Enclosure - Fibretron Composites Pvt. Ltd. Credentials (GRPF)
Enclosure - Fibretron Composites Pvt. Ltd. Credentials (GRPF)
COMPOSITES
Glass-Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Rebar
STRENGTH IN SUSTAINABILITY
COMPANY PROFILE
1
Introduction Letter
GSTIN certificate
Pan card
ISO Certification/or other certification updated
MSME Registration
3 BROUCHURE
Fibretron Brouchure
4 TEST CERTIFICATES
Test Reports, MSDS, MTC
Subject: Introduction and Request for Approval of Fibretron Composites Pvt Ltd's Product
Dear sir/mam,
At Fibretron Composites Pvt Ltd, we pride ourselves on our commitment to quality and
innovation. Our state-of-the-art manufacturing facility, located in Greater Noida, boasts
cutting-edge technology and fully automated machinery to ensure the highest standards of
production. With ISO certification 9001:2015, we guarantee that our products meet and
exceed industry benchmarks.
Our dedicated team of highly qualified engineers and technicians oversees the manufacturing
process, supported by a fully equipped quality control laboratory. We offer value-added
services such as customized cutting and automated bending to meet the unique requirements
of our clients.
We understand the importance of your approval in endorsing the quality and reliability of our
product. Therefore, we earnestly request your consideration and approval of our GFRP bars
for use in your esteemed projects.
Thank you for considering our proposal. We look forward to the opportunity to collaborate and
serve your organization with our superior products and services. Please do not hesitate to
contact us for any further information or clarification.
Sincerely,
Pranav Jain
Director
Fibretron Composites Pvt Ltd
COMPANY PROFILE
Registration Certificate
x
Registration Number : 09AAFCF3904J1ZK
Ta
1. Legal Name FIBRETRON COMPOSITES PRIVATE LIMITED
es
3. Additional trade names, if any
ic
4. Constitution of Business Private Limited Company
5. Address of Principal Place of H-30, Noida Greater Noida Link Road, Near Thomson Press
rv
Business Warehouse, Surajpur Site C Industrial, Greater Noida,
Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, 201306
Se
Note: The registration certificate is required to be prominently displayed at all places of business in the
State.
This is a system generated digitally signed Registration Certificate issued based on the approval of application granted
on 12/05/2023 by the jurisdictional authority.
15/12/2023, 14:03 Print : Udyam Registration Certificate
Name of
Flat/Door/Block
H-30 Premises/ .
No.
Building
Surajpur
Village/Town Industrial Block Site-C
Area
OFFICAL ADDRESS OF ENTERPRISE Noida-
Greater
Road/Street/Lane City Gautam Buddha Nagar
Noida Link
Road
UTTAR GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR ,
State District
PRADESH Pin 201306
Mobile 9999997522 Email: fi[email protected]
DATE OF INCORPORATION /
16/03/2023
REGISTRATION OF ENTERPRISE
DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF
16/08/2023
PRODUCTION/BUSINESS
https://udyamregistration.gov.in/Udyam_User/Udyam_PrintApplication.aspx 1/2
CERTIFICATE NO:
DIPP129152
Government of India
Ministry of Commerce & Industry
Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION
This is to certify that FIBRETRON COMPOSITES PRIVATE LIMITED incorporated as a Private Limited Company on
16-03-2023, is recognized as a startup by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. The startup is working
in 'Construction' Industry and 'Construction & Engineering' sector as self-certified by them.
This certificate shall only be valid for the Entity up to Ten years from the date of its incorporation
only if its turnover for any of the financial years has not extended 100 Cr.
16-04-2023 15-03-2033
DATE OF ISSUE VALID UPTO
PLANT SETUP
AND
MACHINERY
The manufacturing process involves precise control of resin impregnation, fiber alignment,
curing conditions, and quality assurance measures to produce high-quality GFRP bars with
consistent properties and performance for various structural applications.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
1. Inward Resin Properties:
Physical properties of the inward resin, including viscosity, specific weight, and gel-
time, are regularly verified to ensure consistency and quality.
