Kb4 Business Assurance Ethics and Audit December 2017
Kb4 Business Assurance Ethics and Audit December 2017
December 2017
(a)
Whether the interests of all parties (including affected third parties) could be
harmed if the client or employer consents to the disclosure of information by
the professional accountant.
Whether all the relevant information is known and substantiated, to the extent
that it is practicable. When the situation involves unsubstantiated facts,
incomplete information or unsubstantiated conclusions, professional
judgment shall be used in determining the type of disclosure to be made, if any.
The type of communication that is expected and to whom it is addressed.
Whether the parties to whom the communication is addressed are appropriate
recipients.
(b) According to the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants issued by CA Sri
Lanka, a professional accountant has an obligation to respect the confidentiality
of the information about the employer’s affairs. However, he can disclose such
information if he is given specific authority to disclose such facts or if there is a
legal or professional duty or right to disclose such facts. In this scenario, the
finance manager is required by law to submit such information. Therefore, he has
to submit the required information to SLAASMB.
(c)
Member of CA Sri Lanka
Registered auditor
(Total: 10 marks)
(a)
Every public company should be headed by an effective Board, which should
direct, lead and control the company.
There are two key tasks at the top of every public company – conducting the
business of the Board, and facilitating executive responsibility for the
management of the company’s business. There should be a clear division of
responsibilities at the head of the company, which will ensure a balance of
power and authority, such that no one individual has unfettered powers of
decision.
The chairman’s role in preserving good corporate governance is crucial. As the
person responsible for running the board, the chairman should preserve order
and facilitate the effective discharge of Board functions.
The Board should ensure the availability within it those with sufficient
financial acumen and knowledge to offer guidance on matters of finance.
It is preferable for the Board to have a balance of executive and non-executive
directors, such that no individual or small group of individuals can dominate
the Board’s decision taking.
The following also can be considered:
The Board should be provided with timely information in a form and
quality appropriate to enable it to discharge its duties.
There should be a formal and transparent procedure for the
appointment of new directors to the Board.
All directors should be required to submit themselves for re-election at
regular intervals, and at least once in every three years.
Boards should periodically appraise its own performance in order to
ensure that its responsibilities are satisfactorily discharged.
Shareholders should be kept advised of relevant details in respect of
directors.
The Board should be required, at least annually, to assess the performance
of the CEO.
(b)
Assist Board oversight of the preparation, presentation and adequacy of
disclosures in the financial statements, in accordance with Sri Lanka
Accounting Standards.
Assist Board oversight of the company's compliance with financial reporting
requirements, information requirements of the Companies Act and other
relevant financial reporting related regulations and requirements.
(Total: 10 marks)
(a)
There is no three-way matching of the In the absence of the three-way match, it is not
supplier invoices with the goods received possible to ensure that the invoices (goods) paid
note and the approved purchase orders. for are the same goods ordered and received. As
such, the purchases, stocks and trade payables
may be misstated.
At stores, there is no indication that staff There is no comfort that what they have received
receiving the goods check them with the is what was ordered. Transactions may be
PO approved. invalid. There is opportunity for fraud.
(b)
It should not include language that conflicts with the opinion expressed in the
auditor's report.
It should state that the accounting and internal control systems were considered
only to the extent necessary to determine the auditing procedures to report on the
financial statements, and not to determine the adequacy of internal control for
management purposes or to provide assurances on the accounting and internal
control systems.
(a)
Helps the auditor to ensure key areas more susceptible to material
misstatement are adequately investigated and tested during the audit.
Helps identify low risk areas where reduced testing may be appropriate,
thereby ensuring time is not wasted by over-testing these areas.
(d)
(Total: 10 marks)
(a)
Risk of material misstatement at the financial statement level refers to risks that
relate pervasively to the financial statements as a whole and potentially affect
many assertions. Risks of this nature are not necessarily risks identifiable with
specific assertions at the class of transactions, account balance, or disclosure level.
