contents. 16. Saari & Judge
(2004) discussed attitudes towards employee satisfaction, discussed the employee's
mood is linked to the job where an employee loves the job, the content level rises with
increasing the success of the company as a whole.
8
17. Singh & Jain (2013), Employee happiness and its impact on results were
highlighted. The behavior of workers represents the company's morality. The satisfied
staff has a significant role in customer care and sales because they communicate
regularly with the customer. The office is the gateway to employee fulfillment. Good
labor practices and good working conditions also improve workers' efficiency,
profitability, satisfaction, and retention.
18. Shanmugapriya. S (2016), in his study, the employees of public sector banking
opined that the state banks had a sea turn in their success in analyzing determinants of
job satisfaction. Moreover, the economic and financial market reforms have begun.
Various factors have made India one of the world's fastest-growing economies,
including opening the global markets, reforming the banking system, rising
investment levels, the proactive regulatory landscape, and its demographic profile.
There is no question, for a functioning financial environment, a safe banking sector is
important. Indian banks have good human capital and operating technologies oriented,
being the largest and most profitable domestic and global scenarios. 1
9. Neeraj Kumari (2016) pursued observational research on behavior and criteria in
the service sector against job satisfaction. The research is done with a certain
framework and observations into the life insurance scheme. Throughout the analysis,
it is found that life insurance employees are usually satisfied. The researcher stresses
the facets of incentives and financial advantages, and personal recognition, which has
a dominant function to play, factors such as the company's goals, the reputation and
credibility of the company, sustainability with the role, and the personality of the
9
employee. The researcher further suggested that managers take care of recruiting and
personnel decisions to make a constructive contribution to the human resource to
effectively aware of the organization's future needs.
CHAPTER SCHEME:
CHAPTER 1:
INTRODUCTION
1.1 COMPANY PROFILE
1.2 INDUSTRY PROFILE
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
1.4 NEED OF THE STUDY
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
CHAPTER 2:
REVIEW OF LITERTURE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 LIST OF REVIEW
2.3 REFRANCES
CHAPTER 3:
RESEARCH METHODOLOY
3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN
3.2 SAMPLE DESIGN
3.3 PERIOD OF STUDY
3.4 SAMPLE SIZE
3.5 DATA COLLECTION
3.6 QUESTIONAIRE
3.7 TOOLS USED FOR ANALYSIS
3.8 GRAPICAL REPRESENTATION OF DATA
CHAPTER 4:
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4,1 PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
4.2 SATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND HYPOTHESIS
4.3 CHI-SQARE TEST 36 4.4 NULL HYPOTHESIS
4.5 ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS
4.6 HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY
4.7 HYPOTHESIS OUTPUT
4.8 HYPOTHESIS RESULT
FINDING , SUGGESTIONS & CONCLUSION
10
CHAPTER 5:
FINDING , SUGGESTIONS & CONCLUSION
5.1 FINDING OF THE STUDY
5.2 SGGESTIONS
5.3 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
5.4 CONCLUSION
REFERENCE
APPENDIX (QUESTIONNAIRE)
REFERENCE:
www.google.com
http://www.successsteelstructures.in/about.html
Kerry Fairbrother James Warn, (2003), Workplace dimensions, stress and job
satisfaction, Journal of Managerial Psychology,18(1),8 – 21
Alf Crossman Bassem Abou Zaki, (2003),Job satisfaction and employee
performance of Lebanese banking staff", Journal of Managerial Psychology,
Vol. 18(4),368 – 376
Annabel Droussiotis Jill Austin, (2007),Job satisfaction of managers in
Cyprus, Euro Med Journal of Business,2(2),208 – 222
Elsy Verhofstadt Hans De Witte Eddy Omey, (2007), Higher educated
workers: better jobs but less satisfied? International Journal of
Manpower,28(2),135 – 151
Wei Cheng J. Mau Randy Ellsworth Donna Hawley, (2008), Job satisfaction
and career persistence of beginning teachers, International Journal of
Educational Management,22 (1),48 – 61
Jui Chen Chen Colin Silverthorne, (2008),The impact of locus of control on
job stress, job performance and job satisfaction in Taiwan, Leadership &
Organization Development Journal,29(7),572 -582
Jacob Eskildsen Kai Kristensen Henrik Gjesing Antvor, (2010),The
relationship between job satisfaction and national culture, The TQM Journal,22
(4),369 – 378
Benjamin Artz (2010), Fringe benefits and job satisfaction. International
Journal of Management ,31(6),626-644
Mudor, H. & Tookson, P. (2011), Conceptual framework on the relationship
between human resource management practices, job satisfaction, and turnover.
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies ,2(2),41-49
May Chiun Lo T. Ramayah, (2011), Mentoring and job satisfaction in
Malaysian SMEs, Journal of Management Development,30(4),427 – 440 Ronit
Bogler Adam E.Nir, (2012),The importance of teachers’ perceived
organizational support to job satisfaction. Journal of Educational
Administration,50(3),287-306
11
Nina Tomaževi# Janko Seljak Aleksander Aristovnik , (2014),Factors
influencing employee satisfaction in the police service: the case of Slovenia,
Personnel Review,43(2),209 – 227
Kumari, G & Pandey K.M. (2011). Job Satisfaction in Public Sector and
Private Sector : A Comparison. International Journal of Innovation,
Management and Technology ,2(3),202-228
Seniwoliba A.J. (2013). Teacher motivation and job satisfaction in senior high
schools in the Tamale metropolis of Ghana. Merit Research Journal of
Education and Review,1(9),181-196
Bart Cambré Evelien Kippers Marc van Veldhoven Hans De Witte, (2012),
Jobs and organizations, Personnel Review,41(2),200 – 215
Lise M.Saari and Timothy A. Judge, (2004),Employee Attitudes and Job
Satisfaction, Human Resource Management,43(4)395 – 407.
Singh, J.K & Jain, M (2013). A Study of Employees’ Job Satisfaction and its
impact on their Performance. Journal of Indian Research, 1(4), 105-111.
Shanmugapriya. S (2016) “Determinants of Job Satisfaction of Public Sector
Bank Employees”, International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern
Education (IJSRME) ISSN (Online): 2455 – 5630
(www.rdmodernresearch.com) Volume I, Issue II, 2016.
Neeraj Kumari (2016), Study of Parameters Affecting Employee Satisfaction,
in Reliance life insurance branches of New Delhi, Journal of Business and
Management Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2016, pp 34-42. [20] Crispen Chipunza,
BulelwaMalo (2017) on “Organizational culture and job satisfaction among
academic professionals at a South African university of technology”, Problems
and Perspectives in Management, 15(2), 148-161.
Sign of Research Candidate Sign of Research Supervisor
12