2. Roving Calculation:
The number of rovings required to achieve a minimum mass fraction of glass fiber
at 80% and resin matrix at 20% is calculated and monitored for each batch.
3. Die Internal Diameter:
The internal diameter of the die is determined and regularly inspected to achieve
the measured nominal diameter of the GFRP bars. Maintaining the cross-sectional
area is crucial for structural integrity.
4. Weight and Diameter Measurement:
The weight per meter and measured diameter of the cured bars are determined for
every batch to ensure adherence to specifications and standards.
5. Glass Transition Temperature:
The glass transition temperature is measured and maintained above 100 degrees
Celsius to ensure the structural longevity of the reinforced concrete.
6. Third-Party Testing:
Mechanical properties of each batch are subjected to third-party testing to verify
compliance with standards and specifications.
7. Documentation and Record-Keeping:
Detailed records of all quality control tests, measurements, and inspections are
maintained for traceability and audit purposes.
8. Continuous Improvement:
Continuous monitoring and feedback mechanisms are in place to identify areas for
improvement and implement corrective actions to enhance product quality and
consistency.
By implementing these quality assurance measures, we ensure that our GFRP bars meet
the highest standards of performance, durability, and safety for use in various structural
applications.
TESTING PROGRAMME
Testing Program:
Physical Properties Testing:
Viscosity Test: Measure the viscosity of the resin to ensure consistency and proper
flow during impregnation.
Specific Weight Test: Determine the specific weight of the resin to verify the correct
ratio of resin components.
Gel-Time Test: Assess the gel time of the resin to monitor the curing process and
ensure adequate handling time.
Glass Transition Temperature (Tg) Testing:
Conduct Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis to determine the glass
transition temperature of the GFRP bars.
Ensure that the Tg is above 100 degrees Celsius to ensure structural longevity and
durability.
Mechanical Properties Testing:
Third-party testing of mechanical properties, including:
Tensile Strength: Evaluate the maximum tensile load a GFRP bar can withstand
before failure.
Flexural Strength: Measure the maximum stress a GFRP bar can withstand
when subjected to bending forces.
Compressive Strength: Determine the maximum load a GFRP bar can
withstand under compression.
Shear Strength: Assess the resistance of GFRP bars to shear forces.
Modulus of Elasticity: Measure the stiffness of GFRP bars under tensile or
flexural loading conditions.
Ultimate Strain: Determine the maximum strain or deformation a GFRP bar can
undergo before failure.
Dimensional Testing:
Measure the diameter and length of GFRP bars to ensure compliance with
specifications and tolerances.
Verify the cross-sectional area and uniformity of GFRP bars to meet design
requirements.
Batch Testing:
Conduct batch testing of GFRP bars to ensure consistency in physical and
mechanical properties across production runs.
Random sampling of GFRP bars for testing to ensure representative results and
quality control.
Quality Control Measures:
Implement stringent quality control procedures throughout the manufacturing
process to detect and correct any deviations or defects.
Regular calibration and maintenance of testing equipment to ensure accuracy and
reliability of test results.
Compliance Testing:
Ensure compliance with relevant standards, specifications, and regulatory
requirements for GFRP bars used in construction applications.
Obtain necessary certifications and approvals from regulatory authorities to validate
the quality and performance of GFRP bars.
The testing program aims to validate the physical, mechanical, and dimensional properties
of GFRP bars, ensuring their suitability and reliability for various structural applications.
Regular testing and quality control measures help maintain consistent quality and
performance standards for GFRP products manufactured by Fibretron Composites Pvt Ltd.
BROUCHURE
SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE
SOLUTIONS
(FIBRETRON rebars compared to steel)
Raw Materials
FIBRETRON rebars have a 15% lower carbon footprint than steel*
Distribution
4 x lighter than steel FIBRETRON Rebars
Recycle Manufacturing
More products per truckload Composite
Less fuel required for transportation Life Style
Use
Increases asset life-cycle by as much as four times
Zero maintenance requirements
Seawater can be used in cement production
Saves fresh water
Use Transportation
Less cement content needed
Recycle
FIBRETRON composites can be crushed and used as
aggregate in concrete
*Comparison based on the manufacture of steel rebar.