Rather they represent circumstances that may increase the risks of material
misstatement at the assertion level, for example, through management override
of internal controls.
(b)
Operations exposed to high competition in the market – in light of the increased
competition and the subsequent reduction in selling price, there is an increased
risk that UBL is facing going concern difficulties.
Inability to service debts on time – UBL has not been able to service its loans per
repayment schedules. This indicates constraints on the cash flows of the company.
Changes in key personnel, including departure of key executives – the financial
controller has been dismissed and his duties have been allocated between the
finance division team, which has increased their workload. This increases the
inherent and control risk within UBL as the overworked finance team members
may have made errors within the accounting records, and there is no one working
in a supervisory capacity.
Management override of controls – the directors need to reach a profit level of
Rs. 50 million in order to receive their annual bonus. There is a risk that they might
feel under pressure to manipulate the results through the judgments taken or
through the use of provisions.
(c)
Valuation of inventories – UBL has decreased the selling price of products
significantly and there are increased levels of inventory expected at the year-end.
It is possible that the selling price may have fallen so that the net realisable value
(NRV) of inventory is below cost. LKAS 2 Inventory requires inventory to be stated
at the lower of cost and NRV. Hence it is possible that inventory is overvalued.
(Total: 10 marks)
(a)
Review previous year’s arrangements.
Discuss with the management the inventory count arrangements and
significant changes.
Assess the nature and volume of the inventory.
Assess risks relating to inventory.
Assess identification of high-value items.
Assess method of accounting for inventory.
Assess unit of measurement of inventory.
Assess location of inventory and how it affects inventory control and
recording.
Assess internal controls and accounting systems to identify potential areas of
difficulty.
Ensure a representative selection of locations, inventory and procedures is
covered.
Ensure sufficient attention is given to high-value items.
Arrange to obtain from any third parties confirmation of inventory they hold.
Consider the need for expert help.
(b) To identify inventories that may be worth less than cost, the following work
could be carried out.
Examine the computerised inventory control system and the list of items
showing an unacceptably low turnover rate.
Review the inventory report for items already described as seconds or
recorded as damaged.
Discuss with the management the current position regarding slow-moving
inventories, and their plans and expectations in respect of products that may
be discontinued.
At the physical inventory count, look for inventory that is dusty, inaccessible,
not moving in general and mark these on the inventory sheets.
Find out whether any production lines are unreliable and therefore products
are frequently returned for repairs, as these may be unpopular.
Review the trade press or other sources to see whether there are any outdated
equipment.
(i)
In accordance to LKAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period, any events after
the period-end and which give additional information of the conditions that
existed at the period-end, should result in the adjustment of the related figures
Per LKAS 2 Inventory, inventory held at the period-end and included in the
financial statements should be valued at the lower of cost and net realisable
value
Selling of the equipment at Rs. 120,000 in October 2017 is an event after the
reporting period, which gives evidence that the realisable value is lower than
the cost
(ii) Since the audit has not yet been finalised and the audit report has not yet been
issued yet, the value of inventory at the period-end should be reduced by
Rs. 600,000 .
(d)
(e) SLAuS outline what the auditor’s response should be when management refuses
permission for them to contact third parties for evidence.
If the management asks the auditor not to seek the confirmation, the auditor
shall enquire about the management's reasons for the refusal, and seek audit
evidence regarding the validity and reasonableness of the reasons.
The auditor shall also evaluate the implications of the refusal on the
assessment of the risk of material misstatement and on the nature, timing and
extent of other audit procedures.
The auditor shall perform alternative audit procedures to obtain relevant and
reliable audit evidence.
If the auditor concludes that the refusal is unreasonable, or the auditor cannot
obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence elsewhere,
the auditor shall communicate with those charged with governance
or consider the implications for the auditor's report
(Total: 25 marks)
(a)
(i)
The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether
opening balances contain misstatements that materially affect the current
period's financial statements.
The auditor shall determine whether the prior period’s closing balances have been
correctly brought forwarded or restated.