STRENGTH IN SUSTAINABILITY
The use of Fibretron rebars in construction can play a significant role in India's mission to
become 'Net zero' by reducing the carbon foo print of buildings and infrastructure.
Fibretron rebars are an innovative and eco-friendly alternative to traditional steel
reinforcement bars, with significantly lower embodied carbon and a longer service life. By
replacing steel with Fibretron rebars, the construction industry can reduce its carbon
emissions and contribute to India's ambitious goal of achieving net-zero greenhouse gas
emissions by 2050.
ADVANTAGES OF USING
FIBRETRON PRODUCTS
Whole of Life Savings
Design life cycle becomes Double with 100+ years with Zero maintenance cost
Corrosion Free
Exceptional resistance in salt water environments, Does not rust or leach
Non-electromagnetic
Non-conductive and electro-magnetically neutral
Non-magnetic
No interference with sensitive enquipment
Lightweight
4 x lighter than steel with Faster installation, reduced injury risks, &
lower transportation costs
Easy to cut and install
Cut on-site using standard cutting tools
Highly Durable
Over 100 years retention of strength and modulus in high pH environments
2X 4 40%
STRONGER TIMES LIGHTER CHEAPER
APPLICATIONS
SPECIAL APPLICATIONS
These are the applications where traditional steel reinforcement faulters and
FIBRETRON Rebars provide much superior results.
OTHER APPLICATIONS
Tensile strength
(MPa)/ N/ mm^2 500 1000+
Bond strength
Mpa/ N/ mm^2 14* 12.5
Compression
Mpa/ N/ mm^2 500 450
Modulus of
Elasticity (Gpa) 160-200 65
Elongation(%) 25 4
Density 1.9
(ton/m3) 7.8
Electrical Electrically
conductivity conductive material Dielectric
TABLE OF SUBSTITUTION
BY TENSILE STRENGTH
4.74kg 8 = 0.57kg 6
7.40kg 10
= 0.94kg 7
10.65kg 12
= 1.23kg 8
14.52kg 14
= 1.65kg 10
18.93kg 16 = 2.48kg 12
24.00kg 18 = 3.24kg 14
35.76kg 22 = 4.87kg 16
46.22kg 25 = 6.28kg 18
58.02kg 28 = 8.08kg 20
75.79kg 32 = 9.80kg 22
TECHNICAL DATA
Fibretron (ASTM D7957, ACI 440.6)
#2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #10
Units
(6mm/0.23in) (10mm/0.39in) (13mm/0.51in) (16mm/0.62in) (19mm/0.74in) (22mm/0.86in) (25mm/0.98in) (32mm/1.25in)
Elastic GPa 46
Modulus ksi 6670
kN
Guaranteed kip
transverse
shear capacity MPa 150
ksi 23.2
Primary Materials Epoxy Backboned Vinylester and Corrosion Resistant E-CR Glass
Please contact our team for information on the material properties, shape availability and dimensional limitations of bent bars.
Saudi Arabia: ACI 440.1R; ACI CODE-440.11-22: Building Code Requirements for
Structural Concrete Reinforced with (GFRP) Bars
Roughly 11,000 km GFRP rebar reinforcen this concrete flood mitigation channel in
jizan, Saudi Arbaia and enable its 100 years service life.
Port of Rotterdam upgrade, The Netherlands Gisborne Port Upgrade, New Zealand
FIBRETRON SAVINGS
Cost Savings & Sustainability
across the Asset Life-cycle Global warming potential of bridge made
with either FIBRETRON or steel, tCO2eq over 100 yrs
1,500
Upfront
global warming
1,090 For replacement potential
1,000 similar
bridge, global
warming between
potential has Fibretron &
500 been amortised steel rebar
bridges
1st Life 1st Life 2nd Life
(100 yr) (75 yr) (100 yr)
0
FIBRETRON Steel 1,480
rebar bridge rebar bridge
Economic Prosperity
Longer life cycles. Non-corrosive durable rebar requires no expensive
maintenance and preventative corrosion measures.
■ Design guides and codes have been improved over time. In recognition of the
high performance of modern Fibretron rebars, the quantities required for rein-
forcement have been reduced.
■ Design and manufacturing of Fibretron rebar have been optimized and are
competitively priced.
■ Eliminating the risk of corrosion in infrastructure results in savings across the
entire asset life.
■ Less maintenance (e.g. roadworks) reduces economic losses through delays,
and business interference.
■ 4x lighter than steel means less tonnage to transport.
Social Responsibility
FIBRETRON is 4x lighter than steel, making it easier to install, and decreases
injury risk to workers.
■ Robust infrastructure, particularly roading and bridges, allows supply chain
companies and communities to travel safely and freely without delays.
Environmental Savings
FIBRETRON does not corrode or cause concrete spalling and breakage.
How is the FIBRETRON better than metal? What are the advantages
of composite reinforcement in comparison with traditional metal
rebars
EASY INSTALLATION - Reinforcing bars can be cut from the bay of any given
length, fasten with plastic clips, special fasteners-clamps or just a binding wire.
TEST CERTIFICATES
RT,SULTS
TENS!LE TEST:
Parameters Results-1 Results-2
Mass per meter, g 111.25 ttt.24
Density, g/cm3 2.L 2,L
Area, mm2 52.98 52.97
[oad. kN 59.04 51.96
Tensile Strength, MPa 1114.38 tL69.72
Modulus of elasticitv, GPa 55.03 58.66
c#u
1. This test refers only to tested samples and applicable parameters only.
2. The sample description is not verified in all case and is given as described by the customer.
3. Test samples will be disposed after 15 days from the date of issue of test reports.
4. Complaints if any should be in writing within seven days from the date of issue of test reports,
5. This Report cannot be reproduced wholly or in part and cannot be used as in a court of law
and shall not be used in the Advertising media without written approval of (Doc. No.:
SHEAR TEST:
Parameters Results-1 Results-2 Results-3 Results-4 Results-5
Mass per meter, g 49.354 49.355 49.348 49.350 49.352
Density, g/cm3 2.1 2.t 2.L 2.L 2.1
Area, mm2 23.50 23.50 23.50 23.50 23.50
Load, kN 11.133 9.9s2 tL.492 9.662 9.671
Shear Strength, MPa 236.87 21,-.74 2M.5t 205.57 20s.77
DISCLAIMER:
1. This test refers only to tested samples and applicable parameters only.
2. The sample description is not verified in all case and is given as described by the customer.
3. Test samples will be disposed after 15 days from the date of issue of test reports.
4. Complaints if any should be in writing within seven days from the date of issue of test reports.
5. This Report cannot be reproduced wholly or in part and cannot be used as evidence in a court of law
and shall not be used in the Advertising media without written approval of the lab. (Doc. No.: ELPL/LFI18)
qrfuffq$erqiFq
I
PLASTICS TESTING CENTRE
PART.B
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
i) Reference to sampling procedure Samples supplied by the Party
ii) Supporting documents for the measurement taken and result derived As given in Part C
iiD Deviation from the test method as prescribed in relevant work
Nit
instruction, if a
--- \
B Karthik (Assistant Technical Officer) A. K. Joshi (Quality Manager)
sft a 0+am*+-attAuth ori zed S ig n atory sft -f -d d€drarrfi -dttluth o rize d S ig n ato ry
fttz , (S qq E w) trcrN CONTINUATION SHEET
Water absorption I
ASTIV D57O-98 0.17
@ 5C'C for 24 hrs
Water absorption
3 ASTIV D57O-98 026
@ 23"C for 2 week in water
PART.D
Page 01 of 04
NOTE:
These results relate only to the sample tested
This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory
Website –www.finefinish.net Doc No.- FFOPL/AL/QF/7.8-02-04
Date of Issue-21.03.2020
ULR No: TC633223100000512F
Test Report Number: FFO/23-24/E-223
Date of Report:19.07.2023
Glass Transition
1. ≥100°C 100.75°C ASTM D 3418:21
Temperature (Tg)
*Specification is provided by customer
Graph:
Page 02 of 04
NOTE:
These results relate only to the sample tested
This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory
Website –www.finefinish.net Doc No.- FFOPL/AL/QF/7.8-02-04
Date of Issue-21.03.2020
ULR No: TC633223100000512F
Test Report Number: FFO/23-24/E-223
Date of Report:19.07.2023
Enthalpy of
1. - 399.9J/g ASTM E 2160:2004
Polymerization
Graph:
Page 03 of 04
NOTE:
These results relate only to the sample tested
This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory
Website –www.finefinish.net Doc No.- FFOPL/AL/QF/7.8-02-04
Date of Issue-21.03.2020
END OF REPORT
Page 04 of 04
NOTE:
These results relate only to the sample tested
This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory
APPROVALS
AND
IMPORTANT GOVT.