The auditor shall determine whether appropriate accounting policies are
consistently applied or changes have been properly accounted for and adequately
presented and disclosed.
(ii)
If the auditor is not able to confirm the opening balance, the auditor shall express
a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion
If the opening balances contain misstatements that materially affects the current
year's financial statements, the auditor shall express a qualified opinion or an
adverse opinion.
If the auditor concludes that the accounting policies are not consistently applied
in relation to opening balances, or changes have not been properly accounted for
and adequately presented and disclosed, the auditor shall express a qualified
opinion or an adverse opinion.
If a prior-period modification remains relevant and material to the current
period's financial statements, the auditor shall modify the auditor's opinion on the
current period's financial statements accordingly.
(b)
Examine supporting documents to verify dates of commencement and cessation
of activities necessary to construct the building (e.g. planning permission or
building plan approval, certificate of completion etc. issued by the local authority),
and determine whether the proportion of borrowing costs capitalised is
appropriate for capitalisation per accounting policy.
Compare the balance per the general ledger to the balance per the asset register
and call for explanation of any difference.
Physically inspect the building to confirm that it exists, is in use and in good
condition. Confirm all the items in the asset register are physically inspected.
Re-perform calculation of borrowing costs.
(c)
Depreciation charge/profit before tax
Deferred tax arising from temporary difference arising on the building
Retained earnings or accumulated losses brought forward
(d)
The mere fact that the auditor was not able to attend the inventory count is not
grounds for qualification. The auditor has to consider if alternative/additional
procedures could be performed to ascertain the inventory balance as at the year-
end. An example of such a procedure is observing a current physical stock take
and test-checking the rollback reconciliation to the year-end inventory quantities.
The inventory roll-back reconciliation should be prepared by the management. If
the auditor is able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence (as mentioned
earlier) regarding the year-end inventory balance, the audit opinion need not be
modified.
(e)
Enables the reporting partner to ensure all planned work has been adequately
completed.
Provides details of the work done for future reference.
Assists in planning and control of future audits.
Encourages a methodical approach.
Provides evidence of the auditor's basis for a conclusion about the
achievement of the overall objectives.
Provides evidence that the audit was planned and performed in accordance
with SLAuSs and other legal and regulatory requirements.
Assists the engagement team to plan and perform the audit.
Assists team members responsible for supervision to direct, supervise and
review audit work.
Enables the team to be accountable for its work.
Allows a record of matters of continuing significance to be retained.
(f)
Matters that give rise to significant risks (as defined in ISA 315).
Results of audit procedures indicating (i) that the financial statements could
be materially misstated, or (ii) a need to revise the auditor’s previous
assessment of the risks of material misstatement and the auditor’s responses
to those risks.
Circumstances that cause the auditor significant difficulty in applying
necessary audit procedures.
Findings that could result in a modification to the audit opinion or the inclusion
of an emphasis of matter paragraph in the auditor’s report.
(Total: 25 marks)
The answers given are entirely by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (CA Sri Lanka)
and you accept the answers on an "as is" basis.
They are not intended as “Model answers’, but rather as suggested solutions.
2. to assist students with their research into the subject and to further their understanding and
appreciation of the subject.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (CA Sri Lanka) makes no warranties with respect
to the suggested solutions and as such there should be no reason for you to bring any grievance against
the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (CA Sri Lanka). However, if you do bring any
action, claim, suit, threat or demand against the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (CA
Sri Lanka), and you do not substantially prevail, you shall pay the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of Sri Lanka's (CA Sri Lanka’s) entire legal fees and costs attached to such action. In the same token,
if the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (CA Sri Lanka) is forced to take legal action to
enforce this right or any of its rights described herein or under the laws of Sri Lanka, you will pay the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (CA Sri Lanka) legal fees and costs.
© 2013 by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (CA Sri Lanka).
All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission
of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (CA Sri Lanka).
KB4 – Business Assurance Ethics & Audit: Business Level Examination December 2017