DOCUMENTS
CIRCULAR
To
Subject: - Value Engineering Practices for the Design, construction & Maintenance of
National Highways Projects- Reg,
Madam/Sir,
The Government of lndia has set an ambitious ptan for devetopment of National
Highways in the country. Many initiatives have been taken to materiatise this ambitious ptan
such as adopting wortdwide best practices in engineering techniques in design, construction
and maintenance of highways, bridges and tunnets. Further, the need is fett to adopt value
engineering practices in design, construction and maintenance with regards to use of
materiats and technotogy as an important and vital step to meet the sustainabte
devetopment of the NH network throughout the country in a cost-effective manner with
improved durabitity & safety, de-carbonise & grow, reduction in project execution timetine,
increase in quatity and reduction in maintenance.
4. EPC/ HAM / BOT mode of project implementation has the potentiat that the
contractors/concessionaire woutd be abte to adopt designs and construction methodotogies
to suit the requirements of the project to bring down the initiat construction cost white not
impacting other aspects such as functionatity, quatity or durabitity. Atthough enabting
provisions for vatue engineering is taid out in the governing IRC Manuats for highway projects
(lRC SP: 73184/87199), however Contractors / Concessionaire, out of an aPPrehension that
the Authority woutd take adverse views about any alternative technotogies, avoid any
deviations from the specifications/technotogies specified in the Concession/ Contract
Agreement. The Concessionaire/ Contractors are also apprehensive about the long-term
risks of adopting innovative vatue engineering proposats, which would be entirety borne by
them.
5. To dispet such apprehensions and mind-set among Feasibitity & DPR
Consultant/Concessionaire/Contractors/ lElAE and add vatue engineering practices for the
design, construction & maintenance of the Nationat Highway, fo[towing has been decided:
5.1 Va[ue Engineering shatt be assigned as one of the tasks in the Terms of Reference
(ToR) for Feasibitity Study and Detaited Engineering Projects. ln the lnception Report itsetf,
there shatl be a Chapter regarding Value Engineering, in which the Consuttant shatt inctude
the potential & project-specific vatue engineering aspects identified by the respective
domain experts based on site reconnaissance surveys, ln the Feasibitity Report, the
Consultant shatt examine the appticabitity, durabitity, constructabitity & appropriateness of
the identified vatue engineering aspects and recommend the cost-effective strategies.
During the design stage, the design sha[[ be done for the approved value engineering criteria
and considering the same the Schedutes and Project Costs shatl be prepared. Some examptes
of value engineering concepts are given in Appendix-1. However, in addition to the same
other value engineering aspects shalI atso be exptored.
5.2 During the Project appraisat, in PATSC/SFC memo, there shatl be a para regarding
Value engineering Practices examined and finatty adopted.
[6]oL*r Y-a'^]
jo'lo ( )A
$S,
L2- - ,,
traffic diversion, pottution control measures, environmentaI comptiance/construction
sequence/materiat design shatI be submitted to lElAE for review,
5.3.2 Subsequentty, during trial laying, validation of considered material characteristic in
design sha[[ be done and if necessary, modification in design shall be done. Construction
shaU be started incorporating the modifications, if any.
5.3.3 The Concessionaire/Contractors shatt be entitted to retain all the savings accrued to
them on account of vatue engineering practices adopted by them.
6. The content of this circutar sha[[ be appticabte for alt the ongoing/ upcoming projects
henceforth and untiI any further orders,
7. lt that the contents of the circutar may be brought into the notice of atl
is requested
concerned for immediate needfuI comptiance.
Yours sincerety,
e.il."r yeJStq
zrr ?olaP]-:o>L_
(Bidur Kant Jha)
Director
(New Technology for Highway Devetopment)
For Director General (Road Devetopment) & Speciat Secretary
Copy to:
1. Att CEs in the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
2. Att ROs of the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
3. The Secretary Generat, lndian Roads Congress
4. Technical circutar file of S&R (P&B) Section
5. NIC-for uptoading on Ministry's website under "What's new"
Page3/3
Appendix-l: Formulation of Value Engineering Strategy for National Highway Projects
The cost component of a highway project generatty comprises of 70% of Material costs, 20%
of Machineries costs and 10.0% of Manpower costs. Hence, to have a vatue-engineered
optimum highway emphasis shatl be on material selection and design.
1. Policy for Design & Construction of Futuristic Flexible Pavement (FFP)
Ftexibte Pavement (New Construction) shatl be designed for maximum altowed effective
subgrade design CBR 15.0% as per IRC: 37 -2018. lt can be achieved by:
. using setect soil (either borrow or excavated) of required CBR for subgrade and
embankment construction as per IRC:37 and MORT&H Specification,
. improved subgrade upper layer(top 250mm) using setect soit treated with hydrated
lime/cement/fty ash/pond ash etc. as per IRC:37, MORT&H Specification, and
IRC:SP:89(Part l& Part ll),
pg"r ,r-a{ffi',,,a-a-
Pagel/6
Appendix-1: Formulation of Value Engineering Strategy for National Highway Projects
ii. The minimum rate of Steel from the SAIL/TISCO and private manufacturers
sha[[ be taken.
iii, The rate anatysis of concrete shatl be taken considering 20 per cent fly ash
by weight of total cementitious materiat subjected to avaitabitity of fty ash
within economic hautage.
3. Suggested Flexible Pavement layer Combination - Att the layer combinations
atternatives avaitable in IRC: 37-2018 shat[ be techno-economicatty evatuated and
recommend the appropriate one. At[ designs and estimations shalt necessarity be based on
actual optimat requirements for tayer thicknesses as per IRC: 37-7018. Suggestive
thicknesses as per catatogues (Ref. Section 12 of IRC: 37-2018) shatl not be used even for
estimation purposes.
4.Use of Glass/Carbon/Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer Rebar for non-load bearing/
minor CD Structures
Fiber Reinforced Potymers (FRP's) are a proven and successfuI atternative reinforcing that
wit[ give structures a longer service life. To reduce the demand of conventional
reinforcement for highway projects, it is prudent to attow Glass/Carbon/Aramid Fiber
Reinforced Polymer Rebar for non-toad bearing structures [ike Crash barrier, Drain and
minor CD structures i.e. Hume pipe Cutvert and box Cutvert. There is a reduction ol 5-10%
of the cost.
As the IRC Guidetine and State-of-Art Report for Gtass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars has
recently been finalised. However fotlowing design standards & Specifications may atso be
referred:
ffisffi"i;?
Appendix-1: Formulation of Value Engineering Strategy for National Highway Projects
To reduce the GHG gases emission and cost of transportation, it is suggested during DpR
stage itself the localty available marginat road buitding materiat as welt as industrial
waste/Stag/mines waste has to be evaluated. DPR must have the recommendations
regarding improvement measures to uptift locatty availabte materiat/industriat/ mines waste
to the premium road building material in the vicinity of the project Road.
6. Type of Concrete Pavement
6.1 Bonded Concrete Pavement
Bonded concrete pavement shatl be designed as per IRC: 58-2015 for new construction. lt is
similar to conventional concrete pavement except no potythene sheet in between DLc and
PQC. However, joint groove cuts are required in the DLC [ayer for 1/3rd depth exactty at
the location of the joints in PQc to avoid random reftection cracking of the pec due to
cracks in the DLc. Generatty the thickness of conventional concrete pavement is zgo-
300mm, whereas with bonded concrete pavement it is 220-240mm. That is reduction of 20-
25% PQC concrete votume and initiatly construction cost itself is comparabte to the
conventional f lexi bte pavement.
6,2 Short-Panelled Concrete Pavement/Geo-cell filled Concrete pavement
using IRC: 58-2002 and computation of stresses should be done based on Finite Etement
Modetting (FEM). Sections have been taid in some of the projects, such as Nagpur lnner Ring
Road, Nagpur Hingta lndustria[ Area, Amravati Pathan Chowk; so far generatty the
performance has been observed as satisfactory. IRC Guidetines for the same are under
development presentty.
6.4 White-Topping for Existing Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation
White-topping shatl be also evaluated for rehabititation of existing ftexible pavement. lts
thickness varies from 150-180mm as per IRC: SP:. 76-2015.
It is better to improve this unsuitabte soil with fty ash/pond ash/hydrated time/cement and
reuse it for earthwork. With the same, there is no requirement of suitab[e borrow earth as
wetl as savings in transportation cost and reduction in GHG emission.
Therefore, suitabte decision may be taken to adopt appropriate methodotogy based on
retative scale of economy of atternate options.
7.2 Reuse of Excavated Soil
There must be accountabitity regarding reuse of excavated suitabte soil.
Generally it is observed that the existing bituminous layer materiat is dismantted and
dumped atong national Highway in case of reconstruction/submerging due to proposed
VUP/Pup/change of pavement type to concrete pavement. lt is merely a huge loss to the
nation due to wastage of costty RAP. There must be a MP bank atong the National Highway.
a$l#lePage4l6
Appendix-1: Formulation of Value Engineering Strategy for National Highway Projects
The mitted RAP is atso being used as RAP tayer by adding 25% virgin aggregate, 1.0% cement
and 7-3% foamed bitumen /emutsion. RAP is used as bituminous base course.
It is prudent to rectaim the same and re-use RAP generated. There must be accountability
regarding reuse of rectaimed RAP.
The guidetines to be referred are IRC: 37-2018 and IRC: 120-2015 except for % of RAP, which
may be increased with the approval of authority.
For wearing course renewat, fiber reinforced micro-surfacing of 8-1omnm thickness shatt be
adopted.
U^a"".f$1[*
Page5/6
Appendix-1: Formulation of Value Engineering Strategy for Nationa[ Highway Projects
Pond Ash is the proven materia[ for embankment/subgrade layer construction. lts
avaitabitity shatt be ensured for the construction of highways.
13. Use of Soil Stabilised Earthen Shoulder
Presentty in upper 150mm of earthen shoutder crushed aggregate is being used. As a cost-
effective atternative soil treated wilh 3-4% cement shatl be used. lt wit[ atso not require
virgin aggregate. The guideline to be referred is Kenyan Pavement design Manuat.
14. Use of Construction & Demotition(C&D) Waste
A C&D bank shatl be atong the National Highway and the material sha[[ be used as an
alternative to sand/fine aggregate for concrete. For this crushing of C&D material wit[ be
required. The guideline to be referred is IRC: 121- 2017 "Guidetines for Use of Construction
and Demotition Waste in Road Sector".
16. Promote use of new sustainable materials for bridges (Such as Stainless Steel,
Weathering Steel ...etc.) based on life cycle costing
17. Promote use of modular, prefabricated, adaptable and re-usable structures for
temporary, emergency and permanent bridges in remote areas
18. Use of Fiber Reinforced/High Strength Shotcrete for Tunnel works
19. Geometric Design
FRL / Cutvert sizes shatl be fixed based on hydrotogical modetling. FRL of VUP shatl be fixed
in duty consideration of the cross-road [eve[.
Avoid the Curvature Sections & super elevation on the major structure locations, since it
may increase the cost of structure and pose safety issues.
During road profile design, section having lined drains, the profite shoutd be such that
natura[ streams / proposed/existing CD structures shatl be the natural disposal of storm
water. This wit[ result in economic sections of the drain.
With afore-mentioned vatue engineering practices, there may be a reduction of
initial project cost in the tune of 20-30 %. Besides this, there is a time savings, less
consumption of road buitding materiats and tess emission of GHG without compromising
performance durabitity of the NationaI Highways Asset.
Bi{q'r rze"ldtq
aoloq ><'>)..--
Page6l6
File No.RW/NH-34049/01 /2020-S&:R(P&:B)pt.
Government of India
Ministry of Road Transport a Highways
(SaR (paB/New Technology) Zone)
Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110001
Dated: 22nd February, 2023
CIRCULAR
To
Madam/Sir,
Page 1 / 2
iv. Any material/technology/design shall be called "New" until there is no available
MoRT8:H Specification/IRC guidelines. Once it is available, it will be called as
conventional/ proven.
2. It is requested that the contents of the circular may be brought into the notice of all
concerned for immediate needful compliance.
Yours sincerely,
'~A'4Y ¥-e~ Jt.a.
''2-- 2_t)'2-~~2--3,
(Bidur Kant Jha)
Director
(New Technology for Highway Development)
For Director General (Road Development) 8: Special Secretary
Copy to:
1. All CEsin the Ministry of Road Transport 8: Highways
2. All ROsof the Ministry of Road Transport 8: Highways
3. The Secretary General, Indian RoadsCongress
4. Technical circular file of S8:R(P8:B)Section
5. NIC-for uploading on Ministry's website under "What's new"
Page 2/2
CEIGALL BATHINDA DABWALI HIGHWAYS PRIVATE
LIMITED
Site Office: - Village Sangat Kalan Teh -Sangat, Distt.-Bhatinda pin no.:- 151401
E-mail: - [email protected]
CIL/IE/JRMD/2023-24/194 Date: 11-12-2023
To,
The Team Leader,
M/S Highway Engineering Consultant
#08, basheshar nagar, opposite
zail singh college, dabwali road,
near AIIMS hospital Bathinda-151001
Email: [email protected]
Ref:
1. IE Letter HEC/NHAI/IE/Bathinda-Dabwali/2023-24/2690 Dated:17-11-2023
2. This office letter: -CIL/IE/JRMD/2023-24/84 Dated 13-10-2023
Dear Sir,
This is with reference to your letter dated 17.11.2023 (under ref-1), vide which certain
observations were given on submitted Drawing and Design of GFRB Drain (Glass Fiber
Reinforcement Bar) by Concessionaire vide its letter under ref-2. In this regard, we
hereby submitting the Compliance/Reply of the observations as under for your review
and concurrence:
Sl Concessionaire
IE observation vide letter 2690
No. Compliance/Reply
As in submitted drawing from
the Concessionaire end, there is
no variation in any dimension as
Drawing and Design Details of GFRB Drain
compared to the Concession
(Glass Fiber Reinforcement Bar) submitted by
Agreement. Further, it is also to
Concessionaire have been reviewed and found
1 mention that the submitted
that submission is not as per provisions of
drawing is meeting the Codal
Schedule-B (Page no.-172) and Drawing Volume
Requirement. As the Design is
(Page no.-26) of the Concession Agreement.
part of the Concessionaire,
accordingly the Design of the
section has been submitted.
Submitted Design and Drawing is not
2 Do the same as S. No. 1
acceptable, you are requested to submit revised
In view of the above it is requested you that the submitted the design and drawing of the
drain is nowhere compromised by the Concessionaire end and the submitted design is
supported by IRC 137. Therefore, we once again request you to please review the
submitted drawing.
Thanking you and assuring you of our best services at all times.
Yours sincerely,
(Authorized Signatory)
Enclosure: As Above.